Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2018
Edited by
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Neurolaw and Responsibility for ActionConcepts, Crimes, and Courts, pp. 267 - 290Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Abend, Gabriel ‘What Are Neural Correlates Neural Correlates of?’ (2016) BioSocieties 12(3), 1–24.Google Scholar
Aguilar, Jesus, and Buckareff, Andrei (eds.) Causing Human Actions: New Perspectives on the Causal Theory of Action (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010), pp. 27–43.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. (DSM 5) (Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association).Google Scholar
Anon ‘This Machine Records All Your Thoughts’ (1919) The Syracuse Herald Available at: www.paleo-future.blogspot.nl/2007/05/this-machine-records-all-your-thoughts.html.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M., and Geach, P. Descartes: Philosophical Writings (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1954).Google Scholar
Arico, Adam J., and Fallis, Don. ‘Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics: An Empirical Investigation of the Concept of Lying’ (2013) Philosophical Psychology 26 790–816.Google Scholar
Asp, P. ‘Previous Convictions and Proportionate Punishment under Swedish Law’ in Roberts, J. and Von Hirsch, A. (eds.) Previous Convictions at Sentencing (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010), pp. 207–26.Google Scholar
Austin, John. Lectures on Jurisprudence, Or, The Philosophy of Positive Law (London: J. Murray, 1869), Lecture XVIII.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind (Learning, Development and Conceptual Change) (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Bechara, Antoine, Damasio, Antonio, Damasio, Hanna, and Anderson, Steven. ‘Insensitivity to Future Consequences Following Damage to Human Prefrontal Cortex’ (1994) Cognition 50, 7–15.Google Scholar
Bechtel, William. Mental Mechanisms: Philosophical Perspectives on Cognitive Neuroscience (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2007).Google Scholar
Bennett, M. R., and Hacker, P. M. S. Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003).Google Scholar
Ben-Shakhar, G. ‘Effects of Mental Countermeasures on Psychophysiological Detection in the Guilty Knowledge Test’ (1991) International Journal of Psychophysiology 11(2), 99–108.Google Scholar
Ben-Shakhar, G. ‘A Critical Review of the Control Questions Test’ in Kleiner, M. (ed.) Handbook of Polygraph Testing (London: Academic Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Ben-Shakhar, G., and Dolev, K. ‘Psychophysiological Detection through the Guilty Knowledge Technique: Effects of Mental Countermeasures’ (1996) Journal of Applied Psychology 81(3), 273–81.Google Scholar
Birbaumer, N., Veit, R., Lotze, M., et al. ‘Deficient Fear Conditioning in Psychopathy: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study’ (2005) Archives of General Psychiatry 62(7), 799–805.Google Scholar
Blair, J., Mitchell, D., and Blair, K. The Psychopath: Emotion and the Brain (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005).Google Scholar
Blair, R. J. R., Colledge, E., Murray, L., and Mitchell, D. G. V. ‘A Selective Impairment in the Processing of Sad and Fearful Expressions in Children with Psychopathic Tendencies’ (2001) Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 29(6), 491–8.Google Scholar
Blair, R. J. R., Mitchell, D. G. V., Leonard, A., Budhani, S., Peschardt, K. S., and Newman, C. ‘Passive Avoidance Learning in Individuals with Psychopathy: Modulation by Reward but Not by Punishment’ (2004) Personality and Individual Differences 37(6), 1179–92.Google Scholar
Blair, R. J. R., Peschardt, K. S., Budhani, S., Mitchell, D. G. V., and Pine, D. S. ‘The Development of Psychopathy’ (2006) Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 47(3–4), 262–76.Google Scholar
Blodwell, J. ‘Physicalism and Emergence’ (2011) Journal of Consciousness Studies 18, 6–31.Google Scholar
Blum, G. S. Psychodynamics: The Science of Unconscious Mental Forces. (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 1968).Google Scholar
Blume, C., del Giudice, R., Wislowska, M., Lechinger, J., and Schabus, M. ‘Across the Consciousness Continuum – from Unresponsive Wakefulness to Sleep’ (2015) Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9, 1–14.Google Scholar
Bonta, J., and Andrews, D. The Psychology of Criminal Conduct (London: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar
Bostrom, N., and Ord, T. ‘The Reversal Test: Eliminating Status Quo Bias in Applied Ethical Reasoning’ (2006) Ethics 116, 656–79.Google Scholar
Bratman, M. Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Brinkmann, Sevend ‘Mental Life in the Space of Reasons’ (2006) Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 36, 1.Google Scholar
Brown, Teneille, and Murphy, Emily ‘Through a Scanner Darkly: Functional Neuroimaging as Evidence of a Criminal Defendant’s Past Mental States’ (2012) Stanford Law Review 62, 1119–208.Google Scholar
Bublitz, J.-C. ‘My Mind Is Mine?! Cognitive Liberty as a Legal Concept’ in Hildt, E. and Francke, A. (eds.) Cognitive Enhancement (New York: Springer, 2013).Google Scholar
Buckholtz, Joshua W., and Faigman, David L. ‘Promises, Promises for Neuroscience and Law’ (2014) Current Biology 24(3), 437–40.Google Scholar
Burns, Jeffrey, and Swerdlow, Russell ‘Right Orbitofrontal Tumor with Pedophilia Symptom and Constructional Apraxis Sign’ (2003) Archives of General Neurology 60, 437–40.Google Scholar
Byrne, A. J., Sellen, A. J., and Jones, J. G. ‘Errors on Anaesthetic Record Charts as a Measure of Anaesthetic Performance during Simulated Critical Incidents’ (1998) British Journal of Anaesthesiology 80(1), 58–62.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, John, and Moore, Michael ‘Decisions and Intentions Working Group Paper No. 1,’ MacArthur Foundation Project on Law and Neuroscience, 2008.Google Scholar
Caruso, G. Free Will and Consciousness: A Determinist Account of the Illusion of Free Will (Langham, MD: Lexington Books, 2012).Google Scholar
Caruso, G. ‘Free Will Eliminativism: Reference, Error, and Phenomenology’ (2015) Philosophical Studies 172(10), 2823–33.Google Scholar
Caruso, G. ‘Free Will Skepticism and Criminal Behavior: A Public Health-Quarantine Model’ (2016) Southwest Philosophy Review 32(1), 24–48.Google Scholar
The Case of Edmund Peacham (1615) 2 How. St. Tr. 869.Google Scholar
Chabris, C. F., and Simons, D. J. The Invisible Gorilla: Thinking Clearly in a World of Illusions (New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2010).Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. ‘Facing up to the Problem of Consciousness’ (1995) 2 Journal of Consciousness Studies 200–19.Google Scholar
Changeux, Jean-Pierre. The Good, the True and the Beautiful: A Neuronal Approach (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick ed., Realism and the Background of Phenomenology (Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind-Brain, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. ‘Moral Decision-Making and the Brain,’ in Illes, Judy (ed.), Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005),Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. ‘Of Brains & Minds: An Exchange’ (June 19, 2014) New York Review of Books, at www.nybooks.com/articles/2014/06/19/brains-and-minds-exchange/.Google Scholar
Churchland, Paul ‘Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes,’ (1981) Journal of Philosophy 78, 67–90.Google Scholar
Churchland, P., and Churchland, P. S. On the Contrary: Critical Essays, 1987–1997 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Copas, J. B. Statistical Analysis for a Risk of Reconviction Predictor (1992) Report to the Home Office. University of Warwick: unpublished.Google Scholar
Corcoran, K. J. ‘The Trouble with Searle’s Biological Naturalism.’ (2001) Erkentnis 55 (3).Google Scholar
Cornell, D. G., Warren, J., Hawk, G., Stafford, E., Oram, G., and Pine, D. ‘Psychopathy in Instrumental and Reactive Violent Offenders’ (1996) Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(4), 783–90Google Scholar
Cornet, L., Kogel, C., Nijman, H., Raine, A., and Laan, P. ‘Neurobiological Changes after Intervention in Individuals with Antisocial Behaviour: A Literature Review’ (2015) Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 25(1), 10–27.Google Scholar
Covey, R. ‘Signaling and Plea Bargaining’s Innocence Problem’ (2009). Washington and Lee Law Review 66, 73–130.Google Scholar
Cowen, R. et al., ‘Assessing Pain Objectively: The Use of Physiological Markers’ (2015) Anaesthesia 70(7), 828–47.Google Scholar
Crane, T. ‘Mental Causation’ in Nadel, L. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science (New York: Wiley, 1995).Google Scholar
Craver, Carl. Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Crick, Francis. The Astonishing Hypothesis: The Scientific Search for the Soul. (London: Touchstone Books, 1995).Google Scholar
Crick, N. R., and Dodge, K. A. ‘Social Information-Processing Mechanisms in Reactive and Proactive Aggression’ (1996) Child Development 67(3), 993–1002.Google Scholar
Crockett, M et al., ‘Serotonin Selectively Influences Moral Judgment and Behavior through Effects on Harm Aversion’ (2010) Psychological and Cognitive Sciences 107 (40), 17433.Google Scholar
Cui, Qian et al. ‘Detection of Deception Based on fMRI Activation Patterns Underlying the Production of a Deceptive Response and Receiving Feedback about the Success of the Deception after a Mock Murder Crime’ (2013) Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 9(10), 1472–81.Google Scholar
Dadds, M., Moul, C., Cauchi, A., Dobson-Stone, C., Hawes, D., Brennan, J., and Ebstein, R. ‘Methylation of the Oxytocin Receptor Gene and Oxytocin Blood Levels in the Development of Psychopathy’ (2014) Development and Psychopathology 26(1), 33.Google Scholar
Danaher, J. ‘Scientific Evidence and the Criminal Law: Lessons from Brain-Based Lie Detection’ (2010) Judicial Studies Institute Journal 10(1), 94.Google Scholar
Danaher, J. ‘The Future of Brain-Based Lie Detection and the Admissibility of Scientific Evidence’ (2011) Irish Criminal Law Journal 21(4), 67–76.Google Scholar
Danaher, J. ‘The Comparative Advantages of Brain-Based Lie Detection: The P300 Concealed Information Test and Pre-Trial Bargaining’ (2015a) International Journal of Evidence and Proof 19(1), 52–66.Google Scholar
Danaher, J. ‘Responsible Innovation in Social Epistemic Systems: The P300 Memory Detection Test and the Legal Trial’ in Koops, B.-J. et al. (eds.) Responsible Innovation Volume II: Concepts, Approaches, Applications (Dordrecht: Springer, 2015b).Google Scholar
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc. 509 U.S. 579 (1993).Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. ‘Actions, Reasons, and Causes’ (1963) The Journal of Philosophy (60) 685–700.Google Scholar
Davis, N. and Koningsbruggen, M. ‘Non-Invasive’ Brain Stimulation Is Not Non-Invasive’ (2013) Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 7(76), 1–4.Google Scholar
Davis, N., Tomlinson, S. P., and Morgan, H. M. ‘The Role of Beta-Frequency Oscillations in Motor Control’ (2012) Journal of Neuroscience (32), 403–4.Google Scholar
De Ganck, J., and Vanheule, S. ‘Bad Boys Don’t Cry’: A Thematic Analysis of Interpersonal Dynamics in Interview Narratives of Young Offenders with Psychopathic Traits’ (2015) Frontiers in Psychology (6) 960.Google Scholar
Denson, E. F. et al. ‘The Angry Brain: Neural Correlates of Anger, Angry Rumination, and Aggressive Personality’ (2009) Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21(4), 734–44.Google Scholar
De Ridder, D., Langguth, B., Plazier, M., and Menovsky, T. ‘Moral Dysfunction: Theoretical Model and Potential Neurosurgical Treatments’ in Verplaetse, J., Vanneste, S., Braeckman, J., and Schrijver, J. (eds.) The Moral Brain: Essays on the Evolutionary and Neuroscientific Aspects of Morality (New York: Springer, 2009), pp. 155–84.Google Scholar
Dodge, K. A., and Coie, J. D. ‘Social-Information-Processing Factors in Reactive and Proactive Aggression in Children’s Peer Groups’ (1987) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1146–58.Google Scholar
Dolan, B., and Coid, J. ‘Psychopathic and Antisocial Personality Disorders: Treatment and Research Issues’ (Gaskell/Royal College of Psychiatrists 1993).Google Scholar
Donald, B., and Bakies, E. ‘A Glimpse Inside the Brain’s Black Box: Understanding the Role of Neuroscience in Criminal Sentencing’ (2016) Fordham Law Review 85, 481–502.Google Scholar
Donnelly-Lazarov, , A Philosophy of Criminal Attempts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Donnelly-Lazarov, , ‘Intention in Criminal Law: The Challenge from Non-Observational Knowledge,’ (2017) Ratio Juris.Google Scholar
Donnelly-Lazarov, , ‘What it means to be responsible for action: Mind and Movement in Criminal Law’ (2017) Journal of Law Information and Science 25(3).Google Scholar
Donnelly-Lazarov, , ‘Intention in Criminal Law: the Challenge from Non-Observational Knowledge’ (2017) Ratio Juris 30(4), 451–70.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Dunne v Kier Group [2000] C.L.Y. 326.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. ‘What Is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare’ (1981a) Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10(3), 185–246.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. ‘What Is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources’ (1981b) Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10(4), 283–345.Google Scholar
Eccles, John ‘The Initiation of Voluntary Movements by the Supplementary Motor Area’ (1982) Archives of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences 231, 423–39.Google Scholar
Egan, G. et al. ‘Neural Correlates of the Consciousness of the Emergence of Thirst’ (2003) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100(25), 15241–6.Google Scholar
Fagan, T., Hirstein, W., and Sifferd, K. ‘Innocent Minds: Child Soldiers, Executive Functions, and Culpability’ (2016) International Criminal Law Review 16(2), 258–86.Google Scholar
Fallis, Don. ‘Lying as a Violation of Grice’s First Maxim of Quality’ (2012) Dialectica 66(4), 563–81.Google Scholar
Farah, M., and Hook, C. ‘The Seductive Allure of “Seductive Allure”’ (2013) Perspectives on Psychological Science 8, 88–90.Google Scholar
Farah, Martha J. et al. ‘Functional MRI-Based Lie Detection: Scientific and Societal Challenges’ (2014) Nature Reviews Neuroscience 15, 123–31.Google Scholar
Farrall, S., Hunter, B., Sharpe, G., and Calverley, A. Criminal Careers in Transition: The Social Context of Desistance from Crime (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Farwell, L. ‘Brain Fingerprinting: A Comprehensive Tutorial Review of Detection of Concealed Information with Event-Related Brain Potentials’ (2012) Cognitive Neurodynamics 6, 115–54.Google Scholar
Farwell, L., and Donchin, E. ‘The Truth Will Out: Interrogative Polygraphy (‘Lie Detection’) with Event Related Potentials’ (1991) Psychophysiology 28(5), 531–47.Google Scholar
Farwell, L., Richardson, D., and Richardson, G. ‘Brain Fingerprinting. Field Studies Comparing P300-MERMER and P300 Brainwave Responses in the Detection of Concealed Information’ (2013) Cognitive Neurodynamics 7(4), 263–99.Google Scholar
Farwell, L., and Smith, S. S. ‘Using Brain MERMER Testing to Detect Knowledge Despite Efforts to Conceal’ (2001) Journal of Forensic Science 46, 135–43.Google Scholar
Fecteau, S., Knoch, D., Fregni, F., Sultani, N., Boggio, P., and Pascual-Leone, A. ‘Diminishing Risk-Taking Behavior by Modulating Activity in the Prefrontal Cortex: A Direct Current Stimulation Study’ (2007) The Journal of Neuroscience 27 (46), 12500–5.Google Scholar
Feigl, Herbert et al., eds. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 2 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Ferari, P. et al., ‘Escalated Aggressive Behavior: Dopamine, Serotonin and GABA’ (2005) European Journal of Pharmacology 526(1–3), 51–64.Google Scholar
Field v Leeds City Council [2001] C.P.L.R. 129.Google Scholar
Filevich, E. et al. ‘Brain Correlates of Subjective Freedom of Choice’ (2013) Consciousness and cognition 22(4), 1271–84.Google Scholar
Fine, Kit. ‘Guide to Ground’ in Correia, F. and Schneider, B. (eds.) Metaphysical Grounding (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 37–80.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. M., and Ravizza, M. Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Fleischman, John. Phineas Gage: A Gruesome but True Story About Brain Science (New York: Houghton, Mifflin, 2002).Google Scholar
Focquaert, F. ‘Mandatory Neurotechnological Treatment: Ethical Issues’ (2014) Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35(1), 59–72.Google Scholar
Focquaert, F., and Schermer, M. ‘Moral Enhancement: Do Means Matter Morally?’ (2015) Neuroethics 8(2), 139–51.Google Scholar
Foddy, B., and Savulescu, J. ‘Addiction and Autonomy: Can Addicted People Consent to the Prescription of Their Drug of Addiction?’ (2006) Bioethics 20(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. ‘Special Sciences, or the Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis’ (1974) Synthese 28, 97–115.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. ‘Fodor’s Guide to Mental Representation: The Intelligent Auntie’s Vade-Mecum’ (1985) Mind 373, 76–100.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in The Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A., and Pylyshyn, Z. W., ‘Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis’ (1988) Cognition 28(1–2), 3–71.Google Scholar
Forth, A et al. The Psychopathy Checklist – Youth Version (Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems, 2003).Google Scholar
Fox, Dov, and Stein, Alex ‘Dualism and Doctrine’ in Patterson, Dennis and Pardo, Michael (eds.) Philosophical Foundations of Law and Neuroscience (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 126–35.Google Scholar
Frank, R. Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions (New York: W. W. Norton, 1988).Google Scholar
Frick, Paul quoted by Stenson, Jacqueline ‘Destined as a Psychopath: Experts Seek Clues,’ www.nbcnews.com/id/30267075/ns/health-mental_health/t/destined-psychopath-experts-seek-clues/#.WPKnao61sXo Last accessed 15/04/17.Google Scholar
Frick, P., and Hare, R. The Anti-Social Process Screening Device (Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems, 2001).Google Scholar
Fumerton, Richard Knowledge, Thought, and the Case for Dualism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Furedy, J. J. ‘The ‘‘Control’’ Question ‘‘Test’’ (CQT) Polygrapher’s Dilemma: Logico-Ethical Considerations for Psychophysiological Practitioners and Researchers’ (1993) International Journal of Psychophysiology 15(3), 263–7.Google Scholar
Furedy, J., and Heselgrave, R. ‘The Validity of the Lie Detector: A Psychophysiological Perspective’ (1988) Criminal Justice and Behavior 15, 219–46.Google Scholar
Gamer, M. ‘Detecting of Deception and Concealed Information Using Neuroimaging Techniques’ in Verschuere, B., Ben-Shakhar, G., and Meijer, E. (eds.) Memory Detection: Theory and Application of Concealed Information Test (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1979).Google Scholar
Glannon, W. ‘Intervening in the Psychopath’s Brain’ (2014) Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35(1), 43–57.Google Scholar
Glenn, A. L. ‘The Other Allele: Exploring the Long Allele of the Serotonin Transporter Gene as a Potential Risk Factor for Psychopathy: A Review of the Parallels in Findings’ (2011) Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 35(3), 612–20.Google Scholar
Godman, M. and Jefferson, A. ‘On Blaming and Punishing Psychopaths’ (2017) Criminal Law and Philosophy 11(1), 127–42.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Gary ‘Supplementary Motor Area Structure and Function: Review and Hypotheses’ (1985) Behavioral and Brain Sciences (8), 567–88.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, 4th ed. (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1984).Google Scholar
Gopnick, A., and Wellman, H. M. ‘Why the Child’s Theory of Mind Really Is a Theory’ (1992) Mind & Language (7) 145–71.Google Scholar
Greely, Henry T. ‘Mind Reading, Neuroscience, and the Law’ in Morse, Stephen J. and Roskies, Adina L. (eds.) A Primer on Criminal Law and Neuroscience (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them (New York: The Penguin Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua and Cohen, Jonathan ‘For the Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything’ (2004) Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 359(1451), 1781–5.Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua and Cohen, Jonathan ‘For Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything’ in Zeki, S. and Goodenough, O. (eds.) Law and the Brain (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 207–26.Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua, and Paxton, Joseph M. ‘Patterns of Neural Activity Associated with Honest and Dishonest Moral Decisions’ (2009) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(6), 12506–11.Google Scholar
Gregory, S., Blair, R. J., Simmons, A., et al. ‘Punishment and Psychopathy: A Case-Control Functional MRI Investigation of Reinforcement Learning in Violent Antisocial Personality Disordered Men’ (2015) The Lancet Psychiatry 2(2), 153–60.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. ‘Method in Philosophical Psychology (From the Banal to the Bizarre)’ (1975) Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 48, 23–53.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. Human Nature: The Categorical Framework (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Hare, R. Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths among Us (New York: The Guilford Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Hare, R. The Hare Psychopathy Checklist Revised, 2nd ed. (Toronto: Multi-Health Systems, 2003).Google Scholar
Hare, R. D., and Neumann, C. N. ‘The PCL-R Assessment of Psychopathy: Development, Structural Properties, and New Directions’ in Patrick, C. (ed.) Handbook of Psychopathy (New York: Guilford, 2006).Google Scholar
Hare, Todd Camerer, Colin and Rangel, Antonio ‘Self-Control in Decision-Making Involves Modulation of the vmPFC System,’ (2009) Science, 646.Google Scholar
Harris, C., and Wolpert, D. ‘Signal-dependent Noise Determines Motor Planning’ (1998) Nature 394, 780–784.Google Scholar
Hauskeller, Michael (ed.) Moral Enhancement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Haynes, J.-D. ‘Brain Reading: Decoding Mental States from Brain Activity in Humans’ in Illes, J. and Sahakian, B. J. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Haynes, John-Dylan Sakai, Katsuyuki Rees, et al. ‘Reading Hidden Intentions in the Brain’ (2007) Current Biology 17 (2007) 323–328.Google Scholar
Henderson and others [2010] EWCA Crim 1269, [2010] 2 Cr App R 24.Google Scholar
Hirstein, W., and Sifferd, K. ‘The Legal Self: Executive Processes and Legal Theory’ (2011) Consciousness and Cognition 20(1), 156–71.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Douglas R., and Dennett, Daniel C. The Mind’s I (New York: Bantam Books, 1981).Google Scholar
Hollin, C., and Palmer, E. (eds.) Offending Behaviour Programmes (Chichester: Wiley, 2006).Google Scholar
Hooker, Clifford ‘Toward a General Theory of Reduction, Part I (1981) Dialogue 20(1), 38–59.Google Scholar
Hooker, Clifford ‘Toward a General Theory of Reduction, Part II (1981) Dialogue, 20(2), 201–36.Google Scholar
Hooker, Clifford ‘Toward a General Theory of Reduction, Part III (1981) Dialogue 20(3), 496–529.Google Scholar
Horgan, Terence ‘Nonreductive Physicalism and the Explanatory Autonomy of Psychology’ in Wagner, S. and Warner, R. (eds.) Naturalism: A Critical Appraisal (South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1993), pp, 295–320.Google Scholar
Horikawa, T. et al. ‘Neural Decoding of Visual Imagery during Sleep’ (2013) Science (New York, N.Y.) 639–42.Google Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer ‘Causality and the Mental’ (2015) Humana.Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies 29, 125–40.Google Scholar
H (Stephen) v The Queen [2014] EWCA Crim 1555.Google Scholar
Hu, X., Hegeman, D., Landry, E., and Rosenfeld, J. P. ‘Increasing the Number of Irrelevant Stimuli Increases Ability to Detect Countermeasures to the P300-based Complex Trial Protocol for Concealed Information Detection’ (2011) Psychophysiology 49(1), 85–95.Google Scholar
Hu, X., Pornpattananangkul, N., and Rosenfeld, J. P. ‘N200 and P300 as Orthogonal and Integrable Indicators of Distinct Awareness and Recognition Processes in Memory Detection’ (2013) Psychophysiology 50(5), 454–64.Google Scholar
Hu, X., and Rosenfeld, J. P. ‘Combining the P300-complex Trial-based Concealed Information Test and the Reaction Time- based Autobiographical Implicit Association Test in Concealed Memory Detection’ (2012) Psychophysiology 49(8), 1090–100.Google Scholar
Hubner, D., and White, L. ‘Neurosurgery for Psychopaths? An Ethical Analysis’ (2016) American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 7(3), 140–49.Google Scholar
Hughes, M., Dolan, M., and Stout, J. ‘Decision-making in Psychopathy’ (2015) Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 23(4), 521–37.Google Scholar
Huis in ‘t Veld, E. M. J., and de Gelder, B. ‘From Personal Fear to Mass Panic: The Neurological Basis of Crowd Perception Huis in ‘t Veld’ (2015) Human Brain Mapping 36(6), 2338–51.Google Scholar
Hulsman, R. L., Ros, W. J. G., Winnubst, J. A. M., and Bensing, J. M. ‘Teaching Clinically Experienced Physicians Communication Skills: A Review of Evaluation Studies’ (1999) Medical Education 33(9), 655–68.Google Scholar
Hursthouse, Rosalind ‘Intention’ (2000) Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 46, 83–105.Google Scholar
Huth, A. G. et al. ‘Natural Speech Reveals the Semantic Maps That Tile Human Cerebral Cortex’ (2016) Nature 532, 453–58.Google Scholar
Illes, J., Racine, E., and Kirschen, M., ‘A Picture Is Worth a 1000 Words, but Which 1000?’ in Illes, J. (ed.) Neuroethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Jackson, F., and Pettit, P. ‘In Defense of Folk Psychology’ (1990) Philosophical Studies 59, 31–54.Google Scholar
Jezzard, P., Matthews, P., and Smith, S. Functional MRI: An Introduction to Methods (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Jiang, W. et al., ‘Decoding the Processing of Lying Using Functional Connectivity MRI’ (2015) Behavioral and Brain Functions 11, 1.Google Scholar
Jiang, W. et al., ‘A Functional MRI Study of Deception among Offenders with Antisocial Personality Disorder’ (2013) Neuroscience 244, 90–8.Google Scholar
Jones, O., Buckholtz, J., Schall, J., and Marois, R. ‘Brain-Imaging for Legal Thinkers: A Guide for the Perplexed’ (2009) Stanford Technology Law Review 5 – available at: https://journals.law.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/stanford-technology-law-review/online/jones-brain-imaging.pdf (accessed 19/10/2016).Google Scholar
Kay, K. N. et al., ‘Identifying Natural Images from Human Brain Activity (2008) Nature 452(7185), 352–5.Google Scholar
Keil, Geert ‘Naturalism’ in Moran, Dermot (ed.) The Routledge Companion to Twentieth-Century Philosophy (London: Routledge, 2008), pp. 254–307.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. ‘Language and the Mind’ repr. in The Legacy of Wittgenstein (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984).Google Scholar
Kiehl, K., and Hoffman, M. B. ‘The Criminal Psychopath: History, Neuroscience, Treatment and Economics’ (2011) Jurimetrics 51, 355.Google Scholar
Kim, J. ‘The Myth of Nonreductive Materialism’ (1989) Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 63(3), 31–47.Google Scholar
Kim, J. ‘Events as Property Exemplification’ in Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Kim, J. Physicalism, or Something Near Enough (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005a).Google Scholar
Kim, J. ‘The Myth of Nonreductive Materialism’ in Moser, P. K. and Trout, J. D. (eds.) Contemporary Materialism (New York: Routledge, 2005b), pp. 134–49.Google Scholar
Kim, J. ‘The Very Idea of Token Physicalism’ in Gozzano, Simone and Hill, Christopher (eds.) New Perspectives on Type-Identity: The Mental and the Physical (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 167–85.Google Scholar
Klein, G. A. ‘A Recognition-Primed Decision (RPD) Model of Rapid Decision Making’ in Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., and Zsambok, C. E. (eds.) Decision Making in Action (Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing, 1993), pp. 138–47.Google Scholar
Klingberg, T. ‘Training and Plasticity of Working Memory’ (2010) Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14(7), 317–24.Google Scholar
Knill, D. C., and Pouget, A. ‘The Bayesian Brain: The Role of Uncertainty in Neural Coding and Computation’ (2004) Trends in Neurosciences 27, 712–719.Google Scholar
Kochanska, G., and Aksan, N. ‘Children’s Conscience and Self-Regulation’ (2006) Journal of Personality 74(6), 1587–618.Google Scholar
Kolb, B., Wishaw, I., and Campbell Tesky, G. An Introduction to Brain and Behavior, 5th ed. (New York: Worth Publishers, 2016).Google Scholar
Kolber, Adam J. ‘Will There Be a Neurolaw Revolution?’ (2014) Indiana Law Journal 85, 807–845.Google Scholar
Kolber, Adam J. ‘Free Will as a Matter of Law’ in Patterson, Dennis and Pardo, Michael S. (eds.) Philosophical Foundations of Law and Neuroscience (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Kosslyn, S., DiGirolamo, G., Thompson, W., and Alpert, N. ‘Mental Rotation of Objects versus Hands: Neural Mechanisms Revealed by Positron Emission Tomography’ (1998) Psychophysiology 35, 151–161.Google Scholar
Kozel, F. Andrew, Johnson, K. A., et al. ‘Functional MRI Detection of Deception after Committing a Mock Sabotage Crime’ (2009) Journal of Forensic Science 54, 220.Google Scholar
Kozel, F. Andrew, Laken, S. J., et al. ‘Replication of Functional MRI Detection of Deception’ (2009) Open Forensic Science Journal 2, 6.Google Scholar
Kozel, F. Andrew et al. ‘Detecting Deception Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imagining’ (2005) Biological Psychiatry 58, 605.Google Scholar
Kravitz, D. J., Saleem, K. S., Baker, C. I., Ungerleider, L. G., and Mishkin, M. ‘The Ventral Visual Pathway: An Expanded Neural Framework for the Processing of Object Quality’ (2013) Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17(1), 26–49.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Lamme, V. A. F. ‘What Introspection Has to Offer, and Where Its Limits Lie’ (2010) Cognitive Neuroscience 1(3), 232–40.Google Scholar
Law Commission’s Report ‘Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in England and Wales’ (2011) Law Com No 325.Google Scholar
Lee, D. N., and Reddish, P. ‘Plummeting Gannets: A Paradigm of Ecological Optics’ (1981) Nature 293, 293–94.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian, and Miller, Alexander ‘Closet Dualism and Mental Causation,’ (1998) Canadian Journal of Philosophy 28, 161–81.Google Scholar
Levy, Neil Consciousness and Moral Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014a).Google Scholar
Levy, Neil ‘Psychopaths and Blame: The Argument from Content’ (2014b) Philosophical Psychology 27, 351.Google Scholar
Lewis, David, ‘Reduction of Mind’ in Guttenplan, Samuel (ed.) A Companion to Philosophy of Mind (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1994).Google Scholar
Libet, B., Gleason, C. A., Wright, E. W., and Pearl, D. K. ‘Time of Conscious Intention to Act in Relation to Onset of Cerebral Activity (readiness-potential): The Unconscious Initiation of a Freely Voluntary Act’ (1983) Brain 106, 623–42.Google Scholar
Lopez, R., Poy, R., Patrick, C., and Molto, J. ‘Deficient Fear Conditioning and Self-Reported Psychopathy: The Role of Fearless Dominance’ (2013) Psychophysiology 50, 210–18.Google Scholar
Lösel, F. ‘The Efficacy of Correctional Treatment: A Review and Synthesis of Meta-Evaluations’ in McGuire, J. (ed.) What Works: Reducing Reoffending (Chichester: Wiley, 1995).Google Scholar
Lucas, J., Raynor, P., and Vanstone, M. Straight Thinking on Probation One Year On (Bridgend: Mid Glamorgan Probation Service, 1992).Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair Whose Justice, Which Rationality? (South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Mackenzie, R., and Watts, J. ‘Does Lack of a Moral Feeling Brain Indicate Moral Disability? Children Diagnosed with Callous Unemotional Traits, Emotion Regulation and the Potential of Treatment with Oxytocin’ (2012) Tizard Learning Disability Review 17(4), 184–93.Google Scholar
Maguire, M., and Raynor, P. ‘How the Resettlement of Prisoners Promotes Desistance from Crime: Or Does It?’ (2006) Criminology and Criminal justice 6(1), 19–38.Google Scholar
Maibom, H. L. ‘The Mad, the Bad, and the Psychopath’ (2008) Neuroethics, 1(3), 167–84.Google Scholar
Maibom, H. L. ‘To Treat a Psychopath’ (2014) 35 Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31.Google Scholar
Maryland v. Smith, Case No. 106589C (Maryland Cir. Ct. 201).Google Scholar
McCabe, D. P., and Castel, A. D. ‘Seeing Is Believing: The Effect of Brain Images on Judgments of Scientific Reasoning’ (2008) Cognition 107, 343–52.Google Scholar
McDonald, R., Dodson, M. C., Rosenfield, D., and Jouriles, E. N. ‘Effects of a Parenting Intervention on Features of Psychopathy in Children (2011) Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 39(7), 1013–23.Google Scholar
McGinn, C. ‘What Can Your Neurons Tell You?’ (July 11, 2013) New York Review of Books, at www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/07/11/what-can-your-neurons-tell-you/ (reviewing Jean-Pierre Changeux, The Good, the True and the Beautiful: A Neuronal Approach [2012]).Google Scholar
McIlwain, D. ‘Living Strangely in Time: Emotions, Masks and Morals in Psychopathically-Inclined People’ (2010) European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 6(1), 75.Google Scholar
McIvor, G., and McNeill, F. (eds.) Beyond the Risk Paradigm in Criminal Justice (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2016).Google Scholar
McMillan, J. ‘The Kindest Cut? Surgical Castration, Sex Offenders and Coercive Offers’ (2013) Journal of Medical Ethics 40(9), 583–90.Google Scholar
Mecacci, G., and Haselager, P. ‘Identifying Criteria for the Evaluation of the Implications of Brain Reading for Mental Privacy’ (2017) Science and Engineering Ethics 15.Google Scholar
Meegan, D. ‘Neuroimaging Techniques for Memory Detection’ (2008) American Journal of Bioethics 8, 9–20.Google Scholar
Meijer, E., Ben-Shakhar, G., Verschuere, B., and Donchin, E. ‘A Comment on Farwell (2012): Brain Fingerprinting: A Comprehensive Tutorial Review of Detection of Concealed Information with Event-related Brain Potentials’ (2013) Cognitive Neurodynamics 7(2), 155–8.Google Scholar
Meixner, J. ‘Liar, Liar, Jury’s the Trier’ (2012) Northwestern Law Review 106(3), 1451–88.Google Scholar
Meixner, J. ‘Applications of Neuroscience in Criminal Law: Legal and Methodological Issues’ (2015) Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 15(2), 513.Google Scholar
Meixner, J., and Rosenfeld, J. P. ‘Countermeasure Mechanisms in a P300-Based Concealed Information Test’ (2010) Psychophysiology 47(1), 57–65.Google Scholar
Meixner, J., and Rosenfeld, J. P. ‘Detecting Knowledge of Incidentally Acquired, Real-World Memories Using a P300-Based Concealed-Information Test’ (2015) Psychological Science 25(11), 1994–2005.Google Scholar
Menninger, K. et al. The Vital Balance: Life Process in Mental Health and Illnesses (New York: Viking Boks, 1963).Google Scholar
Mertens, R., and Allen, J. J. B. ‘The Role of Psychophysiology in Forensic Assessments: Deception Detection, ERPs and Virtual Reality Mock Crime Scenarios’ (2008) Psychophysiology 45, 286–98.Google Scholar
M’Naghten’s case (1843) 10 Cl & F 200.Google Scholar
Moore, M. ‘Renewed Questions about the Causal Theory of Action’ in Geach, Peter (ed.) Mental Acts (London: Routledge and Kegan-Paul, 1959).Google Scholar
Moore, M. Law and Psychiatry: Rethinking the Relationship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), pp. 224–28.Google Scholar
Moore, M. ‘Mind, Brain, and the Unconscious’ in Clarke, P. and Wright, C. (eds.) Mind, Psychoanalysis, and Science (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988).Google Scholar
Moore, M. Act and Crime: The Implications of the Philosophy of Action for Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, paperback edit. 2010).Google Scholar
Moore, M. Placing Blame: A General Theory of the Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Moore, M. ‘Moral Reality Revisited’ in Objectivity in Ethics and Law (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2004), pp. 193–201.Google Scholar
Moore, M. Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Moral, and Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Moore, M. ‘Libet’s Challenge(s) to Responsible Agency’ in Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter and Nadel, Lynn (eds.) Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 207–34.Google Scholar
Moore, M. ‘Responsible Choices, Desert-Based Legal Institutions, and the Challenge of Contemporary Neuroscience’ (2012a) Social Philosophy and Policy 29, 233–79.Google Scholar
Moore, M. ‘The Specialness of the General Part of the Criminal Law’ in Baker, Dennis (ed.) The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law: Essays in Honour of Glanville Williams (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012b), pp. 69–105.Google Scholar
Moore, M. ‘Compatibilism(s) for Neuroscientists’ in Villanueva, Enrique (ed.) Law and the Philosophy of Action (The Netherlands: Rodopi Philosophical Studies, 2014), pp. 1–59.Google Scholar
Moore, M. ‘Stephen Morse and the Fundamental Psycho-Legal Error’ (2016a) Criminal Law and Philosophy 10, 45–89.Google Scholar
Moore, M. ‘The Neuroscience of Volitional Excuse’ in Patterson, D. and Pardo, M. (eds.) Philosophical Foundations of Law and Neuroscience (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016b), pp. 179–230.Google Scholar
Moran, R., ‘Anscombe on “Practical Knowledge”’ in Hyman, J. and Steward, H. (eds.) Agency and Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. ‘Inevitable Mens Rea’ (2003) Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 27, 51–64.Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. ‘Criminal Responsibility and the Disappearing Person’ (2007) Cardozo Law Review 28, 2545–75.Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. ‘Determinism and the Death of Folk Psychology: Two Challenges to Responsibility from Neuroscience’ (2008a) Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 9, 1–36.Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. ‘Psychopathy and Criminal Responsibility’ (2008b) Neuroethics 1, 205.Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. ‘Lost in Translation? An Essay on Law and Neuroscience’ (2011a) Current Legal Issues 13, 529.Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. Neuroscience and the Future of Personhood and Responsibility’ in Rosen, J and Wittes, B eds. Constitution 3.0: Freedom and Technological Change (Washington, DC: Brookings, 2011b).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. ‘Neuroscience, Free Will, and Responsibility’ in Glannon, W. (ed.) Free Will and the Brain: Neuroscientific, Philosophical, and Legal Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J. ‘The Inevitable Mind in the Age of Neuroscience’ in Patterson, Dennis and Pardo, Michael S. (eds.) Philosophical Foundations of Law and Neuroscience (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Murray, D., and Nahmias, E. ‘Explaining Away Incompatibilist Intuitions’ (2014) Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88(2), 434–67.Google Scholar
Nachey, P., Wydell, H., O’Neil, K., Husain, M., and Kemard, C. ‘The Role of the Pre-Supplementary Motor Area in the Control of Actions’ (2007) Neuroimage 36, T155–T163.Google Scholar
Nadelhoffer, T., and Sinnott-Armstrong, W. P. ‘Is Psychopathy a Mental Disease?’ in Vincent, N. (ed.) Neuroscience and Legal Responsibility (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 229–55.Google Scholar
Nagel, E. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation (New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, 1961).Google Scholar
Nahmias, E., and Murray, D. ‘Experimental Philosophy on Free Will: An Error Theory for Incompatibilist Intuitions’ in Aguilar, J., Buckareff, A., and Frankish, K. (eds.) New Waves in Philosophy of Action (Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillian, 2010), pp. 189–215.Google Scholar
National Academies of the Sciences Report The Polygraph and Lie Detection (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Nelkin, D. K. ‘Psychopaths, Incorrigible Racists, and the Faces of Responsibility’ (2015) Ethics 125(2), 357–90.Google Scholar
Newman, J. et al., ‘Attention Moderates the Fearlessness of Psychopathic Offenders’ (2010) Biological Psychiatry 67, 66.Google Scholar
Ney, A. ‘Microphysical Causation and the Case for Physicalism’ (2016) Analytic Philosophy 57, 141–64.Google Scholar
Nichols, S., and Knobe, J. ‘Moral Responsibility and Determinism: The Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions’ (2007) Nous 41(4), 663–85.Google Scholar
Nichols, S., and Roskies, A. ‘Bringing Moral Responsibility Down to Earth’ (2008) Journal of Philosophy 105(7), 371–88.Google Scholar
Ofen, Noa et al., ‘Neural Correlates of Deception: Lying about Past Events and Personal Beliefs’ (2016) Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 12(1), 116–27.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Paul, and Putnam, Hilary ‘The Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis’ in Feigl, H. et al. (eds.) Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 2, (Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Papineau, David ‘Causation Is Macroscopic but Not Irreducible’ in Gibb, S., Lowe, E. J., and Ingthorsson, D., (eds.) Mental Causation and Ontology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Papineau, David ‘Naturalism’ in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/naturalism/, last accessed, September 9, 2014.Google Scholar
Pardo, Michael S., and Patterson, Dennis Minds, Brains, and Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Pardo, Michael S., and Patterson, Dennis ‘Morse, Mind, and Mental Causation’ (2014) Criminal Law and Philosophy 11(1), 111–26.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D. ‘Free Will Skepticism and Criminal Punishment’ in Nadelhoffer, T. (ed.) The Future of Punishment (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 49–78.Google Scholar
Pereboom, D., and Caruso, G. ‘Hard-Incompatibilist Existentialism: Neuroscience, Punishment, and Meaning in Life’ in Caruso, Gregg D. and Flanagan, Owen (eds.) Neuroexistentialism: Meaning, Morals, and Purpose in the Age of Neuroscience (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Peth, J. et al. Memory Detection Using fMRI – Does the Encoding Context Matter?’ (2015) NeuroImage 113, 164–74.Google Scholar
Plassmann, H. et al. ‘Marketing Actions Can Modulate Neural Representations of Experienced Pleasantness’ (2008) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105(3), 1050–4.Google Scholar
Pockett, Susan ‘The Neuroscience of Movement’ in Pockett, S., Banks, W. P., and Gallagher, S. (eds.) Does Consciousness Cause Behavior? (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Poeppl, T. B. et al. ‘Connectivity and Functional Profiling of Abnormal Brain Structures in Pedophilia’ (2015) Human Brain Mapping 36(16), 2374–86.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary ‘Psychological Predicates’ in Caplan, W. and Merrill, D. (eds.) Art, Mind, and Religion (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary Reason, Truth and History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”’ in Mind, Language, and Reality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
R. v Cannings [2004] 2 Cr App R 63.Google Scholar
R. v Gokal [1999] EWCA Crim 669.Google Scholar
R. v Hamilton [2014] EWCA Crim 1555.Google Scholar
R. v Reed and Reed, [2009] EWCA Crim 2698.Google Scholar
R. v Weller [2010] EWCA Crim 1085.Google Scholar
Raynor, P. ‘Is There Any Sense in Social Inquiry Reports?’ (1980) Probation Journal 27(3), 78–84.Google Scholar
Raynor, P. ‘Risk and Need Assessment in British Probation: The Contribution of LSI-R’ (2007) Psychology, Crime and Law 13(2), 125–38.Google Scholar
Raynor, P. ‘Consent to Probation in England and Wales: How It Was Abolished, and Why It Matters’ (2014) European Journal of Probation 6(3), 296–307.Google Scholar
Raynor, P. ‘Three Narratives of Risk: Corrections, Critique and Context’ in Trotter, C. et al. (eds.) Beyond the Risk Paradigm in Criminal Justice (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2016).Google Scholar
Raynor, P., and Robinson, G. Rehabilitation, Crime and Justice (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).Google Scholar
Reesu, G. V., and Brown, N. L. ‘Inconsistency in Opinions of Forensic Odontologists When Considering Bite Mark Evidence’ (2016) Forensic Science International 266, 263–70.Google Scholar
Reif, A., Rösler, M., Freitag, C. M., et al. ‘Nature and Nurture Predispose to Violent Behavior: Serotonergic Genes and Adverse Childhood Environment’ (2007) Neuropsychopharmacology 32(11), 2375–83.Google Scholar
Riemann, R., Angerleitner, A., and Strelau, J. ‘Genetic and Environmental Influences on Personality: A Study of Twins Reared Together Using the Self and Peer Report NEO-FFI Scales’ (1997) Journal of Personality 65, 449–75.Google Scholar
Risinger, D. Michael ‘Navigating Expert Reliability: Are Criminal Standards of Certainty Being Left on the Dock?’ (2000) Albany Law Review 64(1), 99–149.Google Scholar
Ronson, J. The Psychopath Test: A Journey through the Madness Industry (New York: Riverhead Books, 2012).Google Scholar
Rosen, Gideon ‘Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction’ in Hale, B. and Hoffmann, A. (eds.) Modality, Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 109–35.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, J. P. ‘Brain Fingerprinting: A Critical Analysis’ (2005) Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice 4, 20–37.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, J. P. ‘P300 in Detecting Concealed Information’ in Verschuere, B., Ben-Shakhar, G., and Meijer, E. (eds.) Memory Detection: Theory and Application of the Concealed Information Test (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, J. P., Hu, X., Labkovsky, E., Meixner, J., and Winograd, M. ‘Review of Recent Studies and Issues Regarding the P300-Based Complex Trial Protocol for Detection of Concealed Information’ (2013) International Journal of Psychophysiology 90(2), 118–34.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, J. P., Hu, X., and Pederson, K. ‘Deception Awareness Improves P300-Based Deception Detection in Concealed Information Tests’ (2012) International Journal of Psychophysiology 86, 114–21.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, J. P., Labkovsky, E., Winograd, M., et al. ‘The Complex Trial Protocol (CTP): A New, Countermeasure-Resistant, Accurate, P300-Based Method for the Detection of Concealed Information’ (2008) Psychophysiology 45(6), 906–19.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, J. P., Soskins, M., Bosh, G., and Ryan, A. ‘Simple, Effective Countermeasures to P300-Based Tests of Detection of Concealed Information’ (2004) Psychophysiology 41(2), 205–9.Google Scholar
Roskies, Adina L. ‘Don’t Panic: Self Authorship without Obscure Metaphysics’ (2012) Philosophical Perspectives 26, 323–42.Google Scholar
Roskies, Adina L. ‘Brain Imaging Techniques’ in Morse, Stephen J. and Roskies, Adina L. (eds.) A Primer on Criminal Law and Neuroscience (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 37–71.Google Scholar
Roskies, Adina L. ‘Decision-Making and Self-Governing Systems’ (2016) Neuroethics 1–13.Google Scholar
Roth, M., ‘CMU Knows What’s on Your Mind’ (2009) Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Available at: www.post-gazette.com/science/2009/01/04/CMU-knows-what-s-on-your-mind/stories/200901040263.Google Scholar
Rouse, Joseph ‘Social Practices and Normativity’ (2007) Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37(1), 49–53.Google Scholar
Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health ‘Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy and Childhood: Multi-Agency Guidelines for Care and Investigation’ Chair: Baroness Helena Kennedy QC.Google Scholar
Royal Statistical Society (2010) Practitioner Guide; ‘Fundamentals of Probability and Statistical Evidence in Criminal Proceedings – Guidance for Judges, Lawyers, Forensic Scientists and Expert Witnesses.’Google Scholar
Rummens, S., and Cuypers, S. ‘Determinism and the Paradox of Predictability’ (2010) Erkenn 72, 233–49.Google Scholar
Sample, I., ‘Mind-reading Program Translates Brain Activity into Words’ (2012) The Guardian Available at: www.theguardian.com/science/2012/jan/31/mind-reading-program-brain-words.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey ‘The Many Moral Realisms’ in Sayre-McCord, G. (ed.) Essays on Moral Realism (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan ‘On What Grounds What’ in Manley, D., Chalmers, D., and Wassermann, R. (eds.) Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 347–83.Google Scholar
Schaffner, Kenneth ‘Approaches to Reduction’ (1967) Philosophy of Science, 34, 137–47.Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R. Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick ‘Can Bad Science Be Good Evidence? Neuroscience, Lie Detection and Beyond’ (2010) Cornell Law Review 95, 1191–219.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick ‘Lie-Detection, Neuroscience, and the Law of Evidence’ in Patterson, Dennis and Pardo, Michael S. (eds.) Philosophical Foundations of Law and Neuroscience (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016),Google Scholar
Schoenmakers, S. et al. ‘Linear Reconstruction of Perceived Images from Human Brain Activity’ (2013) NeuroImage 83, 951–61.Google Scholar
Schwenklerk, John ‘Understanding “Practical Knowledge”’ (2015) Philosophers Imprint 15(15), 1–32.Google Scholar
Searle, J. ‘Minds, Brains, and Programs’ (1980a) Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 417–24.Google Scholar
Searle, J. ‘The Intentionality of Intention and Action’ (1980b) Cognitive Science 4, 47–70.Google Scholar
Searle, J. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), p. 263.Google Scholar
Searle, J. ‘The Chinese Room’ in Wilson, R. A. and Keil, F. (eds.) The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Setiya, K. ‘Intention’ in Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/intention/ last accessed on 14/05/2017.Google Scholar
Shaw, Elizabeth ‘Direct Brain Interventions and Responsibility Enhancement’ (2014) Criminal Law and Philosophy 8(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Shiffrin, Seana Valentine Speech Matters: On Lying, Morality, and the Law (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Sifferd, K. ‘In Defense of the Use of Commonsense Psychology in the Criminal Law’ (2006) Law and Philosophy 25, 571–612.Google Scholar
Sifferd, K. ‘Translating Scientific Evidence into the Language of the Folk: Executive Function as Capacity-Responsibility’ in Vincent, N. (ed.) Legal Responsibility and Neuroscience (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Sifferd, K. ‘What Does It Mean to Be a Mechanism? Stephen Morse, Non-Reductivism, and Mental Causation’ (2014) Criminal Law and Philosophy 11(1), 143–59.Google Scholar
Sifferd, K., Hirstein, W., and Fagan, T ‘Legal Insanity and Executive Function’ in The Insanity Defense: Multidisciplinary Views on Its History, Trends, and Controversies (Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2017), pp. 215–42.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter Moral Psychology: Free Will and Moral Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Sip, Kamila E. et al. ‘When Pinocchio’s Nose Does not Grow: Belief Regarding Lie-Detectability Modulates Production of Deception’ (2013) Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7(1).Google Scholar
Smith, A. ‘Attitudes, Tracing, and Control’ (2015) Journal of Applied Philosophy 32(2), 115–32.Google Scholar
Smith, P. A. ‘When DNA Implicates the Innocent’ (2016) Scientific American 314(6), 11–12.Google Scholar
Smith, S. ‘Overview of fMRI Analysis’ (2004) The British Journal of Radiology 77, S167–S175.Google Scholar
Sober, E. ‘The Multiple Realizability Argument against Reductionism’ (1999) Philosophy of Science 66(4), 542–64.Google Scholar
Soon, C. S., Brass, M., Heinze, H. J., and Haynes, J. D. ‘Unconscious Determinants of Free Decisions in the Human Brain’ (2008) Nature Neuroscience 11, 543–45.Google Scholar
Soon, C. S. et al. ‘Predicting Free Choices for Abstract Intentions’ (2013) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(15), 6217–22.Google Scholar
Sorensen, Roy ‘Bald-Faced Lies! Lying without the Intent to Deceive’ (2007) Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88, 251.Google Scholar
Stansbury, D. E., Naselaris, T., and Gallant, J. L. ‘Natural Scene Statistics Account for the Representation of Scene Categories in Human Visual Cortex’ (2013) Neuron 79(5), 1025–34.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. ‘Freedom and Resentment’ in Strawson, P. F. (ed.) Studies in the Philosophy of Thought and Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968), pp. 71–96.Google Scholar
Talbert, M. ‘Blame and Responsiveness to Moral Reasons: Are Psychopaths Blameworthy?’ (2008) Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89(4), 516–35.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles ‘Interpretation and the Sciences of Man’ (1971) The Review of Metaphysics 25(1), 3–51.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles Philosophical Papers: Volume 2, Philosophy and the Human Sciences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Teichman, Roger The Philosophy of Elizabeth Anscombe (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
ten Broeke, A. ‘U Bent Pedofiel, Zegt de Scanner’ (‘You Are a Paedophile, the Scanner Says)’ (2011) Trouw. Available at: www.trouw.nl/tr/nl/6700/Wetenschap/article/detail/3097538/2011/12/29/U-bent-pedofiel-zegt-de-scanner.dhtml.Google Scholar
ten Broeke, A. ‘De Scanner Zegt het. Dus het is Echt. Punt uit’ (The Scanner Says so. Hence it is Real. Period’) (2014) De Volkskrant. www.volkskrant.nl/opinie/de-scanner-zegt-het-dus-het-is-echt-punt-uit~a3765206/.Google Scholar
Tew, J., and Atkinson, R. ‘The Chromis Programme: From Conception to Evaluation’ (2013) Psychology, Crime & Law 19(5), 415–31.Google Scholar
Thabo Meli and Others vs R [1954] 1 WLR 228 (PC).Google Scholar
Thompson, E., and Varela, F. ‘Radical Embodiment: Neural Dynamics and Consciousness’ (2001) Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5, 418–25.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael ‘Anscombe’s Intention and Practical Knowledge’ in Ford, Anton, Hornsby, Jennifer, and Stoutland, Frederick (eds.) Essays on Anscombe’s Intention (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Uithol, S. et al. ‘What Do Mirror Neurons Mirror? (2011) Philosophical Psychology 24(5), 607–23.Google Scholar
Umbach, R., Berryessa, C., and Raine, A. ‘Brain Imaging Research on Psychopathy: Implications for Punishment, Prediction, and Treatment in Youth and Adults’ (2015) Journal of Criminal Justice 43(4), 295–306.Google Scholar
United States v. Dunnigan, 507 U.S. 87, 94 (1993).Google Scholar
United States v. Semrau, 693 F.3d 510 (6th Cir. 2012.Google Scholar
Van Gerven, M. et al. ‘The Brain-Computer Interface Cycle’ (2009) Journal of Neural Engineering 6(4), 41001.Google Scholar
Van Gulick, R. ‘Reduction, Emergence and Other Recent Options on the Mind/Body Problem: A Philosophic Overview’ (2001) Journal of Consciousness Studies 8(9–10), 1–34.Google Scholar
Van Overwalle, F., Baetens, K., Mariën, P., and Vandekerckhove, M. ‘Social Cognition and the Cerebellum: A Meta-Analysis of over 350 fMRI Studies’ (2014) NeuroImage 86, 554–72.Google Scholar
Vargas, M. Building Better Beings: A Theory of Moral Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Verschuere, B., Ben-Shakhar, G., and Meijer, E. Memory Detection: Theory and Application of the Concealed Information Test (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Vilares, I., Wesley, M., Ahn, W.-Y., et al. ‘Predicting the Knowledge-Recklessness Distinction in the Human Brain’ (2017) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(12), 3222–7.Google Scholar
Vincent, N. ‘Assessment and Modification of Free Will through Scientific Techniques: Two Challenges’ in Glannon, W (ed.) Free Will and the Brain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Vitiello, B., and Stoff, D. M. ‘Subtypes of Aggression and Their Relevance to Child Psychiatry (1997) Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 36(3), 307–15.Google Scholar
Von Hirsch, A. (2010) ‘Proportionality and Progressive Loss of Mitigation: Further Reflections’ in Roberts, J. and Von Hirsch, A. (eds.) Previous Convictions at Sentencing (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
von Riel, Raphael, and Van Gulick, Robert ‘Scientific Reduction’ (2014 version) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 52–54.Google Scholar
Ward, Tony ‘Expert Evidence and the Law Commission: Implementation without Legislation?’ (2013) Criminal Law Review 7, 561–76.Google Scholar
Watson, G. ‘Psychopathic Agency and Prudential Deficits’ (2013) Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113(3), 269–92.Google Scholar
Weisberg, D., Keil, F., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E., and Gray, J. ‘The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations’ (2008) Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20, 470–7.Google Scholar
Weisberg, D., Taylor, J., and Hopkins, E. ‘Deconstructing the Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations’ (2015) Decision Making 10, 429–44.Google Scholar
Wickens, C. ‘Multiple Resources and Mental Workload’ (2008) Human Factors 50(3), 449–55.Google Scholar
Williams, Meredith Wittgenstein, Mind and Meaning: Towards a Social Conception of Mind (London: Routledge, 1999).Google Scholar
Williamson, S., Hare, R. D., and Wong, S. ‘Violence: Criminal Psychopaths and Their Victims (1987) Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science 9(4), 455–62.Google Scholar
Wilson v. Corestaff Services L.P., 900 N.Y.S.2d 639 (May 14, 2010).Google Scholar
Wilson, Adam ‘The Law Commission’s Recommendation on Expert Evidence: Sufficient Reliability?’ (2012) 3 Web JCLIGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, H. and Permer, J. ‘Beliefs about Beliefs: Representation and Constraining Function of Wrong Beliefs in Young Children’s Understanding of Deception’ (1983) Cognition 13, 103–28.Google Scholar
Winograd, M. and Rosenfeld, J. P. ‘Mock Crime Application of the Complex Trial Protocol P300-based Concealed Information Test’ (2011) Psychophysiology 48(2), 155–61.Google Scholar
Winograd, M. and Rosenfeld, J. P. ‘Countermeasure Mechanisms in the Complex Trial Protocol’ (2012) International Journal of Psychophysiology 85(3): 305.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig Philosophical Investigations (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009).Google Scholar
Wolpe, P. R., ‘Is My Mind Mine?’ (2009) Forbes, Available at: www.forbes.com/2009/10/09/neuroimaging-neuroscience-mind-reading-opinions-contributors-paul-root-wolpe.html.Google Scholar
Yaffe, Gideon ‘Mind-Reading by Brain-Reading and Criminal Responsibility’ in Patterson, Dennis and Pardo, Michael S. (eds.) Philosophical Foundations of Law and Neuroscience (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Zamble, E., and Quinsey, V. The Criminal Recidivism Process (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Zlodre, J., Yiend, J., Burns, T., and Fazel, S. ‘Coercion, Competence, and Consent in Offenders with Personality Disorder’ (2016) Psychology, Crime & Law 22(4), 315.Google Scholar