Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T03:48:58.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Food needs of adult parasitoids: behavioral adaptations and consequences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2009

D. M. Olson
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Service US Department of Agriculture USA
K. Takasu
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University Japan
W. J. Lewis
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Service US Department of Agriculture USA
F. L. Wäckers
Affiliation:
Netherlands Institute of Ecology
P. C. J. van Rijn
Affiliation:
Netherlands Institute of Ecology
J. Bruin
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

The importance of adult food for parasitoids

The importance of adult food for parasitoids has been recognized for decades. Numerous laboratory studies show that suitable food sources can substantially increase longevity and fecundity of adult hymenopteran and dipteran parasitoids (reviews: Heimpel et al. 1997; Lewis et al. 1998). It is now appreciated that the consumption of non-host food can influence many other aspects of parasitoid biology such as egg viability, diapause in progeny, foraging decisions, searching efficiency, the onset and rate of egg resorption, primary sex ratio of progeny, flight initiation, and timing of flight. As a consequence non-host food can affect parasitoid and host dynamics, competitive interactions and niche partitioning among parasitoid species, productivity in laboratory cultures, and the probability of parasitoid establishment in classical biological control (Jervis 1998). In those parasitoid species that resorb eggs, starved individuals generally have higher rates of egg resorption than well-fed individuals, but this is not always the case (Olson et al. 2000). Egg resorption may increase life expectancy at the cost of reduced or delayed reproduction, which in turn may increase the risk of predation or other mortality factors. Conversely, there is presumably a metabolic cost to increased egg maturation, which decreases life expectancy (e.g., Roitberg 1989). For species that do not resorb eggs (Olson et al. 2000), investing in reproduction rather than increased life expectancy may be a viable reproductive strategy, especially in host-rich habitats. In host-poor habitats, however, non-host food will be important to extend life expectancy.

Type
Chapter
Information
Plant-Provided Food for Carnivorous Insects
A Protective Mutualism and its Applications
, pp. 137 - 147
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beach, J. P., Williams, L., Hendrix, D. L., and Price, L. D.. 2003. Different food sources affect the gustatory response of Anaphes iole, an egg parasitoid of Lygus spp. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29: 1203–1222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browne, L. B. 1993. Physiologically induced changes in resource-oriented behavior. Annual Review of Entomology 38: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugg, R. L. and Ellis, R. T.. 1990. Insects associated with cover crops in Massachusetts. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 7: 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, M. and Loon, J. J. A.. 2000. Multitrophic effects of herbivore-induced plant volatiles in an evolutionary context. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 97: 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, L. E. and Landis, D. A.. 1996. Effects of habitat, temperature, and sugar availability on longevity of Eriborus terebrans (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Environmental Entomology 25: 1192–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, C., Torres, B. B., and Terra, W. R.. 1998. Substrate specification of midgut beta-glycosidases from insects of different orders. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B 119: 219–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harborne, J. B. 1993. Introduction to Ecological and Biochemistry, 4th edn. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heimpel, G. E. and Rosenheim, J. A.. 1995. Dynamic host feeding in the parasitoid Aphytis melinus: the balance between current and future reproduction. Journal of Animal Ecology 64: 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heimpel, G. E., Rosenheim, J. A., and Kattari, D.. 1997. Adult feeding and lifetime reproductive success in the parasitoid Aphytis melinus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 83: 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iizuka, T. and Takasu, K.. 1999. Balancing between host- and food-foraging by the host-feeding pupal parasitoid Pimpla luctuosa Smish (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Entomological Science 2: 67–73.Google Scholar
Jervis, M. A. 1998. Functional and evolutionary aspects of mouthpart structure in parasitoid wasps. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 63: 461–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, M. A. and Kidd, N. A. C.. 1995. Incorporating physiological realism into models of parasitoid feeding behaviour. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 434–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jervis, M. A. and N. A. C. Kidd. 1996. Phytophagy. In Jervis, M. A. and Kidd, N. A. C. (eds.) Insect Natural Enemies: Practical Approaches to their Study and Evaluation. London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 375–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, M. A., Heimpel, G. E., Ferns, P. N., Harvey, J. A., and Kidd, N. A. C.. 2001. Life-history strategies in parasitoid wasps: a comparative analysis of ‘ovigeny’. Journal of Animal Ecology 70(3): 442–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, M. A., Kidd, N. A. C., and Almey, H. E.. 1994. Post-reproductive life in the parasitoid Bracon hebetor (Say) (Hym., Braconidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 117: 72–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, M. A., Kidd, N. A. C., Fitton, M. G., Huddleston, T., and Dawah, H. A.. 1993. Flower visiting by hymenopteran parasitoids. Journal of Natural History 27: 67–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, W. J. and Takasu, K.. 1990. Use of learned odours by a parasitic wasp in accordance with host and food needs. Nature 348: 635–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, W. J., Stapel, J. O., Cortesero, A. M., and Takasu, K.. 1998. Understanding how parasitoids balance food and host needs: importance to biological control. Biological Control 11: 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, W. J., Vet, L. E. M., Tumlinson, J. H., Lenteren, J. C., and Papaj, D. R.. 1990. Variations in parasitoid foraging behavior: essential element of a sound biological control theory. Environmental Entomology 19: 1183–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughrin, J. H., Manukian, A., Heath, R. R., and Tumlinson, J. H.. 1995. Volatiles emitted by different cotton varieties damaged by feeding beet armyworm larvae. Journal of Chemical Ecology 21: 1217–1227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayse, M. A. and Price, P. W.. 1978. Seasonal development of soybean arthropod communities in east central Illinois. Agro-ecosystems (Amsterdam) 4: 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. M., Fadamiro, H., Lundgren, J. G., and Heimpel, G. E., 2000. Effects of sugar feeding on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in a parasitoid wasp. Physiological Entomology 25: 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. M., Hodges, T. and Lewis, W. J. 2003a. Foraging efficacy of a larval parasitoid in a cotton patch: influence of chemical cues and learning. Journal of Insect Behavior 16: 613–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. M., S. C. Phatak, and W. J. Lewis. 1999. Influence of nitrogen levels on cotton plant/insect interactions in a conservation tillage system. Proc. 22nd Annual Southern Conservation Tillage Conference for Sustainable Agriculture, Tifton, GA, pp. 119–130.
Olson, D. M., Rains, G. C., Meiners, T., et al. 2003b. Parasitic wasps learn and report diverse chemicals with unique conditionable behaviors. Chemical Senses 28: 545–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otten, H., Wäckers, F. L., and Dorn, S.. 2001. Efficacy of vibrational sounding in the parasitoid Pimpla turionellae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) is affected by female size. Animal Behaviour 61: 671–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patt, J. M., Hamilton, G. C., and Lashomb, J. H.. 1997. Foraging success of parasitoid wasps on flowers: interplay of insect morphology, floral architecture and searching behavior. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 83: 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellet, F. C. 1976. American Honey Plants. Hamilton, IL: Dadant and Sons.Google Scholar
Price, P. W., Bouton, C. E., Gross, P., et al. 1980. Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quicke, D. L. J. 1997. Parasitic Wasps. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Roitberg, B. D. 1989. The cost of reproduction in rosehip flies, Rhagoletis basiola: eggs are time. Evolutionary Ecology 3: 156–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, M. and Takasu, K.. 2000. Food odor learning by both sexes of the pupal parasitoid Pimpla alboannulatus Uchida (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 13: 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapel, J. O., Cortesero, A. M., Moraes, C. M., Tumlinson, J. H., and Lewis, W. J.. 1997. Extrafloral nectar, honeydew, and sucrose effects on searching behavior and efficiency of Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in cotton. Environmental Entomology 26: 617–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takasu, K. and Hirose, Y.. 1991. Host searching behavior in the parasitoid Ooencyrtus nezarae (Hymenoptera: Encrytidae) as influenced by non-host food deprivation. Applied Entomology and Zoology 26: 415–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takasu, K. and Lewis, W. J.. 1993. Host- and food-foraging of the parasitoid Microplitis croceipes: learning and physiological state effects. Biological Control 3: 70–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takasu, K. and Lewis, W. J.. 1995. Importance of adult food source to host searching of the larval parasitoid Microplitis croceipes. Biological Control 5: 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takasu, K. and Lewis, W. J.. 1996. The role of learning in adult food location by the larval parasitoid, Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 9: 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tertuliano, M., Olson, D. M., Rains, G. C., and Lewis, W. J.. 2004. Influence of handling and conditioning protocol on learning and memory of Microplitis croceipes. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 110: 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, J. S. 1999. Jasmonate-inducible plant defences cause increased parasitism of herbivores. Nature 399: 686–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turlings, T. C. J. and F. L. Wäckers. 2004. Recruitment of predators and parasitoids by herbivore-injured plants. In Cardé, R. T. and Millar, J. (eds.) Advances in Chemical Ecology of Insects. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handel, E. 1985a. Rapid determination of glycogen and sugars in mosquitoes. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 1: 299–301.Google Scholar
Handel, E. 1985b. Rapid determination of total lipids in mosquitoes. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 1: 302–304.Google Scholar
Vet, L. E. M., L. Hemerik, M. E. Visser, and F. L. Wäckers. 2002. Flexibility in host search and patch use strategies of insect parasitoids. In Lewis, E. E., Cambell, J. F., and Sukhdeo, M. V. K. (eds.) The Behavioural Ecology of Parasites. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, pp. 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wäckers, F. L. 1994. The effect of food deprivation on the innate visual and olfactory preferences in the parasitoid Cotesia rubecula. Journal of Insect Physiology 40: 641–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wäckers, F. L. 1999. Gustatory response by the hymenopteran parasitoid Cotesia glomerata to a range of nectar and honeydew sugars. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25: 2863–2877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wäckers, F. L. 2001. A comparison of nectar- and honeydew sugars with respect to their utilization by the hymenopteran parasitoid Cotesia glomerata. Journal of Insect Physiology 47: 1077–1084.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wäckers, F. L. and Lewis, W. J.. 1994. Olfactory and visual learning and their combined influence on host site location by the parasitoid Microplitis croceipes (Cresson). Biological Control 4: 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wäckers, F. L. and Steppuhn, A.. 2003. Characterizing nutritional state and food source use of parasitoids collected in fields with high and low nectar availability. IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 26: 203–208.Google Scholar
Wäckers, F. L. and Swaans, C. P. M.. 1993. Finding floral nectar and honeydew in Cotesia rubecula: random or directed? Proceedings of the Section Experimental and Applied Entomology of the Netherlands Entomological Society 4: 67–72.Google Scholar
Wäckers, F. L., Bonifay, C., and Lewis, W. J.. 2002. Conditioning of appetitive behavior in the hymenopteran parasitoid Microplitis croceipes. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 103: 135–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wäckers, F. L., Zuber, D., Wunderlin, R., and Keller, F.. 2001. The effect of herbivory on temporal and spatial dynamics of foliar nectar production in cotton and castor. Annals of Botany 87: 365–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×