Aarts, Bas. 2008. English Syntax and Argumentation (3rd edition). Houndmills and New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American, Heritage. 2006. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4th edition). Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. 1965. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Azar, Betty Schrampfer. 2002. Understanding and Using English Grammar (3rd edition). Pearson Longman.Google Scholar

Bailey, Charles James Nice. 1996. Essays on Time-Based Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baugh, Albert C. 1963. A History of the English Language (2nd edition). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

Berk, Lynn M. 1999. English Syntax: From Word to Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Binnick, Robert I. 2006. Aspect and aspectuality. The Handbook of English Linguistics, ed. Aarts, Bas & McMahon, A. M. S., 244–68. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bošković, Željko & Howard, Lasnik (eds.). 2007. Minimalist syntax: The Essential Readings (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 27). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Börjars, Kersti & Kate, Burridge. 2001. Introducing English Grammar. London: Arnold Publishers.Google Scholar

Bragg, Melvyn. 2006. The Adventure of English: The Biography of a Language (paperback edition). New York: Arcade Publishing.Google Scholar

Brazil, David, Martin, Hewings, & Richard, Cauldwell. 1997. The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical Functional Syntax. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. 2000. The Structure of Modern English: A Linguistic Introduction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. & Leslie, K. Arnovick. 2006. The English Language: A Linguistic History. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, Gillian & George, Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calude, Andreea S. 2009. Cleft Constructions in Spoken English. Berlin: VDM-Verlag.Google Scholar

Calude, Andreea S. 1872. Through the Looking Glass, and what Alice Found there. London: Macmillan and Company.Google Scholar

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 2002. An Introduction to English Morphology. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Celce-Murcia, Marianne, Donna, Brinton & Goodwin, Janet M.. 1996. Teaching Pronunciation: A Reference for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Celce-Murcia, Marianne & Diane, Larsen-Freeman. 1999. The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's Course. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace L. & Johanna, Nichols (eds.). 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Chafe, Wallace L. 1970. Meaning and the Structure of Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. Subject and Topic, ed. Li, Charles N., 25–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Chesterman, Andrew. 2005. On Definiteness: A Study with Special Reference to English and Finnish (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 56). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clancy, Patricia M. 1980. Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative. The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production, ed. Chafe, Wallace L., 127–202. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Coleman, Linda & Paul, Kay. 1981. Prototype semantics: the English word lie. Language 57: 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems (Reprinted with corrections 1978, 1981) (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard 1985. Tense(Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology (2nd edition). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2002. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Croft, William 2003. Typology and Universals (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Croft, William & Cruse, D. A.. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2004. The British National Corpus (BNC). 100 million words, 1980–1993. Available online at corpus.byu.edu/bnc.

Davies, Mark 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 385 million words, 1990-present. Available online at www.americancorpus.org.

Groot, Caspar. 2007. The king is on huntunge: on the relation between progressive and absentive in Old and Early Modern English. The English Clause: Usage and Structure, ed. Hannay, M. and Steen, G., 175–190. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 1990. Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics 1, 289–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dik, Simon. 1981. On the typology of focus phenomena. Perspectives on Functional Grammar, ed. Teun, Hoekstra, Hulst, Harry, & Moortgat, Michael, 41–74. Dordrecht-Holland: Foris.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2005. A Semantic Approach to English Grammar (2nd edition) (Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. & Alexandra, Y. Aikhenvald (eds.). 2000. Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Dixon, R. M. W., & Alexandra, Y. Aikhenvald (eds). 2002. Word: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Cambridge University Press.

Dixon, R. M. W., & Alexandra, Y. Aikhenvald (eds.). 2006. Complementation: A Cross-Linguistic Typology (Explorations in Linguistic Typology 3). Oxford University Press.

Dreiser, Theodore. 2008. Sister Carrie. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 1988. Object–verb order and adjective–noun order: dispelling a myth. Lingua 74: 185–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2007. Word order. In Timothy, Shopen (ed.) 2007a, 61–131.

Du Bois, John W. 1980. Beyond definiteness: the trace of identity in discourse. The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production, ed. Chafe, Wallace L., 203–74. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Facchinetti, Roberta, Manfred, G. Krug, & Frank, R. Palmer (eds.). 2003. Modality in Contemporary English (Topics in English Linguistics 44). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef

Fanon, Frantz. 1952. Peau Noire, Masques Blancs [Black Skin, White Masks]. Paris: Seuil. Translation 2008 by Richard Philcox. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar

Ferris, Connor. 1993. The Meaning of Syntax: A Study in the Adjectives of English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. Universals in Linguistic Theory, ed. Bach, Emond & Harms, Robert T., 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1976. Topics in lexical semantics. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, ed. Cole, Peter, 76–138. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1977. The case for case reopened. Syntax and Semantics 8: Grammatical Relations, ed. Peter, Cole & Sadock, J. M.. 59–81. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1992. “Corpus linguistics” vs. “computer-aided armchair linguistics.” Directions in Corpus Linguistics: Proceedings from a 1991 Nobel Symposium on Corpus Linguistics, 35–66. Stockholm: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. & Collin, F. Baker. 2001. Frame semantics for text understanding. Proceedings of the NAACL-01 Workshop on WordNet and other Lexical Resources. Available online at http://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/papers/FNcrime.pdf.

Fillmore, Charles J., Paul, Kay, & Mary, Catherine O'Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions. Language, 64, 3: 501–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Filppula, Markku, Juhani, Klemola, & Heli, Paulasto. 2008. English and Celtic in Contact (Routledge Studies in Germanic Linguistics 13). New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Finnegan, Edward. 1994. Language: Its Structure and Use. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar

Foley, William & Valin, R.. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Givón, T. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Givón, T. 1980. The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Language 4:3, 333–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Givón, T. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: an introduction. Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study, ed. Givón, T. (Typological Studies in Language 3), 1–42. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Givón, T. 2001. Syntax: An Introduction (vol. I). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Greenbaum, Sidney & Randolph, Quirk. 2004. A Student's Grammar of the English Language. Harlow, England: Longman.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. Universals of Language, ed. Greenberg, Joseph H., 40–70. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. Syntax and Semantics (vol. III): Speech Acts, ed. Cole, Peter & Morgan, J., 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Grice, H. Paul 1981. Presupposition and conversational implicature. Radical Pragmatics, ed. Cole, Peter, 183–98. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hadley, Dawn M. 2006. The Vikings in England: Settlement, Society and Culture. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A Grammar of Lezgian (Mouton Grammar Library 9). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, John. 1994. Comparative Typology of English and German: Unifying the Contrasts. London and Sydney: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey. 1976. Antipassivization: a functional typology. Proceedings from the second annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar

Higham, Nicholas J. 1994. The English Conquest: Gildas and Britain in the Fifth Century. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Hiltunen, Risto. 1999. Verbal phrases and phrasal verbs in Early Modern English. In Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English, ed. Brinton, Laurel J. & Akimoto, Minoji. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hoey, Michael. 2001. Textual Interaction: An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hogg, Richard M. (ed.). 2001. The Cambridge History of the English Language (6 volumes). Cambridge University Press.

Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra, A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56.2: 251–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra, A. Thompson. 1984. The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language 60.4: 703–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey, K. Pullum (with thirteen collaborators). 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Internet Movie Data Base (IMDB). www.imdb.com.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1986. Conceptual semantics. In Meaning and Mental Representation, ed. Umberto Eco, Marco Santambrogio, & Patrizia Violi, 81–97. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Jaggar, Philip. 1988. Discourse deployability and indefinite NP-marking in Hausa: a demonstration of the universal “categoriality hypothesis.”Studies in Hausa Language and Linguistics in Honour of F. W. Parsons, ed. Graham, Furniss, Jaggar, Philip J., & Parsons, Frederick William, 45–61. London: Kegan Paul International Ltd.Google Scholar

Jones, Sir William. 1798. Third anniversary discourse: on the Hindus. Asiatick Researches1: 415–31. (Delivered February 2, 1786.)Google Scholar

Karttunen, Lauri. 1971. Implicative verbs. Language 47.2 340–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, Jerrold. 1990 The Metaphysics of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Keenan, Edward L. 2007. Relative clauses. In Timothy, Shopen (ed.) 2007c, 141–70.

Keizer, E. 2007. The English Noun Phrase: The Nature of Linguistic Categorization. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Ernest. 1966. A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language. Dealing with the Origin of Words and their Sense Development thus Illustrating the History of Civilization and Culture. Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Krapp, George P. & Elliot, V. K. Dobbie. 1936. The Exeter Book. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, George and Mark, Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 1996. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 71). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 2001. A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics 39.3: 463–516.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (vol. I). Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1995. Possession and possessive constructions. Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, ed. Taylor, John R. & MacLaury, Robert E., 51–79. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 1997. Grammar and its teaching [microform]: challenging the myths. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics, Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Lass, Roger. 1995. Old English: A Historical Linguistic Companion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lemmens, Maartin & Dan Slobin, . 2008. How people move. Discourse Across Languages and Cultures 2004, ed. Moder, C. L. & Martinovic-Zic, A. (Studies in Language Companion Series 68), 195–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity (Language, Culture and Cognition 5). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Li, Charles N. and Sandra, A. Thompson. 1976. Subject and topic: a new typology of language. Subject and Topic, ed. Li, Charles N., 457–90. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Livio, Mario. 2005. The Equation that Couldn't be Solved: How Mathematical Genius Discovered the Language of Symmetry. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Longacre, Robert E. 1983. The Grammar of Discourse. New York and London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Machan, Tim William. 2009. Language Anxiety: Conflict and Change in the History of English. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

MacWhorter, John. 2009. Our Magnificent Bastard Tongue: The Untold Story of English. New York: Gotham Books.Google Scholar

Mahlberg, Michaela. 2005. English General Nouns: A Corpus Theoretical Approach. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mair, Christian. 1990. Infinitival Complement Clauses in English: A Study of Syntax in Discourse (Cambridge Studies in English Language). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mathesius, Vilém. 1939[1947]. O takzvaném aktuálním členĕní vĕtném [On the so-called Functional Sentence Perspective]. Reprinted in Čeština a obecny jazykozpyt [The Czech language and general linguistics], 234–42. Prague.Google Scholar

Matthews, Peter H. 1991. Morphology (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCrum, Robert, Robert, MacNeil, & William, Cram. 2002. The Story of English (3rd edition). New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Milne, A. A. 1956. The house at Pooh corner. In The Complete Tales and Poems of Winnie-the-Pooh, 2001, by the Trustees of the Pooh Properties. New York: Dutton Children's Books.Google Scholar

Minsky, Marvin. 1975. A framework for representing knowledge. Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, ed. Nash-Webber, Bonnie & Schank, Roger, 118–30. Cambridge, MA: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1992. Is basic word order universal?Pragmatics of Word Order Flexibility, ed. Payne, Doris L., 15–62. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nayuki, Ono. 2009. Cross-linguistic patterns of expressing complex events in English and Japanese. Paper presented at the Conference on Verb Typologies revisited: A Cross-linguistic Reflection on Verbs and Verb Classes, University of Ghent. Available online at www.verbtypology2009.ugent.be/index.php?id=92andtype=file.

Noonan, Michael. 2007. Complementation. In Timothy, Shopen (ed.) 2007c, 52–150.

O'Dwyer, Bernard. 2000. Modern English Structures: Form, Function, and Position. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar

Orwig, Carol. 2009. Workbook for independent language learners. Unpublished MS, available from SIL International (www.sil.org).

Palmer, Frank R. 2001. Mood and Modality (2nd edition) (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Partee, Barbara. 1977. John is easy to please. Linguistic Structures Processing, ed. Zampolli, Antonio, 281–312. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Partee, Barbara H., Alice, Meulen, & Robert, Wall. 1990. Mathematical Methods in Linguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Payne, Doris L. 1992. Nonidentifiable information and pragmatic order rules in “O'odham.” Pragmatics of Word Order Flexibility, ed. Payne, Doris L., 137–66. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payne, Doris L. and Zhuo, Jing-Schmidt. 2009. A Cross-Language Typology of Lexical Transitivity. University of Oregon colloquium, May 2009.Google Scholar

Piotrowski, Jennifer A. 2009. Information structure of clefts in spoken English. Unpublished University of Oregon master's thesis.Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word-Formation in English (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quirk, Randolph and Sidney, Greenbaum. 1973. A Concise Grammar of Contemporary English. San Diego (inter alia): Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Radden, Günter and Dirven, René. 2007. Cognitive English Grammar (Cognitive Linguistics in Practice 2). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radford, Andrew. 1997. Syntax: A Minimalist Introduction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radford, Andrew 2004. Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramat, Anna Giacalone. (ed.). (2002). Typology and second language acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef

Reinhart, Tanya. 1982. Pragmatics and Linguistics: An Analysis of Sentence Topics. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar

Roth, Eric. 2008. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (Film).

Rudanko, Juhani and Lea, Luodes. 2005. Complementation in British and American English: Corpus-based Studies on Prepositions and Complement Clauses. Lanham, MA: Rowman and Littlefield Pub. Inc.Google Scholar

Rushdie, Salman (ed.). 2008. The Best American Short Stories 2008. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Russell, James. 1989. Underground. London: Victor Gollancz Ltd.Google Scholar

Sag, Ivan A., Thomas, Wasow, & Emily, Bender. 2003: Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction (2nd edition). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand. 1915. A Course in General Linguistics. Trans. C. Bally & A. Ferdlinger. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar

Schank, Roger. 1972. Conceptual dependency: a theory of natural language understanding. Cognitive Psychology 3: 552–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schank, Roger & Abelson, R.. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1975. Indirect speech acts. Syntax and Pragmatics (vol. III): Speech Acts, ed. Cole, Peter & Morgan, Jerry L., 59–82. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Selinker, Larry. 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10.209–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2002. Contrastive FOCUS vs. presentational focus: prosodic evidence from right node raising in English. Speech Prosody 2002: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Speech Prosody, Aix-en-Provence, 643–46.

Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1988. Passive and Voice (Typological Studies in Language 16). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRef

Shopen, Timothy (ed.). 2007a. Language Typology and Syntactic Description (vol. I): Clause Structure (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press.

Shopen, Timothy (ed.). 2007b. Language Typology and Syntactic Description (vol. II): Complex Constructions (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press.

Shopen, Timothy (ed.). 2007c. Language Typology and Syntactic Description (vol. III): Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press.

Seuss, Dr. [Theodore Seuss Geisel]. 1950. If I Ran the Zoo. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Slobin, Dan. 2006. What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, ed. Hickmann, Maya & Robert, Stephen, 59–81. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spencer, Andrew & Arnold, M. Zwicky (eds.). 1997. The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.

Sperber, Dan & Dierdre, Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd edition). Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.Google Scholar

Stannard, Russell. 2005. Black Holes and Uncle Albert. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 2007. Lexical typologies. In Timothy, Shopen (ed.) 2007c, 66–168.

Taylor, John R. 2006. Possessives in English: An Exploration in Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Teschner, Richard V. & Eston, E. Evans. 2007. Analyzing the Grammar of English (3rd edition). Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Tesnière, Lucien. 1959. Éléments de Syntaxe Structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra A. 1988. A discourse approach to the cross-linguistic category “adjective.”Explaining Language Universals, ed. Hawkins, John A., 167–85. Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra A. 1997. Discourse motivations for the core–oblique distinction as a language universal. Directions in Functional Linguistics, ed. Kamio, Akio (Studies in Language Companion Series 36), 59–82. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, Sandra A., Robert, Longacre, & Shin, Ja Hwang. 2007. Adverbial clauses. In Timothy, Shopen (ed.) 2007b, 237–69.

Tolkien, J. R. R. 1965. The Two Towers. New York: Ballantine Books. (Paperback edition of 1954 original George Allen and Unwin Ltd. London edition.)Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Bernd, Heine (eds.). 1991. Approaches to Grammaticalization (vols. I and II). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Dijk, Teun. 1972. Some Aspects of Text Grammars. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelderen, Elly. 2006. A History of the English Language. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valin, Robert D. and LaPolla, Randy J.. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Verbs and times. Linguistics in philosophy, ed. Vendler, Z., 97–121. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2007. Rethinking the Coordinate–Subordinate Dichotomy: Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English (Topics in English Linguistics 55). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wagner, Jane. 1986. The Search for Signs of Intelligent Life in the Universe. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Wallace, Stephen. 1982. Figure and ground: the interrelationships of linguistic categories. Tense and aspect, ed. Hopper, Paul J., 201–23. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wanner, Anja. 2009. Deconstructing the English Passive. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warner, Anthony. 1993. English Auxiliaries: Structure and History (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 66). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wasow, Tom. 1977. Transformations and the lexicon. Formal Syntax, ed. Culicover, Peter, Wasow, Tom, & Akmajian, Adrian. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1988. The Semantics of Grammar (Studies in Language Companion Series 18). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1981 [1958]. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.Google Scholar

Wright, Suzanne and Givón, T.. 1987. The pragmatics of indefinite reference: quantified text-based studies. Studies in Language 11.1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar