Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T05:07:41.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Imaging in the diagnosis of bladder cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2009

David MacVicar
Affiliation:
Royal Marsden Hospital
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The diagnosis of bladder cancer is histopathological and biopsy material is readily obtained at cystoscopy. Imaging does, however, have a number of roles complementing cystoscopy in evaluating the bladder for the detection and characterization of any bladder lesion and also in evaluating the upper tracts. In this chapter we review imaging techniques and the role of imaging in the diagnosis of bladder cancer.

Clinical presentation and management

Bladder cancer may be diagnosed in a variety of clinical scenarios. The commonest presenting symptom is painless macroscopic hematuria. Lower urinary tract symptoms such as dysuria, urgency or frequency are also common. Occasionally, the diagnosis may be made incidentally on imaging for an unrelated problem or it may be that metastatic disease (see Chapter 5) precipitates the initial clinical presentation of bladder cancer, e.g., cachexia or pain from bone metastasis, but this is very unusual.

Hematuria

Hematuria is a common urological symptom with a wide range of causes from pre-renal disorders such as coagulation dysfunction to renal and bladder causes. Painless macroscopic hematuria should be assumed to be secondary to a bladder tumor unless proven otherwise as over 80% of patients with bladder cancer present in this way [1]. Between the ages of 40 and 49 years, 16% of men with macroscopic hematuria have a urological cancer and in men between 50 and 59 years of age, 20% [2].

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Pashos, C L, Botteman, M F, Laskin, B L, Redaelli, A. Bladder cancer: epidemiology, diagnosis, and management. Cancer Pract 2002; 10(6): 311–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khadra, M H, Pickard, R S, Charlton, Met al. A prospective analysis of 1,930 patients with hematuria to evaluate current diagnostic practice. J Urol 2000; 163(2): 524–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkali, Z, Chan, T, Manoharan, Met al. Bladder cancer: epidemiology, staging and grading, and diagnosis. Urology 2005; 66(6 suppl. 1): 4–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossfeld, G D, Litwin, M S, Wolf, J S., et al. Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy – part II: patient evaluation, cytology, voided markers, imaging, cystoscopy, nephrology evaluation, and follow-up. Urology 2001; 57(4): 604–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fickenscher, L. Evaluating adult hematuria. Nurse Pract 1999; 24(9): 58–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ambartsumian, A M. The efficacy of rigid and flexible endoscopes in the diagnosis of bladder diseases. Urol Nefrol (Mosk) 1989; 1: 51–3.Google Scholar
Witjes, J A, Moonen, P M, Heijden, A G. Comparison of hexaminolevulinate based flexible and rigid fluorescence cystoscopy with rigid white light cystoscopy in bladder cancer: results of a prospective Phase II study. Eur Urol 2005; 47(3): 319–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badalament, R A, Kimmel, M, Gay, Het al. The sensitivity of flow cytometry compared with conventional cytology in the detection of superficial bladder carcinoma. Cancer 1987; 59(12): 2078–85.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Itzchak, Y, Singer, D, Fischelovitch, Y. Ultrasonographic assessment of bladder tumors. I. Tumor detection. J Urol 1981; 126(1): 31–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitterberger, M, Pinggera, G M, Neuwirt, Het al. Three-dimensional ultrasonography of the urinary bladder: preliminary experience of assessment in patients with haematuria. BJU Int 2007; 99(1): 111–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hain, S F. Positron emission tomography in uro-oncology. Cancer Imaging 2005; 5(1): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, J K, Park, S Y, Ahn, H Jet al. Bladder cancer: analysis of multi-detector row helical CT enhancement pattern and accuracy in tumor detection and perivesical staging. Radiology 2004; 231(3): 725–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caoili, E M, Cohan, R H, Inampudi, Pet al. MDCT urography of upper tract urothelial neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184(6): 1873–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caoili, E M, Inampudi, P, Cohan, R H, Ellis, J. Optimization of multi-detector row CT urography: effect of compression, saline administration, and prolongation of acquisition delay. Radiology 2005; 235(1): 116–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, B, Semelka, R C, Ascher, S Met al. Bladder tumor staging: comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging, dynamic gadolinium-enhanced imaging, and late gadolinium-enhanced imaging. Radiology 1994; 193(1): 239–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neuerburg, J M, Bohndorf, K, Sohn, Met al. Staging of urinary bladder neoplasms with MR imaging: is Gd-DTPA helpful?J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15(5): 780–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nolte-Ernsting, C C, Adam, G B, Gunther, R W. MR urography: examination techniques and clinical applications. Eur Radiol 2001; 11(3): 355–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothpearl, A, Frager, D, Subramanian, Aet al. MR urography: technique and application. Radiology 1995; 194(1): 125–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nolte-Ernsting, C C, Bucker, A, Adam, G Bet al. Gadolinium-enhanced excretory MR urography after low-dose diuretic injection: comparison with conventional excretory urography. Radiology 1998; 209(1): 147–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kishore, T A, George, G K, Bhat, S. Virtual cystoscopy by intravesical instillation of dilute contrast medium: preliminary experience. J Urol 2006; 175(3 Pt 1): 870–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kawai, N, Mimura, T, Nagata, Det al. Intravenous urography-virtual cystoscopy is a better preliminary examination than air virtual cystoscopy. BJU Int 2004; 94(6): 832–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arslan, H, Ceylan, K, Harman, Met al. Virtual computed tomography cystoscopy in bladder pathologies. Int Braz J Urol 2006; 32(2): 147–54; discussion 154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nambirajan, T, Sohaib, S A, Muller-Pollard, Cet al. Virtual cystoscopy from computed tomography: a pilot study. BJU Int 2004; 94(6): 828–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, J K, Ahn, J H, Park, Tet al. Virtual cystoscopy of the contrast material-filled bladder in patients with gross hematuria. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179(3): 763–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, J K, Park, S Y, Kim, H Set al. Comparison of virtual cystoscopy, multiplanar reformation, and source CT images with contrast material-filled bladder for detecting lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185(3): 689–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schreyer, A G, Fielding, J R, Warfield, S Ket al. Virtual CT cystoscopy: color mapping of bladder wall thickness. Invest Radiol 2000; 35(5): 331–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fielding, J R, Hoyte, L X, Okon, S Aet al. Tumor detection by virtual cystoscopy with color mapping of bladder wall thickness. J Urol 2002; 167(2 Pt 1): 559–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beer, A, Saar, B, Rummeny, E J. Tumors of the urinary bladder: technique, current use, and perspectives of MR and CT cystography. Abdom Imaging 2003; 28(6): 868–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lammle, M, Beer, A, Settles, Met al. Reliability of MR imaging-based virtual cystoscopy in the diagnosis of cancer of the urinary bladder. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178(6): 1483–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong-You-Cheong, J J, Woodward, P J, Manning, M Aet al. From the archives of the AFIP: neoplasms of the urinary bladder: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2006; 26(2): 553–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montironi, R, Lopez-Beltran, A. The 2004 WHO classification of bladder tumors: a summary and commentary. Int J Surg Pathol 2005; 13(2): 143–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shokeir, A A. Squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder: pathology, diagnosis and treatment. BJU Int 2004; 93(2): 216–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thali-Schwab, C M, Woodward, P J, Wagner, B J. Computed tomographic appearance of urachal adenocarcinomas: review of 25 cases. Eur Radiol 2005; 15(1): 79–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, M J, Fisher, C, Sohaib, S A. Imaging features of primary nonurachal adenocarcinoma of the bladder. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183(5): 1397–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, A W, Norton, A J, Baithun, S I. Malignant lymphoma of the urinary bladder: a clinicopathological study of 11 cases. J Clin Pathol 2000; 53(6): 458–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sahdev, A, Sohaib, A, Monson, J Pet al. CT and MR imaging of unusual locations of extra-adrenal paragangliomas (pheochromocytomas). Eur Radiol 2005; 15(1): 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umaria, N, Olliff, J F. MRI appearances of bladder endometriosis. Br J Radiol 2000 July; 73(871): 733–6. PMID: 11089464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×