Abbott, A. (2015). Europe's genetically edited plants stuck in legal limbo. Scientists frustrated at delay in deciding if GM regulations apply to precision gene editing. Nature 528, 319–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ACRE (2012). ACRE advice: New techniques used in plant breeding. [Online]. Available from www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/239542/new-techniques-used-in-plant-breeding.pdfGoogle Scholar

Ainsworth, C. (2015). Agriculture: A new breed of edits. Nature 528, S14–S15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anon, . (2015a). Seeds of change. The European Union faces a fresh battle over next-generation plant-breeding techniques. Nature 520, 131–132.Google Scholar

Anon, . (2015b). Crop conundrum. The EU should decide definitively whether gene-edited plants are covered by GM laws. Nature 528, 307–308.Google Scholar

Armstead, I. et al. (2009). Bioinformatics in the orphan crops. Briefs in Bioinformatics 10, 645–653.Google Scholar

Belhaj, K. et al. (2015). Editing plant genomes with CRISPR/Cas9. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 32, 76–84.Google Scholar

Berg, P. (2008). Meetings that changed the world: Asilomar 1975: DNA modification secured. Nature 455, 290–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bhaya, D. et al. (2011). CRISPR–Cas systems in bacteria and archaea: versatile small RNAs for adaptive defense and regulation. Annual Review of Genetics 45, 273–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Breyer, D. et al. (2009). Genetic modification through oligonucleotide-mediated mutagenesis. A GMO regulatory challenge? Environmental Biosafety Research 8(2), 57–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cernansky, R. (2015). Super vegetables. Nature 522, 146–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Covshoff, S. and Hibberd, J. M. (2012). Integrating C₄ photosynthesis into C₃ crops to increase yield potential. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 23, 209–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davis, E. (2015). Genome editing: which should I choose, TALEN or CRISPR? Technical note, GeneCopoeia Inc. [Online]. Available from www.genecopoeia.com/resource/genome-editing-talen-or-crispr/Google Scholar

Dawson, I. K. and Jaenicke, H. (2006). Underutilised plant species: the role of biotechnology. Position Paper No. 1. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Centre for Underutilised Crops.Google Scholar

Dolgin, E. (2015). GM microbes created that can't escape the lab. Engineered bacteria kept in check with a designer diet. Nature 517, 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dong, C. et al. (2006). Oligonucleotide-directed gene repair in wheat using a transient plasmid gene repair assay system. Plant Cell Reports 25, 457–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Edwards, D. and Batley, J. (2010). Plant genome sequencing: applications for crop improvement. Plant Biotechnology Journal 8, 2–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eklöf, S. (2015). CRISPR/Cas9 mutated Arabidopsis. [Online]. Swedish Board of Agriculture, Jönköping. Available from www.umu.se/digitalAssets/171/171717_backgroud-psbs.pdf and www.upsc.se/documents/Information_on_interpretation_on_CRISPR_Cas9_mutated_plants_Final.pdfGoogle Scholar

Engdahl, W. F. (2007). Seeds of Destruction – The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation. Montreal: Global Research.Google Scholar

Erbentraut, J. and Shapiro, L. (2015). The genetic revolution could curb world hunger and pesticide use. HuffPost Science 12 December 2015.Google Scholar

EU New Techniques Working Group (2012). Final report. [Online]. Available from www.seemneliit.ee/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/esa_12.0029.pdfGoogle Scholar

FAO, IFAD & WFP (2015). The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2015. Meeting the 2015 International Hunger Targets: Taking Stock of Uneven Progress. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar

Fita, A. et al. (2015). Breeding and domesticating crops adapted to drought and salinity: a new paradigm for increasing food production. Frontiers in Plant Science 6, 978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Foster, T. M. et al. (2015). Two quantitative trait loci, Dw1 and Dw2, are primarily responsible for rootstock-induced dwarfing in apple. Horticulture Research 2, 15001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gao, C. et al. (2014). Horizontal gene transfer in plants. Functional and Integrative Genomics 14, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hsu, P. D. et al. (2014). Development and applications of CRISPR–Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 157, 1262–1278.Google Scholar

James, C. (2015). Global status of commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2015. ISAAA Brief No. 49. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA. [Online]. Available from http://isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/51/executivesummary/default.aspGoogle Scholar

Kowalski, S. P. (2015). Golden Rice, open innovation, and sustainable gobal food security. Industrial Biotechnology 11, 84–90.Google Scholar

Kyndt, T. et al. (2015). The genome of cultivated sweet potato contains Agrobacterium T-DNAs with expressed genes: an example of a naturally transgenic food crop. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 112, 5844–5849.Google Scholar

Laible, G. et al. (2015). Improving livestock for agriculture – technological progress from random transgenesis to precision genome editing heralds a new era. Biotechnology Journal 10, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ledford, H. (2015). CRISPR, the disruptor. Nature 522, 20–24.Google Scholar

Lunshof, J. (2015). Regulate gene editing in wild animals. Nature 521, 127.Google Scholar

Mao, Y. et al. (2013). Application of the CRISPR–Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants. Molecular Plant 6, 2008–2011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Moghissi, A. A. et al. (2016) Golden Rice: scientific, regulatory and public information processes of a genetically modified organism. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 36(3), 535–541.Google ScholarPubMed

Murphy, D. J. (2007). Improved containment strategies in biopharming. Plant Biotechnology Journal 5, 555–569.Google Scholar

Murphy, D. J. (2011). Plants, Biotechnology, and Agriculture. Egham: CABI Press.Google Scholar

Murphy, D. J. (2014a). Using modern plant breeding to improve the nutritional and technological qualities of oil crops. Oilseeds & Fats Crops and Lipids 21, D607, DOI: 10.1051/ocl/2014038.Google Scholar

Murphy, D. J. (2014b). The future of oil palm as a major global crop: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Oil Palm Research 26, 1–24.Google Scholar

Napier, J. A. et al. (2015). Transgenic plants as a sustainable, terrestrial source of fish oils. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology 117(9), 1317–1324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

National Academies (2015). www.nationalacademies.org/gene-editing/index.htmGoogle Scholar

Nyman, M. (2014). New techniques and the GMO-legislation, Swedish Gene Technology Advisory Board, Mistra Biotech Workshop. [Online]. Available from www.genteknik.seGoogle Scholar

Okuzaki, A. and Toriyama, K. (2004). Chimeric RNA/DNA oligonucleotide-directed gene targeting in rice. Plant Cell Reports 22, 509–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Oye, K. A. et al. (2014). Biotechnology. Regulating gene drives. Science 345(6197), 626–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Petherick, A. et al. (2015). Genome editing. Nature 528, S1–S48.Google Scholar

Ricroch, A. E. and Hénard-Damave, M. C. (2015). Next biotech plants: new traits, crops, developers and technologies for addressing global challenges. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 36(4), 675–690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Roberts, A. F. et al. (2015). Biosafety research for non-target organism risk assessment of RNAi-based GE plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 6, 958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sanchez, P. A. (2015). En route to plentiful food production in Africa. Nature Plants 1, 1–2.Google Scholar

Soucy, S. M. et al. (2015). Horizontal gene transfer: building the web of life. Nature Reviews Genetics 16, 472–482.Google Scholar

Telem, R. S. et al. (2013). Cisgenics – a sustainable approach for crop improvement. Current Genomics 14, 468–476.Google Scholar

The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000). Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 795–815.Google Scholar

Vanhercke, T. et al. (2013). Metabolic engineering of plant oils and waxes for use as industrial feedstocks. Plant Biotechnology Journal 11, 196–210.Google Scholar

Wang, Y. et al. (2014). Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid breadwheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nature Biotechnology 32, 947–951.Google Scholar

Wolt, J. D. et al. (2016). The regulatory status of genome-edited crops. Plant Biotechnology Journal 14(2), 510–518.Google Scholar

Zhang, H. et al. (2014). The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation. Plant Biotechnology Journal 12, 797–807.Google Scholar

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (1996). USDA/APHIS Petition 95–352–01P for the Determination of Nonregulated Status for CZW-3 Squash. [Online]. Available from www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs2/95_35201p_com.pdfGoogle Scholar

Convention on Biological Diversity (2000). Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Text and Annexes. [Online]. Available from www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cartagena-protocol-en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Craig, W. et al. (2008). An overview of general features of risk assessment of genetically modified crops. Euphytica 164, 853–880.Google Scholar

EFSA (2010). Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy. EFSA Journal 8(11), 1879–1990.Google Scholar

EPA (1998). Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F. Federal Register 63(93), 26846–26924.Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, J. et al. (2009). Problem formulation in environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops: a Brazilian workshop. BioAssay 4, 5.Google Scholar

García-Alonso, M. (2013). Safety assessment of food and feed derived from GM crops: using problem formulation to ensure ‘fit for purpose’ risk assessment. Collection of Biosafety Reviews 8, 72–101.Google Scholar

Gray, A. (2012). Problem formulation in environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops: a practitioner's approach. Collection of Biosafety Reviews 6, 14–65.Google Scholar

Halpin, C. (2005). Gene stacking in transgenic plants – the challenge for 21st century plant biotechnology. Plant Biotechnology Journal 3, 141–155.Google Scholar

Herman, R. A. et al. (2013). Bringing policy relevance and scientific discipline to environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops. Trends in Biotechnology 31, 493–496.Google Scholar

James, C. (2012). Global Status of Commercialized Transgenic Crops. [Online]. Available from www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/44/executivesummary/default.aspGoogle Scholar

James, C. (2014). Global Status of Commercialized Transgenic Crops. [Online]. Available from www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/49/executivesummary/pdf/B49-ExecSum-English.pdfGoogle Scholar

Johnson, K. L. et al. (2007). How does scientific risk assessment of GM crops fit within the wider risk analysis? Trends in Plant Science 12, 1–5.Google Scholar

Julié-Galau, S. et al. (2014). Evaluation of the potential for interspecific hybridization between Camelina sativa and related wild Brassicaceae in anticipation of field trials of GM camelina. Transgenic Research 23, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Naqvi, S. et al. (2009). When more is better: multigene engineering in plants. Trends in Plant Science 15, 48–56.Google Scholar

Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (2005). Risk Analysis Framework 2005. [Online]. Available from www.ogtr.gov.au/internet/ogtr/publishing.nsf/content/raf-3/$FILE/raffinal2.2.pdfGoogle Scholar

Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (2013). Risk Analysis Framework 2013. [Online]. Available from www.ogtr.gov.au/internet/ogtr/publishing.nsf/content/raffinal5-tocGoogle Scholar

Que, Q. et al. (2010). Trait stacking in transgenic plants – challenges and opportunities. GM Crops 1(4), 220–229.Google Scholar

Rajan, R. S. and Letourneau, D. K. (2012). What risk assessments of genetically modified organisms can learn from institutional analyses of public health risks. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 203093, 8 pages, doi:10.1155/2012/203093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raybould, A. (2007). Ecological versus ecotoxicological methods for assessing the environmental risks of transgenic crops. Plant Science 173, 589–602.Google Scholar

Stein, A. J. and Rodriguez-Cerezo, E. (2009). The global pipeline of new GM crops: implications of asynchronous approval for international trade. [Online]. Available from http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=2420Google Scholar

Tepfer, M. et al. (2013). Putting problem formulation at the forefront of GMO risk analysis. GM Crops & Food 4, 10–15.Google Scholar

Tepfer, M. et al. (2015). A critical evaluation of whether recombination in virus-resistant transgenic plants will lead to the emergence of novel viral diseases. New Phytologist 207, 536–541.Google Scholar

Tepfer, M. and García-Arenal, F. (2015). Does recombination in virus-resistant transgenic plants lead to emergence of novel viral diseases? ISB News Report, June.Google Scholar

Wolt, J. D. et al. (2010). Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants. Transgenic Research 19(3), 425–436.Google Scholar

Arvidsson, G. (2015). Food security now or wait for research to assess risks? Genetically modified crops and smallholder farmers in Africa. Nordiska Afrikainstitutet Policy Note 3.Google Scholar

Brookes, G. and Barfoot, P. (2016). GM Crops: Global Socio-economic and Environmental Impacts 1996–2014. Dorchester: PG Economics Ltd.Google Scholar

Burachik, M. (2010). Experience from use of GMOs in Argentinian agriculture, economy and environment. New Biotechnology 27(5), 588–592.Google Scholar

CAC (2007). Working principles for risk analysis for food safety for application by governments. CAC/GL 62–2007.Google Scholar

Convention on Biological Diversity (2000). Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Text and Annexes. [Online]. Available from www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cartagena-protocol-en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Convention on Biological Diversity (2012). Guidance on risk assessment of living modified organisms. UNEP/CBD/BS/COP-MOP/6/13/Add.1. [Online]. Available from www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/bs/mop-06/official/mop-06-13-add1-en.pdfGoogle Scholar

Convention on Biological Diversity (2015). Guidance on risk assessment of living modified organisms and monitoring in the context of risk assessment. UNEP/CBD/BS/RARM/AHTEG/2015/1/4. [Online]. Available from www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/bs/bsrarm-ahteg-2015-01/official/bsrarm-ahteg-2015-01-04-en.pdfGoogle Scholar

European Food Safety Authority (2006). Guidance document of the scientific panel on genetically modified organisms for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed. EFSA Journal 99, 1–100.Google Scholar

Falck-Zepeda, J. et al. (2013). The current status of the debate on socio-economic regulatory assessments: positions and policies in Canada, the USA, the EU and developing countries. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development 10(4), 203–207.Google Scholar

FAO/WHO (1998). The application of risk communication to food standards and safety matters. [Online]. Available from www.fao.org/docrep/005/x1271e/X1271E01.htmGoogle Scholar

Fischer, K. et al. (2015). Social impacts of GM crops in agriculture: a systematic literature review. Sustainability 7(7), 8598–8620.Google Scholar

FoodRisC (2015). Website of the project ‘Perceptions and communication of food risk/benefits across Europe’. [Online]. Available from www.foodrisc.orgGoogle Scholar

Frewer, L. J. et al. (1998). Consumer acceptance of transgenic crops. Pesticide Science 52, 388–393.Google Scholar

Herman, R. A. et al. (2013). Bringing policy relevance and scientific discipline to environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops. Trends in Biotechnology 31(9), 493–496.Google Scholar

IRRI (undated). What is the status of the Golden Rice project coordinated by IRRI? [Online]. Available from http://irri.org/golden-rice/faqs/what-is-the-status-of-the-golden-rice-project-coordinated-by-irriGoogle Scholar

Kamanga, G. D. et al. (2014). Why communication and issues management (CIMS) must occupy a central role in GM projects: case study of the Africa Biofortified Sorghum (ABS) Project. In Biotechnology in Africa: Emergence, Initiatives and Future, ed. Wambugu, F. and Kamanga, D.. Basel: Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp. 225–241.Google Scholar

Ludlow, K. et al. (2013). Socio-economic Considerations in Biotechnology Regulation. Berlin: Springer Science and Business Media.Google Scholar

Marcoux, J.-M. et al. (2013). The inclusion of nonsafety criteria within the regulatory framework of agricultural biotechnology: exploring factors that are likely to influence policy transfer. Review of Policy Research 36(6), 657–684.Google Scholar

Mitre, M. and Reis, B. P. W. (2015). Science and politics in the regulation of genetically modified organisms in Brazil. Review of Policy Research 31(2), 125–147.Google Scholar

Morris, E. J. (1995). Biosafety regulations in South Africa. African Crop Science Journal 3(3), 303–307.Google Scholar

Morris, E. J. (2011). A semi-quantitative approach to GMO risk–benefit analysis. Transgenic Research 20(5), 1055–1061.Google Scholar

Morris, E. J. and Thomson, J. A. (2014). Genetically modified crops commercialized in South Africa. In Biotechnology in Africa: Emergence, Initiatives and Future, ed. Wambugu, F. and Kamanga, D.. Basel: Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp. 53–65.Google Scholar

Racovita, M. et al. (2013). Experiences in sub-Saharan Africa with GM crop risk communication. GM Crops & Food 4(1), 19–27.Google Scholar

Ramatha, L. and Andrew, J. (2012). Socio-economic aspects in decision-making in the context of the Biosafety Protocol: Malaysia's experience and case studies. Asian Biotechnology and Development Review 14(3), 19–30.Google Scholar

Sayre, R. et al. (2011). The BioCassava Plus program: biofortification of cassava for sub-Saharan Africa. Annual Reviews of Plant Biology 62, 251–272.Google Scholar

Siegrist, M. et al. (2016). Biased perception about gene technology: how perceived naturalness and affect distort benefit perception. Appetite 96, 509–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stein, A. J. et al. (2008). Genetic engineering for the poor: golden rice and public health in India. World Development 36(1), 144–158.Google Scholar

The Montpellier Panel (2013). Sustainable Intensification: A New Paradigm for African Agriculture, London.Google Scholar

USDA (2015). Malaysia Agricultural Biotechnology Annual 2015. Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN) Report Number MY5011. [Online]. Available from http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Kuala%20Lumpur_Malaysia_7-10-2015.pdfGoogle Scholar

Vigani, M. and Olper, A. (2013). GMO standards, endogenous policy and the market for information. Food Policy 43, 32–43.Google Scholar

Vigani, M. and Olper, A. (2015). Patterns and determinants of GMO regulations: an overview of recent evidence. AgBioForum 18(1), 44–54.Google Scholar

Wesseler, J. and Zilberman, D. (2014). The economic power of the Golden Rice opposition. Environment and Development Economics 19(6), 724–742.Google Scholar

Wolt, J. D. et al. (2016). The regulatory status of genome-edited crops. Plant Biotechnology Journal 14(2), 510–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

CFIA (2016). Canadian Food Inspection Agency Biology Documents. [Online]. Available from www.inspection.gc.ca/english/plaveg/bio/dir/biodoce.shtmlGoogle Scholar

Crawley, J. et al. (2001). Transgenic crops in natural habitats. Nature 409, 682–683.Google Scholar

García-Alonso, M. et al. (2014). Transportability of confined field trial data for environmental risk assessment of genetically engineered plants: a conceptual framework. Transgenic Research 23, 1025–1041.Google Scholar

Layton, R. et al. (2015). Building better environmental risk assessments. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 3, 110. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2015.00110Google Scholar

Mercer, K. L. et al. (2006). Effects of completion on the fitness of wild and crop-wild hybrid sunflower from a diversity of wild populations and crop lines. Evolution 60(10), 2044–2055.Google Scholar

NAS (1987). Introduction of Recombinant DNA Engineered Organisms into the Environment: Key Issues. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

Saurabh, S. et al. (2014). RNA interference: concept to reality in crop improvement. Planta 239(3), 543–564.Google Scholar

Schnell, J. et al. (2015). A comparative analysis of insertional effects in genetically engineered plants: considerations for pre-market assessments. Transgenic Research 24, 1–17.Google Scholar

Smyth, S. J. et al. (2011). Environmental impacts from herbicide tolerant canola production in Western Canada. Agricultural Systems 104(5), 403–410.Google Scholar

Union of Concerned Scientists (2013). ‘Superweeds’ resulting from Monsanto's products overrun U.S. farm landscape. [Online]. Available from www.ucsusa.org/news/press_release/superweeds-overrun-farmlands-0384.html#.WG0fmX1BkbUGoogle Scholar

Wozniak, C. and McHughen, A. (2012). Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology: The United States and Canada. Berlin: Springer Science and Business Media.Google Scholar

Adenle, A. A. et al. (2013). Status of development, regulation and adoption of GM agriculture in Africa: views and positions of stakeholder groups. Food Policy 43, 159–166.Google Scholar

African Union (2014). African Union Model Law on Biosafety, Art. 14: Identification and Labelling. Addis Ababa: African Union Commission, Department of Human Resources, Science and Technology.Google Scholar

Bansal, S. and Gruère, G. P. (2012). Implication of mandatory labelling of GM food in India. Evidence from the supply side. Food Policy 37(4), 467–472.Google Scholar

Bansal, S. and Gruère, G. P. (2015). Labelling GM food in India: anticipating the effects of GM-brinjal and rice marketing chains. AgBioForum 18(2), 156–167.Google Scholar

Bouet, A. et al. (2010). From ‘may contain’ to ‘does contain’: the price and trade effects of strict information requirements for GM maize under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Selected paper prepared for presentation at the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association's 2010 AAEA, CAES & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, 25–27 July, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar

Branquinho, M. R. et al. (2010). Survey of compliance with labelling legislation in food containing GMOs in Brazil. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 23(3), 220–225.Google Scholar

Carter, C. A. and Gruère, G. P. (2003). Mandatory labelling of genetically modified foods: does it really provide consumer choice? AgBioForum 6(1&2), 68–70.Google Scholar

Carter, C. A. et al. (2012). California's Proposition 37: effects of mandatory labeling of GM food. ARE Update 15(6), 3–8 (University of California Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics).Google Scholar

CAC (2011). Codex Alimentarius Commission compilation of Codex texts relevant to labelling of foods derived from modern biotechnology, CAC/GL 76–2011. [Online]. Available from www.codexalimentarius.org/standards/list-of-standards/en/Google Scholar

Chimhundu, H. (2002). Language Policies in Africa. Final report of the Intergovernmental Conference on Language Policies in Africa, revised version. UNESCO.Google Scholar

Convention on Biological Diversity (2000). Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Text and Annexes. [Online]. Available from www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cartagena-protocol-en.pdfGoogle Scholar

De Leon, A. et al. (2004). The cost implications of GM food labelling in the Philippines. Crop Biotech Brief 4, 2. [Online]. Available from www.isaaa.org/kc/Publications/pdfs/briefs/Brief4-2.pdfGoogle Scholar

Dubock, A. (2014). The politics of Golden Rice. GM Crops & Food 5(3), 210–222.Google Scholar

EC-JRC (2015). New guidelines to enhance GMO testing across the European Union. [Online]. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/news/new-guidelines-gmo-testing?searchGoogle Scholar

Falck-Zepeda, J. B. (2006). Coexistence, genetically modified biotechnologies and biosafety: implication for developing countries. American Journal of Agriculture Economics 88(5), 1200–1208.Google Scholar

Gallani, B. (2015). Labelling of genetically modified (GM) ingredients in foods and beverages. In Advances in Food and Beverages Labelling: Information and Regulations, ed. Berryman, P.. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 177–189.Google Scholar

Glowka, L. (2003). Law and Modern Biotechnology: Selected Issues of Relevance to Food and Agriculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, p. 44.Google Scholar

GMO-Compass (2007). Labelling of foodstuffs produced from animals – the discussion continues. [Online]. Available from www.gmo-compass.org/eng/news/stories/286.gmo_labelling_animal_products_discussion_continues.htmlGoogle Scholar

Gruère, G. P. et al. (2009). Explaining international differences in genetically modified food labelling policies. Review of International Economics 17(3), 393–408.Google Scholar

Gruère, G. P. and Rao, S. R. (2007). A review of international labelling policies of genetically modified food to evaluate India's proposed rule. AgBioForum 10(1), 51–64.Google Scholar

Huffman, W. E. and McCluskey, J. J. (2014). The economics of labelling of GM foods. AgBioForum 17(2), 156–160.Google Scholar

Jaftha, J. (2014). Guidelines on the role and functions of a biosafety committee (NBC) within a regulatory system – a case study from South Africa. In Biosafety in Africa: Experiences and Best Practices, ed. Keetch, D. P. et al. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar

Jansen van Rijssen, F. W. et al. (2015). The precautionary principle: making managerial decisions on GMOs is difficult. South African Journal of Science 111(3, 4), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenya (2012). The Biosafety Act (No. 2 of 2009), The Biosafety (Labelling) Regulations, 2012, Arrangements of Legislation, Legal Notice No. 40. [Online]. Available from www.biosafetykenya.go.ke/Docs/labelling.pdfGoogle Scholar

Kimani, V. and Gruère, G. (2010). Implication of import regulations and information requirements under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety for GM commodities in Kenya. AgBioForum 13(3), 222–241.Google Scholar

Mann, S. (2015). Is ‘GMO free’ an additional ‘organic’? On the economics of chain segregation. AgBioForum 18(1), 26–33.Google Scholar

Miller, H. I. and Kershen, D. I. (2011). A label we don't need. Nature Biotechnology 29(11), 971–972.Google Scholar

Morris, E. J. (2014). Biosafety regulatory systems in Africa. In Biosafety in Africa: Experiences and Best Practices, ed. Keetch, D. P. et al. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.Google Scholar

Namibia (2006). Biosafety Act (No. 7 of 2006), Government notice no. 3736.Google Scholar

OECD (1992). OECD Principles on Good Laboratory Practice, revised. [Online]. Available from www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/testing/goodlaboratorypracticeglp.htmGoogle Scholar

Oh, J. and Ezezika, O. C. (2014). To label or not to label: balancing the risks, benefits and costs of mandatory labelling of GM food in Africa. Agricultural and Food Security 3(8), 1–8.Google Scholar

Petrillo, M. et al. (2015). JRC GMO-Amplicons: a collection of nucleic acid sequences related to genetically modified organisms. [Online]. Available from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589694/Google Scholar

Plastina, A. and Giannakas, K. (2007). Market and welfare effects of GMO introduction in small open economies. AgBioForum 10(2), 104–123.Google Scholar

South Africa (2004). Foodstuffs, Cosmetics and Disinfectants Act (Act No. 54 of 1972). Regulations relating to labelling of foodstuffs obtained through certain techniques of genetic modification, Government Gazette No. 25,908, 16 January 2004.Google Scholar

South Africa (2011). Consumer Protection Act (Act No. 68 of 2008). Government Gazette 32186 (2009); 526; Regulations (R293, 1 April 2011), Government Gazette 34180 (2011); 550. [Online]. Available from www.thedti.gov.za/business_regulation/acts/consumer_protection.PDFGoogle Scholar

Trapman, S. M. et al. (2009). Guidance document on measurement uncertainty for GMO testing laboratories. European Commission Joint Research Centre. [Online]. Available from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC50052/101-2009_as%20published.pdfGoogle Scholar

UN (2003). United Nations Guidelines on Consumer Protection, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. [Online]. Available from http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/UN-DESA_GCP1999_en.pdfGoogle Scholar

UNCTAD (2013). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, United Nations Guidelines on Consumer Protection. [Online]. Available from http://unctad.org/en/Pages/DITC/CompetitionLaw/UN-Guidelines-on-Consumer-Protection.aspxGoogle Scholar

Varacca, A. et al. (2014). Economic aspects of segregation between GM and non-GM crops in Italy. AgBioForum 17(2), 123–132.Google Scholar

WTO (1995a). World Trade Organization, Uruguay Round Agreement: Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. [Online]. Available from www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/15sps_01_e.htmGoogle Scholar

WTO (1995b). World Trade Organization, Uruguay Round Agreement: Agreement on the Application of Technical Barriers to Trade. [Online]. Available from www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/17-tbt_e.htmGoogle Scholar

WTO (2011). The WTO and the FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius. [Online]. Available from www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/coher_e/wto_codex_e.htmGoogle Scholar

Brookes, G. and Barfoot, P. (2014). Economic impact of GM crops: The global income and production effects 1996–2012. GM Crops & Food 5(1), 65–75.Google Scholar

CBD (2010). Assessment and Review under Article 35 of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Discussion Paper on a Proposed Framework for the Second Assessment and Review. Report UNEP/CBD/BS/COP-MOP/5/15, 22 January 2010.Google Scholar

CBD (2013). Framework and Action Plan for Capacity-Building for the Effective Implementation of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (2012–2020).Google Scholar

Falck-Zepeda, J. et al., eds. (2013). Genetically Modified Crops in Africa: Economic and Policy Lessons from Countries South of the Sahara. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar

Johnston, S. et al. (2008). Internationally Funded Training in Biotechnology and Biosafety: Is It Bridging the Biotech Divide? Yokohama: UNU Institute of Advanced Studies.Google Scholar

Kitabu, G. (2014). Here comes drought-tolerant hybrid maize varieties. The Guardian, 17 January 2014. [Online]. Available from http://wema.aatf-africa.org/files/guardian-oikeh-interview.pdfGoogle Scholar

Klümper, W. and Qaim, M. (2014). A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops. PLoS ONE 9(11), e111629.Google Scholar

Maredia, K. et al. (2011). Capacity building in biosafety. In Environmental Safety of Genetically Engineered Crops, ed. Grumet, R. et al. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar

McLean, M. A. et al. (2002). A Conceptual Framework for Implementing Biosafety: Linking Policy, Capacity, and Regulation. Briefing Paper No. 47. The Hague: International Service for National Agricultural Research.Google Scholar

Pertry, I. et al. (2014). Biosafety capacity building: experiences and challenges from a distance learning approach. New Biotechnology 31(1), 64–68.Google Scholar

UNEP (2006). A Comparative Analysis of Experiences and Lessons from the UNEP-GEF Biosafety Projects. Geneva: UNEP-GEF Biosafety Unit.Google Scholar

UNEP (2008). Guidance towards Implementation of National Biosafety Frameworks: Lessons Learned from the UNEP Demonstration Projects. Geneva: UNEP-GEF Biosafety Unit.Google Scholar