Book contents
- Higher Education Admissions Practices
- Educational and Psychological Testing in a Global Context
- Higher Education Admissions Practices
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Series Editor’s Foreword
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Global Challenges and Common Admissions Models
- Part II Country-Specific Admissions Practices
- Chapter 7 Admissions Policies and Practices and the Reshaping of Access Patterns to Higher Education in Africa
- Chapter 8 Chile’s Admissions Tests: Pending Changes and Revisions
- Chapter 9 Issues of Perceived Fairness in Admissions Assessments in Small Countries: The Case of the Republic of Cyprus
- Chapter 10 Higher Education Admissions Practices in Israel
- Chapter 11 Access, Equity, and Admissions in South African Higher Education
- Chapter 12 Admissions Practices in Sweden
- Chapter 13 Revisions of Admissions Testing in Vietnam: From Elite to Mass Higher Education
- Part III Assessments Used in Higher Education Admissions
- Part IV Rethinking Higher Education Admissions
- Index
- References
Chapter 12 - Admissions Practices in Sweden
from Part II - Country-Specific Admissions Practices
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 January 2020
Book contents
- Higher Education Admissions Practices
- Educational and Psychological Testing in a Global Context
- Higher Education Admissions Practices
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Series Editor’s Foreword
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Global Challenges and Common Admissions Models
- Part II Country-Specific Admissions Practices
- Chapter 7 Admissions Policies and Practices and the Reshaping of Access Patterns to Higher Education in Africa
- Chapter 8 Chile’s Admissions Tests: Pending Changes and Revisions
- Chapter 9 Issues of Perceived Fairness in Admissions Assessments in Small Countries: The Case of the Republic of Cyprus
- Chapter 10 Higher Education Admissions Practices in Israel
- Chapter 11 Access, Equity, and Admissions in South African Higher Education
- Chapter 12 Admissions Practices in Sweden
- Chapter 13 Revisions of Admissions Testing in Vietnam: From Elite to Mass Higher Education
- Part III Assessments Used in Higher Education Admissions
- Part IV Rethinking Higher Education Admissions
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter describes the admission system to higher education in Sweden. It focuses on the instruments used in the selection –upper secondary grades and scores from the admissions test called the SweSAT. The Swedish educational system has a high degree of centralization. In addition, there is a strong belief in opportunities, lifelong learning, and second chances, all of which influence the educational system in numerous ways. The chapter first describes higher education institutions in Sweden and this is followed by discussions of admissions regulations and the selection criteria. Finally, various reform efforts are described.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Higher Education Admissions PracticesAn International Perspective, pp. 203 - 216Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Andersson, H. (1999). Varför betyg? Historiskt och aktuellt om betyg [Why grades? Grades in past and present]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Björklund, A., Fredriksson, P., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Öckert, B. (2010). Den svenska utbildningspolitikens arbetsmarknadseffekter: vad säger forskningen? [Labor market effects of the Swedish educational policy: What does the research say?] (IFAU Rapport 2010:13). Uppsala: Institutet för arbetsmarknadspolitisk utvärdering.Google Scholar
Bron, A., & Agelli, K. (2000). Nontraditional students in higher education in Sweden: From recurrent education to lifelong learning. In Schuetze, H. G. & Slowley, M. (Eds.). Higher education and lifelong learners: International perspectives on change (pp. 83–100). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cliffordson, C. (2006). Selection effects on applications and admissions to medical education with regular and step‐wise admission procedures. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50, 463–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600823811.Google Scholar
Cliffordson, C. (2008). Differential prediction of study success across academic programs in the Swedish context: The validity of grades and tests as selection instruments for higher education. Educational Assessment 13(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627190801968240.Google Scholar
Cliffordson, C., & Askling, B. (2006). Different grounds for admission: Its effects on recruitment and achievement in medical education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50, 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830500372026.Google Scholar
Diskrimineringslag [Discrimination Act]. (2008). SFS 2008:567. Stockholm: KulturdepartementetGoogle Scholar
Förordning om försöksverksamhet med viktat högskoleprovsresultat vid urval [Ordinance Regarding Trials on Weighting SweSAT Scores for Selection]. (2018). SFS 2018:1511. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.Google Scholar
Hauschildt, K., Vögtle, E. M., & Gwosć, C. (2018). Social and economic conditions of student life in Europe: Eurostudent VI (2016–2018) synopsis of indicators. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/epale/en/resource-centre/content/eurostudent-vi-2016-2018-synopsis-indicators.Google Scholar
Högskoleförordning [Higher Education Ordinance]. (1993). SFS 1993:100. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.Google Scholar
Högskolelag [Higher Education Act]. (1992). SFS 1992:1434. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.Google Scholar
Husén, T., & Härnqvist, K. (2000). Begåvningsreserven En återblick på ett halvsekels forskning och debatt [The ability reserve: A look back at half a century of research and debate]. Uppsala: Föreningen för svensk undervisningshistoria.Google Scholar
Klapp Lekholm, A. (2008). Grades and grade assignment: Effects of student and school characteristics (Doctoral dissertation). Gothenburg University.Google Scholar
Lundahl, L., Erixon Arreman, I., Lundström, U., & Rönnberg, L. (2010). Setting things right? Swedish upper secondary school reform in a 40-year perspective. European Journal of Education, 45, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01414.x.Google Scholar
Lyrén, P.-E. (2009). Reporting subscores from college admission tests. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(4). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=14&n=4.Google Scholar
Lyrén, P.-E. (2017). Högskoleprovet våren och hösten 2016: Provtagargruppens sammansättning och resultat [The SweSAT in the spring and fall of 2016: Composition and results of the test-taking group] (BVM No. 65). Umeå: Department of Applied Educational Science, Umeå University.Google Scholar
Lyrén, P.-E., Rolfsman, E., Wedman, J., Wikström, C., & Wikström, M. (2014). Det nya högskoleprovet: samband mellan provresultat och prestation i högskolan [The new SweSAT: Association between test results and performance in higher education]. Umeå: Department of Applied Educational Science, Umeå University.Google Scholar
Öckert, B. (2001). Effects of higher education and the role of admission selection (Doctoral dissertation). Stockholm: The Swedish Institute for Social Research at Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Improving schools in Sweden: An OECD perspective. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/edu/school/Improving-Schools-in-Sweden.pdf.Google Scholar
Proposition 2017/18:204. (2017). Fler vägar till kunskap: en högskola för livslångt lärande [More routes to knowledge: A higher education for lifelong learning].Google Scholar
Schuetze, H. G., & Slowley, M. (2002). Participation and exclusion: A comparative analysis of non-traditional students and lifelong learners in higher education. Higher Education, 44, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1023%2FA%3A1019898114335.Google Scholar
Sinharay, S., Haberman, S. J., & Wainer, H. (2011). Do adjusted subscores lack validity? Don’t blame the messenger. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 789–797. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410391782.Google Scholar
Sinharay, S., Puhan, G., & Haberman, S. J. (2010). Reporting diagnostic scores in educational testing: Temptations, pitfalls, and some solutions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 553–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2010.483382789–797.Google Scholar
Statens offentliga utredningar. (2017). Tillträde för nybörjare: ett öppnare och enklare system för tillträde till högskoleutbildning [Admission for new entrants: A more open and simple system for admission to higher education] (Statens offentliga utredningar, 2017:20). Stockholm: Wolters Kluver.Google Scholar
Stenlund, T., Eklöf, H., & Lyrén, P.-E. (2017). Group differences in test-taking behaviour: An example from a high-stakes testing program. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24, 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1142935.Google Scholar
Stenlund, T., Lyrén, P.-E., & Eklöf, H. (2018). The successful test-taker: Exploring test-taking behaviour profiles through cluster analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33, 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212–017-0332-2.Google Scholar
Universitetskanslerämbetet. (n.d.). Facts about higher education. Retrieved from http://english.uka.se/facts-about-higher-education.html.Google Scholar
Universitets- och högskolerådet. (2016). Tabell för områdesbehörigheter [Table for field-specific requirements]. Retrieved from www.uhr.se/globalassets/_uhr.se/studier-och-antagning/tilltrade-till-hogskolan/tabell-for-omradesbehorigheter-2016.pdf.Google Scholar
Vlachos, J. (2018). Trust-based evaluation in a market-oriented school system (Working Paper 1217). Stockholm: Research Institute of Industrial Economics. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/183446.Google Scholar
Wedman, J. (2017). Theory and validity evidence for a large-scale test (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-138492.Google Scholar
Wedman, J. (2018). Reasons for gender-related differential item functioning in a college admissions test. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62, 959–970. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1402365.Google Scholar
Wedman, J., & Lyrén, P.-E. (2015). Methods for examining the psychometric quality of subscores: A review and application. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 20(21). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=20&n=21.Google Scholar
Wikström, C. (2005). Grade stability in a criterion‐referenced grading system: The Swedish example. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 12, 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940500143811.Google Scholar
Wikström, C., & Wikström, M. (2005). Grade inflation and school competition: An empirical analysis based on the Swedish upper secondary schools. Economics of Education Review, 24, 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.04.010.Google Scholar
Wikström, C., & Wikström, M. (2017). Group differences in student performance in the selection to higher education: Tests vs. grades. Frontiers in Education, 2(45). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00045.Google Scholar
Wolming, S., & Wikström, C. (2010). The concept of validity in theory and practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17, 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695941003693856.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by