Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T16:14:45.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11.1 - Nursing perspectives on withholding food and fluids in pediatrics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2009

Joy Penticuff
Affiliation:
Ph.D., R.N., F.A.A.N. School of Nursing, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78701, USA
Lorry R. Frankel
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Amnon Goldworth
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Mary V. Rorty
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
William A. Silverman
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Get access

Summary

Introduction

There are few ethical dilemmas in the care of sick children more difficult than the dilemma of deciding to withhold food and fluids. This chapter presents such a case and discusses the ethical, psychological, and organizational issues it raised. In addition, the experiences and perspectives of the nurses in the case are discussed.

The case

Latasha was 18 months old when her medical condition necessitated the decision of whether to withhold artificial food and fluids. She had been born prematurely, at 30 weeks gestational age, and in the second week of life had developed necrotizing enterocolitis. Surgery to remove affected bowel left Latasha with a minimal amount of bowel function and she required continuous hyperalimentation (intravenous fluid that does not require digestion) to sustain life. It was estimated that less than 10% of her nutritional needs could be met through oral nutrition. A central hyperalimentation line was surgically placed and Latasha was discharged home.

Over the next year Latasha developed multiple infections of the central line and was repeatedly hospitalized for line replacement and treatment of sepsis. Over time, her liver function deteriorated and she became jaundiced. In the month prior to her case being brought to the pediatric ethics committee, Latasha developed total lower-body paralysis in association with central nervous system changes resembling multiple infarcts.

At the time that her case was brought to the ethics committee, Latasha had been hospitalized for about two months.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ethical Dilemmas in Pediatrics
Cases and Commentaries
, pp. 239 - 245
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×