Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T22:01:06.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Hennig and hierarchies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2016

By
Charissa S. Varma
Edited by
David Williams ,
Michael Schmitt  and
Quentin Wheeler
David Williams
Affiliation:
Natural History Museum, London
Michael Schmitt
Affiliation:
Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald, Germany
Quentin Wheeler
Affiliation:
State University of New York
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics
The Legacy of Willi Hennig
 , pp. 377 - 409
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, O. (1909). Was verstehen wir unter monophyletischer und polyphyletischer Abstammung? Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, 59, 243–256.Google Scholar
Bertalanffy, L. von. (1928). Kritische Theorie der Formbildung, Abhandlungen zur theoretischen, Abhandlungen zur theoretischen Biologie, hrsg. v. Julius Schaxel, Heft 27, Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger [English translation: Modern Theories of Development. An Introduction to Theoretical Biology, Oxford: Clarendon, 1933; New York: Harper Torchbooks 1962).Google Scholar
Bertalanffy, L.von. (1932). Theoretische Biologie: Band I: Allgemeine Theorie, Physikochemie, Aufbau und Entwicklung des Organismus. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger.Google Scholar
Bertalanffy, L.von. (1942). Theoretische Biologie: Band II: Stoffwechsel, Wachstum. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger.Google Scholar
Bigelow, R.S. (1956). Monophyletic classification and evolution. Systematic Zoology, 5, 145–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigelow, R. S. (1958). Classification and phylogeny. Systematic Zoology, 7, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwelder, R.E. (1959). The functions and limitations of classification. Systematic Zoology, 8, 202–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breidbach, O. (2003). Post-Haeckelian comparative biology–Adolf Naef’s idealistic morphology. Theory in Biosciences, 122, 174–193.Google Scholar
Brundin, L. (1966). Transantarctic relationships and their significance, as evidenced by chironomid midges, with a monograph of the subfamilies Podonominae and Aphroteniinae and the Austral Heptagyiae. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar, Fjerde Serien, 1(1): 1–472.Google Scholar
Brundin, L.Z. (1972). Evolution, causal biology, and classification. Zoologica Scripta, 1, 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burma, B.H. (1949). The species concept: a discussion. The species concept: a semantic review. Evolution, 3, 369–370 [Postscript: 372–373].Google Scholar
Collingwood, R.G. (1945). The Idea of Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Donoghue, M.J. and Kadereit, J.W. (1992). Walter Zimmermann and the growth of phylogenetic theory. Systematic Biology, 41, 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghiselin, M.T. (1966a). An application of the theory of definitions to systematic principles. Systematic Zoology, 15, 127–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghiselin, M.T. (1966b). On psychologism in the logic of taxonomic controversies. Systematic Zoology. 26, 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghiselin, M.T. (1967). Further remarks on logical errors in systematic theory. Systematic Zoology, 16, 347–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghiselin, M.T. (1969). The Triumph of the Darwinian Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M.T. (1974). A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology, 23, 536–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, J.R. (1950). Taxonomy, language and reality. The American Naturalist, 84, 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, J.R. (1954). The Language of Taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldane, J.S. (1931). The Philosophical Basis of Biology. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Haldane, J.S. (1935). The Philosophy of a Biologist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Handlirsch, A. (1925). Die Systematischen Grundbegriffe. In Handbuch der Entomologie, Band III., ed. Schröder, C. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. (1936). Beziehungen zwischen geographischer Verbreitung und systematischer Gliederung bei einigen Dipterenfamilien: ein Beitrag zum Problem der Gliederung systematischer Kategorien höherer Ordnung. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 116, 161–175.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. (1943). Ein Beitrag zum Problem der Beziehungen zwischen Larven-und Imaginalsystematik. Arbeiten Morph. Taxon. Entomol. (Berlin), 10, 138–145.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. (1947). Probleme der biologischen Systematik. Forschungen und Fortschritte 21⁄23, 276–279.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. (1949). Zur Klärung einiger Begriffe der phylogenetischen Systematik. Forschungen und Fortschritte 25, 137–139.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. (1950). Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Berlin: Deutscher ZentralverlagGoogle Scholar
Hennig, W. (1953). Kritische Bemerkungen zum phylogenetischen System der Insekten. Beiträge zur Entomologie, 3, Sonderheft Festschrift Sachtleben: 1–85.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. (1957). Systematik und Phylogenese. In Bericht über die Hundertjahrfeier der Deutschen Entomologischen Gesellschaft Berlin, ed. Hannemann, H. –J.. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, pp. 50–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennig, W. (1966). Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. (1982). Phylogenetische Systematik. Berlin: Paul Parey.Google Scholar
Hueck, W. (1926). Die Synthesiologie von Martin Heidenhain als Versuch einer allgemeinen Theorie der Organisation. Naturwissenschaften, 14, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D.L. (1964). Consistency and monophyly. Systematic Zoology, 13, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D.L. (1965). The effect of essentialism on taxonomy: two thousand years of stasis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15: 314–326, 16, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D.L. (1967). The metaphysics of evolution. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 3, 309–37.Google Scholar
Hull, D.L. (1976). Are species really individuals? Systematic Zoology, 25, 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D.L. (1978). A matter of individuality. Philosophy of Science, 45, 335–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D.L. (1988). Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D.L. (1990). The descriptive attitude: transformed cladistics, taxonomy and evolution by N.R. Scott-Ram. Systematic Zoology, 39, 420–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, N. (1969). A logical basis for biological classification. Systematic Zoology, 18, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, E.B. (1998). The use of hierarchies as organizational models in systematics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 63, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr, E. (1949). The Species Concept: A discussion. The species concept: Semantic verses semantics. Evolution, 3, 371–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1987). The ontological status of species: Scientific progress and philosophical terminology. Biology and Philosophy, 2, 145–166.Google Scholar
Michener, C.D. (1957). Some bases for higher categories in classification. Systematic Zoology, 6, 160–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieppel, O. (2003). Semaphoronts, cladograms and the roots of total evidence. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 80, 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieppel, O. (2006). On concept formation in systematics. Cladistics, 22, 474–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieppel, O. (2009). Hennig’s enkaptic system. Cladistics, 25, 311–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rieppel, O. (2011). Willi Hennig’s dichotomization of nature. Cladistics, 27, 103–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rieppel, O. (2012). Adolf Naef (1883–1949), systematic morphology and phylogenetics. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 50, 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, M. (2003). Willi Hennig and the rise of cladistics. In New Panorama of Animal Evolution, ed. A. Legakis, S. Stenthourakis, R. Polymeni and M. Thessalou-Legaki. Sofia: Pensoft Publishers, pp. 369—379.Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. (2010). Willi Hennig, the cautious revolutioniser. Palaeodiversity 3, Supplement, 3–9.Google Scholar
Simpson, G.G. (1951). The species concept. Evolution, 5, 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G.G. (1961). Principles of Animal Taxonomy New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R.R., and Sneath, P.H.A. (1963). Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. London: W.H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
Torrey, T.W. (1939). Organisms in time. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 14, 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D.M., Scotland, R.W., Humphries, C.J. and Siebert, D.J. (1996). Confusion in philosophy: a comment on Williams (1992). Synthese, 108, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, P.A. (1992). Confusion in Cladism. Synthese, 91, 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodger, J.H. (1929). Biological Principles. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
Woodger, J.H. (1930). The ‘concept of organism’ and the relation between embryology and genetics. Part I. Quarterly Review of Biology, 5, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodger, J.H. (1932). The ‘concept of organism’ and the relation between embryology and genetics. Part III. Quarterly Review of Biology, 6, 178–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodger, J.H. (1937). The Axiomatic Method in Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woodger, J.H. (1945). On biological transformations. In Essays on Growth and Form, presented to D’ Arcy Wentworth Thompson, ed. Le Gros Clark, W.E. and Medawar, P.B., Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 95–120.Google Scholar
Woodger, J.H. (1952). From biology to mathematics. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 3, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, W. (1931). Arbeitsweise der botanischen Phylogenetik und anderer Gruppierungswissenschaften. In Handbuch der biologischen Arbeitsmethoden, Abteilung IX: Methoden zur Erforschung der Leistungen des tierischen Organismus, Teil 3: Methoden der Vererbungsforschung, Heft 6 (Lieferung 356), ed. Abderhalden, E.. Berlin: Urban and Schwarzenberg, 941–1053.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×