Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T11:31:05.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 22 - Austere Obstetric Anesthesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2020

By
Johanna de Haan ,
Kristin Falce  and
Nadia Hernandez
Edited by
Joseph McIsaac
Edited in association with
Kelly McQueen  and
Corry Kucik
Joseph McIsaac
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Kelly McQueen
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
Corry Kucik
Affiliation:
United States Navy
Get access

Summary

Situations of disaster, whether due to natural disaster or man-made disaster, are non-discriminatory. All individuals are affected equally, whether male or female, young or old. Persons who are providing medical care in an area affected by disaster may come across patients who are pregnant and in need of urgent care. Obstetric care along with injury-related care is considered among the forefront of necessary surgical services in disaster situations. The need for anesthetic care is recognized as an integral component of these hospital services.

Type
Chapter
Information
Essentials of Disaster Anesthesia , pp. 207 - 212
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdullah, F, Troedsson, H, Cherian, M. The World Health Organization program for emergency surgical, obstetric, and anesthetic care: from Mongolia to the future. Arch Surg 2011;146(5):620–623.Google Scholar
SOAP. Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology (SOAP) advisory in response to shortages of local anesthetics in North America. https://soap.org/2018-bupivacaine-shortage-statement.pdf (accessed September 2019).Google Scholar
Parpaglioni, R, Frigo, MG, Lemma, A, et al. Minimum local anaesthetic dose (MLAD) of intrathecal levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for Cesarean section. Anaesthesia 2006;61:110–115.Google Scholar
Polley, LS, Columb, MO, Naughton, NN, Wagner, DS, van de Ven, CJ. Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor: implications for therapeutic indexes. Anesthesiology 1999;90(4):944–950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chau, A, Bibbo, C, Huang, CC, et al. Dural puncture epidural technique improves labor analgesia quality with fewer side effects compared with epidural and compared spinal epidural techniques: a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Analg 2017;124(2):560–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vuong, JT, McQuillan, PM, Messaris, E, Adhikary, SD.Transversus abdominus plane block as the primary anesthetic for laparotomy. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2014;30(3): 419–421.Google Scholar
Mahawar, B, Baduni, N, Bansal, P. Cesarean section under local anesthesia: a step forward or backward? J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2014;30(4):578–579.Google ScholarPubMed
ACOG. Obstetric analgesia and anesthesia. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 36. July 2002.Google Scholar
Kent, S, Mehaffey, G. Transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of postdural puncture headache in obstetric patients. J Clin Anesth 2016;34:194–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, S, Sakr, A, Katyal, S, Chopra, D. Sphenopalatine ganglion block for postdural puncture headache. Anaesthesia 2009;64:570–579.Google Scholar
ASA/SOAP. Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology 2015;124(2):1–31.Google Scholar
Columb, M, Lyons, G. Determination of the minimum local anesthetic concentrations of epidural bupivacaine and lidocaine in labor. Anesth Analg 1995;81:833–837.Google ScholarPubMed
Franchini, M, Mengoli, C, Cruciani, M, et al. Safety and efficacy of tranexamic acid for prevention of obstetric haemorrhage: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood Transfus 2018;16:329–337.Google ScholarPubMed
Daniels, K, Oakeson, AM, Hilton, G. Steps toward a national disaster plan for obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:154–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×