Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Explanatory Note on Spelling
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Legality in Criminal Law, Its Purposes, and Its Competitors
- 2 A Partial History to World War II
- 3 Nuremberg, Tokyo, and Other Postwar Cases
- 4 Modern Development of International Human Rights Law: Practice Involving Multilateral Treaties and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
- 5 Modern Comparative Law Development: National Provisions Concerning Legality
- 6 Legality in the Modern International and Internationalized Criminal Courts and in the UN Trust Territories
- 7 Legality in Customary International Law Today
- Conclusion: The Endurance of Legality in National and International Criminal Law
- Appendix A Chart of Non-retroactivity Provisions in Criminal Law by Nations
- Appendix B Legality and Non-retroactivity Provisions as of 1946–47
- Appendix C Constitutional and Other National Provisions Implementing the Principle of Legality Today
- Bibliography
- Table of Authorities
- Index
- Afterword and Update
- CAMBRIDGE STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW
- References
5 - Modern Comparative Law Development: National Provisions Concerning Legality
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Explanatory Note on Spelling
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Legality in Criminal Law, Its Purposes, and Its Competitors
- 2 A Partial History to World War II
- 3 Nuremberg, Tokyo, and Other Postwar Cases
- 4 Modern Development of International Human Rights Law: Practice Involving Multilateral Treaties and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
- 5 Modern Comparative Law Development: National Provisions Concerning Legality
- 6 Legality in the Modern International and Internationalized Criminal Courts and in the UN Trust Territories
- 7 Legality in Customary International Law Today
- Conclusion: The Endurance of Legality in National and International Criminal Law
- Appendix A Chart of Non-retroactivity Provisions in Criminal Law by Nations
- Appendix B Legality and Non-retroactivity Provisions as of 1946–47
- Appendix C Constitutional and Other National Provisions Implementing the Principle of Legality Today
- Bibliography
- Table of Authorities
- Index
- Afterword and Update
- CAMBRIDGE STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW
- References
Summary
This chapter examines how states have accepted various aspects of the principle of legality as a matter of law. These aspects include non-retroactivity of crimes (nullum crimen sine lege), non-retroactivity of punishments (nulla poena sine lege), requirement of a preexisting statutory text (praevia lege scripta), limitation or prohibition of special courts for crimes or retroactively created courts, and prohibition of collective punishments. It also looks at which states require retroactivity of more lenient punishment (lex mitior). It considers these materials in the context of the different legal systems in which they arise. It concludes with a section on the meaning of these national materials for international law.
CONTENT AND LIMITATIONS OF THE MATERIAL IN THIS CHAPTER AND THE APPENDICES ON NATIONAL LAW
The material used in this study of criminal law legality in national systems is collected in three appendices to this book. Appendix A lists in chart form the states that accept nullum crimen and nulla poena, and those that implement lex mitior. Appendix B lists the constitutional provisions, and in a few cases, other provisions, existing in 1946–47, after the end of World War II. Appendix C sets out the texts of the provisions as they exist today (or the most recent available texts). Appendix C also includes statutory and other material that has been found on these subjects in states where there are no constitutional materials.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
Unless otherwise stated, the current constitutional texts and translations are taken from the exhaustive set, Constitutions of the Countries of the World (, & eds., Oxford Univ. Press [formerly published by Oceana]
, Crimes Against Humanity in International Criminal Law130–31 (2d rev. ed., Kluwer Law Int'l, 1999); Chap. 2.c.ii.CGoogle Scholar
, 1 The Grammar of Criminal Law: American, Comparative, and International (Foundations) 18 (Oxford Univ. Press 2007)Google Scholar
, The Right to a Fair Trial under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 79 (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2001)Google Scholar
Massachusetts [U.S.] Bill of Rights, art. XXIV (1780), reprinted in Documents of American History No. 70 at 107, 109 (, ed., 4th ed. 1948)
, Direct Application of International Criminal Law in National Courts236 (TMC Asser 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, La méthode d'interpretation en droit international pénal, 9 Rivista Italiana di Diritto e Procedura Penale 757, 762–66 (1966)Google Scholar
& Louise Doswald-Beck, 1 Customary International Humanitarian Law (Rules) R. 156 (discussion), p. 572 (Cambridge Univ. Press 2005) (study issued by the International Committee of the Red Cross) [hereinafter ICRC, Customary IHL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Soviet Criminal Law and Procedure: The RSFSR Codes145 (Harvard Univ. Press 1966) (translations from this book are by and )Google Scholar
The Criminal Code of the People's Republic of China13–15, 46 ( trans., Fred B. Rothman & Co. 1982)
, The Muezzin's Call and the Dow Jones Bell: On the Necessity of Realism in the Study of Islamic Law, 56:2 Am. J. Comp. L. (forthcoming) (sec. II.A) [hereinafter Hamoudi]
& , The Law of Human Rights, 2d Annual Supp. ¶ 11.475A, p. 185 (Oxford Univ. Press 2003)Google Scholar
, The Judicial Application of Human Rights Law: National, Regional and International Jurisprudence588 (Cambridge Univ. Press 2002) [hereinafter Jayawickrame]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Jurisdiction and Admissibility Issues under the ICC Statute, in The Permanent International Criminal Court: Legal and Policy Issues 65, 77 (, & eds., Hart Publishing 2004)Google Scholar
, Le principe de l'universalité en droit pénal inernational: Droit et obigation pour les États de poursuivre et juger selon le principe de l'universalité ¶¶ 75–79, pp. 30–32 (Helbing & Lichtenhahn 2000)Google Scholar
, The Vicarious Administration of Justice: An Overlooked Basis of Jurisdiction, 31 Harv. Int'l L.J. 108 (1990) [hereinafter Meyer]Google Scholar
, Universal Jurisdiction: International and Municipal Legal Perspectives29–35 (Oxford Univ. Press 2003) [hereinafter Reydams]Google Scholar
, La competence universelle, formes anciennes et nouvelles, in Melanges offerts à Georges Levasseur: Droit pénal, droit européen 23, 24 (Paris 1992)Google Scholar
, Le conflit des lois pénales en matière de competence, [1931] Annuaire l'Institute de Droit International, I, 87, 134 [hereinafter Mercier]; Travers at 75–76Google Scholar
, Double Criminality as a Requirement to Jurisdiction [hereinafter van den Wyngaert], in Double Criminality: Studies in International Criminal Law 43, 44–45 (, ed., Iustis Förlag AB 1989) [hereinafter Jareborg]Google Scholar
, Penal Law 5737–1977 Part One9–10 (5th ed., Aryeh Greenfield-A.G. Publications 2005) (through Amendment 63)Google Scholar
, Internationales Strafrecht ¶¶ 892–94 (2d ed., 1983)
, Should We Take the Condition of Double Criminality Seriously?, in Jareborg 148–52
, Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege in International Criminal Law, in 1 The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary 733, 735 (, & , eds. 2002)(principle of legality has become “clearly and firmly entrenched in customary international law” since World War II)Google Scholar
, Crimes against Humanity in International Criminal Law 144, 162 (2d ed., Transnational Publishers, 1999)Google Scholar
, & , The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Cases, Materials and Commentary463–64 (Oxford Univ. Press 2004)Google Scholar
(trans. & ), quoted in , Soviet Criminal Law and Procedure: The RSFSR Codes 25 (Harvard Univ. Press 1966) [hereinafter Berman]Google Scholar
& Isaac Shapiro, The Soviet Legal System: Post-Stalin Documentation and Historical Commentary 4 n.3 (Parker School of Foreign & Comparative Law, Columbia University/Oceana 1962)Google Scholar
, Quesas Crimes [hereinafter Bassiouni, Quesas Crimes], in The Islamic Criminal Justice System 203, 207–09 (, ed., Oceana Publications 1982)Google Scholar
, Criminal Responsibility in Islamic Law, in , Islamic Criminal Justice 171, 175
, Punishment in Islamic Criminal Law, in Bassiouni, Islamic Criminal Justice 227, 230
[], The Sources of International Criminal Law, 15 UNWCC, Law Rep. at 5, 6–10
, Pains and Penalties Procedure: How the House of Lords “Tried” Queen Caroline, in Domestic and international trials, 1700–2000: The trial in history, volume II 54, 57 (, ed., Manchester Univ. Press 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar