Book contents
- The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics: The Legacy of Willi Hennig
- The Systematics Association
- The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- 1 Mission impossible: the childhood and youth of Willi Hennig
- 2 Willi Hennig: a shy man behind a scientific revolution
- 3 Willi Hennig’s legacy in the Nordic countries
- 4 Hennigian systematics in France, a historical approach with glimpses of sociology
- 5 Are we all cladists?
- 6 How much of Hennig is in present day cladistics?
- 7 The evolution of Willi Hennig’s phylogenetic considerations
- 8 What we all learned from Hennig
- 9 Semaphoronts: the elements of biological systematics
- 10 Why should cladograms be dichotomous?
- 11 Hennig’s auxiliary principle and reciprocal illumination revisited
- 12 Dispersalism and neodispersalism
- 13 Molecular data in systematics: a promise fulfilled, a future beckoning
- 14 Hennig, Løvtrup, evolution and biology
- 15 Willi Hennig as philosopher
- 16 Hennig and hierarchies
- 17 Chain, tree, and network: the development of phylogenetic systematics in the context of genealogical visualization and information graphics
- 18 The relational view of phylogenetic hypotheses and what it tells us on the phylogeny/classification relation problem
- 19 This struggle for survival: systematic biology and institutional leadership
- Index
- References
Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2016
Book contents
- The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics: The Legacy of Willi Hennig
- The Systematics Association
- The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- 1 Mission impossible: the childhood and youth of Willi Hennig
- 2 Willi Hennig: a shy man behind a scientific revolution
- 3 Willi Hennig’s legacy in the Nordic countries
- 4 Hennigian systematics in France, a historical approach with glimpses of sociology
- 5 Are we all cladists?
- 6 How much of Hennig is in present day cladistics?
- 7 The evolution of Willi Hennig’s phylogenetic considerations
- 8 What we all learned from Hennig
- 9 Semaphoronts: the elements of biological systematics
- 10 Why should cladograms be dichotomous?
- 11 Hennig’s auxiliary principle and reciprocal illumination revisited
- 12 Dispersalism and neodispersalism
- 13 Molecular data in systematics: a promise fulfilled, a future beckoning
- 14 Hennig, Løvtrup, evolution and biology
- 15 Willi Hennig as philosopher
- 16 Hennig and hierarchies
- 17 Chain, tree, and network: the development of phylogenetic systematics in the context of genealogical visualization and information graphics
- 18 The relational view of phylogenetic hypotheses and what it tells us on the phylogeny/classification relation problem
- 19 This struggle for survival: systematic biology and institutional leadership
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Future of Phylogenetic SystematicsThe Legacy of Willi Hennig, pp. 1 - 9Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Andersen, N.M. (2001). The impact of W. Hennig’s ‘phylogenetic systematics’ on contemporary entomology. European Journal of Entomology, 98, 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, D.A. and Smith, S.D. (2012). Tree Thinking: An Introduction to Phylogenetic Biology. Greenwood Village, CO: Roberts and Co.Google Scholar
Brundin, L. (1966). Transarctic relationships and their significance, as evidenced by chironomid midges. With a monograph of the subfamilies Podonominae and Aphroteniinae and the Austral Heptagyiae. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar, Fjärde series, 11, 1–472.Google Scholar
Ebach, M.C., Williams, D.M. and Vanderlaan, T.A. (2013). Implementation as theory, hierarchy as transformation, homology as synapomorphy. Zootaxa, 3641, 587–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engel, M.S. and Kristensen, N.P. (2013). A history of entomological classification. Annual Review of Entomology, 58, 585–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farris, J.S. (1988). Hennig86 version 1.5. Computer program and manual, published by the author.Google Scholar
Forey, P.L., Humphries, C.J., Kitching, I.J., et al. (1992). Cladistics: A Practical Course in Systematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenwood, P.H., Miles, R.S., and Patterson, C. (ed.) (1973). Interrelationships of Fishes. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Guillé, G.C. (2015). El neuvo esquema expositivo del Museo de Historia Natural de Londres, 1968–1981. Una perspectiva histórica. Thesis doctoral. Centro de Estudios de Historia de la Cienca.Google Scholar
Haeckel, E. (1866). Generelle Morphologie der Organismen: Allgemeine Grundzüge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, mechanisch begründet durch die von C. Darwin reformirte Decendenz-Theorie. Berlin: Reimer. 2 volumes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A. (ed.) (2014). The Evolution of Phylogenetic Systematics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. (1848–1952). Die Larvenformen der Dipteren (Teil 1, 1948; Teil 2, 1950; Teil 3, 1952). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. (1950). Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Berlin: Deutsche Zentralverlag. [Reprinted 1980 Koenigstein: Otto Koeltz.]Google Scholar
Hennig, W. (1953). Kritische Bermerkungen zum phylogenetischen System der Insekten. Beiträge zur Entomologie, 3, 1–85.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. (1960). Die Dipteren-Fauna von Neuseeland als systematisches und tiergeographisches Problem. Beiträge zur Entomologie, 10, 221–239.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. (1965). Phylogenetic systematics. Annual Review of Entomology, 10, 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennig, W. (1966a). Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. [Reprinted 1979, 1999.]Google Scholar
Hennig, W. (1966b). The Diptera fauna of New Zealand as a problem in systematics and zoogeography. Pacific Insects Monograph, 9, 81 pp. [Translation of Hennig 1960, with additional footnotes.]Google Scholar
Heywood, V.H. (1964). Introduction. In Phenetic and Phylogenetic Classification. A Symposium, ed. Heywood, V.H. and McNeill, J.. London: Systematics Association. Publication no. 6, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Heywood, V.H. and McNeill, J. (ed.) (1964). Phenetic and Phylogenetic Classification. A Symposium, London: Systematics Association. Publication no. 6.Google Scholar
Hull, D.L. (1988). Science as Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joysey, K.A. and Friday, A.E. (ed.) (1982). Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kitching, I., Forey, P.L., Humphries, C.J. and Williams, D.M. (1998). Cladistics: The Theory and Practice of Parsimony Analysis, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meier, R. (2005). Role of dipterology in phylogenetic systematics: the insight of Willi Hennig. In The Evolutionary Biology of Flies, ed. Yeates, D.K. and Weigmann, B.M.. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 45–62.Google Scholar
Nelson, G.J. and Platnick, N.I. (1981). Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and vicariance. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. (2011). Resemblance as evidence of ancestry. Zootaxa, 2946, 137–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, G. (2014). Cladistics at an earlier time. In The Evolution of Phylogenetic Systematics, ed. Hamilton, A.. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 139–149.Google Scholar
Patterson, C. (ed.) (1982). Problems in phylogenetic reconstruction. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 74, 197–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, C. (2011). Adventures in the fish trade [edited and with an introduction by David M. Williams and Anthony C. Gill]. Zootaxa, 2946, 118–136.Google Scholar
Pietsch, T.W. (2010). Trees of Life: A Visual History. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, D.E., Nelson, G. and Patterson, C.. (1979). Foreword. In Phylogenetic Systematics, ed.Hennig, W.. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. vii–xiii.Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. (2013). From Taxonomy to Phylogenetics: Life and Work of Willi Hennig. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuh, R.T. and Brower, A.V.Z. (2009). Biological Systematics: Principles and Applications, 2nd edition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schultze, H.-P. (2005). The first ten symposia on early/lower vertebrates. Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia, 8, v–xviii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G.G. (1961). Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, R.W., Price, J.H. and Whalley, P.E.S. (1983). Evolution, Time and Space: The Emergence of the Biosphere. Systematic Association Special Volume 38. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Vanderlaan, T.A., Ebach, M.C. and Williams, D.M. (2014). Defining and redefining monophyly: Haeckel, Hennig, Ashlock, Nelson and the proliferation of definitions. Australian Systematic Botany, 26, 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wägele, J.-W. (2005). Foundations of Phylogenetic Systematics. Munich: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.Google Scholar
Wanntorp, H.-E. (1993). Lars Brundin 30 May 1907–17 November 1993. Cladistics, 9, 357–367.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Q.D. (1995). The ‘Old Systematics’: classification and phylogeny. In Biology, Phylogeny and Classification of Coleoptera: Papers Celebrating the 80th Birthday of Roy A. Crowson, ed. Pakaluk, J. and Slipinski, S.A.. Warsaw: Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN, pp. 31–62.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W.C. (2012). Systematics: A Course of Lectures. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, E.O. and Lieberman, B.S. (2011). Phylogenetics: Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. Hoboken, NJ: John A. Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, J.S. and Ebach, M.C. (2014). The Nature of Classification: Relationships and Kinds in the Natural Sciences. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D.M and Ebach, M.C. (2008). The Foundations of Systematics and Biogeography. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D.M. and Ebach, M.C. (2009). What, exactly, is cladistics? Re-writing the history of systematics and biogeography. Acta Biotheoretica, 57, 249–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed