Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T06:36:59.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 17 - Knee oral core topics

from Section 4 - The general orthopaedics and pathology oral

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2017

By
Khaled M. Sarraf  and
Deiary F. Kader
Edited by
Paul A. Banaszkiewicz  and
Deiary F. Kader
Paul A. Banaszkiewicz
Affiliation:
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead
Deiary F. Kader
Affiliation:
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Postgraduate Orthopaedics
The Candidate's Guide to the FRCS (Tr & Orth) Examination
 , pp. 292 - 338
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fairbank, TJ. Knee joint changes after meniscectomy J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1948;30:664–70.Google Scholar
Tapper, EM, Hoover, NW. Late results after meniscectomy J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:517–26CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, RJ, Kettelkamp, DB, Clark, W, Leaverton, P. Factors effecting late results after meniscectomy J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:719–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniel, DM, Stone, ML, Dobson, BE, Fithian, DC, Rossman, DJ, Kaufman, KR. Fate of the ACL-injured patient: A prospective outcome study Am J Sports Med. 1994;22:632–644Google Scholar
Noyes, FR, Butler, DL, Grood, ES, Zernicke, RF, Hefzy, MS. Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:344–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Thompson, WO, Thaete, FL, Fu, FH, Dye, SF. Tibial meniscal dynamics using 3-dimensional reconstruction of magnetic-resonance images. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:210–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnoczky, SP, Warren, RF. Microvasculature of the human meniscus. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10:90–5.Google Scholar
Lee, SJ, Aadalen, KJ, Malaviya, P, et al. Tibiofemoral contact mechanics after serial medial meniscectomies in the human cadaveric knee. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1334–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allaire, R, Muriuki, M, Gilbertson, L, Harner, CD. Biomechanical consequences of a tear of the posterior root of the medial meniscus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1922–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Girolamo, D, Galliera, E, Volpi, P, et al. Why menisci show higher healing rate when repaired during ACL reconstruction? Growth factors release can be the explanation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Artrosc. 2015;23:90–6.Google Scholar
Smith, JP III, Barrett, GR. Medial and lateral meniscal tear patterns in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees: A prospective analysis of 575 tears. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:415–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felson, DT, Zhang, Y. An update on the epidemiology of knee and hip osteoarthritis with a view to prevention. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41:1343–55.Google Scholar
Cannon, WD, Vittori, JM. The incidence of healing in arthroscopic meniscal repairs in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees versus stable knees. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20:176–81.Google Scholar
Barber, FA, Schroeder, FA, Oro, FB, Beavis, RC. FasT-Fix meniscal repair: Mid-term results. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:1342–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, JD, Brophy, RH, Siston, RA, Flanigan, DC. Treatment of chondral defects in the athelete’s knee. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:841–52.Google Scholar
Edmonds, EW, Polousky, J. A review of knowledge in osteochondritis dissecans: 123 years of minimal evolution from König to the ROCK study group. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:1118–26.Google Scholar
Brittberg, M, Winalski, CS. Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(Suppl 2):58–69.Google Scholar
Zaslav, K, Cole, B, Brewster, R, et al. A prospective study of autologous chondrocyte implantation in patients with failed prior treatment for articular cartilage defect of the knee results of the study of the treatment of articular repair (STAR) clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:42–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becher, C, Huber, R, Thermann, H, Paessler, HH, Skrbensky, G. Effects of a contoured articular prosthetic device on tibiofemoral peak contact pressure: A biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:56–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parsons, EM, Gee, AO, Spiekerman, C, Cavanagh, PR. The biomechanical function of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:669–74.Google Scholar
Levy, AS, Meier, SW. Approach to cartilage injury in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 2003;34:149–67.Google Scholar
Johnson, DL, Urban, WP, Caborn, DNM, et al. Articular cartilage changes seen with magnetic resonance imaging – Detected bone bruises associated with anterior cruciate rupture. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:409–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, KM, Bullock, JM. Anterior cruciate ligament rupture: Differences between males and females. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21:41–50.Google Scholar
Dodds, AL, Halewood, C, Gupte, CM, Williams, A, Amis, AA. The anterolateral ligament: anatomy, length changes and association with the Segond fracture. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B:325–31.Google ScholarPubMed
McDaniel, WJ, Dameron, TB. Untreated ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament – A follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:696–705.Google Scholar
McDaniel, WJ, Dameron, TB. The untreated anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;172:158–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koga, H, Muneta, T, Yagishita, K, et al. Mid- to long-term results of single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Randomised controlled trial. Arthroscopy. 2014;ii:S0749–8063.Google Scholar
Tiamklang, T, Sumanont, S, Foocharoen, T, Laopaiboon, M. Double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD008413.Google Scholar
Driscoll, MD, Isabell, GP Jr, Conditt, MA, et al. Comparison of two femoral tunnel locations in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A biomechanical study. Arthroscopy. 2012;28:1481–9.Google Scholar
Redler, LH, Brafman, RT, Trentacosta, N, Ahmad, CS. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients with transphyseal tunnels. Arthroscopy. 2012;28:1710–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noyes, FR, Barber-Westin SD. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with human allograft: comparison of early and later results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:524–37.Google Scholar
Kim, JG, Lim, HC, Kim, HJ, et al. Delayed detection of clinically significant posterior cruciate ligament injury after periarticular fracture around the knee of 448 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132:1741–6.Google Scholar
Dickson, KF, Galland, MW, Barrack, RL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee after ipsilateral femur fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:567–71.Google Scholar
Li, Y, Li, J, Wang, J, Gao, S, Zhang, Y. Comparison of single-bundle and double-bundle isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft: A prospective, randomised study. Arthroscopy. 2014;30:695–700.Google Scholar
Natsuhara, KM, Yeranosian, MG, Cohen, JR, et al. What is the frequency of vascular injury after knee dislocation? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:2615–20.Google Scholar
Medina, O, Arom, GA, Yeranosian, MG, Petrigliano, FA, McAllister, DR. Vascular and nerve injury after knee dislocation: A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:2621–9.Google Scholar
Gollehon, DL, Torzilli, PA, Warren, RF. The role of the posterolateral and cruciate ligaments in the stability of the human knee – A biochemical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69-A:233–42.Google Scholar
Grood, ES, Stowers, SF, Noyes, FR. Limits of movement in the human knee – Effect of sectioning the posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral structures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:88–97.Google Scholar
Dye, SF. The pathophysiology of patellofemoral pain – A tissue homeostasis perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436:100–10.Google Scholar
Desio, SM, Burks, RT, Bachus, KN. Soft tissue restraints to lateral patellar translation in the human knee. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:59–65.Google Scholar
Nomura, E, Horiuchi, Y, Inoue, M. Correlation of MR imaging findings and open exploration of medial patellofemoral ligament injuries in acute patellar dislocations. Knee. 2002;9:139–43.Google Scholar
Stephen, JM, Lumpaopong, P, Deehan, DJ, Kader, D, Amis, AA. The medial patellofemoral ligament: Location of femoral attachment and length change patterns resulting from anatomic and nonanatomic attachments. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:1871–9.Google Scholar
Stephen, JM, Kaider, D, Lumpaopong, P, Deehan, DJ, Amis, AA. The effect of femoral tunnel position and graft tension on patellar contact mechanics and kinematics after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:364–72.Google Scholar
Lippacher, S, Dreyhaupt, J, Williams, SR, Reichel, H, Nelitz, M. Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament: Clinical outcomes and return to sports. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:1661–8.Google Scholar
Ackroyd, CE, Newman, JH, Evans, R, Eldridge, JD, Joslin, CC. The Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty: Five-year survivorship and functional results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:310–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Odumenya, M, Costa, ML, Parsons, N, et al. The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: five-year results from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:56–60.Google Scholar
Iwano, T, Kurosawa, H, Tokuyama, H, Hoshikawa, Y. Roentographic and clinical findings of patellofemoral arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;252:190–7.Google Scholar
Van Jonbergen, HP, Poolman, RW, van Kampen, A. Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:199–205.Google Scholar
Van Jonbergen, HPW, Werkman, DM, van Kampen, A. Conversion of patellofemoral arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty. A matched case-control study of 13 patients. Acta Orthop. 2009;80:62–6.Google Scholar
Blatter, G, Jackson, RW, Bayne, O, Magerl, F. Patellectomy as a salvage procedure. Orthopade. 1987;16:310–16.Google Scholar
O’Connor, MI. Sex differences in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Br. 2007;15:S22–5.Google Scholar
Peyron, J, Altman, R. The epidemiology of osteoarthritis. In Moskowitz, R, Howell, D, Goldberg, V, Mankin, H (eds). Osteoarthritis: Diagnosis and Management, second edn. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1992, pp. 15–37.Google Scholar
Felson, DT, Chaisson, CE. Understanding the relationship between body weight and osteoarthritis. Baillières Clin Rheumatol. 1997;11:671–81.Google Scholar
Feeley, BT, Gallo, RA, Sherman, S, Williams, RJ. Management of osteoarthritis of the knee in the active patient. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18:406–16.Google Scholar
Kirkley, A, Birmingham, TB, Litchfield, RB, et al. A randomised trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Eng J Med. 2008;359:1097–107.Google Scholar
Li, Y, Zhang, H, Zhang, J, et al. Clinical outcome of simultaneous high tibial osteotomy and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for medial compartment osteoarthritis in young patients with anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees: A systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2014;14:S749–803.Google Scholar
Fujisawa, Y, Masuhara, K, Shiomi, S. The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee: An arthroscopic study of 54 knee joints. Orthop Clin North Am. 1979;10:585–608.Google Scholar
Hernigou, P, Medevielle, D, Debeyre, J, Goutallier, D. Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity. A 10 to 13-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:332–54.Google Scholar
Brinkman, JM, Lobenhoffer, P, Agneskirchner, JD, et al. Osteotomies around the knee: Patient selection, stability of fixation and bone healing in high tibial osteotomies. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1548–57.Google ScholarPubMed
Coventry, MB, Ilstrup, DM, Wallrichs, SL. Proximal tibial osteotomy – A critical long-term study of 87 case. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:196–201.Google Scholar
Luna, JT, Sembrano, JN, Gioe, TJ. Mobile and fixed-bearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs surgical . J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92-A:240–9.Google Scholar
Oh, KJ, Pandher, DS, Lee, SH, Joon, SDS Jr, Lee, ST. Meta-analysis comparing outcomes of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:873–84.Google Scholar
Jeffery, RS, Morris, RW, Denham, RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:709–14.Google Scholar
Fang, DM, Ritter, MA, Davis, KE. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty – Just how important is it? J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:39–43.Google Scholar
Parratte, S, Pagnano, MW, Trousdale, RT, Berry, DJ. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92-A:2143–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, RSJ, Boone, JL, Rosenzweig, SD, Steger-May, K, Barrack, RL. Patellar resurfacing compared with nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A concise follow-up of a randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2562–7.Google Scholar
Van Jonbergen, HP, Scholtes, VA, Poolman, RW. A randomised, controlled trial of circumpatellar electrocautery in total knee replacement without patellar resurfacing: A concise follow-up at a mean of 3.7 years. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B:473–8.Google Scholar
Roberts, DW, Hayes, TD, Tate, CT, Lesko, JP. Selective patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective, randomised, double-blind study. J Arthroplasty. 2014;14:5403.Google Scholar
Barrack, RL, Bertot, AJ, Wolfe, MW, et al. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty – A prospective, randomised, double-blind study with five to seven years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83–A:1376–81.Google Scholar
Keblish, PA, Varma, AK, Greenwald, AS. Patellar resurfacing or retention in total knee arthroplasty – A prospective study of patients with bilateral replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76-B:930–7.Google Scholar
Wood, DJ, Smith, AJ, Collopy, D, et al. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty – A prospective, randomised tria. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:187–93.Google Scholar
Cartier, P, Sanouiller, JL, Khefacha, A. Long-term results with the first patellofemoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436:47–54.Google Scholar
White, SH, Ludkowski, PF, Good fellow, JW. Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:582–6.Google Scholar
Kumar, V, Pandit, HG, Liddle, AD, et al. Comparison of outcomes after UKA in patients with and without chondrocalcinosis: A matched cohort study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015, Mar 19. (Epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
Sarraf, KM, Konan, S, Pastides, PS, Haddad, FS, Oussedik, S. Bone loss during revision of unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty: An analysis of implanted polyethylene thickness from the National Joint Registry data. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:1571–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Della Valle, C, Parvizi, J, Bauer, TW, et al. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18:760–70.Google Scholar
Pang, HN, Naudie, DD, McCalden, RW, MacDonald, SJ, Teeter, MG. Highly crosslinked polyethylene improves wear but not surface damage in retrieved acetabular liners. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014, Aug 13. (Epub ahead of print)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakellariou, VI, Sculco, P, Poultsides, L, Wright, T, Sculco, TP. Highly cross-linked polyethylene may not have an advantage in total knee arthroplasty. HSS J. 2013;9:264–9.Google Scholar
Berbari, E, Mabry, T, Tsaras, G, et al. Inflammatory blood laboratory levels as markers of prosthetic joint infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2102–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, J, Merz, A, Frommelt, L, Fink, B. High rate of infection control with one-stage revision of septic knee prostheses excluding MRSA and MRSE. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:1461–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romanò, CL, Gala, L, Logoluso, N, Romanò, D, Drago, L. Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:2445–53.Google Scholar
Sarraf, KM, Atherton, DD, Jayaweera, AR, Gibbons, CE, Jones, I. Salvage of the lower limb after a full thickness burn with loss of the knee extensor mechanism. J Orthop Surg Hong Kong. 2013;21:122–4.Google Scholar
Garratt, AM, Brealey, S, Gillespie, WJ, Team, DT. Patient-assessed health instruments for the knee: A structured review. Rheumatology. 2004;43:1414–23.Google Scholar
Rothwell, AG, Hooper, GJ, Hobbs, A, Frampton, CM. An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:413–18.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×