Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T05:28:34.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - External beam radiotherapy for the treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2009

David MacVicar
Affiliation:
Royal Marsden Hospital
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Options for the radical treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer have traditionally been radical cystectomy or external beam radiotherapy. For many, cystectomy has been the preferred option, with radiotherapy given for medically inoperable cases [1]. Although no randomized comparison of the two treatments exists, outcomes with radiotherapy have historically been seen to be inferior [2–4]. This may have been owing to negative case selection, i.e. cases given radiotherapy being medically less fit or with poorer prognosis, and issues with stage migration in the comparison of clinically versus pathologically staged patients. More recent series, combining advances in systemic therapy and radiotherapy treatment planning and delivery, suggest comparable results to cystectomy [5–10]. The concept of selective bladder preservation is now gaining appeal, whereby radical treatment options are determined by the tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. As a result, more patients are undergoing radical radiotherapy and organ preservation.

Radiotherapy as a radical treatment for bladder cancer involves the delivery of a dose (“fraction”) of high-energy X-rays (usually with peak voltage of 6–10 MV) to the target region of the bladder. This is repeated daily for four to six weeks to achieve a tumouricidal dose of radiation to the tumor itself while sparing surrounding normal tissue. The delivery of radiotherapy is technically demanding because of day-to-day variations in bladder filling, resulting in changes in bladder size and position, which must be accounted for to avoid geographic miss.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bales, G T, Kim, H, Steinberg, G D. Surgical therapy for locally advanced bladder cancer. Semin Oncol 1996; 23: 605–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Shelley, M D, Barber, J, Wilt, T, Mason, M D. Surgery versus radiotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; 1: CD002079.Google Scholar
Gospodarowicz, M K, Hawkins, N V, Rawlings, G Aet al. Radical radiotherapy for muscle invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: failure analysis. J Urol 1989; 142: 1448–53; discussion 1453–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, W, Quilty, P M. The results of a series of 963 patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder primarily treated by radical megavoltage X-ray therapy. Radiother Oncol 1986; 7: 299–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunst, J, Diestelhorst, A, Kuhn, Ret al. Organ-sparing treatment in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2005; 181: 632–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodel, C, Grabenbauer, G G, Kuhn, Ret al. Organ preservation in patients with invasive bladder cancer: initial results of an intensified protocol of transurethral surgery and radiation therapy plus concurrent cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 52: 1303–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shipley, W U, Kaufman, D S, Zehr, Eet al. Selective bladder preservation by combined modality protocol treatment: long-term outcomes of 190 patients with invasive bladder cancer. Urology 2002; 60: 62–7; discussion 67–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shipley, W U, Winter, K A, Kaufman, D Set al. Phase III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with invasive bladder cancer treated with selective bladder preservation by combined radiation therapy and chemotherapy: initial results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 89–03. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 3576–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tester, W, Porter, A, Asbell, Set al. Combined modality program with possible organ preservation for invasive bladder carcinoma: results of RTOG protocol 85–12. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993; 25: 783–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Housset, M, Maulard, C, Chretien, Yet al. Combined radiation and chemotherapy for invasive transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 2150–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prout, G R, Griffin, P P, Shipley, W U. Bladder carcinoma as a systemic disease. Cancer 1979; 43: 2532–9.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sternberg, C N, Pansadoro, V, Calabro, Fet al. Can patient selection for bladder preservation be based on response to chemotherapy? Cancer 2003; 97: 1644–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Housset, M, Dufour, B, Durdux, Cet al. Concurrent radio-chemotherapy in infiltrating cancer of the bladder: a new therapeutic approach? Cancer Radiother 1998; 2(suppl 1): 67s–72s.Google ScholarPubMed
Chauvet, B, Felix-Faure, C, Davin, J Let al. Results of long-term treatment of inoperable cancer of the bladder with cisplatin and concurrent irradiation: prognostic factors of local control and survival. Cancer Radiother 1998; 2(suppl 1): 85s–91s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppin, C, Gospodarowicz, M. The NCI-Canada trial of concurrent cisplatin and radiotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Prog Clin Biol Res 1990; 353: 75–83.Google ScholarPubMed
A randomised phase III study of radiotherapy with and without synchronous chemotherapy in muscle invasive bladder cancer – BC2001, www.bc2001.org.uk
Shipley, W U, Rose, M A. Bladder cancer. The selection of patients for treatment by full-dose irradiation. Cancer 1985; 55(9 suppl): 2278–84.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quilty, P M, Kerr, G R, Duncan, W. Prognostic indices for bladder cancer: an analysis of patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder primarily treated by radical megavoltage X-ray therapy. Radiother Oncol 1986; 7: 311–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodel, C, Grabenbauer, G G, Kuhn, Ret al. Combined-modality treatment and selective organ preservation in invasive bladder cancer: long-term results. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 3061–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacVicar, A D. Bladder cancer staging. BJU Int 2000; 86(suppl 1): 111–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, P, Collins, C D, Ryder, W Det al. Relationship of MRI and clinical staging to outcome in invasive bladder cancer treated by radiotherapy. Clin Radiol 2000; 55: 301–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drieskens, O, Oyen, R, Poppel, Het al. FDG-PET for preoperative staging of bladder cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005; 32: 1412–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherif, A, Garske, U, Torre, M, Thorne, M. Hybrid SPECT-CT: an additional technique for sentinel node detection of patients with invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2006; 50: 83–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sengelov, L, der Maase, H.Radiotherapy in bladder cancer. Radiother Oncol 1999; 52: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowan, R A, McBain, C A, Ryder, W Det al. Radiotherapy for muscle-invasive carcinoma of the bladder: results of a randomized trial comparing conventional whole bladder with dose-escalated partial bladder radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 59: 197–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werf-Messing, B, Menon, R S, Hop, W C. Carcinoma of the urinary bladder category T3NxMo treated by the combination of radium implant and external irradiation: second report. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1983; 9: 177–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emami, B, Lyman, J, Brown, Aet al. Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991; 21: 109–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mangar, S A, Foo, K, Norman, Aet al. Evaluating the effect of reducing the high-dose volume on the toxicity of radiotherapy in the treatment of bladder cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2006; 18: 466–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pos, F J, Tienhoven, G, Hulshof, M Cet al. Concomitant boost radiotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Radiother Oncol 2003; 68: 75–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yavuz, A A, Uavuz, M N, Ozgur, G Ket al. Accelerated superfractionated radiotherapy with concomitant boost for invasive bladder cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 56: 734–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muren, L P, Redpath, A T, McLaren, Det al. A concomitant tumour boost in bladder irradiation: patient suitability and the potential of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2006; 80: 98–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothwell, R I, Ash, D V, Jones, W G. Radiation treatment planning for bladder cancer: a comparison of cystogram localisation with computed tomography. Clin Radiol 1983; 34: 103–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meijer, G J, Rasch, C, Remeijer, P, Lebesque, J V. Three-dimensional analysis of delineation errors, setup errors, and organ motion during radiotherapy of bladder cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 55: 1277–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Logue, J P, Sharrock, C L, Cowan, R Aet al. Clinical variability of target volume description in conformal radiotherapy planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 41: 929–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkins, A C, Price, H M, Cox, D Jet al. Ultrasound in the localisation of bladder tumours for radiotherapy treatment planning. Br J Radiol 1984; 57: 241–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lotz, H T, Remeijer, P, Herk, Met al. A model to predict bladder shapes from changes in bladder and rectal filling. Med Phys 2004; 31: 1415–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, S L, Swindell, R, Bowl, Net al. Bladder movement during radiation therapy for bladder cancer: implications for treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 39: 355–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muren, L P, Smaaland, R, Dahl, O. Organ motion, set-up variation and treatment margins in radical radiotherapy of urinary bladder cancer. Radiother Oncol 2003; 69: 291–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lotz, H T, Herk, M, Betgen, Aet al. Reproducibility of the bladder shape and bladder shape changes during filling. Med Phys 2005; 32: 2590–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pos, F J, Koedooder, K, Hulshof, M Cet al. Influence of bladder and rectal volume on spatial variability of a bladder tumor during radical radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 55: 835–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sur, R K, Clinkard, J, Jones, W Get al. Changes in target volume during radiotherapy treatment of invasive bladder carcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 1993; 5: 30–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fokdal, L, Honore, H, Hoyer, Met al. Impact of changes in bladder and rectal filling volume on organ motion and dose distribution of the bladder in radiotherapy for urinary bladder cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 59: 436–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lotz, H T, Pos, F J, Hulshof, M Cet al. Tumor motion and deformation during external radiotherapy of bladder cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 64: 1551–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McBain, C A, Buckley, D L, Amer, Aet al. Optimising bladder radiotherapy: MR assessment of time-dependant organ motion. Clin Oncol 2003; 15(suppl 2): S13.Google Scholar
Mangar, S, Huddart, R, Sohaib, Aet al. Assessing intrafractional bladder motion using cine-MRI as initial methodology for Predictive Organ Localization (POLO) in radiotherapy for bladder cancer. Radiother Oncol 2007; 85: 207–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, C L, Slade, S, Mason, M D, Burnett, N G. Accuracy of patient positioning during radiotherapy for bladder and brain tumours. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 1999; 11: 93–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huddart, R A, Nahum, A, Neal, Aet al. Accuracy of pelvic radiotherapy: prospective analysis of 90 patients in a randomised trial of blocked versus standard radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 1996; 39: 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dearnaley, D P, Khoo, V S, Norman, A Ret al. Comparison of radiation side-effects of conformal and conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 267–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Budgell, G J, Mott, J H, Logue, J P, Hounsell, A R. Clinical implementation of dynamic multileaf collimation for compensated bladder treatments. Radiother Oncol 2001; 59: 31–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maciejewski, B, Majewski, S. Dose fractionation and tumour repopulation in radiotherapy for bladder cancer. Radiother Oncol 1991; 21: 163–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, R. The results of treatment of cancer of the bladder: a clinical contribution to radiobiology. Clin Radiol 1975; 26: 67–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Majewski, W, Maciejewski, B, Majewski, Set al. Clinical radiobiology of stage T2-T3 bladder cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 60: 60–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pos, F J, Hart, G, Schneider, C, Sminia, P. Radical radiotherapy for invasive bladder cancer: what dose and fractionation schedule to choose? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 64: 1168–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moonen, L, vd Voet, H, Nijs, Ret al. Muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with external beam radiation: influence of total dose, overall treatment time, and treatment interruption on local control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998; 42: 525–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horwich, A, Dearnaley, D, Huddart, Ret al. A randomized trial of accelerated radiotherapy for localised invasive bladder cancer. Radiother Oncol 2005; 75: 34–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moonen, L, Voet, H, Horenblas, S, Bartelink, H. A feasibility study of accelerated fractionation in radiotherapy of carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 37: 537–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scholten, A N, Leer, J W, Collins, C Det al. Hypofractionated radiotherapy for invasive bladder cancer. Radiother Oncol 1997; 43: 163–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagan, M P, Winter, K A, Kaufman, D Set al. RTOG 97–06: initial report of a phase I-II trial of selective bladder conservation using TURBT, twice-daily accelerated irradiation sensitized with cisplatin, and adjuvant MCV combination chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 57: 665–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zouhair, A, Oszahin, M, Schneider, Det al. Invasive bladder carcinoma: a pilot study of conservative treatment with accelerated radiotherapy and concomitant cisplatin. Int J Cancer 2001; 96: 350–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruchala, K J, Olivera, G H, Schloesser, E A, Mackie, T. Megavoltage CT on a tomotherapy system. Phys Med Biol 1999; 44: 2597–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaffray, D, Kupelian, P, Djemil, T, Macklis, R M. Review of image-guided radiation therapy. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2007; 7: 89–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Letourneau, D, Wong, R, Moseley, Det al. Online planning and delivery technique for radiotherapy of spinal metastases using cone-beam CT: image quality and system performance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 67: 1229–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McBain, C A, Henry, A M, Sykes, Jet al. X-ray volumetric imaging in image-guided radiotherapy: the new standard in on-treatment imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 64: 625–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yan, D, Lockman, D, Brabbins, Det al. An off-line strategy for constructing a patient-specific planning target volume in adaptive treatment process for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 48: 289–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brabbins, D, Martinez, A, Yan, Det al. A dose-escalation trial with the adaptive radiotherapy process as a delivery system in localized prostate cancer: analysis of chronic toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 61: 400–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vargas, C, Yan, D, Kestin, L Let al. Phase II dose escalation study of image-guided adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer: use of dose-volume constraints to achieve rectal isotoxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 63: 141–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nuver, T T, Hoogeman, M S, Remeijer, Pet al. An adaptive off-line procedure for radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 67: 1559–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pos, F J, Hulshof, M, Lebesque, Jet al. Adaptive radiotherapy for invasive bladder cancer: a feasibility study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 64: 862–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burridge, N, Amer, A, Marchant, Tet al. Online adaptive radiotherapy of the bladder: small bowel irradiated-volume reduction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 66: 892–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Court, L E, Tishler, R B, Petit, Jet al. Automatic online adaptive radiation therapy techniques for targets with significant shape change: a feasibility study. Phys Med Biol 2006; 51: 2493–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Court, L E, Dong, L, Lee, A Ket al. An automatic CT-guided adaptive radiation therapy technique by online modification of multileaf collimator leaf positions for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 62: 154–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tonoli, S, Bertoni, F, Stefani, Aet al. Radical radiotherapy for bladder cancer: retrospective analysis of a series of 459 patients treated in an Italian institution. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2006; 18: 52–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, D B, Morrey, D, Mason, M D. Hypofractionated radiotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer in the elderly. Radiother Oncol 1997; 43: 171–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rostom, A Y, Tahir, S, Gershuny, A Ret al. Once weekly irradiation for carcinoma of the bladder. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996; 35: 289–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duchesne, G M, Bolger, J J, Griffiths, G Oet al. A randomized trial of hypofractionated schedules of palliative radiotherapy in the management of bladder carcinoma: results of medical research council trial BA09. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 47: 379–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmang, S, Borghede, G.Early complications and survival following short-term palliative radiotherapy in invasive bladder carcinoma. J Urol 1996; 155: 100–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×