Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T00:31:42.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Danish experience: one model of psychiatric testimony to courts of law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Get access

Summary

The theme of my paper, experiences in respect of psychiatric testimony to courts of law, is obviously wide-ranging and of general forensic importance, which necessitates a rather restricted delimitation. So, on the basis of experiences from my own country, Denmark, I have chosen to subdivide the subject as follows:

  1. To describe the general lines laid down by the Director of Public Prosecutions to help characterise those categories of psychically anomalous offenders in which the question of applying special measures or sanctions might arise.

  2. With the provisions of the Danish Penal Code as the starting point, I shall discuss the psychiatric criteria which must be fulfilled before sanctions, alternative to punishment, are considered applicable.

  3. Finally I shall review the actual procedure or practice in Denmark as regards the production of psychiatric testimony in court.

Historical background

By way of introduction, however, a short historical outline might be useful. Considering the small size of my country this might sound pretentious, but it is my impression – and thereby my justification – that the developments in Denmark within this field might be regarded as representative of the developments in the western world as a whole. In 1930 the Danish Penal Code was fundamentally revised, particularly as regards the provisions dealing with psychically anomalous offenders. This revision came at a time characterized by great optimism and confidence regarding the effect of psychological and psychiatric treatment as opposed to punishment, treatment being considered the most appropriate sanction for preventing criminal relapse. The ideology of treatment represented the prevailing opinion at this time among not only forensic psychiatrists, but quite a number of progressive jurists as well.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×