Bibliography

Andrew Franta

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511484209.009

Abrams, M. H.The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Abrams, M. H.Natural Supernaturalism: Tradition and Revolution in Romantic Literature. New York: Norton, 1971.Google Scholar

Abrams, M. H.“Two Roads to Wordsworth.” 1972. Rpt. in The Correspondent Breeze: Essays on English Romanticism. New York: Norton, 1984. 145–57.Google Scholar

Abrams, M. H. ed. English Romantic Poets: Modern Essays in Criticism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Dante, Alighieri. Il Convito: The Banquet of Dante Alighieri. Trans. Elizabeth Price Sayer. New York: G. Routledge and Sons, 1887.Google Scholar

Altick, Richard D.The English Common Reader: A Social History of the Mass Reading Public, 1800–1900. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Altieri, Charles. “Wordsworth's Poetics of Eloquence: A Challenge to Contemporary Theory.” In Romantic Revolutions: Criticism and Theory. Eds. Johnston, Kenneth R. et al. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1990. 371–407.Google Scholar

Arac, Jonathan. Critical Genealogies: Historical Situations for Postmodern Literary Studies. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Armstrong, Isobel. Victorian Poetry: Poetry, Poetics and Politics. 1993. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar

Armstrong, Nancy. Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L.How To Do Things With Words. 1962. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975.CrossRef Google Scholar

Babbitt, Irving. Rousseau and Romanticism. 1919. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Baker, Carlos. Shelley's Major Poetry: The Fabric of a Vision. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1948.Google Scholar

Baker, J. H.An Introduction to English Legal History. 2nd ed. London: Butterworths, 1979.Google Scholar

Barcus, James E., ed. Shelley: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1975.Google Scholar

Barker-Benfield, G. J.The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Barney, Darin. Prometheus Wired: The Hope for Democracy in the Age of Network Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Barrell, John. The Birth of Pandora and the Division of Knowledge. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Barrell, JohnImagining the King's Death: Figurative Treason, Fantasies of Regicide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Barrell, John“Divided We Grow.” London Review of Books (5 June 2003): 811.Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. “The Death of the Author.” In Image, Music, Text. Ed. and trans. Heath, Stephen. New York: Hill and Wang, 1977. 142–48.Google Scholar

Bate, Walter Jackson. John Keats. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Bateson, F. W.Wordsworth: A Re-interpretation. London: Longman, Green, and Co., 1956.Google Scholar

Bayley, John. The Uses of Division: Unity and Disharmony in Literature. London: Chatto & Windus, 1976.Google Scholar

Behrendt, Stephen C.Shelley and His Audiences. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Behrendt, Stephen C. ed. Romanticism, Radicalism, and the Press. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter. “The Task of the Translator.” In Illuminations. Trans. Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken Books, 1969. 69–82.Google Scholar

Bennett, Andrew. Keats, Narrative and Audience: The Posthumous Life of Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Bennett, Andrew“Shelley in Posterity.” In Shelley: Poet and Legislator of the World. Ed. Bennett, Betty T. and Curran, Stuart. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996. 215–23.Google Scholar

Bennett, AndrewRomantic Poets and the Culture of Posterity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bennett, Andrew“On Posterity.” Yale Journal of Criticism 12:1 (1999): 131–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy. A Fragment on Government. Ed. Harrison, Ross. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Bentham, JeremyThe Works of Jeremy Bentham. Ed. Bowring, John. Vol. 2. Edinburgh, 1843.Google Scholar

Bialostosky, Don H.Wordsworth, Dialogics, and the Practice of Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Blackstone, William. Commentaries on the Laws of England. With notes and additions by Christian, Edward. 15th ed. Vol. 4. London, 1809.Google Scholar

Blake, William. The Marriage of Heaven and Hell. In Blake's Poetry and Designs. Ed. Johnson, Mary Lynn and Grant, John E.. New York: Norton, 1979.Google Scholar

Bloom, Harold, ed. Romanticism and Consciousness. New York: Norton, 1970.Google Scholar

Bobbio, Norberto. Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction. Trans. Allan Cameron. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Boswell, James. Life of Johnson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

James, Boyle D. A. “The Search for an Author: Shakespeare and the Framers.” American University Law Review 37:3 (1988): 625–43.Google Scholar

Bradley, A. C. “The Reaction Against Tennyson.” In Tennyson's Poetry. 585–92.

Brantlinger, Patrick. The Reading Lesson: The Threat of Mass Literacy in Nineteenth-Century British Fiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Brewer, John. Party Ideology and Popular Politics at the Accession of George III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brisman, Susan Hawk. “‘Unsaying His High Language’: The Problem of Voice in Prometheus Unbound.” Studies in Romanticism 16 (1977): 51–86.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bronson, Bertrand Harris. “Strange Relations: The Author and His Audience.” In Facets of Enlightenment: Studies of English Literature and Its Contexts. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968. 298–325.Google Scholar

Buckley, Jerome. The Victorian Temper. New York: Vintage, 1964.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. Reflections on the Revolution in France. Ed. Conor Cruise O'Brien. 1790. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1968.Google Scholar

Burke, EdmundThe Works and Correspondence of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. 8 vols. London, 1852.Google Scholar

Burke, EdmundBurke's Politics: Selected Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke on Reform, Revolution, and War. Ed. Ross J. S. Hoffman and Paul Levack. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1949.Google Scholar

Burke, Kenneth. A Rhetoric of Motives. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1950.Google Scholar

Bush, Douglas. “Tennyson.” In Tennyson's Poetry. 599–602.

Butler, Marilyn. “Shelley and the Empire in the East.” In Shelley: Poet and Legislator of the World. Ed. Betty T. Bennett and Stuart Curran. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996. 158–68.

Butler, Marilyned. Burke, Paine, Godwin, and the Revolution Controversy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Byron, George Gordon, Lord. Byron. The Oxford Authors. Ed. McGann, Jerome J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Byron, George Gordon, LordThe Complete Miscellaneous Prose. Ed. Nicholson, Andrew. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Calhoun, Craig, ed. Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Cameron, Kenneth Neill. Shelley: The Golden Years. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cannon, John. Parliamentary Reform, 1640–1832. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Canuel, Mark. Religion, Toleration, and British Writing, 1790–1830. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chandler, James K.Wordsworth's Second Nature: A Study of the Poetry and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Chandler, James K.“The Pope Controversy: Romantic Poetics and the English Canon.” In Canons. Ed. Hallberg, Robert. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984. 197–225.Google Scholar

Chandler, James K.“Poetical Liberties: Burke's France and the ‘Adequate Representation’ of the English.” In The French Revolution and the Creation of Modern Political Culture. Ed. Furet, François and Ozouf, Mona. Vol. 3. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1989. 45–58.Google Scholar

Chandler, James K.“Hallam, Tennyson, and the Poetry of Sensation: Aestheticist Allegories of a Counter-Public Sphere.” Studies in Romanticism 33:4 (1994): 527–37.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chandler, James K.England in 1819: The Politics of Literary Culture and the Case of Romantic Historicism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Riverside Chaucer. Ed. Benson, Larry D.. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987.Google Scholar

Chilcott, Tim. A Publisher and His Circle: The Life and Work of John Taylor, Keats's Publisher. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972.Google Scholar

Christensen, Jerome. “Once an Apostate Always an Apostate.” Studies in Romanticism 21:3 (1983): 461–64.CrossRef Google Scholar

Christensen, JeromeLord Byron's Strength: Romantic Writing and Commercial Society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Biographia Literaria. Ed. Engell, James and Bate, W. Jackson. 2 vols. In The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Vol. 7. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel TaylorCollected Letters of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Ed. Griggs, Earl Leslie. 6 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956–71.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel TaylorThe Friend. Ed. Rooke, Barbara E.. 2 vols. In The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Vol. 4. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969.Google Scholar

Coleridge, Samuel TaylorThe Complete Poetical Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Ed. Coleridge, Ernest Hartley. Vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1912.Google Scholar

Collins, A. S.The Profession of Letters: A Study of the Relation of Author to Patron, Publisher, and Public, 1780–1832. London: Routledge, 1928.Google Scholar

Cooper, Andrew. Doubt and Identity in Romantic Poetry. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Cowden Clarke, Charles and Mary, . Recollections of Writers. London, 1878.Google Scholar

Cox, Jeffrey N.Poetry and Politics in the Cockney School: Keats, Shelley, Hunt and their Circle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Crisman, William. “A Dramatic Voice in Keats's Elgin Marbles Sonnet.” Studies in Romanticism 26:1 (1987): 49–58.CrossRef Google Scholar

Curran, Stuart. “Adonais in Context.” In Shelley Revalued: Essays from the Gregynog Conference. Ed. Everest, Kelvin. Totowa: Barnes & Noble, 1983. 165–82.Google Scholar

Curran, StuartPoetic Form and British Romanticism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Dawson, P. M. S.The Unacknowledged Legislator: Shelley and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Man, Paul. Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Man, PaulThe Rhetoric of Romanticism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Denecke, Daniel. “The Motivation of Tennyson's Reader: Privacy and the Politics of Literary Ambiguity in The Princess.” Victorian Studies 43:2 (2001): 201–27.CrossRef Google Scholar

Quincey, Thomas. “The English Mail-Coach, or the Glory of Motion.” In Confessions of an English Opium-Eater and Other Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. 183–233.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. Specters of Marx: The State of Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. Trans. Peggy Kamuf. New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar

Dyer, Gary. “Thieves, Boxers, Sodomites, Poets: Being Flash to Byron's Don Juan.” PMLA 116:3 (2001): 562–78.Google Scholar

Edwards, Thomas R.Imagination and Power: A Study of Poetry on Public Themes. New York: Oxford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Eilenberg, Susan. Strange Power of Speech: Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Literary Possession. New York: Oxford, 1992.Google Scholar

Eley, Geoff. “Nations, Publics, and Political Cultures: Placing Habermas in the Nineteenth Century.” In Calhoun, ed. Habermas and the Public Sphere. 289–339.

Eliot, T. S.The Use of Poetry and the Use of Criticism. 1933. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Eliot, T. S.“The Metaphysical Poets.” 1921. In Selected Prose of T. S. Eliot. Ed. Kermode, Frank. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1975. 59–67.Google Scholar

Erickson, Lee. The Economy of Literary Form: English Literature and the Industrialization of Publishing. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Feldman, Paula R. “Endurance and Forgetting: What the Evidence Suggests.” In Linkin and Behrendt, eds. Romanticism and Women Poets. 16–21.

Ferguson, Frances. Wordsworth: Language as Counter-Spirit. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Ferguson, FrancesSolitude and the Sublime: Romanticism and the Aesthetics of Individuation. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

Finch, Casey and Bowen, Peter. “‘The Tittle-Tattle of Highbury’: Gossip and the Free Indirect Style in Emma.” Representations 31 (1990): 1–18.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fish, Stanley. “Authors-Readers: Jonson's Community of the Same.” Representations 7 (1984): 26–58.CrossRef Google Scholar

Foot, Paul. Red Shelley. London: Sidgwick and Jackson, 1980.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. “What Is an Author?” Trans. Josué V. Harari. In Textual Strategies: Perspective in Post-Structuralist Criticism. Ed. Harari, Josué V.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1979. 141–160.Google Scholar

Fraistat, Neil. “Illegitimate Shelley: Radical Piracy and the Textual Edition as Cultural Performance.” PMLA 109:3 (1994): 409–23.CrossRef Google Scholar

Furniss, Tom. Edmund Burke's Aesthetic Ideology: Language, Gender, and Political Economy in Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gallagher, Catherine. The Industrial Revolution of English Fiction. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Gallagher, CatherineNobody's Story: The Vanishing Acts of Women Writers in the Marketplace, 1670–1820. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Gamer, Michael. Romanticism and the Gothic: Genre, Reception, and Canon Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gilbert, Sandra and Gubar, Susan. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Gilmartin, Kevin. Print Politics: The Press and Radical Opposition in Early Nineteenth-Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Gilmartin, Kevin“Burke, Popular Opinion, and the Problem of a Counter-Revolutionary Public Sphere.” In Edmund Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France: New Interdisciplinary Essays. Ed. Whale, John. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000. 94–114.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Steven. Unbuilding Jerusalem: Apocalypse and Romantic Representation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Griffin, Robert J.Wordsworth's Pope: A Study in Literary Historiography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Grimes, Kyle. “Queen Mab, the Law of Libel, and the Forms of Shelley's Politics.” Journal of English and German Philology 94:5 (1995): 1–18.Google Scholar

Gunn, J. A. W.Beyond Liberty and Property. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Thomas Burger, with the assistance of Frederick Lawrence. 1962. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen“The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article.” 1964. Trans. Sara Lennox and Frank Lennox. New German Critique 3 (1974): 49–55.Google Scholar

Halévy, Elie. The Growth of Philosophical Radicalism. Trans. Mary Morris. Preface by A. D. Lindsay. 1928. London: Faber & Faber, 1949.Google Scholar

Haley, Bruce. Living Forms: Romantics and the Monumental Figure. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Hallam, Arthur Henry. “On Some of the Characteristics of Modern Poetry, and on the Lyrical Poems of Alfred Tennyson.” In Victorian Poetry and Poetics. Ed. Houghton, Walter E. and Stange, G. Robert. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1968. 848–60.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Paul. Metaromanticism: Aesthetics, Literature, Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Haydon, Benjamin Robert. The Autobiography and Memoirs of Benjamin Robert Haydon. Ed. Taylor, Tom. 2 vols. London: Peter Davies, 1926.Google Scholar

Haydon, Benjamin RobertThe Diary of Benjamin Robert Haydon. Ed. Pope, W. B.. 5 vols. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960–63.

Hazlitt, William. The Complete Works of William Hazlitt. Ed. Howe, P. P.. 21 vols. London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1930–34.Google Scholar

Heringman, Noah. “Stones so wonderous Cheap.” Studies in Romanticism 37:1 (1998): 43–63.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hill, Robert W., Jr. “In Defense of Reading Tennyson.” In Tennyson's Poetry. 607–12.

Hofkosh, Sonia. Sexual Politics and the Romantic Author. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Hogle, Jerrold. Shelley's Process: Radical Transference and the Development of His Major Works. New York: Oxford, 1988.Google Scholar

Holdsworth, William. A History of English Law. 2nd ed. 16 vols. 1925. London: Methuen, 1966.Google Scholar

Holmes, Richard. Shelley: The Pursuit. 1974. New York: E. P. Dutton, 1975.Google Scholar

Holt, Francis Ludlow. The Law of Libel. London, 1812.Google Scholar

Homans, Margaret. “Keats Reading Women, Women Reading Keats.” Studies in Romanticism 29:3 (1990): 341–70.CrossRef Google Scholar

Howell, T. B. and Jones Howell, Thomas, eds. A Complete Collection of State Trials. 30 vols. London, 1816–22.

Hughes, Daniel. “Prometheus Made Capable Poet in Act One of Prometheus Unbound.” Studies in Romanticism 17 (1978): 3–11.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hunt, Leigh. Lord Byron and Some of His Contemporaries. London, 1828.Google Scholar

Jack, Ian. Keats and the Mirror of Art. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Carol. Uncontainable Romanticism: Shelley, Bronte, Kleist. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Jacobus, Mary. Tradition and Experiment in Wordsworth's Lyrical Ballads (1798). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Janowitz, Anne. “‘A Voice from across the Sea’: Communitarianism at the Limits of Romanticism.” In At the Limits of Romanticism: Essays in Cultural, Feminist, and Materialist Criticism. Ed. Favret, Mary A and Watson, Nicola J.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994. 83–100.Google Scholar

Janowitz, AnneLyric and Labour in the Romantic Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Jeffrey, Francis. “The State of Parties.” Edinburgh Review 15 (1810): 504–21.Google Scholar

Jeffrey, Francis “Review of Records of Woman (2nd ed.) and The Forest Sanctuary (2nd ed.), By Hemans.” In Wolfson, ed. Felicia Hemans. 549–56.

Johnston, Kenneth. Wordsworth andThe Recluse. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Jump, John D., ed. Tennyson: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967.Google Scholar

Kaufman, Robert. “Legislators of the Post-Everything World: Shelley's Defence of Adorno.” ELH 63:3 (1996): 707–33.CrossRef Google Scholar

Keach, William. “Radical Shelley?” Raritan 5:2 (1985): 120–29.Google Scholar

Keach, William“Shelley and the Revolutionary Left.” In Evaluating Shelley. Ed. Clark, Timothy and Hogle, Jerrold E.. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1996. 75–90.Google Scholar

Keats, John. The Poems of Johns Keats. Ed. Stillinger, Jack. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Keats, JohnThe Letters of John Keats, 1814–1821. Ed. Rollins, Edward Hyder. 2 vols. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Keen, Paul. The Crisis of Literature in the 1790s: Print Culture and the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kelley, Theresa. “Keats, Ekphrasis, and History.” In Keats and History. Ed. Roe, Nicholas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. 212–37.Google Scholar

Kernan, Alvin. Printing Technology, Letters, and Samuel Johnson. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Klancher, Jon P.The Making of English Reading Audiences, 1790–1832. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Knapp, Steven. Literary Interest: The Limits of Anti-Formalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Knapp, Steven and Benn Michaels, Walter. “Against Theory 2: Hermeneutics and Deconstruction.” Critical Inquiry 14:1 (1987): 49–68.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kneale, J. Douglas. Monumental Writing: Aspects of Rhetoric in Wordsworth's Poetry.Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Kohler, Michael. “Shelley in Chancery: The Reimagination of the Paternalist State in The Cenci.” Studies in Romanticism 37:4 (1998): 545–89.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kramnick, Isaac. The Rage of Edmund Burke: Portrait of an Ambivalent Conservative. New York: Basic Books, 1977.Google Scholar

Kramnick, Jonathan Brody. “The Making of the English Canon.” PMLA 112:5 (1997): 1087–1101.CrossRef Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Trans. Winston Moore and Paul Cammack. London: Verso, 1985.Google Scholar

Leavis, F. R. “Shelley.” In Abrams, ed. English Romantic Poets. 345–65.

Levinson, Marjorie. Keats's Life of Allegory: The Origins of a Style. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar

Levinson, MarjorieWordsworth's Great Period Poems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Lewis, C. S. “Shelley, Dryden, and Mr. Eliot.” In Abrams, ed. English Romantic Poets. 324–44.

Linkin, Harriet Kramer and Behrendt, Stephen C., eds. Romanticism and Women Poets: Opening the Doors of Reception. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1999.Google Scholar

Lipking, Lawrence. The Life of the Poet: Beginning and Ending Poetic Careers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Liu, Alan. Wordsworth: The Sense of History. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

“Longinus,” On the Sublime. Trans. W. Hamilton Fyfe. In Aristotle, The Poetics; “Longinus,” On the Sublime; Demetrius, On Style. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960.

Lootens, Tricia. “Hemans and Home: Victorianism, Feminine ‘Internal Enemies,’ and the Domestication of National Identity.” PMLA 109:2 (1994): 238–53.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lowell, Amy. John Keats. 2 vols. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1925.Google Scholar

Lyotard, Jean-François and Thébaud, Jean-Loup. Just Gaming. Trans. Wlad Godzich. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Macpherson, C. B.Burke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Magnuson, Paul. Reading Public Romanticism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.CrossRef Google Scholar

Makdisi, Saree. William Blake and the Impossible History of the 1790s. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.CrossRef Google Scholar

Manning, Peter J.Byron and His Fictions. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Manning, Peter J.“Wordsworth in The Keepsake, 1829.” In Literature in the Marketplace: Nineteenth-Century British Publishing and the Marketplace. Ed. Jordan, John O. and , Robert L. Patten. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. 44–74.Google Scholar

Marsh, Joss. Word Crimes: Blasphemy, Culture, and Literature in Nineteenth-Century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. 1852. New York: International Publishers, 1977.Google Scholar

Matthews, G. M., ed. Keats: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1971.Google Scholar

Mayo, Robert. “The Contemporaneity of the Lyrical Ballads.” PMLA 69 (1954): 486–522.CrossRef Google Scholar

McCalman, Iain. Radical Underworld: Prophets, Revolutionaries and Pornographers in London, 1795–1840. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

McCann, Andrew. Cultural Politics in the 1790s: Literature, Radicalism and the Public Sphere. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1999.CrossRef Google Scholar

McGann, Jerome J.The Beauty of Inflections: Literary Investigations in Historical Method and Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.Google Scholar

McGann, Jerome J.Don Juan in Context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.Google Scholar

McGann, Jerome J.“Keats and the Historical Method in Literary Criticism.” Modern Language Notes 94:5 (1979): 998–1032.Google Scholar

The Romantic Ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.

McGill, Meredith L.American Literature and the Culture of Reprinting, 1834–1853. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mee, John. Dangerous Enthusiasm: William Blake and the Culture of Radicalism in the 1790s. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Mellor, Anne. Romanticism and Gender. New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. “What Is Poetry?” In Mill's Essays on Literature and Society. Ed. Schneewind, J. B.. New York: Collier, 1965. 102–117.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. J. T.Iconology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Murphy, Peter T.Poetry as an Occupation and as an Art in Britain, 1760–1830. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRef Google Scholar

Negt, Oskar and Kluge, Alexander. Public Sphere and Experience: Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere. Trans. Peter Labanyi, Jamie Owen Daniel, and Assenka Oksiloff. Foreword by Miriam Hansen. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Newlyn, Lucy. Reading, Writing, and Romanticism: The Anxiety of Reception. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

“How Wordsworth Keeps His Audience Fit.” In Placing and Displacing Romanticism. Ed. Kitson, Peter J.. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001. 60–72.Google Scholar

Nicolson, Harold. Tennyson: Aspects of his Life, Character and Poetry. 1923. New York: Anchor Books, 1962.Google Scholar

Owen, W. J. B.Wordsworth as Critic. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Ozouf, Mona. “‘Public Opinion’ at the End of the Old Regime.” In The Rise and Fall of the French Revolution. Ed. Blanning, T. C. W.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996. 90–110.Google Scholar

Page, Judith W.Wordsworth and the Cultivation of Women. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Paine, Thomas. Rights of Man. 1791. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985.Google Scholar

Paley, Morton. “Apocapolitics: Allusion and Structure in Shelley's The Mask of Anarchy.” Huntington Library Quarterly 54:2 (1991): 91–109.CrossRef Google Scholar

Paulson, Ronald. Representations of Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Paulson, RonaldBreaking and Remaking: Aesthetic Practice in England, 1700–1820. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Peacock, Markman L. Jr., ed. The Critical Opinions of William Wordsworth. New York: Octagon, 1969.Google Scholar

Perkins, David. Wordsworth and the Poetry of Sincerity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pfau, Thomas. Wordsworth's Profession: Form, Class, and the Logic of Early Romantic Cultural Production. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Pfau, Thomas“Paranoia Historicized: Legal Fantasy, Social Change, and Satiric Meta-Commentary in the 1794 Treason Trials.” In Behrendt, ed. Romanticism, Radicalism, and the Press. 30–64.

Pinch, Adela. Strange Fits of Passion: Epistemologies of Emotion, Hume to Austen. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Pitkin, Hannah. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Plato, . Phaedrus. Trans. Alexander Nehamas and Paul Woodruff. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1995.Google Scholar

Plotz, John. The Crowd: British Literature and Public Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Plumb, J. H. “The Commercialization of Leisure in Eighteenth-century England.” In McKendrick, Neil, Brewer, John, and Plumb, J. H.. The Birth of a Consumer Society: The Commercialization of Eighteenth-Century England. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982. 265–285.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. “Burke and the Ancient Constitution: A Problem in the History of Ideas.” In Politics, Language, and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History. 1971. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989. 202–32.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A.“The Varieties of Whiggism from Exclusion to Reform: A History of Ideology and Discourse.” In Virtue, Commerce, and History: Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. 215–310.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pole, J. R.Political Representation in England and the Origins of the American Republic. London: Macmillan, 1960.Google Scholar

Poovey, Mary. The Proper Lady and the Woman Writer: Ideology as Style in the Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley, and Jane Austen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Pope, Alexander. The Poems of Alexander Pope. Ed. Butt, John. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pottle, Frederick A. “The Case of Shelley.” In Abrams, ed. English Romantic Poets. 366–83.

Rajan, Tilottama. The Supplement of Reading: Figures of Understanding in Romantic Theory and Practice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Reid, John Phillip. The Concept of Representation in the Age of the American Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Reiman, Donald H., ed. The Romantic Reviewed: Contemporary Reviews of British Romantic Writers. Part C. 2 vols. New York: Garland, 1972.Google Scholar

“Remarks on Don Juan.” In Byron. The Complete Miscellaneous Prose. 361–65.

Ricks, Christopher. Keats and Embarrassment. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Robbins, Bruce. “Introduction: The Public Sphere as Phantom.” In The Phantom Public Sphere. Ed. Bruce, Robbins. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.

Roberts, Hugh. Shelley and the Chaos of History: A New Politics of Poetry. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Roe, Nicholas. John Keats and the Culture of Dissent. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Rose, Mark. “The Author as Proprietor: Donaldson v. Becket and the Genealogy of Modern Authorship.” Representations 23 (1988): 51–85.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rose, MarkAuthors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Ross, Marlon B. “Shelley's Wayward Dream-Poem: The Apprehending Reader in Prometheus Unbound.” Keats-Shelley Journal 36 (1987): 110–33.Google Scholar

Ross, Marlon B.The Contours of Masculine Desire: Romanticism and the Rise of Women's Poetry. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Rutherford, Andrew, ed. Byron: The Critical Heritage. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1970.Google Scholar

Rzepka, Charles. The Self as Mind: Vision and Identity in Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Keats. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986.CrossRef Google Scholar

Saunders, David and Hunter, Ian. “Lessons from the ‘Literatory’: How to Historicise Authorship.” Critical Inquiry 17:3 (1991): 479–509.CrossRef Google Scholar

Scott, Grant F. “Beautiful Ruins: The Elgin Marbles Sonnet in Its Historical and Generic Contexts.” Keats-Shelley Journal 39 (1990): 123–50.Google Scholar

Scrivener, Michael Henry. Radical Shelley: The Philosophical Anarchism and Utopian Thought of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982.CrossRef Google Scholar

Scrivener, Michael Henryed. Poetry and Reform: Periodical Verse from the English Democratic Press, 1792–1824. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Scrivener, Michael HenrySeditious Allegories: John Thelwall and Jacobin Writing. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William. Macbeth. Ed. Orgel, Stephen. London: Penguin Books, 2000.Google Scholar

Sheats, Paul. The Making of Wordsworth's Poetry, 1785–1798. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1973.CrossRef Google Scholar

Shelley, Mary. The Journals of Mary Shelley, 1814–1844. Ed. Feldman, Paula R. and Scott-Kilvert, Diana. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Shelley, Percy Bysshe. Shelley's Poetry and Prose. Ed. Reiman, Donald H. and Fraistat, Neil. 2nd ed. New York: Norton, 2002.Google Scholar

Shelley, Percy ByssheThe Complete Poetical Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Ed. Hutchinson, Thomas. Corrected by G. M. Matthews. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Shelley, Percy ByssheThe Letters of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Ed. Jones, Frederick L.. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Showalter, Elaine. A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists from Brontë to Lessing. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Simpson, David. Wordsworth's Historical Imagination: The Poetry of Displacement. New York: Methuen, 1987.Google Scholar

Siskin, Clifford. The Work of Writing: Literature and Social Change in Britain, 1700–1830. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Southey, Robert. The Life and Correspondence of the Late Robert Southey. Ed. Southey, Charles Cuthbert. 6 vols. London, 1849–50.Google Scholar

Spenser, Edmund. The Poetical Works of Edmund Spenser. Ed. Smith, J. C. and Selincourt., E.London: Oxford University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Sperry, Stuart M.Keats the Poet. 1973. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

St. Clair, William. Lord Elgin and the Marbles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

St. Clair, WilliamThe Reading Nation in the Romantic Period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Stabler, Jane. Byron, Poetics, and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stallybrass, Peter and White, Allon. The Politics and Poetics of Transgression. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Stewart, Susan. Crimes of Writing: Problems in the Containment of Representation. 1991. Durham: Duke University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Swann, Karen. “Public Transport: Adventuring on Wordsworth's Salisbury Plain.” ELH 55:4 (1988): 533–53.CrossRef Google Scholar

Swartz, Richard G. “Wordsworth, Copyright, and the Commodities of Genius.” Modern Philology 89:4 (1992): 482–509.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tennyson, Alfred, Lord. The Poems of Tennyson. Ed. Ricks, Christopher. Vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Tennyson, Alfred, Lord. Tennyson's Poetry. Ed. Hill, Robert W. Jr.New York: Norton, 1971.Google Scholar

Thomas, Donald. A Long Time Burning: The History of Literary Censorship in England. New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1969.Google Scholar

Thompson, E. P.The Making of the English Working Class. 1963. New York: Vintage, 1966.Google Scholar

Tompkins, Jane P. “The Reader in History: The Changing Shape of Literary Response.” In Reader-Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism. Ed. Tompkins, Jane P.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980. 201–32.Google Scholar

Tucker, Herbert F.Tennyson and the Doom of Romanticism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tucker, Herbert F.“House Arrest: The Domestication of Poetry in the 1820s.” New Literary History 25 (1994): 521–48.CrossRef Google Scholar

Vaux, J. H.Flash Dictionary. London, 1812.Google Scholar

Vendler, Helen. The Odes of John Keats. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Wahrman, Dror. “Public Opinion, Violence and the Limits of Constitutional Reform.” In Re-reading the Constitution: New Narratives in the Political History of England's Long Nineteenth Century. Ed. Vernon, James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. 83–122.Google Scholar

Warner, Michael. Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books, 2002.Google Scholar

Wasserman, Earl. “The English Romantics: The Grounds of Knowledge.” Studies in Romanticism 4 (1964): 17–34.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wasserman, EarlShelley: A Critical Reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Welsh, Alexander. Strong Representations: Narrative and Circumstantial Evidence in England. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Wheatley, Kim. “The Blackwood's Attacks on Leigh Hunt,” Nineteenth-Century Literature 47:1 (1992): 131.CrossRef Google Scholar

White, Newman Ivey. “Shelley and the Active Radicals of the Early Nineteenth Century.” South Atlantic Quarterly 29:3 (1930): 248–61.Google Scholar

White, R. J., ed. Political Tracts of Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Shelley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Wickwar, William H.The Struggle for the Freedom of the Press, 1819–1832. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1928.Google Scholar

Wilde, Oscar. “The Decay of Lying.” In The Soul of Man Under Socialism and Selected Critical Prose. Ed. Dowling, Linda. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2001. 163–92.Google Scholar

Williams, Raymond. Culture and Society, 1780–1950. 1958. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Wilson, Milton. Shelley's Later Poetry: A Study of His Prophetic Imagination. 1957. New York: Columbia University Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Wimsatt, William K. “The Structure of Romantic Nature Imagery.” In Bloom, ed. Romanticism and Consciousness. 77–88.

Wolfson, Susan J. “‘Romantic Ideology’ and the Values of Aesthetic Form.” In Aesthetics and Ideology. Ed. Levine, George. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1994. 188–218.Google Scholar

Wolfson, Susan J.“‘Domestic Affections’ and ‘the spear of Minerva’: Felicia Hemans and the Dilemma of Gender.” In Re-visioning Romanticism: British Women Writers, 1776–1837. Ed. Wilson, Carol Shiner and Haefner, Joel. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press, 1994. 128–166.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wolfson, Susan J.Formal Charges: The Shaping of Poetry in British Romanticism. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Wolfson, Susan J.“A Lesson in Romanticism: Gendering the Soul.” In Lessons of Romanticism: A Critical Companion. Ed. Pfau, Thomas and Gleckner, Robert F.. Durham: Duke University Press, 1998. 349–75.Google Scholar

Wolfson, Susan J.“Felicia Hemans and the Revolving Doors of Reception.” In Linkin and Behrendt, eds. Romanticism and Women Poets. 214–41.

Wolfson, Susan J.ed. Felicia Hemans: Selected Poems, Letters, Reception Materials. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Wood, Marcus. Radical Satire and Print Culture, 1790–1822. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Woodmansee, Martha. “The Genius and the Copyright: Economic and Legal Conditions of the Emergence of the ‘Author.’” Eighteenth-Century Studies 17:4 (1984): 425–48.CrossRef Google Scholar

Woodmansee, MarthaThe Author, Art, and the Market: Rereading the History of Aesthetics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Woodmansee, Marthaand Jaszi, Peter, eds. The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature. Durham: Duke University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Wordsworth, William and Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Lyrical Ballads: The Text of the 1798 Edition with the Additional 1800 Poems and the Prefaces. Ed. Brett, R. L. and Jones, A. R.. 1963. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar

Wordsworth, William and Samuel Taylor ColeridgeThe Poetical Works of William Wordsworth. Ed. Selincourt, Ernest and Darbishire, Helen. Vol. 5. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1949.Google Scholar

Wordsworth, William and Samuel Taylor ColeridgeThe Prose Works of William Wordsworth. Ed. Owen, W. J. B. and Worthington Smyser, Jane. 3 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wordsworth, William and Samuel Taylor ColeridgeWilliam Wordsworth. The Oxford Authors. Ed. Gill, Stephen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Worrall, David. Radical Culture: Discourse, Resistance, and Surveillance, 1790–1820. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Zall, Paul M. “Lord Elgin's Censorship.” PMLA 68 (1953): 436–53.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zall, Paul M. “Wordsworth and the Copyright Act of 1842.” PMLA 70:1 (1955): 132–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Sarah M.Romanticism, Lyricism, and History. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Zwicker, Steven N. “Lines of Authority: Politics and Literary Culture in the Restoration.” In Politics of Discourse: The Literature and History of Seventeenth-Century England. Ed. Sharpe, Kevin and Zwicker, Steven N.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987. 230–70.Google Scholar