Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T00:08:48.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 16 - Hip oral core topics

from Section 4 - The general orthopaedics and pathology oral

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2017

By
Sammy A. Hanna  and
Paul A. Banaszkiewicz
Edited by
Paul A. Banaszkiewicz  and
Deiary F. Kader
Paul A. Banaszkiewicz
Affiliation:
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead
Deiary F. Kader
Affiliation:
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Postgraduate Orthopaedics
The Candidate's Guide to the FRCS (Tr & Orth) Examination
 , pp. 228 - 291
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ficat, RP. Idiopathic bone necrosis of the femoral head. Early diagnosis and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67:3–9.Google Scholar
Mont, MA, Hungerford, DS. Non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:459.Google Scholar
Lewinnek, GE, Lewis, JL, Tarr, R, Compere, CL, Zimmerman, JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:217–220.Google Scholar
Harris, WH, McCarthy, JC Jr, O’Neill, DA. Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1063–7.Google Scholar
Gruen, TA, McNeice, GM, Amstutz, HC. Modes of failure of cemented stem-type femoral components: A radiographic analysis of loosening Clin Orthop. 1979;141:17–27.Google Scholar
Barrack, RL, Mulroy, RD Jr, Harris, WH. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty: A 12-year radiographic review J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:385–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Engh, CA, Bobyn, JD, Glassman, AH. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69-B:45–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deirmengian, GK, Zmistowski, B, O'Neil, JT, Hozack, WJ. Management of acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1842–1852.Google Scholar
Reid, C, Grobler, GP, Dower, BJ, Nortje, MB, Walters, J. Revision total hip arthroplasty: Addressing acetabular bone loss. SA Orthop J. 2012;11:34–46.Google Scholar
Brooker, AF, Bowerman, JW, Robinson, RA, Riley, LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: Incidence and a method of classification J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:1629–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Gautier, E, Ganz, K, Krügel, N, Gill, T, Ganz, R. Anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery and its surgical implications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:679–83.Google Scholar
Babis, G, Sakellariou, V, Parvizi, J, Soucacos, P. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Orthopedics. 2011;34:39–48.Google Scholar
Jones, JP. Concepts of etiology and early pathogenesis of osteonecrosis. Instructional Course Lect. 1994;43:499–512.Google ScholarPubMed
Banaszkiewicz, PA. Idiopathic bone necrosis of the femoral head. Early diagnosis and treatment. Classic Papers in Orthopaedics.London: Springer; 2014: pp. 121–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, DG, Rao, VM, Dalinka, MK, et al. Femoral head necrosis: Correlation of MR imaging, radiographic staging, radionuclide imaging, and clinical findings. Radiology. 1987;162:709–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohzono, K, Sugano, N, Takaoka, K, et al. Natural history of nontraumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:68–72.Google Scholar
Agarwala, S, Shah, S, Joshi, VR. The use of alendronate in the treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head: Follow-up to 8 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1013–18.Google Scholar
Rajpura, A, Wright, AC, Board, TN. Medical management of osteonecrosis of the hip: A review. Hip. 2011;21:385–92.Google Scholar
Aigner, N, Petje, G, Schneider, W, et al. Juvenile bone-marrow oedema of the acetabulum treated by iloprost. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:1050–2.Google Scholar
Reis, ND, Schwartz, O, Militianu, D, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy as a treatment for stage-I avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:371–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Camporesi, EM, Vezzani, G, Bosco, G, Mangar, D, Bernasek, TL. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in femoral head necrosis. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(suppl):118–23.Google Scholar
Mont, MA, Marulanda, GA, Jones, LC, et al. Systematic analysis of classification systems for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:16–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Tanzer, M, Bobyn, JD, Krygier, JJ, Karabasz, D. Histopathologic retrieval analysis of clinically failed porous tantalum osteonecrosis implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1282–9.Google Scholar
Mont, MA, Jones, LC, Hungerford, DS. Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Ten years later. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1117–32.Google Scholar
Sugioka, Y, Hotokebuchi, T, Tsutsui, H. Transtrochanteric anterior rotational osteotomy for idiopathic and steroid-induced necrosis of the femoral head. Indications and long-term results. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1992;277:111–20.Google Scholar
Kabata, T, Maeda, T, Tanaka, K, et al. Hemi-resurfacing versus total resurfacing for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Orthop Surg. 2011;19:177–80.Google Scholar
Amstutz, HC, Le Duff, MJ. Hip resurfacing for osteonecrosis: two- to 18-year results of the Conserve Plus design and technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2016;98-B(7):901–9.Google Scholar
Cheung, KW, Chiu, KH, Chung, KY. Long-term result of cementless femoral stem in avascular necrosis of the hip. Hip Int. 2015;2 5:72–5.Google Scholar
Johannson, HR, Zywiel, MG, Marker, DR. Osteonecrosis is not a predictor of poor outcomes in primary total hip arthroplasty: A systematic literature review. Int Orthop. 2010;35:465–73.Google Scholar
Chandler, HP, Reineck, FT, Wixson, RL, McCarthy, JC. Total hip replacement in patients younger than 30 years old. A 5-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:1426–34.Google Scholar
Stauffer, RN. Ten-year follow-up study of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:983–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fyda, TM, Callaghan, JJ, Olejniczak, J, Johnston, RC. Minimum ten-year follow-up of cemented total hip replacement in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Orthop Trans. 2002;22:8–19.Google Scholar
Garino, JP, Steinberg, ME. Total hip arthroplasty in patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head: A 2- to 10-year follow-up. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1997;334:108–15.Google Scholar
Kim, Y-H, Oh, S-H, Kim, JS, Koo, K-H. Contemporary total hip arthroplasty with and without cement in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:675–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mont, MA, Zywiel, MG, Marker, DR, et al. The natural history of untreated asymptomatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2165–70.Google Scholar
Nam, KW, Kim, YL. Fate of untreated asymptomatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:477–84.Google Scholar
Mont, MA, Jones, LC, Hungerford, DS.Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: Ten years later. J Bone Joint Surg Am.2006; 88: 1117–32.Google Scholar
Mont, MA, Hungerford, DS. Non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:459–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirst, P, Esser, M, Murphy, JC, Hardinge, K. Bone grafting for protrusio acetabuli during total hip replacement. A review of the Wrightington method in 61 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69:229–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Armbuster, TG, Guerra, J, Resnick, D, et al. The adult hip: An anatomic study. Radiology. 1978;128:1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leunig, M, Nho, SJ, Turchetto, L, Ganz, R. Protrusio acetabuli: New insights and experience with joint preservation. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2009;467:2241–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia-Cimbrelo, E, Diaz-Martin, A, Madero, R, Munera, L. Loosening of the cup after low-friction arthroplasty in patients with acetabular protrusion. The importance of the position of the cup. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:108–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayley, JC, Christie, MJ, Ewald, FC, Kelley, K. Long-term results of total hip arthroplasty in protrusio acetabuli. J Arthrop. 1987;2:275–9.Google Scholar
Baghdadi, YMK, Larson, AN, Sierra, RJ. Restoration of the hip center during THA performed for protrusio acetabuli is associated with better implant survival. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2013;471:3251–9.Google Scholar
Sturridge, S, Bankes, M. Focus on acetabular dysplasia in adults. J Bone Joint Surg. 2010;32:1–3.Google Scholar
Clohisy, JC, Carlisle, JC, Beaulé, PE, et al. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krych, AJ. Total hip arthroplasty with shortening subtrochanteric osteotomy in Crowe type-IV developmental dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewinnek, GE, Lewis, JL, Tarr, R, Compere, CL, Zimmerman, JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:217–20.Google Scholar
Hunt, LP. Ninety-day mortality after 409 096 total hip replacements for osteoarthritis, from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales: A retrospective analysis. Lancet 382;2013:1097–104.Google Scholar
Ji, HM, Kim, KC, Lee, YK, Ha, YC, Koo, KH. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: A randomised clinical trial of a posterior approach and a modified lateral approach. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:378–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedlundh, U, Ahnfelt, L, Hybbinette, CH, Weckstrom, J, Fredin, H. Surgical experience related to dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:206–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Battaglia, TC, Mulhall, KJ, Brown, TE, Saleh, KJ. Increased surgical volume is associated with lower THA dislocation rates. Clin Orthop. 2006;447:28–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woo, RY, Morrey, BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1295–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsukayama, DT, Estrada, R, Gustilo, RB. Infection after total hip arthroplasty. A study of 106 infections. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:512–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lidwell, OM, Lowbury, EJ, Whyte, W, et al. Effect of ultraclean air in operating rooms on deep sepsis in the joint after total hip or knee replacement: A randomised study. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 1982;285:10–14.Google Scholar
Glithero, PR, Grigoris, P, Herding, LK, et al. White cell scans and infected joint replacements. Failure to detect chronic infection. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:371–4.Google Scholar
Robbins, GM, Masri, BA, Garbuz, DS, Duncan, C. Evaluation of pain in patients with apparently solidly fixed total hip arthroplasty components. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002;10:86–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lonner, JH, Desai, P, Dicesare, PE, Steiner, G, Zuckerman, JD.The reliability of analysis of intraoperative frozen sections for identifying active infection during revision hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1553–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerli, W, Trampuz, A, Ochsner, PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1645–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchholz, HW, Elson, RA, Engelbrecht, E, et al. Management of deep infection of total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63:342–53.Google Scholar
Wroblewski, BM. One-stage revision of infected cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1986;211:103–7.Google Scholar
Zeller, V, Hotellier, L, Marmor, S, et al. One-stage exchange arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic hip infection: Results of a large prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:e1.Google Scholar
Engesæter, LB, Dale, H, Schrama, JC, Hallan, G, Lie, SA. Surgical procedures in the treatment of 784 infected THAs reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2011;82:530–7.Google Scholar
Matar, WY, Jafari, SM, Restrepo, C, et al. Preventing infection in total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:36–46.Google Scholar
Gruen, TA, McNeice, GM, Amstutz, HC. Modes of failure of cemented stem-type femoral components: A radiographic analysis of loosening Clin Orthop. 1979;141:17–27.Google Scholar
Harris, WH, McCarthy, JC Jr, O’Neill, DA. Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1063–7.Google Scholar
Kwong, LM, Jasty, M, Mulroy, RD, et al. The histology of the radiolucent line. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:67–73.Google Scholar
Barrack, RL, Mulroy, RD Jr, Harris, WH. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:385–9.Google Scholar
Mulroy, WF, Estok, DM, Harris, WH. Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1845–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jasty, M, Maloney, WJ, Bragdon, CR, et al. The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:551–8.Google Scholar
Berry, DJ, Pellicci, PM, Tria, AJ, et al. Evolution of uncemented femoral component design. In Pellicci, PM, Tria, AJ Garvin, K (eds). Orthopaedic Knowledge Update: Hip and Knee Reconstruction. Rosemont, IL: Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2000, pp. 117–27.Google Scholar
Khanuja, HS, Vakil, JJ, Goddard, MS, Mont, MA. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:500–9.Google Scholar
Carrothers, AD, Gilbert, RE, Jaiswal, A, Richardson, JB. Birmingham hip resurfacing: The prevalence of failure. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:1344–50.Google Scholar
Langton, DJ, Jameson, SS, Joyce, TJ, et al. Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:1011–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Glyn-Jones, S, Pandit, H, Kwon, YM, et al. Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1566–74.Google Scholar
Dee Haan, R, Pattyn, C, Gill, HS, et al. Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1291–7.Google Scholar
Smith, AJ, Dieppe, P, Vernon, K, et al. Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements: Analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Lancet. 2012;379:1199–204.Google Scholar
Langton, DJ, Jameson, SS, Joyce, TJ, et al. Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:1011–16.Google Scholar
Brockett, CL, Harper, P, Williams, S, et al. The influence of clearance on friction, lubrication and squeaking in large diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19:1575–9.Google Scholar
De Smet, K, Campbell, PA, Gill, HS. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: A consensus from the advanced hip resurfacing course, Ghent, June 2009. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:335–6.Google Scholar
Brooker, AF, Bowerman, JW, Robinson, RA, Riley, LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:1629–32.Google Scholar
Horwitz, BR, Rockowitz, NL, Goll, SR, et al. A prospective randomised comparison of two surgical approaches to total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1993;291:154–63.Google Scholar
Vavken, P, Castellani, L, Sculco, TP. Prophylaxis of heterotopic ossification of the hip: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2009;467:3283–9.Google Scholar
Toom, A, Fischer, K, Märtson, A, Rips, L, Haviko, T. Interobserver reliability in the assessment of heterotopic ossification: Proposal of a combined classification. Int Orthop. 2005;29:156–9.Google Scholar
Wright, JG, Moran, E, Bogoch, E. Reliability and validity of the grading of heterotopic ossification. J Arthrop. 1994;9:549–53.Google Scholar
Hardinge, K, Williams, D, Etienne, A, MacKenzie, D, Charnley, J. Conversion of fused hips to low friction arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1977;59:385–92.Google Scholar
Kim, YY, Ko, CU, Ahn, JY, Yoon, YS, Kwak, BM. Charnley low friction arthroplasty in tuberculosis of the hip. An 8 to 13-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:756–60.Google Scholar
Kim, SJ, Postigo, R, Koo, S, Kim, JH. Total hip replacement for patients with active tuberculosis of the hip: A systematic review and pooled analysis. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B:578–82.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×