Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T07:17:08.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On-Off Intermittency: General Description and Feedback Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

M. R. E. Proctor
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
P. C. Matthews
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
A. M. Rucklidge
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

There is a large number of physical phenomena exhibiting a peculiar behavior: the system is quiescent for long periods followed by a burst of activity. This behavior is persistent, and can be characterized by intermittent switching of system variables. A general model describing intermittent behavior has been found. The simplest version of On-Off intermittency does not involve feedback of the intermittent signal into the forcing function which makes it unrealistic in most physical situations. This paper discusses a method of putting feedback into the system and its applications to simple dynamical systems.

INTRODUCTION

Chaotic dynamical systems can be grouped into two classes according to the characteristics of their behavior. One class is characterized by aperiodic modulations of already periodic signals while the other class is characterized by signals which exhibit apparently random switching between qualitatively different kinds of behavior. The latter behavior is called intermittency. Examples of intermittency are abundant in nature. They include intermittent bursts of turbulence in otherwise laminar pipe flow in fluid dynamics, sunspot activity in astrophysics, and stock market crashes in economics. A model of intermittency in terms of dynamical systems as well as a partial classification of some types of intermittency was given by Pomeau & Manneville (1980). In general, signals produced by this scenario are periodic oscillations interrupted from time to time by some aperiodic bursts of activity. Another model of intermittency, crisis-induced intermittency, was introduced by Grebogi, Ott, Romeiras & Yorke (1987). This intermittency involves a collision in phase- space of two chaotic attractors as some parameter is varied, and it is again characterized by random switching between different aperiodic oscillations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×