“Anne Spurzem, Smith College alum writes controversial letter to the editor,” Huffington Post, February 27, 2012. Accessed at www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/24/smith-college-alum-writes-too-many-poor_n_1300279.html.Google Scholar

“It is Donald Trump’s Washington now – what’s next?” Denver Post, November 9, 2016. Accessed at www.denverpost.com/2016/11/09/how-donald-trump-won-and-why-the-media-missed-it/.Google Scholar

Abramowitz, Alan I. and Fiorina, Morris P.. “Polarized or sorted? Just what’s wrong with our politics anyway?” The American Interest, 2013. Accessed at www.the-american-interest.com/2013/03/11/polarized-or-sorted-just-whats-wrong-with-our-politics-anyway/.Google Scholar

Lincoln, Abraham. “Letter to Horace Greeley,” August 12, 1862. Accessed at www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/greeley.htm.Google Scholar

Agiesta, Jennifer, “Poll: political independents outweigh partisans,” Huffington Post, June 4, 2012. Accessed at www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20120604/us-independent-voters-poll/.Google Scholar

Ahn, Toh-Kyeong, Huckfeldt, Robert, Mayer, Alexander K., and Ryan, John Barry, “Expertise and bias in political communication networks,” American Journal of Political Science, 57(2) (2013), 357–373.Google Scholar

Alanna, , “Chris Royse’s controversial letter to the editor re. Christmas, abortion,” Moonhowlings: A Place for Civil Debate, December 8, 2008. Accessed at www.moonhowlings.net/index.php/2008/12/08/chris-royses-letter-to-the-editor/.Google Scholar

Althaus, Scott L., Cizmar, Anne M., and Gimpel, James G., “Media supply, audience demand, and the geography of news consumption in the United States,” Political Communication, 26 (2009), 249–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, rev. edn. (London: Verso, 1991).Google Scholar

Anderson, Ashley A., Brossard, Dominique, Scheufele, Dietram A., Xenos, Michael A., and Ladwig, Peter, “The ‘nasty effect’: online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3) (2014), 373–87.Google Scholar

Andre, Judith, “Open hope as a civic virtue: Ernst Bloch and Lord Buddha,” Social Philosophy Today, 29 (2013), 95, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, Molly, Lifetimes of Commitment: Aging, Politics, Psychology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen and Snyder, James M. Jr., “Rules, politics, and policy,” Election Law Journal, 1(3) (2004), 315–38.Google Scholar

Ardelt, Monika, “Wisdom as expert knowledge system: a critical review of a contemporary operationalization of an ancient concept,” Human Development, 47 (2004), 257–85.Google Scholar

Ashraf, Hina, “Letters to the editor: a resistant genre of unrepresented voices,” Discourse & Communication, 1 (2013), 1–19.Google Scholar

Atkins, Judi and Finlayson, Alan, “‘As Shakespeare so memorably said…’: quotation, rhetoric, and the performance of politics,” Political Studies 64(1) (2014), 164–81.Google Scholar

Atkinson, Lucy, “The public sphere in print: do letters to the editor serve as a forum for rationale-critical debate?” Paper submitted to the Cultural and Critical Studies Division, Association for Education in Journalism & Mass Communication, Washington, DC, 2007.Google Scholar

Austin, John L., How to Do Things with Words, 2nd edn. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Azari, Julia R., Delivering the People’s Message: The Changing Politics of the Presidential Mandate (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Barbazon, Tara, Unique Urbanity? Rethinking Third Tier Cities, Degeneration, Regeneration and Mobility (Singapore: Springer, 2015).Google Scholar

Barlow, Aaron, The Rise of the Blogosphere (Westport: Praeger, 2007), p. 37.Google Scholar

Barrette, Elizabeth, “Origami emotion,” in Loeb, Paul Rogat (ed.), The Impossible Will Take a Little While: Perseverance and Hope in Troubled Times (New York: Basic Books, 2014).Google Scholar

Baruch, Yehuda and Holtom, Brooks C., “Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research,” Human Relations, 61(8) (2008), 1139–60.Google Scholar

Baum, Matthew A., “Circling the wagons: soft news and isolationism in American public opinion,” International Studies Quarterly, 48(2) (2004), 313–38.Google Scholar

Bazerman, Charles, “Letters and the social grounding of differentiated genres,” in Barton, David and Hall, Nigel (eds.), Letter Writing as a Social Practice (Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1999), pp. 15–30.Google Scholar

Beasley, Vanessa, You, the People: American National Identity in Presidential Rhetoric (College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Bellah, Robert N., “Citizenship, diversity, and the search for the common good,” in Calvert, Robert E. (ed.), “The Constitution of the People”: Reflections on Citizens and Civil Society (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1991), p. 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellah, Robert N., Madsen, Richard, Sullivan, William M., Swidler, Ann, and Tipton, Steven M., Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Bellow, Saul, Herzog (Greenwich: Fawcett Crest, 1965).Google Scholar

Bennett, Stephen Earl, Apathy in America, 1960–1984: Causes and Consequences of Citizen Political Indifference (Dobbs Ferry: Transnational, 1986).Google Scholar

Bennett, W. Lance, “Changing citizenship in the digital age,” in Bennett, W. Lance (ed.), Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2008), p. 1–24.Google Scholar

Bennett, W. Lance, “The uncivic culture: communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politics,” PS: Political Science and Politics, 31 (1998), 740–61.Google Scholar

Berry, Wendell, Home Economics (San Francisco: North Point Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Bertsou, Eri, “Disentangling political distrust: what do citizens mean and think when expressing distrust towards political institutions and politicians?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 2014.Google Scholar

Black, Jeremy, Maps and Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Blais, André, To Vote or Not to Vote? The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Bligh, Michelle C., Kohles, Jeffrey C., and Meindl, James R., “Charting the language of leadership: a methodological investigation of President Bush and the crisis of 9/11,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3) (2004), 562–74.Google Scholar

Blom, Robin, Carpenter, Serena, Bowe, Brian J., and Lange, Ryan, “Frequent contributors in U.S. newspaper comment forums: an examination of their civility and informational value,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, London, June 2013.Google Scholar

Blumenthal, Paul, “Crowdpac helps small donors find a perfect match in politics,” Huffington Post, October 7, 2014, 2. Accessed at www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/07/crowdpac-donors_n_5943022.html.Google Scholar

Boczkowski, Pablo J. and Mitchelstein, Eugenia, The News Gap: When the Information Preferences of the Media and the Public Diverge (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Boczkowski, Pablo J. and Mitchelstein, Eeugenia, “The prosumption practices of monitorial citizens: accounting for the most commented stories on leading online news sites during and after the U.S. 2008 presidential election,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Boston, May 2011.Google Scholar

Bogart, Leo, “The public’s use and perception of newspapers,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 48 (1984), 709–719.Google Scholar

Bovens, Luc, “The value of hope,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 59 (1999), 667–681.Google Scholar

Brabazon, Tara, Unique Urbanity: Rethinking Third Tier Cities, Degeneration, Regeneration and Mobility (London: Springer, 2015).Google Scholar

Brady, Emily and Haapala, Arto, “Melancholy as an aesthetic emotion,” Contemporary Aesthetics, 1 (2003), 10. Accessed at http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.7523862.0001.006.Google Scholar

Brady, David W., Han, Hahrie, and Pope, Jeremy C., “Primary elections and candidate ideology: out of step with the primary electorate,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 32(1) (2007), 79–105.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, John, “Emancipation and hope,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 592 (2004), 179–198.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, Valerie, “The hope process and social inclusion,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 592 (2004), 128–151.Google Scholar

Bramlett, Brittany H., “Aged communities and political knowledge,” American Politics Research, 41 (2013), 674–98.Google Scholar

Brehm, John and Rahn, Wendy, “Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital,” American Journal of Political Science, 41 (1997), 999–1023.Google Scholar

Bridges, Thomas, The Culture of Citizenship: Inventing Postmodern Civic Culture (Albany: SUNY Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Broersma, Marcel and Graham, Todd, “Social media as beat: Tweets as a news source during the 2010 British and Dutch elections,” Journalism Practice, 6 (2012), 403–19.Google Scholar

Bromley, Michael, “‘Watching the watchdogs’? The role of readers’ letters in calling the press to account,” in Stephenson, Hugh and Bromley, Michael (eds.), Sex, Lies and Democracy: The Press and the Public (New York: Longman, 1998), pp. 147–62.Google Scholar

Brookhart, Jennifer L. and Tahk, Alexander Moss, “The origin of ideas,” Paper presented to the 72rd Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 2015.Google Scholar

Brooks, Arthur C., “We need optimists,” New York Times, July 25, 2015. Accessed at www.nytimes.com/2015/07/26/opinion/sunday/arthur-c-brooks-we-need-optimists.html?_r=0.Google Scholar

Brooks, David, “Are we on the path to national ruin?” New York Times, July 12, 2016, 17. Accessed at www.nytimes.com/2016/07/12/opinion/are-we-on-the-path-to-national-ruin.html?_r=0.Google Scholar

Brooks, David, “How to fix politics,” New York Times, April 12, 2016, 15–16.Google Scholar

Brown, Sarah, “A scholar of racial equity describes his ‘painful gratitude’ for Donald Trump,” Chronicle of Higher Education, January 20, 2017, A22.Google Scholar

Brundidge, Jennifer, “Encountering ‘difference’ in the contemporary public sphere: the contribution of the internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks,” Journal of Communication, 60 (2010), 680–700.Google Scholar

Bryan, Frank M., Real Democracy: The New England Town Meeting and How It Works (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Buell, Emmett H. “Eccentrics or gladiators? People who write about politics in letters-to-the-editor,” Social Science Quarterly, 56 (1975–6), 440–449.Google Scholar

Burgess, Jean, “Hearing ordinary voices: cultural studies, vernacular creativity and digital storytelling,” Continuum: Journal of Media & Culture Studies, 20 (2006), 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burke, Kenneth, A Rhetoric of Motives (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1950).Google Scholar

Burkeman, Oliver, “The power of negative thinking: both ancient philosophy and modern psychology suggest that darker thoughts can make us happier,” Wall Street Journal, December 7, 2012, 5, 8. Accessed at www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324705104578147333270637790.Google Scholar

Burn, Stephen (ed.), Conversations with David Foster Wallace (Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2012).Google Scholar

Butler, Daniel M. and Schofield, Emily, “Were newspapers more interested in pro-Obama letters to the editor in 2008? Evidence from a field experiment,” American Politics Research, 38 (2010), 356–71.Google Scholar

Byers, Dylan, “How politicians, pollsters and media missed Trump’s groundswell,” CNN Media, November 9, 2016. Accessed at http://money.cnn.com/2016/11/09/media/polling-media-missed-trump.Google Scholar

Cammaerts, Bart and Van Audenhove, Leo, “Online political debate, unbound citizenship, and the problematic nature of a transnational public sphere,” Political Communication, 22 (2005), 179–196.Google Scholar

Campbell, David, “Cold wars: securing identity, identifying danger,” in Dolan, Frederick M. and Dumm, Thomas L. (eds.), Rhetorical Republic: Governing Representations in American Politics (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1993), pp. 39–60.Google Scholar

Campbell, James, The American Campaign: U.S. Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote (College Station: Texas A&M Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Campbell, James E., “The miserable presidential election of 2012: a first party-term incumbent survives,” The Forum, 10(4) (2012), 20–28.Google Scholar

Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs and Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, Presidents Creating the Presidency: Deeds Done in Words (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Canovan, Margaret, The People (Cambridge: Polity, 2005).Google Scholar

Carey, Michael, “All sorts mingle at ‘Letter Writers Ball,’” The Masthead, June 22, 1997. Accessed at www.thefreelibrary.com/All+sorts+mingle+at+’Letter+Writers+Ball.’+%28meeting+of+writers+of…-a021059906.Google Scholar

Carlin, Diana B., Schill, Dan, Levasseur, David G., and King, Anthony S., “The post-9/11 public sphere: citizen talk about the 2004 presidential debates,” Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 8 (2005), 617–638.Google Scholar

Carlson, Matt and Ben-Porath, Eran, “‘The People’s Debate’: the CNN/YouTube debates and the demotic voice in political journalism,” Journalism Practice, 6 (2012), 302–316.Google Scholar

Carson, Jamie, Sievert, Joel, and Williamson, Ryan, “Assessing the rise and development of the incumbency advantage in Congress,” Paper presented at the Congress and History Conference held at Vanderbilt University, May 22–23, 2015.Google Scholar

Chabot, Dana, “In defense of ‘moderate’ relativism and ‘skeptical’ citizenship,” Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, 1993.Google Scholar

Chamberlain, Adam, “The (dis)connection between political culture and external efficacy,” American Politics Research, 41(5) (2013), 761–82.Google Scholar

Chouliaraki, Lilie, “Ordinary witnessing in post-television news: towards a new moral imagination,” Critical Discourse Studies, 7 (2010), 305–319.Google Scholar

Chouliaraki, Lillie, “Self-mediation: new media and citizenship,” Critical Discourse Studies, 7 (2010), 227–232.Google Scholar

Civettini, Andrew J. W., “Hope and voting: exploring the usefulness of hope scales in examining political participation,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, 2010.Google Scholar

Clark, April K., “Rethinking the decline in social capital,” American Politics Research, 43(4) (2015), 569–601.Google Scholar

Clarke, John, “Enrolling ordinary people: governmental strategies and the avoidance of politics?” Citizenship Studies, 14(6) (2010), 637–650.Google Scholar

Coe, Kevin, Kenski, Kate, and Rains, Stephen, “Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments,” Journal of Communication, 64(4) (2014), 658–79.Google Scholar

Coffey, Daniel J., Kohler, Michael, and Granger, Douglas M., “Sparking debate: campaigns, social media, and political incivility,” in Farrar-Myers, Victoria A. and Vaughn, Justin S. (eds.), Controlling the Message: New Media in American Political Campaigns (New York: New York University Press, 2015), 245–269.Google Scholar

Cohn, Bob, “21 charts that explain American values today,” The Atlantic, June 27, 2012. Accessed at www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/06/21-charts-that-explain-american-values-today/258990/.Google Scholar

Coleman, Stephen, “Beyond the po-faced public sphere,” in Coleman, Stephen, Moss, Giles, Parry, Katy, Halperin, John, and Ryan, Michael (eds.), Can the Media Serve Democracy? Essays in Honor of Jay G. Blumler (London: Palgrave, 2015), pp. 184–193.Google Scholar

Coleman, Stephen, How Voters Feel (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Cooper, Christopher A. and Knotts, H. Gibbs, “Voice of the people? Analyzing letters to the editor in North Carolina newspapers,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September 2005.Google Scholar

Cooper, Christopher, Knotts, H. Gibbs, and Haspel, Moshe, “The content of political participation: letters to the editor and the people who write them,” Political Science & Politics, 42(1) (2009), 131–7.Google Scholar

Corwin, Norman, “On a note of triumph,” CBS Radio, May 8, 1945. Reprinted in Studs Terkel, Hope Dies Last: Keeping the Faith in Difficult Times (New York: New Press, 2003), p. xxi.Google Scholar

Craig, Stephen C. and Maggiotto, Michael A., “Measuring political efficacy,” Political Methodology, 8 (1982), 85–109.Google Scholar

Cramer, Katherine, The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cranberg, Gilbert, “Genuine letters help democratize our debate: letters give a window into how regular folks see the events of the day,” The Masthead, September 22, 2004.Google Scholar

Crosby, Ned, Healthy Democracy: Bringing Trustworthy Information to the Voters of America Paperback (Edina: Beavers Pond Press, 2003).Google Scholar

da Silva, Marisa Torres, “Newsroom practices and letters-to-the-editor: an analysis of selection criteria,” Journalism Practice, 6 (2012), 250–263.Google Scholar

da Silva, Marisa Torres, “Professional views on letters-to-the-editor as a means of audience participation,” Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 10 (2013), 430.Google Scholar

Dagger, Richard, “Metropolis, memory and citizenship,” American Journal of Political Science, 25 (1981), 715–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dagger, Richard, “Metropolis, memory and citizenship,” American Political Science Review, 25 (1981), 725, 729.Google Scholar

Dahlgren, Peter, “The public sphere and the net: structure, space and communication,” in Bennett, E. Lance and Entman, Robert M. (eds.), Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 33–55.Google Scholar

Darr, Joshua P., “The news you use: political knowledge and the importance of local newspapers,” Paper presented to the 73rd annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 2015.Google Scholar

Data, Daily, “The most liberal and conservative cities in America,” December 15, 2015. Accessed at www.crowdpac.com/blog/the-most-liberal-and-conservative-cities-in-america.Google Scholar

Dauenhauer, Bernard P., “The place of hope in responsible political practice,” in Eliott, Jaklin A. (ed.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Hope (New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2005), 81–97.Google Scholar

Davidson, William B. and Cotter, Patrick R., “Psychological sense of community and newspaper readership,” Psychological Reports, 80 (1997), 659–65.Google Scholar

Davis, Richard, Politics Online: Blogs, Chatrooms, and Discussion Groups in American Democracy (New York: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar

Deckard, Natalie Delia and Browne, Irene, “Constructing citizenship: framing unauthorized immigrants in market terms,” Citizenship Studies, 19(6–7) (2015), 664–81.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, Jeroen and Raeymaeckers, Karin, “The printed rise of the common man: how Web 2.0 has changed the representation of ordinary people in newspapers,” Journalism Studies, 13(5–6) (2012), 825–35.Google Scholar

Diakopoulos, Nicholas and Naaman, Mor, “Towards quality discourse in online news comments,” in Hinds, Pamela, Tang, John C., and Wang, Jian (eds.), Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2011), pp. 133–42.Google Scholar

Dickinson, Greg, Suburban Dreams: Imaging and Building the Good Life (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Dickinson, Matthew, “No, America’s not divided: what everyone gets wrong about political polarization,” Politico Magazine, June 20, 2014. Accessed at www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/06/no-americas-not-divided-108119#ixzz4CRAjabNC.Google Scholar

Dillard, James Price and Backhaus, Steven J., “An exploration into emotion and civic deliberation,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, November, 1997.Google Scholar

Dinesen, Peter Thisted, Nørgaard, Aasbjørn Sonne, and Klemmensen, Robert, “The civic personality: personality and democratic citizenship,” Political Studies, 62(1) (2014), 134–152.Google Scholar

Dionne, Eugene Joseph Jr., “The good that could come from a Trump presidency,” Washington Post, December 28, 2016. Accessed at www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-good-that-could-come-from-a-trump-presidency/2016/12/28/63f5c82e-cd0e-11e6-a87f-b917067331bb_story.html?utm_term=.e08b97dff23e.Google Scholar

Domke, David, God Willing? Political Fundamentalism in the White House, the “War on Terror,” and the Echoing Press (London: Pluto Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Donnelly, Daria, “The power to die: Emily Dickinson’s letters of consolation,” in Earle, Rebecca (ed.), Epistolary Selves: Letters and Letter-Writers, 1600–1945 (Farnham: Ashgate, 1999), 134–151.Google Scholar

Drahos, Peter, “Trading in public hope,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 592(1) (2004), 18–38.Google Scholar

Druckman, James N. and Holmes, Justin W., “Does presidential rhetoric matter? Priming and presidential approval,” Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34(4) (2004) 755–78.Google Scholar

Dunkelman, Marc, The Vanishing Neighbor: The Transformation of American Community (New York: Norton, 2014).Google Scholar

Dupre, Michael and Mackey, David, “Letters and phone-mails to the editor: a comparison of reader input,” Newspaper Research Journal, 23 (2002), 142–7.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Émile, The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, Cladis, Mark S. (ed.); trans. Cosman, Carol (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Duscha, Julius, “Letters to the editor now come via many routes,” NewsInc, October 11, 1999. Accessed at www.thefreelibrary.com/letters+to+editors+now+come+via+many+routes+%3a+One+of+the+best+read…-a057101806.Google Scholar

Dzwonkowski, Ron, “It’s a cheap form of propaganda: now they are offering prizes to people who trick newspapers into publishing fake letters,” The Masthead, 56, September 22, 2004, 12. Accessed at www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-123078809.html.Google Scholar

Eagleton, Terry, Hope without Optimism (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Earle, Rebecca, “Introduction: letters, writers and the historian,” in Earle, Rebecca (ed.), Epistolary Selves: Letters and Letter-Writers, 1600–1945 (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1999), 1–14.Google Scholar

Edelstein, Alex S. and Larsen, Otto N., “The weekly press’ contribution to a sense of urban community,” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 37(4) (1960), 489–98.Google Scholar

Edwards, Lee, “Accommodating agency and reflexivity in Bourdieu’s analysis of language and discourse,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Boston, May 2011.Google Scholar

Ehrenfreund, Max, “These political scientists are discovering even more reasons U.S. politics are a disaster,” Washington Post, November 3, 2015, 12. Accessed at www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/11/03/these-political-scientists-are-discovering-even-more-reasons-u-s-politics-are-a-disaster/.Google Scholar

Emerson, Ralph Waldo, “Second centennial of Concord,” in Cabot, J. E. (ed.), Emerson’s Complete Works: Miscellanies (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1883).Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. and Wlezien, Christopher, The Timeline of Presidential Elections: How Campaigns Do (and Do Not) Matter (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Esser, Frank, “Dimensions of political news cultures: sound bite and image bite news in France, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States,” International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(4) (2008), 401–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eveland, William P. and Dylko, Ivan, “Reading political blogs during the 2004 election campaign: correlates and political consequences,” in Tremayne, Mark (ed.), Blogging Citizenship, and the Future of Media (New York: Routledge, 2007), pp. 114ff.Google Scholar

Farnsworth, Stephen J. and Lichter, S. Robert, The Nightly News Nightmare: Television’s Coverage of U.S. Presidential Elections, 1988–2004 (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2007).Google Scholar

Finkel, Steven E., “Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: a panel analysis,” American Journal of Political Science, 29 (1985), 891–913.Google Scholar

Firmstone, Julie and Coleman, Stephen, “Rethinking local communicative spaces: implications of digital media and citizen journalism for the role of local journalism in engaging citizens,” in Nielsen, Rasmus K. (ed.), Local Journalism: The Decline of Newspapers and the Rise of Digital Media (London: Tauris & Co., 2015), pp. 117–40.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James S., When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flatley, Johnathan, Affective Mapping: Melancholia and the Politics of Modernism (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, Robert Booth, The Dance with Community: The Contemporary Debate in American Political Thought (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Fox, Richard J., Crask, Melvin R., and Kim, Jonghoon, “Mail survey response rate: a meta-analysis of selected techniques for inducing response,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 52(4) (1988), 467–91.Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund, “Mourning and melancholia,” in Strachey, James (trans.), Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 14 (London: Hogarth Press, 2016), p. 243–258.Google Scholar

Frisinger, Jim and Traud, Luanne, “An e-mail conversation: how to deal with letter-planters; let’s try the town square rule for determining legitimate letters,” The Masthead (56), September 22, 2004. Accessed at www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-123078816.html.Google Scholar

Fryrear, Andrea, “Survey response rates,” Survey Gizmo, July 27, 2015. Accessed at www.surveygizmo.com/survey-blog/survey-response-rates/.Google Scholar

Fulwider, John, “Newspaper requires letter writers to be registered voters,” AP Online, May 19, 1998. Accessed at www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-19723286.html.Google Scholar

Funk, Marcus, “Imagined commodities? Analyzing local identity and place in American community newspaper website banners,” New Media & Society, 5 (2012), 574–595.Google Scholar

Gainous, Jason and Wagner, Kevin M., “Surfing to the extremes: the polarization of public opinion,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 2015.Google Scholar

Gans, Herbert, Middle American Individualism: The Future of Liberal Democracy (New York: Free Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Garfield, Simon, To the Letter: A Celebration of the Lost Art of Letter Writing (New York: Gotham, 2013).Google Scholar

Gastil, John and Xenos, Michael, “Of attitudes and engagement: clarifying the reciprocal relationship between civic attitudes and political participation,” Journal of Communication, 60 (2010), 318–43.Google Scholar

Gershtenson, Joseph and Plane, Dennis L., “In government we distrust: citizen skepticism and democracy in the United States,” The Forum, 13(3) (2015), 481–505.Google Scholar

Gervais, Bryan T., “Incivility online: affective and behavioral reactions to uncivil political posts in a Web-based experiment,” Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2) (2015), 167–85.Google Scholar

Ghadessy, Mohsen, “Information structure in letters to the editor,” International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 21 (1983), 46–56.Google Scholar

Gibson, Ginger and Kahn, Chris, “America’s angry voters divvied by Trump and Sanders: poll,” Reuters, January 30, 2016. Accessed at www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-anger-idUSMTZSAPEC1USEXIB3.Google Scholar

Glaeser, Edward, Triumph of the City: How our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier, and Happier (New York: Penguin, 2011), p. 64.Google Scholar

Glendon, Mary Ann, Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse (New York: The Free Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Goldman, Loren, “What is political hope? Kantian reflections on practical philosophy,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 2008, p. 8.Google Scholar

Goss, Brian Michael, “Online ‘looney tunes’: an analysis of reader-composed comment threads in The Nation,” Journalism Studies, 8 (2007), 365–81.Google Scholar

Goyanes, Manuel, “The value of proximity: examining the willingness to pay for online local news,” International Journal of Communication, 9 (2015), 1507, 1505–1522.Google Scholar

Graham, Todd and Wright, Scott, “Discursive equality and everyday talk online: the impact of ‘superparticipants,’” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3) (2014), 625–42.Google Scholar

Gray, Sean W. D., “Mapping silent citizenship: how democratic theory hears citizens’ silence and why it matters,” Citizenship Studies, 19(5) (2015), 474–91.Google Scholar

Grey, David L. and Brown, Trevor R., “Letters to the editor: hazy reflections of public opinion,” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 47 (1970), 450–471.Google Scholar

Groeling, Tim and Kernell, Samuel, “Is network news coverage of the president biased?” The Journal of Politics, 60(4) (1998) 1063–87.Google Scholar

Gross, Kimberly, Brewer, Paul R., and Aday, Sean, “Confidence in government and emotional responses to terrorism after September 11, 2001,” American Politics Research, 37 (2009), 107–28.Google Scholar

Grossman, Matt and Hopkins, David A., “Ideological Republicans and group interest Democrats: the asymmetry of American party politics,” Perspectives on Politics, 13(1) (2015), 119–39.Google Scholar

Gutman, Amy and Thompson, Dennis, Democracy and Disagreement: Why Moral Conflict Cannot Be Avoided in Politics, and What Should Be Done About It (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, “Citizenship and national identity,” in Van Steenbergen, Bart (ed.), The Condition of Citizenship (London: Sage, 1994), 20–35.Google Scholar

Hagner, Paul, Maule, Linda, and Parry, Janine Alisa, “Political culture and information supply and consumption,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 1996.Google Scholar

Haidt, Jonathan, “The positive emotion of elevation,” Prevention & Treatment, 3 (2000), 1–5.Google Scholar

Harlow, Summer, “Story-chatterers stirring up hate: racist discourse in reader comments on U.S. newspaper websites,” Howard Journal of Communications, 26 (2015), 21–42.Google Scholar

Hart, Roderick P., “The rhetoric of the true believer,” Communication Monographs, 38(4) (1971), 249–61.Google Scholar

Hart, Roderick P., Seducing America: How Television Charms the Modern Voter (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Hart, Roderick P., Childers, Jay P., and Lind, Colene J., Political Tone: How Leaders Talk and Why (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013), pp. 59–88.Google Scholar

Hart, Roderick P. and Curry, Alexander L., “The third voice of American politics,” Presidential Studies Quarterly, 46(1) (2016), 73–97.Google Scholar

Hart, Roderick P. and Daughton, Suzanne M., Modern Rhetorical Criticism, 3rd edn. (Boston: Pearson, 2005).Google Scholar

Hart, Stephen, Cultural Dilemmas of Progressive Politics: Styles of Engagement among Grassroots Activists (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Hauser, Gerard A., Vernacular Voices: The Rhetoric of Publics and Public Spheres (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Hawken, Paul, “You are brilliant and the earth is hiring,” in Loeb, Paul (ed.), The Impossible Will Take a Little While: Perseverance and Hope in Troubled Times (New York: Basic Books, 2014), 54–59.Google Scholar

Hayes, Andrew F., Scheufele, Dietram A., and Huge, Michael E., “Nonparticipation as self-censorship: publicly observable political activity in a polarized opinion climate,” Political Behavior, 28 (2006), 259–283.Google Scholar

Hayes, Danny and Lawless, Jennifer L., “As local news goes, so goes citizen engagement: media, knowledge, and participation in U.S. house elections,” The Journal of Politics, 77(2) (2015), 447–62.Google Scholar

Heinonen, Ari, “The journalist’s relationship with users: new dimensions to conventional roles,” in Singer, Jane B. et al. (eds.), Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011), pp. 34–55.Google Scholar

Herbst, Susan, Reading Public Opinion: How Political Actors View the Democratic Process (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Hermida, Alfred, “Fluid spaces, fluid journalism: the role of the “active recipient” in participatory journalism,” in Singer, Jane et al. (eds.), Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011), pp. 177–91.Google Scholar

Hermida, Alfred and Thurman, Neil, “A clash of cultures: the integration of user-generated content within professional journalistic frameworks at British newspaper websites,” Journalism Practice, 2 (2008), 343–56.Google Scholar

Herring, Susan C., Scheidt, Lois A., Kouper, Inna, and Wright, Elijah, “Longitudinal content analysis of blogs: 2003–2004,” in Tremayne, Mark (ed.), Blogging, Citizenship, and the Future of Media (New York: Taylor and Francis, 2007), pp. 3–20.Google Scholar

Hibbing, John R. and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, “Americans’ desire for stealth democracy: how declining trust boosts political participation,” Paper presented at the annual convention of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 2001.Google Scholar

Hibbing, John R. and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, “How trustworthy politicians decrease mass political participation,” Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, September 2001.Google Scholar

Hibbing, John R. and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes toward American Political Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Hill, David B., “Letter opinion on ERA: a test of the newspaper bias hypothesis,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 45(3) (1981), 384–92.Google Scholar

Hoffer, Eric, The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements (New York: Harper and Row, 1951).Google Scholar

Hoffman, Lindsay H. and Eveland, William P. Jr., “Assessing causality in the relationship between community attachment and local news media use,” Mass Communication and Society, 13 (2010), 174–195.Google Scholar

Hogan, Jackie, “Letters to the editor in the ‘War on Terror’: a cross-national study,” Mass Communication & Society, 9 (2006), 63–83.Google Scholar

Hollander, Barry A., “Tuning out or tuning elsewhere? Partisanship, polarization, and media migration from 1998 to 2006,” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 85(1) (2008), 23–40.Google Scholar

Honoré, Carl, In Praise of Slow: How a Worldwide Movement is Challenging the Cult of Speed (London: Orion, 2004).Google Scholar

Hooghe, Marc and Oser, Jennifer, “Partisan identity, civic associations and the development of trust in the United States: an analysis of the General Social Survey, 1972–2012,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 2014.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Dan J., “The increasingly United States,” Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, August 2014.Google Scholar

Horwitz, Steven, “Markets are the voice of the people: modern populists have it all backwards,” Foundation for Economic Education, May 12, 2016. Accessed at https://fee.org/articles/markets-are-the-voice-of-the-people/.Google Scholar

Huckfeld, Robert and Sprague, John, Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign (New York: Cambridge, 1995).Google Scholar

Hudson, Wayne, “Bloch and a philosophy of the proterior,” in Thompson, Peter and Žižek, Slavoj (eds.), The Privatization of Hope: Ernst Bloch and the Future of Utopia (Durham: Duke University Press, 2013), pp. 21–36.Google Scholar

Hughey, Matthew W. and Daniels, Jessie, “Racist comments at online news sites: a methodological dilemma for discourse analysis,” Media, Culture & Society, 35 (2013), 332–47.Google Scholar

Ingraham, Chris, “Talking (about) the elite and mass: vernacular rhetoric and discursive status,” Philosophy and Rhetoric, 46 (2013), 6, 14.Google Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto, Peters, Mark D., and Kinder, Donald R., “Experimental demonstrations of the ‘not-so-minimal’ consequences of television news programs,” American Political Science Review, 76(4) (1982), 848–58.Google Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto, Norpoth, Helmut, and Hahn, Kyu S., “Consumer demand for election news: the horserace sells,” Journal of Politics, 66(1) (2004), 157–75.Google Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto and Westwood, Sean J., “Fear and loathing across party lines: new evidence on group polarization,” American Journal of Political Science, 59(3) (2015), 690–707.Google Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto, Konitzer, Tobias, and Tedin, Kent, “The home as a political fortress: family agreement in an era of polarization,” Working paper, Department of Communication, Stanford University, May 2016.Google Scholar

Janowitz, Morris, The Community Press in an Urban Setting (Glencoe: Free Press, 1952).Google Scholar

Jarvis, Sharon E. and Han, Soo-Hye, “The mobilized voter: portrayals of electoral participation in print coverage of campaign 2008,” American Behavioral Scientist, 55(4) (2011), 419–436.Google Scholar

Jarvis, Sharon E. and Han, Soo-Hye, “From an honored value to a harmful choice: how presidential candidates have discussed electoral participation (1948–2012),” American Behavioral Scientist, 57(12) (2013), 1650–1662.Google Scholar

Jeffres, Leo W., Dobos, Jean, and Sweeney, Mary, “Communication and commitment to community,” Communication Research, 14(6) (1987), 619–643.Google Scholar

Jeffres, Leo W., Atkin, David, and Neuendorf, Kimberly A., “A model linking community activity and communication with political attitudes and involvement in neighborhoods,” Political Communication, 19 (2002), 387–421.Google Scholar

Jennings, M. Kent and Markus, Gregory B., “Political involvement in the later years: a longitudinal survey,” American Journal of Political Science, 32 (1988), 320–316.Google Scholar

Johnson, Timothy and Owens, Linda, “Survey response rate reporting in the professional literature,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Nashville, May 2003. Accessed at www.srl.uic.edu/publist/Conference/rr_reporting.pdf.Google Scholar

Jones, Starner, Jackson Clarion-Ledger, June 29, 2009. Accessed at http://clarionledger.newspapers.com/.Google Scholar

Kaase, Max, Newton, Kenneth, and Scarbrough, Elinor, “A look at the beliefs in government study,” Political Science & Politics, 29 (1996), 226.Google Scholar

Kahn, Kim Fridkin and Kenney, Patrick J., The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Kam, Cindy D., “When duty calls, do citizens answer?” The Journal of Politics, 69 (1) (2007), 17–29.Google Scholar

Kapoor, Suraj and Botan, Carl, “Editors’ perceptions of the letters to the editor column,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, May 1989.Google Scholar

Kapoor, Suraj, “Most papers receive more letters,” The Masthead, 47, Summer 1995, 18–21.Google Scholar

Karpowitz, Christopher F., “Extremists or good citizens? The political psychology of public meetings and the dark side of civic engagement,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Associate, Chicago, April 2006.Google Scholar

Karpowitz, Christopher F., “Men, women, and Wal-Mart: Citizen Discourse at Local Public Hearings,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September 2007.Google Scholar

Karpowitz, Christopher F., “A theory of local public talk and deliberative reform,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September 2005.Google Scholar

Karpowitz, Christopher F. and Mendelberg, Tali, The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Krontiris, Kate, Webb, John, Krontiris, Charlotte, and Chapman, Chris, “Understanding America’s ‘interested bystander’: a complicated relationship with civic duty,” June 3, 2015. Politics and Election Blog. Accessed at http://googlepolitics.blogspot.com/2015/06/understanding-americas-interested.html.Google Scholar

Kaye, Barbara K., “Blog use motivations: an exploratory study,” in Tremayne, Mark (ed.), Blogging Citizenship, and the Future of Media (New York: Routledge, 2007), pp. 127–48.Google Scholar

Kelley, Mark, “For democracy and the bottom line: goals United States newspapers hold for their letters to the editor section,” Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication convention, San Francisco, August 2006.Google Scholar

Keren, Michael, “Blogging and the politics of melancholy,” Canadian Journal of Communication, 29 (2004), 5–23.Google Scholar

Kernell, Samuel, Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership, 4th edn. (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Key, V. O., The Responsible Electorate (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966).Google Scholar

Kidd, Quentin, “The real (lack of) difference between Republicans and Democrats: a computer word score analysis of party platforms, 1996–2004,” PS: Political Science & Politics, 41(3) (July 2008), 519–25.Google Scholar

Kim, Joohan, Wyatt, Robert O., and Katz, Elihu, “News, talk, opinion, participation: the part played by conversation in deliberative democracy,” Political Communication, 16 (1999), 361–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Daniel B., “The people’s romance: why people love government (as much as they do),” The Independent Review, 10 (2005), 5–37.Google Scholar

Klofstad, Casey, Civic Talk: Peers, Politics, and the Future of Democracy (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Knack, Stephen and Kropf, Martha E., “For shame! The effect of community cooperative context on the probability of voting,” Political Psychology, 19 (1998), 585–99.Google Scholar

Knack, Stephen, “Social capital and the quality of government: evidence from the States,” American Journal of Political Science, 46(4) (2002), 772–85.Google Scholar

Kornberg, Alan and Clarke, Harold D., Citizens and Community: Political Support in a Representative Democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Krämer, Benjamin, “Media populism: a conceptual clarification and some theses on its effects,” Communication Theory, 24 (2014), 42–60.Google Scholar

Krize, Nikki, “Controversial letter to the editor calls for execution of president,” WNEP – The News Station, May 28, 2015. Accessed at http://wnep.com/2015/05/28/letter-to-the-editor-reads-controversy/.Google Scholar

Krontitis, Kate, Webb, John, and Chapman, Chris, “Understanding America’s ‘interested bystander’: a complicated relationship with civic duty,” (2015). Accessed at http://googlepolitics.blogspot.com/2015/06/understanding-americas-interested.html.Google Scholar

Kurpius, David D. and Mendelson, Andrew, “A case study of deliberative democracy on television: civic dialogue on C-SPAN call-in shows,” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 79 (2002), 587–601.Google Scholar

Ladd, Jonathan McDonald, “The role of media distrust in partisan voting,” Political Behavior, 32 (2010), 567–85.Google Scholar

Lampe, Cliff, Zube, Paul, Lee, Jusil, Chul Hyun Park, and Erik Johnston, “Crowdsourcing civility: a natural experiment examining the effects of distributed moderation in online forums,” Government Information Quarterly, 31(2) (2014), 317–326.Google Scholar

Landert, Daniela and Jucker, Andreas H., “Private and public in mass media communication: from letters to the editor to online commentaries,” Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (2011), 1422–34.Google Scholar

Lane, Robert E., “The joyless polity: contributions of democratic process to ill-being,” in Elkin, Stephen L. and Soltan, Karol Edward (eds.), Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999), p. 329–370.Google Scholar

Lash, Scott, “Being after time: towards a politics of melancholy,” Cultural Values, 2 (1998), 316–18.Google Scholar

Lawrence, Eric, Sides, John, and Farrell, Henry, “Self-segregation or deliberation? Blog readership, participation, and polarization in American politics,” Perspectives on Politics, 8 (2010), 141–57.Google Scholar

Lee, Taeku, Mobilizing Public Opinion: Black Insurgency and Racial Attitudes in the Civil Rights Era (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Lemert, James B. and Larkin, Jerome P., “Some reasons why mobilizing information fails to be in letters to the editor,” Journalism Quarterly, 56 (1979), 504–12.Google Scholar

Lepenies, Wolf, Melancholy and Society, Gaines, Jeremy and Jones, Doris (trans.) (Cambridge: Howard University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Leuprecht, Christian and Skillicorn, David, “Incumbency effects in U.S. presidential campaigns: language patterns matter,” Electoral Studies, May 2016. Accessed at www.researchgate.net/publication/303917215_Incumbency_effects_in_US_presidential_campaigns_Language_patterns_matter.Google Scholar

Levi, Margaret and Stoker, Laura, “Political trust and trustworthiness,” Annual Review of Political Science, 3 (2000), 475–507.Google Scholar

Levin, Murray Burton, The Alienated Voter: Politics in Boston (New York: Holt, 1960).Google Scholar

Levitt, Steven D. and Wolfram, Catherine D., “Decomposing the sources of incumbency advantage in the U.S. House,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 22(1) (1997), 45–60.Google Scholar

Lewis, Justin, Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin, and Inthorn, Sanna, “Images of citizenship on television news: constructing a passive public,” Journalism Studies, 5(2) (2004), 153–164.Google Scholar

Lindquist, Julie, A Place to Stand: Politics and Persuasion in a Working-Class Bar (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Loeb, Paul Rogat, “Hope, voting and creating the world you want to live in: getting to the polls is just the first step,” The Nation, September 10, 2014, 7. Accessed at www.thenation.com/article/hope-voting-and-creating-world-you-want-live/.Google Scholar

Loke, Jaime, “Old turf, new neighbors: journalists’ perspectives on their new shared space,” Journalism Practice, 6 (2012), 233–49.Google Scholar

Lovell, George I., “This Is Not Civil Rights”: Discovering Rights Talk in 1939 America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Lowden, Nancy B., Andersen, Peter A., Dozier, David M., and Lauzen, Martha M., “Media use in the primary election: a secondary medium model,” Communication Research, 21(3) (1994), 293–304.Google Scholar

Luks, Samantha, “Stability of citizenship values over time and the life cycle,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, San Francisco, April 1996.Google Scholar

Luttbeg, Norman R. and Gant, Michael M., American Electoral Behavior: 1952–1992 (New York: Peacock, 1994).Google Scholar

Magnet, Anne and Carnet, Didier, “Letters to the editor: still vigorous after all these years? A presentation of the discursive and linguistic features of the genre,” English for Specific Purposes, 25 (2006), 173–99.Google Scholar

Mansick, Mike, “Do people still write letters to the editor?” Tech Dirt, August 22, 2008. Accessed at www.techdirt.com/articles/20080822/0140562057.shtml#comments.Google Scholar

Marcus, George E. and MacKuen, Michael B., “Anxiety, enthusiasm, and the vote: the emotional underpinnings of learning and involvement during presidential campaigns,” American Political Science Review, 87 (1993), 672–685.Google Scholar

Marcus, George E., The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Marien, Sofie, Hooghe, Marc, and Oser, Jennifer, “Great expectations: the effect of democratic ideals and evaluations on political trust: a comparative investigation of the 2012 European Social Survey,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 2015.Google Scholar

Markus, Gregory B., “Causes and consequences of civic engagement in America: initial report of the civic engagement project,” Paper presented at the annual convention of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 2001.Google Scholar

Masnick, Mike, “Too much free time: do people still write letters to the editor?” TechDirt, August 22, 2008, 7:38 p.m. Accessed at www.techdirt.com/articles/20080822/0140562057.shtml.Google Scholar

Mataconis, Doug, “38% of congressmen represent ‘safe’ districts,” Outside the Beltway, October 7, 2013, 7. Accessed at www.outsidethebeltway.com/38-of-congressmen-represent-safe-districts/.Google Scholar

Matthews, David, Politics for People: Finding a Responsible Public Voice (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Maybin, Janet, “Death row penfriends: some effects of letter writing on identity and relationships,” in Barton, David and Hall, Nigel (eds.), Letter Writing as a Social Practice (Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1999), 151–177.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R., “Incumbency advantage in U.S. presidential elections: the historical record,” Political Science Quarterly, 123(2) (2008), 201–28.Google Scholar

McCluskey, Michael and Hmielowski, Jay, “Opinion expression during social conflict: comparing online reader comments and letters to the editor,” Journalism, 13(3) (2011), 303–19.Google Scholar

McCormick, Samuel, “Neighbors and citizens: local speakers in the now of their recognizability,” Philosophy & Rhetoric, 44 (2011), 424–45.Google Scholar

McDaniel, James P. and Gronbeck, Bruce E., “Through the looking glass and back: democratic theory, rhetoric, and Barbiegate,” in Tracy, Karen, McDaniel, James P., and Gronbeck, Bruce E. (eds.), The Prettier Doll: Rhetoric, Discourse, and Ordinary Democracy (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2007), 22–44.Google Scholar

McElroy, Kathleen, “Where old (gatekeepers) meets new (media): herding reader comments into print,” Journalism Practice, 7(6) (2013), 755–71.Google Scholar

McGeer, Victoria, “The art of good hope,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 592 (2004), 100–127.Google Scholar

McGillis, Alec, “Who turned my blue state red: why poor areas vote for politicians who want to slash the safety net,” New York Times, November 20, 2015. Accessed at www.nytimes.com/2015/11/22/opinion/sunday/who-turned-my-blue-state-red.html?_r=0.Google Scholar

McLeod, Jack M., Scheufele, Dietram A., and Moy, Patricia, “Community, communication, and participation: the role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation,” Political Communication, 16 (1999), 315–36.Google Scholar

Medvic, Stephen K., “Explaining support for stealth democracy,” Paper presented at the annual convention of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 2016.Google Scholar

Mémet, Monique, “Letters to the editor: a multi-faceted genre,” European Journal of English Studies, 9 (2005), 75–90.Google Scholar

Mencken, Henry Louis, “The cult of hope,” in Prejudices: Second Series (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1920).Google Scholar

Mencken, Henry Louis, Prejudices: Second Series (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1920), pp. 211–18.Google Scholar

Miller, Toby, The Well-Tempered Self: Citizenship, Culture and the Postmodern Subject (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Miller, Susan, Assuming the Positions: Cultural Pedagogy and the Politics of Commonplace Writing (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Miller, Carolyn R. and Shepherd, Dawn, “Blogging as social action: a genre analysis of the weblog,” in Laura Gurak, Smiljana Jevic, Laurie Johnson, Clancy Ratliff, and Jessica Reyman (eds.), Into the Blogosphere, October 20, 2010. Accessed at www.researchgate.net/publication/274510648_Blogging_as_Social_Action_A_Genre_Analysis_of_the_Weblog.Google Scholar

Miller, Michael K., Wang, Guanchun, Kulkarni, Sanjeev R., Poor, H. Vincent, and Osherson, Daniel N., “Citizen forecasts of the 2008 U.S. presidential election,” Politics & Policy, 40 (2012), 1019–52.Google Scholar

Miller, Patrick R. and Conover, Pamela J., “Winning is everything: the psychology of partisan competition,” Paper presented at the annual convention of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 2014.Google Scholar

Milne, Esther, Letters, Postcards, Email Technologies of Presence (New York: Routledge, 2010).Google Scholar

Mitchell, Amy, Gottfried, Jeffrey, Kiley, Jocelyn, and Matsa, Katerina Eva, “Political polarization and media habits,” Pew Research Center, October 21, 2014. Accessed at www.journalism.org/2014/10/21/political-polarization-media-habits/.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Amy, Holcomb, Jesse, and Page, Dana, “Local news in a digital age,” Pew Research Center, March 2015. Accessed at www.journalism.org/2015/03/05/local-news-in-a-digital-age/.Google Scholar

Mitchelstein, Eugenia, “Catharsis and community: divergent motivations for audience participation in online newspapers and blogs,” International Journal of Communication, 5 (2011), 2014–2034.Google Scholar

Moellendorf, Darrel, “Hope as a political virtue,” Philosophical Papers, 35 (2006), 413–433.Google Scholar

Morrell, Michael E., “Survey and experimental evidence for a reliable and valid measure of internal political efficacy,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 67 (2003), 589–602.Google Scholar

Moy, Patricia M., McCluskey, Michael, McCoy, Kelley, and Spratt, Margaret, “Political correlates of local news media use,” Journal of Communication, 54 (2004), 532–46.Google Scholar

Mulgan, Geoff, Politics in an Antipolitical Age (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Mullinix, Kevin J., “Civic duty and political preference formation,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 2016.Google Scholar

Mutz, Diana C., “Effects of ‘in-your-face’ television discourse on perceptions of a legitimate opposition,” American Political Science Review, 101(4) (2007), 621–35.Google Scholar

Nadeau, Richard, Blais, Andre, Nevitte, Neil, and Gidengil, Elisabeth, “Elections and Satisfaction with Democracy,” Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Political Science Association, September 2000.Google Scholar

Nader, Ralph and Gold, Steven, “Letters to the editor: how about a little down-home glasnost?” Columbia Journalism Review, 27 (1988), 53–4.Google Scholar

Nakajo, Miwa, “The role of civic engagement in local political trust,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 2015.Google Scholar

Neblo, Michael A., Esterling, Kevin M. Kennedy, Ryan P., Lazer, David M. J., and Sokhey, Anand E., “Who wants to deliberate – and why?” Working paper, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government, 2009.Google Scholar

Neveu, Catherine, “Of ordinariness and citizenship processes,” Citizenship Studies, 19(2)(2015), 141–54.Google Scholar

Nevitte, Neil and White, Stephen, “Citizen expectations and democratic performance: the sources and consequences of democratic deficits from the bottom up,” in Lenard, Patti Tamara and Simeon, Richard (eds.), Imperfect Democracies: The Democratic Deficit in Canada and the United States (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2012), p. 52.Google Scholar

Newhagen, John E., “Media use and political efficacy: the suburbanization of race and class,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Washington, DC, 1993.Google Scholar

Newport, Frank, Saad, Lydia, and Traugott, Michael, “Informed Americans rate both parties in Congress worse,” Gallup, October 5, 2015. Accessed at www.gallup.com/poll/186011/informed-americans-rate-parties-congress-worse.aspx.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Carolyn E., “Coproduction or cohabitation: are anonymous online comments on newspaper websites shaping news content?” New Media & Society, 16 (2014), 470–87.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Rasmus K., “Introduction: the uncertain future of local journalism,” in Nielsen, Rasmus K. (ed.), Local Journalism: The Decline of Newspapers and the Rise of Digital Media (London: Tauris & Co., 2015), pp. 1–30.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Rasmus K., “Participation through letters to the editor: circulation, considerations, and genres in the letters institution,” Journalism, 11 (2010), 21–35.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Rasmus L., “Local newspapers as keystone media: the increased importance of diminished newspapers for local political information environments,” in Nielsen, R. K. (ed.), Local Journalism: The Decline of Newspapers and the Rise of Digital Media (London: Tauris & Co., 2015), pp. 51–72.Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich, Human, All Too Human: A Book for Free Spirits, Faber, Marion and Lehmann, Stephan (trans.) (Lincoln, NB: Bison Books, 1996), section 70.Google Scholar

Niven, David, “The other side of optimism: high expectations and the rejection of status quo politics,” Political Behavior, 22(1) (2000), 1–88.Google Scholar

Norrander, Barbara, “Ideological representativeness of presidential primary voters,” American Journal of Political Science, 33(3) (1989), 570–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norris, Andrew, “Becoming who we are: democracy and the political problem of hope,” Critical Horizons: A Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory, 9 (2008), 77–89.Google Scholar

Nusselder, André, “Twitter and the personalization of politics,” Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 18 (2013), 91–100.Google Scholar

Nutter, Michael, “Speech at the Democratic National Convention,” Charlotte, NC, September 7, 2012. Accessed at www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTE8tvzuXUQ.Google Scholar

Oldenburg, Ray, The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community (New York: Da Capo Press, 1999), p. 77.Google Scholar

Oliver, Eric, “The influence of social context on patterns of political mobilization,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August 1996.Google Scholar

Oliver, Eric, Local Elections and the Politics of Small-Scale Democracy (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Oliver, J. Eric, “The effects of metropolitan economic segregation on local civic participation,” American Journal of Political Science, 43 (1999), 186–212.Google Scholar

Orly, Aidan, “Elite doesn’t mean more intelligent,” The Student Life, April 26, 2013. Accessed at http://tsl.news/opinions/3156/.Google Scholar

Page, Susan and Breitman, Kendall, “Divided we still stand – and getting used to it: long on dissatisfaction, divided about solutions,” USA Today, March 23, 2014. Accessed at www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2014/03/23/congress-divided-poll/6792585/.Google Scholar

Paskin, Danny, “Say what? An analysis of reader comments in bestselling American newspapers,” The Journal of International Communication, 16 (2010), 67–83.Google Scholar

Pasternak, Steve, “Editors and the risk of libel in letters,” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 60 (1983), 311–328.Google Scholar

Pasternak, Steve and Kapoor, Suraj, “The letters boom,” The Masthead, Fall 1980, 23–25.Google Scholar

Patterson, Thomas E., “Political roles of the journalist,” in Graber, Doris A., McQuail, Denis, and Norris, Pippa (eds.), The Politics of News, The News of Politics, 2nd edn. (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2007), pp. 23–39.Google Scholar

Pattison, Neal, “The din of online comments to fall silent,” HeraldNet, December 20, 2015. Accessed at www.heraldnet.com/article/20151220/NEWS01/151229934.Google Scholar

Peake, Jeffrey S., “Presidents and front-page news: how America’s newspapers cover the Bush administration,” The International Journal of Press/Politics, 12(4) (2007), 52–70.Google Scholar

Perkins, Thomas, “Progressive Kristallnacht coming?” Wall Street Journal, January 24, 2014. Accessed at www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304549504579316913982034286.Google Scholar

Perlmutter, David D., Blogwars (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Perrin, Andrew J. and Vaisey, Stephen, “Parallel public spheres: distance and discourse in letters to the editor,” American Journal of Sociology, 114 (2008), 781–810.Google Scholar

Perrin, Andrew J., American Democracy: From Tocqueville to Town Halls to Twitter (London: Polity Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Perrin, Andrew J., “‘Since this is the editorial section I intend to express my opinion’: inequality and expressivity in letters to the editor,” The Communication Review, 19(1) (2016), 20.Google Scholar

Perrin, Andrew J., “Since this is the editorial section I intend to express my opinion,” The Communication Review, 19(1) (2016), 55–76.Google Scholar

Peters, Jeremy W., “Gloomy Republican campaigns leave behind Reagan cheer,” New York Times, September 12, 2015. Accessed at www.nytimes.com/2015/09/13/us/politics/gloomy-republican-campaigns-leave-behind-reagan-cheer.html.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip, “Hope and its place in mind,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 592 (2004), 152–165.Google Scholar

Pew Research Center, “Political polarization in the American public: how increasing ideological uniformity and partisan antipathy affect politics, compromise and everyday life,” June 12, 2014. Accessed at www.people-press.org/2014/06/12/political-polarization-in-the-american-public/.Google Scholar

Pinkleton, Bruce E. and Austin, Erica Weintraub, “Individual motivations, perceived media importance, and political disaffection,” Political Communication, 18 (2001), 321–334.Google Scholar

Pitts, Leonard Jr., “Trump, Cruz ideas are just plain stupid,” Miami Herald, March 25, 2016. Accessed at: www.miamiherald.com/opinion/opn-columns-blogs/leonard-pitts-jr/article68350122.html#storylink=cpy.Google Scholar

Pollock, III, Philip, H., “The participatory consequences of internal and external political efficacy: a research note,” Western Political Quarterly, 36(3) (1983), 400–9.Google Scholar

Pounds, Gabrina, “Democratic participation and letters to the editor in Britain and Italy,” Discourse and Society, 17(1) (2006), 29–63.Google Scholar

Pranger, Robert J., The Eclipse of Citizenship: Power and Participation in Contemporary Politics (New York: Holt, 1968).Google Scholar

Pritchard, David and Berkowitz, Dan, “How readers’ letters may influence editors and news emphasis: a content analysis of 10 newspapers, 1948–1978,” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 68 (1991), 388–95.Google Scholar

Prothro, James W. and Grigg, Charles M., “Fundamental principles of democracy: bases of agreement and disagreement,” Journal of Politics, 22 (1960), 276–294.Google Scholar

Puglia, Chris, “Do online comments bring newspapers value?” St. Albert Gazette, January 9, 2016. Accessed at www.stalbertgazette.com/article/Do-online-comments-bring-newspapers-value-20160109.Google Scholar

Putnam, Robert D., Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2001).Google Scholar

Radmacher, Dan, “A look at the perpetrators: the list of interest groups encouraging ‘astroturf’ is as long as the list of interest groups,” The Masthead, 56, September 22, 2004. Accessed at www.thefreelibrary.com/A+look+at+the+perpetrators%3A+the+list+of+interest+groups+encouraging…-a0123078810.Google Scholar

Raeymaeckers, Karin, “Letters to the editor: a feedback opportunity turned into a marketing tool: an account of selection and editing practices in the Flemish daily press,” European Journal of Communication, 20 (2005), 199–221.Google Scholar

Rahn, Wendy M., “The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates,” American Journal of Political Science, 37(2) (1993), 472–96.Google Scholar

Rahn, Wendy and Rudolph, Thomas J., “A tale of political trust in American cities,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(4) (2005), 530–60.Google Scholar

Rahn, Wendy M., Kwang Suk Yoon, Michael Garet, Steven Lipson, and Katherine Loflin, “Geographies of trust,” American Behavioral Scientist, 52(12) (2009), 1646–1663.Google Scholar

Reader, Bill, “A case for printing ‘name withheld’ letters,” The Masthead, June 22, 2002. Accessed at www.thefreelibrary.com/A+case+for+printing+’name+withheld’+letters.-a089648658.Google Scholar

Reader, Bill, “An ethical ‘blind spot’: problems of anonymous letters to the editor,” Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 20 (2005), 62–76.Google Scholar

Reader, Bill, “New research on the nature of letters and their writers,” The Masthead, June 22, 2005, 17.Google Scholar

Reader, Bill, “Who’s really writing those ‘canned’ letters to the editor?” Newspaper Research Journal, 26 (2005), 43–56.Google Scholar

Reader, Bill and Moist, Kevin, “Letters as indicators of community values: two case studies of alternative magazines,” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 85 (2008), 823–840.Google Scholar

Reader, Bill and Riffe, Dan, “Survey supports publication of controversial letters,” Newspaper Research Journal, 27 (2006), 74–90.Google Scholar

Reader, Bill, Stempel, Guido H., and Daniel, Douglass K., “Age, wealth, education predict letters to the editor,” Newspaper Research Journal, 25 (2004), 55–66.Google Scholar

Reagle, Joseph M., Reading the Comments: Likers, Haters and Manipulators at the Bottom of the Web (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Reich, Zvi, “User comments: the transformation of participatory space,” in Singer, Jane et al. (eds.), Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011).Google Scholar

Renfro, Paula Cozort, “Bias in selection of letters to editor,” Journalism Quarterly, 56 (1979), 822–6.Google Scholar

Rheingold, Howard, Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution (New York: Basic Books, 2004).Google Scholar

Rhine, Staci, Bennett, Stephen E., and Flickinger, Richard, “Patterns of media exposure in the U.S. and their impact on knowledge of foreign affairs,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 1996.Google Scholar

Rhodes, Jesse H. and Albert, Zachary, “The transformation of partisan rhetoric in presidential campaigns, 1952–2012: partisan polarization and the rise of bipartisan posturing among Democratic candidates,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 2015.Google Scholar

Rice, Tom W. and Sumberg, Alexander F., “Civic culture and government performance in the American States,” Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 27(1) (1997), 99–114.Google Scholar

Richardson, John E., “‘Now is the time to put an end to all this’: argumentative discourse theory and ‘letters to the editor,’” Discourse & Society, 12 (2001), 143–168.Google Scholar

Richardson, John E. and Franklin, Bob, “‘Dear editor’: race, reader’s letters and the local press,” The Political Quarterly, 74 (2003), 184–92.Google Scholar

Richardson, John E. and Franklin, Bob, “Letters of intent: election campaigning and orchestrated public debate in local newspapers’ letters to the editor,” Political Communication, 21 (2004), 459–78.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul, “The political paradox,” in Jung, Hwa Yol (ed.), Existential Phenomenology and Political Theory: A Reader (Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1972), 414–427.Google Scholar

Ripley, John, “Colleagues criticize Coffman for writing letter to editor,” BDN Archive: Penobscot/Bangor Daily News, October 3, 1991. Accessed at http://archive.bangordailynews.com/1991/10/03/colleagues-criticize-coffman-for-writing-letter-to-editor/.Google Scholar

Robinson, Sue and Deshano, Cathy, “Citizen journalists and their third places: what makes people exchange information online (or not)?” Journalism Studies, 12 (2011), 642–57.Google Scholar

Rodden, Jonathan, “This map will change how you think about American voters – especially small-town, heartland white voters,” Monkey Cage: The Washington Post, October 31, 2016. Accessed at http://atlas.esri.com/Atlas/VoterAtlas.html?t=1&m=1&x=-94.69&y=38.62&l=5.Google Scholar

Roper Social and Political Trends Data, 1973–1994. The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, Ithaca, NY. Accessed at http://ropercenter.cornell.edu/CFIDE/cf/action/catalog/abstract.cfm?Ext=1&Archno=USRoper1994-Trends.Google Scholar

Rorty, Richard, Contingency, Irony and Solidarity (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Rosenberry, Jack, “Users support online anonymity despite increasing negativity,” Newspaper Research Journal, 32(2) (2011), 6–19.Google Scholar

Rosenberry, Jack, “Virtual community support for offline communities through online newspaper message forums,” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87 (2010), 154–69.Google Scholar

Rosenblum, Nancy L., “Navigating pluralism: the democracy of everyday life (and where it is learned),” in Elkin, Stephen L. and Soltan, Karol Edward (eds.), Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999), 67–88.Google Scholar

Rosenstone, Steven and Hansen, John Mark, Mobilization, Participation and Democracy in America (New York: Macmillan, 1993).Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Irving, “Who writes the ‘letters to the editor’?” Saturday Review, September 13, 1969, 116.Google Scholar

Rothenbuhler, Eric W., Mullen, Lawrence J., DeLaurell, Richard, and Ryu, Choon Ryul, “Communication, community attachment, and involvement,” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73 (1996), 445–66.Google Scholar

Ruiz, Carlos, Domingo, David, Micó, Josep Lluís, Díaz-Noci, Javier, Meso, Koldo, and Masip, Pere, “Public sphere 2.0? The democratic qualities of citizen debates in online newspapers,” The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16 (2011), 463–87.Google Scholar

Sampson, Robert J., “Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: a multilevel systemic model,” American Sociology Review, 53 (1988), 766–79.Google Scholar

Sandel, Michael J., “America’s search for a new public philosophy,” The Atlantic Monthly, March (1996), 57–74.Google Scholar

Santana, Arthur D., “Online readers’ comments represent new opinion pipeline,” Newspaper Research Journal, 32 (2011), 66–81.Google Scholar

Santana, Arthur D., “Controlling the conversation: the availability of commenting forums in online newspapers,” Journalism Studies, 17(2) (2016), 141–158.Google Scholar

Scheufele, Dietram A. and Nisbet, Matthew C., “Being a citizen online: new opportunities and dead ends,” International Journal of Press/Politics, 7 (2002), 55–75.Google Scholar

Scheufele, Dietram A., Shanahan, James, and Kim, Sei-Hill, “Who cares about local politics? Media influences on local political involvement, issue awareness, and attitude strength,” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 79 (2002), 427–444.Google Scholar

Schreiber, Darren, Fonzo, Greg, Simmons, Alan N., Dawes, Christopher T., Flagan, Taru, Fowler, James H., and Paulus, Martin P., “Red brain, blue brain: evaluative processes differ in Democrats and Republicans,” PLoS ONE, 8(2) (February 13, 2013). Accessed at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052970.Google Scholar

Schroedel, Jean, Bligh, Michelle, Merolla, Jennifer, and Gonzalez, Randall, “Charismatic rhetoric in the 2008 presidential campaign: commonalities and differences,” Presidential Studies Quarterly, 43(1) (2013), 101–28.Google Scholar

Schudson, Michael, The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life (New York: Free Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Schultz, Lucille M., “Letter-writing instruction in 19th century schools in the United States,” in Barton, David and Hall, Nigel (eds.), Letter Writing as a Social Practice (Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1999), 109–130.Google Scholar

Seigel, Kalman, Talking Back to the New York Times: Letters to the Editor, 1851–1971 (New York: Quadrangle, 1972).Google Scholar

Sennett, Richard, The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1998).Google Scholar

Shade, Patrick, Habits of Hope: A Pragmatic Theory (Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Shaker, Lee, “Citizens’ local political knowledge and the role of media access,” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86 (2009), 809–26.Google Scholar

Sharot, Tali, “Optimism bias: why the young and the old tend to look on the bright side,” The Washington Post, December 31, 2012. Accessed at www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/optimism-bias-why-the-young-and-the-old-tend-to-look-on-the-bright-side/2012/12/28/ac4147de-37f8-11e2-a263-f0ebffed2f15_story.html.Google Scholar

Sharot, Tali, The Optimism Bias: A Tour of the Irrationally Positive Brain (New York: Pantheon Books, 2011).Google Scholar

Shklar, Judith N., American Citizenship: The Quest for Inclusion (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Siebel, Catherine, “Gender on the page: letters to the editor and the tobacco debate,” Feminist Media Studies, 8 (2008), 408–423.Google Scholar

Siegel, Beth and Waxman, Andy, Third-Tier Cities: Adjusting to the New Economy (Washington, DC: US Economic Development Administration, 2001). Accessed at www.mtauburnassociates.com/pubs/Third_Tier_Cities.pdf.Google Scholar

Sigelman, Lee and Walkosz, Barbara J., “Letters to the editor as a public opinion thermometer: the Martin Luther King holiday vote in Arizona,” Social Science Quarterly, 73 (1992), 938–46.Google Scholar

Singletary, Michael, “How public perceives letters to the editor,” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 53 (1976), 535–7.Google Scholar

Singletary, Michael W. and Cowling, Marianne, “Letters to the editor of the non-daily press,” Journalism Quarterly, 56 (1979), 165–8.Google Scholar

Skey, Michael, “The mediation of nationhood: communicating the world as a world of nations,” Communication Theory, 24 (2014), 1–20.Google Scholar

Skogerbø, Eli and Krumsvik, Arne H., “Newspapers, Facebook and Twitter: intermedial agenda setting in local election campaigns,” Journalism Practice, 9(3) (2015), 350–66.Google Scholar

Sleat, Matt, “Hope and disappointment in politics,” Contemporary Politics, 19 (2013), 131–45.Google Scholar

Smith, Aaron, Scholzman, Kay Lehman, Verba, Sidney, and Brady, Henry, “The current state of civic engagement in America,” Pew Research Center, September 1, 2009. Accessed at www.pewinternet.org/2009/09/01/the-current-state-of-civic-engagement-in-america.Google Scholar

Smith, Amy Erica, “Do Americans still believe in democracy? State of the 2016 race,” Monkey Cage/Washington Post, April 9, 2016. Accessed at www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/04/09/do-americans-still-believe-in-democracy.Google Scholar

Snyder, Charles Richard, “Hope theory: rainbows in the mind,” Psychological Inquiry, 13 (2002), 249–275.Google Scholar

Soltan, Karol Edward, “Civic competence, attractiveness, and maturity,” in Elkin, Stephen L. and Soltan, Karol Edward (eds.), Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999), p. 17–38.Google Scholar

Soroka, Stuart and McAdams, Stephen, “News, politics, and negativity,” Political Communication, 32(1) (2015), 1–22.Google Scholar

Sotillo, Susana M. and Starace-Nastasi, Dana, “Political discourse of a working-class town,” Discourse and Society, 10 (1999), 411–38.Google Scholar

Splichal, Slavko, Principles of Publicity and Press Freedom (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002).Google Scholar

Stamm, Keith R., Newspaper Use and Community Ties: Toward a Dynamic Theory (Norwood: Ablex, 1986).Google Scholar

Steinbeck, John, Travels with Charley in Search of America (New York: Penguin, 1961).Google Scholar

Stonecash, Jeffrey M. and Brewer, Mark D., Dynamics of American Political Parties (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Stotsky, Sandra, “Writing in a political context: the value of letters to legislators,” Written Communication, 4 (1987), 394–410.Google Scholar

Stromer-Galley, Jennifer, “New voices in the public sphere: a comparative analysis of interpersonal and online political talk,” Javnost – The Public, 9(2) (2002), 23–42.Google Scholar

Stropnicky, Gerard, “Foreword,” in Stropnicky, Gerard, Byrn, Tom, Goode, James, and Matheny, Jerry (eds.), Letters to the Editor: Two Hundred Years in the Life of an American Town (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1998), p. iii.Google Scholar

Tarrant, William D., “Who writes letters to the editor?” Journalism Quarterly, 34 (1957), 501–2.Google Scholar

Taylor, Paul, The Next America: Boomers, Millennials, and the Looming Generational Showdown (New York: Public Affairs, 2014).Google Scholar

Tewksbury, David, “Exposure to the newer media in a presidential primary campaign,” Political Communication, 23(3) (2006), 313–32.Google Scholar

Thelen, David, Becoming Citizens in the Age of Television: How Americans Challenged the Media and Seized Political Initiative During the Iran-Contra Debate (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Thompson, Peter, “Religion, utopia and the metaphysics of contingency,” in Thompson, Peter and Žižek, Slavoj (eds.), The Privatization of Hope: Ernst Bloch and the Future of Utopia (Durham: Duke University Press, 2013), pp. 82–105.Google Scholar

Thornton, Brian, “Heroic editors in short supply during Japanese internment,” Newspaper Research Journal, 23 (2002), 99–113.Google Scholar

Thornton, Brian, “Rejecting the eloquence of hate: 1972 magazine letters to the editor,” Journal of Magazine & New Media Research, 12 (2011), 1–25.Google Scholar

Thornton, Brian, “Subterranean days of rage: how magazine letters to the editor in 1952 foretold a generation of revolution,” American Journalism, 24 (2007), 59–88.Google Scholar

Thornton, Brian, “Telling it like it is: letters to the editor discuss journalism ethics in 10 American magazines, 1962–1972–1982–1992,” Journal of Magazine and New Media Research, 1 (1999), 1–15.Google Scholar

Times Mirror Survey, The Vocal Minority in American Politics (Washington, DC: Times Mirror Center, 1993).Google Scholar

Townsend, Rebecca M., “Town meeting as a communication event: democracy’s act sequence,” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42 (2009), 68–89.Google Scholar

Trachtenberg, Zev M., Making Citizens: Rousseau’s Political Theory of Culture (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar

Tracy, Karen, Challenges of Ordinary Democracy: A Case Study in Deliberation and Dissent (University Park: Penn State University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Troy, Gil, See How They Run (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Turner, Bryan S., “Outline of the theory of human rights,” in Turner, Bryan S. (ed.), Citizenship and Social Theory (London: Sage, 1993), p. 162–190.Google Scholar

Turner, Bryan S., “Silent citizens: reflections on community, habit, and the silent majority in political life,” Citizenship Studies, 19(5) (2015), 507–519.Google Scholar

Turner, Graeme, Ordinary People and the Media: The Demotic Turn (Los Angeles: Sage, 2010).Google Scholar

Twenge, Jean M., Campbell, W. Keith, and Carter, Nathan T., “Decline in trust in others and confidence in institutions among American adults and late adolescents, 1972–2012,” Psychological Science, 25(10) (2014), 1914–23.Google Scholar

Ulbig, Stacy Gwenn and Perry, Steven, “I virtually hate them: the differential impact of online and offline news sources on partisan sentiment,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 2014.Google Scholar

Vacin, Gary L., “A study of letter-writers,” Journalism Quarterly, 42 (1965), 464–5, 510.Google Scholar

Vargo, Chris J. and Hopp, Toby, “Socioeconomic status, social capital, and partisan polarity as predictors of political incivility on Twitter: a congressional district-level analysis,” Social Science Computer Review, 33 (2015), 1–23.Google Scholar

Vasquez, Francisco and Eveslage, Thomas, “Newspapers’ letters to the editor as reflections of social structure,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Corvallis, Oregon, August 1983.Google Scholar

Vedlitz, Arnold and Veblen, Eric P., “Voting and contacting: two forms of political participation in a suburban community,” Urban Affairs Quarterly, 16(1) (1980), 31–48.Google Scholar

Veenstra, Aaron S., “Reconceptualizing political blogs as part of elite political media,” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Denver, August 2010.Google Scholar

Verba, Sidney, Brody, Richard A., Parker, Edwin B., Nie, Norman H., Polsby, Nelson W., Ekman, Paul, and Black, Gordon S., “Public opinion and the war in Vietnam,” American Political Science Review, 61 (1967), 317–33.Google Scholar

Verba, Sidney and Nie, Norman H., Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality (New York: Harper, 1972).Google Scholar

Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E., Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Verba, Sidney, “Culture, calculation, and being a pretty good citizen: alternative interpretations of civil engagement,” Eckstein Lecture, University of California, Irvine (January 2001).Google Scholar

Volgy, Thomas J., Krigbaum, Margaret, Langan, Mary Kay, and Moshier, Vicky, “Some of my best friends are letter writers: eccentrics and gladiators revisited,” Social Science Quarterly, 58 (1977), 321–7.Google Scholar

Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin, “Coping with the meaninglessness of politics: citizenspeak in the 2001 British general elections,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Seoul, South Korea, July 2002.Google Scholar

Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin, “Letters to the editor,” Peace Review, 11 (1999), 56.Google Scholar

Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin, “Letters to the editor as a forum for public deliberation: modes of publicity and democratic debate,” Critical Studies in Media Communication, 18 (2001), 303–320.Google Scholar

Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin, “Letters to the editor in local and regional newspapers: giving voice to the readers,” in Franklin, Bob (ed.), Local Journalism and Local Media: Making the Local News (London: Routledge, 2006), p. 231–241.Google Scholar

Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin, Journalists and the Public: Newsroom Culture, Letters to the Editor, and Democracy (Cresskill: Hampton Press, 2007), pp. 54, 91, 137, 159.Google Scholar

Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin, “Understanding the conditions for public discourse: four rules for selecting letters to the editor,” Journalism Studies, 3 (2002), 69–81.Google Scholar

Walsh, Katherine Cramer, Talking about Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Walsh, Katherine Cramer, “Putting inequality in its place: rural consciousness and the power of perspective,” American Political Science Review, 106 (2012), 517–32.Google Scholar

Walsh, Katherine Cramer and Lassen, David S., “Rural vs. urban coverage in newspapers across an upper Midwestern state,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 2012.Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael, “Civility and civic virtue in contemporary America,” Social Research, 41 (1974), 593–611.Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael, “Citizenship,” in Ball, Terence, Farr, James, and Hanson, Russell L. (eds.), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989), p. 216.Google Scholar

Warner, Michael, The Letters of the Republic: Publications and the Public Sphere in Eighteenth-Century America (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Weaver, Jerry L., “The elderly as a political community: the case of national health policy,” Western Political Quarterly, 29 (1976), 610–619.Google Scholar

Weber, Patrick, “Discussions in the comments section: factors influencing participation and interactivity in online newspapers’ reader comments,” New Media & Society, 16(6) (2014), 941–957.Google Scholar

Weeks, Brian E., Ksiazek, Thomas B., and Holbert, R. Lance, “Partisan enclaves or common media experiences? A network approach to understanding citizens’ political news environment,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, London, June 2013.Google Scholar

Weinschenk, Aaron C., “Personality traits and the sense of civic duty,” American Politics Research, 42 (2014), 90–113.Google Scholar

Weisberg, Herbert F., “Partisanship and incumbency in presidential elections,” Political Behavior, 24(4) (2002), 339–61.Google Scholar

West, Cornel, “The moral obligations of living in a democratic society,” in Bartstone, David and Mendieta, Eduardo (eds.), The Good Citizen (New York: Routledge, 1999), p. 5–12.Google Scholar

Whitford, Andrew B. and Yates, Jeff, Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda: Constructing the War on Drugs (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Whyman, Susan, “‘Paper visits’: the post-restoration letter as seen through the Verney family archive,” in Earle, Rebecca (ed.), Epistolary Selves: Letters and Letter-Writers, 1600–1945 (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1999), p. 15–36.Google Scholar

Wildavsky, Aaron, “Resolved, that individualism and egalitarianism be made compatible in America: political-cultural roots of exceptionalism,” in Shafer, Byron E. (ed.), Is America Different? A New Look at American Exceptionalism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991), p. 117–137.Google Scholar

Wilson, James Q., The Moral Sense (New York: Free Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Wolf, Josh, “Moderation matters for online commenting,” Journalism that Matters, December 13, 2013. Accessed at http://journalismthatmatters.net/blog/2013/12/13/moderation-matters-for-online-commenting/.Google Scholar

Wright, Scott and Graham, Todd, “Discursive equality and everyday talk online: the impact of ‘superparticipants’,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19 (3) (2013), 1–18.Google Scholar

Xenos, Michael, Vromen, Ariadne, and Loader, Brian D., “The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies,” Information, Communication & Society, 17(2) (2014), 151–67.Google Scholar

You, Kyung H., Lee, Mi Sun, and Oh, Sohyun, “Why use online comments? Examining the relationship among online comments, civic attitudes, and participation intention,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Boston, May 2011.Google Scholar

Zamith, Rodrigo and Lewis, Seth C., “From public spaces to public sphere: rethinking discursive spaces on news websites,” Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Communication Association, London, June 2013.Google Scholar

Ziegele, Marc, Breiner, Timo, and Quiring, Oliver, “What creates interactivity in online news discussions? An exploratory analysis of discussion factors in user comments on news items,” Journal of Communication, 64 (2014), 1111–38.Google Scholar

Zinn, Howard, A People’s History of the United States (New York: HarperCollins, 1999).Google Scholar

Žižek, Slavoj, “Preface: Bloch’s ontology of not-yet-being,” in Thompson, Peter and Žižek, Slavoj (eds.), The Privatization of Hope: Ernst Bloch and the Future of Utopia (Durham: Duke University Press, 2013), 1–20.Google Scholar

Zuckerman, Ezra W. and Jost, John T., “What makes you think you’re so popular? Self-evaluation maintenance and the subjective side of the ‘friendship paradox,’” Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(3) (2001), 207–23.Google Scholar

Zullow, Harold M., “American exceptionalism and the quadrennial peak in optimism,” in Miller, Arthur H. and Gronbeck, Bruce E. (eds.), Presidential Campaigns and American Self-Images (Boulder: Westview, 1994), 214–230.Google Scholar

Zullow, Harold M., Oettingen, Gabriele, Peterson, Christopher, and Seligman, Martin E., “Pessimistic explanatory style in the historical record: CAVing LBJ, presidential candidates, and east versus west Berlin,” American Psychologist, 43(9) (1988), 673–82.Google Scholar