Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T15:20:40.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The employer/employee relationship: identifying the contract of employment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2010

Paula Giliker
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The next three chapters will address the first element of any vicarious liability claim: the need for a particular relationship between the defendant and the person for whom he is rendered strictly liable. The most common example of this relationship is that of the employer/employee (or, to use civilian terminology, the commettant/préposé or Geschäftsherr/ Verrichtungsgehilfe). From the nineteenth century onwards, industrialisation has rendered this particular relationship of increasing significance in terms of the damage which could be caused by employees and, with the advent of insurance, the financial ability of the employer to provide compensation. At the very heart of this doctrine, in both common and civil law, therefore, lies the employer/employee relationship.

In examining the scope of this relationship across common and civil legal systems, a common starting point may be identified: control. Whether interpreted as the ability to control, instruct or exert authority over the employee, all the systems surveyed in this book perceive this element as the key characteristic of the employment relationship. Nevertheless, as will be seen, changes in employment practices, the rise of the professional and increased use of technology have diminished the utility of this test and led to its reappraisal in relation to modern employment relations. It can no longer be assumed that an employee will act under the absolute control of his superior. Employees will often be expected to act independently, show initiative, and make on-the-spot decisions without recourse to their superior.

Type
Chapter
Information
Vicarious Liability in Tort
A Comparative Perspective
, pp. 55 - 80
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×