Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T08:12:42.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part V - Leading Community Engagement Efforts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2018

Edited by
Joseph A. Allen  and
Roni Reiter-Palmon
Joseph A. Allen
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Omaha
Roni Reiter-Palmon
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Omaha
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Organizational Community Engagement and Outreach , pp. 259 - 314
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Ackerman, P. L. (1992). Predicting individual differences in complex skill acquisition: Dynamics of ability determinants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 598–614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M., & Herrmann, A. (2005). The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs. Journal of Marketing, 69, 19–34.Google Scholar
Aslin, H. & Brown, V. (2004). Towards whole of community engagement: A practical toolkit. Canberra: Murray-Darling Basin Commission.Google Scholar
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational development. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 4, 231–272.Google Scholar
Bowen, F., Newenham-Kahindi, A., & Herremans, I. (2010). When suits meet roots: The antecedents and consequences of community engagement strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, D. W., Campbell, R. J., & Grant, D. L. (1974). Formative years in business: A long-term AT&T study of managerial lives. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Byrne, C. L., Shipman, A. S., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). The effects of forecasting on creative problem-solving: An experimental study. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 119–138.Google Scholar
Cartwright, S., & Holmes, N. (2006). The meaning of work: The challenge of regaining employee engagement and reducing cynicism. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 199–208.Google Scholar
Caughron, J. J., Antes, A. L., Stenmark, C. K. et al. (2011). Sensemaking strategies for ethical decision making. Ethics & Behavior, 21, 351–366.Google Scholar
Centers, R., Shomer, R. W., & Rodrigues, A. (1970). A field experiment in interpersonal persuasion using authoritative influence. Journal of Personality, 38, 392–403.Google Scholar
Connelly, M. S., Gilbert, J. A., Zaccaro, S. J. et al. (2000). Exploring the relationship of leadership skills and knowledge to leader performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 65–86.Google Scholar
Day, D. V., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. (2004). Leadership capacity in teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 857–880.Google Scholar
Driscoll, A. (2008). Carnegie’s community-engagement classification: Intentions and insights. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 40, 38–41.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2009). Development of professional expertise: Toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 484–503.Google Scholar
Fleishman, E. A., & Harris, E. F. (1962). Patterns of leadership behavior related to employee grievances and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 15, 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogg, B. J. (2008). Mass interpersonal persuasion: An early view of a new phenomenon. In Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., & Øhrstrøm, P. (Eds.), Persuasive technology (pp. 23–34). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, T. L., Vessey, W. B., Schuelke, M. J., Ruark, G. A., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). A framework for understanding collective leadership: The selective utilization of leader and team expertise within networks. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 933–958.Google Scholar
Gabler, N. (2006) Walt Disney: The triumph of the American imagination. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Goldvarg, E., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2001). Naive causality: A mental model theory of causal meaning and reasoning. Cognitive Science, 25, 565–610.Google Scholar
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. D. (2005). The long civil rights movement and the political uses of the past. The Journal of American History, 91, 1233–1263.Google Scholar
Hammond, K. J. (1990). Case‐based planning: A framework for planning from experience. Cognitive Science, 14, 385–443.Google Scholar
Head, B. W. (2007). Community engagement: Participation on whose terms? Australian Journal of Political Science, 42, 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hester, K. S., Robledo, I. C., Barrett, J. D. et al. (2012). Causal analysis to enhance creative problem-solving: Performance and effects on mental models. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 115–133.Google Scholar
Hodson, R. (2014). Workers’ earnings and corporate economic structure. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hopyan, T., Dennis, M., Weksberg, R., & Cytrynbaum, C. (2001). Music skills and the expressive interpretation of music in children with Williams–Beuren syndrome: Pitch, rhythm, melodic imagery, phrasing, and musical affect. Child Neuropsychology, 7, 42–53.Google Scholar
Howell, J. M., & Boies, K. (2004). Champions of technological innovation: The influence of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation, and idea promotion on champion emergence. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 123–143.Google Scholar
Hu, J., & Liden, R. C. (2011). Antecedents of team potency and team effectiveness: An examination of goal and process clarity and servant leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 851–862.Google Scholar
Kanigel, R. (2016). Eyes on the street: The life of Jane Jacobs. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Lasch, C. (1991). The true and only heaven: Progress and its critics. New York: Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Lee, D., Kim, H. S., & Kim, J. K. (2011). The impact of online brand community type on consumer’s community engagement behaviors: Consumer-created vs. marketer-created online brand community in online social-networking web sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 59–63.Google Scholar
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 407–416.Google Scholar
Lord, R. G., De Vader, C. L., & Alliger, G. M. (1986). A meta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership perceptions: An application of validity generalization procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 402–410.Google Scholar
Marcy, R. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Social innovation: Enhancing creative performance through causal analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 123–140.Google Scholar
Marcy, R. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Leader cognition: Improving leader performance through causal analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 1–19.Google Scholar
Marta, S., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Leadership skills and the group performance: Situational demands, behavioral requirements, and planning. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 97–120.Google Scholar
Martin, L. E., Stenmark, C. K., Thiel, C. E. et al. (2011). The influence of temporal orientation and affective frame on use of ethical decision-making strategies. Ethics & Behavior, 21, 127–146.Google Scholar
McKenna, B., Rooney, D., & Boal, K. B. (2009). Wisdom principles as a meta-theoretical basis for evaluating leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 177–190.Google Scholar
Medeiros, K. E., Partlow, P. J., & Mumford, M. D. (2014). Not too much, not too little: The influence of constraints on creative problem solving. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 198–210.Google Scholar
Medeiros, K. E., Steele, L. M., Watts, L. L., & Mumford, M. D. (2017). Timing is everything: Examining the role of constraints throughout the creative process. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1037/aca0000148.Google Scholar
Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1986). Organizations: New concepts for new forms. California Management Review, 28, 62–73.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D. (2002) Social innovation: Ten cases from Benjamin Franklin. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 253–266.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Antes, A. L., Caughron, J. J., Connelly, S., & Beeler, C. (2010). Cross-field differences in creative problem-solving skills: A comparison of health, biological, and social sciences. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 14–26.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Maher, M. A., Costanza, D. P., & Supinski, E. P. (1997). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: IV. Category combination. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Supinski, E. P., & Maher, M. A. (1996). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: II. Information encoding. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 77–88.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Hester, K. S., Robledo, I. C. et al. (2012). Mental models and creative problem-solving: The relationship of objective and subjective model attributes. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 311–330.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Marks, M. A., Connelly, M. S., Zaccaro, S. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2000). Development of leadership skills: Experience and timing. The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Mecca, J. T., & Watts, L. L. (2015). Planning processes: Relevant cognitive operations. In Mumford, M. D. & Frese, M. (Eds.), Organizational planning: The psychology of performance (pp. 9–30). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., & Moertl, P. (2003) Cases of social innovation: Lessons from two innovations in the 20th century. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 261–266.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Osburn, H. K. (2002). Planning in organizations: Performance as a multi-level phenomenon. In Yammarino, F. J. & Dansereau, F. (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues: The many faces of multi-level issues (pp. 3–36). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Todd, E. M., Higgs, C., & McIntosh, T. (2017). Cognitive skills and leadership performance: The nine critical skills. The Leadership Quarterly, 28, 24–39.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Harding, F. D., Jacobs, T. O., & Fleishman, E. A. (2000). Leadership skills for a changing world: Solving complex social problems. The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 11–35.Google Scholar
Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage. New York: McGraw Hill Education.Google Scholar
Onarheim, B., & Biskjaer, M. M. (2015). Balancing constraints and the sweet spot as coming topics for creativity research. In Ball, L. J. (Ed.), Creativity in design: Understanding, capturing, supporting (pp. 1–19). Copenhagen: DTU.Google Scholar
Padilla, A. (2005). Portraits in leadership: Six extraordinary university presidents. Westport, CT: Praeger Press and the American Council on Education.Google Scholar
Partlow, P. J., Medeiros, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2015). Leader cognition in vision formation: Simplicity and negativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 448–469.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. R., Barrett, J. D., Hester, K. S. et al. (2013). Teaching people to manage constraints: Effects on creative problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redell, T., & Woolcock, G. (2004). From consultation to participatory governance? A critical review of citizen engagement strategies in Queensland. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63, 75–87.Google Scholar
Rodgers, E. M., & Adhikarya, R. (1979). Diffusion of innovations: Up to date review and commentary. In Nimmo, D. (Ed.), Communications Yearbook 3 (pp. 67–81). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Rouse, W. B., & Morris, N. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 349–363.Google Scholar
Schultz, W. (2006). Behavioral theories and the neurophysiology of reward. Annual Review Psychology, 57, 87–115.Google Scholar
Scott, G. M., Lonergan, D. C., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Conceptual combination: Alternative knowledge structures, alternative heuristics. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 79–98.Google Scholar
Shamir, B., House, R. S., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivating effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organizational Science, 4, 577–594.Google Scholar
Shipman, A. S., Byrne, C. L., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Leader vision formation and forecasting: The effects of forecasting extent, resources, and timeframe. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 439–456.Google Scholar
Shorris, E. (1981). The oppressed middle: politics of middle management: Scenes from corporate life. New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2001). What is the common thread of creativity? Its dialectical relation to intelligence and wisdom. American Psychologist, 56, 360–362.Google Scholar
Strange, J. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). The origins of vision: Effects of reflection, models, and analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 121–148.Google Scholar
Vincent, A. S., Decker, B. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 163–178.Google Scholar
Watson, D. (2007). Managing civic and community engagement. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Weerts, D. J., & Sandmann, L. R. (2010). Community engagement and boundary-spanning roles at research universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 81, 632–657.Google Scholar
Yukl, G. (2011). Leadership in organizations. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Zaccaro, S. J., Connelly, S., Repchick, K. M. et al. (2015). The influence of higher order cognitive capacities on leader organizational continuance and retention: The mediating role of developmental experiences. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 342–358.Google Scholar

References

Bartel, C. A., Saavedra, R., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Design conditions for learning in community service contexts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 367–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennis, W. G., & O’Toole, J. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 2005, 96–104.Google Scholar
Boss, J. A. (1994). The effect of community service on the moral development of college ethics students. Journal of Moral Development, 23, 183–198.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, P., Hayday, B., & Armstrong, R. (2007). Non-profit governance models: Problems and prospects. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 12, 5.Google Scholar
Brisbin, R. A., & Hunter, S. (2003). Community leaders’ perceptions of university and college efforts to encourage civic engagement. The Review of Higher Education, 26, 467–486.Google Scholar
Brown, K. G. (2014). From the editors: Themes, thanks, and thoughts on the future. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13, 505–509.Google Scholar
Bruni-Bossio, V., & Willness, C.R. (2016). The “Kobayashi-Maru” meeting: High fidelity experiential learning. Journal of Management Education, 40, 619–647.Google Scholar
Caspersz, D., & Olaru, D. (2017). The value of service-learning: The student perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 42, 685–700.Google Scholar
Castaneda, G., Islam, S., Stetten, N., Black, E., & Blue, A. (2017). What’s in it for me? Perspectives from community participants in an interprofessional service learning program. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 6, 15–21.Google Scholar
Clifford, D., & Petrescu, C. (2012). The keys to university–community engagement sustainability. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 23, 77–91.Google Scholar
Cummings, J. L., & Doh, J. P. (2000). Identifying who matters: Mapping key players in multiple environments. California Management Review, 42, 83–104.Google Scholar
DiPadova-Stocks, L. N. (2005). Two major concerns about service-learning: What if we don’t do it? And what if we do? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 345–353.Google Scholar
Dostillo, L. D., Brackmann, S. M., Edwards, K. E., Harrison, B., Kliewer, B. W., & Clayton, P. H. (2012). Reciprocity: Saying what we mean and meaning what we say. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 19, 17–32.Google Scholar
Dumas, C. (2002). Community-based service learning: Does it have a role in management education? International Journal of Value Based Management, 15, 249–264.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, T. (2000). Civic responsibility and higher education. Westport, CT: Oryx Press.Google Scholar
Elson, D., Johns, L., & Petrie, J. T. (2007). Jumpstart’s service-learning initiative: Enhanced outcomes for at-risk children. In Billig, S. & Gelmon, S. (Eds.), From passion to objectivity: International and cross-disciplinary perspectives on service-learning research (pp. 65–87). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
Eyler, J., & Giles, D. E., Jr. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Evans, D. V., Krasin, B., Brown, K., Dobie, S., & Kost, A. (2017). Student perceptions about benefits from an extracurricular curriculum: A qualitative study of the underserved pathway. Peer-Reviewed Reports in Medical Education Research, 1, 13.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2003). Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better. Academy of Management Executive, 17, 101–113.Google Scholar
Foster, D., & Jonker, J. (2005). Stakeholder relationships: The dialogue of engagement. Corporate Governance, 5, 51–57.Google Scholar
Gilbreath, B, Manning, M. R., Burchett, O., Wieters, C. D., Wright, C. R., & Powers, T. L. (2001). Using management advisory boards in the classroom. Journal of Management Education, 25, 32–53.Google Scholar
GMCTL (2017). Community-engaged learning. Gwenna Moss Centre for Teaching & Learning, University of Saskatchewan. Retrieved from https://teaching.usask.ca/articles/community-engaged-learning.php.Google Scholar
Godfrey, P. C. (2009). A moral argument for service-learning in management education. In Godfrey, P. C. & Grasso, E. T. (Eds.), Working for the common good: Concepts and models for service-learning in management (pp. 21–42). Sterling, VA: Stylus.Google Scholar
Godfrey, P. C., & Grasso, E. T. (2009). Introduction. In Godfrey, P. C. & Grasso, E. T. (Eds.), Working for the common good: Concepts and models for service-learning in management (pp. 1–10). Sterling, VA: Stylus.Google Scholar
Godfrey, P. C., Illes, L. M., & Berry, F. C. (2005). Creating breadth in business education through service learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 309–323.Google Scholar
Gorman, M. (1994). Service experience and the moral development of college students. Religious Education, 89, 422–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, M. J., Ondaatje, E. H., Fricker, R., Campbell, N., Rosenblatt, K., Geschwind, S., … Klein, S. P. (1998). Coupling service and learning in higher education. The Final Report of the Evaluation of the Learn and Serve America, Higher Education Program. Washington, DC: Corporation for National and Community Service.Google Scholar
Heinfeldt, J., & Wolf, F. (1998). Re-engineering the business curriculum: A stakeholder paradigm. Journal of Education for Business, 73, 198–201.Google Scholar
Hendry, K., & Kiel, G. C. (2004). The role of the board in firm strategy: Integrating agency and organizational control perspectives. Corporate Governance, 12, 500–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 206–221.Google Scholar
Kamal, M., & Henson, K. (2010). The role of advisory board in developing market sustainable IT curriculum. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 15, 168–173.Google Scholar
Kellogg Commission on the Future of State and Land-Grant Universities (1999). Returning to our roots: The engaged institution. Washington, DC: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges.Google Scholar
Kendrick, J. R. (1996). Outcomes of service-learning in an introduction to sociology course. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 2, 72–81.Google Scholar
Lenton, R., Sidhu, R., Kaur, S., Conrad, M., Kennedy, B., Munro, Y., & Smith, R. (2014). Community service learning and community-based learning as approaches to enhancing University service learning. Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.Google Scholar
Lowery, D., May, D. L., Duchane, K. A., Coulter-Kern, R., Bryant, D., Morris, P. V., & Bellner, M. (2006). A logic model for service-learning: Tensions and issues for further consideration. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 12(2), 47–60.Google Scholar
Lynton, E. A. (1991). New concepts of professional expertise: Liberal learning as part of career-oriented education. The Journal of General Education, 40, 11–23.Google Scholar
Madsen, S. R., & Turnbull, O. (2006). Academic service learning experiences of compensation and benefits course students. Journal of Management Education, 30, 724–742.Google Scholar
McClam, T., Diambra, J. F., Burton, B., Fuss, A., & Fudge, D. L. (2008). An analysis of a service-learning project: Students’ expectations, concerns, and reflections. Journal of Experiential Education, 30, 236–249.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, E. (2010). The “real-world” experience: Students’ perspectives on service-learning projects. American Journal of Business Education, 3, 109–117.Google Scholar
Miller-Milleson, J. (2003). Understanding the behavior of nonprofit boards of directors: A theory-based approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 521–44.Google Scholar
Morse, S. W. (1989). Renewing civic capacity: Preparing college students for service and citizenship. ASHE–ERIC higher education report. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research & Improvement.Google Scholar
Murillo, D., & Vallentin, S. (2016). The business school’s right to operate: Responsibilization and resistance. Journal of Business Ethics, 136, 743–757.Google Scholar
Muturi, N., & Mwangi, S. (2013). Students’ expectations and motivation for service-learning in public relations. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 68, 387–408.Google Scholar
Owen, S., & Stupans, I. (2007). Experiential placements: Dissemination and stakeholder engagement for curriculum planning action to prepare future pharmacy professionals. Journal of Learning Design, 3, 1–10.Google Scholar
Payne, S. L., Whitfield, J. M., & Flynn, J. A. (2002). Assessing the business capstone course through a method based on the SOTL and the stakeholder process. Journal of Education for Business, 78, 69–74.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1, 78–95.Google Scholar
Purdy, J. M., & Lawless, J. (2012). Learning about governance through nonprofit board service. Journal of Management Education, 36, 33–65.Google Scholar
Rubin, R. S., & Dierdorff, E. C. (2009). How relevant is the MBA? Assessing the alignment of required curricula and required managerial competencies. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8, 208–223.Google Scholar
Samuelson, J. (2009). Business education for the 21st century. In Godfrey, P. C. & Grasso, E. T. (Eds.), Working for the common good: Concepts and models for service-learning in management (pp. 11–20). Sterling, VA: Stylus.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. (2014). The use and value of advisory boards. Private Company Director. Retrieved from www.privatecompanydirector.com/index.php?/features/the-use-and-value-of-advisory-boards.Google Scholar
Srinivas, T., Meenan, C. E., Drogin, E., & DePrince, A. P. (2015). Development of the community impact scale measuring community organization perceptions of partnership benefits and costs. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 21, 5–21.Google Scholar
Stoecker, R., & Tryon, E. A. (2009). The unheard voices: Community organizations and service learning. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Swanson, L. (2013). A strategic engagement framework for nonprofits. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 23, 303–323.Google Scholar
Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 237–269.Google Scholar
Willness, C. R., & Bruni-Bossio, V. (2015). A stakeholder governance framework for curriculum development. In Willness, C.R. and Brown, K. (Chairs), Implementation of community-based experiential learning: Challenges, opportunities, and insights. 75th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
Willness, C. R., & Bruni-Bossio, V. (2017). The curriculum innovation canvas: A design thinking framework for the engaged educational entrepreneur. Journal of Higher Education Outreach & Engagement, 21, 134–164.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. C. (2011). Service-learning and the development of empathy in US college students. Education + Training, 53, 207–217.Google Scholar

References

Ahmed, S. M., Beck, B., Maurana, A., & Newton, G. (2004). Overcoming barriers to effective community-based participatory research in US medical schools. Education for Health, 17(2), 141–151.Google Scholar
Astin, A. W., & Astin, H. S. (2000). Leadership reconsidered: Engaging education in social change. Battle Creek, MI: W. K. Kellogg Foundation.Google Scholar
Astin, A. W., Vogelgesang, L. J., Ikeda, E. K., & Yee, J. A. (2000). How service learning affects students. Higher Education: Service Learning. Paper 144. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slcehighered/144.Google Scholar
Attree, P., French, B., Milton, B., Povall, S., Whitehead, M., & Popay, J. (2011). The experience of community engagement for individuals: A rapid review of evidence. Health & Social Care in the Community, 19(3), 250–260.Google Scholar
Bakker, A. B., & Bal, M. P. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(1), 189–206.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Oxford: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.Google Scholar
Bonsall, D. L., Harris, R. A., & Marczak, J. N. (2002). The community as a classroom. New Directions for Student Services, 2002(100), 85–96.Google Scholar
Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (2002). Campus–community partnerships: The terms of engagement. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 503–516.Google Scholar
Bruning, S. D., McGrew, S., & Cooper, M. (2006). Town–gown relationships: Exploring university–community engagement from the perspective of community members. Public Relations Review, 32(2), 125–130.Google Scholar
Buys, N., & Bursnall, S. (2007). Establishing university–community partnerships: Processes and benefits. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(1), 73–86.Google Scholar
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (2006). The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. 2005 edition. Menlo Park, CA: Author.Google Scholar
Celio, C. I., Durlak, J., & Dymnicki, A. (2011). A meta-analysis of the impact of service-learning on students. Journal of Experiential Education, 34(2), 164–181.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. G., Kotval-K, Z., Kotval, Z., & Mullin, J. (2014). University community partnerships. Humanities, 3(1), 88–101.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1938). Education and experience. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Driscoll, A. (2009). Carnegie’s new community engagement classification: Affirming higher education’s role in community. New Directions for Higher Education, 2009(147), 5–12.Google Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., Todd, A. R., Homan, A. C. et al. (2015). Maximizing the gains and minimizing the pains of diversity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 742–748.Google Scholar
Holland, B. A., & Gelmon, S. B. (1998). The state of the “engaged campus”: What have we learned about building and sustaining university–community partnerships. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 51, 3–6.Google Scholar
Jassawalla, A. R., & Sashittal, H. C. (1998). An examination of collaboration in high‐technology new product development processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(3), 237–254.Google Scholar
King, A. J., Johnson, D. D., & Van Vugt, M. (2009). The origins and evolution of leadership. Current Biology, 19(19), R911–R916.Google Scholar
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2001). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In Sternberg, R. J. & Zhang, L. F. (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive, learning, and thinking style (pp. 227–247), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212.Google Scholar
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351–398.Google Scholar
Maurrasse, D. J. (2013). Strategic public private partnerships. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.Google Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi‐sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315.Google Scholar
Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Davis, M. I., Ferrari, J. et al. (2004). University–community partnerships: A framework and an exemplar. In Jason, L., Keys, C., Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Taylor, R. R., Davis, M., Durlak, J., & Isenberg, D. (Eds.), Participatory community research: Theory and methods in action (pp. 105–120). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Weerts, D. J., & Sandmann, L. R. (2010). Community engagement and boundary-spanning roles at research universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(6), 632–657.Google Scholar
Wilson, P., Woolger, A., & Dodd, M. (2017). Students: Experience, engagement and communities (report to HEFCE by York Consulting, Leeds; York Consulting LLP). Retrieved from www.hefce.ac.uk/media/HEFCE,2014/Content/Pubs/Independentresearch/2017/Students,Experience,engagement,and,communities/studentseec.pdf.Google Scholar
Winston, G. C. (1999). Subsidies, hierarchy and peers: The awkward economics of higher education. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 13–36.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×