Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T03:25:41.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4.4 - Strength-Based Approaches to Addiction Recovery and Desistance from Crime

Broadening the Base for Community Engagement

from Part IV - Interventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2021

Jennifer M. Brown
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Miranda A. H. Horvath
Affiliation:
University of Suffolk
Get access

Summary

This chapter reviews substance misuse services in the UK in the context of change from market led to community-based approaches and presents what is known about what initiates, supports and sustains the process of recovery, desistance from offending and community re-integration.We also review the impact on service delivery, in a policy environment that has championed peer and mutual aid processes, and parallel this with an initiative deploying a similar model around violence reduction.We conclude with reflections on what the fields of recovery and substance misuse services can offer to the design and delivery of wider public services, and how developing recovery-oriented systems of care can inform the building of flourishing communities in which individual recovery capital is seen to generate and sustain community capital and community connections, that act at an individual level as well as being a preventative early intervention at the level of communities.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Best, D. (2019). Pathways to desistance and recovery: The role of the social contagion of hope. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Best, D., Irving, J. & Albertson, K. (2016). Recovery and desistance: What the emerging recovery movement in the drug and alcohol area can learn from models of desistance from offending, Addiction Research and Theory, 25 (1): 110. DOI: 10.1080/16066359.2016.1185661Google Scholar
Best, D. & Laudet, A. (2010). The Potential of Recovery Capital, London: RSA.Google Scholar
Betty Ford Institute Consensus Group. (2007). What is recovery? A working definition from the Betty Ford Institute, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33, 221228.Google Scholar
Boylorn, R. (2008). Lived experience. In Given, L. M. (ed.) The sage encyclopaedia of qualitative research methods, Vol. 2, (p. 490). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Broome, S., Gekoski, A., and Choak, C. (2021). Evaluation of the bedfordshire violence and exploitation reduction unit. Brighton: Broome|Gekoski.Google Scholar
Broome, S. (2012) Social sentencing. RSA Journal, Spring, p.15. Available at: www.thersa.org/globalassets/pdfs/journals/spring-2012.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cano, I., Best, D., Beckwith, M., Phillips, L. A., Hamilton, P., & Sloan, J. (2019). Stigma related to health conditions and offending behaviors: Social distance among students of health and social sciences. Stigma and health. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/sah0000165Google Scholar
Carter, P. (2003) Managing offenders, reducing crime: a new approach. London: Home Office Strategy Unit Centre for Social Justice (2017) What happened to the Rehabilitation Revolution? How sentencers can revive it, How it can be helped by a hung Parliament London: Centre for Social Justice. [Available at: www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/core/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/CSJJ5667-Rehab-Revolution-WEB.pdf]Google Scholar
Dagger, R. (1997). Civic virtues – Rights, citizenship, and republican liberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, M., Scott, C. & Laudet, A. (2014). Beyond bricks and mortars: Recent research on substance abuse disorder recovery management, Current Psychiatry Report, 16(4), 17.Google Scholar
Galston, W. (2005). The practice of liberal pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Granfield, R. & Cloud, W. (2001). Social context and “natural recovery”: The role of social capital in the resolution of drug-associated problems, Substance Use and Misuse, 36, 15431570.Google Scholar
HM Government. (2017). 2017 Drug strategy. HM Government: London.Google Scholar
HM Government. (2010). Drug strategy 2010: Reducing demand, restricting supply, building recovery: Supporting people to live a drug-free life. HM Government: London.Google Scholar
Home Office. (2019a). Drugs Misuse: Findings from the 2018/19 Crime survey for England and Wales – Statistical bulletin: 21/19. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/832533/drug-misuse-2019-hosb2119.pdfGoogle Scholar
Home Office. (2019b). Policing Minister confirms £35 million for 18 Police and Crime Commissioners (PCCs) to set up Violence Reduction Units. London: UK Government.Google Scholar
Home Office. (2012). Putting full recovery first. HM Government: LondonGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, K. & Lembke, A. (2013). Recovery-oriented policy and care systems in the United Kingdom and United States, Drug and Alcohol Review, 33(1), 1318.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. F. & Yeterian, J. D. (2008). Mutual-help groups. In O’Donohue, W. & Cunningham, J. R. (eds), Evidence-Based Adjunctive Treatments, New York: Elsevier, pp. 61105.Google Scholar
Leamy, M., Bird, V., Le Boutillier, C., Williams, J. & Slade, M. (2011). A conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: Systematic review and narrative synthesis, British Journal of Psychiatry, 199, 445–52.Google Scholar
Lent, A. & Studdert, J. (2019). The Community Paradigm – Why public services need radical change and how it can be achieved. London: New Local Government Network. Available at: www.nlgn.org.uk/public/wp-content/uploads/The-Community-Paradigm_FINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, C. (2010 ). Sinning and sinned against: The stigmatisation of problem drug users. London: UKDPC. Available at: www.ukdpc.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/Policy%20report%20-%20Sinning%20and%20sinned%20against_%20the%20stigmatisation%20of%20problem%20drug%20users.pdfGoogle Scholar
Maruna, S. (2012). Elements of successful desistance signalling, Criminology and Public Policy, 11(1), 7386.Google Scholar
Maruna, S. (2001) Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Maruna, S. & Farrall, S. (2004). Desistance from crime: A theoretical reformulation, Kolner Zeitschrift fur Sozologie und Sozialpsychologie, 43: 171194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, F. (2014). Discovering desistance: Three aspects of desistance? http://blogs.irss.org.uk/discoveringdesistance/2014/05/23/three-aspects-of-desistance/Google Scholar
Merrall, E., Kariminia, A., Binswanger, I., Hobbs, M., Farrell, M., Marsden, J., Hutchinson, S., & Bird, S. (2010). Meta-analysis of drug-related deaths soon after release from prison. Addiction 105 (9), 15451554.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. (2013). Transforming rehabilitation: A revolution in the way we manage offenders Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/228580/8517.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Justice. (2010). Breaking the cycle: Effective punishment, rehabilitation and sentencing of offenders. Available at: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20111206103817/http://www.justice.gov.uk/consultations/docs/breaking-the-cycle.pdfGoogle Scholar
O’Dwyer, E. (2020). COVID-19 mutual aid groups have the potential to increase intergroup solidarity – but can they actually do so? London: LSE British Politics and Policy. Available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/covid19-mutual-aid-solidarity/Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics. (2019). Deaths related to drug poisoning in England and Wales: 2018 registrations. Available at: www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsrelatedtodrugpoisoninginenglandandwales/2018registrationsGoogle Scholar
Rowson, J., Broome, S., & Jones, A. (2010). Connected communities – How social networks power and sustain the Big Society. London: RSA. Available at ww.thersa.org/globalassets/pdfs/reports/connectedcommunities_report_150910.pdfGoogle Scholar
Scottish Government. (2018). Rights, respect and recovery: Alcohol and drug treatment strategy. Available www.gov.scot/publications/rights-respect-recovery/.Google Scholar
Scottish Government. (2008). Road to recovery: A new approach to tacking Scotland’s drug problem. Scottish Executive: Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Scottish VRU. (2020). Violence in preventable – not inevitable. Glasgow: Scottish VRU. Available www.svru.co.ukGoogle Scholar
Shift Design. (2019) Case study: Scottish violence reduction unit. London: Shift Design. Available at: https://shiftdesign.org/case-study-svru/Google Scholar
Staszak, J. (2009). Other/Otherness. In Kitchin, R. & Thrift, N. (Ed.) International encyclopaedia of human geography: A 12-volume set. Oxford : Elsevier Science. www.unige.ch/sciences-societe/geo/files/3214/4464/7634/OtherOtherness.pdfGoogle Scholar
UK Drug Policy Commission (UKDPC) (2010). Getting Serious about Stigma: the problem with stigmatising drug users –An overview. London: UKDPC. Available at: www.ukdpc.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/Policy%20report%20-%20Getting%20serious%20about%20stigma_%20the%20problem%20with%20stigmatising%20drug%20users.pdfGoogle Scholar
UK Drug Policy Commission (UKDPC) (2008). The UK drug policy commission recovery consensus group: A vision of recovery, London: UK Drug Policy Commission.Google Scholar
Violence Prevention Alliance. (2020). The public health approach. Geneva: World Health Organisation. Available www.who.int/violenceprevention/approach/public_health/en/Google Scholar
The Well. (2016). Annual report 2016. Barrow-in-Furness: The Well.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×