Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 8
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
December 2015
Print publication year:
2015
Online ISBN:
9781316105252

Book description

In this comprehensive assessment of Kant's metaethics, Frederick Rauscher shows that Kant is a moral idealist rather than a moral realist and argues that Kant's ethics does not require metaphysical commitments that go beyond nature. Rauscher frames the argument in the context of Kant's non-naturalistic philosophical method and the character of practical reason as action-oriented. Reason operates entirely within nature, and apparently non-natural claims - God, free choice, and value - are shown to be heuristic and to reflect reason's ordering of nature. The book shows how Kant hesitates between a transcendental moral idealism with an empirical moral realism and a complete moral idealism. Examining every aspect of Kant's ethics, from the categorical imperative to freedom and value, this volume argues that Kant's focus on human moral agency explains morality as a part of nature. It will appeal to academic researchers and advanced students of Kant, German idealism and intellectual history.

Reviews

'Rauscher offers a well-informed and well-argued discussion of two central issues in Kant's ethics, claiming him to be a metaphysical naturalist and a moral idealist. Both views are highly controversial, and Rauscher's contribution to the debate is bound to attract further debate and discussion for some time to come.'

Robert Stern - University of Sheffield

'Frederick Rauscher's Naturalism and Realism in Kant's Ethics defends a bold interpretation of Kant, one that moves Kant still further in the direction of naturalism that other recent Anglophone interpreters of Kant have advocated, but one that also does justice to his idealist roots. Given Kant's continuing influence in nearly every area of philosophy, this is also an interpretation that will warrant careful study from a wide readership.'

Robert Louden - University of Southern Maine

'This is a book that breaks new ground and is worthy of attention.'

Jeanine M. Grenberg Source: Journal of the History of Philosophy

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Works cited

Abela, Paul. 2002a. Kant’s Empirical Realism. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.
Abela, Paul. 2002b. “Kantian Walls and Bridges: Challenging the Integrationist Model of the Relation of Theoretical and Practical Reason.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10(4): 591615.
Adickes, Erich. 1927. Kant Und Die Als-Ob-Philosophie. Stuttgart: Fr. Frommans Verlag (H. Kurtz).
Allison, Henry E. 1986. “Morality and Freedom: Kant’s Reciprocity Thesis.” The Philosophical Review 95(3): 393425.
Allison, Henry E. 1990. Kant’s Theory of Freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Allison, Henry E. 1996. Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant’s Theoretical and Practical Philosophy. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Allison, Henry E. 1997. “We Can Act Only Under the Idea of Freedom.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 71(2): 3950.
Allison, Henry E. 2004. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. Revised and Enlarged Edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Allison, Henry E. 2007. “Comments on Guyer.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50(5): 480–88.
Allison, Henry E. 2011. Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. New York: Oxford University Press.
Allison, Henry E. 2012. Essays on Kant. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Almeida, Guido Antonio. 2012. “Critique, Deduction, and Fact of Reason.” In Kant in Brazil, North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy, edited by Rauscher, Frederick and Perez, Daniel Omar. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, pp. 127–54.
Ameriks, Karl. 1982. Kant’s Theory of Mind: An Analysis of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.
Ameriks, Karl. 2003. Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.
Auxter, Thomas. 1982. Kant’s Moral Teleology. Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press.
Bagnoli, Carla. 2011. “Constructivism in Metaethics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/constructivism-metaethics/ (April 1, 2013).
Bagnoli, Carla. 2012. “Kant’s Contribution to Moral Epistemology.” Paradigmi: Rivista di critica filosofica, pp. 69–79.
Bagnoli, Carla. 2014. “Starting Points: Kantian Constructivism Reassessed.” Ratio Juris 27: 311–29.
Beck, Lewis White. 1960. A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Beck, Lewis White. 1987. “Five Concepts of Freedom in Kant.” In Philosophical Analysis and Reconstruction: A Festschrift for Stephan Körner, edited by Srzednicki, Jan T. J.. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 3551.
Beck, Lewis White. 2002. “The Fact of Reason: An Essay on Justification in Ethics.” In Selected Essays on Kant, North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy, edited by Robinson, Hoke. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, pp. 4556.
Bell, David. 2001. “Is Empirical Realism Compatible with Transcendental Idealism?” In Idealismus als Theorie der Repräsentation?, edited by Schumacher, Ralph and Scholz, Oliver. Paderborn: Mentis Verlag, pp. 167–79.
Bird, Graham. 1995. “Kant and Naturalism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3(2): 399408.
Bird, Graham. 2006. The Revolutionary Kant: A Commentary on the Critique of Pure Reason. Chicago: Open Court.
Bittner, Rudiger. 1989. What Reason Demands. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bojanowski, Jochen. 2012. “Is Kant a Moral Realist?” In Kant and Contemporary Moral Philosophy, Kant Yearbook, edited by Heidemann, Dieter. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 122.
Byrne, Peter. 2007. Kant on God. Hampshire: Ashgate.
De Caro, Mario, and Macarthur, David, eds. 2004. Naturalism in Question. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
De Caro, Mario, and Macarthur, David, eds. 2010. Naturalism and Normativity. New York: Columbia University Press.
Chignell, Andrew. 2007. “Belief in Kant.” Philosophical Review 116(3): 323–60.
Collins, Arthur W. 1999. Possible Experience: Understanding Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cummiskey, David. 1996. Kantian Consequentialism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dall’Agnol, Darlei. 2012a. “On the Factum of Reason.” In Kant in Brazil, North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy, edited by Rauscher, Frederick and Perez, Daniel Omar. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, pp. 109–26.
Dall’Agnol, Darlei. 2012b. “The Idealist Interpretation of Kant’s Metaethics.” In Investigações Kantianas I: Um Debate Plural, edited by Tonetto, Milene Consenso, Pinzani, Alessandro, and Dall’Agnol, Darlei. Florianopolis, Brazil: FUNJAB, pp. 1129.
Dall’Agnol, Darlei. 2013. “Was Kant a Naturalist? Further Reflections on Rauscher’s Idealist Meta-ethics.” Studia Kantiana 14: 142–59.
Davidovich, Adina. 1993. Religion as a Province of Meaning: The Kantian Foundations of Modern Theology. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress.
Dean, Richard. 2006. The Value of Humanity in Kant’s Moral Theory. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.
Denis, Lara. 2003. “Kant’s Criticisms of Atheism.” Kant-Studien: Philosophische Zeitschrift der Kant-Gesellschaft 94(2): 198219.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dye, James Wayne. 1978. “Kant as Ethical Naturalist.” Journal of Value Inquiry 12: 111–25.
Esteves, Julio. 2012. “The Non-Circular Deduction of the Categorical Imperative in Groundwork III.” In Kant in Brazil, North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy, edited by Rauscher, Frederick and Perez, Daniel Omar. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, pp. 155–72.
Falkenburg, Brigitte. 2004. “Kants Naturalismus-Kritik.” In Warum Kant Heute?, edited by Heidemann, Dietmar and Engelhard, Kristina. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 177206.
Feder, Johann Georg Heinrich. 1769. Grundriß Der Philosophischen Wissenschaften Nebst Der Nöthigen Geschichte, Zum Gebrauche Seiner Zuhörer. second. Coberg: Findeisen.
Formosa, Paul. 2013. “Is Kant a Moral Constructivist or a Moral Realist?European Journal of Philosophy 21: 170–96.
Förster, Eckart. 1989. Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three Critiques and the Opus Postumum. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Förster, Eckart. 2000. Kant’s Final Synthesis: An Essay on the Opus Postumum. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Friedman, Michael. 1997. “Philosophical Naturalism.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 71: 521.
Frierson, Patrick. 2003. Freedom and Anthropology in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Frierson, Patrick. 2005. “Kant’s Empirical Account of Human Action.” Philosophers’ Imprint 5(7): 134.
Fugate, Courtney D. 2012. “On a Supposed Solution to the Reinhold/Sidgwick Problem in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals.” European Journal of Philosophy. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2012.00531.x/abstract (August 12, 2013).
Guyer, Paul. 1998. “The Value of Reason and the Value of Freedom.” Ethics 109(1): 2235.
Guyer, Paul. 2000. Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Guyer, Paul. 2007a. Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Reader’s Guide. New York: Continuum.
Guyer, Paul. 2007b. “Naturalistic and Transcendental Moments in Kant’s Moral Philosophy.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50(5): 444–64.
Guyer, Paul. 2009. “Problems with Freedom: Kant’s Argument in Groundwork III and Its Subsequent Emendations.” In Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, edited by Timmermann, Jens. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.176202.
Hanna, Robert. 2001. Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.
Hare, John. 1996. The Moral Gap: Kantian Ethics, Human Limits, and God’s Assistance. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.
Hare, John. 2001 God’s Call: Moral Realism, God’s Commands, and Human Autonomy. Grand Rapids: William B Eerdmans Publishing Co.
Henrich, Dieter. 1975. “Die Deduktion Des Sittengesetzes: Über Die Gründe Der Dunkelheit Des Letzten Abschnittes von Kants ‘Grundlegung Zur Metaphysik Der Sitten’.” In Denken im Schatten des Nihilismus: Festschrift für Wilhelm Weischedel, edited by Schwan, Alexander. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Henrich, Dieter. 1994. “The Concept of Moral Insight and Kant’s Doctrine of the Fact of Reason.” In The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant’s Philosophy, edited by Velkley, Richard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 5587.
Hill, Thomas E. 1989. “Kantian Constructivism in Ethics.” Ethics 99(4): 752–70.
Hill, Thomas E. 2012. Virtue, Rules, and Justice: Kantian Aspirations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Höffe, Otfried. 2010. Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: The Foundation of Modern Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hudson, Hud. 1994. Kant’s Compatibilism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hussain, Nadeem, and Shah, Nishi. 2006. “Misunderstanding Metaethics: Korsgaard’s Rejection of Realism.” Oxford Studies in Metaethics 1(2006): 265–94.
Hutter, Axel. 2003. Das Interesse Der Vernunft: Kants Ursprüngliche Einsichtund Ihre Entfaltung in Den Transzendentalphilosophischen Hauptwerken. Hamburg: F. Meiner.
Johnson, Robert N. 2007. “Value and Autonomy in Kantian Ethics.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, edited by Shafer-Landau, Russ. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 133–48.
Kain, Patrick. 2004. “Self-legislation in Kant’s Moral Philosophy.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86(3): 257306.
Kain, Patrick. 2005. “Interpreting Kant’s Theory of Divine Commands.” Kantian Review 9(1): 128–49.
Kain, Patrick. 2006. “Realism and Anti-Realism in Kant’s Second Critique.” Philosophy Compass 1(5): 449–65.
Kant, Immanuel. 2009. Fundamenação Da Metafísica Dos Costumes. translated and edited by de Almeida, Guido Antonio. São Paulo: Discurso Editorial.
Kaufman, Alexander. 2012. “Rawls and Kantian Constructivism.” Kantian Review 17(02): 227–56.
Kielkopf, Charles F. 1997. A Kantian Condemnation of Atheistic Despair: A Declaration of Dependence. New York: Peter Lang.
Kinnaman, Ted. 2008. “Kant’s Nonfoundationalist Grounding of Reason.” In Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants: Akten des X Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Band 5, edited by Rohden, Valerio, Terra, Ricardo, de Almeida, Guido, and Ruffing, Margit. Berlin: Walter deGruyter, pp. 343–52.
Kitcher, Philip. 1993. “The Evolution of Human Altruism.” The Journal of Philosophy 90: 497516.
Kleingeld, Pauline. 1998. “The Conative Character of Reason in Kant’s Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 36(1): 7797.
Kleingeld, Pauline. 2010. “Moral Consciousness and the Fact of Reason.” In Kant’s “Critique of Practical Reason”: A Critical Guide, edited by Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 5572.
Korsgaard, Christine. 1989. “Personal Identity and the Unity of Agency: A Kantian Response to Parfit.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 18(2): 101–32.
Korsgaard, Christine. 1996a. Creating the Kingdom of Ends. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Korsgaard, Christine. 1996b. The Sources of Normativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Korsgaard, Christine. 2003. “Realism and Constructivism in Twentieth-century Moral Philosophy.” Journal of Philosophical Research 28: 99122.
Korsgaard, Christine. 2008. The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Krasnoff, Larry. 1999. “How Kantian Is Constructivism?Kant-Studien 90(4): 385409.
Kuehn, Manfred. 2001. Kant: A Biography. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Loparic, Zeljko. 2005. A Semântica Transcendental de Kant. 3rd ed. Campinas, Brazil: Coleção CLE.
Louden, Robert B. 2000. Kant’s Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings. New York: Oxford University Press.
Manchester, Paula. 2008. “Kant’s Conception of Architectonic in Its Philosophical Context.” Kantstudien 99: 133–51.
Meerbote, Ralf. 1984. “Kant on the Nondeterminate Character of Human Actions.” In Kant on Causality, Freedom, and Objectivity, edited by Meerbote, Ralf and Harper, William. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 138–63.
Mieth, Corinna, and Rosenthal, Jacob. 2006. “‘Freedom Must Be Presupposed as a Property of All Rational Beings’.” In Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, edited by Horn, Christoph, Schönecker, Dieter, and Mieth, Corinna. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 247–84.
Naragon, Steve. 2006. Kant in the Classroom. www.manchester.edu/kant/Home/index.htm (July 14, 2014).
O’Neill, Onora. 1989. Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
O’Neill, Onora. 2002. “Constructivism in Rawls and Kant.” In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, edited by Freeman, Samuel. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 347–67.
O’Neill, Onora. 2003. “Constructivism vs. Contractualism.” Ratio 16(4): 319–31.
Pierce, Drew. 2004. “Kant e a Justifição das Crenças Morais.” Impulso Piracicaba 15: 3546.
Pihlström, Sami. 2001. “Naturalism, Transcendental Conditions, and the Self-Discipline of Philosophical Reason.” Journal of Speculative Philosophy: A Quarterly Journal of History 15: 228–50.
Pihlström, Sami. 2004. “Recent Reinterpretations of the Transcendental.” Inquiry 47: 289314.
Pollok, Konstantin. 2013. “Naturalism and Kant’s Resolution of the Third Antinomy”. In Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht, Akten des XI Kant-Kongresses 2010, edited by Bacin, Stefano, Ferrarin, Alfredo, La Rocca, Claudio, and Ruffing, Margit. Berlin. Band 2: 731–42.
Proops, Ian. 2003. “Kant’s Legal Metaphor and the Nature of a Deduction.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 41: 209–29.
Rauscher, Frederick. 1998. “Kant’s Two Priorities of Practical Reason.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6(3): 397419.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2002. “Kant’s Moral Anti-Realism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 40: 477–99.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2006a. “Razão Prática Pura Como Uma Faculdade Natural.” Ethic@ https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/issue/view/1453. 5: 173–92.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2006b. “Reason as a Natural Cause.” In Moralische Motivation. Kant und die Alternativen, Forschungen, Kant, edited by Klemme, Heiner, Kühn, Manfred, and Schönecker, Dieter. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, pp. 97110.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2007. “‘God’ Without God: Kant’s Postulate.” Kant e-Prints 2: 2762.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2009a. “Freedom and Reason in Groundwork III.” In Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, edited by Timmermann, Jens. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 203–23.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2009b. “Kant as Metaphysical Naturalist.” In Metafísica: Ontologia e História. Atas do II Colóquio Internacional de Metafísica, edited by Bauchwitz, Oscar Federico, Bonaccini, Juan, Alves, Daniel Durante Pereira, and da Silva, Markus Figueira. Natal, Brazil: Editoria da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, pp. 141–67.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2010. “The Appendix to the Dialectic and the Canon of Pure Reason: The Positive Role of Reason” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, edited by Guyer, Paul. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 290309.
Rauscher, Frederick. 2012. “Realism and Anti-realism in Kant’s Ethics: A Reply to Professor Dall’Agnol.” In Investigações Kantianas I: Um Debate Plural, edited by Tonetto, Milene Consenso, Pinzani, Alessandro, and Dall’Agnol, Darlei. Florianopolis, Brazil: FUNJAB, pp. 3143.
Rawls, John. 1980. “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.” The Journal of Philosophy 77(9): 515–72.
Rawls, John. 1999a. A Theory of Justice. revised. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John. 1999b. Collected Papers. edited by Freeman, Samuel. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Rawls, John. 1999c. “Themes in Kant’s Moral Philosophy.” In Collected Papers, edited by Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 497528.
Reath, Andrews. 1988. “Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 26: 593619.
Reath, Andrews. 1994. “Legislating the Moral Law.” Noûs 28: 435–64.
Reath, Andrews. 2006. Agency and Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ritchie, Jack. 2008. Understanding Naturalism. Stocksfield, UK: Acumen.
Rohden, Valerio. 2012. “An Experiment with Practical Reason.” In Kant in Brazil, North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy, edited by Rauscher, Frederick and Perez, Daniel Omar. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, pp. 98108.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 1965. Experience and Its Systematization; Studies in Kant. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey. 1988a. Essays on Moral Realism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey. 1988b. “The Many Moral Realisms.” In Essays on Moral Realism, edited by Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 123.
Schmidt, Claudia. 2008. “Kant’s Transcendental and Empirical Psychology of Cognition.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39(4): 462–72.
Schneewind, J. B. 1997. The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schonecker, Dieter. 1999. Kant–Grundlegung III: Die Deduktion Des Kategorischen Imperativs. Freiburg: Alber.
Sensen, Oliver. 2009. “Dignity and the Formula of Humanity.” In Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, edited by Timmermann, Jens. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–18.
Sensen, Oliver. 2011. Kant on Human Dignity. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Sensen, Oliver. 2013. “The Moral Importance of Autonomy.” In Kant on Moral Autonomy, edited by Sensen, Oliver. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 262–81.
Skorupski, John. 1990. “The Intelligibility of Scepticism.” In The Analytic Tradition, edited by Bell, David and Cooper, Neil. Oxford: Blackwell.
Smith, Joel, and Sullivan, Peter. 2011. “Introduction: Transcendental Philosophy and Naturalism.” In Transcendental Philosophy and Naturalism, edited by Smith, Joel and Sullivan, Peter. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 125.
Stern, Robert. 2000. Transcendental Arguments and Scepticism: Answering the Question of Justification. Clarendon Press Oxford.
Stern, Robert. 2003. Transcendental Arguments: Problems and Prospects. Oxford University Press.
Stern, Robert. 2004. “Does ‘Ought’ Imply ‘Can’? And Did Kant Think It Does?Utilitas: A Journal of Utilitarian Studies 16: 4261.
Stern, Robert. 2011a. “The Value of Humanity: Reflection on Korsgaard’s Transcendental Arguments.” In Transcendental Philosophy and Naturalism, edited by Smith, Joel and Sullivan, Peter. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 7495.
Stern, Robert. 2011b. Understanding Moral Obligation: Kant, Hegel, Kierkegaard. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stern, Robert. 2012. “Constructivism and the Argument from Autonomy.” In Constructivism in Practical Philosophy, edited by Lenman, James and Shemmer, Yonatan. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 119–37.
Stevenson, Leslie. 2003. “Opinion, Belief or Faith, and Knowledge.” Kantian Review 7: 72101.
Strawson, P. F. 1966. The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason.” London: Methuen.
Street, Sharon. 2008. “Constructivism about Reasons.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, edited by Shafer-Landau, Russ. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 207–45.
Street, Sharon. 2010. “What is Constructivism in Ethics and Metaethics?Philosophy Compass 5(5): 363–84.
Street, Sharon. 2012. “Coming to Terms with Contingency: Human Constructivism about Practical Reason.” In Constructivism in Practical Philosophy, edited by Lenman, James and Shemmer, Yonatan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 4059.
Stroud, Barry. 1968. “Transcendental Arguments.” Journal of Philosophy 65: 241–56.
Sussman, David. 2008. “From Deduction to Deed: Kant’s Grounding of the Moral Law.” Kantian Review 13-1: 5281.
Timmermann, Jens. 2003. Sittengesetz Und Freiheit: Untersuchungen Zu Immanuel Kants Theorie Des Freien Willens. Berlin; New York: W. de Gruyter.
Timmermann, Jens. 2007. Kants’ Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Vaihinger, Hans. 1911. Die Philosophie Des Als Ob. Berlin: Reuther & Reichard.
Vaihinger, Hans. 1923. Die Philosophie Des Als Ob. Volksausgabe. Leipzig: Felix Meiner Verlag.
Ward, Keith. 1972. The Development of Kant’s View of Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Watkins, Eric. 2005. Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Willaschek, Marcus. 1991. “Die Tat Der Vernunft: Zur Bedeutung Der Kantischen These Vom ‘Factum Der Vernunft’.” In Akten Des Siebenten Internationalen Kant-Kongresses: Kurfürstliches Schloss Zu Mainz 1990, edited by Kleinschnieder, Manfred and Funke, Gerhard. Bonn: Bouvier, pp. 455–66.
Willaschek, Marcus. 1992. Praktische Vernunft: Handlungstheorie Und Moralbegründung Bei Kant. Stuttgart: Verlag J.B. Metzler.
Willaschek, Marcus. 2010. “The Primacy of the Practical and the Idea of a Practical Postulate.” In Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide, edited by Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 168–96.
Wolff, Robert Paul. 1974. The Autonomy of Reason: A Commentary on Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. New York: Harper & Row.
Wood, Allen W. 1970. Kant’s Moral Religion. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Wood, Allen W. 1984. “Kant’s Compatibilism.” In Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy, edited by Wood, Allen W.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 73101.
Wood, Allen W. 1999. Kant’s Ethical Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wood, Allen W. 2007. “Comments on Guyer.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50: 465–79.
Wood, Allen W. 2008. Kantian Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wood, Allen W., and Schönecker, Dieter. 2004. Immanuel Kant’s “Grundlegung Zur Metaphysik Der Sitten”: Ein Einführender Kommentar. 2nd ed. Paderborn: Schöningh.
Zammito, John. 2008. “Kant and Naturalism Reconsidered.” Inquiry 51: 532–58.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.