Book contents
- Maternal Hemodynamics
- Maternal Hemodynamics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Section 1 Physiology of Normal Pregnancy
- Section 2 Pathological Pregnancy: Screening and Established Disease
- Section 3 Techniques: How To Do
- Section 4 Cardiovascular Therapies
- Section 5 Controversies
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Section 3 - Techniques: How To Do
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2018
Book contents
- Maternal Hemodynamics
- Maternal Hemodynamics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Section 1 Physiology of Normal Pregnancy
- Section 2 Pathological Pregnancy: Screening and Established Disease
- Section 3 Techniques: How To Do
- Section 4 Cardiovascular Therapies
- Section 5 Controversies
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Maternal Hemodynamics , pp. 101 - 140Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
References
Laurent, S, Cockcroft, J, Van Bortel, L, et al. Expert Consensus Document on Arterial Stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 2006;27:2588–605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, D. Point: flow-mediated dilation does reflect nitric oxide-mediated endothelial function. J Appl Physiol 2005; 99:1233–1234; discussion 1237–8.Google Scholar
Verma, S, Buchanan, MR, Anderson, TJ. Endothelial function testing as a biomarker of vascular disease. Circulation 2003;108:2054–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, RA, Nishiyama, SK, Wray, DW, and Richardson, RS. Ultrasound Assessment of Flow-Mediated Dilation. Hypertension 2010;55:1075–85, originally published April 14, 2010.Google ScholarPubMed
Savvidou, MD, Kametas, NA, Donald, AE, Nicolaides, KH. Non-invasive assessment of endothelial function in normal pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:502–7.Google Scholar
Savvidou, MD, Hingorani, AD, Tsikas, D, Frölich, JC, Vallance, P, Nicolaides, KH. Endothelial dysfunction and raised plasma concentrations of asymmetric dimethylarginine in pregnant women who subsequently develop pre-eclampsia.The Lancet, 2003;361(9368):1511–17.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, I, Webb, D. Venous occlusion plethysmography in cardiovascular research: methodology and clinical applications. Br J ClinPharmacol 2001;52:631–46.Google ScholarPubMed
Whitney, RJ. The measurement of volume changes in human limbs. J Physiol (Lond). 1953;121:1–27.Google Scholar
Benjamin, N, Calver, A, Collier, J, Robinson, B, Vallance, P, Webb, D. Measuring forearm blood flow and interpreting the responses to drugs and mediators. Hypertension 1995;25:918–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hausvater, A, Giannone, T, Sandoval, YH, et al. The association between preeclampsia and arterial stiffness. J Hypertens. 2012; 30:17–33.Google Scholar
Panza, JA, Epstein, SE, Quyyumi, AA. Circadian variation in vascular tone and its relation to alpha sympathetic vasoconstriction. N Engl J Med 1991;325:986–90.Google Scholar
Horváth, IG1, Németh, A, Lenkey, Z, et al. Invasive validation of a new oscillometric device (Arteriograph) for measuring augmentation index, central blood pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens 2010;28:2068–75.Google Scholar
London, GM, Blacher, J, Pannier, B et al. Arterial wave reflections and survival in end-stage renal failure. Hypertension 2001;38:434–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khalil, A, Jauniaux, E, Cooper, D, Harrington, K. Pulse wave analysis in normal pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study. PLoS ONE 2009; 4: e6134Google Scholar
van Leeuwen-Segarceanu, EM, Tromp, WF, Bos, WJ, Vogels, OJ, Groothoff, JW, van der Lee, JH.Comparison of two instruments measuring carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity: Vicorder versus SphygmoCor. J Hypertens 2010;28: 1687–91.Google Scholar
Karamanoglu, M, O’Rourke, MF, Avolio, AP, et al. An analysis of the relationship between central aortic and peripheral upper limb pressure waves in man. Eur Heart J 1993;14:160–167.Google Scholar
Chen-Huan, C, Nevo, E, Fetics, B, et al. Estimation of central aortic pressure waveform by mathematical transformation of radial tonometry pressure. Circulation 1997;95:1827–36.Google Scholar
Khalil, A, Garcia-Mandujano, R, Maiz, N, Elkhouli, M, Nicolaides, KH. Longitudinal changes in maternal hemodynamics in a population at risk for pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, A, Akolekar, R, Syngelaki, A, Elkhouli, M, Nicolaides, KH. Maternal hemodynamics at 11–13 weeks’ gestation and risk of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;40:28–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khalil, A, Garcia-Mandujano, R, Chiriac, R, Akolekar, R, Nicolaides, KH. Maternal hemodynamics at 11–13 weeks’ gestation in gestational diabetes mellitus. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012;31:216–20.Google Scholar
Hwang, MH, Yoo, JK, Kim, HK, et al. Validity and reliability of aortic pulse wave velocity and augmentation index determined by the new cuff-based SphygmoCorXcel. J Hum Hypertens 2014;28:475–81.Google Scholar
Park, CM, Korolkova, O, Davies, JE, et al. Arterial pressure: agreement between a brachial cuff-based device and radial tonometry. J Hypertens. 2014;32(4):865–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Praciano De Sousa, PC, GurgelAlves, JA, Bezerra, ME, et al. Brachial artery flowmediated dilation and pulsatility index change as independent predictors for hypertensive disorders in the second trimester of pregnancy. Eur J ObstetGynecolReprod Biol. 2016;200: 94–7.Google Scholar
Iacobaeus, C, Kahan, T, Jörneskog, G, Bremme, K, Thorsell, M, Andolf, E. Fetal growth is associated with first-trimester maternal vascular function. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;48(4):483–90.Google Scholar
Brewster, S, Floras, J, Zinman, B, Retnakaran, R. Endothelial function in women with and without a history of glucose intolerance in pregnancy. J Diabetes Res. 2013;2013:382670.Google ScholarPubMed
Lampinen, KH, Rönnback, M, Groop, PH, Kaaja, RJ. A relationship between insulin sensitivity and vasodilation in women with a history of preeclamptic pregnancy.Hypertension. 2008;52(2):394–401.Google Scholar
Agatisa, PK, Ness, RB, Roberts, JM, Costantino, JP, Kuller, LH, McLaughlin, MK.Impairment of endothelial function in women with a history of preeclampsia: an indicator of cardiovascular risk. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;286(4):H1389–93.Google Scholar
Savvidou, MD, Kaihura, C, Anderson, JM, Nicolaides, KH. Maternal arterial stiffness in women who subsequently develop pre-eclampsia. Berger, JS, ed. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(5):e18703.Google Scholar
Macedo, ML, Luminoso, D, Savvidou, MD, McEniery, CM, Nicolaides, KH. Maternal wave reflections and arterial stiffness in normal pregnancy as assessed by applanation tonometry. Hypertension. 2008;51:1047–51.Google Scholar
Kaihura, C, Savvidou, MD, Anderson, JM, McEniery, CM, Nicolaides, KH. Maternal arterial stiffness in pregnancies affected by preeclampsia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ. 2009;297(2):H759–H764.Google Scholar
Stea, F, Bozec, E, Millasseau, S, Khettab, H, Boutouyrie, P, Laurent, S. Comparison of the Complior Analyse device with Sphygmocor and Complior SP for pulse wave velocity and central pressure assessment.J Hypertens. 2014;32(4):873–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Everett, TR, Mahendru, A, McEniery, CM, Lees, CC, Wilkinson, IB. A comparison of SphygmoCor and Vicorder devices for measuring aortic pulse wave velocity in pregnancy. Artery Research, 2012;6(2):92–6.Google Scholar
Lan, P, Keehn, L, Milne, L, McNeill, K, Chowienczyk, P, Sinha, MD. Pulse wave analysis and the risk of early-onset pre-eclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertension. 2016;5:1:26.Google Scholar
References
Pang, CC. Measurement of body venous tone. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2000;44(2):341–60.Google Scholar
Pang, CC. Autonomic control of the venous system in health and disease: effects of drugs. Pharmacol Ther. 2001;90(2–3):179–230.Google Scholar
Gelman, S. Venous function and central venous pressure: a physiologic story. Anesthesiology. 2008;108(4):735–48.Google Scholar
Lui, EY, Steinman, AH, Cobbold, RS, Johnston, KW. Human factors as a source of error in peak Doppler velocity measurement. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42(5):972–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gyselaers, W, Molenberghs, G, Van Mieghem, W, Ombelet, W. Doppler measurement of renal interlobar vein impedance index in uncomplicated and preeclamptic pregnancies. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2009;28(1):23–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teichgraber, UK, Gebel, M, Benter, T, Manns, MP. Effect of respiration, exercise, and food intake on hepatic vein circulation. J Ultrasound Med. 1997;16(8):549–54.Google Scholar
Kinsella, SM, Lohmann, G. Supine hypotensive syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83(5 Pt 1):774–88.Google ScholarPubMed
Verbeke, G MG. Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data. 2nd edn. New York: Springer; 2001.Google Scholar
Laenen, A, Vangeneugden, T, Geys, H, Molenberghs, G. Generalized reliability estimation using repeated measurements. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2006; 59(Pt 1):113–31.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. SAS/IML software: Changes and enhancements through release. 1995. Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Gyselaers, W, Mullens, W, Tomsin, K, Mesens, T, Peeters, L. Role of dysfunctional maternal venous hemodynamics in the pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(2):123–9.Google Scholar
Gyselaers, W, Molenberghs, G, Mesens, T, Peeters, L. Maternal hepatic vein Doppler velocimetry during uncomplicated pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35(8):1278–83.Google Scholar
Tomsin, K, Mesens, T, Molenberghs, G, Gyselaers, W. Venous pulse transit time in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Reprod Sci. 2012;19(4):431–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staelens, AS, Tomsin, K, Oben, J, Mesens, T, Grieten, L, Gyselaers, W. Improving the reliability of venous doppler flow measurements: relevance of combined ECG, training and repeated measures. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014;40(7):1722–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mesens, T, Tomsin, K, Molenberghs, G, Gyselaers, W. Reproducibility and repeatability of maternal venous Doppler flow measurements in renal interlobar and hepatic veins. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36(1):120–1.Google Scholar
Gyselaers, W. Hemodynamics of the maternal venous compartment: a new area to explore in obstetric ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32(5):716–7.Google Scholar
Spentzouris, G, Zandian, A, Cesmebasi, A, et al. The clinical anatomy of the inferior vena cava: a review of common congenital anomalies and considerations for clinicians. Clin Anat. 2014;27(8):1234–43.Google Scholar
Kruskal, JB, Newman, PA, Sammons, LG, Kane, RA. Optimizing Doppler and color flow US: application to hepatic sonography. Radiographics. 2004;24(3):657–75.Google Scholar
Helenon, O, Correas, JM, Chabriais, J, Boyer, JC, Melki, P, Moreau, JF. Renal vascular Doppler imaging: clinical benefits of power mode. Radiographics. 1998;18(6):1441–54; discussion 55–7.Google Scholar
Bateman, GA, Cuganesan, R. Renal vein Doppler sonography of obstructive uropathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178(4):921–5.Google Scholar
Mesens, T, Tomsin, K, Oben, J, Staelens, A, Gyselaers, W. Maternal venous hemodynamics assessment for prediction of preeclampsia should be longitudinal. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(3):311–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Singh, S, Goyal, A. The origin of echocardiography: a tribute to Inge Edler. Tex Heart Inst J. 2007;34(4):431–8.Google Scholar
Oxborough, D. A practical approach to transthoracic echocardiography. Brit J Cardiac Nurs. 2008;3:163–9.Google Scholar
Regitz-Zagrosek, V, Blomstrom Lundqvist, C, Borghi, C, et al. ESC Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: the Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2011;32(24):3147–97.Google ScholarPubMed
Teichholz, LE, Kreulen, T, Herman, MV, Gorlin, R. Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence of absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol. 1976;37(1):7–11.Google Scholar
Kronik, G, Slany, J, Mosslacher, H. Comparative value of eight M-mode echocardiographic formulas for determining left ventricular stroke volume. A correlative study with thermodilution and left ventricular single-plane cineangiography. Circulation. 1979;60(6):1308–16.Google Scholar
van Oppen, AC, Stigter, RH, Bruinse, HW. Cardiac output in normal pregnancy: a critical review. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(2):310–8.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, H. Role of M-mode technique in today’s echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(3):240–57; 335–7.Google Scholar
Melchiorre, K, Sharma, R, Thilaganathan, B. Cardiac structure and function in normal pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;24(6):413–21.Google Scholar
McNamara, H, Barclay, P, Sharma, V. Accuracy and precision of the ultrasound cardiac output monitor (USCOM 1A) in pregnancy: comparison with three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113(4):669–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poppas, A, Shroff, SG, Korcarz, CE, et al. Serial assessment of the cardiovascular system in normal pregnancy. Role of arterial compliance and pulsatile arterial load. Circulation. 1997;95(10):2407–15.Google Scholar
Dey, I, Sprivulis, P. Emergency physicians can reliably assess emergency department patient cardiac output using the USCOM continuous wave Doppler cardiac output monitor. Emerg Med Australas. 2005;17(3):193–9.Google Scholar
Marik, PE. Noninvasive cardiac output monitors: a state-of the-art review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27(1):121–34.Google Scholar
Mahendru, AA, Everett, TR, Wilkinson, IB, Lees, CC, McEniery, CM. A longitudinal study of maternal cardiovascular function from preconception to the postpartum period. J Hypertens. 2014;32(4):849–56.Google Scholar
Jhanji, S, Dawson, J, Pearse, RM. Cardiac output monitoring: basic science and clinical application. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(2):172–81.Google Scholar
Staelens, AS, Bertrand, PB, Vonck, S, Malbrain, MLNG, Gyselaers, W. Non-invasive methods for maternal cardiac output monitoring. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2015:1–17.Google Scholar
Wallenburg, HC. Maternal haemodynamics in pregnancy. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 1990;2(01):45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keren, H, Burkhoff, D, Squara, P. Evaluation of a noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system based on thoracic bioreactance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;293(1):H583–9.Google Scholar
Easterling, TR, Benedetti, TJ, Carlson, KL, Watts, DH. Measurement of cardiac output in pregnancy by thermodilution and impedance techniques. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;96(1):67–9.Google Scholar
Dyson, KS, Shoemaker, JK, Arbeille, P, Hughson, RL. Model flow estimates of cardiac output compared with Doppler ultrasound during acute changes in vascular resistance in women. Exp Physiol. 2010;95(4):561–8.Google Scholar
Rang, S, de Pablo Lapiedra, B, van Montfrans, GA, Bouma, BJ, Wesseling, KH, Wolf, H. Modelflow: a new method for noninvasive assessment of cardiac output in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(3):235 e1–8.Google Scholar
Elvan-Taspinar, A, Uiterkamp, LA, Sikkema, JM, et al. Validation and use of the Finometer for blood pressure measurement in normal, hypertensive and pre-eclamptic pregnancy. J Hypertens. 2003;21(11):2053–60.Google Scholar
Gibbons, RJ, Balady, GJ, Beasley, JW, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for Exercise Testing. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30(1):260–311.Google Scholar
Meah, VL, Cockcroft, J, Stöhr, EJ. Maternal cardiac twist pre-pregnancy: potential as a novel marker of pre-eclampsia. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2013;24(4):289–95.Google Scholar
Armstrong, WF, Ryan, T. Feigenbaum’s Echocardiography. 7th edn: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.Google Scholar
Lorenz, CH, Walker, ES, Morgan, VL, Klein, SS, Graham, TP, Jr. Normal human right and left ventricular mass, systolic function, and gender differences by cine magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 1999;1(1):7–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
La Gerche, A, Claessen, G, Van de Bruaene, A, et al. Cardiac MRI: a new gold standard for ventricular volume quantification during high-intensity exercise. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(2):329–38.Google Scholar
Jakovljevic, DG, Nunan, D, Donovan, G, Hodges, LD, Sandercock, GR, Brodie, DA. Comparison of cardiac output determined by different rebreathing methods at rest and at peak exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008;102(5):593–9.Google Scholar
Peyton, PJ, Bailey, M, Thompson, BR. Reproducibility of cardiac output measurement by the nitrous oxide rebreathing technique. J Clin Monit Comput. 2009;23(4):233–6.Google Scholar
Schutte, AE, Huisman, HW, Van Rooyen, JM, Oosthuizen, W, Jerling, JC. Sensitivity of the Finometer device in detecting acute and medium-term changes in cardiovascular function. Blood Press Monit. 2003;8(5):195–201.Google Scholar
References
Scholten, RR, Sep, S, Peeters, L, Hopman, MT, Lotgering, FK, Spaanderman, ME. Prepregnancy low-plasma volume and predisposition to preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(5):1085–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donckers, J, Scholten, RR, Oyen, WJ, Hopman, MT, Lotgering, FK, Spaanderman, ME. Unexplained first trimester recurrent pregnancy loss and low venous reserves. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(9):2613–8.Google Scholar
Freis, ED, Kenny, JF. Plasma Volume, Total Circulating Protein, and “Available Fluid” Abnormalities in Preeclampsia and Eclampsia. J Clin Invest. 1948;27(2):283–9.Google Scholar
Salas, SP, Marshall, G, Gutierrez, BL, Rosso, P. Time course of maternal plasma volume and hormonal changes in women with preeclampsia or fetal growth restriction. Hypertension. 2006;47(2):203–8.Google Scholar
Gallery, ED, Hunyor, SN, Gyory, AZ. Plasma volume contraction: a significant factor in both pregnancy-associated hypertension (pre-eclampsia) and chronic hypertension in pregnancy. Q J Med. 1979;48(192):593–602.Google Scholar
Welker, H. Bestimmungen der Menge des Körperblutes und der Blutfärbekraft, sowie Bestimmungen von Zahl, Maass, Oberfläche und Volumen des einzelnen Blutkörpercherns beim Thier und beim Menschen. Präger Vrtljschr. 1854.Google Scholar
Von Vierordt, KH. Das Abhängigkeitsgesetz der mittleren Kreislaufszeiten von den mittleren Puls-Frequenzen der Tierarten. Arch. f. physiol. Heilk. N. F. 1858;2:527.Google Scholar
Phillips, RA, Yeomans, A, Dole, VP, Farr, LE, Van Slyke, DD, Hogan, D. Estimation of blood volume from change in blood specific gravity following a plasma infusion. J Clin Invest. 1946;25:261–9.Google Scholar
Valentin, G. Versuche über die in dem thierischen Körper enthaltene Blutmenge. Repert f Anat u Physiol. 1838;3:281.Google Scholar
Brown, MA, Mitar, DA, Whitworth, JA. Measurement of plasma volume in pregnancy. Clin Sci (Lond). 1992;83(1):29–34.Google Scholar
Haneda, K, Horiuchi, T. A method for measurement of total circulating blood volume using indocyanine green. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1986;148(1):49–56.Google Scholar
International Committee for Standardization in Haematology. Recommended methods for measurement of red-cell and plasma volume: International Committee for Standardization in Haematology. J Nucl Med. 1980;21(8):793–800.Google Scholar
Walker, WG, Ross, RS, Hammond, JD. Study of the relationship between plasma volume and transcapillary protein exchange using I 131-labeled albumin and I 125-labeled globulin. Circ Res. 1960;8:1028–40.Google Scholar
Dubick, MA, Wade, CE. A review of the efficacy and safety of 7.5% NaCl/6% dextran 70 in experimental animals and in humans. J Trauma. 1994;36(3):323–30.Google Scholar
van Kreel, BK, van Beek, E, Spaanderman, ME, Peeters, LL. A new method for plasma volume measurements with unlabeled dextran-70 instead of 125I-labeled albumin as an indicator. Clin Chim Acta. 1998;275(1):71–80.Google Scholar
Najean, Y, Dresch, C, Ardaillou, N, Bernard, J. Iron metabolism – a study of different kinetic models in normal conditions. Am J Physiol. 1967;213(2):533–46.Google Scholar
Ricketts, C, Cavill, I. Measurement of plasma volume using 59Fe-labelled transferrin. J Clin Pathol. 1978;31(2):196–8.Google Scholar
Tschaikowsky, K, Meisner, M, Durst, R, Rugheimer, E. Blood volume determination using hydroxyethyl starch: a rapid and simple intravenous injection method. Crit Care Med. 1997;25(4):599–606.Google Scholar
Vricella, LK, Louis, JM, Chien, E, Mercer, BM. Blood volume determination in obese and normal-weight gravidas: the hydroxyethyl starch method. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(3):408 e1–6.Google Scholar
Soens, MA, Birnbach, DJ, Ranasinghe, JS, van Zundert, A. Obstetric anesthesia for the obese and morbidly obese patient: an ounce of prevention is worth more than a pound of treatment. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52(1):6–19.Google Scholar
Forster, H, Wicarkzyk, C, Dudziak, R. Determination of the plasma elimination of hydroxyethyl starch and dextran using improved analytical methods. Infusionsther Klin Ernahr. 1981;8(2):88–94.Google Scholar
De Lorenzo, A, Deurenberg, P, Andreoli, A, Sasso, GF, Palestini, M, Docimo, R. Multifrequency impedance in the assessment of body water losses during dialysis. Ren Physiol Biochem. 1994;17(6):326–32.Google Scholar
De Lorenzo, A, Candeloro, N, Andreoli, A, Deurenberg, P. Determination of intracellular water by multifrequency bioelectrical impedance. Ann Nutr Metab. 1995;39(3):177–84.Google Scholar
Valensise, H, Andreoli, A, Lello, S, Magnani, F, Romanini, C, De Lorenzo, A. Multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis in women with a normal and hypertensive pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72(3):780–3.Google Scholar
da Silva, EG, Carvalhaes, MA, Hirakawa, HS, Peracoli, JC. Bioimpedance in pregnant women with preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2010;29(4):357–65.Google Scholar
Yasuda, R, Takeuchi, K, Funakoshi, T, Maruo, T. Bioelectrical impedance analysis in the clinical management of preeclamptic women with edema. J Perinat Med. 2003;31(4):275–80.Google Scholar