Arrow, KJ. 1962. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 609–25.Google Scholar

Brennan, TJ. 2007. Should Innovation Rationalize Supra-Competitive Prices? A Skeptical Speculation. In Fredenberg, A. (ed.), The Pros and Cons of High Prices. Stockholm: Konkurrensverket/Swedish Competition Authority, pp. 88–127.Google Scholar

Carlton, D., Gans, JS., and Waldman, M.. 2010. Why Tie a Product Consumers Do Not Use? American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2(3), 85–105.Google Scholar

Department of Justice. 2010. Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Proposed. Washington, DC: Mimeo.Google Scholar

Evans, DS. and Schmalensee, R.. 2002. Some Economic Aspects of Antitrust Analysis in Dynamically Competitive Industries. In Jaffe, A.B., Lerner, J. and Stern, S. (eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 2, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, chapter 1.Google Scholar

Fisher, FM. 2000. The IBM and Microsoft Cases: What’s the Difference? American Economic Review, 90(2) 180–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gans, JS. 2009. Negotiating for the Market. Melbourne: Mimeo.Google Scholar

Gans, J.S. 2010. When is Static Analysis a Sufficient Proxy for Dynamic Considerations? Reconsidering Innovation and Antitrust. In Lerner, J. and Stern, S. (eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 11. Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar

Gans, J.S. 2013. Intel and Blocking Practices (2010). In Kwoka, J. and White, L. (eds.), The Antitrust Revolution, 6th edition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gans, JS. and Persson, L.. 2013. Entrepreneurial Commercialization Choices and the Interaction between IPR and Competition Policy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(1), 131–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gans, JS. and Stern, S.. 2000. Incumbency and R&D Incentives: Licensing the Gale of Creative Destruction. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 9(4), 485–511.Google Scholar

Gans, J.S. and Stern, S.. 2003. The Product Market and the “Market for Ideas”: Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 32(2), 333–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, R. 2006. Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where Are We in the Competition Innovation Debate? In Jaffe, Adam B., Lerner, Josh, and Stern, Scott (eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, 6, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Gilbert, R. 2007. Holding Innovation to an Antitrust Standard. Competition Policy International, 3, 47–77.Google Scholar

Gilbert, R. and Newbery, D.. 1982. Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly. American Economic Review, 72(3), 514–26.Google Scholar

Manne, G. and Wright, J.. 2009. “Innovation and the Limits of Antitrust,” George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 09–54; Lewis & Clark Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009–26. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1490849.Google Scholar

Ordover, J. and Willig, R.. 1981. An Economic Definition of Predation: Pricing and Product Innovation. Yale Law Journal, 9, 8–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rasmussen, E. 1988. Entry for Buyout. Journal of Industrial Economics, 36(3), 281–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reinganum, J.F. 1989. On the Timing of Innovation. In Schmalansee, R. and Willig, R. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 849–908.Google Scholar

Segal, I. and Whinston, M.. 2007. Antitrust in Innovative Industries. American Economic Review, 97(5), 1703–30.Google Scholar

Teece, DJ. 1987. Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing, and Public Policy. In Teece, DJ. (ed.), The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 185–220.Google Scholar