Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T21:19:17.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Organisation of high risk obstetric and neonatal services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2009

Jane Norman
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Ian Greer
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Get access

Summary

Service requirements

Background: the need for change

The current provision of perinatal services in the UK is under intense scrutiny and many fundamental and far-reaching changes are in the pipeline. The impetus for these changes has come largely from the neonatal specialties, which are experiencing difficulties providing comprehensive care for very preterm and sick term infants. This chapter will review the provision of perinatal services, together with potential and proposed changes in service provision. The London region will be used as an example of service provision, but the issues discussed are relevant to the majority of regions in the UK.

Up to 10% of all newborns need admission to a neonatal unit, and 2%–3% need intensive care. In the UK we are generating large numbers of inappropriate transfers of complex cases between units, often out of specialist centres, before and after birth because of inadequate capacity in our neonatal units (Parmanum et al. 2000). The fact that our neonatal intensive care is not centralised and we have a large number of relatively small neonatal units providing some intensive care is a key issue here. These transfers cause great misery and distress to families at a time of crisis, and waste a great deal of medical and midwifery staff time. Moreover, siblings of multiple pregnancies may receive care in different neonatal units in up to one third of cases.

Type
Chapter
Information
Preterm Labour
Managing Risk in Clinical Practice
, pp. 307 - 328
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry. (2001) Learning From Bristol: the public inquiry into children's heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984–1995. Available at www.bristol inquiry.org.uk.
British Association of Perinatal Medicine and Neonatal Nurses Association (BAPM/NNA). (1992) Report of the working group. Categories of babies requiring neonatal care. Arch. Dis. Child. 67, 868–9.CrossRef
British Association of Perinatal Medicine (BAPM). (1997) A minimum dataset to support annual reports from neonatal intensive care units: report of a working group. London: BAPM.
British Association of Perinatal Medicine (BAPM). (1998) Obstetric Standards for the provision of Perinatal Care. Joint committee RCOG/RCPCH. Available at www.bapm-london.org.
British Association of Perinatal Medicine (BAPM). (2000) Fetuses and Newborn Infants at the Threshold of Viability: A Framework for Practice. Available at www.bapm-london.org/publications.
British Association of Perinatal Medicine (BAPM). (2001) Standards for hospitals providing Neonatal Intensive and High Dependency Care (Second Edition) and Categories of Babies requiring Neonatal Care. Available at www.bapm-london.org.
Buchan, J. (2002) Global nursing shortages- are often a symptom of wider health system or societal ailments. BMJ 324, 751–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, P., Draper, E., Fenton, A. and Field, D. (1995) Neonatal intensive care cots: estimating the requirements in Trent, UK. J. Epid. Comm. Health 49, 617–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambers, H. M., and Chan, F. Y. (2000) Support for women/families after perinatal death. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2, CD000452.Google Scholar
Chiu, H. S. H., Vogt, J. F., Chan, L. S. and Rother, C. E. (1993) Regionalisation of infant transports: the Southern California experience and its implications. I: Referral pattern. J. Perinatol. 13, 288–96.Google Scholar
Clinical Standards Advisory Group. (1996) Access and availability of neonatal intensive care. Second Report, London: HMSO.
Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the UK. (2002) Why Mothers Die 1997–1999. London: HMSO.
Confidential Enquiries of Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy (CESDI) (2001a) CESDI 8th Annual Report. Survival rates of babies born between 27 and 28 weeks' gestation in England, Wales and Northern Ireland 1988–2000. Maternal & Child Health Consortium, p. 83–100.
Confidential Enquiries of Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy (CESDI) (2001b) CESDI 8th Annual Report. Changing Practice-a view from the clinical negligence scheme for trusts. Maternal & Child Health Research Consortium, p. 101–7. Available at www.cesdi.org.uk.
Confidential Enquiries of Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy (CESDI) (2001c) CESDI 8thAnnual Report. Update on issues surrounding the post-mortem. Maternal and Child Health Research Consortium, p. 63–71.
Costeloe, K., Hennessy, E., Gibson, A. T., Marlow, N. and Wilkinson, A. R. (2000) The EPICure study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for infants born at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 106, 659–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delaney-Black, V., Lubchenco, L. O., Butterfield, J.et al. (1989) Outcome of VLBW infants: are populations of neonates inherently different after antenatal versus neonatal referral?Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 160, 545–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Department of Health. (2000) Comprehensive Critical Care: A review of adult critical care services. London: Department of Health. Also available at www.doh.gov.uk/nhsexec/compcritcare.htm
Drummond, M., Stoddart, G. and Torrance, G. (1987) Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health care Programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Expert Maternity Group. (1993) Changing Childbirth – Report of the Expert Maternity Group. London: HMSO.
Fordham, R., Field, D., Hodges, S.et al. (1992) Cost of neonatal care across a regional health authority. J. Pub. Health Med. 14, 127–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Greenberg, E. R., Dain, B., Freeman, D., Yates, J. and Korson, R. (1988) Referral of lung cancer patients to university hospital cancer centres. Cancer 62, 1647–52.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, M. J., Kushner, K. E., Benzies, K.et al. (2001) In home nursing care for women with high risk pregnancies: outcomes and cost. Obstet. Gynecol. 97, 982–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Information & Statistics Division. (2001) Scottish Health Statistics 2000 Edinburgh. Available at http://www.isdscotland.org.
Information & Statistics Division. (2002) Scottish Health Statistics 2001 Edinburgh. Available at http://www.isdscotland.org.
Information & Statistics Division. (2003) Scottish Health Statistics 2002. Edinburgh. Available at http://www.isdscotland.org.
International Neonatal Network. (1993) The Crib Score: a tool for assessing initial neonatal risk and comparing performances of NICUs. Lancet 342, 193–8.CrossRef
International Neonatal Network. (1997) Scottish neonatal consultants, nurses Collaborative Study Group. Risk adjusted and population based studies of the outcome for high risk infants in Scotland and Australia. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 82, 118–23.
Jennings, P. (2002) Should paediatric units have bereavement support posts?Arch. Dis. Child. 87, 40–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitchen, W., Ford, G. W., Doyle, L. W.et al. (1985) Caesarean section or vaginal delivery at 24 to 28 weeks' gestation: comparison of survival and neonatal and two-year morbidity. Obstet. Gynecol. 66, 149–57.Google ScholarPubMed
Korenbrot, C. C., Aalto, L. H. and Laros, R. K. (1984) The cost effectiveness of stopping preterm labour with beta-adrenergic treatment. N. Engl. J. Med. 310, 691–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosasa, T. S., Abou-Sayf, F. K., Li-Ma, G. and Hale, R. W. (1990) Evaluation of the cost effectiveness of home monitoring of uterine contractions. Obstet. Gynecol. 76, 71S–75S.Google ScholarPubMed
Levin, A. L. (1968) Cost effectiveness in maternal and child health. N. Engl. J. Med. 278, 1041–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
London Regional Specialist Commissioning Group/Thames Regional Perinatal Group (LRSCG/TRPG). (2001) Modernising Neonatal Intensive Care in London and the Implications for Related Services. Discussion document LRSCG/TRPG.
Medical Devices Agency. (1995) Transport of neonates in ambulances (TINA). Medical Devices Agency, London
Morrison, J. C., Martin, J. N., Martin, R. W.et al. (1989) Cost effectiveness of ambulatory uterine activity monitoring. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 28, 127–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mozurkewich, E. L., Naglie, G., Krahn, M. D. and Hayashi, R. H. (2000) Predicting preterm birth: a cost effectiveness analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 182, 1589–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munro, M., Yu, V. Y., Partridge, J. C. and Martinez, A. M. (2001) Antenatal counselling, resuscitation practices and attitudes among Australian neonatologists towards life support in extreme prematurity. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 41, 275–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, E. R., Alvarez, J. G., Richardson, D. K. and Ludmir, J. (1997) Cost effectiveness of fetal lung maturity testing in preterm labor. Obstet. Gynecol. 90, 824–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NHS Executive, Mother and Child Initiative. (2000) UK Neonatal Staffing Study-Final Report. A prospective evaluation of risk-adjusted outcomes of neonatal intensive care in relation to volume, staffing and workload in UK neonatal intensive care units. BAPM Publication available at www.bapm-london.org.
Nicholson, W. K., Frick, K. D. and Powe, N. R. (2000) Economic burden of hospitalizations for preterm labour in the United States. Obstet. Gynecol. 96, 95–101.Google ScholarPubMed
Northern Neonatal Network. (1993) Requirements for neonatal cots. Arch. Dis. Child. 68, 544–9.CrossRef
Palmer, S., Byford, S. and Raftery, J. (1999) Types of economic evaluation. BMJ 318, 1349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parmanum, J., Field, D., Rennie, J. and Steer, P. (2000) National census of availability of neonatal intensive care. BMJ 321, 727–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrou, S. (2003) Economic consequences of preterm birth and low birthweight. BJOG 110 (suppl20), 17–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rankin, J., Wright, C. and Lind, T. (2002) Cross sectional survey of parents' experience and views of the post-mortem findings. BMJ 324, 816–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH). (1997) Withholding or Withdrawing Life Saving Treatment in Children- A Framework for Practice. Pub Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH). Specialist Advisory Committee for Neonatal Medicine. (2001) sub-specialty training in neonatal medicine v. 2.2, available at http://www.rcpch.ac.uk/publications/education_and_ training_documents/HST/subspecialty_training_in_neonatal_medicine_oct_2001.pdf
Sanders, M. R., Donohue, P. K., Oberdorf, M. A., Rosenkrantz, T. S. and Allen, M. C. (1995) Perceptions of the limit of viability: neonatologists' attitudes toward extremely preterm infants. J. Perinatol. 15, 494–502.Google ScholarPubMed
Scott, C. L., Chavez, G. F., Atrash, H. K.et al. (1997) Hospitalizations for severe complications of pregnancy, 1987–1992. Obstet. Gynecol. 90, 225–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shann, F. A. (1994) Review of the report ‘The Care of Critically Ill Children’. In A Critical Appraisal of the Care of Critically Ill Children. York: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.Google Scholar
The Royal Liverpool Children's Hospital Inquiry Report (Alder Hey). (2001) London: The Stationary Office.
Waterstone, N., Bewley, S. and Wolfe, C. (2001) Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case control study. BMJ 322, 1089–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittle, M., Cavenagh, A. G. M., Halliday, H. L.et al. (1994) Minimum Standards of Care in Labour, pp. 1–28. London: RCOG.Google Scholar
Wolf, H., Schaap, A. H., Bruinse, H. W.et al. (1999) Vaginal delivery compared with caesarean section in early preterm breech delivery: a comparison of long term outcome. BJOG 106, 486–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, G. L. (1994) The place of birth. In Chamberlain, G. and Patel, N., eds., The Future of the Maternity Services, London: RCOG.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×