Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T23:57:27.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 - Intergenerational Family Relationships and Successful Aging

from Part II - Psychosocial Factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2019

Rocío Fernández-Ballesteros
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Athanase Benetos
Affiliation:
Université de Lorraine and Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM) Nancy
Jean-Marie Robine
Affiliation:
INSERM
Get access

Summary

The present chapter will contribute to the body of research on associations between socio-economic resources, health and economic status, family intergenerational relations and between involvement with life and subjective well-being. It was achieved by analyzing data on these two dimensions of successful aging among European countries and Israel (based on SHARE data). The countries differ in their cultural and social contexts, particularly, family traditions and welfare development. As a substantial number of studies on the topic were conducted within one culture, it is imperative to continue and study these associations further in a wider comparative perspective. A most significant finding was the strong association between intergenerational family relations (including all its components) and successful aging (the two dimensions), even after controlling for background resources, including health and functioning, economic attributes and other variables. This means that predicting the decline of family relations was not proven in our research.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achdut, L., Tur-Sinai, A., Troitsky, R. (2015). Transitions among states of labor force participation in old age. European Journal of Ageing, 12(1), 3949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonova, L., Aranda, L., Havari, E., et al. (2015). Is there a European land of opportunity? Cross-country differences in inter-generational mobility in 14 European countries and Israel. In Börsch-Supan, A., et al. (Eds.), Ageing in Europe: Supporting Policies for an Inclusive Society. Berlin: De Gruyter, 209–22.Google Scholar
Attias-Donfut, C., Ogg, J., Wolff, F. C. (2005). European patterns of intergenerational financial and time transfers. European Journal of Ageing, 2(3), 161–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bengtson, V. L. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(1), 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtson, V. L., Lowenstein, A. (Eds.) (2003). Global Aging and Challenges to Families. New York and Berlin: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bengtson, V., Giarrusso, R., Mabry, J. B., et al. (2002). Solidarity, conflict, and ambivalence: Complementary or competing perspectives on intergenerational relationships? Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(3), 568–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtson, V. L., Acock, A. C., Allen, K. R., et al. (Eds.), Sourcebook on Family Theory and Research (pp. 393407). Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Biggs, S., Lowenstein, A. (2011). Generational Intelligence: A Critical Approach to Age Relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Börsch-Supan, A., Brandt, M., Hunkler, C., et al. (2013). Data resource profile: The survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (SHARE). International Journal of Epidemiology, 110.Google ScholarPubMed
Bulanda, J. R., Jendrek, M. P. (2016). Grandparenting roles and volunteer activity. Journal of Gerontology; Social Sciences, 71(1), 129–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, J., Martin, P., Poon, L. W., and Georgia Centenarian Study. (2015). Successful aging and subjective well-being among oldest-old adults. The Gerontologist, 55(1), 132–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daatland, S. O., Lowenstein, A. (2005). Intergenerational solidarity and the family–welfare state balance. European Journal of Ageing, 2(3), 174–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davey, B., Levin, E., Iliffe, S., et al. (2005). Integrating health and social care: implications for joint working and community care outcomes for older people. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(1), 2234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E. (1999). 11 Personality and Subjective Well-Being. Well-being: Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, 213.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (2013). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Fagerström, C., Borg, C., Balducci, C., et al. (2007). Life satisfaction and associated factors among people aged 60 years and above in six European countries. Applied Research in Quality of life, 2(1), 3350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenger, M. (2007). Welfare regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: Incorporating post-communist countries in a welfare regime typology. Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences, 3(2), 130.Google Scholar
Fernández-Ballesteros, R. (2013). Possibilities and limitations of age. Promoting Conscious and Active Learning and Aging, 2574.Google Scholar
Fernández-Ballesteros, R., Garcıá, L. F., Abarca, A., et al. (2008). Lay concept of ageing well: Cross-cultural comparisons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56, 950–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferring, D., Balducci, C., Burholt, V., et al. (2004). Life satisfaction of older people in six European countries: findings from the European study on adult well-being. European Journal of Ageing, 1(1), 1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freund, A. M., Baltes, P. B. (1998). Selection, optimization, and compensation as strategies of life management: correlations with subjective indicators of successful aging. Psychology and Aging, 13(4), 531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hank, K. (2011). How “successful” do older europeans age? findings from share. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 66B(2), 230–6.Google Scholar
Holstein, M. B., Minkler, M. (2003). Self, society, and the “new gerontology.” The Gerontologist, 43(6), 787–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hung, L. W., Kempen, G. I. J. M., De Vries, N. K. (2010). Cross-cultural comparison between academic and lay views of healthy ageing: A literature review. Ageing and Society, 30(8), 1373–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeste, D. V., Savla, G. N., Thompson, W. K. et al. (2013). Association between older age and more successful aging: critical role of resilience and depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170(2), 188–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Successful aging in Johnson County: Transportation report (2006). The Johnson County Consortium on Successful Aging (135).Google Scholar
Katz, R. (2009a). Intergenerational family relations and subjective well-being in old age: a cross-national study. European Journal of Ageing, 6, 7990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, R. (2009b). Intergenerational family relations and life satisfaction among three elderly population groups in transition in the Israeli multi-cultural society. Journal of Cross Cultural Gerontology, 24, 7791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, R., Lowenstein, A. (1999). Adjustment of older Soviet immigrants and their adult children residing in shared households: An intergenerational comparison. Journal of Family Relations, 48, 4350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, R., Lowenstein, A. (2003). Elders' quality of life and intergenerational relations: A cross-national comparison. Hallym International Journal on Aging, 5(2), 131–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, R., Lowenstein, A., Phillips, J. et al. (2005). Theorizing intergenerational solidarity, conflict and ambivalence in a comparative cross-national perspective. In Katz, R., Lowenstein, A., Halperin, D., et al. (2015). Generational Solidarity in Europe and Israel. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue canadienne du vieillissement. Special Section on Aging Families in International Context, 34(3), 342–55.Google Scholar
Keating, N., Kwan, D., Hillcoat-Nalletamby, S., et al. (2015). Evidence Review of Intergenerational Relationships: Experiences and Attitudes in the New Millennium. Centre for Innovative Ageing, Swansea University. Foresight, Government Office for Science.Google Scholar
Kunzmann, U., Little, T. D., Smith, J. (2000). Is age-related stability of subjective well-being a paradox? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from the Berlin Aging Study. Psychology and Aging, 15(3), 511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lagiewka, K., Antunes, J. P. (2011). European innovation partnership on active and healthy ageing–how is the EU connecting the dots between smart innovation and ageing boom. Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, 1(2), 95103.Google Scholar
Lavee, Y., Katz, R. (2003). The family in Israel: Between tradition and modernity. Marriage & Family Review, 34(1–2), 193217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, H. J., Lyu, J., Lee, C. M., et al. (2014). Intergenerational financial exchange and the psychological well-being of older adults in the Republic of Korea. Aging & Mental Health, 18(1), 3039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowenstein, A. (2005). Global aging and the challenges to families. In Johnson, M., Bengtson, V. L., Coleman, P. G. & Kirkwood, T. (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook on Age and Aging. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 403–13.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, A., Katz, R. (2005). Living arrangements, family solidarity and life satisfaction of two generations of immigrants. Ageing and Society, 25, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenstein, A., Katz, R. (2010). Family and age in global perspectives. In Phillipson, C. & Dannefer, D. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Gerontology. London: Sage Publications, pp. 190201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenstein, A., Katz, R., Gur-Yaish, N. (2007). Reciprocity in parent-child exchange and life satisfaction among the elderly in cross-national perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 63(4), 865–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, S. J., Connell, C. M., Heeringa, S. G., et al. (2010). Successful aging in the United States: Prevalence estimates from a national sample of older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 65B, 216–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Mahne, K., Huxhold, O. (2015). Grandparenthood and subjective well-being: Moderating effects of educational level. Journal of Gerontology; Social Sciences, 70(5), 782–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niedzwiedz, C. L., Katikireddi, S. V., Pell, J. P., et al. (2014). The association between life course socioeconomic position and life satisfaction in different welfare states: European comparative study of individuals in early old age. Age and Ageing, 43(3), 431–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Pinquart, M., Sörensen, S. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: a meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 15(2), 187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, R. E., Richards, L. N., Bengtson, V. (1991). Intergenerational solidarity in families: Untangling the ties that bind. Marriage & Family Review, 16(1–2), 1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, A. S., Rossi, P. H. (1990). Of human Bonding: Parent-Child Relations across the Life Course. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rowe, J. W., Kahn, R. L. (1997). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37(4), 433–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, J. W., Kahn, R. L. (1998). Successful Aging: The MacArthur Foundation Study. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Beyond Ponce de Leon and life satisfaction: New directions in quest of successful ageing. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12(1), 3555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos-Eggimann, B., Junod, J., Cornaz, S. (2005). Health services utilisation in older Europeans. Health, ageing and retirement in Europe: First results from the survey of healthy ageing and retirement in Europe. Mannheim, Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Ageing, 131–40.Google Scholar
Shmotkin, D. (2005). Happiness in the face of adversity: Reformulating the dynamic and modular bases of subjective well-being. Review of General Psychology, 9(4), 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M., Bengtson, V. L. (1991). Do close parent-child relations reduce the mortality risk of older parents? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 382–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverstein, M., Lowenstein, A., Katz, R., et al. (2013). Intergenerational support and the emotional well-being of older Jews and Arabs in Israel. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 950–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Tilburg, T. G. (1995). Delineation of the social network and differences in network size. Living Arrangements and Social Networks of Older Adults, 8396.Google Scholar
Wahl, H. W., Tesch-Römer, C., Hoff, A. (2007). New Dynamics in Old Age: Individual, Environmental, and Societal Perspectives. Baywood Pub Co.Google Scholar
Walker, A. (2009). The emergence and application of active ageing in Europe. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 21, 7593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, L. M., Theou, O., Pena, F., et al. (2015). Social vulnerability as a predictor of mortality and disability: cross-country differences in the survey of health, aging, and retirement in Europe (SHARE). Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 27(3), 365–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, J. (2013). Thinking generations. The British Journal of Sociology, 64(2), 216–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO, A. A. (2002). A Policy Framework. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Wolf, D. A., Ballal, S. S. (2006). Family support for older people in an era of demographic change and policy constraints. Ageing and Society, 26(05), 693706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, Y., Brasher, M. S., Gu, D., et al. (2016). Older parents benefit more in health outcome from daughters’ than sons’ emotional care in China. Journal of Aging and Health, 28(8), 1426–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×