Abou El Aazm, A. ‘al-Luġa al-ʿarabiyya al-ḥadīta fī muʿjam as-sabīl muʿjam tunā‘iy al-luġa’, Études lexicographiques, 2 (2003), 5–26.Google Scholar

‘About Norsk Ordbok 2014’, no2014.uio.no/eNo/tekst/framside_english.html.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. Bilingualism and the Latin Language (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Adams, M. ‘The apprentice: the origins of Mitford Mathews’ lexicography’, paper presented at the 18th Biennial Meeting of the Dictionary Society of North America, Montreal, 9 June 2011.Google Scholar

Adams, M. ‘Before DARE’, paper presented at the 19th Biennial Meeting of the Dictionary Society of North America, University of Georgia, 24 May 2013.Google Scholar

Adams, M. ‘Credit where it’s due: authority and recognition at the Dictionary of American English’, Dictionaries, 19 (1998), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, M. ‘The lexical ride of a lifetime’, American Speech, 88 (2013), 168–95.Google Scholar

Adams, M. ‘Phantom dictionaries: the Middle English Dictionary before Kurath’, Dictionaries, 23 (2002), 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, M. ‘Reading between the lines: language ideology in the Dictionary of American English’, paper presented at HEL-LEX 5, University of Zürich, 18 February 2017.Google Scholar

Adams, M. ‘The Special Relationship: Anglo-American lexicography on the eve of war’, paper presented at the International Conference on Historical Lexicography and Lexicology, St Anne’s College, University of Oxford, 18 June 2010.Google Scholar

Adams, M. ‘Words of America: a field guide’, Humanities, 32.5 (2011), 14–19 and 53.Google Scholar

Adelaar, W., with Muysken, P. C.. The Languages of the Andes (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Adler, A. ‘Suidas [1]’ in Paulys Realencyclopädie A 4.1, 675–717.Google Scholar

Aerts, W. J. ‘The Monza vocabulary’ in Bakker, W. F., Gemert, A. F. Van, and Aerts, W. J. (eds.), Studia Byzantina et Neohellenica Neerlandica (Leiden: Brill, 1972), 36–73.Google Scholar

Afane-Otsaga, T. ‘Lexicography of Fang’ in Gouws, et al. (eds.), Dictionaries: Supplementary Volume, 962–3.Google Scholar

ʿAfīfī, R. ‘Anjomanārā, Farhang-e’ in Encyclopædia Iranica.Google Scholar

Ahlqvist, A. (ed.). The Early Irish Linguist: An Edition of the Canonical Part of the Auraicept na nÉces with Introduction, Commentary, and Indices (Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica, 1982).Google Scholar

Jaewon, Ahn and Hyun-Kwon, Kim. ‘Parvum vocabularium Latino–Coreanum gwa Nahansajeon-ui hagjeog gachiwa jung-yoseong-e daehayeo’, Journal of Korealex, 7 (2006), 7–33.Google Scholar

Aitken, A. J. ‘The period dictionaries’, in Burchfield, (ed.), Studies in Lexicography, 94–116.Google Scholar

Akhtar, M. S. ‘Dhārvāl, Qāżī Khan Badr Moḥammad Dehlavī’ in Encyclopædia Iranica.Google Scholar

Alam, M. ‘The pursuit of Persian: language in Mughal politics’, Modern Asian Studies, 32.2 (1998), 317–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ALECSO, www.arabization.org.ma/.Google Scholar

Algaze, G. ‘Initial social complexity in southwestern Asia: the Mesopotamian advantage’, Current Anthropology, 42.2 (2001), 199–233.Google Scholar

Allon, M. Style and Function: A Study of the Dominant Stylistic Features of the Prose Sections of Pāli Canonical Sutta Texts and Their Mnemonic Function (Tokyo: International Institute for Buddhist Studies, 1997).Google Scholar

Allsopp, J. ‘Dictionaries of Caribbean English’, in Cowie, (ed.), Oxford History of English Lexicography, I.353–77.Google Scholar

Allsopp, R. ‘A critical commentary on the Dictionary of Jamaican English’, Caribbean Studies, 10.2 (1970), 90–117.Google Scholar

Alpers, K. Das attizistische Lexikon des Oros (Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 1981).Google Scholar

Alpers, K. Bericht über Stand und Methode der Ausgabe des Etymologicum genuinum (Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1969).Google Scholar

Alpers, K. ‘Eine byzantinische Enzyklopädie des 9. Jahrhunderts: Zu Hintergrund, Entstehung und Geschichte des griechischen Etymologikons in Konstantinopel und im italogriechischen Bereich’ in Cavallo, G., De Gregorio, G., and Maniaci, M. (eds.), Scritture, libri e testi nelle aree provinciali di Bisanzio: Atti del seminario di Erice (18–25 settembre 1988) (Spoleto: Centro Italiano di Studi sull’Alto Medioevo, 1991), 235–69.Google Scholar

Alpers, K. ‘Difficult problems in the transmission and interrelation of the Greek etymologica’ in Xenis, G. A. (ed.), Literature, Scholarship, Philosophy, and History: Classical Studies in Memory of Ioannis Taifacos (Stuttgart: Steiner, 2015), 293–314.Google Scholar

Alpers, K. ‘Griechische Lexikographie in Antike und Mittelalter, dargestellt an ausgewählten Beispielen’ in Koch, H.-A. (ed.), Welt der Information: Wissen und Wissensvermittlung in Geschichte und Gegenwart (Stuttgart: Metzler, 1990), 14–38.Google Scholar

Alpers, K. ‘Ein Handschriftenfund zum Cyrill-Glossar in der Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Bremen’, in Hörandner, W. and Trapp, E. (eds.), Lexicographica Byzantina (Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1991), 11–52.Google Scholar

Alpers, K. ‘Marginalien zur Überlieferung der griechischen Etymologika’ in Harlfinger, D. and Prato, G. (eds.), Paleografia e codicologia greca, 2 vols. (Alessandria, Italy: Edizioni dell’Orso, 1991), I.523–41.Google Scholar

Alpers, K. ‘Review of Daly, Contributions to a History of Alphabetization’, Gnomon, 47 (1975), 113–17.Google Scholar

Alpers, K. ‘“Zonarae” Lexicon’ in Paulys Realencyclopädie A.10, 732–63.Google Scholar

Alsford, N., and Fuehrer, B.. ‘Carstairs Douglas (1830–1877) and his Chinese–English Dictionary of the Vernacular or Spoken Language of Amoy (1873)’, Journal of Translation Studies, 1.1 (2017), 137–82.Google Scholar

Alster, B. Proverbs of Ancient Sumer: The World’s Earliest Proverb Collections (Bethesda: CDL, 1997).Google Scholar

Alster, B. ‘Some new Sumerian proverbs’ in Barjamovic, G. et al. (eds.), Akkade Is King: A Collection of Papers by Friends and Colleagues Presented to Aage Westenholz on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday, 15th of May 2009 = Publications de l’Institut Historique et Archéologique Néerlandais de Stamboul 118 (Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, 2011), 9–27.Google Scholar

Alston, R. C. A Bibliography of the English Language 1500–1800, 21 vols. in 39 parts (Leeds etc.: for the author, [1965]–2011).Google Scholar

Alvar Ezquerra, M. ‘Los diccionarios del español en su historia’, International Journal of Lexicography, 8.3 (1995), 173–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Āl Yāsīn, M. Ḥ. al-Dirāsāt al-luġawiyya ʿinda l-ʿArab ilā nihāyat al-qarn al-ṯāliṯ (Beirut: Dār Maktabat al-Ḥayāt, 1980).Google Scholar

Amīn, A. Ḍuḥā l-Islām, 2nd edn, 3 vols. (Cairo: Laǧnat al-Taʾlīf wa-l-Tarǧama wa-l-Našr, 1938).Google Scholar

Anderson, B. R. O’G. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London: Verso, 1983).Google Scholar

Andrews, J. R. Introduction to Classical Nahuatl, rev. edn (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Aoki, Takashi 青木孝. ‘Jisho, sakuin sakusei no rekishi’ 辞書・索引作成の歴史. in Saeki, Umetomo 佐伯梅友, Nakada, Norio 中田祝夫, and Hayashi, Ōki 林大 (eds.), Kokugogaku 国語学 = Kokugo kokubungaku kenkyūshi taisei 15 (Tokyo: Sanseidō, 1961), 226–79.Google Scholar

Arabic Gigaword Corpus, 2nd edn, ed. Graff, D. (Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, 2006).Google Scholar

ArabiCorpus, ed. Parkinson, D., arabicorpus.byu.edu.Google Scholar

Aranha, P. ‘Vulgaris seu universalis: early modern missionary representations of an Indian cosmopolitan space’ in Flores, J., Lefèvre, C., and Županov, I. G. (eds.), Cosmopolitismes en Asie du Sud: sources, itinéraires, langues (XVIe–XVIIIe siècle) ([Paris]: Éditions de l’École des hautes études en sciences sociales, 2015), 331–60.Google Scholar

Århammer, N. ‘Friesische Lexikographie’ in Hausmann, et al., Wörterbücher, II.2022–36.Google Scholar

Arlotto, A. T. ‘Jones and Coeurdoux: correction to a footnote’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 89.2 (1969), 416–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arts, T. ‘The making of a large English–Arabic/Arabic–English dictionary: the Oxford Arabic Dictionary’ in Abel, A., Vettori, C., and Ralli, N. (eds.), Proceedings of the XVI EURALEX International Congress: The User in Focus (Bolzano: Institute for Specialised Communication and Multilingualism, 2014), 109–23, euralex.org.Google Scholar

Arts, T., and McNeil, K.. ‘Corpus-based lexicography in a language with a long lexicographical tradition: The case of Arabic’ in Atwell, E. and Hardie, A. (eds.), Proceedings of WACL’2: Second Workshop on Arabic Corpus Linguistics (2013), [14–16], www.academia.edu/7758383.Google Scholar

Aruṇācalam, Mu. Tamiḻ Ilakkiya Varalāṟu, new edn, 14 vols. (Chennai: Ti Pārkkar, 2005).Google Scholar

Ashgate Critical Essays on Early English Lexicographers, 5 vols. (Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2012).Google Scholar

Ashtor, E. Qorot haYhudim bi-Sfarad haMuslamit, 2 vols. (Jerusalem: Kiryat Sefer, 1977).Google Scholar

Aslanov, C. Le provençal des Juifs et l’hébreu en Provence: le dictionnaire ‘Šaršot ha-Kesef’ de Joseph Caspi (Paris: Peeters, 2001).Google Scholar

Assunção, C. ‘Portuguese missionary work and inter-linguistic contact in the east’, in Metamorfoses: 25 anos do Departamento de Letras – Artes e Comunicação (Vila Real: Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Centro de Estudos em Letras, 2011), 91–117.Google Scholar

Atsuji, Tetsuji. ‘Kanwa jiten no rekishi’ in Jiten kyōkai, Nihon no jisho no ayumi, 69–94.Google Scholar

Aune, M. G. ‘Review of T. Herbert, Travels in Africa, Persia, and Asia the Great, ed. J. A. Butler (2012)’, Seventeenth-Century News, 72.3/4 (2014), 230–3.Google Scholar

Auroux, S. (ed.). Histoire des idées linguistiques, 3 vols. (Liège: Mardaga, 1989–2000).Google Scholar

Auroux, S., Koerner, E. F. K., Niederehe, H. J., and Versteegh, K. (eds.). History of the Language Sciences/Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaften/Histoire des sciences du langage, 2 vols. (Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 2000–1).Google Scholar

Austin, P. K. ‘The Gamilaraay (Kamilaroi) language, northern New South Wales: a brief history of research’ in McGregor, (ed.), Encountering Aboriginal Languages, 37–58.Google Scholar

Azar, M. ‘Milon Even-Shoshan, revisited’, Kernerman Dictionary News, 12 (2004), 32–3.Google Scholar

Baalbaki, R. M. The Arabic Lexicographical Tradition from the 2nd/8th to the 12th/18th Century (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2014).Google Scholar

Baalbaki, R. M. ‘Coinage in modern English–Arabic lexicography’, Zeitschrift für Arabische Linguistik, 43 (2004), 67–71.Google Scholar

Baalbaki, R. M. ‘The influence of poetry on the rhyme system in lexicography: evidence from Bandanīǧī’s (d. 284/897) Kitāb al-Taqfiya’, Journal of Arabic Linguistics Tradition, 10 (2012), 20–30.Google Scholar

Baalbaki, R. M. ‘Introduction: the early Islamic grammatical tradition’, in Baalbaki, R. (ed.), The Early Islamic Grammatical Tradition = The Formation of the Classical Islamic World, 36 (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007), xiii–l.Google Scholar

Baalbaki, R. M. The Legacy of the ‘Kitāb’: Sībawayhi’s Analytical Methods Within the Context of the Arabic Grammatical Theory (Leiden: Brill, 2008).Google Scholar

Baalbaki, R. M. ‘A precursor to the rhyme system in Arabic lexicography: Ibn al-Sikkīt’s (d. 244/858) chapter on faʿl and faʿal in Iṣlāḥ al-Manṭiq’, al-Abḥāth, 60–1 (2012–13), 5–14.Google Scholar

Baas, P. ‘De VOC in Flora’s lusthoven’ in Blussé, and Ooms, (eds.), Kennis en compagnie, 124–37.Google Scholar

Bacher, W. Die hebräisch–neuhebräische und hebräisch–aramäische Sprachvergleichung des Abulwalîd Merwân ibn Ganâḥ (Vienna: Gerold, 1885).Google Scholar

Baevskii, S. I. Early Persian Lexicography: Farhangs of the Eleventh to the Fifteenth Centuries, trans. N. Killian (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Baevskii, S. I. ‘Farhang-e Ānandrāj’ in Encyclopædia Iranica.Google Scholar

Baevskij, S. I. Rannjaja persidskaja leksikografija XI–XV vv. (Moscow: Nauka, 1989).Google Scholar

Bagnall, R. S. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Papyrology (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Bai, Q. Fu Shan’s World: The Transformation of Chinese Calligraphy in the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2003).Google Scholar

Bailey, D. C. ‘Early Japanese lexicography’, Monumenta Nipponica, 16.1/2 (1960), 1–52.Google Scholar

Bailey, D. C. ‘The Rakuyōshū’, Monumenta Nipponica, 16.3/4 (1960–1), 289–376.Google Scholar

Bailey, D. C. ‘The Rakuyōshū II: the Irohajishū and the Shōgokuhen’, Monumenta Nipponica, 17 (1962), 214–64.Google Scholar

Bailey, T. G. ‘Jamiʿ ul-lug̱āt: a new Urdu dictionary’ [review of Majid, Jāmiʿ al-lug̲h̲āt], Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, 9 (1938), 440–1.Google Scholar

Bajema, J. ‘Jewish grammarians in the lexicography of Wilhelm Gesenius, specifically the comparisons to Arabic’ (in Hebrew), unpublished PhD thesis, Hebrew University of Jerusalem (2017).Google Scholar

Balasubramanian, K. ‘Bilingual lexicography of the Indian subcontinent’ in Hausmann, et al. (eds.), Wörterbücher, III.3096–3107.Google Scholar

Baldanza, K. Ming China and Vietnam (Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Baldauf, I. ‘Missionshilfe oder Kuriositätensammlung? Das komanisch–deutsche Glossar im Codex Cumanicus (14. Jh.)’ in Kreiser, K., Germano-Turcica. Zur Geschichte des Türkisch-Lernens in den deutschsprachigen Ländern (Bamberg: Universitätsbibliothek, 1987), 15‒18.Google Scholar

Balode, I. Deutsch–lettische Lexikographie: eine Untersuchung zu ihrer Tradition und Regionalität im 18. Jahrhundert (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 2002).Google Scholar

Bandle, O., et al. (eds.). The Nordic Languages: An International Handbook of the History of the North Germanic Languages, 2 vols. (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2002–2005).Google Scholar

Barnes, M. P. ‘Language cultivation and language planning V: Faroe Islands’ in Bandle, et al. (eds.), Nordic Languages, II.2007–12.Google Scholar

Barreto, L. F. ‘Reseña de “Dicionário Português-Chinês” de John W. Witek (ed.)’, Bulletin of Portuguese/Japanese Studies, 5 (2002), 117–26.Google Scholar

Bartelmus, A. Fragmente einer grossen Sprache: Sumerisch im Kontext der Schreiberausbildung des kassitenzeitlichen Babylonien = Untersuchungen zur Assyriologie und vorderasiatischen Archäologie, 12 (Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2016).Google Scholar

Bartholomew, D. A., and Schoenhals, L. C.. Bilingual Dictionaries for Indigenous Languages (Mexico City: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano, 1983).Google Scholar

Baxter, W. A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992).Google Scholar

Beal, J. C. ‘The contribution of the Rev. Joseph Hunter’s Hallamshire Glossary (1829) to Wright’s English Dialect Dictionary’, in Markus, et al. (eds.), Joseph Wright’s ‘English Dialect Dictionary’ and Beyond, 39–48.Google Scholar

Beal, J. C. ‘Enregisterment, commodification, and historical context: “Geordie” versus “Sheffieldish”’, American Speech, 84 (2009), 138–56.Google Scholar

Bečka, J. ‘Afghan dictionaries’, Archív Orientální, 53 (1985), 69–70.Google Scholar

Becker, D. Mǝqorot ᶜarviyim lǝ-diqduqo šel Rabbi Yona ibn Janāḥ (Tel Aviv University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Beckerath, J. von. Chronologie des pharaonischen Ägypten = Münchner Ägyptologische Studien, 46 (Mainz: Zabern, 1997).Google Scholar

Bedell, G. ‘Kokugaku grammatical theory’, unpublished PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1968).Google Scholar

Beekman, E. M. Fugitive Dreams: An Anthology of Dutch Colonial Literature (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Béjoint, H. The Lexicography of English: From Origins to Present (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Benarroch, M. ‘L’apport des dictionnaires de Jerónimo Cardoso (16e siècle) à la datation du Dicionário Houaiss (2001)’ in Iliescu, M. et al. (eds.), Actes du 25e Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes: Innsbruck, 3–8 septembre 2007 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2010), 623–32.Google Scholar

Bender, E. ‘Review of Deshpande and Deshpande, Universal English–Gujarati Dictionary’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 112.1 (1992), 169–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bendor-Samuel, J. ‘Adaptations of the Roman alphabet: African languages’ in Daniels, and Bright, (eds.), The World’s Writing Systems, 689–91.Google Scholar

Beni, K. N. ‘Historique des dictionnaires bilingues (dictionnaires persan–français et français–persan)’, La revue de Téhéran, no. 95 (October 2013), www.teheran.ir/.Google Scholar

Benson, T. G. ‘A century of Bantu lexicography’, African Language Studies, 5 (1964), 64–91.Google Scholar

Benzehra, R. ‘Issues and challenges for a modern English–Arabic dictionary’, Dictionaries, 33 (2012), 83–102.Google Scholar

Benzie, W. Dr. F. J. Furnivall: A Victorian Scholar Adventurer (Norman, OK: Pilgrim, 1983).Google Scholar

Benzing, J. Bibliographie der Schriften Johannes Reuchlins im 15. und 16. Jahrhundert (Bad Bocklet etc.: W. Krieg, 1955).Google Scholar

Bergenholtz, H., and Pálfi, L.-L., ‘Videnskabernes Selskabs Ordbog: das erste dänische Nationalwörterbuch’ in Haß, (ed.), Große Lexika, 137–47.Google Scholar

Bergmann, R. Verzeichnis der althochdeutschen und altsächsischen Glossenhandschriften (Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1973).Google Scholar

Bergmann, R., Glaser, E., and Moulin-Fankhänel, C. (eds.). Mittelalterliche volkssprachige Glossen (Heidelberg: Winter, 2001).Google Scholar

Bex, T., and Watts, R. J., (eds.). Standard English: The Widening Debate (London: Routledge, 1999).Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, S. ‘Experts question roots of “Modern” Assamese: reprint of Nathan Brown’s original 1848 grammar creates flutter in the state’s literary circles’, Telegraph (India), 19 July 2011.Google Scholar

Birwé, R. ‘The Amarakośa and the lexicographical chapters of the Agnipurāṇa’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 96.3 (1976), 383–403.Google Scholar

Birwé, R. ‘Fragments from Three Lost Kośas: Vyāḍi’s Utpalinī II’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 87.1 (1967), 39–52.Google Scholar

Black, R. Humanism and Education in Medieval and Renaissance Italy: Tradition and Innovation in Latin Schools from the Twelfth to the Fifteenth Century (Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Blackburn, S. Print, Folklore, and Nationalism in Colonial South India (Delhi: Permanent Black, 2003).Google Scholar

Blair, A. Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information Before the Modern Age (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Blau, J. ‘Millonim Miqra’iyyim.’ Encyclopaedia Biblica (Jerusalem: Mossad Bialik, 1962), vol. IV, cols. 901–9.Google Scholar

Blekastad, M. Comenius: Versuch eines Umrisses von Leben, Werk und Schicksal des Jan Amos Komenský (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1969).Google Scholar

Blochmann, H. ‘Contributions to Persian lexicography’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Bengal, 37.1 (1868), 1–72.Google Scholar

Blom, A. H. ‘Endlicher’s glossary’, Études Celtiques, 37 (2011), 159–81.Google Scholar

Blum, R. Kallimachos: The Alexandrian Library and the Origins of Bibliography (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Blussé, L., and Ooms, I. (eds.). Kennis en compagnie: de Verenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie en de moderne wetenschap (Amsterdam: Balans, 2002).Google Scholar

Boisson, C., Kirtschuk, P., and Béjoint, H., ‘Aux origines de la lexicographie: les premiers dictionnaires monolingues et bilingues’, International Journal of Lexicography, 4.4 (1991), 261–315.Google Scholar

Bol, P. K. ‘Wang Anshi and the Zhouli’ in Elman, B. A. and Kern, M. (eds.), Statecraft and Classical Learning: The ‘Rituals of Zhou’ in East Asian History (Leiden: Brill, 2010), 229–51.Google Scholar

Bollée, A. ‘Lexicographie créole: problèmes et perspectives’, Revue française de linguistique appliquée, 10 (2005), 53–63.Google Scholar

Bombaci, A. ‘Una lettera turca in caratteri latini del dragomanno ottomano Ibrāhīm al veneziano Michele Membre (1567)’, Rocznik Orientalistyczny, 15 (1939–49), 129–44.Google Scholar

Bonvini, E. ‘Les deux premières grammaires françaises du Wolof (Sénégal): une systématisation contrastée’, Histoire Épistémologie Langage, 23 (2001), 101–16.Google Scholar

Bonvini, E. ‘Repères pour une histoire des connaissances linguistiques des langues africaines 1. Du XVIe siècle au XVIIIe siècle: dans le sillage des explorations’, Histoire Épistémologie Langage, 18 (1996), 127–48.Google Scholar

Borjian, H. ‘Tajikistan V: dictionaries’ in Encyclopædia Iranica.Google Scholar

Bortolami, G. ‘I Bakongo: società, tradizioni, e cambiamento in Angola’, unpublished PhD thesis, Università degli Studi di Sassari (2012).Google Scholar

Bostock, J. K. A Handbook on Old High German Literature, 2nd edn, revised by King, K. C. and McLintock, D. R. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976).Google Scholar

Botley, P. Learning Greek in Western Europe, 1396–1529: Grammars, Lexica, and Classroom Texts (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 2010).Google Scholar

Botta, A. F. The Aramaic and Egyptian Legal Traditions at Elephantine (London: Clark, 2009).Google Scholar

Bottéro, F. ‘Le développement des livres de rimes en dictionnaires: Qièyùn et Kānmiù bǔquē Qièyùn’ in Cao, Guangshun et al. (eds.), Breaking Down the Barriers: Interdisciplinary Studies in Chinese Linguistics and Beyond, 2 vols. (Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica, 2013), II.1031–50.Google Scholar

Bottéro, F. ‘The Qièyùn manuscripts from Dūnhuáng’ in Galambos, I. (ed.), Studies in Chinese Manuscripts: From the Warring States Period to the 20th Century (Budapest: Institute of East Asian Studies, 2013), 1–34.Google Scholar

Bottéro, F. Sémantisme et classification dans l’écriture chinoise: les systèmes de classement des caractères par clés du Shuowen jiezi au Kangxi zidian (Paris: Institut des Hautes Études Chinoises, Collège de France, 1996).Google Scholar

Bottéro, F., and Harbsmeier, C.. Chinese Lexicography on Matters of the Heart: An Exploratory Commentary on the Heart Radical in Shuō wén jiě zì 說文解字 (Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Centre des Recherches Linguistiques sur l’Asie Orientale, 2016).Google Scholar

Boulhol, P. Grec langaige n’est pas doulz au françois: Étude et enseignement du grec dans la France ancienne (Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires de Provence, 2014).Google Scholar

Branner, D. P. (ed.). The Chinese Rime Tables: Linguistic Philosophy and Historical-Comparative Phonology (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2006).Google Scholar

Branner, D. P. ‘Notes on the beginnings of systematic dialect description and comparison in Chinese’, Historiographia Linguistica, 24.3 (1997), 235–66.Google Scholar

Branner, D. P. ‘The Suí-Táng tradition of Fǎnqiè phonology’ in Auroux, et al. (eds.), History of the Language Sciences, I.36–46.Google Scholar

Branner, D. P., and Meng, Y.-Y., ‘Curious lexicographic relic of the Cultural Revolution’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 3rd ser., 23.4 (2013), 551–82.Google Scholar

Branner, D. P, and Yi, W.. Yīntōng: Chinese Phonological Database, americanorientalsociety.org/yintong/.Google Scholar

Brásio, A. (ed.). Monumenta Missionaria Africana, 15 vols. (Lisbon: [imprint varies], 1952–88).Google Scholar

Bray, L. ‘La lexicographie française des origines à Littré’ in Hausmann, et al. (eds.), Wörterbücher, II.1788–1818.Google Scholar

Breatnach, L. A Companion to the Corpus iuris Hibernici (Dublin: School of Celtic Studies, 2005).Google Scholar

Breen, Q. ‘The Observationes in M. T. Ciceronem of Marius Nizolius’, Studies in the Renaissance, 1 (1954), 49–58.Google Scholar

Brewer, C. ‘OED Online re-launched: distinguishing old scholarship from new’, Dictionaries, 28 (2013), 101–26.Google Scholar

Brewer, C. ‘Pronouncing the P: prescription or description in English 19th- and 20th-century dictionaries?’, Historiographia Linguistica, 34 (2007), 257–80.Google Scholar

Brewer, C. ‘Shakespeare, word-coining, and the OED’, Shakespeare Survey, 65 (2013), 345–57.Google Scholar

Brewer, C. ‘“That reliance on the ordinary”: Jane Austen and the Oxford English Dictionary’, Review of English Studies, 66 (2015), 744–65.Google Scholar

Brewer, C. Treasure-House of the Language: The Living OED (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Brisman, S. History and Guide to Judaic Dictionaries and Concordances (Hoboken, NJ: KTAV, 2000).Google Scholar

Brody, R. The Geonim of Babylonia and the Shaping of Medieval Jewish Culture (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Bronner, D. ‘Dry-point glosses in Irish manuscripts’ (2015), halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr.Google Scholar

Bronner, Y. Extreme Poetry: The South Asian Movement of Simultaneous Narration (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Brose, M. C. ‘Uyghur technologists of writing and literacy in Mongol China’, T’oung Pao, 91.4/5 (2005), 396–435.Google Scholar

Brovarski, E. ‘Two Old Kingdom writing boards from Giza’, Annales du Service des Antiquités de l’Égypte, 71 (1987), 27–52.Google Scholar

Brown, C. P. Essay on the Language and Literature of the Telugus (Chennai: Pharoah, 1839).Google Scholar

Browning, R. ‘Teachers’, in Cavallo, G. (ed.), The Byzantines (University of Chicago Press, 1997), 95–116.Google Scholar

Buchi, E., and Renders, P.. ‘Gallo-Romance I: historical and etymological lexicography’ in Gouws, et al. (eds.), Dictionaries: Supplementary Volume, 653–62.Google Scholar

Buckwalter, T., and Parkinson, D.. ‘Modern lexicography’ in Owens, J. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Arabic Linguistics (Oxford University Press, 2013), 539–60.Google Scholar

Buenaventura de Carrocera, A. ‘Los capuchinos espanoles en el Congo y el primer Diccionario congolés’, Missionalia Hispanica, 5 (1945), 209–30.Google Scholar

Bukhārī, S. Y. ‘Maulvī Sayyid Aḥmad Dihlavī’ in Dihlavī, S. A., Rusūm-i dihlī (Rampur: Kitābkār, 1965), 12–35.Google Scholar

Burchfield, R. W. (ed.). Studies in Lexicography (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Burdett-Jones, M. T. ‘Early Welsh dictionaries’, in Jones, P. H. and Rees, E. (eds.), A Nation and Its Books: A History of the Book in Wales (Aberystwyth: National Library of Wales, 1998), 75–81.Google Scholar

Burgess, M. A. ‘The Kunmunya years: an evaluation of the contribution of Rev. J. R. B. Love to Australian Aboriginal studies’, unpublished B.A. (Hons) thesis, Australian National University (1986).Google Scholar

Buringh, E. Medieval Manuscript Production in the Latin West (Leiden: Brill, 2011).Google Scholar

Burjiyān, Ḥ. ‘Farhangnivīsī dar Tājīkistān’, Irānshināsī, 11.1 (1999), 125–45.Google Scholar

Burkard, G. ‘Bibliotheken im alten Ägypten’, Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis, 4 (1980), 79–115.Google Scholar

Burke, P. Languages and Communities in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Burnett, S. G. From Christian Hebraism to Jewish Studies: Johannes Buxtorf (1564–1629) and Hebrew Learning in the Seventeenth Century (Leiden: Brill, 1996).Google Scholar

Burns, S. L. ‘The politics of philology in Japan: ancient texts, language, and Japanese identity’ in Pollock, S., Elman, B. A., and Chang, K. K. (eds.), World Philology (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015), 245–63.Google Scholar

Bursill-Hall, G. L. A Census of Medieval Latin Grammatical Manuscripts (Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 1981).Google Scholar

Busane, M. ‘Lexicography in central Africa: the user perspective, with special reference to Zaïre’ in Hartmann, R. R. K. (ed.), Lexicography in Africa (University of Exeter Press, 1990), 19–35.Google Scholar

Calhoun, D. ‘Reading paratexts in missionary linguistic works: an analysis of the preface to the Holy Ghost Fathers’ (1855), Dictionnaire français–wolof et wolof–français’, Language & History, 60.1 (2017), 53–72.Google Scholar

Callanan, C. K. Die Sprachbeschreibung bei Aristophanes von Byzanz (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1987).Google Scholar

Calvo Pérez, J. El Arte y Vocabulario en la Lengua General del Perú, llamada Quichua y en la lengua española (1586): estudio (Madrid: Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo, 2009).Google Scholar

Calvo Pérez, J. ‘El concepto de diccionario bilingüe y su aplicación a las relaciones entre el español y las lenguas amerindias’ in Calvo Pérez, J. and Carlos Godenzzi, J. (eds.), Multilingüismo y educación bilingüe en América y España (Cuzco: Centro de Estudios Regionales Andinos ‘Bartolomé de las Casas’, 1997), 257–82.Google Scholar

Calvo Pérez, J. ‘El vocabulario de Velasco 1787: finalidad de su confección’, Lexis, 25.1/2 (2001), 33–49.Google Scholar

Cancino Cabello, N. ‘Los tratados millcayac y allentiac (1607) de Luis de Valdivia: noticia de un hallazgo bibliográfico’, Onomázein, 37 (2017), 112–43.Google Scholar

Capell, A. ‘History of research in Australian and Tasmanian languages’ in Sebeok (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics, vol. VIII, Linguistics in Oceania, 661–720.Google Scholar

Capell, A., and Coate, H. H. J.. Comparative Studies in Northern Kimberley Languages (Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, 1984).Google Scholar

Carey, H. M. ‘Lancelot Threlkeld and missionary linguistics in Australia to 1850’ in Zwartjes, and Hovdhaugen, (eds.), Missionary Linguistics, 253–75.Google Scholar

Carter, M. G. ‘Arabic lexicography’ in Young, M. J. L., Latham, J. D., and Serjeant, R. B. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Arabic Literature, vol. III, Religion, Learning, and Science in the ʿAbbasid Period (Cambridge University Press, 1990), 106–17.Google Scholar

Cassidy, F. G. ‘On collecting American dialect’, American Speech, 23 (1948), 185–93.Google Scholar

Cassidy, F. G. ‘The meaning of “regional” in DARE’, American Speech, 48 (1973), 282–9.Google Scholar

Cassidy, F. G., with Duckert, A. R.. A Method for Collecting Dialect = Publication of the American Dialect Society, 20 (Gainesville, FL: American Dialect Society, 1953).Google Scholar

Cavigneaux, A. ‘Lexikalische Listen’, in Reallexikon der Assyriologie und vorderasiatischen Archäologie, ed. Ebeling, E. et al. (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1932–), VI.609–41.Google Scholar

Cellerini, A. Introduzione all’Etymologicum Gudianum (Rome: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 1988).Google Scholar

Ceresa, M. ‘Favorino, Guarino’ in Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani.Google Scholar

Chabata, E. ‘An advanced dictionary? Similarities and differences between Duramazwi ReChiShona and Duramazwi Guru ReChiShona’, Lexikos, 12 (2002), 105–16.Google Scholar

Chabata, E. ‘Lexicography of Shona’, in Gouws, et al. (eds.), Dictionaries: Supplementary Volume, 947–52.Google Scholar

Chalmers, A. The General Biographical Dictionary, 32 vols. (London: Nichols et al., 1812–17).Google Scholar

Chambon, J. P. ‘Brèves remarques sur le Tresor dóu Felibrige de Frédéric Mistral’, Revue de linguistique romane, 74 (2010), 199–214.Google Scholar

Chamorro, G. ‘Un diccionario manuscrito castellano–guaraní anónimo’, Corpus: Archivos virtuales de la alteridad americana, 4.2 (2014), 1–23.Google Scholar

Chatelain, H. Folk-Tales of Angola: Fifty Tales, with Ki-mbundu Text, Literal English Translation, Introduction, and Notes (Boston and New York: American Folk-Lore Society, 1894).Google Scholar

Chen, P. Modern Chinese: History and Sociolinguistics (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Chen, Xinxiong 陳新雄. Guangyun yanjiu 廣韻研究 (Taipei: Taiwan xuesheng shuju, 2004).Google Scholar

Chevillard, J.-L. ‘The challenge of bi-directional translation as experienced by the first European missionary grammarians and lexicographers of Tamil’ in Aussant, É. (ed.), La traduction dans l’histoire des idées linguistiques: Représentations et pratiques (Paris: Geuthner, 2015), 111–30.Google Scholar

Chevillard, J.-L. ‘How Tamil was described once again: towards an XML-encoding of the Grammatici Tamulici’, Histoire Epistémologie Langage, 39.2 (2017), 103–27.Google Scholar

Chevillard, J.-L. ‘On a 1968 incarnation of the Piṅkalam, a traditional Tamil thesaurus’ in Vecherina, O., Gordiychuk, N., and Dubyanskaya, T., Tamiḻ tanta paricu: The Collection of Articles in Honor of Alexander M. Dubyanskiy (Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities, 2016), 15–28.Google Scholar

Chevillard, J.-L. ‘“Rare words” in classical Tamil literature: from the Uriyiyal to the Tivākaram’, Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 63.3 (2010), 301–17.Google Scholar

Cho, Namho. ‘Seoyang-in pyeonchan-ui gaehwagi daeyeog sajeon-e daehan jonghabjeog geomto’, Gug-eosa yeongu, 22 (2016), 47–80.Google Scholar

Choi, Kyeongbong. ‘Wongolo nam-eun choechoi ulimal sajeon, Malmoi’, Saegug-eosaenghwal, 24.3 (2014), 20–37.Google Scholar

Choueka, Y. ‘Rav-Milim: a modern dictionary for an ancient yet thriving language’, Kernerman Dictionary News, 12 (2004), 27–31.Google Scholar

Çınar, B. Miftâh-ı Lisân. Manzum Fransızca–Türkçe sözlük (Ankara: Altınpost, 2012).Google Scholar

Civil, M. ‘Ancient Mesopotamian lexicography’ in Sasson, J. M. (ed.), Civilizations of the Ancient Near East (New York: Scribner’s, 1995), 2305–14.Google Scholar

Civil, M. ‘Lexicography’ in Lieberman, S. J. (ed.), Sumerological Studies in Honor of Thorkild Jacobsen on His Seventieth Birthday, June 7, 1974 = Assyriological Studies, 20 (University of Chicago Press, 1976), 123–57.Google Scholar

Civil, M. ‘Remarks on AD-GI₄ (a.k.a. “Archaic Word List C” or “Tribute”)’, Journal of Cuneiform Studies, 65 (2013), 13–67.Google Scholar

Clackson, J. Language and Society in the Greek and Roman Worlds (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Claes, F. Bibliographisches Verzeichnis der deutschen Vokabulare und Wörterbücher, gedruckt bis 1600 (Hildesheim: Olms, 1977).Google Scholar

Claes, F. Lijst van Nederlandse wordenlijsten en woordenboeken gedrukt tot 1600 (Nieuwkoop: De Graaf, 1974).Google Scholar

Clanchy, M. T. From Memory to Written Record: England 1066–1307, 2nd edn (Oxford, UK, and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1993).Google Scholar

Clark, P. The Kokugo Revolution: Education, Identity, and Language Policy in Imperial Japan (Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, 2009).Google Scholar

Clauson, G. An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-Thirteenth-Century Turkish (Oxford University Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Clayton, M. L., and Campbell, R. J.. ‘Alonso de Molina as lexicographer’ in Frawley, et al. (eds.), Making Dictionaries, 336–90.Google Scholar

Clements, R. A Cultural History of Translation in Early Modern Japan (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Coates, A., et al. (eds.). A Catalogue of Books Printed in the Fifteenth Century Now in the Bodleian Library, Oxford, 6 vols. (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Coblin, W. S. A Handbook of ‘Phags-pa Chinese (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Coblin, W. S. ‘Robert Morrison and the phonology of mid-Qīng Mandarin’, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 3rd ser., 13.3 (2003), 339–55.Google Scholar

Coeurdoux, G.-L. ‘Réponse au Mémoire de M. l’Abbé Barthélemy’, in Histoire et mémoires de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, de 1701 à 1793 (Paris: Imprimerie Impériale, 1808), 647–67.Google Scholar

Cohen, A. ‘Making memories in a medieval miscellany’, Gesta, 48.2 (2009), 135‒52.Google Scholar

Cohen, C., and Choueka, Y.. ‘Hebrew lexicography’ in Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, V.268–72.Google Scholar

Colas, G. ‘A cultural encounter in the early 18th century: the collection of South Indian manuscripts by the French Jesuit Fathers of the Carnatic mission’ in Saraju, R. (ed.), Aspects of Manuscript Culture in South India (Leiden: Brill, 2012), 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colas, G., and Colas-Chauhan, U. (eds.). Manuscrits telugu: catalogue raisonné (Paris: Bibliothèque Nationale de France, 1995).Google Scholar

Cole, D. T. ‘The history of African linguistics to 1945’ in Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics, vol. 7: Linguistics in Sub-Saharan Africa (The Hague: Mouton, 1971), 1–29.Google Scholar

Coleridge, D. ‘Observations on the plan of the Society’s proposed New English Dictionary’, Transactions of the Philological Society, 7 (1860), 152–68.Google Scholar

Collins, J. T. ‘Language death in Maluku: the impact of the VOC’, Bijdragen tot de taal-, land- en volkenkunde/Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 159.2 (2003), 247–89.Google Scholar

Considine, J. P. Academy Dictionaries 1600–1800 (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Considine, J. P. Dictionaries in Early Modern Europe: Lexicography and the Making of Heritage (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Considine, J. P. ‘The history of the concept of lexicography’ in Assunção, C., Fernandes, G., and Kemmler, R. (eds.), History of Linguistics 2014 (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins, 2016), 31–42.Google Scholar

Considine, J. P. ‘John Jamieson, Franz Passow, and the double invention of lexicography on historical principles’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 75 (2014), 261–81.Google Scholar

Considine, J. P. ‘The lexicography of the learned languages in seventeenth-century England’ in Ashgate Critical Essays, IV.343−63.Google Scholar

Considine, J. P. ‘Parkade: one Canadianism or two Americanisms?’, American Speech, 92 (2017), 281–97.Google Scholar

Considine, J. P. ‘“Si hoc saeculo natus fuisset”: refurbishing the Catholicon for the sixteenth century’, Historiographia Linguistica, 44.2/3 (2017), 412–29.Google Scholar

Considine, J. P. Small Dictionaries and Curiosity: Lexicography and Fieldwork in Post-Medieval Europe (Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Considine, J. P. ‘Wordlists of exotic languages in seventeenth-century England’ in Ashgate Critical Essays, IV.365−75.Google Scholar

Cooper, M. ‘The Nippo Jisho’ [review of Vocabulario da lingoa de Iapam (1973)], Monumenta Nipponica, 31.4 (1976), 417–30.Google Scholar

Copp, P. F. The Body Incantatory: Spells and the Ritual Imagination in Medieval Chinese Buddhism (New York: Columbia University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Corff, O., et al. (eds.). Auf kaiserlichen Befehl erstelltes Wörterbuch des Manjurischen in fünf Sprachen ‘Fünfsprachenspiegel’: Systematisch angeordnet Wortschatz auf Manjurisch, Tibetisch, Mongolisch, Turki, und Chinesisch, 7 vols. (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2013).Google Scholar

Cormier, M., and Francœur, A.. ‘Un siècle de lexicographie au Québec: morceaux choisis’, International Journal of Lexicography, 15.1 (2002), 55–73.Google Scholar

Cornillac, G. ‘De la necessité de concevoir pour l’esquimau un dictionnaire sans mots’, Amerindia, 19/20 (1995), 203–9.Google Scholar

Corpus de textes linguistiques fondamentaux (2007–), ctlf.ens-lyon.fr.Google Scholar

Costa, D. J. ‘The St-Jérôme dictionary of Miami-Illinois’ in Wolfart, H. C. (ed.), Papers of the 36th Algonquian Conference (Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, 2005), 107–33.Google Scholar

Couto-Ferreira, M. É. ‘Etnoanatomia y patonomia del cuerpo humano en Sumerio y Acadio: el léxico Ugu-Mu’, unpublished doctoral thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 2009.Google Scholar

Cowie, A. P. (ed.). The Oxford History of English Lexicography, 2 vols. (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Cowley, A. E. (ed. and trans. ). Aramaic Papyri of the Fifth Century BC (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1923).Google Scholar

Craigie, W. A. ‘New dictionary schemes’, Transactions of the Philological Society 1925–1930 (1931), 6–9.Google Scholar

Craigie, W. A. ‘Response’, The Periodical, 15 March 1934, 24–6.Google Scholar

Crisostomo, J. Translation as Scholarship: Language, Writing, and Bilingual Education in Ancient Babylonia = Studies in Ancient Near Eastern Records, 22 (Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2018).Google Scholar

Crowley, T. Proper English? Readings in Language, History, and Cultural Identity (London: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar

Dabīrsīāqī, M. ‘Borhān-e jāmiʿ’ in Encyclopædia Iranica.Google Scholar

Dabīrsīāqī, M. ‘Borhān-e qāṭeʿ’ in Encyclopædia Iranica.Google Scholar

Dabīr Siyāqī, M. Farhang-hā-yi Fārsī va Farhang-gūnah-hā. (Tehran: Ispark, 1989).Google Scholar

Dahan, G. ‘Interpretationes nominum Hebraicorum’ in Encyclopaedia of the Middle Ages.Google Scholar

Dalby, A. A Guide to World Language Dictionaries (London: Library Association, 1998).Google Scholar

D’Alençon, É. ‘Essai de bibliographie capucino-congolaise’, Neerlandia Franciscana, 1 (1914), 33–42.Google Scholar

Dallet, C. Hangug cheonjugyohoesa, trans. An Eunglyeol and Choi Seog-u (Seoul: Hanguggyohoesayeonguso, 1987).Google Scholar

Daly, L. W. Contributions to a History of Alphabetization in Antiquity and the Middle Ages (Brussels: Latomus, 1967).Google Scholar

Daly, L. W., and Daly, B. A.. ‘Some techniques in mediaeval Latin lexicography’, Speculum, 39.2 (1964), 229–39.Google Scholar

Daniels, P. T., and Bright, W. (eds.). The World’s Writing Systems (Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Dareau, M. ‘DOST: its history and completion’, Dictionaries, 23 (2002), 208–31.Google Scholar

Dareau, M., and Macleod, I.. ‘Dictionaries of Scots’, in Cowie, (ed.), Oxford History of English Lexicography, I.302–25.Google Scholar

Datla, K. S. The Language of Secular Islam: Urdu Nationalism and Colonial India (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Datla, K. S. ‘Making a worldly vernacular’, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley (2006).Google Scholar

Debergh, M. ‘Les débuts des contacts linguistiques entre l’occident et le Japon’, Langages, 68 (1982), 27–44.Google Scholar

De Cesare, R. ‘Su di un gruppo di glosse antico-francesi in un lessico latino dell’xi secolo’, Aevum, 27 (1953), 430–48.Google Scholar

DeFrancis, J. The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy, paperback edn (Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press, 1986).Google Scholar

DeFrancis, J. Nationalism and Language Reform in China (Princeton University Press, 1950).Google Scholar

Dehkhoda Lexicon Institute, https://icps.ut.ac.ir/about-lexicon-e.html.Google Scholar

De Kind, J., de Schryver, G.-M., and Bostoen, K.. ‘Pushing back the origin of Bantu lexicography: the Vocabularium Congense of 1652, 1928, 2012’, Lexikos, 22 (2012), 159–94.Google Scholar

Delling, G. ‘Das erste griechisch–lateinisch Wörterbuch zum Neuen Testament’, Novum Testamentum, 18.3 (1976), 213–40.Google Scholar

Delsaerdt, P. ‘De kennismachines van Cornelis Kiliaan: een typografische analyse van drie Nederlandse woordenboeken uit de 16de eeuw’, in Van Hal, T., Isebaert, L., and Swiggers, P. (eds.), De tuin der talen: Taalstudie en taalcultuur in de Lage Landen, 1450–1750 (Leuven etc.: Peeters, 2013), 93–121.Google Scholar

Den Besten, H. ‘A badly harvested field: the growth of linguistic knowledge and the Dutch Cape Colony until 1796’, in Huigen, et al. (eds.), The Dutch Trading Companies as Knowledge Networks, 267–94.Google Scholar

Denis, D., and D’Arcy, A.. ‘Settler colonial Englishes are distinct from postcolonial Englishes’, American Speech, 93 (2018), 3–31.Google Scholar

Department of Bantu Education. SiSwati Orthography: Terminology and Spelling Rules (Pretoria: Government Printer, 1980).Google Scholar

de Reuse, W. J. ‘Apache names in Spanish and early Mexican documents: what they can tell us about the early contact Apache dialect situation’ in Seymour, (ed.), From the Land of Ever Winter to the American Southwest, 271–85.Google Scholar

de Reuse, W. J. ‘A new classification of Western Apache dialects’, paper presented at the VIII Encuentro de Lingüística en el Noroeste, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Mexico, November 2004.Google Scholar

de Reuse, W. J. ‘Tonto Apache and its position within Apachean’ in Holton, G. (ed.), Proceedings of the 2002 Athabaskan Languages Conference = Alaska Native Language Center Working Papers, 2 (Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska, 2002), 78–90.Google Scholar

de Reuse, W. J. ‘Yuman phonetic or phonological influences on Apachean’, paper presented at the XI Encuentro Internacional de Lingüística en el Noroeste, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo, Mexico, November 19, 2010.Google Scholar

de Reuse, W. J., with Goode, P.. A practical grammar of the San Carlos Apache language = LINCOM Studies in Native American Linguistics, 51 (Munich: LINCOM, 2006).Google Scholar

Derolez, R. (ed.). Anglo-Saxon Glossography: Papers Read at the International Conference Held in the Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren, en Schone Kunsten van België, Brussels, 8 and 9 September 1986 (Brussels: Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren, en Schone Kunsten van België, 1992).Google Scholar

Dettori, A. ‘Sardisch: Grammatikographie und Lexikographie’ in Holtus, et al. (eds.), Lexikon der romanistischen Linguistik, IV.913–35.Google Scholar

Deufert, M. Textgeschichte und Rezeption der plautinischen Komödien im Altertum (Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 2002).Google Scholar

Die deutsche Literatur des Mittelalters: Verfasserlexikon, 2nd edn, ed. Ruh, Kurt et al., 14 vols. (Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 1978–2008).Google Scholar

DeVotta, N. ‘Ethnolinguistic nationalism and ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka’ in Brown, M. E. and Ganguli, Š. (eds.), Fighting Words: Language Policy and Ethnic Relations in Asia (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002), 105–39.Google Scholar

Dhadphale, M. G. Synonymic Collocations in the Tipiṭaka: A Study (Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 1980).Google Scholar

Dickey, E. Ancient Greek Scholarship: A Guide to Finding, Reading, and Understanding Scholia, Commentaries, Lexica, and Grammatical Treatises, from their Beginnings to the Byzantine Period (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Dickey, E. ‘Columnar translation: an ancient interpretive tool that the Romans gave the Greeks’, Classical Quarterly, 65 (2015), 807–21.Google Scholar

Dickey, E. ‘The creation of Latin teaching materials in antiquity: a re-interpretation of P. Sorb. inv. 2069’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 175 (2010), 188–208.Google Scholar

Dietrich, W. ‘Die Lexikographie des Tupi-Guaraní’, in Hausmann, et al. (eds.), Wörterbücher, III.2670–6.Google Scholar

Dietrich, W. ‘O conceito de “Língua Geral” à luz dos dicionários de língua geral existentes’, Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada (DELTA), 30 (2014), 591–622.Google Scholar

Dillery, J. ‘Literary interaction between Greece and Egypt: Manetho and synchronism’ in Rutherford, (ed.), Greco-Egyptian Interactions, 107–38.Google Scholar

Di Marco, A. ‘Per un riesame della tradizione umanistica di Festo’, Res publica litterarum, 38 (2015), 35–61.Google Scholar

Dionisotti, A. C. ‘From Ausonius’ schooldays? A schoolbook and its relatives’, Journal of Roman Studies, 72 (1982), 83–125.Google Scholar

Dionisotti, A. C. ‘Greek grammars and dictionaries in Carolingian Europe’ in Herren, M. W. with Brown, S. A. (eds.), The Sacred Nectar of the Greeks: The Study of Greek in the West in the Early Middle Ages (London: King’s College, 1988), 1–56.Google Scholar

Dionisotti, A. C. ‘On the Greek studies of Robert Grosseteste’ in Dionisotti, A. C., Grafton, A., and Kraye, J. (eds.), The Uses of Greek and Latin: Historical Essays (London: Warburg Institute, 1988), 19–39.Google Scholar

Dionisotti, A. C. ‘On the nature and transmission of Latin glossaries’, in Hamesse (ed.), Les manuscrits des lexiques et glossaires, 205–52;reprint Ashgate Critical Essays I.13–60.Google Scholar

Dirks, N. B. Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India (Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. Australian Languages: Their Nature and Development (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. The Languages of Australia (Cambridge University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani, ed. Ghisalberti, A. M. et al., 100 vols. projected (Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia italiana, 1960–), www.treccani.it/biografico/.Google Scholar

Doi, T. The Study of Language in Japan: A Historical Survey (Tokyo: Shinozaki shorin, 1976).Google Scholar

Doke, C. M. ‘Bantu language pioneers of the nineteenth century’, African Studies, 18 (1959), 1–27.Google Scholar

Doke, C. M. Bantu: Modern Grammatical, Phonetical, and Lexicographical Studies Since 1860 (London: International African Institute, 1945).Google Scholar

Doke, C. M. ‘Early Bantu literature: the age of Brusciotto’, Bantu Studies, 9 (1935), 87–114.Google Scholar

Dollinger, S., and von Schneidemesser, L.. ‘Canadianism, Americanism, North Americanism? A comparison of DARE and DCHP’, American Speech, 86 (2011), 115–51.Google Scholar

Donadoni, S. ‘Gli Egiziani e le lingue degli altri’, Vicino Oriente, 3 (1980), 1–14.Google Scholar

Dormels, R. ‘Hunmin-chŏngum and the transcription of Chinese pronunciation in the King Sejong Era’, in Fedotoff, A. and Karteva-Dancheva, S. (eds.), Outlining the Korean Society (proceedings volume, International Jubilee Conference on Korean Studies Dedicated to the 20th Anniversary of the Korean Studies Program) (Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski, 2015), 17–29.Google Scholar

Dotan, A. Nitsanim rishonim bǝ-ḥoxmat ha-millim: min ha-masora el rešit ha-milonaᵓut ha-ᶜivrit (Jerusalem: Academy of Hebrew Language, 2005).Google Scholar

Douglas, W. H. ‘Alphabetising Bardi’ in McGregor, (ed.), Studies in Kimberley Languages, 189–204.Google Scholar

Drachmann, A. B. Die Überlieferung des Cyrillglossars (Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard, 1935).Google Scholar

Drimba, V. Codex Comanicus. Édition diplomatique avec fac-similés (Bucharest: Editura Enciclopedică, 2000).Google Scholar

Duncan, J. B. ‘Examinations and orthodoxy in Chosŏn Dynasty Korea’ in Elman, B. A., Duncan, J. B., and Ooms, H. (eds.), Rethinking Confucianism: Past and Present in China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam (Los Angeles: UCLA Asian Pacific Monograph Series, 2002), 65–94.Google Scholar

Duro, A. ‘La lexicographie italienne du XXe siècle’ in Hausmann, et al. (eds.), Wörterbücher, II.1863–78.Google Scholar

Duval, M. ‘Korean lexicography’, in Gouws, et al. (eds.), Dictionaries: Supplementary Volume, 900–10.Google Scholar

Dwyer, R. Gujarati: A Complete Course for Beginners (Lincolnwood, IL: NTC, 1995).Google Scholar

Dykstra, A. ‘Lexicography of Modern West Frisian’ in Munske, (ed.), Handbook of Frisian Studies, 148–55.Google Scholar

Echols, J. M. ‘Presidential address: dictionaries and dictionary making, Malay and Indonesian’, Journal of Asian Studies, 38.1 (1978), 11–24.Google Scholar

Edel, E. Die ägyptisch-hethitische Korrespondenz aus Boghazköi in babylonischer und hethitischer Sprache, 2 vols. (Opladen: Westdeutscher, 1994).Google Scholar

Edzard, L. ‘Die SIG₇.ALAN = Nabnītu-Liste und das Konzept der semitischen Wurzel’, Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 161 (2011), 17–37.Google Scholar

Eickmans, H. ‘Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal (WNT)’ in Haß, (ed.), Große Lexika, 271–91.Google Scholar

Ellis, F. W. ‘Note to the Introduction’, in Campbell, A. D., A Grammar of the Teloogoo Language (Chennai: College, 1816), 1–31.Google Scholar

Encyclopædia Iranica, ed. Yarshater, E., 15 vols. and 2 fascicles to date, plus entries only available online (London etc.: [imprints vary], 1982–), www.iranicaonline.org.Google Scholar

Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics, ed. Giannakis, G. K. et al., 3 vols. (Leiden and Boston: Brill 2014), referenceworks.brillonline.com/browse/encyclopedia-of-ancient-greek-language-and-linguistics.Google Scholar

Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics, ed. Versteegh, K. et al., 5 vols. (Leiden: Brill, 2006–9), referenceworks.brillonline.com/browse/encyclopedia-of-arabic-language-and-linguistics.Google Scholar

Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, ed. Khan, G., 4 vols. (Leiden: Brill, 2012–13).Google Scholar

Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edn, ed. Bearman, P. J. et al., 12 vols. plus supplementary vols. (Leiden: Brill, 1954–2006), referenceworks.brillonline.com/browse/encyclopaedia-of-islam-2.Google Scholar

Encyclopaedia of Islam 3, ed. Fleet, K. et al., in progress. (Leiden: Brill, 2007–), referenceworks.brillonline.com/browse/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3.Google Scholar

Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn, ed. Brown, K., 14 vols. (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006).Google Scholar

Encyclopaedia of the Middle Ages, ed. Vauchez, A., trans. A. Walford, 2002, www.oxfordreference.com.Google Scholar

English Dialect Society. Complete List of Publications 1873–1896 with Indexes (London: Trübner, 1896).Google Scholar

Englund, R. K. ‘Texts from the late Uruk period’ in Attinger, P. and Wäflern, M. (eds.), Mesopotamien: Späturuk-Zeit und Frühdynastische Zeit: Annäherungen 1 = Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis, 160/1 (Fribourg: Universitätsverlag, 1998), 15–233.Google Scholar

Erbse, H. Untersuchungen zu den attizistischen Lexika = Abhandlungen der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Phil.-hist. Klasse, for 1949, no. 2 (Berlin: Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1950).Google Scholar

Ernst, G. ‘Romanian’ in Gouws, et al. (eds.), Dictionaries: Supplementary Volume, 687–701.Google Scholar

Ersoy, A. ‘Şemseddin Sami: Turkish Lexicon’ in Ersoy, A., Górny, M. and Kehriotis, V. (eds.), Modernism: Representation of National Culture. Discourses of Collective Identity in Central and Southeast Europe 1770–1945. Texts and Commentaries, vol. III/2 (Budapest and New York: Central European University Press, 2010), 33–9.Google Scholar

Eschbach-Szabo, V. ‘La réflexion linguistique au Japon’ in Auroux, (ed.), Histoire des idées linguistiques, I.459–64.Google Scholar

Esposito, E. ‘Fragments of Greek lexicography in the papyri’, Trends in Classics, 1 (2009), 251–93.Google Scholar

Ethé, H. Catalogue of Persian Manuscripts in the Library of the India Office, 2 vols. (Oxford University Press, 1903).Google Scholar

Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 21st edn, ed. Simons, G. F. and Fennig, C. D. (Dallas: SIL International, 2018), www.ethnologue.com.Google Scholar

Evans, J. G. Report on Manuscripts in the Welsh Language, vol. I part 3, Peniarth (London: HMSO, 1905).Google Scholar

Eytan, E., et al. ‘Hebrew language: modern period’ in Skolnik, F. (ed.), Encyclopaedia Judaica (2007), VIII.671–80.Google Scholar

Ezquerra, M. A. ‘Spanisch: Lexikographie’ in Holtus, et al. (eds.), Lexikon der romanistischen Linguistik, VI.1.636–51.Google Scholar

Fabian, J. ‘The other revisited: critical afterthoughts’, Anthropological Theory, 6.2 (2006), 139–52.Google Scholar

Fang, C. The Asami Library: A Descriptive Catalog, ed. Huff, E. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Farber, W. ‘Neues aus Uruk: Zur “Bibliothek des Iqīša”’, Die Welt des Orients, 18 (January 1987), 26–42.Google Scholar

Farina, D. M. T. Cr. ‘Marrism and Soviet lexicography’ in Kachru, B. B. and Kahane, H. (eds.), Cultures, Ideologies, and the Dictionary: Studies in honor of Ladislav Zgusta (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995), 153–70.Google Scholar

Feder, F. ‘Coptic translations’ in Lange, A. and Tov, E. (eds.), Textual History of the Bible: The Hebrew Bible, vol. IA, Overview Articles (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2016), 331a–345b.Google Scholar

Feder, F. ‘Die koptische Übersetzung des Alten und Neuen Testamentes im 4. Jahrhundert’ in Tubach, J. and Vashalomidze, S. (eds.), Stabilisierung und Profilierung der koptischen Kirche im 4. Jahrhundert = Hallesche Beiträge zur Orientwissenschaft, 44 (Halle: Martin-Luther-Universität, 2007), 65–93.Google Scholar

Fellman, J. The Revival of a Classical Tongue: Eliezer Ben Yehuda and the Modern Hebrew Language (The Hague: Mouton, 1973).Google Scholar

Fenton, P.-B. ‘Saʿadyā ben Yōsēf’ in Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edn, VIII.661–2.Google Scholar

Ferg, A., (ed.). Western Apache Material Culture: The Goodwin and Guenther Collections (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Ferguson, C. A. ‘Diglossia’, Word, 15 (1959), 325–40.Google Scholar

Ferguson, D. W. ‘Robert Knox’s Sinhalese vocabulary’, Journal of the Ceylon Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 14 (1869), 155–200.Google Scholar

Fernández Rodríguez, R. ‘El Calepino ilocano (c. 1797) del P. Vivar: innovaciones lexicográficas y política traductora’ in Zwartjes, et al. (eds.), Missionary Linguistics IV, 249–72.Google Scholar

Fernández Rodríguez, R. ‘Lexicografía de la lengua ilocana: estudio de una obra manuscrita del siglo XVIII: el calepino ilocano’, unpublished PhD thesis, Universidad de Valladolid (2012).Google Scholar

Fernández Rodríguez, R. ‘Lexicography in the Philippines (1600–1800)’, Historiographia Linguistica, 41.1 (2014), 1–32.Google Scholar

Filipović, R. ‘The beginnings of lexicography in Croatia’ in Hartmann, (ed.), History of Lexicography, 65–73.Google Scholar

Filliozat, J. ‘Deux cents ans d’indianisme: critique des méthodes et des résultats’, Bulletin de l’Ecole française d’Extrême-Orient, 76.1 (1987), 83–116.Google Scholar

Findley, C.V. ‘Sir James W. Redhouse (1811–1892): the making of a perfect Orientalist?’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 99.4 (1979), 573–600.Google Scholar

Fishman, J. A., ‘The lexicography of Yiddish’ in Hausmann, et al. (eds.), Wörterbücher, II.2246–54.Google Scholar

Flajšhans, V. Klaret i jeho družina, 2 vols. (Prague: Nákladem České akademie věd a umění, 1926–8).Google Scholar

Fonkič, B. L. Grečeskie rukopisi evropejskich sobranij: paleografičeskie i kodikologičeskie issledovanija 1988–1998 gg./Manuscrits grecs dans les collections européennes: Études paléographiques et codicologiques 1988–1998 (Moscow: Indrik, 1999).Google Scholar

Fonseca, M. do C. ‘Fontes manuscritas e impressas da Central Library of Pangim: memória linguística de uma regiào Lusófona’, in Actas do 6°Colóquio anual da lusofonia, Bragança, Portugal 3–6 Outubro 2007 (Câmara Municipal de Bragança, 2007), 89–95, 231–4.Google Scholar

Fonseca, M. do C. Historiografia linguística portuguesa e missionária: preposições e posposições no séc. XVII (Lisbon: Colibri, 2006).Google Scholar

Fonseca, M. do C. ‘Historiographie linguistique portugaise: le processus de grammatisation des langues extra-européennes’ in Staudacher-Valliamee, G. (ed.), L’écriture et la construction des langues dans le sud-ouest de l’océan Indien (Saint-Denis: Université de la Réunion; Paris: L’Harmattan, 2007), 181–90.Google Scholar

Fortune, G. G. ‘75 years of writing in Shona’, Zambezia, 1 (1969), 55–68.Google Scholar

Fountain, C. ‘Transculturation, assimilation, and appropriation in the missionary presentation of Nahuatl’, in Zimmermann, K. and Kellermeier-Rehbein, B. (eds.), Colonialism and Missionary Linguistics (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2015), 177–97.Google Scholar

Fournet, J.-L. ‘The multilingual environment of Late Antique Egypt: Greek, Latin, Coptic, and Persian documentation’ in Bagnall, (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Papyrology, 418–51.Google Scholar

Frahm, E. Babylonian and Assyrian Text Commentaries: Origins of Interpretation = Guides to the Mesopotamian Textual Record, 5 (Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 2011)Google Scholar

Franzen, , Middle English = Ashgate Critical Essays, vol. II.Google Scholar

Franzen, , Old English = Ashgate Critical Essays, vol. I.Google Scholar

Frawley, W., Hill, K. C., and Munro, P. (eds.). Making Dictionaries: Preserving Indigenous Languages of the Americas (Berkeley, etc.: University of California Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Freidkin, U., and Freidkin, M.. ‘Rav-Milim, Hamilon hashalem: Milon ivri khadash’, Leshonenu Laam, 49 (1977), 3–25.Google Scholar

Fressura, M. Vergilius Latinograecus: corpus dei manoscritti bilingui dell’Eneide, parte prima (1–8) (Rome and Pisa: Fabrizio Serra, 2017).Google Scholar

Fumagalli, G. Bibliografia etiopica (Milan: Hoepli, 1893).Google Scholar

Furuya, Akihiro 古屋昭弘. ‘“Zhengzi tong” banben ji zuozhe kao’ 《正字通》版本及作者考, Zhongguo yuwen, 247.4 (1995), 306–11.Google Scholar

Gaeffke, P. ‘A rock in the tides of time: Oriental Studies then and now’, Academic Questions, 3.2 (1990), 67–74.Google Scholar

Galambos, I. Translating Chinese Tradition and Teaching Tangut Culture: Manuscripts and Printed Books from Khara-khoto (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2015).Google Scholar

A galáxia das línguas na época da expansao (Lisbon: Comissao nacional para as comemoraçoes dos descobrimentos portugueses, 1992).Google Scholar

Gandolfo, M. D. ‘Roman Slavdom’ in Lepschy, G. (ed.), History of Linguistics, vol. III,Renaissance and Early Modern Linguistics (London: Longman, 1998), 108–23.Google Scholar

Ganz, D. ‘The “Liber glossarum”: a Carolingian encyclopedia’, in Butzer, P. L. and Lohrmann, D. (eds.), Science in Western and Eastern Civilization in Carolingian Times (Basel: Birkhäuser, 1993), 127–35.Google Scholar

García-Medall, J. Vocabularios hispano-asiáticos: traducción y contacto intercultural = Monográficos de la revista Hermēneus, 11 (Soria: Vertere, 2009).Google Scholar

Gardiner, A. H. Egyptian Grammar, 3rd edn (Oxford: Griffith Institute, Ashmolean Museum, 1957).Google Scholar

Garrison, M. B. ‘Antiquarianism, copying, collecting’ in Potts, D. T. (ed.), A Companion to the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East, 2 vols. (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012), I.27–47.Google Scholar

Gaul, N. ‘Moschopulos, Lopadiotes, Phrankopulos (?), Magistros, Staphidakes: Prosopographisches und Methodologisches zur Lexikographie des frühen 14. Jahrhunderts’ in Trapp, E. and Schönauer, S. (eds.), Lexicologica Byzantina: Beiträge zum Kolloquium zur byzantinischen Lexikographie (Bonn, 13.–15. Juli 2007) (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2008), 163–96.Google Scholar

Gaul, N. Thomas Magistros und die spätbyzantische Sophistik: Studien zum Humanismus urbaner Eliten der frühen Palaiologenzeit (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2011).Google Scholar

Gaul, N. ‘The twitching shroud: Collective construction of paideia in the circle of Thomas Magistros’, Segno e testo, 5 (2007), 263–340.Google Scholar

Gauton, R. ‘Lexicography of the Nguni languages’ in Gouws, et al. (eds.), Dictionaries: Supplementary Volume, 912–29.Google Scholar

Geller, M. J., and Vacin, L. (eds.). Healing Magic and Evil Demons: Canonical Udug-Hul Incantations = Die babylonisch-assyrische Medizin in Texten und Untersuchungen, 8 (Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2015).Google Scholar

Geng, Zhensheng 耿振生. Ming Qing dengyunxue tonglun 明清等韵学通论 (Beijing: Yuwen chubanshe, 1992).Google Scholar

Gesche, P. D. Schulunterricht in Babylonien im ersten Jahrtausend v. Chr. = Alter Orient und Altes Testament, 275 (Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 2001).Google Scholar

Ghatage, A. M. ‘Traditional lexica and the Sanskrit Historical Dictionary’, in Ghatage, R. N. Dandekar, and M. A. Mehendale, (eds.), Studies in Historical Sanskrit Lexicography (Pune: Deccan College, 1973), 25–39.Google Scholar

Gilles, H. ‘Glosses, legal’ in Encyclopaedia of the Middle Ages.Google Scholar

Gilliver, P. The Making of the Oxford English Dictionary (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Glassner, J.-J. Writing in Sumer: The Invention of Cuneiform (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Glinert, L. (ed.). Hebrew in Ashkenaz: A Language in Exile (Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Glinert, L. ‘Leshitot hamilonaut bemilon Even-Shoshan: normativiyut vedeskriptiviyut’, Mekhkarim Belashon, 2–3 (1987), 399–409.Google Scholar

Glinert, L. ‘Modern Hebrew lexicography: the last hundred years’, Jewish Book Annual, 52 (1994), 37–58.Google Scholar

Gnanapragasam, V. M. ‘Contributions of Fr Beschi to Tamil’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Madras, 1965, shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/97704.Google Scholar

Goddard, C., and Thieberger, N.. ‘Lexicographic research on Australian Aboriginal languages 1968–1993’ in Tryon, D. and Walsh, M. (eds.), Boundary Rider: Essays in Honour of Geoffrey O’Grady (Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, 1997), 175–208.Google Scholar

Godfrey, J. J. ‘Sir William Jones and Père Coeurdoux: a philological footnote’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 87.1 (1967), 57–9.Google Scholar

Goetz, G. ‘Glossographie’, in Paulys Realencyclopädie, VII.1.1433–66.Google Scholar

Golden, P. B. ‘Codex Cumanicus’ in Paksoy, H. B. (ed.), Central Asian Monuments, vlib.iue.it/carrie/texts/carrie_books/paksoy-2/cam2.html.Google Scholar

Golden, P. B. ‘Rasulid Hexaglot’ in Encyclopædia Iranica.Google Scholar

Golla, V. California Indian Languages (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Gong, Y. Die Namen der Keilschriftzeichen = Alter Orient und Altes Testament, 268 (Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 2000).Google Scholar

Goodman, G. K. Japan and the Dutch 1600–1853 (Richmond, UK: Curzon, 2000).Google Scholar

Goodwin, G. The Social Organization of the Western Apache (University of Chicago Press, 1942; reprint 1969).Google Scholar

Goshen-Gottstein, M. ‘The lexicography of Hebrew’, Lexicographica, 7 (1991), 72–93.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, N. Kanji Politics: Language Policy and Japanese Script (London: Kegan Paul, 1995).Google Scholar

Gouws, R. H. ‘Aspects of Afrikaans lexicography’ in Gouws, et al. (eds.), Dictionaries: Supplementary Volume, 827–35.Google Scholar

Gouws, R. H., Heid, U., Schweickard, W., and Wiegand, H. E. (eds.). Dictionaries. An International Encyclopedia of Lexicography, Supplementary Volume: Recent Developments with Focus on Electronic and Computational Lexicography (Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2013).Google Scholar

Grafton, A. Joseph Scaliger: A Study in the History of Classical Scholarship, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983–93).Google Scholar

Gray, E. G. ‘Missionary linguistics and the description of “exotic languages”’ in Auroux, et al. (eds.), History of the Language Sciences, I.929–37.Google Scholar

Green, N. ‘The uses of books in a late Mughal takiyya: Persianate knowledge between person and paper’, Modern Asian Studies, 44.2 (2010), 241–65.Google Scholar

Greenbaum, A. ‘The status of Hebrew in Soviet Russia from the revolution to the Gorbachev thaw’ in Glinert, (ed.), Hebrew in Ashkenaz, 242–8.Google Scholar

Greenberg, M. ‘The Illyrian movement: a Croatian vision of South Slavic unity’, in Fishman, J. and García, O. (eds.), Handbook of Language and Ethnic Identity, 2 vols. (Oxford University Press, 2010–11), II.364–80.Google Scholar

Grønbech, K. Komanisches Wörterbuch: Türkischer Wortindex zu Codex Cumanicus (Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1942).Google Scholar

Grønvik, O. ‘The Saga of Norsk Ordbok: A scholarly dictionary for the Norwegian vernacular and the Nynorsk written language’, Kernerman Dictionary News, 25 (July 2017), 19–24.Google Scholar

Gros, F. ‘Review of A. Dhamotharan, Tamil Dictionaries: A Bibliography’, Bulletin de l’École française d’Extrême-Orient, 67 (1980), 346–58.Google Scholar

Gross, A., Kumaradoss, Y. V., and Liebau, H. (eds.). Halle and the Beginning of Protestant Christianity in India (Halle: Franckesche Stiftung, 2006).Google Scholar

Groß, C. ‘Les dictionnaires étymologiques et historiques des langues romanes’ in Klump, et al. (eds.), Manuel des langues romanes, 91–117.Google Scholar

Grossman, A. Ḥaxme Tsarfat ha-rishonim: qorotehem, darkam bǝ-hanhagat ha-tsibur, yǝtsiratam ha-ruḥanit (Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Grubmüller, K. Vocabularius ex quo: Untersuchungen zu lateinisch–deutschen Vokabularen des Spätmittelalters (Munich: Beck, 1967).Google Scholar

Grunhaus, N. The Challenge of Received Tradition: Dilemmas of Interpretation in Radak’s Biblical Commentaries (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Gruszczyński, W., and Saloni, Z.. ‘From multilingual to monolingual dictionaries: a historical overview of Polish lexicography’, Studies in Polish Linguistics, 8.4 (2013), 205–27.Google Scholar

‘Guinness World Records Announces Xinhua Dictionary as the “Most Popular Dictionary” and the “Best-Selling book (regularly updated)”’. 12 April 2016, www.guinnessworldrecords.com.Google Scholar

Gül, B. ‘İbni Mühenna Lügati’nin Türk ve Moğol dil araştırmalarındaki yeri ve önemi’, Türkbilig, 19 (2010), 87‒95.Google Scholar

Gundersen, D. ‘Norwegian lexicography’ in Hausmann, et al. (eds.), Wörterbücher, II.1923–8.Google Scholar

Gunn, E. Rewriting Chinese: Style and Innovation in Twentieth-Century Chinese Prose (Stanford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Ingólfsson, Gunnlaugur. ‘De første trykte islandske ordbøger’, Nordiske studier i leksikografi, 11 (2012), 309–17.Google Scholar

Guptan Nair, S. ‘Introduction to Portuguese Malayalam Dictionary’ in Pallath, (ed.), Arnos Padiri, 34–45.Google Scholar

Ġurāb, ʿ I. Ḥ. al-Maʿāǧim al-ʿArabiyya: Riḥla fī l-ǧuḏūr wa-l-taṭawwur wa-l-huwiyya (Dimyāṭ: Maktabat wa-Maṭbaʿat Nānsī, 2005).Google Scholar

Gurdon, P. R. T. ‘Review of Chandra-kanta abhidhan’, Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, University of London, 8.1 (1935), 235–7.Google Scholar

Gurney, O. R. ‘A list of copper objects’, Iraq, 31 (1969), 3–7.Google Scholar

Ha, Gang-Jin. ‘Pyojeeo daeyeog hanja-eoui tansaeng-gwa hanbuljajeon-ui gachi’, Cogito, 80 (2016), 107–43.Google Scholar

Haakh, N. M. ‘Adolf Hitlers “Mein Kampf” und seine arabischen Übersetzungen’, unpublished paper, Freie Universität Berlin, 2007, fu-berlin.academia.edu/NoraHaakh.Google Scholar

Häberlein, M., and Keese, A. (eds.). Sprachgrenzen, Sprachkontakte, Kulturelle Vermittler: Kommunikation zwischen Europäern und Aussereuropäern (16.–20. Jahrhundert) (Stuttgart: Steiner, 2010).Google Scholar

Haensch, G. ‘Katalanische Lexikographie’ in Hausmann, et al. (eds.), Wörterbücher, II.1770–88.Google Scholar

Haensch, G. ‘Spanische Lexikographie’ in Hausmann, et al. (eds.), Wörterbücher, II.1738–67.Google Scholar

Haensch, G., and Omeñaca, C.. Los diccionarios del español en siglo XXI (Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad, 1997).Google Scholar

Hagemann, E. R. ‘Surgeon Smart and the Indians: an 1866 Apache word-list’, Journal of Arizona History, 11.2 (1970), 126–40.Google Scholar

Hakala, W. N. ‘Ajay čand nāma’ in Ernst, C. W. and Speziale, F. (eds.), Perso-Indica: The Sultanate Period and the Early Mughal Empire (Until 1556) (Leiden: Brill, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Hakala, W. N. ‘The authorial problem in the Ḵẖāliq bārī of “Ḵẖusrau”’, Indian Economic & Social History Review, 51.4 (2014), 481–96.Google Scholar

Hakala, W. N. Negotiating Languages: Urdu, Hindi, and the Definition of Modern South Asia (New York: Columbia University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Hakala, W. N. ‘Qaṣīda dar luġāt-i hindī’ in Ernst, C. W. and Speziale, F. (eds.), Perso-Indica: The Sultanate Period and the Early Mughal Empire (Until 1556) (Leiden: Brill, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Ḥālī, Ā. Ḥ. Yādgār-i Ghālib (Kanpur: Nami Press, 1897).Google Scholar

Hall, C. Macaulay and Son: Architects of Imperial Britain (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Hamann, B. E. The Translations of Nebrija: Language, Culture, and Circulation in the Early Modern World (Amherst and Boston: University of Massachusetts Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Hamesse, J. (ed.). Les manuscrits des lexiques et glossaires de l’antiquité tardive à la fin du moyen âge (Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération Internationale des Instituts d’Études Médiévales, 1996).Google Scholar

Hamilton, A. The Copts and the West, 1439–1822: The European Discovery of the Egyptian Church (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Han, Yong-un. ‘Features and procedures of a unified and unabridged Korean dictionary, Gyeoremal Keunsajeon’, Lexicography: Journal of ASIALEX, 3 (2016), 5–18.Google Scholar

Handschriftencensus: Eine Bestandsaufnahme der handschriftlichen Überlieferung deutschsprachiger Texte des Mittelalters, www.handschriftencensus.de.Google Scholar

Hanka, V. Sbírka nejdávnějších slovniků (Prague: n.p., 1833).Google Scholar

Hanks, P. ‘Definitions and explanations’ in Sinclair, (ed.), Looking Up, 113–36.Google Scholar

Hanks, P., and de Schryver, G.-M. (eds.). International Handbook of Modern Lexis and Lexicography (Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, print edition forthcoming, some chapters published online, 2015–).Google Scholar

Hanzeli, V. E. Missionary Linguistics in New France: A Study of Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Descriptions of American Indian Languages = Janua Linguarum, series maior, 29 (The Hague: Mouton, 1969).Google Scholar

Harbsmeier, C. Language and Logic = Needham, J. et al. (eds.), Science and Civilisation in China, vol. VII.1 (Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Hardman-de-Bautista, M. ‘Aymara lexicography’ in Hausmann, et al. (eds.), Wörterbücher, III.2684–90.Google Scholar

Harlfinger, D. (ed.). Griechische Handschriften und Aldinen: eine Ausstellung anläßlich der XV. Tagung der Mommsen-Gesellschaft in der Herzog August Bibliothek Wolfenbüttel (Wolfenbüttel: Herzog August Bibliothek, 1978).Google Scholar

Harshav, B. Language in Time of Revolution (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Hartmann, R. R. K. (ed.). The History of Lexicography (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins, 1986).Google Scholar

Hartmann, R. R. K., and James, G.. Dictionary of Lexicography (London and New York: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar

Hary, B., and Ángeles-Gallego, M.. ‘Lexicography and dialectology in Spanish Maqre Dardeqe’, in Ben-Shammai, H. and Hary, B. (eds.), Esoteric and Exoteric Aspects in Judeo-Arabic Culture (Leiden: Brill, 2006), 227–56.Google Scholar

Hasitzka, M. Neue Texte und Dokumentation zum Koptischunterricht = Mitteilungen aus der Papyrussammlung der Österreichischen Nationalbibliothek, 18 (Vienna: Hollinek, 1990).Google Scholar

Haslam, M. J. ‘The Homer lexicon of Apollonius Sophista, I: composition and constituents’, Classical Philology, 89 (1994), 1–45.Google Scholar

Haß, U. ‘Daniel Sanders: Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache (1859–1865)’ in Haß, (ed.), Große Lexika, 253–69.Google Scholar

Haß, U. (ed.). Große Lexika und Wörterbücher Europas: Europäische Enzyklopädien und Wörterbücher in historischen Porträts (Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2012).Google Scholar

Haß, U. ‘In search of the European dimension of lexicography’, unpublished lecture, Fifth International Conference for Historical Lexicography and Lexicology, Oxford, June 2010, www.linse.uni-due.de/linse/tagungen/Hass_European-dimension-of-lexicography_SHORT_FINAL-VERSION_fer_LINSE.pdf.Google Scholar

Hassanein, A. T. ‘Lexicography: monolingual dictionaries’ in Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics, III.37–45.Google Scholar

Haßler, G. ‘Las partículas entre la gramática y la lexicografía’ in Bierbach, M., von Gemmingen, B., and Stork, Y. (eds.), Das gefesselte Wort: Beiträge zur Entwicklung von Wörterbücher und Grammatiken des Spanischen/La palabra atada: Contribuciones sobre la evolución de diccionarios y gramáticas del español (Bonn: Romanistischer, 2007), 86–101.Google Scholar

Haß-Zumkehr, U. ‘“Alle welt erwartet hier eine erklärung von mir”: Jacob Grimms Vorrede zum Deutschen Wörterbuch zwischen Apologie und Programm’, Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 25 (1997), 1–23.Google Scholar

Haß-Zumkehr, U. Deutsche Wörterbücher: Brennpunkt von Sprach- und Kulturgeschichte (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2001).Google Scholar

Haß-Zumkehr, U. ‘Propagandainstrument Wörterbuch: zur lexikografischen Methodik im Nationalsozialismus’ in Wiegand, H. E. (ed.), Wörterbücher in der Diskussion IV: Vorträge aus dem Heidelberger Lexikographischen Kolloquium (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 2000), 135–53.Google Scholar

Haugen, E. I. ‘Introduction’ in Haugen, E. L., A Bibliography of Scandinavian Dictionaries (White Plains, NY: Kraus, 1984), 1–61.Google Scholar

Hausmann, F. J. ‘Wörterbuch und Wahrheit: zur Rezeption des Wörterbuchs der deutschen Gegenwartssprache in der Bundesrepublik’ in Malige-Klappenbach, H., Das Wörterbuch der deutschen Gegenwartssprache (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1986), 175–192.Google Scholar

Hausmann, F. J., Reichmann, O., Wiegand, H. E., and Zgusta, L. (eds.). Wörterbücher/Dictionaries/Dictionnaires: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Lexicographie/An International Encyclopedia of Lexicography/Encyclopédie internationale de lexicographie, 3 vols. (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1989–91).Google Scholar

Haviland, J. B. ‘A last look at Cook’s Guugu Yimidhirr word list’, Oceania, 44.3 (1974), 216–32.Google Scholar

Haywood, J. A. Arabic Lexicography: Its History and Its Place in the General History of Lexicography, 2nd edn (Leiden: Brill, 1965).Google Scholar

Haywood, J. A. ‘Arabic lexicography’ in Hausmann, et al. (eds.), Wörterbücher, III.2438–48.Google Scholar

Haywood, J. A. ‘Bilingual lexicography with Arabic’ in Hausmann, et al. (eds.), Wörterbücher, III.3086–96.Google Scholar

Hazai, G. ‘Al-Kāshgharī’ in Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edn, IV.699–701.Google Scholar

Heestermans, H. ‘Niederländische Lexikographie und Lexikographie des Afrikaans’ in Hausmann, et al. (eds.), Wörterbücher, II.2010–22.Google Scholar

Heo, Jae-Young. ‘Gug-eosajeon pyeonchan jeongchaeg mich geu yeogsa’, Gug-eogyoyug Yeongu, 15 (2005), 57–83.Google Scholar

Heo, Jae-Young. ‘Gug-eosajeon pyeonchan yeongusa’, Journal of Korealex, 13 (2009), 286–312.Google Scholar

Hercus, L. ‘Looking at some details of Reuther’s work’ in Peterson, and Kenny, (eds.), German Ethnography in Australia, 115–35.Google Scholar

Hermanson, E. A. ‘Colenso’s first attempt at Bible translation in Zulu’, in Draper, J. A. (ed.), The Eye of the Storm: Bishop John William Colenso and the Crisis of Biblical Interpretation (London and New York: Clark, 2003), 5–28.Google Scholar

Hernández, E. ‘En torno al vocabulario hispano–maya conservado en la biblioteca John Carter Brown (Codex Indicus 8)’, Revista de lexicografía, 14 (2008), 111–22.Google Scholar

Hernández, E. ‘Indigenismos en el Vocabulario de la lengua Cakchiquel atribuido a fray Domingo de Vico, MS. BNF R. 7507’, Revista de filología española, 88.1 (2008), 67–88.Google Scholar

Hernández, E. Lexicografía hispano-amerindia 1550–1800: catálogo descriptivo de los vocabularios con las lenguas indígenas americanas (Madrid: Iberoamericana; Frankfurt am Main: Vervuert, 2018).Google Scholar

Hernández, E. ‘La marca de uso metafórico para el náhuatl: una innovación de la lexicografía hispano-amerindia’, Colonial Latin American Review, 24.3 (2015), 318–35.Google Scholar

Hernández, E. ‘Los vocabularios Hispano–Mayas del siglo XVI’ in Zwartjes, et al. (eds.), Missionary Linguistics IV, 129–49.Google Scholar

Hewson, J. ‘The study of the native languages of North America: the French tradition’ in Auroux, et al. (eds.), History of the Language Sciences, I.966–73.Google Scholar

Hida, Yoshifumi, Matsui, Shigekazu, and Sakaida, Toshinobu (eds.). Meiji-ki kokugo jisho taikei bekkan: Shoshi to kenkyū (Tokyo: Ōzorasha, 2003).Google Scholar

Hildebrand, P. Le martyr Georges de Geel et les débuts de la mission du Congo (1645–1652) (Antwerp: Archives des Capucins, 1940).Google Scholar

Hilgert, M. ‘Von “Listenwissenschaft” und “epistemischen Dingen”: Konzeptuelle Annäherungen an altorientalische Wissenspraktiken’, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 40 (2009), 277–309.Google Scholar

Hill, B. S. ‘Judeo-Slavic’ in Kahn, and Rubin, (eds.), Handbook of Jewish Languages, 599–617.Google Scholar

Hill, K. C. ‘On publishing the Hopi Dictionary’ in Frawley, et al. (eds.), Making Dictionaries, 299–311.Google Scholar

Hjorth, P. L. ‘Danish lexicography’ in Hausmann, et al. (eds.), Wörterbücher, II.1913–22.Google Scholar

Hodgson, M. G. S. The Venture of Islam: Conscience and History in a World Civilization, 3 vols. (University of Chicago Press, 1974).Google Scholar

Hoffmann, F. Ägypten: Kultur und Lebenswelt in griechisch-römischer Zeit: eine Darstellung nach den demotischen Quellen (Berlin: Akademieverlag, 2000).Google Scholar

Holm, L., and Jonsson, H., ‘Swedish lexicography’ in Hausmann, et al. (eds.), Wörterbücher, II.1933–43.Google Scholar

Holtus, G., Metzeltin, M., and Schmitt, C. (eds.). Lexikon der romanistischen Linguistik, 8 vols. in 12 parts (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1988–2005).Google Scholar

Hong, Kisoon. ‘Ppujjillo nohansajeon-e gwanhan ilgo’, Korean Journal of Russian Language and Literature, 23.3 (2011), 325–51.Google Scholar

Hoogland, J. C. ‘Lexical gaps in Arabic lexicography with evidence from Arabic dictionaries’ in Ditters, E. and Motzki, H. (eds.), Approaches to Arabic Linguistics, Presented to Kees Versteegh on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday (Leiden: Brill, 2007), 455–73.Google Scholar

Hoogland, J. C. ‘Lexicography: bilingual dictionaries’ in Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics, III.21–30.Google Scholar

Hruša, I. Die akkadische Synonymenliste malku = šarru: Eine Textedition mit Übersetzung und Kommentar = Alter Orient und Altes Testament, 50 (Münster: Ugarit-Verlag, 2010).Google Scholar

Huang, Fushan 黃復山. Wang Anshi ‘Zishuo’ zhi yanjiu 王安石《字說》之研究 (Taipei: Hua Mulan wenhua chubanshe, 2008).Google Scholar

Hucker, C. O. A Dictionary of Official Titles in Imperial China (Stanford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Huigen, S. ‘Introduction’ in Huigen, et al. (eds.), The Dutch Trading Companies as Knowledge Networks, 1–17.Google Scholar

Huigen, S., de Jong, J. L, and Kolfin, E. (eds.). The Dutch Trading Companies as Knowledge Networks (Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2010).Google Scholar

Hüllen, Werner. English Dictionaries, 800–1700: The Topical Tradition, revised edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Hunger, H. Die hochsprachliche profane Literatur der Byzantiner, vol. II, Philologie, Profandichtung, Musik, Mathematik und Astronomie, Naturwissenschaften, Medizin, Kriegswissenschaft, Rechtsliteratur (Munich: Beck, 1978).Google Scholar

Hunt, T. Teaching and Learning Latin in Thirteenth-Century England, 3 vols. (Cambridge: Brewer, 1991).Google Scholar

Ibrahim, Z. ‘Lexical variation: Modern Standard Arabic’ in Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics, III.13–21.Google Scholar

Idema, W. L. Chinese Vernacular Fiction: The Formative Period (Leiden: Brill, 1974).Google Scholar

Iima, Hiroaki. Kokugo jiten no yukue (Tokyo: NHK shuppan, 2017).Google Scholar

Illing, K. ‘Abstractum-Glossar’ in Die deutsche Literatur des Mittelalters: Verfasserlexikon, s.v.Google Scholar

Iṉṉāci, Cū. Caturakarāti Ārāycci (‘Studies in Caturakarāti’) (Madurai: Madurai Kāmarācar Palkalaik Kaḻakam, n.d., but 1976 or later).Google Scholar

Irākavaiyaṅkār, Mu. Ārāyccit Tokuti, facs. reprint (Tanjore: Tamil University, 1984; ¹1938).Google Scholar

Iszchanian, R. Książka ormiańska w latach 1512–1920 (Kraków: Ossolineum, 1994).Google Scholar

Jackson, K. Language and History in Early Britain (Edinburgh University Press, 1953).Google Scholar

Jacques, R. Portuguese Pioneers of Vietnamese Linguistics Prior to 1650, trans. R. F. Uson and M. Uson (Bangkok: Orchid Press, 2002).Google Scholar

James, G. ‘Aspects of the structure of entries in the earliest missionary dictionary of Tamil’ in Zwartjes, et al. (eds.), Missionary Linguistics IV, 273–301.Google Scholar

James, G. Col-poruḷ: A History of Tamil Dictionaries (Chennai: Cre-A, 2000).Google Scholar

James, G. ‘The manuscript and printed versions of Antão de Proença’s Vocabulario tamulico (1679)’, academia.edu/10107360.Google Scholar