Bell, Abraham, 2009, “Private Takings,” University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 517–85.Google Scholar

Bell, Abraham and Parchomovsky, Gideon, 2007, “Takings Compensation Private,” Stanford Law Review, vol. 59, pp. 871–906.Google Scholar

Bell, Abraham and Parchomovsky, Gideon, 2010, “The Hidden Function of Takings Compensation,” Virginia Law Review, vol. 96, pp. 1673–1725.Google Scholar

Benson, Bruce and Brown, Matthew, 2010, “Eminent Domain for Private Use: Is It Justified by Market Failure or an Example of Government Failure,” in Benson, Bruce (ed.), Property Rights: Eminent Domain and Regulatory Takings Re-Examined, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Chang, Yun-Chen, 2013, Private Property and Takings Compensation: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Analysis, Northampton MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Cohen, Charles, 2006, “Eminent Domain After Kelo v. City of New London: An Argument for Banning Economic Development Takings,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 491–568.Google Scholar

Colwell, F. Peter and Sirmans, C. F., 1978, “Area, Time, Centrality and the Value of Urban Land,” Land Economics, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 514–19.Google Scholar

Epstein, A. Richard, 1985, Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, A. Richard, 2011, Design for Liberty: Private Property, Public Administration, and the Rule of Law, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fennell, Lee Anne, 2004, “Taking Eminent Domain Apart,” Michigan State Law Review, vol. 2004, pp. 957–1004.Google Scholar

Fennell, Lee Anne, 2013, “Just Enough,” Columbia Law Review, vol. 113, pp. 109–22.Google Scholar

Fischel, A. William, 1995, Regulatory Takings: Law, Economics, and Politics, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Food and Agriculture Organization, 2008, Compulsory Acquisition of Land and Compensation, Rome: United NationsGoogle Scholar

Gillette, P. Clayton, 2005, “Kelo and the Local Political Process” Hofstra Law Review, vol. 34, pp. 13–22.Google Scholar

Guntermann, L. Karl, Horestein, Alex R., Nardari, Federico, and Thomas, Garth, 2015, “Parcel Size and Land Value: A Comparison of Approaches,” Journal of Real Estate Research, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 281–319.Google Scholar

Heller, Michael and Hills, Rick, 2008, “Land Assembly Districts,” Harvard Law Review, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 1465–1527.Google Scholar

Householder, A. Benjamin, 2007, “Kelo Compensation: The Future of Economic Development Takings,” Chicago-Kent Law Review, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 1029–61.Google Scholar

Kelly, B. Daniel, 2006, “The Public Use Requirement in Eminent Domain Law: A Rational Based on Secret Purchase and Private Influence,” Cornell Law Review, vol. 92, pp. 1–66.Google Scholar

Kim, Iljoong and Park, Sungkyu, 2010, “Eminent Domain Power and Afterwards: Leviathan’s Post-Taking Opportunism,” Public Choice, vol. 143, pp. 209–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, Iljoong and Park, Sungkyu, 2014, “Are Private Takings Efficient?: An Empirical Investigation,” Department of Economics Working paper, Sungkyunkwan University.Google Scholar

Kochan, J. Donald, 1998, “Public Use and Independent Judiciary: Condemnation in an Interest-group Perspective,” Texas Review Law and Politics, vol. 3, pp. 49–116.Google Scholar

Kowal, Tim, 2006, “The Restitutionary Approach to Just Compensation,” Chapman Law Review, vol. 9, pp. 463–92.Google Scholar

Krier, James and Serkin, Christopher, 2004, “Public Ruses,” Michigan State Law Review, vol. 2004, pp. 859–75.Google Scholar

Lee, Brian, 2013, Just Under-compensation: The Idiosyncratic Premium in Eminent Domain, Legal Studies Research Paper no. 339, New York: Brooklyn Law SchoolGoogle Scholar

Lee, Hojun, 2015, “Public Interest Criteria and Korea’s Scrutiny System,” Paper presented at the International Conference on Shifting the Paradigm for Sustainable Development: Eminent Domain and Property Rights, Korea Development Institute.Google Scholar

Lehavi, Ammon, and Licht, Amir N., 2007, “Eminent Domain Inc.,” Columbia Law Review, vol. 107, pp. 1704–48.Google Scholar

Merrill, Thomas, 1986, “Rent Seeking and the Compensation Principle,” Northwestern University Law Review, vol. 80, pp. 1561–90.Google Scholar

Miceli, J. Thomas, 2011, The Economics Theory of Eminent Domain: Private Property, Public Use, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Miceli, J. Thomas, and Segerson, Kathleen, 2000, “Takings,” Bouckaert, Boudewijn and de Geest, Gerrit (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Nosal, Ed, 2001, “The Taking of Land: Market Value Compensation Should Be Paid,” Journal of Public Economy, vol. 82, pp. 431–43.Google Scholar

Serkin, Christopher, 2007, “Local Property Law: Adjusting the Scale of Property Protection,” Columbia Law Review, vol. 107, no.4, pp. 883–948.Google Scholar

Shavell, Steven, 2010, “Eminent Domain versus Government Purchase of Land Given Imperfect Information about Owners,” Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 53, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar

Somin, Ilya, 2007, “Controlling the Grasping Hand: Economic Development Takings after Kelo,” Supreme Court Economic Review, vol. 15, pp. 183–271.Google Scholar

Somin, Ilya, 2008, “The Politics of Economic Development Takings,” Case Western Reserve Law Review, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1185–98.Google Scholar

Thorsnes, Paul and Daniel, P. McMillen, 1998, “Land Value and Parcel Size: A Semi-parametric Analysis,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 233–44.Google Scholar

Williams, C. Matthew, 2009, “Restitution, Eminent Domain, and Economic Development: Moving to a Gains-Based Conception of the Takings Clause,” The Urban Lawyer, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 183–216.Google Scholar

Wyman, Katrina, 2007, “The Measure of Just Compensation,” University of California Davis Law Review, vol. 41, pp. 239–88.Google Scholar