Book contents
- Genetically Modified Organisms in Developing CountriesRisk Analysis and Governance
- Genetically Modified Organisms in Developing Countries
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Risk Analysis Methodology and Decision-Making
- Part II Diversification of Expertise
- Part III Risk-Analysis-Based Regulatory Systems
- 13 The Risk Analysis Framework and Biosafety Policy
- 14 The Precautionary Principle as a Barrier to GMO Risk Analysis: Elicitation of Experts’ Viewpoints
- 15 How Do Socio-Political Disputes Concerning GMOs Influence Decision-Making in Developing Countries?
- 16 Biosafety Communication: Beyond Risk Communication
- 17 The Role of Mass Media and Lobbies in the Formulation of GMO Regulations
- Part IV Case Studies from Developing Countries
- Index
- References
17 - The Role of Mass Media and Lobbies in the Formulation of GMO Regulations
from Part III - Risk-Analysis-Based Regulatory Systems
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2017
By
Book contents
- Genetically Modified Organisms in Developing CountriesRisk Analysis and Governance
- Genetically Modified Organisms in Developing Countries
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Risk Analysis Methodology and Decision-Making
- Part II Diversification of Expertise
- Part III Risk-Analysis-Based Regulatory Systems
- 13 The Risk Analysis Framework and Biosafety Policy
- 14 The Precautionary Principle as a Barrier to GMO Risk Analysis: Elicitation of Experts’ Viewpoints
- 15 How Do Socio-Political Disputes Concerning GMOs Influence Decision-Making in Developing Countries?
- 16 Biosafety Communication: Beyond Risk Communication
- 17 The Role of Mass Media and Lobbies in the Formulation of GMO Regulations
- Part IV Case Studies from Developing Countries
- Index
- References
Summary
Mass media are intermediaries between citizens and governments in the formulation of national GMO regulation, and are used by different interest groups in an attempt to influence consumer attitudes and policy outcome. The channels through which mass media influence the public perception towards GM crops and food and the achievement of a political equilibrium to formulate GMO regulations are discussed based on social science and political economy literature. Correlation between indicators of regulation quality, mass media and the restrictiveness of GMO regulations are also shown, distinguishing between developed and less developed countries. Finally, recommendations for communication strategies are derived, taking into account the challenges of modern media and the regulation of new plant breeding techniques
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Genetically Modified Organisms in Developing CountriesRisk Analysis and Governance, pp. 200 - 212Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Aerni, P. et al. (2015). Agricultural biotechnology and public attitudes: an attempt to explain the mismatch between experience and perception. In Genetically Modified Organisms in Food, ed. Watson, R. R. and Preedy, V. R.. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 149–156.Google Scholar
Aerni, P. et al. (2016). The role of biotechnology in combating climate change: a question of politics? Science and Public Policy 43, 13–28.Google Scholar
Botelho, D. and Kurtz, H. (2008). The introduction of genetically modified food in the United States and the United Kingdom: a news analysis. The Social Science Journal 45, 13–27.Google Scholar
Cook, G. (2004). Genetically Modified Language: The Discourse of Arguments for GM Crops and Food. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa-Font, M. et al. (2008). Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: review and implications for food policy. Food Policy 33, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, K. et al. (2008). Differences in global risk perceptions of biotechnology and the political economy of the media. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 8(1–2), 77–89.Google Scholar
DeRosier, C. et al. (2015). A comparative analysis of media reporting of perceived risks and benefits of genetically modified crops and foods in Kenyan and international newspapers. Public Understanding of Science 24(5), 563–581.Google Scholar
EurActive (2016a). Decision on new plant breeding techniques further delayed. 31 March 2016.Google Scholar
EurActive (2016b). Trade body: don't lump ‘new plant breeding techniques’ in with GMOs. 3 May 2016.Google Scholar
Frewer, L. J. et al. (2003). Communicating about the risks and benefits of genetically modified food: the mediating role of trust. Risk Analysis 23(6), 1117–1133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M. W. (2001). Biotechnology 1996–2000: The Years of Controversy. London: Science Museum.Google Scholar
Gaskell, G. et al. (1999). Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S. Science 285, 384–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaskell, G. et al. (2004). GM foods and the misperception of risk perception. Risk Analysis 24(1), 185–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrop, M. 1987. Voters and the media. In The Media in British Politics, ed. Seaton, J and Pimlott, B. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
Holmgreen, L. L. and Vestergaard, T. (2009). Evaluation and audience acceptance in biotech news texts. Journal of Pragmatics 41, 586–601.Google Scholar
Jones, H. D. (2015). Regulatory uncertainty over genome editing. Nature Plants, 8 January 2015. [Online]. Available from www.nature.com/articles/nplants201411CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, R. et al. (2015). Risk communication for GM foods in South Korea: the role of media and government. International Food Research Journal 22(5), 1878–1882.Google Scholar
Lore, T. et al. (2013). A framing analysis of newspaper coverage of genetically modified crops in Kenya. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information 14(2), 132–150.Google Scholar
Lusser, M. et al. (2012). Deployment of new biotechnologies in plant breeding. Nature Biotechnology 30(3), 231–239.Google Scholar
McCluskey, J. J. and Swinnen, J. F. M. (2004). Political economy of the media and consumer perceptions of biotechnology. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(5), 1230–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCluskey, J. et al. (2016). Media coverage, public perceptions, and consumer behavior: insights from new food technologies. Annual Review of Resource Economics 8, 467–486.Google Scholar
Nisbet, M. and Lewenstein, B. V. (2001). A Comparison of U.S. Media Coverage of Biotechnology with Public Perceptions of Genetic Engineering 1995–1999. International Public Communication of Science and Technology Conference, Geneva, Switzerland, 1–3 February, 2001.Google Scholar
Petts, J. et al. (2001). Social Amplification of Risk: The Media and the Public. Contract Research Report 329/2001. Health and Safety Executive.Google Scholar
Strömberg, D. (2001). Mass media and public policy. European Economic Review 45, 652–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strömberg, D. (2004). Mass media competition, political competition, and public policy. Review of Economic Studies 71, 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ventura, V. et al. (2016). How scary! An analysis of visual communication concerning genetically modified organisms in Italy. Public Understanding of Science, 1 April 2016.Google Scholar
Vigani, M. and Olper, A. (2013). GMO standards, endogenous policy and the market for information. Food Policy 43, 32–43.Google Scholar
Vigani, M. and Olper, A. (2014). GM-free private standards, public regulation of GM products and mass media. Environment and Development Economics 19(6), 743–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigani, M. and Olper, A. (2015). Patterns and determinants of GMO regulations: an overview of recent evidence. AgBioForum 18(1), article 6.Google Scholar
Vilella-Vila, M. and Costa-Font, J. (2008). Press media reporting effects on risk perceptions and attitudes towards genetically modified (GM) food. The Journal of Socio-Economics 37, 2095–2106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by