Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T03:53:22.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - A case for sometimes tube-feeding patients in persistent vegetative state

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2010

John Keown
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Persistent vegetative state (PVS) is the name, coined by physicians and now widely used, of a specific condition of drastically impaired consciousness. That condition is characterized as ‘vegetative’ on the basis of the behaviour of patients, not of their underlying neurological disorder or disorders (Jennett 1993: 40). This behaviour includes the following features: The patient has periods of wakefulness and sleep, in contrast to patients in coma who are in a sleep–like condition. During the periods of wakefulness the patient exhibits reflex actions and can swallow small amounts of food and water by mouth, but does not exhibit voluntary action or psychologically meaningful interaction with the environment. Patients in a vegetative state breathe spontaneously (Institute of Medical Ethics Working Party 1991: 96–97).

Vegetative state can be transient, but it can persist. This persistence becomes medically and morally significant when the vegetative state continues long enough to justify an expectation that it will be permanent, that is, if the vegetative state continues to the point that there is no medical prospect that treatment will have any effect on the patient's severely impaired consciousness. The medical judgment that the vegetative state of any given patient is permanent is based on prospective trials and clinical observation; it depends on such considerations as the age and condition of the patient and the cause of the neurological disorder, not on direct observation of this disorder (Institute of Medical Ethics Working Party 1991: 96–97; Jennett 1993: 40–41).

Type
Chapter
Information
Euthanasia Examined
Ethical, Clinical and Legal Perspectives
, pp. 189 - 199
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×