Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T00:23:50.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

J. W. F. Allison
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The English Historical Constitution
Continuity, Change and European Effects
, pp. 245 - 263
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acherley, R., The Britannic Constitution or The Fundamental Form of Government in Britain (London: A. Bettesworthet al., 1727)Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S., ‘Parliamentary sovereignty: Lord Denning's dexterous revolution’ (1983) 3 OJLS22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, T. R. S., ‘Legislative supremacy and the rule of law: democracy and constitutionalism’ [1985] CLJ 111Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S., Law, Liberty, and Justice: The Legal Foundations of British Constitutionalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S., ‘Parliament, ministers, courts and prerogative: criminal injuries compensation and the dormant statute’ [1995] CLJ 481Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S., ‘Parliamentary sovereignty: law, politics, and revolution’ (1997) 113 LQR443Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S., ‘The rule of law as the rule of reason: consent and constitutionalism’ (1999) 115 LQR221Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S., Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S., ‘The constitutional foundations of judicial review: conceptual conundrum or interpretive enquiry?’ [2002] CLJ 87Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S., Review of Our Republican Constitution by A. Tomkins [2006] PL 172Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S., ‘Human rights and judicial review: a critique of “due deference”’ [2006] CLJ 671Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F., ‘Fuller's analysis of polycentric disputes and the limits of adjudication’ [1994] CLJ 367Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F., ‘The procedural reason for judicial restraint’ [1994] PL 452Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F., ‘Cultural divergence, the separation of powers and the public-private divide’ (1997) 9 European Review of Public Law305Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F.,‘Theoretical and institutional underpinnings of a separate administrative law’ in Taggart, M. (ed.), The Province of Administrative Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997), pp. 71–89Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F.,‘Legal culture in Fuller's analysis of adjudication’ in Witteveen, W. J. and Burg, W. (eds.), Rediscovering Fuller: Essays on Implicit Law and Institutional Design (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1999), pp. 346–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, J. W. F., A Continental Distinction in the Common Law: A Historical and Comparative Perspective on English Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, rev. pbk edn, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, J. W. F., Review of The Idea of Public Law by M. Loughlin (2005) 68 MLR344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allott, P., ‘The theory of the British constitution’ in Gross, H. and Harrison, R. (eds.), Jurisprudence: Cambridge Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), pp. 173–205Google Scholar
Allott, P., The Health of Nations: Society and Law beyond the State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andenas, M. and Fairgrieve, D., ‘Reforming Crown immunity – a comparative law perspective’ [2003] PL730Google Scholar
Anon., British Liberties or The Free-born Subject's Inheritance; Containing the Laws that Form the Basis of those Liberties; with Observations thereon (London: Edward and Charles Dilly, 1766)
Arden, Dame Mary, ‘Human rights in the age of terrorism’ (2005) 121 LQR604Google Scholar
Arendt, H., On Revolution (London: Faber & Faber, 1963)Google Scholar
Arndt, H. W., ‘The origins of Dicey's concept of the “rule of law”’ (1957) 31 Australian Law Journal117Google Scholar
Austin, J., Lectures on Jurisprudence or The Philosophy of Positive Law (London: J. Murray, 5th edn, 1885)Google Scholar
Azo, P., Summa super Codicem. Instituta Extraordinaria (Augustae Taurinorum: ex Officina Erasmiana, Facsimile of Pavia edn of 1506, 1966)
Bagehot, W., The English Constitution, Taylor, M. (ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Baker, J. H., ‘The conciliar courts’ in ‘Introduction’, The Reports of Sir John Spelman, Vol. II, Baker, J. H. (ed.) (London: Selden Society, Vol. 94, 1978), pp. 70–4Google Scholar
Baker, J. H., ‘Why the history of English law has not been finished’, Inaugural Lecture, 14 October 1998 [2000] CLJ 62Google Scholar
Baker, J. H., An Introduction to English Legal History (London: Butterworths LexisNexis, 4th edn, 2002)Google Scholar
Baker, J. H., The Oxford History of the Laws of England, Volume VI, 1483–1558 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamforth, N., ‘Parliamentary sovereignty and the Human Rights Act 1998’ [1998] PL 572Google Scholar
Bamforth, N. and Leyland, P. (eds.), Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003)Google Scholar
Bamforth, N. and Leyland, P., ‘Public law in a multi-layered constitution’ in Bamforth, N. and Leyland, P. (eds.), Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003), pp. 1–25Google Scholar
Barber, N. W., ‘The Rechsstaat and the rule of law’ (2003) 53 University of Toronto Law Journal443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, N. W., ‘Legal pluralism and the European Union’ (2006) 12 European Law Journal306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barendt, E., ‘Constitutional law and the criminal injuries compensation scheme’ [1995] PL 357Google Scholar
Barendt, E., ‘Separation of powers and constitutional government’ [1995] PL 599Google Scholar
Barendt, E., An Introduction to Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Barnes, Sir Thomas, ‘The Crown Proceedings Act 1947’ (1948) 26 Canadian Bar Review387Google Scholar
Barnes, T. G.Star Chamber mythology’ (1961) 5 American Journal of Comparative Law1Google Scholar
Barnes, T. G.‘Star Chamber litigants and their counsel 1596–1641’ in Baker, J. H. (ed.), Legal Records and the Historian (London: Royal Historical Society, 1978), pp. 7–28Google Scholar
Barrell, J., Imagining the King's Death: Figurative Treason, Fantasies of Regicide, 1793–1796 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Bell, H. E., An Introduction to the History and Records of the Court of Wards and Liveries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953)Google Scholar
Bennion, F., ‘What interpretation is “possible” under section 3(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998?’ [2000] PL 77Google Scholar
Bentham, J., Works, Bowring, J. (ed.), 11 vols. (London: Simpkin, Marshall, & Co., 1843)Google Scholar
Bickel, A. M., The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2nd edn, 1986)Google Scholar
Bingham, Lord, ‘Dicey revisited’ [2002] PL 39Google Scholar
Bingham, Lord, ‘The old order changeth’ (2006) 122 LQR211Google Scholar
Bingham, Lord, ‘The rule of law’ [2007] CLJ 67Google Scholar
Blackburn, R. W., ‘Dicey and the teaching of public law’ [1985] PL 679Google Scholar
Blackstone, W., Commentaries on the Laws of England, 4 vols. (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, Facsimile of 1st edn of 1765–1769, 1979)Google Scholar
Bogdanor, V. (ed.), The British Constitution in the Twentieth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Bogdanor, V., ‘Our new constitution’ (2004) 120 LQR242Google Scholar
Bowyer, G., Commentaries on the Constitutional Law of England (London: Owen Richards, 2nd edn, 1846)Google Scholar
Boyer, A. D., ‘Sir Edward Coke, Ciceronianus: classical rhetoric and the common law tradition’ (1997) 10 International Journal for the Semiotics of Law3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, A. D., Sir Edward Coke and the Elizabethan Age (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Boyron, S., ‘Proportionality in English administrative law: a faulty translation?’ (1992) 12 OJLS236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracton, Select Passages from the Works of Bracton and Azo, Maitland, F. W. (ed.) (London: Selden Society, Vol. 8, 1895)Google Scholar
Bracton,De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae, Woodbine, G. E. (ed.) (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1915–1942)Google Scholar
Bracton,Bracton on the Laws and Customs of England, Thorne, S. E. (ed. and tr.), 2 vols (Cambridge, Mass: Belknapp Press and Seldon Society, 1968)Google Scholar
Bradley, A. W., ‘Constitutional change and the Lord Chancellor’ [1988] PL 165Google Scholar
Bradley, A. W. and Ewing, K. D., Constitutional and Administrative Law (Harlow, England: Pearson Education, 14th edn, 2007)Google Scholar
Brazier, R., ‘A British republic’ [2002] CLJ 351Google Scholar
Brazier, R.,‘The Monarchy’ in Bogdanor, V. (ed.), The British Constitution in the Twentieth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 69–95Google Scholar
Brougham, Lord, Political Philosophy (London: Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge, 1842)Google Scholar
Brown, L. N. and Bell, J. S., French Administrative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4th edn, 1993)Google Scholar
Browne-Wilkinson, Sir Nicolas, ‘The independence of the judiciary in the 1980s’ [1988] PL 44Google Scholar
Burke, E., Reflections on the Revolution in France and on the Proceedings in Certain Societies in London Relative to that Event, O'Brien, C. C. (ed.) (London: Penguin, 1968)Google Scholar
Butterfield, H., The Whig Interpretation of History (London: W. W. Norton, 1965)Google Scholar
Butterfield, H., The Englishman and His History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1944)Google Scholar
Butterfield, H., Man on His Past: The Study of the History of Historical Scholarship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1955)Google Scholar
Caesar, J., The Ancient State Authoritie, and Proceedings of the Court of Requests, Hill, L. M. (ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975)Google Scholar
Cappelletti, M., ‘The significance of judicial review of legislation in the contemporary world’ in Caemmerer, E., Mentschikoff, S. and Zweigert, K. (eds.), Ius Privatum Gentium: Festschrift für Max Rheinstein, 2 vols. (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1969), Vol. I, pp. 147–64Google Scholar
Cappelletti, M., Judicial Review in the Contemporary World (New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company Inc., 1971)Google Scholar
Cappelletti, M., The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Chrimes, S. B., ‘Introductory essay’ in W. S. Holdsworth, A History of English Law, Vol. I, Goodhart, A. L. and Hanbury, H. G. (eds.) (London: Methuen, 7th edn, 1956), pp. 1–77Google Scholar
Cicero, , De Re Publica, De Legibus (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1928)Google Scholar
Coke, Sir Edward, The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England or A Commentary upon Littleton, 2 vols. (London: J. & W. T. Clarke, R. Pheney and S. Brooke, 18th edn, 1823)Google Scholar
Coke, Sir Edward, The Second Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England: Containing the Exposition of Many Ancient and Other Statutes, 2 vols. (London: E. and R. Brooke, 7th edn, 1797)Google Scholar
Coke, Sir Edward, The Fourth Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England Concerning the Jurisdiction of the Courts (London: W. Clarke and Sons, 17th edn, 1817)Google Scholar
Clayton, R., ‘Judicial deference and “democratic dialogue”: the legitimacy of judicial intervention under the Human Rights Act 1998’ [2004] PL 33Google Scholar
Coing, H., ‘European common law: historical foundations’ in Cappelletti, M. (ed.), New Perspectives for a Common Law of Europe (Leyden: Sijthoff, 1978), pp. 31–44Google Scholar
Coleman, J. (ed.), Hart's Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, R., ‘A constitutional retreat’ (2006) 122 LQR224Google Scholar
Cooper, J. and Marshall-Williams, A., Legislating for Human Rights: The Parliamentary Debates on the Human Rights Bill (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000)Google Scholar
Cornford, T., ‘Legal remedies against the Crown and its officers before and after M’ in Sunkin, M. and Payne, S. (eds.), The Nature of the Crown: A Legal and Political Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 233–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corwin, E. S., ‘The “higher law” background of American constitutional law’ (1928) 42 Harvard Law Review149, 365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosgrove, R. A., The Rule of Law: Albert Venn Dicey, Victorian Jurist (London: Macmillan, 1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotterrell, R., ‘Judicial review and legal theory’ in Richardson, G. and Genn, H. (eds.), Administrative Law and Government Action: The Courts and Alternative Mechanisms of Review (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), pp. 13–34Google Scholar
Cotterrell, R., ‘The rule of law in transition: revisiting Franz Neumann's sociology of legality’ (1996) 5 Social & Legal Studies451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotterrell, R.,‘The concept of legal culture’ in Nelken, D. (ed.), Comparing Legal Cultures (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1997), pp. 13–31Google Scholar
Cotterrell, R., The Politics of Jurisprudence: A Critical Introduction to Legal Philosophy (London: LexisNexis, 2nd edn, 2003)Google Scholar
Cox, H., The British Commonwealth or A Commentary on the Institutions and Principles of British Government (London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1854)Google Scholar
Cox, H., The Institutions of the English Government; Being an Account of the Constitution, Powers, and Procedure, of its Legislative, Judicial, and Administrative Departments with Copious References to Ancient and Modern Authorities (London: H. Sweet, 1863)Google Scholar
Craig, P. P., ‘Dicey: unitary, self-correcting democracy and public law’ (1990) 106 LQR105Google Scholar
Craig, P. P., ‘Sovereignty of the United Kingdom Parliament after Factortame’ (1991) 11 Yearbook of European Law221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, P. P., ‘Formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law: an analytical framework’ [1997] PL467Google Scholar
Craig, P. P., ‘Ultra vires and the foundations of judicial review’ [1998] CLJ63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, P. P.,‘The European Community, the Crown and the state’ in Sunkin, M. and Payne, S. (eds.), The Nature of the Crown: A Legal and Political Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 315–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, P. P., ‘The courts, the Human Rights Act and judicial review’ (2001) 117 LQR589Google Scholar
Craig, P. P.,‘Competence: clarity, containment and consideration’ in Pernice, I., and Maduro, M. P. (eds.), A Constitution for the European Union: First Comments on the 2003 Draft of the European Convention (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2004), pp. 75–93Google Scholar
Craig, P. P., ‘Theory, “pure theory” and values in public law’ [2005] PL440Google Scholar
Craig, P. P. and Bamforth, N., Review article of The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review by M. Elliott, ‘Constitutional analysis, constitutional principle and judicial review’ [2001] PL763Google Scholar
Cromartie, A., Sir Matthew Hale, 1609–1676: Law, Religion and Natural Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cromartie, A., ‘The constitutionalist revolution: the transformation of political culture in early Stuart England’ (1999) 163 Past and Present76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cromartie, A., The Constitutionalist Revolution: An Essay on the History of England, 1450–1642 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Custance, G., A Concise View of the Constitution of England (London: the Author, 1808)Google Scholar
Daintith, T. and Page, A. C., The Executive in the Constitution: Structure, Autonomy, and Internal Control (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, , , Sir John, Le Primer Report des Cases et Matters en Ley Resolues & Adiudges en les Courts del Roy en Ireland (London: Company of Stationers, 1628)Google Scholar
Lolme, J. L., The Constitution of England or An Account of the English Government; in which it is Compared with the Republican Form of Government, and Occasionally with the other Monarchies in Europe (Dublin: W. Wilson, 1775)Google Scholar
Tocqueville, , Oevres Complètes, Vol. VIII (Paris: Michel Lévy Frères, 1865)Google Scholar
Voltaire, , Letters Concerning the English Nation (London: C. Davis and A. Lyon, 1733)Google Scholar
Denning, A. T., Freedom under the Law (London: Stevens & Sons, 1949)Google Scholar
Department for Constitutional Affairs, Constitutional Reform: a new way of appointing judges (CP 10/03, July 2003)
Department for Constitutional Affairs,Constitutional Reform: A Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (CP 11/03, July 2003)
Department for Constitutional Affairs,Constitutional Reform: reforming the office of the Lord Chancellor (CP 13/03, September 2003)
Department for Constitutional Affairs,Judges' Council Response to the Consultation Papers on Constitutional Reform (6 November 2003)
Department for Constitutional Affairs,The Law Lords Response to the Government's Consultation Paper: A Supreme Court for the United Kingdom (7 November 2003)
Department for Constitutional Affairs,Constitutional Reform, The Lord Chancellor's judiciary-related functions: Proposals (‘the concordat’), January 2004
Dicey, A. V., Lectures on the Relation between Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century (London: Macmillan, 2nd edn, 1914)Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., ‘The development of administrative law in England’ (1915) 31 LQR148; republished in A. V. Dicey, An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (London: Macmillan, 10th edn, 1959), pp. 493–9Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (London: Macmillan, 10th edn, 1959)Google Scholar
Donahue, C., ‘Ius commune, Canon law, and common law in England’ (1992) 66 Tulane Law Review1745Google Scholar
Drago, R., ‘La Loi du 24 Mai 1872’ (1972) 25 EDCE13Google Scholar
Duff, P. W., Personality in Roman Private Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1938)Google Scholar
Dugard, J., Human Rights and the South African Legal Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978)Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1977)Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., ‘Hart's postscript and the character of political philosophy’ (2004) 24 OJLS1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eadmer, Historia Novorum in Anglia, Rule, M. (ed.) in Rolls Series (London, 1884)Google Scholar
Edwards, R. A., ‘Judicial deference under the Human Rights Act’ (2002) 65 MLR859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eekelaar, J., ‘The death of parliamentary sovereignty – a comment’ (1997) 113 LQR185Google Scholar
Elliott, Marianne, Wolfe Tone: Prophet of Irish Independence (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Elliott, M., The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001)Google Scholar
Elton, G. R., F. W. Maitland (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1985)Google Scholar
Errera, R., ‘Dicey and French administrative law: a missed encounter?’ [1985] PL695Google Scholar
Ewing, K. D., ‘The Human Rights Act and parliamentary democracy’ (1999) 62 MLR79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, K. D., ‘The politics of the British constitution’ [2000] PL405Google Scholar
Ewing, K. D., ‘The futility of the Human Rights Act’ [2004] PL829Google Scholar
Feldman, D., ‘Content neutrality’ in Loveland, I. (ed.), Importing the First Amendment: Freedom of Expression in American, English and European Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998), pp. 139–171Google Scholar
Feldman, D., ‘The Human Rights Act 1998 and constitutional principles’ (1999) 19 Legal Studies165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, D., ‘None, one or several? Perspectives on the UK's constitution(s)’ [2005] CLJ329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fentiman, R., ‘Legal reasoning in the conflict of laws: an essay in law and practice’ in Krawietz, W., MacCormick, N. and Wright, G. H. (eds.), Prescriptive Formality and Normative Rationality in Modern Legal Systems, Festschrift for Robert S. Summers (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1994), pp. 443–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, J., A Standard of the English Constitution, with a Retrospective View of Historical Occurrences before and after the [English] Revolution Illustrated with Critical Remarks on the Nature and Effects of Despotism, Compared with the Nature and Effects of Free Government (London: the Author, 1805)Google Scholar
Finch, Sir Henry, Law, or a Discourse thereof, in Four Books (London: H. Twyford et al., 1678)Google Scholar
Fletcher, D., Voltaire: Lettres Philosophiques (London: Grant & Cutler, 1986)Google Scholar
Foley, M., The Silence of Constitutions: Gaps, ‘Abeyances’ and Political Temperament in the Maintenance of Government (London: Routledge, 1989)Google Scholar
Forsyth, C. F., ‘The provenance and protection of legitimate expectations’ [1988] CLJ238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, C. F. (ed.), Judicial Review and the Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000)Google Scholar
Forsyth, C. F. and Hare, I. (eds.), The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord: Essays on Public Law in Honour of Sir William Wade QC (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortescue, Sir John, De Laudibus Legum Anglie, Chrimes, S. B. (ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1942)Google Scholar
Fraunce, A., The Lawiers Logike, Exemplifying the Præcepts of Logike by the Practise of the Common Lawe (London, Thomas Gubbin and T. Newman, 1588)Google Scholar
Freeman, E. A., The Growth of the English Constitution from the Earliest Times (London: Macmillan, 3rd edn, 1876)Google Scholar
Fuller, L. L., ‘The forms and limits of adjudication’ (1978) 92 Harvard Law Review353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, S. R., History of England from the Accession of James I to the Outbreak of the Civil War, 1603–1642, 10 vols. (London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1883)Google Scholar
Garnett, G., ‘The origins of the Crown’ in Hudson, J. (ed.), The History of English Law: Centenary Essays on ‘Pollock and Maitland’ (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 171–214Google Scholar
Glanvill, De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Regni Angliae, Woodbine, G. E. (ed.) (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1932)Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, J., The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, J.,‘The myth of the common law constitution’ in Edlin, D. (ed.), Common Law Theory (New York: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming in 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, J. W., Fundamental Law in English Legal History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1955)Google Scholar
Gould, M., ‘M v. Home Office: government and the judges’ [1993] PL568Google Scholar
Gowan, P. and Anderson, P., (eds.), The Question of Europe (London: Verso, 1997)Google Scholar
Gray, C. M., ‘Bonham's Case reviewed’ (1972) 116 Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society35Google ScholarPubMed
Griffith, J. A. G., ‘The political constitution’ (1979) 42 MLR1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, J. A. G., The Politics of the Judiciary (London: Fontana Press, 4th edn, 1991)Google Scholar
Griffith, J. A. G., ‘The brave new world of Sir John Laws’ (2000) 63 MLR159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, J. A. G., ‘The common law and the political constitution’ (2001) 117 LQR42Google Scholar
Grosz, S., Beatson, J., and Duffy, P.Human Rights: The 1998 Act and the European Convention (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2000)Google Scholar
Guy, J. A., Introduction, Christopher St German on Chancery and Statute (London: Selden Society, Supplementary Series 6, 1985)Google Scholar
Hailsham, Lord, The Dilemma of Democracy: Diagnosis and Prescription (London: Collins, 1978)Google Scholar
Hale, Sir Matthew, An Analysis of the Civil Part of the Law (4th edn, 1779)Google Scholar
Hale, Sir Matthew, ‘Reflections by the Lrd. Cheife Justice Hale on Mr. Hobbes his Dialogue of the Lawe’, as published in W. S. Holdsworth, A History of English Law, Vol. V (London: Methuen, 1924), pp. 500–13Google Scholar
Hale, Sir Matthew,The Jurisdiction of the Lords House, or Parliament, Hargrave, F. (ed.) (London: T. Cadell and W. Davies, 1796)Google Scholar
Hallam, H., View of the State of Europe during the Middle Ages, 3 vols. (London: John Murray, 2nd edn, 1819)Google Scholar
Hamson, C. J., Executive Discretion and Judicial Control: An Aspect of the French Conseil d'État (London: Stevens & Sons, 1954)Google Scholar
Hanbury, H. G., The Vinerian Chair and Legal Education (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1958)Google Scholar
Hand, G. J., ‘A. V. Dicey's unpublished materials on the comparative study of constitutions’ in Hand, G. J. and McBride, J. (eds.), Droit Sans Frontieres: Essays in Honour of L. Neville Brown (Birmingham: Holdsworth Club, 1991), pp. 77–93Google Scholar
Harlow, C., ‘Disposing of Dicey: from legal autonomy to constitutional discourse’ (2000) 48 Political Studies356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlow, C. and Rawlings, R.Law and Administration (London: Butterworths, 2nd edn, 1997)Google Scholar
Harrington, J., Oceana, Toland, J. (ed.) (Dublin: J. Smith and W. Bruce, 1737)Google Scholar
Harris, J. W., ‘When and why does the Grundnorm change?’ [1971] CLJ103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961)Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (Oxford, 2nd edn, 1994)Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A.The Road to Serfdom (London: Routledge, 1944)Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A.The Constitution of Liberty (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1960)Google Scholar
Hearn, W. E., The Government of England: Its Structure and Its Development (London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer, 1867)Google Scholar
Helmholz, R. H., ‘Continental law and common law: historical strangers or companions?’ [1990] Duke Law Journal1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmholz, R. H., The ius commune in England, Four Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Herman, S., ‘Utilitas ecclesiae: the canonical conception of the trust’ (1996) 70 Tulane Law Review2239Google Scholar
Herman, S., ‘Trusts sacred and profane: clerical, secular, and commercial uses of the medieval commendatio’ (1997) 71 Tulane Law Review869Google Scholar
Herman, S., ‘Utilitas ecclesiae versus radix malorum: the moral paradox of ecclesiastical patrimony’ (1999) 73 Tulane Law Review1231Google Scholar
Heuston, R. F. V., Essays in Constitutional Law (London: Stevens & Sons, 2nd edn, 1964)Google Scholar
Hewart, Lord, The New Despotism (London: Ernest Benn, 1929)Google Scholar
Hill, C., ‘Sir Edward Coke – myth-maker’ in Hill, C., Intellectual Origins of the English Revolution (London: Panther, 1972), pp. 225–65Google Scholar
Holdsworth, W. S., Some Lessons from Our Legal History (New York: Macmillan, 1928)Google Scholar
Holdsworth, W. S.,Essays in Law and History, Goodhart, A. L. and Hanbury, H. G. (eds.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1946)Google Scholar
Holdsworth, W. S., A History of English Law, Vol. I, Goodhart, A. L. and Hanbury, H. G. (eds.) (London: Methuen, 7th edn, 1956)Google Scholar
Holdsworth, W. S., A History of English Law, Vol. V (London: Methuen, 1924)Google Scholar
Holdsworth, W. S., A History of English Law, Vol. X (London: Methuen, 1938)Google Scholar
Holdsworth, W. S., A History of English Law, Vol. XII (Boston: Little, Brown, 1938)Google Scholar
Holland, T. E., The Elements of Jurisprudence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13th edn, 1924)Google Scholar
Holmes, C., ‘Statutory interpretation in the early seventeenth century: the courts, the Council, and the Commissioners of Sewers’ in Guy, J. A. and Beale, H. G. (eds.), Law and Social Change in British History (London: Royal Historical Society, 1984), pp. 107–17Google Scholar
Hunt, M., Using Human Rights in English Courts (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997)Google Scholar
Hunt, M.,‘Sovereignty's blight: why contemporary public law needs the concept of “due deference”’ in Bamforth, N. and Leyland, P. (eds.), Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003), pp. 337–70Google Scholar
Ibbetson, D. J., A Historical Introduction to the Law of Obligations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Ibbetson, D. J.,‘What is legal history a history of?’ in Lewis, A. and Lobban, M. (eds.), Law and History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 33–40Google Scholar
Irvine, Lord, ‘The development of human rights in Britain under an incorporated Convention on Human Rights’ [1998] PL221; republished in Lord Irvine, Human Rights, Constitutional Law and the Development of the English Legal System (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003), pp. 17–36Google Scholar
Irvine, Lord, ‘The importance of the Human Rights Act: Parliament, the courts and the executive’ [2003] PL308; republished in Lord Irvine, Human Rights, Constitutional Law and the Development of the English Legal System (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003), pp. 111–32Google Scholar
Irvine, Lord, Human Rights, Constitutional Law and the Development of the English Legal System: Selected Essays (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003)Google Scholar
Jacob, G., Lex Constitutionis or The Gentleman's Law: Being, a Compleat Treatise of all the Laws and Statutes (London: B. Lintot, 1719)Google Scholar
Jaffe, L. L. and Henderson, E. G., ‘Judicial review and the rule of law: historical origins’ (1956) 72 LQR345Google Scholar
Jennings, W. I., ‘In praise of Dicey, 1885–1935’ (1935) 13 Public Administration123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, W. I., The Law and the Constitution (London: University of London Press, 5th edn, 1959)Google Scholar
John of Salisbury, The Stateman's Book of John of Salisbury: Policratus, Dickinson, J. (tr.) (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1927)Google Scholar
Johnson, N. and McAuslan, P., ‘Dicey and his influence on public law’ [1985] PL717Google Scholar
Jowell, J. ‘The rule of law today’ in Jowell, J. and Oliver, D. (eds.), The Changing Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 5th edn, 2004), pp. 5–25Google Scholar
Jowell, J.Beyond the rule of law: towards constitutional judicial review’ [2000] PL671Google Scholar
Jowell, J.‘Judicial deference and human rights: a question of competence’ in Craig, P. P. and Rawlings, R. (eds.), Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 67–81Google Scholar
Jowell, J.Judicial deference: servility, civility or institutional capacity?’ [2003] PL592Google Scholar
Jowell, J.Parliamentary sovereignty under the new constitutional hypothesis’ [2006] PL562Google Scholar
Jowell, J., and Lester, A., ‘Beyond Wednesbury: substantive principles of administrative law’ [1987] PL368Google Scholar
Jowell, J., and Lester, A.,‘Proportionality: neither novel nor dangerous’ in Jowell, J. and Oliver, D. (eds.), New Directions in Judicial Review (London: Stevens & Sons, 1988), pp. 51–72Google Scholar
Jowell, J. and Oliver, D.The Changing Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 5th edn, 2004)Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, E. H., The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957)Google Scholar
Kelsen, H., Pure Theory of Law, M. Knight (tr.) (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967)Google Scholar
Kentridge, S., ‘The incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights’, Constitutional Reform in the United Kingdom: Practice and Principles (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998), pp. 69–71Google Scholar
King, A., Does the United Kingdom Still Have Constitution? (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2001)Google Scholar
Klug, F., ‘The Human Rights Act 1998, Pepper v. Hart and all that’ [1999] PL246Google Scholar
Krygier, M., ‘The traditionality of statutes’ (1988) 1 Ratio Juris20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunkel, W., An Introduction to Roman Legal and Constitutional History, J. M. Kelly (tr.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2nd edn, 1973)Google Scholar
Laws, Sir John, ‘Is the High Court the guardian of fundamental constitutional rights?’ [1993] PL59Google Scholar
Laws, Sir John, ‘Law and democracy’ [1995] PL72Google Scholar
Laws, Sir John, ‘The constitution: morals and rights’ [1996] PL622Google Scholar
Laws, Sir John, ‘The limitations of human rights’ [1998] PL254Google Scholar
Lawson, F. H., ‘Dicey revisited’ (1959) 7 Political Studies 109, 207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, F. H., The Oxford Law School, 1850–1965 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968)Google Scholar
Sueur, A., ‘Three strikes and it's out? The UK government's strategy to oust judicial review from immigration and asylum decision-making’ [2004] PL225Google Scholar
Leigh, I., ‘Taking rights proportionately: judicial review, the Human Rights Act and Strasbourg’ [2002] PL265Google Scholar
Lemmings, D., ‘The independence of the judiciary in eighteenth-century England’ in Birks, P. (ed.), The Life of the Law: Proceedings of the Tenth British Legal History Conference Oxford 1991 (London: Hambledon Press, 1993), pp. 125–49Google Scholar
Lenz, C. O., ‘Gemeinsame Grundlagen und Grundwerte des Rechts der Europäischen Gemeinschaften’ (1988) 21 Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik449Google Scholar
Lester, A., ‘The utility of the Human Rights Act: a reply to Keith Ewing’ [2005] PL249Google Scholar
Levy, E., ‘Natural law in Roman thought’ (1949) 15 Studia et Documenta Historiae et Iuris 1Google Scholar
Lloyd, H. A., ‘Constitutionalism’ in Burns, J. H. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 254–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J., Two Treatises of Government, Laslett, P. (ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Loughlin, M., Public Law and Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Loughlin, M.,‘The pathways of public law scholarship’ in Wilson, G. P. (ed.), Frontiers of Legal Scholarship, Twenty Five Years of Warwick Law School (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1995), pp. 163–88Google Scholar
Loughlin, M.,‘The state, the Crown and the law’ in Sunkin, M. and Payne, S. (eds.), The Nature of the Crown: A Legal and Political Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 33–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, M.,‘Constitutional law: the third order of the political’ in Bamforth, N. and Leyland, P. (eds.), Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003), pp. 27–51Google Scholar
Loughlin, M., The Idea of Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Loughlin, M., ‘Theory and values in public law’ [2005] PL48Google Scholar
MacCormick, N., H.L.A. Hart (London: Edward Arnold, 1981)Google Scholar
MacCormick, N., ‘Beyond the sovereign state’ (1993) 56 MLR1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, N., Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State, and Nation in the European Commonwealth (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, N., ‘The health of nations and the health of Europe’ (2004–2005) 7 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclean, I., Interpretation and Meaning in the Renaissance: The Case of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Maddox, G., ‘Constitution’ in Ball, T., Farr, J. and Hanson, R. L. (eds.), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 50–67Google Scholar
Maitland, F. W., ‘Why the history of English law is not written’, Inaugural Lecture, 13 October 1888, published in Fisher, H. A. L. (ed.), The Collected Papers of Frederic William Maitland, Downing Professor of the Laws of England, 3 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1911), Vol. I, pp. 480–97Google Scholar
Maitland, F. W.,‘Introduction’ in Gierke, O., Political Theories of the Middle Ages, F. W. Maitland (tr.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1900), pp. vii–xlvGoogle Scholar
Maitland, F. W., ‘The corporation sole’ (1900) 16 LQR335; published in H. A. L. Fisher (ed.), The Collected Papers of Frederic William Maitland, Downing Professor of the Laws of England, 3 vols (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1911), Vol. III, pp. 210–43Google Scholar
Maitland, F. W., ‘The Crown as corporation’ (1901) 17 LQR131, published in H. A. L. Fisher (ed.), The Collected Papers of Frederic William Maitland, Downing Professor of the Laws of England, 3 vols (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1911), Vol. III, pp. 244–70Google Scholar
Markby, W., Elements of Law Considered with Reference to Principles of General Jurisprudence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 6th edn, 1905)Google Scholar
Marquand, D., ‘Pluralism v populism’ (1999) Prospect, June, p. 27
Marshall, G., Constitutional Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971)Google Scholar
Marshall, G., ‘Interpreting interpretation in the Human Rights Bill’ [1998] PL167Google Scholar
Marshall, G., ‘Two kinds of compatibility: more about section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998’ [1999] PL377Google Scholar
Marshall, G., ‘Metric measures and martyrdom by Henry VIII clause’ (2002) 118 LQR493Google Scholar
Marshall, G.,‘The constitution: its theory and interpretation’ in Bogdanor, V. (ed.), The British Constitution in the Twentieth Century (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 29–68Google Scholar
Marshall, G., ‘The lynchpin of parliamentary intention: lost, stolen, or strained?’ [2003] PL236Google Scholar
Martínez-Torrón, J., Anglo-American Law and Canon Law: Canonical Roots of the Common Law Tradition (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIlwain, C. H., The High Court of Parliament and its Supremacy: An Historical Essay on the Boundaries between Legislation and Adjudication in England (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1910)Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. D. B., ‘What happened to the constitution on 1st January 1973?’ (1980) 11 Cambrian Law Review69Google Scholar
Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws, Cohler, A. M., Miller, B. C. and Stone, H. S. (ed. and tr.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
Mount, F., The British Constitution Now (London: Mandarin, 1993)Google Scholar
Munro, C. R., ‘Laws and conventions distinguished’ (1975) 91 LQR218Google Scholar
Munro, C. R., ‘The separation of powers: not such a myth’ [1981] PL19Google Scholar
Oliver, D., Constitutional Reform in the UK (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Paine, T., Rights of Man, Common Sense, and Other Political Writings, Philp, M. (ed.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Palgrave, F. (ed.), Parliamentary Writs, 4 vols. (London, 1827–1834)Google Scholar
Pannick, D., Comment [1998] PL545Google Scholar
Pernice, I. and Maduro, M. P. (eds.), A Constitution for the European Union: First Comments on the 2003 Draft of the European Convention (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2004)Google Scholar
Pettit, P., Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Philipps, J. T., The Fundamental Laws and Constitutions of Seven Potent Kingdoms and States in Europe: viz. Denmark, Sweden, Germany, Poland, England, Holland and Swisserland (London: W. Meadows, 1752)Google Scholar
Phillips, O. Hood and Jackson, P., Constitutional and Administrative Law (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 7th edn, 1987)Google Scholar
Plaxton, M., ‘The concept of legislation: Jackson v. Her Majesty's Attorney General’ (2006) 69 MLR249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plucknett, T. F. T., Statutes & Their Interpretation in the First Half of the Fourteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1922)Google Scholar
Plucknett, T. F. T., ‘Bonham's Case and judicial review’ (1926) 40 Harvard Law Review30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A, The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law, A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century: A Reissue with a Retrospect (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, F., The Expansion of the Common Law (London: Stevens and Sons, 1904)Google Scholar
Pollock, F., A First Book of Jurisprudence for Students of the Common Law (London: Macmillan, 6th edn, 1929)Google Scholar
Pollock, F. and Maitland, F. W., The History of English Law before the Time of Edward I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1895)Google Scholar
Pollock, F. and Maitland, F. W., The History of English Law before the Time of Edward I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn, 1898)Google Scholar
Poole, T., ‘Back to the future? Unearthing the theory of common law constitutionalism’ (2003) 23 OJLS435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, T., ‘Questioning common law constitutionalism’ (2005) 25 Legal Studies142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, G., ‘A Romano-canonical maxim, “quod omnes tangit”, in Bracton’ (1946) 4 Traditio197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, G., Studies in Medieval Legal Thought: Public Law and the State, 1100–1322 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, G., Review of The Problem of Sovereignty in the Later Middle Ages by M. J. Wilks (1964) 39 Speculum365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prodi, P., The Papal Prince, One Body and Two Souls: The Papal Monarchy in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Rawlings, R., ‘Review, revenge and retreat’ (2005) 68 MLR378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J., ‘The rule of law and its virtue’ (1977) 93 LQR195Google Scholar
Raz, J., Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, rev. pbk edn, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J.,‘On the authority and interpretation of constitutions: some preliminaries’ in Alexander, L. (ed.), Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 152–93Google Scholar
Reid, Lord, ‘The judge as law maker’ (1972) 12 Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law22Google Scholar
Richardson, H. G., ‘The English coronation oath’ (1941) 23 Transactions of the Royal Historical Society129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, W. A., Justice and Administrative Law: A Study of the British Constitution (London: Macmillan, 1928)Google Scholar
Robson, W. A., ‘The Report of the Committee of Ministers’ Powers' (1932) 3 Political Quarterly346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, W. A., Justice and Administrative Law: A Study of the British Constitution (London, Greenwood Press, 3rd edn, 1951)Google Scholar
Robson, W. A.,‘Administrative justice and injustice: a commentary on the Franks Report’ [1958] PL 12
Rubini, D. A., ‘The precarious independence of the judiciary, 1688–1701’ (1967) 83 LQR343Google Scholar
Runciman, D. and Ryan, M. (eds.), State, Trust and Corporation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Russell, Earl John, An Essay on the History of the English Government and Constitution, from the Reign of Henry VII to the Present Time (London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown, 2nd edn, 1823)Google Scholar
Russell, Earl John, An Essay on the History of the English Government and Constitution from the Reign of Henry VII to the Present Time (London: Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts, & Green, new edn, 1865)Google Scholar
Russell, Earl John, Selections from Speeches of Earl Russell 1817 to 1841 and from Despatches 1859 to 1865, 2 vols. (London: Longmans, Green, 1870)Google Scholar
Salmond, J. W., Jurisprudence (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 10th edn, 1947)Google Scholar
Scarman, Lord, English Law – The New Dimension (London: Stevens & Sons, 1974)Google Scholar
Schulz, F., ‘Bracton on kingship’ (1945) 60 English Historical Review136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, Sir Stephen, ‘The sound of silence: constitutional law without a constitution’ (1994) 110 LQR270Google Scholar
Sedley, Sir Stephen, ‘Human rights: a twenty-first century agenda’ [1995] PL386Google Scholar
Sedley, Sir Stephen,‘The common law and the constitution’ in Nolan, Lord and Sedley, Sir Stephen, The Making and Remaking of the British Constitution (London: Blackstone Press, 1997), pp. 15–31Google Scholar
Sedley, Sir Stephen,‘The Crown in its own courts’ in Forsyth, C. F. and Hare, I. (eds.), The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord: Essays on Public Law in Honour of Sir William Wade QC (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 253–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, Sir Stephen, ‘The common law and the political constitution: a reply’ (2001) 117 LQR68Google Scholar
Shackleton, R., Montesquieu: A Critical Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961)Google Scholar
Shaw, J., ‘Europe's constitutional future’ [2005] PL132Google Scholar
Shklar, J. N., ‘Political theory and the rule of law’ in Hutchinson, A. C. and Monahan, P. (eds.), The Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology (Toronto: Carswell, 1987), pp. 1–16Google Scholar
Simpson, A. W. B., ‘The common law and legal theory’ in Simpson, A. W. B. (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Second Series) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973), pp. 77–99Google Scholar
Simpson, A. W. B., Human Rights and the End of Empire: Britain and the Genesis of the European Convention (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Skinner, Q., Visions of Politics, 3 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Skinner, Q.,‘Classical liberty, Renaissance translation and the English civil war’ in Skinner, Q., Visions of Politics, 3 vols., Volume II, Renaissance Virtues (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 308–43Google Scholar
Skinner, Q.,‘John Milton and the politics of slavery’ in Skinner, Q., Visions of Politics, 3 vols., Volume II, Renaissance Virtues (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 286–307Google Scholar
Smith, E. (ed.), Constitutional Justice under Old Constitutions (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1995)Google Scholar
Smith, K. J. M. and McLaren, J. P. S., ‘History's living legacy: an outline of “modern” historiography of the common law’ (2001) 21 Legal Studies251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Sir Thomas, De Republica Anglorum: A Discourse on the Commonwealth of England, Alston, L. (ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1906)Google Scholar
Snowman, D., The Hitler Émigrés: The Cultural Impact in Britain of Refugees from Nazism (London: Chatto & Windus, 2002)Google Scholar
Sommerville, J. P., Politics and Ideology in England, 1603–1640 (London: Longman, 1986)Google Scholar
Sommerville, J. P., ‘English and European political ideas in the early seventeenth century: revisionism and the case of absolutism’ (1996) 35 Journal of British Studies168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerville, J. P.,‘The ancient constitution reassessed: the common law, the court and the languages of politics in early modern England’ in Smuts, R. M. (ed.), The Stuart Court and Europe: Essays in Politics and Political Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 39–64Google Scholar
St German, Doctor and Student, Plucknett, T. F. T. and Barton, J. L. (ed. and tr.) (London: Selden Society, Vol. 91, 1974)Google Scholar
Stein, P. G., ‘Continental influences on English legal thought, 1600–1900’ in Stein, P. G., The Character and Influence of the Roman Civil Law: Historical Essays (London: The Hambledon Press, 1988), pp. 209–29Google Scholar
Stevens, R., ‘Reform in haste and repent at leisure: Iolanthe, the Lord High Executioner and Brave New World’ (2004) 24 Legal Studies1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steyn, Lord, ‘The case for a Supreme Court’ (2002) 118 LQR382Google Scholar
Steyn, Lord, ‘Deference: a tangled story’ [2005] PL346Google Scholar
Sullivan, F. S., Lectures on the Constitution and Laws of England, with a Commentary on Magna Charta, and Illustrations of Many of the English Statutes (London: Edward and Charles Dilly and Joseph Johnson, 2nd edn, 1776)Google Scholar
Sunkin, M., ‘Crown immunity from criminal liability in English law’ [2003] PL716Google Scholar
Sunkin, M. and Payne, S., ‘The nature of the Crown: an overview’ in Sunkin, M. and Payne, S. (eds.), The Nature of the Crown: A Legal and Political Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunkin, M. and Payne, S. (eds.), The Nature of the Crown: A Legal and Political Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R., Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Thorne, S. E., ‘Dr Bonham's Case’ (1938) 54 LQR542Google Scholar
Tierney, B., Church Law and Constitutional Thought in the Middle Ages (London: Variorum, 1979)Google Scholar
Tierney, B., Religion, Law, and the Growth of Constitutional Thought, 1150–1650 (Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, B., ‘Tuck on rights: some medieval problems’ (1983) 4 History of Political Thought429Google Scholar
Tomkins, A., Our Republican Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005)Google Scholar
Tuck, R., Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turpin, C., British Government and the Constitution; Text, Cases and Materials (London: Butterworths LexisNexis, 5th edn, 2002)Google Scholar
Ullman, W., The Individual and Society in the Middle Ages (Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press, 1966)Google Scholar
Unger, R. M., Politics, A Work in Constructive Social Theory, 3 vols., Part I, False Necessity: Anti-Necessitarian Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Caenegem, R. C., Judges, Legislators and Professors (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caenegem, R. C., The Birth of the English Common Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Caenegem, R. C.,‘The “Rechtsstaat” in historical perspective’ in Caenegem, R. C., Legal History: A European Perspective (London: The Hambledon Press, 1991), pp. 185–99Google Scholar
Caenegem, R. C., An Historical Introduction to Private Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caenegem, R. C., An Historical Introduction to Western Constitutional Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goethem, H. (ed.), Gewoonte en Recht (Brussel; VWK, 2002), Iuris Scripta Historica XVIGoogle Scholar
Vile, M. J. C., Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2nd edn, 1998)Google Scholar
Vincenzi, C., Crown Powers, Subjects and Citizens (London: Pinter, 1998)Google Scholar
Gierke, O., Das Deutsche Genossenschaftsrecht, 3 vols. (Berlin: Weidmann, 1868–1881)Google Scholar
Von Mehren, A., ‘The judicial conception of legislation in Tudor England’ in Sayre, P. (ed.), Interpretation of Modern Legal Philosophies, Essays in Honor of Roscoe Pound (New York: Oxford University Press, 1947), pp. 751–66Google Scholar
Wade, H. W. R., ‘The basis of legal sovereignty’ [1955] CLJ172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, H. W. R., Administrative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 5th edn, 1982)Google Scholar
Wade, H. W. R., ‘Injunctive relief against the Crown and ministers’ (1991) 107 LQR4Google Scholar
Wade, H. W. R.,‘The Crown – old platitudes and new heresies’ (1992) 142 NLJ 1275, 1315
Wade, H. W. R., ‘Sovereignty – revolution or evolution?’ (1996) 112 LQR568Google Scholar
Wade, H. W. R., ‘The Crown, ministers and officials: legal status and liability’ in Sunkin, M. and Payne, S. (eds.), The Nature of the Crown: A Legal and Political Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 23–32Google Scholar
Wade, H. W. R. and Forsyth, C. F., Administrative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 7th edn, 1994)Google Scholar
Wade, H. W. R. and Forsyth, C. F., Administrative Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 9th edn, 2004)Google Scholar
Walker, N., ‘The antinomies of the Law Officers’ in Sunkin, M. and Payne, S. (eds.), The Nature of the Crown: A Legal and Political Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 135–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, N., ‘The idea of constitutional pluralism’ (2002) 65 MLR317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, N.,‘After the constitutional moment’ in Pernice, I. and Maduro, M. P. (eds.), A Constitution for the European Union: First Comments on the 2003 Draft of the European Convention (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesselschaft, 2004), pp. 23–43Google Scholar
Walker, N. (ed.), Relocating Sovereignty (Dartmouth: Ashgate, 2006), The International Library of Essays in Law & Legal Theory, Second SeriesGoogle Scholar
Walters, M. D., ‘Common law, reason, and sovereign will’ (2003) 53 University of Toronto Law Journal65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, M. D., ‘St German on reason and parliamentary sovereignty’ [2003] CLJ335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, I., The English Constitution: Myths and Realities (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004)Google Scholar
Weber, M., Law in Economy and Society, Rheinstein, M. (ed and tr.) (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1954)Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H., The Constitution of Europe: “Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor?” and Other Essays on European Integration' (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H., ‘A constitution for Europe? Some hard choices’ (2002) 40 Journal of Common Market Studies563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weill, R., ‘Dicey was not Diceyan’ [2003] CLJ474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Western, T., Commentaries on the Constitution and Laws of England, Incorporated with the Political Text of the Late J. L. De Lolme, LL.D. Advocate: Embracing the Alterations to the Present Time (London: Lucas Houghton, 1838)Google Scholar
Wieacker, F., ‘Foundations of European legal culture’ (1990) 38 American Journal of Comparative Law1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windlesham, Lord, ‘The Constitutional Reform Act 2005: ministers, judges and constitutional change’ [2005] PL806Google Scholar
Windlesham, Lord, ‘The Constitutional Reform Act 2005: the politics of constitutional reform’ [2006] PL35Google Scholar
Winfield, P. H., Pollock's Principles of Contract (London: Stevens, 13th edn, 1950)Google Scholar
Woodhouse, D., ‘The Attorney General’ (1997) 50 Parliamentary Affairs97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodhouse, D., ‘The office of Lord Chancellor’ [1998] PL617Google Scholar
Woodhouse, D., The Office of Lord Chancellor (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001)Google Scholar
Woodhouse, D., ‘The office of Lord Chancellor: time to abandon the judicial role – the rest will follow’ (2002) 22 Legal Studies128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, Lord, ‘Droit public – English style’ [1995] PL57Google Scholar
Woolf, Lord, ‘Judicial review: the tensions between the executive and the judiciary’ (1998) 114 LQR579Google Scholar
Woolf, Lord, ‘The rule of law and a change in the constitution’ [2004] CLJ317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, H. and Jowell, J., de Smith, Woolf & Jowell, Judicial Review of Administrative Action (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 5th edn, 1995)Google Scholar
Wright, V., ‘La réorganisation du Conseil d'Etat en 1872’ (1972) 25 EDCE21Google Scholar
Young, A. L., ‘Hunting sovereignty: Jackson v Her Majesty's Attorney General [2006] PL187Google Scholar
Zimmermann, R., Roman Law, Contemporary Law, European Law: The Civilian Tradition Today (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • J. W. F. Allison, University of Cambridge
  • Book: The English Historical Constitution
  • Online publication: 18 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619373.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • J. W. F. Allison, University of Cambridge
  • Book: The English Historical Constitution
  • Online publication: 18 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619373.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • J. W. F. Allison, University of Cambridge
  • Book: The English Historical Constitution
  • Online publication: 18 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619373.011
Available formats
×