Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T16:38:15.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Reflections on the Psychology and Social Science of Cyberspace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Azy Barak  and
John Suler
Edited by
Azy Barak
Azy Barak
Affiliation:
University of Haifa
John Suler
Affiliation:
Rider University
Azy Barak
Affiliation:
University of Haifa, Israel
Get access

Summary

Personal computers and computer networks began to take over offices and increasingly the public in the 1980s, but the extensive adoption of the Internet did not come about until the introduction of the first browsers and the overwhelming acceptance of Microsoft Windows and Apple systems – equipped with advanced graphics – both in the mid-1990s. The world changed in many ways for numerous people from that point, as both social institutions and individuals have witnessed and participated in another social revolution: the availability and accessibility of information of all kinds and the dramatic innovation in interpersonal communication. With the assistance and encouragement of governments and many organizations (acting out of a variety of reasons), computers, linked to ever-growing networks, penetrated the general public rather quickly and relatively easily. It did not take long before numerous technological firms around the world, acknowledging significant improvements in a broad array of personal, work-related, social, business-related, and government-related activities, joined a competitive race for this line of business, marked by its creativity and high potential. Accordingly, they advanced and reinforced more intensive use of computers and numerous computer-related activities. This race, in turn, brought about fantastic technological developments that have changed people's world order and lives in many ways, from seeking and using information on any topic to shopping and trading, from communication with acquaintances and with strangers to virtual dating and a love life, from learning and teaching to doing research, from helping others and being helped to improved use of medicine and other facets of health care, from entertainment and leisure to self-expression.

Type
Chapter
Information
Psychological Aspects of Cyberspace
Theory, Research, Applications
 , pp. 1 - 12
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2005). Personality and the Internet. In Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (Ed.), The social net: Human behavior in cyberspace (pp. 27–55). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Antoniou, G., & Harmelen, F. (2004). A semantic web primer. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barak, A. (1999). Psychological applications on the Internet: A discipline on the threshold of a new millennium. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 8, 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barak, A. (2007). Phantom emotions: Psychological determinants of emotional experiences on the Internet. In Joinson, A., McKenna, K. Y. A., Postmes, T., & Reips, U. D. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 303–329). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barak, A., & Bloch, N. (2006). Factors related to perceived helpfulness in supporting highly distressed individuals through an online support chat. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 60–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barak, A., & Gluck-Ofri, O. (2007). Degree and reciprocity of self-disclosure in online forums. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 407–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573–590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, C. T. (2005). Benefits of participating in Internet interviews: Women helping women. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 411–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, H. (2006). Flow on the net–detecting Web users' positive affects and their flow states. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz-Uhler, B., Bishop-Clark, C., & Howard, E. (2005). Formation of and adherence to a self-disclosure norm in an online chat. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8, 114–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, C. (2006). The role of law in the governance of the Internet. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 20, 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, J. (Ed.). (1999). How to use computers and cyberspace in the clinical practice of psychotherapy. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.Google Scholar
Gackenbach, J. (Ed.). (1998). Psychology and the Internet. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Galin, A., Gross, M., & Gosalker, G. (2007). E-negotiation versus face-to-face negotiation what has changed – if anything? Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 787–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, D. N. (1999). Virtual addiction. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.Google Scholar
Haythornthwaite, C., & Hagar, C. (2004). The social worlds of the Web. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39, 311–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joinson, A. N. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: Reciprocal self-disclosure in Internet-based surveys. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4, 587–591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, S. A. (1999). Internet gambling and pornography: Illustrative examples of the psychological consequences of communication anarchy. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2, 175–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraut, R., Lundmark, V., Patterson, M., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53, 1017–1031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leung, L. (2002). Loneliness, self-disclosure, and ICQ (“I Seek You”) use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5, 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, D. (2000). Virtual attraction: What rocks your boat. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 565–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantovani, G. (2002). Internet haze: Why new artifacts can enhance situation ambiguity. Culture & Psychology, 8, 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoyd, J. L. M., & Kerson, Schwaber T. (2006). Conducting intensive interviews using email: A serendipitous comparative opportunity. Qualitative Social Work, 5, 389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, K., & Seidman, G. (2005). You, me, and we: Interpersonal processes in electronic groups. In Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (Ed.), The social net: Human behavior in cyberspace (pp. 191–217). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Norton, M. I., Frost, J. H., & Ariely, D. (2007). Less is more: The lure of ambiguity, or why familiarity breeds contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 97–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved March 1, 2007, from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.htmlGoogle Scholar
Riva, G., Botella, C., Légeron, P., & Optale, G. (Eds.). (2004). Cybertherapy: Internet and virtual reality as assessment and rehabilitation tools for clinical psychology and neuroscience. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Riva, G., Gaggioli, A., Villani, D., Preziosa, A., Morganti, F., Corsi, R., Faletti, G., & Vezzadini, L. (2007). NeuroVR: an open source virtual reality platform for clinical psychology and behavioral neurosciences. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 125, 394–399.Google ScholarPubMed
Rollman, J. B., Krug, K., & Parente, F. (2000). The chat room phenomenon: Reciprocal communication in cyberspace. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollman, B., & Parente, F. (2001). Relation of statement length and type and type of chat room reciprocal communication on the Internet. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4, 617–622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sassenberg, K., Boos, M., Pstmes, T., & Reips, U. D. (2003). Studying the Internet: A challenge for modern psychology. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 62, 75–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suler, J. (1996). The black hole phenomenon. Retrieved March 1, 2007, from http://www.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/blackhole.html.Google Scholar
Suler, J. (1996–2007). The psychology of cyberspace. Retrieved March 1, 2007, from http://www.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/psycyber.html.
Suler, J. (1999). Cyberspace as psychological space. Retrieved on March 1, 2007, from http://www.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/psychspace.html.Google Scholar
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 321–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanis, M., & Postmes, T. (2007). Two faces of anonymity: Paradoxical effects of cues to identity in CMC. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 955–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thatcher, A., & Cour, A. (2003). Small group decision-making in face-to-face and computer-mediated environments: the role of personality. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22, 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Turkle, S. (2004). Whither psychoanalysis in computer culture? Psychoanalytic Psychology, 21, 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, P. (1999). The psychology of the Internet. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Weber, W., Rabaey, J. M., & Aarts, E. (Eds.). (2006). Ambient intelligence. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Whitty, T. E., & Carr, A. N. (2006). Cyberspace romance: The psychology of online relationships. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, M. Z., & Flanagin, A. J. (2006). A self-awareness approach to computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 518–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, K. (1998). Caught in the net. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×