Works cited
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2015
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Naturalism and Realism in Kant's Ethics , pp. 250 - 257Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Works cited
Abela, Paul. 2002a. Kant’s Empirical Realism. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abela, Paul. 2002b. “Kantian Walls and Bridges: Challenging the Integrationist Model of the Relation of Theoretical and Practical Reason.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10(4): 591–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adickes, Erich. 1927. Kant Und Die Als-Ob-Philosophie. Stuttgart: Fr. Frommans Verlag (H. Kurtz).Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. 1986. “Morality and Freedom: Kant’s Reciprocity Thesis.” The Philosophical Review 95(3): 393–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. 1990. Kant’s Theory of Freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. 1996. Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant’s Theoretical and Practical Philosophy. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. 1997. “We Can Act Only Under the Idea of Freedom.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 71(2): 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. 2004. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. Revised and Enlarged Edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. 2007. “Comments on Guyer.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50(5): 480–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. 2011. Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. 2012. Essays on Kant. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Almeida, Guido Antonio. 2012. “Critique, Deduction, and Fact of Reason.” In Kant in Brazil, North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy, edited by Rauscher, Frederick and Perez, Daniel Omar. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, pp. 127–54.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. 1982. Kant’s Theory of Mind: An Analysis of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl. 2003. Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagnoli, Carla. 2011. “Constructivism in Metaethics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/constructivism-metaethics/ (April 1, 2013).Google Scholar
Bagnoli, Carla. 2012. “Kant’s Contribution to Moral Epistemology.” Paradigmi: Rivista di critica filosofica, pp. 69–79.Google Scholar
Bagnoli, Carla. 2014. “Starting Points: Kantian Constructivism Reassessed.” Ratio Juris 27: 311–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Lewis White. 1960. A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White. 1987. “Five Concepts of Freedom in Kant.” In Philosophical Analysis and Reconstruction: A Festschrift for Stephan Körner, edited by Srzednicki, Jan T. J.. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Lewis White. 2002. “The Fact of Reason: An Essay on Justification in Ethics.” In Selected Essays on Kant, North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy, edited by Robinson, Hoke. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, pp. 45–56.Google Scholar
Bell, David. 2001. “Is Empirical Realism Compatible with Transcendental Idealism?” In Idealismus als Theorie der Repräsentation?, edited by Schumacher, Ralph and Scholz, Oliver. Paderborn: Mentis Verlag, pp. 167–79.Google Scholar
Bird, Graham. 1995. “Kant and Naturalism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3(2): 399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Graham. 2006. The Revolutionary Kant: A Commentary on the Critique of Pure Reason. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Bojanowski, Jochen. 2012. “Is Kant a Moral Realist?” In Kant and Contemporary Moral Philosophy, Kant Yearbook, edited by Heidemann, Dieter. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
De Caro, Mario, and Macarthur, David, eds. 2004. Naturalism in Question. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
De Caro, Mario, and Macarthur, David, eds. 2010. Naturalism and Normativity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew. 2007. “Belief in Kant.” Philosophical Review 116(3): 323–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Arthur W. 1999. Possible Experience: Understanding Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cummiskey, David. 1996. Kantian Consequentialism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dall’Agnol, Darlei. 2012a. “On the Factum of Reason.” In Kant in Brazil, North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy, edited by Rauscher, Frederick and Perez, Daniel Omar. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, pp. 109–26.Google Scholar
Dall’Agnol, Darlei. 2012b. “The Idealist Interpretation of Kant’s Metaethics.” In Investigações Kantianas I: Um Debate Plural, edited by Tonetto, Milene Consenso, Pinzani, Alessandro, and Dall’Agnol, Darlei. Florianopolis, Brazil: FUNJAB, pp. 11–29.Google Scholar
Dall’Agnol, Darlei. 2013. “Was Kant a Naturalist? Further Reflections on Rauscher’s Idealist Meta-ethics.” Studia Kantiana 14: 142–59.Google Scholar
Davidovich, Adina. 1993. Religion as a Province of Meaning: The Kantian Foundations of Modern Theology. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress.Google Scholar
Dean, Richard. 2006. The Value of Humanity in Kant’s Moral Theory. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, Lara. 2003. “Kant’s Criticisms of Atheism.” Kant-Studien: Philosophische Zeitschrift der Kant-Gesellschaft 94(2): 198–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dye, James Wayne. 1978. “Kant as Ethical Naturalist.” Journal of Value Inquiry 12: 111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteves, Julio. 2012. “The Non-Circular Deduction of the Categorical Imperative in Groundwork III.” In Kant in Brazil, North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy, edited by Rauscher, Frederick and Perez, Daniel Omar. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, pp. 155–72.Google Scholar
Falkenburg, Brigitte. 2004. “Kants Naturalismus-Kritik.” In Warum Kant Heute?, edited by Heidemann, Dietmar and Engelhard, Kristina. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 177–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feder, Johann Georg Heinrich. 1769. Grundriß Der Philosophischen Wissenschaften Nebst Der Nöthigen Geschichte, Zum Gebrauche Seiner Zuhörer. second. Coberg: Findeisen.Google Scholar
Formosa, Paul. 2013. “Is Kant a Moral Constructivist or a Moral Realist?” European Journal of Philosophy 21: 170–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, Eckart. 1989. Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three Critiques and the Opus Postumum. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, Eckart. 2000. Kant’s Final Synthesis: An Essay on the Opus Postumum. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 1997. “Philosophical Naturalism.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 71: 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Patrick. 2003. Freedom and Anthropology in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Patrick. 2005. “Kant’s Empirical Account of Human Action.” Philosophers’ Imprint 5(7): 1–34.Google Scholar
Fugate, Courtney D. 2012. “On a Supposed Solution to the Reinhold/Sidgwick Problem in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals.” European Journal of Philosophy. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2012.00531.x/abstract (August 12, 2013).Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 1998. “The Value of Reason and the Value of Freedom.” Ethics 109(1): 22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2000. Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2007a. Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Reader’s Guide. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2007b. “Naturalistic and Transcendental Moments in Kant’s Moral Philosophy.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50(5): 444–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. 2009. “Problems with Freedom: Kant’s Argument in Groundwork III and Its Subsequent Emendations.” In Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, edited by Timmermann, Jens. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.176–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, Robert. 2001. Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hare, John. 1996. The Moral Gap: Kantian Ethics, Human Limits, and God’s Assistance. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hare, John. 2001 God’s Call: Moral Realism, God’s Commands, and Human Autonomy. Grand Rapids: William B Eerdmans Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. 1975. “Die Deduktion Des Sittengesetzes: Über Die Gründe Der Dunkelheit Des Letzten Abschnittes von Kants ‘Grundlegung Zur Metaphysik Der Sitten’.” In Denken im Schatten des Nihilismus: Festschrift für Wilhelm Weischedel, edited by Schwan, Alexander. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. 1994. “The Concept of Moral Insight and Kant’s Doctrine of the Fact of Reason.” In The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant’s Philosophy, edited by Velkley, Richard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 55–87.Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. 1989. “Kantian Constructivism in Ethics.” Ethics 99(4): 752–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Thomas E. 2012. Virtue, Rules, and Justice: Kantian Aspirations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höffe, Otfried. 2010. Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: The Foundation of Modern Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Hussain, Nadeem, and Shah, Nishi. 2006. “Misunderstanding Metaethics: Korsgaard’s Rejection of Realism.” Oxford Studies in Metaethics 1(2006): 265–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutter, Axel. 2003. Das Interesse Der Vernunft: Kants Ursprüngliche Einsichtund Ihre Entfaltung in Den Transzendentalphilosophischen Hauptwerken. Hamburg: F. Meiner.Google Scholar
Johnson, Robert N. 2007. “Value and Autonomy in Kantian Ethics.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, edited by Shafer-Landau, Russ. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 133–48.Google Scholar
Kain, Patrick. 2004. “Self-legislation in Kant’s Moral Philosophy.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86(3): 257–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kain, Patrick. 2005. “Interpreting Kant’s Theory of Divine Commands.” Kantian Review 9(1): 128–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kain, Patrick. 2006. “Realism and Anti-Realism in Kant’s Second Critique.” Philosophy Compass 1(5): 449–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2009. Fundamenação Da Metafísica Dos Costumes. translated and edited by de Almeida, Guido Antonio. São Paulo: Discurso Editorial.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Alexander. 2012. “Rawls and Kantian Constructivism.” Kantian Review 17(02): 227–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kielkopf, Charles F. 1997. A Kantian Condemnation of Atheistic Despair: A Declaration of Dependence. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kinnaman, Ted. 2008. “Kant’s Nonfoundationalist Grounding of Reason.” In Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants: Akten des X Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Band 5, edited by Rohden, Valerio, Terra, Ricardo, de Almeida, Guido, and Ruffing, Margit. Berlin: Walter deGruyter, pp. 343–52.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1993. “The Evolution of Human Altruism.” The Journal of Philosophy 90: 497–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. 1998. “The Conative Character of Reason in Kant’s Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 36(1): 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. 2010. “Moral Consciousness and the Fact of Reason.” In Kant’s “Critique of Practical Reason”: A Critical Guide, edited by Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. 1989. “Personal Identity and the Unity of Agency: A Kantian Response to Parfit.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 18(2): 101–32.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. 1996a. Creating the Kingdom of Ends. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. 1996b. The Sources of Normativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. 2003. “Realism and Constructivism in Twentieth-century Moral Philosophy.” Journal of Philosophical Research 28: 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. 2008. The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasnoff, Larry. 1999. “How Kantian Is Constructivism?” Kant-Studien 90(4): 385–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred. 2001. Kant: A Biography. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loparic, Zeljko. 2005. A Semântica Transcendental de Kant. 3rd ed. Campinas, Brazil: Coleção CLE.Google Scholar
Louden, Robert B. 2000. Kant’s Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchester, Paula. 2008. “Kant’s Conception of Architectonic in Its Philosophical Context.” Kantstudien 99: 133–51.Google Scholar
Meerbote, Ralf. 1984. “Kant on the Nondeterminate Character of Human Actions.” In Kant on Causality, Freedom, and Objectivity, edited by Meerbote, Ralf and Harper, William. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 138–63.Google Scholar
Mieth, Corinna, and Rosenthal, Jacob. 2006. “‘Freedom Must Be Presupposed as a Property of All Rational Beings’.” In Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, edited by Horn, Christoph, Schönecker, Dieter, and Mieth, Corinna. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 247–84.Google Scholar
Naragon, Steve. 2006. Kant in the Classroom. www.manchester.edu/kant/Home/index.htm (July 14, 2014).Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora. 1989. Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora. 2002. “Constructivism in Rawls and Kant.” In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, edited by Freeman, Samuel. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 347–67.Google Scholar
Pierce, Drew. 2004. “Kant e a Justifição das Crenças Morais.” Impulso Piracicaba 15: 35–46.Google Scholar
Pihlström, Sami. 2001. “Naturalism, Transcendental Conditions, and the Self-Discipline of Philosophical Reason.” Journal of Speculative Philosophy: A Quarterly Journal of History 15: 228–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pihlström, Sami. 2004. “Recent Reinterpretations of the Transcendental.” Inquiry 47: 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin. 2013. “Naturalism and Kant’s Resolution of the Third Antinomy”. In Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht, Akten des XI Kant-Kongresses 2010, edited by Bacin, Stefano, Ferrarin, Alfredo, La Rocca, Claudio, and Ruffing, Margit. Berlin. Band 2: 731–42.Google Scholar
Proops, Ian. 2003. “Kant’s Legal Metaphor and the Nature of a Deduction.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 41: 209–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauscher, Frederick. 1998. “Kant’s Two Priorities of Practical Reason.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6(3): 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauscher, Frederick. 2002. “Kant’s Moral Anti-Realism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 40: 477–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauscher, Frederick. 2006a. “Razão Prática Pura Como Uma Faculdade Natural.” Ethic@ https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/issue/view/1453. 5: 173–92.Google Scholar
Rauscher, Frederick. 2006b. “Reason as a Natural Cause.” In Moralische Motivation. Kant und die Alternativen, Forschungen, Kant, edited by Klemme, Heiner, Kühn, Manfred, and Schönecker, Dieter. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, pp. 97–110.Google Scholar
Rauscher, Frederick. 2007. “‘God’ Without God: Kant’s Postulate.” Kant e-Prints 2: 27–62.Google Scholar
Rauscher, Frederick. 2009a. “Freedom and Reason in Groundwork III.” In Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, edited by Timmermann, Jens. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 203–23.Google Scholar
Rauscher, Frederick. 2009b. “Kant as Metaphysical Naturalist.” In Metafísica: Ontologia e História. Atas do II Colóquio Internacional de Metafísica, edited by Bauchwitz, Oscar Federico, Bonaccini, Juan, Alves, Daniel Durante Pereira, and da Silva, Markus Figueira. Natal, Brazil: Editoria da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, pp. 141–67.Google Scholar
Rauscher, Frederick. 2010. “The Appendix to the Dialectic and the Canon of Pure Reason: The Positive Role of Reason” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, edited by Guyer, Paul. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 290–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauscher, Frederick. 2012. “Realism and Anti-realism in Kant’s Ethics: A Reply to Professor Dall’Agnol.” In Investigações Kantianas I: Um Debate Plural, edited by Tonetto, Milene Consenso, Pinzani, Alessandro, and Dall’Agnol, Darlei. Florianopolis, Brazil: FUNJAB, pp. 31–43.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1980. “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.” The Journal of Philosophy 77(9): 515–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999a. A Theory of Justice. revised. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999b. Collected Papers. edited by Freeman, Samuel. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999c. “Themes in Kant’s Moral Philosophy.” In Collected Papers, edited by Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 497–528.Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews. 1988. “Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 26: 593–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews. 2006. Agency and Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohden, Valerio. 2012. “An Experiment with Practical Reason.” In Kant in Brazil, North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy, edited by Rauscher, Frederick and Perez, Daniel Omar. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, pp. 98–108.Google Scholar
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1965. Experience and Its Systematization; Studies in Kant. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey. 1988a. Essays on Moral Realism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey. 1988b. “The Many Moral Realisms.” In Essays on Moral Realism, edited by Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Claudia. 2008. “Kant’s Transcendental and Empirical Psychology of Cognition.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39(4): 462–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneewind, J. B. 1997. The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schonecker, Dieter. 1999. Kant–Grundlegung III: Die Deduktion Des Kategorischen Imperativs. Freiburg: Alber.Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver. 2009. “Dignity and the Formula of Humanity.” In Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, edited by Timmermann, Jens. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–18.Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver. 2013. “The Moral Importance of Autonomy.” In Kant on Moral Autonomy, edited by Sensen, Oliver. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 262–81.Google Scholar
Skorupski, John. 1990. “The Intelligibility of Scepticism.” In The Analytic Tradition, edited by Bell, David and Cooper, Neil. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, Joel, and Sullivan, Peter. 2011. “Introduction: Transcendental Philosophy and Naturalism.” In Transcendental Philosophy and Naturalism, edited by Smith, Joel and Sullivan, Peter. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Robert. 2000. Transcendental Arguments and Scepticism: Answering the Question of Justification. Clarendon Press Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Robert. 2003. Transcendental Arguments: Problems and Prospects. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, Robert. 2004. “Does ‘Ought’ Imply ‘Can’? And Did Kant Think It Does?” Utilitas: A Journal of Utilitarian Studies 16: 42–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Robert. 2011a. “The Value of Humanity: Reflection on Korsgaard’s Transcendental Arguments.” In Transcendental Philosophy and Naturalism, edited by Smith, Joel and Sullivan, Peter. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 74–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Robert. 2011b. Understanding Moral Obligation: Kant, Hegel, Kierkegaard. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Robert. 2012. “Constructivism and the Argument from Autonomy.” In Constructivism in Practical Philosophy, edited by Lenman, James and Shemmer, Yonatan. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 119–37.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Leslie. 2003. “Opinion, Belief or Faith, and Knowledge.” Kantian Review 7: 72–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1966. The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason.” London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Street, Sharon. 2008. “Constructivism about Reasons.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, edited by Shafer-Landau, Russ. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 207–45.Google Scholar
Street, Sharon. 2010. “What is Constructivism in Ethics and Metaethics?” Philosophy Compass 5(5): 363–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, Sharon. 2012. “Coming to Terms with Contingency: Human Constructivism about Practical Reason.” In Constructivism in Practical Philosophy, edited by Lenman, James and Shemmer, Yonatan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 40–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, Barry. 1968. “Transcendental Arguments.” Journal of Philosophy 65: 241–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, David. 2008. “From Deduction to Deed: Kant’s Grounding of the Moral Law.” Kantian Review 13-1: 52–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens. 2003. Sittengesetz Und Freiheit: Untersuchungen Zu Immanuel Kants Theorie Des Freien Willens. Berlin; New York: W. de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens. 2007. Kants’ Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaihinger, Hans. 1911. Die Philosophie Des Als Ob. Berlin: Reuther & Reichard.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaihinger, Hans. 1923. Die Philosophie Des Als Ob. Volksausgabe. Leipzig: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. 2005. Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus. 1991. “Die Tat Der Vernunft: Zur Bedeutung Der Kantischen These Vom ‘Factum Der Vernunft’.” In Akten Des Siebenten Internationalen Kant-Kongresses: Kurfürstliches Schloss Zu Mainz 1990, edited by Kleinschnieder, Manfred and Funke, Gerhard. Bonn: Bouvier, pp. 455–66.Google Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus. 1992. Praktische Vernunft: Handlungstheorie Und Moralbegründung Bei Kant. Stuttgart: Verlag J.B. Metzler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus. 2010. “The Primacy of the Practical and the Idea of a Practical Postulate.” In Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide, edited by Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 168–96.Google Scholar
Wolff, Robert Paul. 1974. The Autonomy of Reason: A Commentary on Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 1984. “Kant’s Compatibilism.” In Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy, edited by Wood, Allen W.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 73–101.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 1999. Kant’s Ethical Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 2007. “Comments on Guyer.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50: 465–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen W., and Schönecker, Dieter. 2004. Immanuel Kant’s “Grundlegung Zur Metaphysik Der Sitten”: Ein Einführender Kommentar. 2nd ed. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar