Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T16:57:48.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Compulsory Land Acquisition in Developing Countries: Shifting Paradigm or Entrenched Legacy?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

Iljoong Kim
Affiliation:
Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul
Hojun Lee
Affiliation:
Korea Development Institute
Ilya Somin
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Eminent Domain
A Comparative Perspective
, pp. 118 - 155
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adeniyi, P. 2011. Improving Land Sector Governance in Nigeria: Implementation of the Land Governance Assessment Framework [Draft]. World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Azuela, A. 2009. “Taking Land around the World: International Trends in the Expropriation for Urban and Infrastructure Projects.” In Lall, S., Freire, M., Yuen, B., Rajack, R. and Helluin, J. (eds), Urban Land Markets: Improving Land Management for Successful Urbanization. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balasubramanian, V., 2011. Chairman’s Report: Greed and Connivance. Task Force for Recovery and Protection of Government Lands, Bangalore.Google Scholar
Burnod, P. 2012. Between the Legal and the Legitimate: Status of Land Governance in Madagascar. Key Findings of the Land Governance Assessment Framework. World Bank.Google Scholar
Cai, H., Henderson, J. V. and Zhang, Q.. 2013. “China’s Land Market Auctions: Evidence of Corruption?RAND Journal of Economics, 44(3), 488521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, D. M., and Ross, J. K.. 2010. “Do Restrictions on Eminent Domain Harm Economic Development?Economic Development Quarterly, 24(4), 337–51.Google Scholar
Cernea, M. and Mathur, H. M. 2007. Can Compensation Prevent Impoverishment? Reforming Resettlement through Investments and Benefit-Sharing. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deininger, K., et. al. 2011. The Land Governance Assessment Framework: Identifying and Monitoring Good Practice in the Land Sector World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Downing, C. 2013. “Eminent Domain in 21st Century India: What New Delhi Can Learn from New London.” New York University International Law and Politics, 46, 207–89.Google Scholar
Du, J. and Peiser, R. B.. 2014. “Land Supply, Pricing and Local Governments’ Land Hoarding in China.” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 48, 180–89.Google Scholar
Ghatak, M. and Ghosh, P.. 2011. “The Land Acquisition Bill: A Critique and a Proposal.” Economic and Political Weekly, 46(41), 6572.Google Scholar
Ghatak, M., Mitra, S., Mookherjee, D. and Nath, A.. 2013. Land Acquisition and Compensation in Singur: What Really Happened? London School of Economics, mimio.Google Scholar
Government of India. 2013. Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Government Printer, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Government of India. 2014. Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Ordinance, 2014. Government Printer, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Government of Rwanda. 2007. Law on Expropriation. Kigali.Google Scholar
Government of Turkey. 1983. Expropriation Law. Government of Turkey, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Government of Vietnam. 2013. Land Law. Government of Vietnam, Hanoi.Google Scholar
Grossman, Z., Pincus, J. and Shapiro, P.. 2010. A Second-Best Mechanism for Land Assembly. Economics Working Paper Series. Department of Economics, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Hudson, D. Z. 2010. “Eminent Domain Due Process.” Yale Law Journal, 119(6), 12801327.Google Scholar
Jere, P. 2013. “Issues and Options for Improved Land Sector Governance in Malawi: Results of the Application of the Land Governance Assessment Framework.” World Bank, Washington DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasanga, K. and Mahama, S. 2011. Diagnostic Review of Land Ownership and Land Rights in the Accra Plains. Ghana Commercial Agriculture Project, Accra, Ghana.Google Scholar
Keith, S. et. al. 2009. Compulsory Acquisition of Land and Compensation. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Kelly, R. 2013. Making the Property Tax Work. International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series. International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Kerekes, C. B. and Williamson, C. R.. 2010. “Propertyless in Peru, Even with a Government Land Title.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 69(3), 1011–33.Google Scholar
Kim, A. 2011. “Land Takings in the Private Interest: Comparisons of Urban Land Development Controversies in the United States, China, and Vietnam.” Cityscape, 11(1).Google Scholar
Kitchens, C. 2014. “The Use of Eminent Domain in Land Assembly: The Case of the Tennessee Valley Authority.” Public Choice, 160(3–4), 455–66.Google Scholar
Lanza, S. P., Miceli, T. J., Sirmans, C. F. and Diop, M.. 2013. “The Use of Eminent Domain for Economic Development in the Era of Kelo.” Economic Development Quarterly, 27(4), 352–62.Google Scholar
Larbi, W. O., Antwi, Adarkwah and Olomolaiye, Paul. 2004. “Compulsory Land Acquisition in Ghana – Policy and Praxis.” Land Use Policy, 21(2), 115–27.Google Scholar
Lindsay, J. M. 2012. “Compulsory Acquisition of Land and Compensation in Infrastructure Projects.” PPP Insights, 1(3) World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Liu, S. and Li, Y.. 2015. “Land Institutional Change and China’s Economic Miracle: An Economic Interpretation.” Unpublished Paper, Harvard University, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Lopez, E. J. and Clark, J. R.. 2013. “The Problem with the Holdout Problem.” Review of Law and Economics, 9(2), 151–67.Google Scholar
Lozano-Gracia, N., Young, C., Lall, S. V. and Vishwanath, T.. 2013. Leveraging Land to Enable Urban Transformation: Lessons from Global Experience. Policy Research Working Paper Series: 6312, World Bank, Washington DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangioni, V. 2009. “The Evolution of the Public Purpose Rule in Compulsory Acquisition.” Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Miceli, T. J. 2014. The Cost of Kelo: Are Property Taxes a Form of Public Use? University of Connecticut, Storrs CT.Google Scholar
Miceli, T. J. and Segerson, K.. 2012. “Land Assembly and the Holdout Problem under Sequential Bargaining.” American Law and Economics Review, 14(2), 372–90.Google Scholar
Miceli, T. J. and Segerson, K.. 2014. Takings. Department of Economics Working Papers: 2014–17, University of Connecticut, Storrs CT.Google Scholar
Nosal, E. 2001. “The Taking of Land: Market Value Compensation Should Be Paid.” Journal of Public Economics, 82(3), 431–43.Google Scholar
Saginor, J. and McDonald, J. F.. 2009. “Eminent Domain: A Review of the Issues.” Journal of Real Estate Literature, 17(1), 343.Google Scholar
Shavell, S. 2010. “Eminent Domain Versus Government Purchase of Land Given Imperfect Information About Owners’ Valuations.” Journal of Law and Economics, 53(1), 127.Google Scholar
Stickler, M. M. 2012. “Governance of Large-Scale Land Acquisitions in Uganda: The Role of the Uganda Investment Authority.” International Conference on Global Land Grabbing II, Cornell University, New York.Google Scholar
Transparency International. 2011. Corruption in the Land Sector. Working Paper, Transparency International, Berlin.Google Scholar
Turnbull, G. K. 2012. “Delegating Eminent Domain Powers to Private Firms: Land Use and Efficiency Implications.” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 45(2), 305–25.Google Scholar
Turnbull, G. K. and Salvino, R. F.. 2009. “Do Broader Eminent Domain Powers Increase Government Size?Review of Law and Economics, 5(1), 785806.Google Scholar
US Supreme Court. 1954. Berman v. Parker. 348 US 26 (1954).Google Scholar
US Supreme Court. 2005. Kelo v. City of New London. 545 US 469 (2005).Google Scholar
Vo, D. H. 2011. Compulsory Land Acquisition and Voluntary Land Conversion in Vietnam: The Conceptual Approach, Land Valuation and Grievance Redress Mechanisms. World Bank, Hanoi.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2011. The Law and Practice of Expropriation in Albania: An Issues and Options Paper. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2012. Nepal Bridge Development Program: Environment and Social Systems Assessment (ESSA). World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2013a. Improving Land Sector Governance in Philippines: Implementation of the Land Governance Assessment Framework. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2013b. Improving Land Sector Governance in Vietnam: Draft Report. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2015. Urban Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement: Linking Innovation and Local Benefits. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
World Bank and Development Research Center. 2007. China: Integrating Land Policy Reforms Ii: Strengthening Land Rights for Equitable Growth and Social Harmony. World Bank, Beijing.Google Scholar
Zheng, H., Wang, X. and Cao, S.. 2014. “The Land Finance Model Jeopardizes China’s Sustainable Development.” Habitat International, 44(0), 130–36.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×