Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T23:06:12.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Food for protection: an introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2009

Felix L. Wäckers
Affiliation:
Centre for Terrestrial Ecology Netherlands Institute of Ecology The Netherlands
Paul C. J. van Rijn
Affiliation:
Netherlands Institute of Ecology The Netherlands
F. L. Wäckers
Affiliation:
Netherlands Institute of Ecology
P. C. J. van Rijn
Affiliation:
Netherlands Institute of Ecology
J. Bruin
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

It has long been recognized that plants provide floral nectar and pollen to attract pollinators. In addition, plants also provide specific foods as part of a protection strategy. By producing extrafloral nectar or food bodies, plants attract predators that can act as bodyguards, clearing the plant of its antagonists. A wide range of arthropods with a primarily carnivorous lifestyle require plant-provided food as an indispensable part of their diet (Table 1.1). In some arthropod groups, the adult stages depend on nectar or pollen for survival and reproduction, whereas in other groups all stages feed on plant-provided food in addition to prey. Only recently have we started to appreciate the implications of non-prey food for plant-herbivore-carnivore interactions. Insight into these food-mediated interactions not only helps in understanding the functioning of multitrophic interactions in natural ecosystems, it also has direct implications for the use of food supplements in biological control programs. In this introductory chapter we first sketch a historical perspective on the topic of plant-provided foods. Subsequently, we present an outline of the book and briefly introduce the different chapters.

The scientific discovery of plant-provided foods

Humans have always shared the sweet tooth of many arthropods. However, for long we lacked the ability to obtain sugars directly from plants, and thus were entirely dependent on insects as intermediaries. Therefore, it is not surprising that nectar and honeydew in connection with insects attracted the attention of naturalists early on.

Type
Chapter
Information
Plant-Provided Food for Carnivorous Insects
A Protective Mutualism and its Applications
, pp. 1 - 14
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, C. L. and Selander, R. B.. 1979. The biology of blister beetles of the Vittata Group of the genus Epicauta (Coleoptera, Meloidae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 162: 139–266.Google Scholar
Adjei-Maafo, I. K. and Wilson, L. T.. 1983. Factors affecting the relative abundance of arthropods on nectaried and nectariless cotton. Environmental Entomology 12: 349–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altieri, M. A. and Whitcomb, W. H.. 1979. The potential use of weeds in manipulation of beneficial insects. Horticulture Science 14: 12–18.Google Scholar
Beattie, A. J. 1985. The Evolutionary Ecology of Ant-Plant Mutualisms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belt, T. 1874. The Naturalist in Nicaragua. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Bentley, B. L. 1977. Extrafloral nectaries and protection by pugnacious bodyguards. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 8: 407–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenheimer, F. S. 1947. The manna of Sinai. Biblical Archeologist 10: 2–6.Google Scholar
Bugg, R. L. and Waddington, C.. 1994. Using cover crops to manage arthropod pests of orchards: a review. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 50: 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, O. F. 1905. The social organization and breeding habits of the cotton-protecting kelep of Guatemala. US Department of Agriculture Technical Series 10: 1–55.Google Scholar
Cottrell, T. E. and Yeargan, K. V.. 1998. Effect of pollen on Coleomegilla maculata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) population density, predation, and cannibalism in sweet corn. Environmental Entomology 27: 1402–1410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuautle, M. and Rico-Gray, V.. 2003. The effect of wasps and ants on the reproductive success of the extrafloral nectaried plant Turnera ulmifolia (Turneraceae). Functional Ecology 17: 417–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. 1855. Nectar-secreting organs of plants. Gardeners' Chronicle 29: 487.Google Scholar
Delpino, F. 1873. Ulteriori osservazioni e considerazioni sulla dichogamia nel regno vegetale. Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali 16: 151–349.Google Scholar
Faegri, K. and Pijl, L.. 1979. The Principles of Pollination Ecology. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, F. and Jervis, M.. 1998. Functional, evolutionary and ecological aspects of feeding-related mouthpart specializations in parasitoid flies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 63: 495–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, D. R. and McGregor, R. R.. 2000. The functions of plant feeding in the omnivorous predator Dicyphus hesperus: water places limits on predation. Ecological Entomology 25: 380–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, H. and Toft, S.. 1997. Variable degrees of granivory and phytophagy in insectivorous carabid beetles. Pedobiologia 41: 521–525.Google Scholar
Hagen, K. S. 1986. Ecosystem analysis: plant cultivars (HPR), entomophagous species and food supplements. In Boethel, D. J. and Eikenbary, R. D. (eds.) Interactions of Plant Resistance and Parasitoids and Predators of Insects. New York: John Wiley, pp. 153–197.Google Scholar
Hall, B. M. 1762. Dissertatio Botanica sistens Nectaria florum. Upsala: Dissertationes Academica (Linné).Google Scholar
Hickman, J. M., Lovei, G. L., and Wratten, S. D.. 1995. Pollen feeding by adults of the hoverfly Melanostoma fasciatum (Diptera: Syrphidae). New Zealand Journal of Zoology 22: 387–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocking, H. 1966. The influence of food on longevity and oviposition in Rhyssa persuasoria (L.) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 6: 83–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illingworth, J. F. 1921. Natural enemies of sugar-cane beetles in Queensland. Queensland Bureau Sugar Experimental Station Division of Entomology Bulletin 13: 1–47.Google Scholar
Janzen, D. H. 1966. Coevolution of mutualism between ants and acacias in Central America. Evolution 20: 249–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jervis, M. 1998. Functional and evolutionary aspects of mouthpart structure in parasitoid wasps. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 63: 461–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, W. D. J. 1997. Feeding. In Lewis, T. (ed.) Thrips as Crop Pests. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, pp. 217–257.Google Scholar
Landis, D. A., Wratten, S. D., and Gurr, G. M.. 2000. Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology 45: 175–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leche, J. 1765. Auszug aus dem täglichen Verzeichnisse der Witterungen das zu Abo, vom 1750sten bis zu Ende 1761 ist gehalten worden. III. Das Wasser, das aus der Luft herabfällt. Der Königlischen schwedischen Akademie der Wissenschaften neue Abhandlungen aus der Naturlehre, Haushaltungskunst und Mechanik 25: 16–27.Google Scholar
Lewis, W., Stapel, J., Cortesero, A., and Takasu, K.. 1998. Understanding how parasitoids balance food and host needs: importance to biological control. Biological Control 11: 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukefahr, M. J., Martin, D. F., and Meyer, J. R.. 1965. Plant resistance to five Lepidoptera attacking cotton. Journal of Economic Entomology 58: 516–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwen, P. K., Jervis, M. A., and Kidd, N. A. C.. 1993. Influence of artificial honeydew on larval development and survival in Chrysoperla carnea (Neu. Chrysopidae). Entomophaga 38: 241–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGavin, G. C. 2000. Insects, Spiders and other Terrestrial Arthropods. London: Dorling Kindersley.Google Scholar
Mound, L. A. 1962. Extra-floral nectaries of cotton and their secretion. Empire Cotton Growing Review 39: 254–261.Google Scholar
Opit, G., Roitberg, B., and Gillespie, D. R.. 1997. The functional response and prey preference of Feltiella acarisuga (Vallot) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) for two of its prey: male and female twospotted spider mites, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychiidae). Canadian Entomologist 129: 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pemberton, R. W. and Vandenberg, N. J.. 1993. Extrafloral nectar feeding by ladybird beetles (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 95: 139–151.Google Scholar
Polis, G. A. and Strong, D. R.. 1996. Food web complexity and community dynamics. American Naturalist 147: 813–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, C. E. 1985. Extrafloral nectar: entomological implications. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 31: 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruberson, J. R., Tauber, M. J., and Tauber, C. A.. 1986. Plant feeding by Podisus maculiventris (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae): effect on survival, development, and preoviposition period. Environmental Entomology 15: 894–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudgers, J. A. 2002. Evolutionary ecology of ant–wild cotton associations. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Davis, California.
Schneider, F. 1940. Schadinsekten und ihre Bekämpfung in ostindischen Gambirkulturen. Mitteillungen der schweizerischen entomologischen Gesellschaft 18: 77–207.Google Scholar
Schuster, M. F. and M. Calderon. 1986. Interactions of host plant resistant genotypes and beneficial insects on cotton ecosystems. In Boethel, R. D. and Eikenbary, R. D. (eds.) Interactions of Plant Resistance and Parasitoids and Predators of Insects. New York: John Wiley, pp. 84–97.Google Scholar
Smith, R. B. and Mommsen, T. P.. 1984. Pollen feeding in an orb-weaving spider. Science 226: 1330–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprengel, C. K. 1793. Das entdeckte Geheimnis der Natur im Bau und der Befruchtung der Blumen. Berlin: Vieweg. (Reprinted 1972.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stelzl, M. 1991. Investigations on food of Neuroptera adults (Neuropteroidea, Insecta) in Central Europe, with a short discussion of their role as natural enemies of insect pests. Journal of Applied Entomology / Zeitschrift für angewandte Entomologie 111: 469–477.Google Scholar
Traugott, M. 2003. The prey spectrum of larval and adult Cantharis species in arable land: an electrophoretic approach. Pedobiologia 47: 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trelease, W. 1879. Nectar, what it is and some of its uses. US Department of Agriculture Report on Cotton Insects 3: 319–343.Google Scholar
Turlings, T. C. J. and F. L. Wäckers. 2004. Recruitment of predators and parasitoids by herbivore-injured plants. In Cardé, R. T. and Millar, J. (eds.) Advances in Insect Chemical Ecology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emden, H. F. 1965. The role of uncultivated land in the biology of crop pests and beneficial insects. Scientific Horticulture 17: 121–136.Google Scholar
Rijn, P. C. J. and Tanigoshi, L. K.. 1999a. The contribution of extrafloral nectar to survival and reproduction of the predatory mite Iphiseius degenerans on Ricinus communis. Experimental and Applied Acarology 23: 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijn, P. C. J. and Tanigoshi, L. K.. 1999b. Pollen as food for the predatory mites Iphiseius degenerans and Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae): dietary range and life history. Experimental and Applied Acarology 23: 785–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wettstein, R. 1889. Über die compositen der Oesterreichisch-Ungarischen Flora mit zuckerabscheidenden Hüllschuppen. Oesterreiche Akademie der Wissenschaften, Sitzungsberichte Teil I, Minerologie, Krystallographie, Botanik 97: 570–589.Google Scholar
Wäckers, F. L. 2001. A comparison of nectar and honeydew sugars with respect to their utilization by the hymenopteran parasitoid Cotesia glomerata. Journal of Insect Physiology 47: 1077–1084.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolcott, G. N. 1942. The requirements of parasites for more than hosts. Science 96: 317–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zerm, M. and Adis, J.. 2001. Spatio-temporal distribution of larval and adult tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) from open areas in Central Amazonian floodplains (Brazil). Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 36: 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×