Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T17:24:52.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 20 - Obstetric Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

A. Agatha Crerar-Gilbert
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital, London
Mark MacGregor
Affiliation:
Ashford and St Peter’s Hospital Trust
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy. Committee Opinion No. 474. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 420–1.Google Scholar
Armstrong, S, Fernando, R, Ashpole, K, Simons, R, Columb, M. Assessment of coagulation in the obstetric population using ROTEM® thromboelastometry. Int J Obstet Anesth 2011; 20: 293–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, EN, Gift, HC, Brown, BW, et al. Occupational disease in dentistry and chronic exposure to trace anesthetic gases. J Am Dent Assoc 1980; 101: 2131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen-Kerem, R, Railton, C, Oren, D, Lishner, M, Koren, G. Pregnancy outcome following non-obstetric surgical intervention. Am J Surg 2005; 190: 467–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, FG. Normal reference ranges for laboratory values in pregnancy, 2014. www.uptodate.com/contents/normal-reference-ranges-for-laboratory-values-in-pregnancy (accessed 19 May 2015).Google Scholar
Erekson, EA, Brousseau, EC, Dick-Biascoechea, MA, Ciarleglio, MM, Lockwood, CJ, Pettker, CM. Maternal postoperative complications after nonobstetric antenatal surgery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 2639–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunderson, EP, Chiang, V, Lewis, CE, et al. Long-term blood pressure changes measured from before to after pregnancy relative to nonparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 1294–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hande, MP, Devi, PU. Teratogenic effects of repeated exposures to X-rays and/or ultrasound in mice. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1995; 17: 179–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinrichs, WL, Fong, P, Flannery, M, et al. Midgestational exposure of pregnant balb/c mice to magnetic resonance imaging. Mag Res Imag 1986; 8: 65–9.Google Scholar
Hunter, S, Robson, SC. Adaptation of the maternal heart in pregnancy. Br Heart J 1992; 68: 540–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Committee on Non-ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Medical Magnetic Resonance Procedures: Protection of patients. Health Phys 2004; 87: 197216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, O, Sporrong, T, Hillarp, A, Jeppsson, A, Hellgren, M. Prospective longitudinal study of thromboelastography and standard hemostatic laboratory tests in healthy women during normal pregnancy. Anesth Analg 2012; 115: 890–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kort, B, Katz, VL, Watson, WJ. The effect of nonobstetric operation during pregnancy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993; 177: 371–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Lowe, SA. Diagnostic radiography in pregnancy: risks and reality. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 44: 191–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macafee, B, Campbell, JP, Ashpole, K, et al. Reference ranges for thromboelastography (TEG®) and traditional coagulation tests in term parturients undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 741–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazze, RI, Kallen, B. Reproductive outcome after anaesthesia and operation during pregnancy: a registry study of 5405 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1178–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazze, RI, Wilson, AI, Rice, SA, Baden, JM. Reproduction and fetal development in rats exposed to nitrous oxide. Teratology 1984; 30: 259–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, MW, Nyborg, WL, Dewey, WC, et al. Hyperthermic teratogenicity, thermal dose and diagnostic ultrasound during pregnancy: implications of new standards on tissue heating. Int J Hyperthermia 2002; 18: 361–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, AC, Milne, D, Columb, M, Gorton, H, Knight, M. Failed tracheal intubation in obstetric anaesthesia: 2 yr national case-control study in the UK. Br J Anaesth 2013; 110: 7480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reitman, E, Flood, P. Anaesthetic considerations for non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107 Suppl. 1: i728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, DK, Cohen, MM. The incidence of airway problems depends on the definition used. Can J Anaesth 1996; 43: 30–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samsoon, GL, Young, JR. Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study. Anaesthesia 1987; 42: 487–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silvestri, MT, Pettker, CM, Brousseau, EC, Dick, MA, Ciarleglio, MM, Erekson, EA. Morbidity of appendectomy and cholecystectomy in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 1261–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szecsi, PB, Jørgensen, M, Klajnbard, A, Andersen, MR, Colov, NP, Stender, S. Haemostatic reference intervals in pregnancy. Thromb Haemost 2010; 103: 718–27.Google ScholarPubMed
Tso, G, Lee, J, Lui, G, Trivedi, H, Cohen, M, Bernstein, P, Taub, C. Range of echocardiographic parameters during normal pregnancy. Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: E1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyndall, DA, Sulik, KK. Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on eye development in the C57BL/6 J mouse. Teratology 1991; 43: 263–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentin, J. Pregnancy and medical radiation. ICRP Publication 84. Ann ICRP 2000; 30: 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waugh, JJ, Clark, TJ, Divakaran, TG, Khan, KS, Kilby, MD. Accuracy of urinalysis dipstick techniques in predicting significant proteinuria in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 769–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, M, Morganti, AA, Zervoudakis, I, et al. Blood pressure, the renin-aldosterone system and sex steroids throughout normal pregnancy. Am J Med 1980; 68: 97104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×