Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T23:03:30.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - A postscript: a harmonised European law of vicarious liability?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2010

Paula Giliker
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Get access

Summary

This chapter will consider the potential impact of proposals for the future harmonisation of European private law. From the 1980s, there has been growing support for the possibility of harmonisation of private law at a European level. Although initially primarily academic initiatives, from 1989 support has also been received from the European Parliament and Commission. Recent years have seen three major publications of European tort law principles: the Principles of European Tort Law (PETL) (2005), Principles on Non-Contractual Liability Arising out of Damage Caused to Another (the SGECC principles) (2006), and the Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) (2009). These projects go beyond a summary of existing law, but seek to establish a set of principles for future European private law. In the words of one of the project groups:

The aim of the Study Group is to produce a set of codified principles for the core areas of European private law (patrimonial law). Although the foundation for our work is detailed comparative law research, the principles which we are fashioning will represent more than a mere restatement of the existing law in the various EU jurisdictions from the standpoint of the predominant trends among the diverse legal regimes. Instead the Study Group seeks to formulate principles which constitute the most suitable private law rules for Europe-wide application.

The most significant proposal to date is that of the DCFR. In October 2009, the Study Group on a European Civil Code (SGECC) and the Research Group on EC Private Law (‘Acquis Group’) published a six-volume work entitled Principles, definitions and model rules of European private law: draft Common Frame of Reference.

Type
Chapter
Information
Vicarious Liability in Tort
A Comparative Perspective
, pp. 255 - 266
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×