Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T10:39:01.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Team-based Discussion on Preoperative Evaluation and Decision-making About Surgery

from Section 1 - Preoperative Evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2017

By
Suzanne Festen ,
Pauline de Graeff ,
Joanna A. Ijzerman  and
Barbara L. van Leeuwen
Edited by
Gabriella Bettelli
Gabriella Bettelli
Affiliation:
University of San Marino
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Perioperative Care of the Elderly
Clinical and Organizational Aspects
 , pp. 60 - 67
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Applegate, W.B., Blass, J.P., Williams, T.F. (1990). Instruments for the functional assessment of older patients. N Engl J Med. 322(17): 1207–1214.Google Scholar
Awdeh, H., Kassak, K., Sfeir, P., et al. (2015). The SF-36 and 6-minute walk test are significant predictors of complications after major surgery. World J Surg. 39(6): 1406–1412.Google Scholar
Brom, L., Pasman, H.R., Widdershoven, G.A., et al. (2014). Patients’ preferences for participation in treatment decision-making at the end of life: qualitative interviews with advanced cancer patients. PLoS One. 9(6): e100435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Case, S.M., Fried, T.R., O’Leary, J. (2013). How to ask: older adults’ preferred tools in health outcome prioritization. Patient Educ Couns. 91(1): 29–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coylewright, M., Palmer, R., O’Neill, E.S., Robb, J.F., Fried, T.R. (2015). Patient-defined goals for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a qualitative analysis. Health Expect. 19(5): 1036–1043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elkin, E.B., Kim, S.H., Casper, E.S., Kissane, D.W., Schrag, D. (2007). Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients’ preferences and their physicians’ perceptions. J Clin Oncol. 25(33): 5275–5280.Google Scholar
Fried, T.R. (2016). Shared decision making–finding the sweet spot. N Engl J Med. 374(2): 104–106.Google Scholar
Fried, T.R., Redding, C.A., Robbins, M.L., et al. (2012). Promoting advance care planning as health behavior change: Development of scales to assess decisional balance, medical and religious beliefs, and processes of change. Patient Educ Couns. 86(1): 25–32.Google Scholar
Huisman, M.G., van Leeuwen, B.L., Ugolini, G., et al. (2014). “Timed up & go”: a screening tool for predicting 30-day morbidity in onco-geriatric surgical patients? A multicenter cohort study. PLoS One. 9(1): e86863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACS NSQIP/AGS – American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Programs/American Geriatric Society. (2016). Optimal perioperative management of the geriatric patient: a best practices guideline from the AmericanCollege of Surgeons NSQIP and the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg. 222(5): 930–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paige, J.T. (2010). Surgical team training: promoting high reliability with nontechnical skills. Surg Clin N Am. 90: 569–581.Google Scholar
Stacey, D., Legare, F., Col, N.F., et al. (2014). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (1):CD001431.Google ScholarPubMed
Taylor, C., Finnegan-John, J., Green, J.S. (2014). “No decision about me without me” in the context of cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: a qualitative interview study. BMC Health Serv Res. 14: 488-014-0488-2.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×