Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T13:51:45.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Thomas Payne
Thomas Payne
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Exploring Language Structure
A Student's Guide
 , pp. 349 - 356
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aberdour, Catherine. 1985. Referential devices in Apurinã discourse. In Porto Velho workpapers, ed. Fortune, David L., 43–91. Brasília: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. A grammar of Tariana. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allott, Robin. 1995. Sound symbolism. In Language in the Würm Glaciation, ed. Figge, Udo L., 15–38. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Anderson, Steven R. 1992. A-Morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arensen, Jonathan E. 1982. Murle grammar. Occasional Papers in the Study of Sudanese Languages Second person (you, y'all, etc.): First person (I, me, we, us, etc.)–143.Google Scholar
Austin, Peter. 1980. Switch reference in Australian languages. In Studies of switch reference (UCLA Papers in Syntax 8), ed. Pamela Munro, 1–54.
Baart, Joan L. G. 1999. A sketch of Kalam Kohistani grammar. Islamabad: National Institute of Pakistan Studies, Quaid-i-Azam University.Google Scholar
Bamgbose, A. 1974. On serial verbs and verbal status. Journal of West African linguistics 9: 17–48.Google Scholar
Barry, Randall K. (ed.). 1997. ALA-LC Romanization tables: Transliteration schemes for non-roman scripts. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.Google Scholar
Bentivoglio, Paola. 1983. Topic continuity and discontinuity in discourse: A study of spoken Latin-American Spanish. In Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study, ed. , T. Givón (Typological Studies in Language 3), 255–312. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Borgman, D. M. 1990. Sanuma. In Handbook of Amazonian languages, vol. II, eds. Derbyshire, Desmond C. and Pullum, Geoffrey, 15–248. Berlin: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical functional syntax. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Textbooks.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian, and Yule, George. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burquest, D. A. 2001. Phonological analysis: a functional approach (2nd edition). Dallas, Tex.: SIL International.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form (Typological Studies in Language, vol. 9). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Lewis [pseud.]. 1865. Alice's adventures in Wonderland. London: Macmillan and Company.Google Scholar
Carroll, Lewis [pseud.]. 1872. Through the looking glass, and what Alice found there. With fifty illustrations by John Tenniel. London: Macmillan and Company.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1970. Meaning and the structure of language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cipollone, Nick, Steven Keiser, and Shravan Vasishth. 1994. Language files: materials for an introduction to language (6th edition), ed. Jannedy, Stefanie, Poletto, Robert, and Weldon, Tracey L.. Columbus, Ohio: Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Coleman, Linda, and Kay, Paul. 1981. Prototype semantics: The English wordlie. Language 57: 26–44.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1974. Causatives and universal grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society. 1–32.
Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. In Syntactic typology: studies in the phenomenology of language, ed. Lehmann, Winfred P., 329–94. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1982. Grammatical relations in Huichol. In Studies in transitivity, ed. Paul, J. Hopper and Sandra, A. Thompson (Syntax and Semantics 15), 99–115. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology (2nd edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, William, and Rakušan, Jaromira. 1998. Source book for linguistics. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Craig, Colette. 1986. Noun classes and categorization (Typological Studies in Language, vol. 7). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 1990. Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2002. Radical construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cutzal, Martín Chacach. 1990. Una descripción fonológica y morfológica del Kachiquel. In England and Elliot, 145–90.
Dahlstrom, Amy. 1991. Plains Cree morphosyntax. New York/London: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1982. Aspect, transitivity and viewpoint. In Tense-aspect: between semantics and pragmatics, ed. Hopper, Paul J., 167–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1984. Notes on agentivity and causation. Studies in Language 8: 181–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delancey, Scott. 1990. Ergativity and the Cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics First person (I, me, we, us, etc.): 289–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1991. Event construal and case role assignment. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 17: 338–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickenson, Connie. 2004. Simple and complex predicates in Tsafiki (Colorado). Paper presented at the 30th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, Calif.
Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55: 59–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dooley, Robert A., and Levinsohn, Stephen H.. 2001. Analyzing discourse: a manual of basic concepts. Dallas, Tex.: SIL International.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1986. Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language 62: 808–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1988. Object-verb order and adjective-noun order: dispelling a myth. Lingua 74: 185–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word-order correlations. Language 68.1: 81–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. 1996. Grammatical relations in Kutenai (Ktunaxa). The Belcourt Lecture, delivered before the University of Manitoba on 24 February 1995. Winnepeg: Voices of Rupert's Land.Google Scholar
Elson, Benjamin F., and Velma, B. Pickett. 1988. Beginning morphology and syntax. Dallas, Tex.: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
England, Nora. 1988. Introducción a la lingüística: idiomas mayas. Antigua, Guatemala: Proyecto lingüístico Francisco Marroquín.Google Scholar
England, Nora, and Elliott, Stephen R. (eds.). 1990. Lecturas sobre la linguística Maya. Guatemala: Centro de Investigaciones Regionales de Mesoamérica (CIRMA).Google Scholar
Farmer, Ann, and Demers, Richard A.. 1996. A linguistics workbook. Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. In Universals in linguistic theory, ed. Bach, Emond and Harms, Robert T., 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1976. Topics in lexical semantics. In Current issues in linguistic theory, ed. Cole, Peter, 76–138. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1977. The case for case reopened. In Syntax and Semantics 8: Grammatical Relations, ed. , P. Cole and , J. M. Sadock, 59–81. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Finnegan, Edward. 1994. Language: its structure and use. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar
Foley, William, and Valin, R.. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frachtenberg, Leo J. 1913. Coos texts. Columbia University contributions to anthropology, vol. 1. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Franchetto, Bruna. 1990. Ergativity and nominativity in Kuikuro and other Cariban languages. In Amazonian linguistics: studies in lowland South American languages, ed. Payne, Doris L.. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike O. 1994. Semantic and pragmatic inverse: “Inverse alignment” and “inverse voice” in Carib of Surinam. In Voice and inversion, ed. Givón, Timothy (Typological Studies in Language 28), 186–231. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of language, ed. Greenberg, Joseph H.. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies (Janua linguarum, Series minor, 59). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Grégoire, Claire. 1985. L'expression du passif en maninka. In African linguistics: essays in memory of M. W. K. Semikenke, ed. Goyvaerts, Didier, 189–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, Charles E. 1991. Central Malayo-Polynesian. Paper presented at the 6th international conference on Austronesian linguistics. Honolulu, Hawaii.
Haiman, John, and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1984. “Subordination” in universal grammar. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 10: 510–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice C. 1990. Alignment typology and diachronic change. In Language typology 1987: Systematic balance in language, ed. Lehmann, Winfred P., 67–90. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A grammar of Lezgian (Mouton Grammar Library, 9). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2002. Understanding morphology. London: Arnold Publishers; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1983. Word order universals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1994. A performance theory of order and constiuency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayward, Richard J. 1984. The Arbore language: a first investigation: including a vocabulary (Cushitic Language Studies 2). Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Healey, Phyllis M. 1960. An Agta grammar. Manila: Bureau of Printing.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1976. Antipassivization: a functional typology. In Proceedings of the second annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 202–11.Google Scholar
Heitzman, Allene. 1982. Some cohesive elements in Pajonal Campa narratives. Ms. 20 pp. Summer Institute of Linguistics: Perú.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1984. The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language 60. 4:703–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Grover. 1999. Essential introductory linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1988. Conceptual semantics. In Meaning and mental representation, eds. Umberto Eco, Marco Santambrogio, and Violi, Patrizia, 81–97. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Wendell, and Jones, Paula. 1991. Barasano syntax: Studies in the Languages of Colombia, vol. II. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1985. Relative clauses. In Language typology and syntactic description, vol. II: Complex constructions, ed. Shopen, Timothy, 141–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L., and Comrie, Bernard. 1977. Noun Phrase accesibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–100.Google Scholar
Kimenyi, Alexander. 1980. A relational grammar of Kinyarwanda. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Klamer, Marian. 1998. A grammar of Kambera (Mouton Grammar Library, no. 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köhler, W. 1929. Gestalt Psychology. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Kühner, R., and Stegmann, C.. 1955. Ausfürliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache: Satzlehre, vol. II. Leverkusen: Gottschalk.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1977. Linguistic gestalts. Chicago Linguistics Society 13: 236–87.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: the enbodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1972. Fundamentals of linguistic analysis. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1990. Settings, participants, and grammatical relations. In Meanings and prototypes: Studies in Linguistic categorization, ed. , S. L. Tsohatzidis, 213–38. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert, and Sandra A. Thompson. 1985. Adverbial clauses. In Language typology and syntactic description, vol. II: Complex constructions, ed. Shopen, Timothy, 171–234. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert. 1972. Hierarchy and universality of discourse constituents in New Guinea languages: discussion. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. 1992. A reference grammar of Korean: a complete guide to the grammar and history of the Korean language (Tuttle Language Library). Rutland, Vermont/Tokyo, Japan: Charles E. Tuttle Publishing.Google Scholar
Marusic, Franc. 2002. Aff-stem-ⅸ: on the nature of discontinuous affixes. Paper presented at the CUNY/SUNY/NYU Linguistics Mini-Conference dedicated to the memory of Jerrold J. Katz, 20 April 2002.
Matthew, Sunil, and Susan, Maya. 2000. Dungra Bhil phonemic summary. Mumbai: Friends Missionary Prayer Band.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1982. Thirty million theories of grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McManus, Carolyn, Stollenwerk, Deborah, and Sheng, Zhang-Zheng. 1987. Language Files. Reynoldsburg, Ohio: Advocate Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Merlan, Francesca. 1985. Split intransitivity: functional oppositions in intransitive inflection. In Grammar inside and outside the clause: some approaches to theory from the field, ed. Nichols, Johanna and Woodbury, Anthony C., 324–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merrifield, William R., Naish, Constance M., Rensch, Calvin R., and Story, Gillian. 1987. Laboratory manual for morphology and syntax. Dallas, Tex.: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Minsky, Marvin. 1975. A framework for representing knowledge. In The psychology of computer vision, ed. Winston, P., 211–80. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1987. Is basic word order universal? In Coherence and grounding in discourse, ed. Tomlin, Russel (Typological Studies in language 11), 281–328. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1991. Active/agent case marking and its motivations. Language 67. Third person (he, him, she, her, they, them, it, etc.):510–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S., Rickford, John, Baile, Guy, and Baugh, John (eds.). 1998. African-American English: structure, history, and usage. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Munro, Pamela. 1983. When “Same” Is Not “Not Different.” In Switch-reference and Universal Grammar, ed. Haiman, John and Munro, Pamela, 223–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, Pamela. 1984. The syntactic status of object possessor raising in Western Muskogean. Proceedings of the tenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. Brugman, Claudia and Macauley, Monica, 634–49. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, , 1997. Resultative constructions. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62. First person (I, me, we, us, etc.):56–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 1985. Complementation. In Language typology and syntactic description, vol. II: Complex constructions, ed. Shopen, Timothy, 42–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Grady, William, Archibald, John, Aronoff, Mark, and Rees-Miller, Janie. 2001. Contemporary linguistics: an introduction. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Olson, Kenneth S., and Paul H. Schultz. 2002. Can [sonorant] spread? Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session 46. Online publication. http://www.und.edu/dept/linguistics/wp/2002.htm.
Pawley, Andrew. 1987. Encoding events in Kalam and English: different logics for reporting experience. In Coherence and grounding in discourse, ed. Tomlin, Russell, 329–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Doris L. 1985. Review of Word order universals, by John Hawkins. Language 61: 462–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Doris L. 1986. Basic constituent order in Yagua clauses: implications for word order universals. In Amazon languages handbook, vol. I, ed. Derbyshire, D. and Pullum, G., 440–65. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Doris L., and Leonard Kotikash. Ms. 2004. Maa–English dictionary.
Payne, John R. 1985. Complex phrases and complex sentences. In Language typology and syntactic description, vol. II: Complex constructions, ed. Shopen, Timothy, 3–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Judith, and David Payne. 1991. The pragmatics of split intransitivity in Asheninca. Paper read at the Symposium on Arawakan Linguistics, 47th International Congress of Americanists, New Orleans.
Payne, Thomas E. 1991. Medial clauses and interpropositional relations in Panare. Cognitive linguistics 2–3: 247–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas E. 1992. The twins stories: participant coding in Yagua narrative. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas E. 1997. Describing morphosyntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas E. Forthcoming. A grammar as communicative act. Studies in Language.
Perlmutter, David M. 1980. Relational Grammar. In Current approaches to syntax: Syntax and semantics 13, ed. Moravcsik, Edith A. and Wirth, Jessica R., 195–229. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1970. Is semantics possible? In Language, belief, and metaphysics, ed. Kiefer, H. E. and Munitz, M. K., 50–63. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Quillian, M. Ross. 1968. Semantic memory. In Semantic information processing, ed. Minsky, M., 216–70. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, and Greenbaum, Sidney. 1973. A concise grammar of contemporary English. San Diego (inter alia): Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Radford, A. 1988. Transformational grammar: a first course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, A. 1997. Syntactic theory and the structure of English: a minimalist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redden, J. A. 1966. Walapai II: morphology. International Journal of American Linguistics 32: 141–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, Michael. 1979. The conduit metaphor – a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Metaphor and thought, ed. Ortony, A., 284–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, Irene, Miyaoka, Osahito, Jacobson, Steven, Afcan, Paschal, and Krauss, Michael. 1977. Yup'ik Eskimo grammar. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center and Yup'ik Language Workshop, University of Alaska.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology 104. 5:192–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. Principles of categorization. In Cognition and categorization, ed. Rosch, E. and Lloyd, B., 27–48. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand. 1915. A course in general linguistics. Trans. by C. Bally and A. Ferdlinger. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul. 1974. A non-transformational account of serial verbs. Studies in African Linguistics, supplement 5: 253–70.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. Passives and related constructions: a prototype analysis. Language 61. 4:821–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical categories in Australian languages, ed. Dixon, R. M. W. (Linguistic Series 22), 112–71. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Skorik, Petr J. 1961. Grammatika chukotskogo jazyka, vol. I. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Stahlke, H. 1970. Serial verbs. Studies in African linguistics First person (I, me, we, us, etc.): 60–99.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1987. The definition of lie. In Cultural models in language and thought, ed. Holland, D. and Quinn, N., 43–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swetman, James S. J. 1998. An introduction to the study of New Testament Greek (2nd edition). Subsidia Biblica 16.1. Roma: Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language typology and syntactic description, vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, ed. Shopen, Timothy, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 1988. A discourse approach to the cross-linguistic category “adjective.” In Explaining language universals, ed. Hawkins, John A., 167–85. Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Heine, Bernd (eds). 1991. Approaches to grammaticalization, vols. I and II. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Tucker, Archibald N., and Ole Mpaayei, John T.. 1955. A Maasai grammar, with vocabulary (Publications of the African Institute, Leiden, no. 2). London/New York: Longmans and Green.Google Scholar
Merwe, Christo H., Naudé, Jackie A., and Kroeze, Jan H.. 1999. A Biblical Hebrew reference grammar. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dijk, Teun. 1972. Some aspects of text grammars. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valin, Robert D. Jr., and LaPolla, Randy J.. 1997. Syntax: structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Verbs and times. In Linguistics in philosophy, ed. Vendler, Z., 97–121. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, R. 1966. Clause to sentence gradations in Pacoh. Lingua 16: 166–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watters, John. 1979. Focus in Aghem. In Aghem grammatical structure, ed. Hyman, Lawrence, 137–97. Los Angeles, University of Southern California occasional papers in linguistics 7.Google Scholar
Weber, David John. 1989. A grammar of Huallaga (Huanuco) Quechua. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Welmers, William E. 1973. African language structures. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wise, Mary Ruth. 1971. Identification of participants in discourse: a study of aspects of form and meaning in Nomatsiguenga. Summer Institute of Linguistics publications in linguistics and related fields no. 28. Dallas, Tex.: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical investigations (1981 reprint). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yule, George. 1996. The study of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aberdour, Catherine. 1985. Referential devices in Apurinã discourse. In Porto Velho workpapers, ed. Fortune, David L., 43–91. Brasília: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. A grammar of Tariana. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allott, Robin. 1995. Sound symbolism. In Language in the Würm Glaciation, ed. Figge, Udo L., 15–38. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Anderson, Steven R. 1992. A-Morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arensen, Jonathan E. 1982. Murle grammar. Occasional Papers in the Study of Sudanese Languages Second person (you, y'all, etc.): First person (I, me, we, us, etc.)–143.Google Scholar
Austin, Peter. 1980. Switch reference in Australian languages. In Studies of switch reference (UCLA Papers in Syntax 8), ed. Pamela Munro, 1–54.
Baart, Joan L. G. 1999. A sketch of Kalam Kohistani grammar. Islamabad: National Institute of Pakistan Studies, Quaid-i-Azam University.Google Scholar
Bamgbose, A. 1974. On serial verbs and verbal status. Journal of West African linguistics 9: 17–48.Google Scholar
Barry, Randall K. (ed.). 1997. ALA-LC Romanization tables: Transliteration schemes for non-roman scripts. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.Google Scholar
Bentivoglio, Paola. 1983. Topic continuity and discontinuity in discourse: A study of spoken Latin-American Spanish. In Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study, ed. , T. Givón (Typological Studies in Language 3), 255–312. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Borgman, D. M. 1990. Sanuma. In Handbook of Amazonian languages, vol. II, eds. Derbyshire, Desmond C. and Pullum, Geoffrey, 15–248. Berlin: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical functional syntax. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Textbooks.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian, and Yule, George. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burquest, D. A. 2001. Phonological analysis: a functional approach (2nd edition). Dallas, Tex.: SIL International.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form (Typological Studies in Language, vol. 9). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Lewis [pseud.]. 1865. Alice's adventures in Wonderland. London: Macmillan and Company.Google Scholar
Carroll, Lewis [pseud.]. 1872. Through the looking glass, and what Alice found there. With fifty illustrations by John Tenniel. London: Macmillan and Company.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1970. Meaning and the structure of language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cipollone, Nick, Steven Keiser, and Shravan Vasishth. 1994. Language files: materials for an introduction to language (6th edition), ed. Jannedy, Stefanie, Poletto, Robert, and Weldon, Tracey L.. Columbus, Ohio: Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Coleman, Linda, and Kay, Paul. 1981. Prototype semantics: The English wordlie. Language 57: 26–44.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1974. Causatives and universal grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society. 1–32.
Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. In Syntactic typology: studies in the phenomenology of language, ed. Lehmann, Winfred P., 329–94. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1982. Grammatical relations in Huichol. In Studies in transitivity, ed. Paul, J. Hopper and Sandra, A. Thompson (Syntax and Semantics 15), 99–115. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology (2nd edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, William, and Rakušan, Jaromira. 1998. Source book for linguistics. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Craig, Colette. 1986. Noun classes and categorization (Typological Studies in Language, vol. 7). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 1990. Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2002. Radical construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cutzal, Martín Chacach. 1990. Una descripción fonológica y morfológica del Kachiquel. In England and Elliot, 145–90.
Dahlstrom, Amy. 1991. Plains Cree morphosyntax. New York/London: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1982. Aspect, transitivity and viewpoint. In Tense-aspect: between semantics and pragmatics, ed. Hopper, Paul J., 167–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1984. Notes on agentivity and causation. Studies in Language 8: 181–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delancey, Scott. 1990. Ergativity and the Cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics First person (I, me, we, us, etc.): 289–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1991. Event construal and case role assignment. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 17: 338–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickenson, Connie. 2004. Simple and complex predicates in Tsafiki (Colorado). Paper presented at the 30th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, Calif.
Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55: 59–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dooley, Robert A., and Levinsohn, Stephen H.. 2001. Analyzing discourse: a manual of basic concepts. Dallas, Tex.: SIL International.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1986. Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language 62: 808–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1988. Object-verb order and adjective-noun order: dispelling a myth. Lingua 74: 185–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word-order correlations. Language 68.1: 81–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew. 1996. Grammatical relations in Kutenai (Ktunaxa). The Belcourt Lecture, delivered before the University of Manitoba on 24 February 1995. Winnepeg: Voices of Rupert's Land.Google Scholar
Elson, Benjamin F., and Velma, B. Pickett. 1988. Beginning morphology and syntax. Dallas, Tex.: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
England, Nora. 1988. Introducción a la lingüística: idiomas mayas. Antigua, Guatemala: Proyecto lingüístico Francisco Marroquín.Google Scholar
England, Nora, and Elliott, Stephen R. (eds.). 1990. Lecturas sobre la linguística Maya. Guatemala: Centro de Investigaciones Regionales de Mesoamérica (CIRMA).Google Scholar
Farmer, Ann, and Demers, Richard A.. 1996. A linguistics workbook. Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. In Universals in linguistic theory, ed. Bach, Emond and Harms, Robert T., 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1976. Topics in lexical semantics. In Current issues in linguistic theory, ed. Cole, Peter, 76–138. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1977. The case for case reopened. In Syntax and Semantics 8: Grammatical Relations, ed. , P. Cole and , J. M. Sadock, 59–81. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Finnegan, Edward. 1994. Language: its structure and use. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar
Foley, William, and Valin, R.. 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frachtenberg, Leo J. 1913. Coos texts. Columbia University contributions to anthropology, vol. 1. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Franchetto, Bruna. 1990. Ergativity and nominativity in Kuikuro and other Cariban languages. In Amazonian linguistics: studies in lowland South American languages, ed. Payne, Doris L.. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike O. 1994. Semantic and pragmatic inverse: “Inverse alignment” and “inverse voice” in Carib of Surinam. In Voice and inversion, ed. Givón, Timothy (Typological Studies in Language 28), 186–231. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of language, ed. Greenberg, Joseph H.. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies (Janua linguarum, Series minor, 59). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Grégoire, Claire. 1985. L'expression du passif en maninka. In African linguistics: essays in memory of M. W. K. Semikenke, ed. Goyvaerts, Didier, 189–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, Charles E. 1991. Central Malayo-Polynesian. Paper presented at the 6th international conference on Austronesian linguistics. Honolulu, Hawaii.
Haiman, John, and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1984. “Subordination” in universal grammar. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 10: 510–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice C. 1990. Alignment typology and diachronic change. In Language typology 1987: Systematic balance in language, ed. Lehmann, Winfred P., 67–90. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A grammar of Lezgian (Mouton Grammar Library, 9). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2002. Understanding morphology. London: Arnold Publishers; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1983. Word order universals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1994. A performance theory of order and constiuency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayward, Richard J. 1984. The Arbore language: a first investigation: including a vocabulary (Cushitic Language Studies 2). Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Healey, Phyllis M. 1960. An Agta grammar. Manila: Bureau of Printing.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1976. Antipassivization: a functional typology. In Proceedings of the second annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 202–11.Google Scholar
Heitzman, Allene. 1982. Some cohesive elements in Pajonal Campa narratives. Ms. 20 pp. Summer Institute of Linguistics: Perú.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1984. The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language 60. 4:703–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Grover. 1999. Essential introductory linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1988. Conceptual semantics. In Meaning and mental representation, eds. Umberto Eco, Marco Santambrogio, and Violi, Patrizia, 81–97. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Wendell, and Jones, Paula. 1991. Barasano syntax: Studies in the Languages of Colombia, vol. II. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1985. Relative clauses. In Language typology and syntactic description, vol. II: Complex constructions, ed. Shopen, Timothy, 141–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L., and Comrie, Bernard. 1977. Noun Phrase accesibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–100.Google Scholar
Kimenyi, Alexander. 1980. A relational grammar of Kinyarwanda. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Klamer, Marian. 1998. A grammar of Kambera (Mouton Grammar Library, no. 18). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köhler, W. 1929. Gestalt Psychology. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Kühner, R., and Stegmann, C.. 1955. Ausfürliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache: Satzlehre, vol. II. Leverkusen: Gottschalk.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1977. Linguistic gestalts. Chicago Linguistics Society 13: 236–87.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: the enbodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1972. Fundamentals of linguistic analysis. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1990. Settings, participants, and grammatical relations. In Meanings and prototypes: Studies in Linguistic categorization, ed. , S. L. Tsohatzidis, 213–38. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert, and Sandra A. Thompson. 1985. Adverbial clauses. In Language typology and syntactic description, vol. II: Complex constructions, ed. Shopen, Timothy, 171–234. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert. 1972. Hierarchy and universality of discourse constituents in New Guinea languages: discussion. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. 1992. A reference grammar of Korean: a complete guide to the grammar and history of the Korean language (Tuttle Language Library). Rutland, Vermont/Tokyo, Japan: Charles E. Tuttle Publishing.Google Scholar
Marusic, Franc. 2002. Aff-stem-ⅸ: on the nature of discontinuous affixes. Paper presented at the CUNY/SUNY/NYU Linguistics Mini-Conference dedicated to the memory of Jerrold J. Katz, 20 April 2002.
Matthew, Sunil, and Susan, Maya. 2000. Dungra Bhil phonemic summary. Mumbai: Friends Missionary Prayer Band.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1982. Thirty million theories of grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McManus, Carolyn, Stollenwerk, Deborah, and Sheng, Zhang-Zheng. 1987. Language Files. Reynoldsburg, Ohio: Advocate Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Merlan, Francesca. 1985. Split intransitivity: functional oppositions in intransitive inflection. In Grammar inside and outside the clause: some approaches to theory from the field, ed. Nichols, Johanna and Woodbury, Anthony C., 324–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Merrifield, William R., Naish, Constance M., Rensch, Calvin R., and Story, Gillian. 1987. Laboratory manual for morphology and syntax. Dallas, Tex.: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Minsky, Marvin. 1975. A framework for representing knowledge. In The psychology of computer vision, ed. Winston, P., 211–80. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1987. Is basic word order universal? In Coherence and grounding in discourse, ed. Tomlin, Russel (Typological Studies in language 11), 281–328. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1991. Active/agent case marking and its motivations. Language 67. Third person (he, him, she, her, they, them, it, etc.):510–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S., Rickford, John, Baile, Guy, and Baugh, John (eds.). 1998. African-American English: structure, history, and usage. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Munro, Pamela. 1983. When “Same” Is Not “Not Different.” In Switch-reference and Universal Grammar, ed. Haiman, John and Munro, Pamela, 223–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, Pamela. 1984. The syntactic status of object possessor raising in Western Muskogean. Proceedings of the tenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. Brugman, Claudia and Macauley, Monica, 634–49. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, , 1997. Resultative constructions. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62. First person (I, me, we, us, etc.):56–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 1985. Complementation. In Language typology and syntactic description, vol. II: Complex constructions, ed. Shopen, Timothy, 42–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Grady, William, Archibald, John, Aronoff, Mark, and Rees-Miller, Janie. 2001. Contemporary linguistics: an introduction. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Olson, Kenneth S., and Paul H. Schultz. 2002. Can [sonorant] spread? Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session 46. Online publication. http://www.und.edu/dept/linguistics/wp/2002.htm.
Pawley, Andrew. 1987. Encoding events in Kalam and English: different logics for reporting experience. In Coherence and grounding in discourse, ed. Tomlin, Russell, 329–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Doris L. 1985. Review of Word order universals, by John Hawkins. Language 61: 462–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Doris L. 1986. Basic constituent order in Yagua clauses: implications for word order universals. In Amazon languages handbook, vol. I, ed. Derbyshire, D. and Pullum, G., 440–65. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Doris L., and Leonard Kotikash. Ms. 2004. Maa–English dictionary.
Payne, John R. 1985. Complex phrases and complex sentences. In Language typology and syntactic description, vol. II: Complex constructions, ed. Shopen, Timothy, 3–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Judith, and David Payne. 1991. The pragmatics of split intransitivity in Asheninca. Paper read at the Symposium on Arawakan Linguistics, 47th International Congress of Americanists, New Orleans.
Payne, Thomas E. 1991. Medial clauses and interpropositional relations in Panare. Cognitive linguistics 2–3: 247–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas E. 1992. The twins stories: participant coding in Yagua narrative. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas E. 1997. Describing morphosyntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas E. Forthcoming. A grammar as communicative act. Studies in Language.
Perlmutter, David M. 1980. Relational Grammar. In Current approaches to syntax: Syntax and semantics 13, ed. Moravcsik, Edith A. and Wirth, Jessica R., 195–229. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1970. Is semantics possible? In Language, belief, and metaphysics, ed. Kiefer, H. E. and Munitz, M. K., 50–63. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Quillian, M. Ross. 1968. Semantic memory. In Semantic information processing, ed. Minsky, M., 216–70. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, and Greenbaum, Sidney. 1973. A concise grammar of contemporary English. San Diego (inter alia): Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Radford, A. 1988. Transformational grammar: a first course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, A. 1997. Syntactic theory and the structure of English: a minimalist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redden, J. A. 1966. Walapai II: morphology. International Journal of American Linguistics 32: 141–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, Michael. 1979. The conduit metaphor – a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Metaphor and thought, ed. Ortony, A., 284–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, Irene, Miyaoka, Osahito, Jacobson, Steven, Afcan, Paschal, and Krauss, Michael. 1977. Yup'ik Eskimo grammar. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center and Yup'ik Language Workshop, University of Alaska.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology 104. 5:192–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. Principles of categorization. In Cognition and categorization, ed. Rosch, E. and Lloyd, B., 27–48. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand. 1915. A course in general linguistics. Trans. by C. Bally and A. Ferdlinger. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul. 1974. A non-transformational account of serial verbs. Studies in African Linguistics, supplement 5: 253–70.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. Passives and related constructions: a prototype analysis. Language 61. 4:821–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical categories in Australian languages, ed. Dixon, R. M. W. (Linguistic Series 22), 112–71. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Skorik, Petr J. 1961. Grammatika chukotskogo jazyka, vol. I. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Stahlke, H. 1970. Serial verbs. Studies in African linguistics First person (I, me, we, us, etc.): 60–99.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1987. The definition of lie. In Cultural models in language and thought, ed. Holland, D. and Quinn, N., 43–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swetman, James S. J. 1998. An introduction to the study of New Testament Greek (2nd edition). Subsidia Biblica 16.1. Roma: Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language typology and syntactic description, vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, ed. Shopen, Timothy, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 1988. A discourse approach to the cross-linguistic category “adjective.” In Explaining language universals, ed. Hawkins, John A., 167–85. Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Heine, Bernd (eds). 1991. Approaches to grammaticalization, vols. I and II. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Tucker, Archibald N., and Ole Mpaayei, John T.. 1955. A Maasai grammar, with vocabulary (Publications of the African Institute, Leiden, no. 2). London/New York: Longmans and Green.Google Scholar
Merwe, Christo H., Naudé, Jackie A., and Kroeze, Jan H.. 1999. A Biblical Hebrew reference grammar. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dijk, Teun. 1972. Some aspects of text grammars. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valin, Robert D. Jr., and LaPolla, Randy J.. 1997. Syntax: structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Verbs and times. In Linguistics in philosophy, ed. Vendler, Z., 97–121. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, R. 1966. Clause to sentence gradations in Pacoh. Lingua 16: 166–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watters, John. 1979. Focus in Aghem. In Aghem grammatical structure, ed. Hyman, Lawrence, 137–97. Los Angeles, University of Southern California occasional papers in linguistics 7.Google Scholar
Weber, David John. 1989. A grammar of Huallaga (Huanuco) Quechua. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Welmers, William E. 1973. African language structures. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wise, Mary Ruth. 1971. Identification of participants in discourse: a study of aspects of form and meaning in Nomatsiguenga. Summer Institute of Linguistics publications in linguistics and related fields no. 28. Dallas, Tex.: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical investigations (1981 reprint). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yule, George. 1996. The study of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Thomas Payne, University of Oregon
  • Book: Exploring Language Structure
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806483.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Thomas Payne, University of Oregon
  • Book: Exploring Language Structure
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806483.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Thomas Payne, University of Oregon
  • Book: Exploring Language Structure
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806483.014
Available formats
×