Abramson, Jeffrey (1994), We, the Jury: The Jury System and the Ideal of Democracy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Adams, James, Clark, Michael, Ezrow, Lawrence, and Glasgow, Garrett (2006), “Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different than Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of West European Parties' Policy Shifts, 1976–1998,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 50, no. 3: 513–29.Google Scholar

Adams, Ralph James Q., and Poirier, Philip P. (1987), Conscription Controversy in Great Britain, 1900–18. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agnone, Jon (2007), “Amplifying Public Opinion: The Policy Impact of the US Environmental Movement,” Social Forces, vol. 85, no. 4: 1593–620.Google Scholar

Amsden, Alice (1989), Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Andersen, Jørgen Goul, and Bjørklund, Tor (1990), “Structural Changes and New Cleavages: The Progress Parties in Denmark and Norway,” Acta Sociologica, vol. 33, no. 3: 195–217.Google Scholar

Arrington, Celeste L. (2014), “Leprosy, Legal Mobilization, and the Public Sphere in Japan and South Korea,” Law & Society Review, vol. 48, no. 3: 563–93.Google Scholar

Asaba, Yuki (2009), “Kankokuni okeru Seito Shisutemuno Henyo [The Transformation of the Korean Party System],” Yamaguchi Kenritsu Daigaku Gakujutsu Joho, vol. 2: 16–29.Google Scholar

Asaba, Yuki (2013), “Presidentialism in Korea: A Strong President and a Weak Government,” in Kasuya, Yuko, ed., Presidents, Assemblies, and Policy-Making in Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Asaba, Yuki, Onishi, Yutaka, and Haruki, Ikumi (2010), “Kankokuni okeru Senkyo Saikuru Fuicchino Seitou Seijieno Eikyo [President Lee Myung-bak's Government Formation in Korea: A Missing Link of Electoral Cycle in Party Politics],” Leviathan, vol. 47: 65–88.Google Scholar

Ashibe, Nobuyoshi (1997), Kenpo (Shinpan) [Constitutional Law (New Edition)]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar

Bakker, Ryan, and Hobolt, Sara B. (2013), “Measuring Party Positions,” in Evans, Geoffrey and Graaf, Nan Dirk de, eds., Political Choice Matters: Explaining the Strength of Class and Religious Cleavages in Cross-National Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bakker, Ryan, De Vries, Catherine, Edwards, Erica et al. (2015), “Measuring Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999–2010”. Party Politics, vol. 21, no. 1: 143–52.Google Scholar

Bauhr, Monika, and Grimes, Marcia, “Indignation or Resignation: The Implications of Transparency for Societal Accountability,” Governance, vol. 27, no. 2: 291–320.Google Scholar

Bennett, Mark W. (2010), “Unraveling the Gordian Knot of Implicit Bias in Jury Selection: The Problems of Judge-Dominated Voir Dire, the Failed Promise of Batson, and Proposed Solutions,” Harvard Law & Policy Review, vol. 4, no. 1: 149–71.Google Scholar

Benoit, Kenneth, and Laver, Michael (2006), Party Policy in Modern Democracies. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Benoit, Kenneth, and Laver, Michael (2007), “Estimating Party Policy Positions: Comparing Expert Surveys and Hand-Coded Content Analysis,” Electoral Studies, vol. 26, no. 1: 90–107.Google Scholar

Beramendi, Pablo, and Rueda, David (2007), “Social Democracy Constrained: Indirect Taxation in Industrialized Democracies,” British Journal of Political Science, vol. 37, no. 4: 619–41.Google Scholar

Bergalli, Roberto (1995), “The Spanish Attempt to Build a Democratic Criminal Justice System,” in Ruggiero, Vincenzo, Ryan, Mick, and Sim, Joe, eds., Western European Penal Systems: A Critical Anatomy. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Bergara, Mario, Richman, Barak, and Spiller, Pablo T. (2003), “Modeling Supreme Court Strategic Decision Making: The Congressional Constraint,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 2: 247–80.Google Scholar

Berger, Joseph, Bernard, B. Cohen, and Zelditch, Morris Jr. (1972), “Status Characteristics and Social Interactions,” American Sociological Review, vol. 37, no. 3: 241–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergoglio, Maria Inés (2003), “Argentina: The Effects of Democratic Institutionalization,” in Friedman, Lawrence M. and Perez-Perdomo, Rogelio, eds., Legal Culture in the Age of Globalization: Latin America and Latin Europe. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Black, Ryan C., and Owens, Ryan J. (2009), “Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court: The Collision of Policy and Jurisprudence,” Journal of Politics, vol. 71, no. 3: 1062–75.Google Scholar

Bliesener, Thomas (2006), “Lay Judges in the German Criminal Court: Social-Psychological Aspects of the German Criminal Justice System,” in Kaplan, Martin F. and Martin, Ana M., eds., Understanding World Jury Systems through Social Psychological Research. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 179–97.Google Scholar

Bloeser, Andrew J., McCurley, Carl, and Mondak, Jeffery J. (2012), “Jury Service as Civic Engagement Determinants of Jury Summons Compliance,” American Politics Research, vol. 40, no. 2: 179–204.Google Scholar

Bloodgood, Elizabeth A., Tremblay-Boire, Joannie, and Prakash, Aseem (2014), “National Styles of NGO Regulation,” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol. 43, no. 4: 716–36.Google Scholar

Bobek, Michal (2015), “Judicial Selection, Lay Participation, and Judicial Culture in the Czech Republic: A Study in a Central European (non) Transformation,” in Turenne, Sophie, ed., Fair Reflection of Society in Judicial Systems: A Comparative Study. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar

Bohman, James, and Rehg, William (1997), “Introduction,” in Bohman, James and Rehg, William, eds., Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bolleyer, Nicole (2012), “New Party Organization in Western Europe: Of Party Hierarchies, Stratarchies, and Federations,” Party Politics, vol. 18, no. 3: 315–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouissou, Jean-Marie (2001), “Party Factions and the Politics of Coalition: Japanese Politics under the ‘System of 1955’,” Electoral Studies, vol. 20, no. 4: 581–602.Google Scholar

Bowler, Shaun, Esterling, Kevin, and Holmes, Dallas (2014), “GOTJ: Get Out the Juror,” Political Behavior, vol. 36, no. 3: 515–33.Google Scholar

Bräuninger, Thomas, and König, Thomas (1999), “The Checks and Balances of Party Federalism: German Federal Government in a Divided Legislature”. European Journal of Political Research, vol. 36, no. 2: 207–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Rupert (2000), Group Processes: Dynamics within and between Groups. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Budge, Ian (2000), “Expert Judgements of Party Policy Positions: Uses and Limitations in Political Research,” European Journal of Political Research, vol. 37, no. 1: 103–13.Google Scholar

Budge, Ian, Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith, and Tanenbaum, Eric (2001), Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund (2008), The Evils of Revolution. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Calder, Kent E. (1988), Crisis and Compensation: Public Policy and Political Stability in Japan, 1949–1986. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Calder, Kent E. (1993), Strategic Capitalism: Private Business and Public Purpose in Japanese Industrial Finance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callander, Stephen, and Hummel, Patrick (2014), “Preemptive Policy Experimentation,” Econometrica, vol. 82, no. 4: 1509–28.Google Scholar

Capoccia, Giovanni, and Ziblatt, Daniel (2010), “The Historical Turn in Democratization Studies: A New Research Agenda for Europe and Beyond,” Comparative Political Studies, vol. 43, no. 8–9: 931–68.Google Scholar

Casper, Gerhard, and Zeisel, Hans (1972), “Lay Judges in the German Criminal Courts,” The Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 1, no. 1: 135–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Center for Jury Studies (n.d.), “The State-of-the-States Survey of Jury Improvements Efforts: Executive Summary,” available at www.ncsc-jurystudies.org/∼/media/Microsites/Files/CJS/SOS/sos_exec_sum.ashx, accessed February 7, 2015.Google Scholar

Chambers, Simone (2003), “Deliberative Democratic Theory,” Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 6: 307–26.Google Scholar

Chang, Hsun Chia (2009), “Taiwan ni okeru Shiho Kaikaku ni tsuite [Judicial Reform in Taiwan],” Kanagawa Law Journal, vol. 2: 39–41.Google Scholar

Chen, Yun-Tsai (2012), “Taiwan ni okeru Jinmin Kanshin Shiko Jorei Soan nitsuite [On the Lay Observer Trial System Bill],” Ronkyu Jurisuto, vol. 2: 90–5.Google Scholar

Chen, Weitseng, and Hsu, Jimmy Chiashin (2014), “Horizontal Accountability in a Polarized New Democracy: The Case of Post-Democratization Taiwan,” Australian Journal of Asian Law, vol. 15, no. 2: 1–19.Google Scholar

Chiou, Lian-gong (1998), “Taiwan ni okeru Shiho Kaikakuno Ugoki [Developments in Taiwanese Judicial Reform],” Ho no Shihai, vol. 108: 99–111.Google Scholar

Chiu, Hsuan-ju, and Peng, Chao-fen (2001), “Taiwan ni okuru Hono Juyoto Tenkai [The Acceptance and Development of Law in Taiwan],” Jurisconsultus, vol. 10: 151–66.Google Scholar

Cho, Kuk (2002), “The Unfinished Criminal Procedure Revolution of Post-Democratization South Korea,” Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, vol. 30, no. 3: 377–94.Google Scholar

Cho, Kuk (2008), “The Newly Introduced Criminal Jury Trial in Korea: A Historic Step Towards ‘Criminal Justice by the People’,” Australian Journal of Asian Law, vol. 10, no. 2: 268–89.Google Scholar

Choi, Jong-Sik (2008), “Kankokuni okeru Kokuminno Keiji Saiban Sanyo Seido [The Korean Criminal Jury],” Keiji Bengo, vol. 53: 163–69.Google Scholar

Choi, Jong-Sik (2013a), “Korean Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials: The Present Situation and Problems,” International Journal of Law, Crime, and Justice, vol. 42, no. 2: 83–102.Google Scholar

Choi, Jong-Sik (2013b), “Kankokuni okeru Kokumin Sanyo Keiji Saiban Seidono Saishu Keitai [The Final Form of the Korean Jury System],” Horitsu Jiho, vol. 85, no. 10: 88–94.Google Scholar

Chud, Adam M., and Berman, Michael L. (2000), “Six-Member Juries: Does Size Really Matter?” Tennessee Law Review, vol. 67, no. 3: 743–63.Google Scholar

Chung, Li-hua and Chung, Jake (2016), “Tsai Says Second Judicial Reform to be All-Inclusive,” Taipei Times, November 26, available at www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2016/11/26/2003660022, accessed December 26, 2016.Google Scholar

Clark, Tom S. (2009), “The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 53, no. 4: 971–89.Google Scholar

Coleman, John J. (1999), “Unified Government, Divided Government, and Party Responsiveness,” American Political Science Review, vol. 93, no. 4: 821–35.Google Scholar

Consejo General del Poder Judicial (2015), “Ley del Jurado (III),” Datos de Justicia Boletín de information Estadistica, No. 40, Junio, available at www.poderjudicial.es/cgpj/es/Temas/Estadistica-Judicial/Estudios-e-Informes/Datos-de-Justicia/, accessed January 2, 2017.Google Scholar

Corey, Zachary, and Hans, Valerie P. (2010), “Japan's New Lay Judge System: Deliberative Democracy in Action,” Asia-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, vol. 12, no. 1: 72–94.Google Scholar

Courts of Denmark (n.d.), “A Closer Look at the Courts of Denmark: Lay Judges and Jurors,” available at www.domstol.dk/om/publikationer/HtmlPublikationer/Profil/Profilbrochure%20-%20UK/kap08.html, accessed March 18, 2016.Google Scholar

Crespo, Virginia Martínez (2015), “Los Casos Tramitados con la Ley del Jurado Caen a la Mitad en 20 Años,” El País, July 14, available at http://politica.elpais.com/politica/2015/07/14/actualidad/1436875597_983440.html, accessed January 2, 2017.Google Scholar

Dainow, Russell (1967), “The Civil Law and Common Law: Some Points of Comparison,” American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 15, no. 3: 419–35.Google Scholar

Dalton, Russell J. (2008), “The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems,” Comparative Political Studies, vol. 41, no. 7: 899–920.Google Scholar

Dalton, Russell J. (2009), “Economics, Environmentalism, and Party Alignments: A Note on Partisan Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies,” European Journal of Political Research, vol. 48, no. 2: 161–75.Google Scholar

Dalton, Russell J., Scarrow, Susan E., and Cain, Bruce E. (2003), “New Forms of Democracy? Reform and Transformation of Democratic Institutions,” in Cain, Bruce E., Dalton, Russell J., and Scarrow, Susan E., eds., Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dalton, Russell J., and Tanaka, Aiji (2007), “The Patterns of Party Polarization in East Asia,” Journal of East Asian Studies, vol. 7, no. 2: 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dammer, Harry, and Albanese, Jay (2013), Comparative Criminal Justice Systems. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

Davison, Phil (1993), “Gonzalez Brings Independents into Spain's Cabinet: The Left Wing is Shut Out of New Government,” Independent, July 14, 1993, available at www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/gonzalez-brings-independents-into-spains-cabinet-the-left-wing-is-shut-out-of-new-government-1484781.html, accessed April 8, 2016.Google Scholar

Dawson, John P. (1960), A History of Lay Judges. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Deguchi, Yuichi (2000), “GHQno Shiho Kaikaku Koso kara Mita Senryouki Ho Keiju [Legal Transplantation During the Occupation Era as Seen from the GHQ's Vision for Judicial Reforms],” Hogaku Seijigaku Kenkyu, no. 44: 351–84.Google Scholar

Deguchi, Yuichi (2001), “GHQ no Shiho Kaikaku Kosoto Kokuminnno Shiho Sanka [The GHQ's Vision for Judicial Reforms and Popular Participation in the Judicial System],” Hogaku Seijigaku Ronkyu, no. 49: 149–81.Google Scholar

Delli Carpini, Michael X., Lomax Cook, Fay, and Jacobs, Lawrence R. (2004), “Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature,” Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 7: 315–44.Google Scholar

Democratic Progressive Party (n.d.), “Basic Policies,” available at www.dpp.org.tw/upload/history/20100604120114_link.pdf, accessed April 18, 2015.Google Scholar

Devine, Dennis J., Laura, D. Clayton, Dunford, Benjamin B., Seying, Rasmy, and Pryce, Jennifer (2001), “Jury Decision Making: 45 years of Empirical Research on Deliberating Groups,” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, vol. 7, no. 3: 622–727.Google Scholar

De Winter, Lieven (1998), “Conclusion: Toward a Comparative Analysis,” in De Winter, Lieven and Türsan, Huri, eds., Regionalist Parties in Western Europe. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Diamond, Sheri Seidman (1993), “What Jurors Think,” in Litan, Robert E., ed., Verdict: Assessing the Civil Jury System. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Diesen, Christian (2001), “Lay Judges in Sweden: A Short Introduction,” Revue Internationale de Droite Pénal, vol. 72, no. 1–2: 313–15.Google Scholar

Dobrovolskaia, Anna (2016), The Development of Jury Service in Japan: A Square Block in a Round Hole? Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Doheny, Shane, and O'Neill, Claire (2010), “Becoming Deliberative Citizens: The Moral Learning Process of the Citizen Juror,” Political Studies, vol. 58, no. 4: 630–48.Google Scholar

Donovan, James M. (2010), Juries and the Transformation of Criminal Justice in France in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John S. (2000), Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Duch, Raymond M., and Taylor, Michaell A. (1993), “Postmaterialism and the Economic Condition,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 37, no. 3: 747–79.Google Scholar

Eda, Satsuki (2000), “Shiminga Shuyakuno Shihoe [Towards a Justice System in which the Citizens are the Protagonists],” available at www.eda-jp.com/dpj/shihou.html, accessed February 19, 2015.Google Scholar

Eda, Satsuki (2002), “Shiminga Shuyakuno Shiho [A Justice System in which the Citizens are the Protagonists],” available at www.eda-jp.com/satsuki/2002/shihou.html, accessed November 3, 2016.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, Theodore, Hannaford-Agor, Paula. L., Hans, Valerie P. et al. (2005), “Judge-Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: A Partial Replication of Kalven and Zeisel's The American Jury”. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol. 2, no. 1: 171–207.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, Theodore, Hannaford-Agor, Paula L., Heise, Michael et al. (2006), “Juries, Judges, and Punitive Damages: Empirical Analyses Using the Civil Justice Survey of State Courts 1992, 1996, and 2001 Data,” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol. 3, no. 2: 263–95.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, Theodore, LaFountain, Neil, Ostrom, Brian, and Rottman, David (2002), “Juries, Judges, and Punitive Damages: An Empirical Study,” Cornell Law Review, vol. 87, no. 3: 743–82.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, Thomas, Heise, Michael, Waters, Nicole L., and Wells, Martin T. (2010), “The Decision to Award Punitive Damages: An Empirical Study,” Journal of Legal Analysis, vol. 2, no. 2: 577–620.Google Scholar

Encarnación, Omar G. (2008), Spanish Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn (1999), Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policymaking under Separate Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ertman, Thomas (2010), “The Great Reform Act of 1832 and British Democratization,” Comparative Political Studies, vol. 43, no. 8–9: 1000–22.Google Scholar

Feld, Lars P., and Voigt, Stefan (2003), “Economic Growth and Judicial Independence: Cross-Country Evidence Using a New Set of Indicators,” European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 19, no. 3: 497–527.Google Scholar

Fell, Dafydd (2005), Party Politics in Taiwan: Party Change and the Democratic Evolution of Taiwan, 1991–2004. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fell, Dafydd (2007), “Partisan Issue Competition in Contemporary Taiwan: Is Taiwan's Democracy Dead?” Chinese History and Society, vol. 32: 23–39.Google Scholar

Fell, Dafydd (2011), “The Polarization of Taiwan's Party Competition in the DPP Era,” in Ash, Robert and Prime, Penny, eds., Taiwan's Democracy and Future: Economic and Political Challenges. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fell, Dafydd (2013), “Impact of Candidate Selection Systems on Election Results: Evidence from Taiwan before and after the Change in Electoral Systems,” The China Quarterly, vol. 213: 152–71.Google Scholar

Finkel, Jodi (2005), “Judicial Reform as Insurance Policy: Mexico in the 1990s,” Latin American Politics & Society, vol. 47, no. 1: 87–113.Google Scholar

Finkel, Jodi (2008), Judicial Reform as Insurance: Argentina, Peru, and Mexico in the 1990s Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Fischer, Frank (2000), Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James S. (2009), When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Flynn, George Q. (2002), Conscription and Democracy: The Draft in France, Great Britain, and the United States. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Foley, Michael S. (2003), Confronting the War Machine: Draft Resistance during the Vietnam War. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Foote, Daniel H. (2014), “Citizen Participation: Appraising the Saiban’ in System,” Michigan State International Law Review, vol. 22, no. 3: 755–75.Google Scholar

Franzmann, Simon, and Kaiser, André (2006), “Locating Political Parties in Policy Space: A Re-Analysis of Party Manifesto Data,” Party Politics, vol. 12, no. 2: 163–88.Google Scholar

Fujimura, Naofumi (2013), “A New Day, A New Way: The Post Allocation of the Democratic Party of Japan under the Mixed-Member Majoritarian System,” Japan Forum, vol. 25, no. 2: 259–92.Google Scholar

Fukumoto, Kentaro (2000), Nihonno Kokkai Seiji: Zen Seifu Rippono Bunseki [Legislative Politics in Japan: An Analysis of All Legislation]. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai.Google Scholar

Fukumoto, Kentaro (2004), “Shijo Ronso Shohyo Masuyama Mikitaka cho Gikai Seidoto Nihon Seiji Giji Un'ei no Keiryo Seijigaku wo Megutte [Debating Mikitaka Masuyama's Agenda Power in the Japanese Diet],” Leviathan, vol. 35: 152–9.Google Scholar

Fukurai, Hiroshi (2011), “Japan's Quasi-Jury and Grand Jury Systems as Deliberative Agents of Social Change: De-Colonial Strategies and Deliberative Participatory Democracy,” Chicago-Kent Law Review, vol. 86, no. 2: 789–830.Google Scholar

Fukurai, Hiroshi, Chan, Kay-Wah, and Miyazawa, Setsuo (2010), “The Resurgence of Lay Adjudicatory Systems in East Asia,” Asia-Pacific Law and Policy Journal, vol. 12: i–xi.Google Scholar

Fukurai, Hiroshi, Knudtson, Clark Robert, and Lopez, Susan Irene (2009), “Is Mexico Ready for a Jury Trial?: Comparative Analysis of Lay Justice Systems in Mexico, the United States, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, and Ireland,” Mexican Law Review, vol. 2, no. 1: 3–44.Google Scholar

Fukurai, Hiroshi, and Hans, Valerie P. (2012), “Special Feature: The Future of Lay Adjudication in Korea and Japan,” Yonsei Law Journal, vol. 3, no. 1: 25–35.Google Scholar

Fukushima, Mizuho (2001), “Shiho Seido Kaikaku Shingikai Chukan Hokokuni tsuite [On the Interim Report of the Justice System Reform Council],” Shakai Minshu, vol. 550: 111–13.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Tatsuo (2002), “Taiwan: Shiho Zenryoikini wataru ‘Kaizo’ [Taiwan: Remaking the Entire Judicial System],” Ajiken World Trend, vol. 77: 12–15.Google Scholar

Furukawa, Teijiro (2004), “Shiho Seido Kaikakuni tsuite [On Judicial Reforms],” Shiho Kaikaku Chosa Shitsuho, vol. 3: 2–24.Google Scholar

Gadbin-George, Geraldine (2012), “Towards a Mutation of the Language of Criminal Trial in French and British Courts? The Influence of the Part Played by Juries on Judges' Discourse,” Comparative Law Review, vol. 3, no. 2: 1–22.Google Scholar

Gallup, Korea (n.d.), “The President's Job Approval Rating Since 1988,” available at www.gallup.co.kr/english/social.asp, accessed December 14, 2016.Google Scholar

Gastil, John, Black, Laura W., Deess, E. Pierre, and Leighter, Jay (2008), “From Group Member to Democratic Citizen: How Deliberating with Fellow Jurors Reshapes Civic Attitudes,” Human Communication Research, vol. 34, no. 1: 137–69.Google Scholar

Gastil, John, Deess, E. Pierre, and Weiser, Phil (2002), “Civic Awakening in the Jury Room: A Test of the Connection between Jury deliberation and Political Participation,” Journal of Politics, vol. 64, no. 2: 585–95.Google Scholar

Gastil, John, Deess, E. Pierre, Weiser, Philip J., and Simmons, Cindy (2010), The Jury and Democracy: How Jury Deliberation Promotes Civic Engagement and Political Participation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gastil, John, and Weiser, Philip J. (2006), “Jury Service as an Invitation to Citizenship: Assessing the Civil Value of Institutionalized Deliberation,” Policy Studies Journal, vol. 34, no. 4: 605–27.Google Scholar

Gee, Graham (2015), The Politics of Judicial Independence in the UK's Changing Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Giles, Micheal W., and Lancaster, Thomas D. (1989), “Political Transition, Social Development, and Legal Mobilization in Spain,” American Political Science Review, vol. 83, no. 3: 817–33.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom (2001), “Dismantling the Developmental State? Administrative Procedure Reform in Japan and Korea,” American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 49, no. 4: 585–625.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom (2003), Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom (2010), “The Constitutional Court and the Judicialization of Korean Politics,” in Harding, Andrew and Nicholson, Penelope, eds., New Courts in Asia. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom (2012), “Competitive Modernization: The Politics of Legal and State Reform in Northeast Asia,” Presented at the Conference on State and Asia, Leiden, Netherlands, December 2012, available at http://media.leidenuniv.nl/legacy/tom-ginsburg.pdf, accessed March 5, 2015.Google Scholar

Glaeser, Edward L., and Shleifer, Andrei (2002), “Legal Origins,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 117, no. 4: 1193–229.Google Scholar

Gómez, Arturo Todoli (2009), “El Recurso de Apelación contra la Sentencia en el Proceso ante el Tribunal del Jurado,” Noticias Jurídicas, July 1, available at http://noticias.juridicas.com/conocimiento/articulos-doctrinales/4467-el-recurso-de-apelacion-contra-la-sentencia-en-el-proceso-ante-el-tribunal-del-jurado/, accessed January 2, 2017.Google Scholar

Guinther, John (1998), The Jury in America. New York: Facts on File.Google Scholar

Gunther, Richard, and Montero, José Ramón (2009), The Politics of Spain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis (1996), Democracy and Disagreement: Why Moral Conflict Cannot be Avoided in Politics, and What Should be Done about It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis (2004), Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ha, Tae-Hoon (2010), “Shimin Dantai kara mita Kokumin Sanyo Saiban [The Korean Jury from the Perspective of Civil Society],” Hogaku Seminar, vol. 55, no. 6: 42–5.Google Scholar

Haas, Peter M. (1992), “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination,” International Organization, vol. 46, no. 1: 1–35.Google Scholar

Hall, Peter A., ed. (1989), The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism Across Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hamai, Koichi, and Ellis, Tom (2008), “Genbatsuka: Growing Penal Populism and the Changing Role of Public Prosecutors in Japan?” Hanzai Shakaigaku Kenkyu, vol. 33: 67–92.Google Scholar

Han, In-Sup (2015), “Kankokuno Kokumin Sanyo Saiban (Baishin-in Saiban) [The Jury Trial in South Korea],” Hogaku Seminar, vol. 60, no. 8: 62–8.Google Scholar

Han, Sang Hoon, and Park, Kwangbai (2012), “Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials of Korea: A Statistical Portrait of the First Four Years,” Yonse Law Journal, vol. 3: 55–66.Google Scholar

Hanashi, Yasuhiro (2004), “Kokkai deno Shitsumon Iken Hyomei 16kai (Jimito Giinchu Saita [Posed Sixteen Questions and Comments in the Parliament: The Most Among LDP Dietmembers],” available at www.hanashiyasuhiro.com/3679, accessed July 22, 2015.Google Scholar

Hans, Valerie P. (2008), “Jury Systems Around the World,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, vol. 4: 275–97.Google Scholar

Hans, Valerie P., and Germain, Claire M. (2011), “The French Jury at a Crossroads,” Chicago-Kent Law Review, vol. 86: 737–68.Google Scholar

Harada, Kunio (2013), “Saiban-in Saibanni okeru Ryokei Keiko [Trends in Sentencing Patterns Under the Saiban-in Trials],” Keio Hogaku, vol. 27: 161–87.Google Scholar

Harvey, Anna, and Friedman, Barry (2006), “Pulling Punches: Congressional Constraints on the Supreme Court's Constitutional Rulings, 1987–2000,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 4: 533–62.Google Scholar

Helbling, Marc, and Tresch, Anke (2011), “Measuring Party Positions and Issue Salience from Media Coverage: Discussing and Cross-Validating New Indicators,” Electoral Studies, vol. 30, no. 1: 174–83.Google Scholar

Hellmann, Olli (2014), “Party System Institutionalization Without Parties: Evidence from Korea,” Journal of East Asian Studies, vol. 14, no. 1: 53–84.Google Scholar

Helmke, Gretchen (2002), “The Logic of Strategic Defection: Court-Executive Relations in Argentina under Dictatorship and Democracy,” American Political Science Review, vol. 96, no. 2: 291–303.Google Scholar

Helmke, Gretchen (2005), Courts under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Helmke, Gretchen, and Rosenbluth, Frances (2009), “Regimes and the Rule of Law: Judicial Independence in Comparative Perspective,” Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 12: 345–66.Google Scholar

Hendler, Catedra (2005), “Jury Trials in Argentina,” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Las Vegas, NV, available at www.catedrahendler.org/doctrina_in.php?id=31, accessed February 15, 2015.Google Scholar

Hendler, Edmundo (2008/9), “Lay Participation in Argentina: Old History, Recent Experience,” Southwestern Journal of International Law, vol. 15, no. 1: 1–30.Google Scholar

Heo, Uk, and Stockton, Hans (2005), “The Impact of Democratic Transition on Elections and Parties in South Korea,” Party Politics, vol. 11, no. 6: 674–88.Google Scholar

Herron, Erik S., and Randazzo, Kirk A. (2003), “The Relationship between Independence and Judicial Review in Post-Communist Courts,” Journal of Politics, vol. 65, no. 2: 422–38.Google Scholar

Hersch, Joni, and Viscusi, W. Kip (2004), “Punitive Damages: How Judges and Juries Perform,” The Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 33, no. 1: 1–36.Google Scholar

Heuer, Larry, and Penrod, Steven (1994), “Trial Complexity: A Field Investigation of Its Meaning and its Effects,” Law and Human Behavior, vol. 18, no. 1: 29–51.Google Scholar

Higuchi, Naoto, Ito, Midori, Tanabe, Shunsuke, and Matsutani, Mitsuru (2009), “Explaining Japan's Lack of Green Parties: A Socio-Milieu Approach,” Paper Presented at the XXI World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar

Hirschl, Ran (2002), Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hix, Simon, and Jun, Hae-Won (2009), “Party Behavior in the Parliamentary Arena: The Case of the Korean National Assembly,” Party Politics, vol. 15, no. 6: 667–94.Google Scholar

Ho, Ming-Sho (2005), “Weakened State and Movement: The Paradox of Taiwanese Environmental Politics after the Power Transfer,” Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 14, no. 43: 339–52.Google Scholar

Hoeglinger, Dominic (2016), “The Politicisation of European Integration in Domestic Election Campaigns,” West European Politics, vol. 39, no. 1: 44–63.Google Scholar

Hofferbert, Richard I., and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (1990), “The Policy Impact of Party Programmes and Government Declarations in the Federal Republic of Germany,” European Journal of Political Research, vol. 18, no. 3: 277–304.Google Scholar

Holsti, Ole (1998/9), “A Widening Gap between the U.S. Military and Civilian Society? Some Evidence, 1976–99,” International Security, vol. 23, no. 3: 5–42.Google Scholar

Homusho (various years), Kensatsu Tokei Nenpo [Annual Report of Statistics on Prosecution]. Tokyo: Homu Daijin Kanbo Shiho Hoseichosabu Chosa Tokeika.Google Scholar

Honjo, Takeshi (2003), “Saiban-in no Ryokei Sanka [Participation of Saiban-in in the Sentencing Process],” Hitotsubashi Ronso, vol. 129, no. 1: 22–40.Google Scholar

Hooghe, Liesbet, Marks, Gary, and Wilson, Carole J. (2002), “Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?” Comparative Political Studies, vol. 35, no. 8: 965–89.Google Scholar

Hoover, Dennis R., and Dulk, Kevin R. den (2004), “Christian Conservatives Go to Court: Religion and Legal Mobilization in the United States and Canada,” International Political Science Review, vol. 25, no. 1: 9–34.Google Scholar

Hopkin, Jonathan (1999), Party Formation and Democratic Transition in Spain: The Creation and Collapse of the Union of the Democratic Centre. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Horan, Jacqueline (2005), “Perceptions of the Civil Jury System,” Monash University Law Review, vol. 31, no. 1: 134–51.Google Scholar

House of Councillors (n.d.), “Sangiinno Aramashi [Makeup of the House of Councillors],” available at www.sangiin.go.jp/japanese/aramashi/keyword/kaiha.html, accessed February 18, 2015.Google Scholar

Howell, William, Adler, E. Scott, Cameron, Charles, and Riemann, Charles (2000), “Divided Government and the Legislative Productivity of Congress, 1945–94,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 2: 285–312.Google Scholar

Huang, Kuo-Chang, Chen, Kong-Pin, and Lin, Chang-Chin (2010), “Does the Type of Criminal Defense Counsel Affect Case Outcomes? A Natural Experiment in Taiwan,” International Review of Law and Economics, vol. 30, no. 2: 113–27.Google Scholar

Huang, Kuo-Chang, and Lin, Chang-Ching (2013), “Rescuing Confidence in the Judicial System: Introducing Lay Participation in Taiwan,” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol. 10, no. 3: 542–69.Google Scholar

Huber, John, and Inglehart, Ronald (1995), “Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies,” Party Politics, vol. 1, no. 1: 73–111.Google Scholar

Huber, John D., and Shipan, Charles R. (2002), Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huckfeldt, Robert, Johnson, Paul E., and Sprague, John (2004), Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Husa, Jaakko (2004), “Classification of Legal Families Today: Is it Time for a Memorial Hymn?” Revue International de Droit Comparé, vol. 56, no. 1: 11–38.Google Scholar

Iaryczower, Matías, Spiller, Pablo T., and Tommasi, Mariano (2002), “Judicial Independence in Unstable Environments, Argentina 1935–1998,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 46, no. 4: 699–716.Google Scholar

Iaryczower, Matias, Spiller, Pablo T., and Tommasi, Mariano (2006), “Judicial Lobbying: the Politics of Labor Law Constitutional Interpretation,” American Political Science Review, vol. 100, no. 1: 85–97.Google Scholar

Ibusuki, Makoto (2010), “Quo Vadis?: First Year Inspection to Japanese Mixed Jury Trial,” Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, vol. 12, no. 1: 24–58.Google Scholar

Iimuro, Katsuhiko (2000), “Saraba Omakase Shiho [Taking Control of the Judicial Process],” Shiho Kaikaku, vol. 2, no. 2: 53–6.Google Scholar

Imamura, Kaku (2008), Enzai Bengoshi [Defense Lawyers for Wrongful Convictions]. Tokyo: Shumposha.Google Scholar

Imaseki, Motonari (2013), “Kenryokuka shita Kensatsu Shinsakai [The Prosecutorial Review Commission Gains Powers],” Yomiuri Online, available at www.yomiuri.co.jp/adv/wol/opinion/society_130318.html, accessed March 28, 2016.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald (1988), “The Renaissance of Political Culture,” American Political Science Review, vol. 82, no. 4: 1203–30.Google Scholar

Inoguchi, Takashi (1987), “Japan 1960–1980: Party Programmes in Elections,” in Budge, Ian, ed., Ideology, Strategy, and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Inoguchi, Takashi, and Iwai, Tomoaki (1987), “Zoku Giin” no Kenkyu [A Study of “Zoku” Dietmembers]. Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shimbunsha.Google Scholar

Ito, Kazuko (2011), “‘Nejire Kokkai’ ni okeru Kokkai Shingino Shoso [The Various Aspects of Deliberations in the Divided Diet],” Hokudai Hogaku Ronshu, vol. 61, no. 5: 1730–56.Google Scholar

Jackson, John D., and Kovalev, Nikolay P. (2006/7), “Lay Adjudication and Human Rights in Europe,” Columbia Journal of European Law, vol. 13: 83–123.Google Scholar

Janowitz, Morris (1983), The Reconstruction of Patriotism: Education for Civic Consciousness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Jennings, M. Kent (1987), “Residues of a Movement: The Aging of the American Protest Generation,” American Political Science Review, vol. 81, no. 2: 367–82.Google Scholar

Jennings, M. Kent (2002), “Generation Units and the Student Protest Movement in the United States: An Intra- and Intergenerational Analysis,” Political Psychology, vol. 23, no. 2: 303–24.Google Scholar

“Jihaku Nerau Koryu, Mitomenu Hoko [A Decline in Rejection of Detentions for the Sake of Inducing Confessions],” Asahi Shimbun, April 21, 2008.Google Scholar

Jeon, Jin Young, and Machidori, Satoshi (2015), “Seitono Ittaiseiha Ikanishite Kakuho Sarerunoka [How is Party Discipline Achieved]?” in Kang, Won-Taek, Asaba, Yuki, and Gyu Go, Seon, eds., Nikkan Seiji Seido Hikaku [Comparing Japanese and Korean Political Institutions]. Tokyo: Keio Daigaku Shuppankai.Google Scholar

Jimeno-Bulnes, Mar (2004), “Lay Participation in Spain: The Jury System,” International Criminal Justice Review, vol. 14: 164–85.Google Scholar

Jimeno-Bulnes, Mar (2007), “A Different Story Line for 12 Angry Men: Verdicts Reached by Majority Rule-The Spanish Perspective,” Chicago-Kent Law Review, vol. 82, no. 2: 759–75.Google Scholar

Jimeno-Bulnes, Mar (2011), “Jury Selection and Jury Trial in Spain: Between Theory and Practice,” Chicago-Kent Law Review, vol. 86, no. 2: 585–612.Google Scholar

Jiyu, Minshuto (1998), “Shiho Seido Tokubetsu Chosakai Houkoku 21-seiki no Shihono Tashikana Shishin [A Solid Framework for the Justice System for the 21st Century: A Report by the Special Research Commission on the Justice System],” Jiyuto Seigi, vol. 49, no. 8: 194–7.Google Scholar

Jiyu, Minshuto (2000), “21-seiki no Shiho no Tashikana Ippo [A Firm Step Forward for the Judicial System in the 21st Century],” Jiyu to Seigi, vol. 51, no. 7: 136–48.Google Scholar

Johnson, Chalmers (1982), MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy: 1925–1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, David (2002), The Japanese Way of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, David (2008), “Japanese Punishment in Comparative Perspective,” Japanese Journal of Sociological Criminology, vol. 33: 46–66.Google Scholar

Jou, Willy (2011), “How do Citizens in East Asian Democracies Understand Left and Right?” Japanese Journal of Political Science, vol. 12, no. 1: 33–55.Google Scholar

Judicial Yuan (n.d.), “Results from Survey on Advisory Jury System,” conducted November 1–5, 2012, available at www.judicial.gov.tw/Guan-Shen/study03.asp, accessed July 14, 2015.Google Scholar

Judicial Yuan (2012), “Ssu fa yuan jen min kuan shen chih tu yen i tzu liao hui pien (Documents on the Judicial Yuan's Discussions over the Lay Observer System [Part 1 of 2]),” available at www.judicial.gov.tw/LayParticipation/download/%E5%8F%B8%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%91%E8%A7%80%E5%AF%A9%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6%E7%A0%94%E8%AD%B0%E8%B3%87%E6%96%99%E5%BD%99%E7%B7%A8(%E4%B8%8A).pdf, accessed July 7, 2015.Google Scholar

Judicial Yuan (2014), Statute on the Pilot Implementation of the Advisory Jury System in Trial (Draft). Taipei: Judicial Yuan.Google Scholar

Ka, Sangjoon, and Nishino, Junya (2015), “Shissei Chusubuni Kansuru Nikkan Hikaku [Comparing Japan and Korea's Core Executive],” in Kang, Won-Taek, Asaba, Yuki, and Gyu Go, Seon, eds., Nikkan Seiji Seido Hikaku [Comparing Japanese and Korean Political Institutions]. Tokyo: Keio Daigaku Shuppankai.Google Scholar

Kaarbo, Juliet (1996), “Power and Influence in Foreign Policy Decision Making: The Role of Junior Coalition Partners in German and Israeli Foreign Policy,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 4: 501–30.Google Scholar

Kaarbo, Juliet (2008), “Coalition Cabinet Decision Making: Institutional and Psychological Factors,” International Studies Review, vol. 10, no. 1: 57–86.Google Scholar

Kage, Rieko (2015), “Nihonnni okueru Saiban-in Seidono Sosetsu [The Founding of the Saiban-in System in Japan],” in Takahashi, Yuriko, ed., Akauntabiriti Kaikakuno Seijigaku. Tokyo: Yuhikaku.Google Scholar

Kalven, Harry Jr., and Zeisel, Hans (1966), The American Jury. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Kamikawa, Ryunoshin (2010), Koizumi Kaikakuno Seijigaku [Analyzing Koizumi's Reforms]. Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Shimposha.Google Scholar

Kanda, Hiroki (2014), “Sengo Shuyo Seitono Hensento Kokkainai Seiryokuno Suii [The Postwar Evolution of Major Parties in Japan and Their Pariamentary Seat Shares],” Refarensu, vol. 64, no. 6: 41–64.Google Scholar

Kang, Won-Taek, and Asaba, Yuki (2015), “Bunkatsu Seifuno Nikkan Hikaku [Comparing Divided Government in Japan and South Korea],” in Kang, Won-Taek, Asaba, Yuki, and Go, Seon Gyu, eds., Nikkan Seiji Seido Hikaku [Comparing Japanese and Korean Political Institutions]. Tokyo: Keio Gijuku Daigaku Shuppankai.Google Scholar

Kaplan, Martin F., and Martin, Ana M. (1999), “Effects of Differential Status of Group Members on Process and Outcome of Deliberation,” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, vol. 2, no. 4: 347–64.Google Scholar

Kaplan, Martin F., and Martín, Ana M., eds. (2006), Understanding World Jury Systems Through Social Psychological Research. New York and Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Kaplan, Martin F., Martín, Ana M., and Hertel, Janine (2014), “Issues and Prospects in European Juries: An Overview,” in Kaplan, Martin F. and Martín, Ana M., eds., Understanding World Jury Systems Through Social Psychological Research. New York and Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Kasuya, Yuko (2013a), “Introduction,” in Kasuya, Yuko, ed., Presidents, Assemblies, and Policy-Making in Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kasuya, Yuko (2013b), “A Framework for Analysing Presidential-Legislative Relations in Asia,” in Kasuya, Yuko, ed., Presidents, Assemblies, and Policy-Making in Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kato, Junko (2003), Regressive Taxation and the Welfare State: Path Dependence and Policy Diffusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kato, Junko (2014), “Expert Survey Results in Japan 1996–2012,” available at www.katoj.j.u-tokyo.ac.jp/, accessed March 3, 2015.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J. (1985). Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Keizai Doyukai (1994), Gendai Nihonno Byorito Shoho [The Pathologies of Contemporary Japan: Prescriptions]. Tokyo: Keizai Doyukai.Google Scholar

Keizai Doyukai (1997), Gurobarukani Taiosuru Kigyo Hoseino Seibiwo Mezashite [Towards a Corporate Law System that Responds to Globalization]. Tokyo: Keizai Doyukai.Google Scholar

Kelly, Terrence (2004), “Unlocking the Iron Cage: Public Administration in the Deliberative Democratic Theory of Jürgen Habermas,” Administration & Society, vol. 36, no. 1: 38–61.Google Scholar

Kier, Elizabeth (1999), Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine Between the Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kim, Sangjoon, Park, Jaihyun, Park, Kwangbai, and Eom, Jin-Sup (2013), “Judge-Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: The First Three Years of the Korean Jury System,” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol. 10, no. 1: 35–53.Google Scholar

Kim, Wonik (2010), “Does Class Matter? Social Cleavages in South Korea's Electoral Politics in the Era of Neoliberalism,” Review of Political Economy, vol. 22, no. 4: 589–616.Google Scholar

Kimura, Masato (2015), “Muchini Motozku Chobatsu Ishiki? [Misinformed Citizen and Death Penalty],” Takachiho Ronso, vol. 50, no. 2: 23–46.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert (1994), The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert (2013), Democratic Accountability and Linkages Project. Durham, NC: Duke University.Google Scholar

Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (1995), “Party Positions and Voter Orientations,” in Klingemann, Hans-Dieter and Fuchs, Dieter, eds., Citizens and the State. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 183–205.Google Scholar

Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith, Budge, Ian, and McDonald, Michael (2006), Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Knill, Christoph, Debus, Marc, and Heichel, Stephan (2010), “Do Parties Matter in Internationalised Policy Areas? The Impact of Political Parties on Environmental Policy Outputs in 18 OECD Countries, 1970–2000,” European Journal of Political Research, vol. 49, no. 3: 301–36.Google Scholar

Knutsen, Oddbjørn (1998), “Expert Judgments on the Left-Right Location of Political Parties: A Longitudinal Study,” West European Politics, vol. 21, no. 2: 63–94.Google Scholar

Koga, Tsuyoshi, Kirimura, Yasue, and Okumura, Makito (2010), “Teikoku Gikai oyobi Kokkaino Rippo Tokei [Statistics on Legislation in the Imperial Diet and the Postwar Diet],” Refarensu, vol. 60, no. 11: 117–55.Google Scholar

Koike, Shintaro (2016), “Ryokei Handanno Arikata [Sentencing],” Keiho Zasshi, vol. 55, no. 2: 346–60.Google Scholar

Kojima, Toru (2015), “Saiban-in Saibanni yoru Ryokeino Henka [Changes in Sentencing since the Introduction of the Saiban-in System],” Chukyo Hogaku, vol. 49, no. 3–4, 169–97.Google Scholar

König, Thomas, Marbach, Moritz, and Osnabrügge, Moritz (2013), “Estimating Party Positions across Countries and Time—A Dynamic Latent Variable Model for Manifesto Data,” Political Analysis, vol. 21, no. 4: 468–91.Google Scholar

“Koryu Seikyu Kyakka Kyuzo [A Steep Increase in Rejected Requests for Detention Warrants]” (2015), Mainichi Shimbun, December 24.Google Scholar

Kovalev, Nikolai (2010), Criminal Justice Reform in Russia, Ukraine, and the Former Republics of the Soviet Union: Trial by Jury and Mixed Courts. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar

Kovalev, Nikolai, and Suleymenova, Gulnar (2010), “New Kazakhstani Quasi-Jury System: Challenges, Trends and Reforms,” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, vol. 38, no. 4: 261–78.Google Scholar

Krebs, Ron R. (2006), Fighting for Rights: Military Service and the Politics of Citizenship. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Kudo, Mika (2004a), “Kankoku Shiho Kaikaku Iinkaito Nichibenren Chosano Gaiyo [The Korean Reform Committee and Overview of the JFBA Study Team],” Shiho Kaikaku Chosa Shitsuho, vol. 4: 2–13.Google Scholar

Kudo, Mika (2004b), “Kankokuno Shiho Kaikaku kara Manabu [Learning from Korea's Judicial Reforms],” Hogaku Seminar, vol. 49, no. 11: 59–63.Google Scholar

Kutnjak Ivković, Sanja (1999), Lay Participation in Criminal Trials: The Case of Croatia. Lanham, MD: Austin and Winfield Publishers.Google Scholar

Langbein, John H. (1981), “Mixed Court and Jury Court: Could the Continental Alternative Fill the American Need?” Law & Social Inquiry, vol. 6, no. 1: 195–219.Google Scholar

Langer, Máximo (2004), “From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: The Globalization of Plea-Bargaining and the Americanization Thesis in Criminal Procedure,” Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 45, no. 1: 1–64.Google Scholar

Laver, Michael J., and Benoit, Kenneth (2005), “Estimating Party Positions: Japan in Comparative Context,” Japanese Journal of Political Science, vol. 6, no. 2: 187–209.Google Scholar

Laver, Michael J., and Budge, Ian (1992), “Measuring Policy Distances and Modelling Coalition Formation,” in Laver, Michael J. and Budge, Ian, eds., Party Policy and Government Coalitions. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Laver, Michael, and Hunt, W. Ben (1992), Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Leal, David L. (1999), “It's Not Just a Job: Military Service and Latino Political Participation,” Political Behavior, vol. 21, no. 2: 153–74.Google Scholar

Lee, Dong-hee (2011a), “Kankoku Kokumin Sanyo Saibanno Genjo to Kadai (Jou) [The Korean Jury System: Current State and Issues for the Future (Part 1)],” Kikan Keiji Bengo, vol. 67: 182–93.Google Scholar

Lee, Dong-hee (2011b), “Kankoku Kokumin Sanyo Saibanno Genjo to Kadai (Ge) [The Korean Jury System: Current State and Issues for the Future (Part 2)],” Kikan Keiji Bengo, vol. 68: 197–204.Google Scholar

Lee, Eun-Mo (2008), “Kankokuno Kokumin Sanyo Saiban Seidono Naiyoto Mondaiten [An Introduction of the New Civil Participatory Criminal Trials System in Korea],” Nomos, vol. 23: 65–76.Google Scholar

Lee, Jae-Hyup (2009), “Getting Citizens Involved: Civic Participation in Judicial Decision-Making in Korea,” University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review, vol. 4, no. 2: 177–207.Google Scholar

Lee, John Sanghyun (2016), “Transplanting Jury Trials in South Korean Legal Soils: Comparative Analysis with Jury Trials in the United States,” Asian Journal of Criminology, vol. 11, no. 2: 111–33.Google Scholar

Legislative Yuan (n.d.), “Minutes of the Legislative Yuan,” available at http://lci.ly.gov.tw/LyLCEW/lcivAgendarec.action#pageName_searchResult=1, accessed March 21, 2016.Google Scholar

Leib, Ethan J. (2007), “A Comparison of Criminal Jury Decision Rules in Democratic Countries,” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, vol. 5, no. 2: 629–44.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Pola, Matthie, Theres, Merz, Nicolas, Regel, Sven, and Werner, Annika (2015), Manifesto Corpus. Version: 2015–5. Berlin: WZB Berlin Social Science Center.Google Scholar

Levi, Margaret (1996), “The Institution of Conscription,” Social Science History, vol. 20, no. 1: 133–67.Google Scholar

Levi, Margaret (1997), Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levine, Dennis J., Clayton, Laura D., Dunford, Benjamin B., Seying, Rasmy, and Pryce, Jennifer (2001), “Jury Decision Making: 45 Years of Empirical Research on Deliberating Groups,” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, vol. 7, no. 3: 622–727.Google Scholar

Linzer, Drew A., and Staton, Jeffrey K. (2015), “A Global Measure of Judicial Independence, 1948–2012,” Journal of Law and Courts, vol. 3, no. 2: 223–56.Google Scholar

Lloyd-Bostock, Sally, and Thomas, Cheryl (1999), “The Decline of the ‘Little Parliament’: Juries and Jury Reform in England and Wales,” Law and Contemporary Problems, vol. 62, no. 2: 7–40.Google Scholar

Luebbert, Gregory M. (1991), Liberalism, Fascism, or Social Democracy: Social Classes and the Political Origins of Regimes in Interwar Europe. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lupu, Noam (2014), “Party Polarization and Mass Partisanship: A Comparative Perspective,” Political Behavior, vol. 37, no. 2: 331–56.Google Scholar

McElwain, Kenneth Mori, and Winkler, Christian G. (2015), “What's Unique about the Japanese Constitution?: A Comparative and Historical Analysis,” The Journal of Japanese Studies, vol. 41, no. 2: 249–80.Google Scholar

Machura, Stefan (2001), “Interaction between Lay Assessors and Professional Judges in German Mixed Courts,” Revue Internationale de Droit Pénal, vol. 72, no. 1–2: 451–79.Google Scholar

Mackerras, Malcolm, and McAllister, Ian (1999), “Compulsory Voting, Party Stability and Electoral Advantage in Australia,” Electoral Studies, vol. 18, no. 2: 217–33.Google Scholar

Maeda, Naoki (2014), “Liu Wen-ching Chen Yu-erh Jikento Amnesty International Nihonnon Setsuritsu [Contract Point between Taiwan Independent Movement in Japan and the Foundation of AI],” Hiroshima Hogaku, vol. 38, no. 2: 74–81.Google Scholar

Malsch, Marijke (2009), Democracy in the Courts: Lay Participation in European Criminal Justice Systems. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Manow, Philip, and Burkhart, Simone (2007), “Legislative Self-Restraint under Divided Government in Germany, 1976–2002,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 2: 167–91.Google Scholar

Marks, Gary, Hooghe, Liesbet, Nelson, Moira, and Edwards, Erica (2006), “Party Competition and European Integration in the East and West: Different Structure, Same Causality,” Comparative Political Studies, vol. 39, no. 2: 155–75.Google Scholar

Martín, Ana M., and Kaplan, Martin F. (2006), “Psychological Perspectives on Spanish and Russian Juries,” in Kaplan, Martin F. and Martín, Ana M., eds., Understanding World Jury Systems Through Social Psychological Research. New York and Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Masuyama, Mikitaka (2000), “Is the Japanese Diet Consensual?” Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 6, no. 4: 9–28.Google Scholar

Masuyama, Mikitaka (2003), Gikai Seidoto Nihon Seiji [Agenda Power in the Japanese Diet]. Tokyo: Bokutakusha.Google Scholar

Masuyama, Mikitaka (2004), “Ripponi Okeru Jikanto Eikyoryoku [Time and Influence over Legislation],” Leviathan, vol. 35: 160–3.Google Scholar

Masuyama, Mikitaka (2006), “Ripponi Okeru Henkan vs. Taido Hyomei – Kokkai Shingito Futai Ketsugi [Legislative Gains versus Position Taking: How the Diet Makes Supplementary Resolutions],” Leviathan, vol. 38: 131–53.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Mitsutoyo (2013), “Presidential Strength and Party Leadership in Taiwan,” in Kasuya, Yuko, ed., Presidents, Assemblies, and Policy-Making in Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Mitsutoyo (2014a), “Kunosuru Yoto: Taiwan no Handaitoryosei to Chugoku Kokuminto [Ruling Party in Distress: Semi-Presidentialism in Taiwan and the KMT],” Chugoku Bunka Kenkyu, vol. 27: 1–18.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Mitsutoyo (2014b), “Taiwannno Han-Daitoryosei ni okeru Seisaku Kettei [Policymaking under Taiwan's Semi-Presidential System],” Toyo Bunka, vol. 94: 29–60.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Shunta, and Matsuo, Akitaka (2010), “Kokkai Giinwa Naze Iinkaide Hatsugen Surunoka? [Why Japan's Lower House Members Speak in Committes?],” Senkyo Kenkyu, no. 26-2: 84–103.Google Scholar

McCubbins, Mathew D., and Schwartz, Thomas (1984), “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 28, no. 1: 165–79.Google Scholar

McGuire, Kevin T., and Caldeira, Gregory A. (1993), “Lawyers, Organized Interests, and the Law of Obscenity: Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court,” American Political Science Review, vol. 87, no. 3: 717–26.Google Scholar

Meguid, Bonnie (2005), “Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success,” American Political Science Review, vol. 99, no. 3: 347–59.Google Scholar

Mendelberg, Tali (2002), “The Deliberative Citizen: Theory and Evidence,” in Carpini, MX Delli, Huddy, Leonie, and Shapiro, Robert, eds., Research in Micropolitics: Political Decisionmaking, Deliberation and Participation, vol. 6, no. 1: 151–93. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Michels, Robert (1911[1999]), Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Min, Young-Sung (2011), “Kokumin Sanyo Saiban Seidono Gaiyoto Seiritsuno Keii [Outline of the Korean Jury System and How it Passed],” in Goto, Akira, ed., Higashi Ajia ni okeru Shiminno Keiji Shiho Sanka [Participation in the Criminal Process in East Asia]. Tokyo: Kokusai Shoin.Google Scholar

Min, Young-Sung (2012), “Kankokuno Kokumin Sanyo Saibanno Genjo to Kadai [The State of Korea Jury Trials and Issues Ahead],” Horitsu Jiho, vol. 84, no. 12: 58–62.Google Scholar

Minshuto, (2003), “Saiban-in Seido Sekkeini Kansuru Kangaekata [Basic Approach for Designing the Saiban-in System],” available at http://archive.dpj.or.jp/news/?num=10611, accessed February 19, 2015.Google Scholar

Mitani, Taichiro (2013), Zoho Seiji Seidoto shiteno Baishinsei [The Jury as a Political Institution, Enlarged and Revised Edition]. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai.Google Scholar

Miyamoto, Yasuaki (2005), “Shiho Seido Kaikakuno Shiteki Kento Josetsu [A Prelude to the Examination of Judicial Reforms in Historical Perspective,” Gendai Hogaku, vol. 10: 59–88.Google Scholar

Miyazawa, Setsuo (2008), “The Politics of Increasing Punitiveness and the Rising Populism in Japanese Criminal Justice Policy,” Punishment & Society, vol. 10, no. 1: 47–77.Google Scholar

Miyazawa, Setsuo (2013), “Senshinkoku ni Okeru Hanzai Hasseiritsuno Jokyoto Nihonno Jokyoheno Kokusaiteki Kanshin [Crime Rates in Industrialized Democracies and the Interest in the Japanese Situation],” Hanzai Shakaigaku Kenkyu, vol. 38: 7–35.Google Scholar

Mizuno, Kunio (1999), “Shiho Seido Kaikaku Shingikaiwa Donoyouni Setsuritsu Saretaka [How the Justice System Reform Council was Established],” Gekkan Shiho Kaikaku, vol. 1, no. 1: 53–61.Google Scholar

Moriya, Katsuhiko (2015), “Hoshikkomaeni Jisshi sareta Hoso Sansha Shusaino Mogi Saiban [Mock Trials Sponsored by the Courts, Prosecutors, and the Bar Association Before the Law Came Into Effect],” in Mishima, Satoshi, ed., Saiban-in Saibanno Hyogi Dezain [The Design of the Deliberation Scheme in Saiban-in Trials]. Tokyo: Nihon Hyoronsha.Google Scholar

Moscovici, Serge (1985), “Social Influence and Conformity,” in Lindzey, Gardner and Aronson, Elliot, eds., Handbook of Social Psychology (3rd Edition), Vol. 2. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Muramatsu, Michio (1981), Sengo Nihonno Kanryosei [The Postwar Japanese Bureaucracy]. Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Shimposha.Google Scholar

Mutz, Diana C. (2002), “The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 46, no. 4: 838–55.Google Scholar

National Diet Library (n.d.), “Kokkai Gijiroku Kensaku System [Search Engine for Japanese Parliamentary Minutes],” available at http://kokkai.ndl.go.jp/, accessed June 27, 2017.Google Scholar

Neumayer, Eric (2003), “Are Left-Wing Party Strength and Corporatism Good for the Environment? Evidence from Panel Analysis of Air Pollution in OECD Countries,” Ecological Economics, vol. 45, no. 2: 203–20.Google Scholar

Nishino, Kiichi (2009), “Nihonkoku Kenpo to Baishinsei Sairon [The Japanese Constitution and the Jury System: A Reprise],” Hosei Riron, vol. 41, no. 2: 1–13.Google Scholar

O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe C. (1986), Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Ogura, Yoshihisa (2013), “Saiban-in Seidono Tanjo (2) [The Birth of the Saiban-in System, Part 2],” Kansai Daigaku Hogaku Ronshu, vol. 62, no. 6: 2472–505.Google Scholar

Okayama, Hiroshi (2012), “Senmonsei Kenkyuno Saikosei [Reconsidering Studies of Political Expertise],” in Uchiyama, Yu, Ito, Takeshi, and Okayama, Hiroshi, eds., Senmonseino Seijigaku [The Politics of Expertise]. Kyoto: Minerva Shobo.Google Scholar

Okimoto, Daniel I. (1989), Between MITI and the Market: Japanese Industrial Policy for High Technology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Okumura, Makito (2009), “Daikan Minkokuno Gikai Seido [Legislative Institutions in the Republic of Korea],” Refarensu, vol. 59, no. 8: 97–125.Google Scholar

Onishi, Yutaka (2004), “Kankokuni okeru Ideology Seijino Fukkatsu [The Revival of Ideological Politics in Korea],” Kokusai Mondai, vol. 535: 17–30.Google Scholar

Onishi, Yutaka (2014), Senshinkoku Kankokuno Yuutsu [Challenges Facing South Korea as a Developed Country]. Tokyo: Chuo Koron Shinsha.Google Scholar

Oppermann, Kai, and Brummer, Klaus (2014), “Patterns of Junior Partner Influence on the Foreign Policy of Coalition Governments,” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 16, no. 4: 555–71.Google Scholar

Oppler, Alfred C. (1976), Legal Reform in Occupied Japan: A Participant Looks Back. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ota, Shozo (2015), “Bengoshi kara Mita Keiji Shihoto Saibanin Seido (1): Gaikan [Criminal Justice and the Saiban-in System from the Perspective of Defense Lawyers, Part 1: Overview],” in Matsumura, Yoshiyuki, Kinoshita, Manako, and Ota, Shozo, eds., Nihonjin kara Mita Saiban-in Seido [The Lay Judge System as Seen by the Japanese People]. Tokyo: Keiso Shobo.Google Scholar

Park, Hyunjun (2014), Kankokugata Law School no Tanjo [The Birth of Korean-Style Law Schools]. Okayama: Daigaku Kyoiku Shuppan.Google Scholar

Park, Ryan Y. (2010), “The Globalizing Jury Trial: Lessons and Insights from Korea,” American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 58, no. 3: 525–82.Google Scholar

Pekkanen, Robert (2006), Japan's Dual Civil Society: Members without Advocates. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Perry, H.W. (1991), Deciding to Decide: Agenda-Setting in the United States Supreme Court. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul (2004), Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Poguntke, Thomas (2002), “Green Parties in National Governments: From Protest to Acquiescence?” Environmental Politics, vol. 11, no. 1: 133–45.Google Scholar

Popova, Maria (2010), “Political Competition as an Obstacle to Judicial Independence: Evidence from Russia and Ukraine,” Comparative Political Studies, vol. 43, no. 10: 1202–229.Google Scholar

Popova, Maria (2012), Politicized Justice in Emerging Democracies: A Study of Courts in Russia and Ukraine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pratt, John (2007), Penal Populism. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Price, Vincent (2009), “Citizens Deliberating Online: Theory and Some Evidence,” in Davies, Todd and Gangadharan, Seeta Pena, eds., Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam (2009), “Conquered or Granted? A History of Suffrage Extensions,” British Journal of Political Science, vol. 39, no. 2: 291–321.Google Scholar

Ramnath, Kalyani (2013), “The Colonial Difference between Law and Fact: Notes on the Criminal Jury in India,” The Indian Economic and Social History Review, vol. 50, no. 3: 341–63.Google Scholar

Ramseyer, J. Mark (2001), “Why Are Japanese Judges So Conservative in Politically Charged Cases?” American Political Science Review, vol. 95, no. 2: 331–44.Google Scholar

Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Rosenbluth, Frances M. (1993), Japan's Political Marketplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rich, Timothy S. (2014), “Party Voting Cohesion in Mixed Member Legislative Systems: Evidence from Korea and Taiwan,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 1: 113–35.Google Scholar

Rigger, Shelley (2011), “The Politics of Constitutional Reform in Taiwan,” in Ash, Robert, Garver, John W., and Prime, Peneleope B., eds., Taiwan's Democracy: Economic and Political Challenges. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Robbennolt, Jennifer K. (2005), “Evaluating Juries by Comparison to Judges: A Benchmark for Judging?” Florida State University Law Review, vol. 32, no. 2: 469–509.Google Scholar

Rogers, James R. (2001), “Information and Judicial Review: A Signaling Game of Legislative–Judicial Interaction,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 45, no. 1: 84–99.Google Scholar

Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Stephens, Evelyne Huber, and Stephens, John D. (1992), Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Saiko Saibansho (n.d.), “Kensatsu Shinsakaino Juri Kensu, Giketsu Kensuto [Number of Cases Accepted and Processed by the Prosecutorial Review Commission],” available at www.courts.go.jp/vcms_lf/kensintoukeiH27.pdf, accessed March 28, 2016.Google Scholar

Saiko Saibansho (2015), “Saiban'into Keikenshani Taisuru Anketo Chosa Kekka Hokokusho (Heisei 26-nendo) [Results of Surveys of Former Saiban-in, FY2014],” available www.saibanin.courts.go.jp/vcms_lf/26-a-1.pdf, accessed July 6, 2017.Google Scholar

Saiko Saibansho (2016), “Saiban-in Seidoni tsuite (Saiban-in Shiko∼Heisei 28nen 10-gatsumatsu Sokuho [On the Saiban-in System (From Introduction of the System to October 31, 2016)],” available at www.saibanin.courts.go.jp/vcms_lf/h28_10_saibaninsokuhou.pdf, accessed December 23, 2016.Google Scholar

Saiko Saibansho Jimu Sokyoku (2012[c]), “Saiban-in Saiban Jisshi Jokyono Kensho Hokokusho [Report on the Implementation of Saiban-in Trials],”availableatwww.saibanin.courts.go.jp/vcms_lf/hyousi_honbun.pdf, accessed February 2, 2016.Google Scholar

Saiko Saibansho Jimu Sokyoku (various years[a]), “Saiban-in Saibanno Jisshi Jokyotoni Kansuru Shiryo [Source on the Implementation of the Saiban-in Trials],” available at www.saibanin.courts.go.jp/topics/09_12_05-10jissi_jyoukyou.html, accessed February 2, 2016.Google Scholar

Saiko Saibansho Jimu Sokyoku (various years[b]), Shiho Tokei Nenpo 2, Keijihen [Annual Report of Judicial Statistics. 2, Criminal Cases]. Tokyo: Saiko Saibansho Jimu Sokyoku.Google Scholar

Saiko Saibansho Jimu Sokyoku Keijikyoku (2009), “Mogi Saibannno Seikato Kadai,” Hanrei Times, vol. 60, no. 7: 8–52.Google Scholar

Saiko Saibansho Jimu Sokyoku Keijikyoku (various years), “Keiji Jikennno Gaikyo [General Situation of Criminal Cases],” Hoso Jiho.Google Scholar

Saito, Hiroshi (1999), “Shiho Seido Kaikaku [Judicial System Reform],” Gekkan Shiho Kaikaku, vol. 1, no. 1: 47–52.Google Scholar

Salamon, Lester M., Sokolowski, Wojciech, and Associates (2004), Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector, Volume Two. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar

Samuels, Richard J. (1987), The Business of the Japanese State: Energy Markets in Comparative and Historical Perspective. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Samuels, David J., and Shugart, Matthew S. (2010), Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sannabe, Atsushi (2014), “Are Hereditary Dietmembers Competent? An Analysis of the Data of the Activities in the House of Representatives,” Waseda Institute for Advanced Study Working Paper No. 2014-003, available at http://dspace.wul.waseda.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2065/44486/1/DiscussionPaper_2014_003_Sannabe.pdf, accessed February 12, 2015.Google Scholar

Sato, Koji (1981), Kenpo [Constitutional Law]. Tokyo: Seirin Shoin Shinsha.Google Scholar

Sato, Koji, and Aoyama, Yoshimitsu (2001), “Tokubetsu Taidan Shiho Seido Kaikaku Shingikaiwo Furikaeru [Special Discussion: Looking Back on the Debates in the Justice System Reform Council],” Juristo, vol. 1208: 10–24.Google Scholar

Scarrow, Susan E. (2003), “Making Elections More Direct? Reducing the Role of Parties in Elections,” in Cain, Bruce E., Dalton, Russell J., and Scarrow, Susan E., eds., Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schmitter, Philippe C. (1974), “Still the Century of Corporatism?” The Review of Politics, vol. 36, no. 1: 85–131.Google Scholar

Schreurs, Miranda A. (2002), Environmental Politics in Japan, Germany, and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schumacher, Gijs, de Vries, Catherine E., and Vis, Barbara (2013), “Why Do Parties Change Positions? Party Organization and Environmental Incentives,” The Journal of Politics, vol. 75, no. 2: 464–77.Google Scholar

Schofer, Evan, and Hironaka, Ann (2005), “The Effects of World Society on Environmental Protection Outcomes,” Social Forces, vol. 84, no. 1: 25–47.Google Scholar

Schofer, Evan, and Meyer, John W. (2005), “The Worldwide Expansion of Higher Education in the Twentieth Century,” American Sociological Review, vol. 70, no. 6: 898–920.Google Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. (1993), The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. (2002), The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sheng, Shing-Yuan (2009), “The Dynamic Triangles among Constituencies, Parties, and Legislators: A Comparison Before and After the Reform of Electoral System,” Paper Presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar

Sheyn, Elizabeth R. (2010), “A Foothold for Real Democracy in Eastern Europe: How Instituting Jury Trials in Ukraine Can Bring about Meaningful Governmental and Juridical Reforms and Can Help Spread These Reforms Across Eastern Europe,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 43, no. 3, 649–700.Google Scholar

Shin, Dong Woon (2012), “Kankokuni okeru Kokumin Sanyo Saibanno Aratana Tenkai [New Developments in the Korean Jury System],” Keijiho Journal, no. 32: 102–11.Google Scholar

Shin, Dong Woon (2014), “Kankoku [South Korea],” Kanagawa Daigaku Hogaku Kenkyusho Kenkyushoho, vol. 32: 89–108.Google Scholar

Shiomi, Toshitaka (1975), “Nihonno Shiho Kaikaku [Judicial Reform in Japan],” in Tokyo Daigaku Shakai Kagaku Kenkyusho, ed., Sengo Kaikaku 4: Shiho Kaikaku [Postwar Reforms, vol. 4: Judicial Reforms]. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai.Google Scholar

Shiroshita, Yuji (2011), “Saiban-in Saibanni okeru Ryokeino Dokoto Kadai [Trends in Saiban-in Trial Sentencing Patterns and Issues for the Future],” Hanzaito Hiko, vol. 170: 60–85.Google Scholar

Shiroshita, Yuji (2013), “Saiban-in Saiban ni okeru Ryokei Handan [Sentencing under the Saiban-in System],” in Shiratori, Yuji, ed., Keiji Sibanni okeru Shinrigaku Shinrikanteino Kanosei [Progress in Psychology and Psychological Expertise in Criminal Court]. Tokyo: Nihon Hyoronsha, pp. 215–48.Google Scholar

Shishido, Kuniaki, and Iwai, Noriko (2010), “JGSS Ruiseki Detani Miru Nihonjinno Ishikito Kodono Henka [Trends of Japanese Values and Behavioral Patterns Based on JGSS Cumulative Data 2000–2008],” JGSS Research Series Monograph, available at http://jgss.daishodai.ac.jp/research/monographs/jgssm10/jgssm10_01.pdf, accessed February 10, 2014.Google Scholar

Shogan, Colleen J. (2007), “Anti-Intellectualism in the Modern Presidency: A Republican Populism,” Perspectives on Politics, vol. 5, no. 2: 295–303.Google Scholar

Shugart, Matthew Soberg (2005), “Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive and Mixed Authority Patterns,” French Politics, vol. 3, no. 3: 323–51.Google Scholar

Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and Carey, John M. (1992), Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Simmons, Beth A., Dobbin, Frank, and Garrett, Geoffrey (2006), “Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism,” International Organization, vol. 60, no. 4: 781–810.Google Scholar

Songer, Donald R., Segal, Jeffrey A., and Cameron, Charles M. (1994), “The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 38, no. 3: 673–96.Google Scholar

Spoon, Jae-Jae, Hobolt, Sara B., and de Vries, Catherine E. (2014), “Going Green: Explaining Issue Competition on the Environment,” European Journal of Political Research, vol. 53, no. 2: 363–80.Google Scholar

Steinberg, David I., and Shin, Myung (2006), “Tensions in South Korean Political Parties in Transitions: From Entourage to Ideology?” Asian Survey, vol. 46, no. 4: 517–37.Google Scholar

Stephenson, Matthew C. (2003), “‘When the Devil Turns…’: The Political Foundations of Independent Judicial Review,” The Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 32, no. 1: 59–89.Google Scholar

Strodbeck, Fred L., James, Rita M., and Hawkins, Charles (1957), “Social Status in Jury Deliberations,” American Sociological Review, vol. 22, no. 6: 713–19.Google Scholar

Sui, Cindy (2010), “Taiwan Judges on Corruption Charges,” BBC News, November 8, available at www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-11711199, accessed June 7, 2015.Google Scholar

Suzuki, Ken (2004), “Taiwan no Shiho Seido Kaikaku: Nihon eno Shisa [Judicial Reforms in Taiwan: Implications for Japan],” Hogaku Seminar, vol. 599: 64–7.Google Scholar

Symons, Beverly, and Cahill, Rowan (2005), A Turbulent Decade: Social Protest Movements and the Labour Movement, 1965–1975. Sydney: Sydney Branch, Australian Society for the Study of Labour History.Google Scholar

Taiwan Jury Association (2014), Pei shen tuan mei guo xian ti yan [A Fresh Experience of the US Jury System]. Taipei: Mi Le Culture Press.Google Scholar

Taiwan Indicators Survey Research (n.d.), available at www.tisr.com.tw/?p=5452#more-5452, accessed July 7, 2015.Google Scholar

Takamori, Nobuhiro (2015), “Saiban-in Saibanno Jisshi Jokyo ni Tsuite [On the Implementation of the Saiban-in Trials],” Hanzaito Hiko, no. 179: 139–60.Google Scholar

Takeda, Masahiro (2014), “Kensatsuwa Taisho Jikenwo Shinchoni Kiso [Prosecution Carefully Selecting Which Cases to Indict],” Journalism, vol. 292: 136–43.Google Scholar

Tani, Katsuhiro (2002), “Shiho Seido Kaikaku Shingikaino Seiji Katei [Political Process in the Judicial Reform Council],” Hoshakaigaku, vol. 57: 153–69.Google Scholar

Tani, Katsuhiro (2004), “Saiban-in Seidono Rippo Kateino Kensho [Investigating the Legislative Process of the Saiban-in System],” Meijo Hogaku, vol. 54, no. 1–2: 355–414.Google Scholar

Taniguchi, Naoko, and Winkler, Christian (2015), “Sekaino Nakano Nihonno Seito: Seito Koyaku Coding ni yoru Kokusai Hikaku [Japanese Political Parties in the World: An International Comparison Based on Party Manifesto Codings,” Paper Presented at the Japan Electoral Studies Association, Kumamoto, Japan.Google Scholar

Tanioka, Ichiro (2007), “Hanko Hikono Shitsuto Ryowo Sokuteisuru Kijun Zukurini Mukete [Guideline for Measuring Quality and Quantity of Crime & Delinquency],” Hanzai Shakaigaku Kenkyu, vol. 32: 76–86.Google Scholar

Thaman, Stephen C. (1995), “The Resurrection of Trial by Jury in Russia,” Stanford Journal of International Law, vol. 31, no. 1: 61–274.Google Scholar

Thaman, Stephen C. (1997), “Spain Returns to Trial by Jury,” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, vol. 21: 241–537.Google Scholar

Thaman, Stephen C. (1999), “Europe's New Jury Systems: The Cases of Spain and Russia,” Law and Contemporary Problems, vol. 62, no. 2: 233–59.Google Scholar

Thaman, Stephen C. (2002), “Latin America's First Modern System of Lay Participation: The Reform of Inquisitorial Justice in Venezuela,” in Donatsch, Andreas, Foster, Marc, and Schwarzenegger, Cristian, eds., Strafrecht, Strafprozessrecht Und Menschenrechte. Festschrift Für Stefan Trechsel. Zurich: Schulthess.Google Scholar

Thaman, Stephen C. (2007), “The Nullification of the Russian Jury: Lessons for Jury-Inspired Reform in Eurasia and beyond,” Cornell International Law Journal, vol. 40, no. 2: 355–428.Google Scholar

Thies, Michael F., and Yanai, Yuki (2014), “Bicameralism vs. Parliamentarism: Lessons from Japan's Twisted Diet,” Senkyo Kenkyu, vol. 30, no. 2: 60–74.Google Scholar

Thompson, Dennis F. (2008), “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science”. Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 11: 497–520.Google Scholar

Tilly, Charles C. (1997), “The Top-Down and Bottom-Up Construction of Democracy,” in Etzioni-Halevy, Eva, ed., Classes and Elites in Democracy and Democratization. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar

Tocqueville, Alexis de (1840/2000), Democracy in America. Translated by Mansfield, Harvey C. and Winthrop, Delba. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Tokyo Bar Association, ed. (1992), Baishin Saiban [Jury Trials]. Tokyo: Gyosei.Google Scholar

Toshitani, Nobuyoshi (1975), “Sengo Kaikakuto Kokuminno Shiho Sanka [Postwar Reforms and Popular Participation in the Judicial System],” in Tokyo Daigaku Shakai Kagaku Kenkyusho, ed., Sengo Kaikaku 4: Shiho Kaikaku [Postwar Reforms, vol. 4: Judicial Reforms]. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai.Google Scholar

Toshitani, Nobuyoshi (1984), “Nihonno Baishinho [The Prewar Japanese Jury Law],” Jiyuto Seigi, vol. 35, no. 13: 4–12.Google Scholar

Traest, Philip (2001), “The Jury in Belgium,” Revue Internationale de Droit Pénal, vol. 72, no. 1: 27–50.Google Scholar

Tsai, Yun-Chu (2012), “Legislatives in Taiwan: New Electoral Rules, New Representative Roles, and Experienced Politicians,” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar

Tsai, Ing-wen (2015), “VOTE 2016: Tsai Ing-wen's Judicial Reform Platform,” available at http://thinking-taiwan.com/vote-2016-tsai-ing-wens-judicial-reform-platform/, accessed March 20, 2016.Google Scholar

Tsuchiya, Yoshiaki (2005), Shiminno Shihowa Jitsugen Shitaka [Did A Citizen-Centric Judicial System Come About?]. Tokyo: Kadensha.Google Scholar

Tsuji, Yuki (2012), Kazoku Shugiteki Fukushi Regimeno Saihento Gender Seiji [Realignment of the Familialist Welfare Regime and Gender Politics]. Kyoto: Minerva Shobo.Google Scholar

Tsuji, Hironori (2015), Saiban-in-ho/Keiji Soshoho [Act on Criminal Trials with Participation of Saiban-in/Code of Criminal Procedure]. Tokyo: Shoji Homu.Google Scholar

Turner, Ralph V. (1968), “The Origins of the Medieval English Jury: Frankish, English, or Scandinavian?” The Journal of British Studies, vol. 7, no. 2: 1–10.Google Scholar

Ueno, Nobuko (1998), “Kyutenpo de Susumu Jiminto Shiho Seido Tokubetsu Chosakaino ‘Shiho Kaikaku’ Teigen [LDP Special Research Commission on the Justice System's Proposals for ‘Judicial Reform’: Hastily Put Together],” Ho to Minshushugi, vol. 326: 55–7.Google Scholar

Umakoshi, Toru (2010), Kankoku Daigaku Kaikakuno Dainamizumu [The Dynamics of Korean University System Reform]. Tokyo: Yushindo.Google Scholar

United States Courts (n.d.), “New Public Law Affects Jury Selection and Service,” available at www.uscourts.gov/News/TheThirdBranch/08-12-01/New_Public_Law_Affects_Jury_Selection_and_Service.aspx, accessed January 28, 2015.Google Scholar

Upham, Frank K. (1987), Law and Social Change in Postwar Japan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Vanberg, Georg (2005), The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vanoverbeke, Dmitri (2015), Juries in the Japanese Legal System: The Continuing Struggle for Citizen Participation and Democracy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Vidmar, Neil (2000), “The Jury Elsewhere in the World,” in Vidmar, Neil, ed., World Jury Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vidmar, Neil, and Wolfe, Matthew W. (2009), “Punitive Damages,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, vol. 5: 179–99.Google Scholar

Volkens, Andrea (2007), “Strengths and Weaknesses of Approaches to Measuring Policy Positions of Parties,” Electoral Studies, vol. 26, no. 1: 108–20.Google Scholar

Wade, Robert (1990), Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Wang, Jaw-Perng (2006), “Taiwan Keiji Shiho Kaikakuno Seiko [The Success of Criminal Justice Reform in Taiwan],” Meijo Hogaku, vol. 55, no. 4: 1–34.Google Scholar

Wang, Jaw-Perng (2011), “The Evolution and Revolution of Taiwan's Criminal Justice,” Taiwan in Comparative Perspective, vol. 3: 8–29.Google Scholar

Wang, Zhuoyu, and Fukurai, Hiroshi (2010), “Popular Legal Participation in China and Japan,” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, vol. 38, no. 4: 236–60.Google Scholar

Watson, Alan (1974), Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. Athens and London: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar

Weber, Ingram (2009), “The New Japanese Jury System: Empowering the Public, Preservation Continental Justice,” East Asia Law Review, vol. 4, no. 1: 125–76.Google Scholar

Wilson, Matthew J., Hiroshi, Fukurai, and Takashi, Maruta (2015), Japan and Civil Jury Trials: The Convergence of Forces. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Woo-Cumings, Meredith, ed. (1999), The Developmental State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Wuthnow, Robert (1994), Sharing the Journey: Support Groups and America's New Quest for Community. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Yamamoto, Satoshi (2015), “Saiban-in Saibanno Jisshi Jokyo Bunseki karamiru Shiminno Seigikan [Japanese Citizens' Sense of Justice as Seen in the Analysis of the Implementation of the Saiban-in Trials],” NCCD Japan, vol. 50: 61–87.Google Scholar

Yamazaki, Ushio (2001), “Shiho Seido Kaikakuwo Furikaette [Looking Back on the Judicial Reforms],” Shiho Hoseibu Kiho, vol. 108: 1–3.Google Scholar

Yanase, Noboru (2007), “Saiban-in Hono Rippo Katei (1) [Legislating the Saiban-in Law (Part 1)],” Shinshu Daigaku Hogaku Ronshu, vol. 8: 99–140.Google Scholar

Yanase, Noboru (2008), “Saiban-in Hono Rippo Katei (3) [Legislating the Saiban-in Law (Part 3)],” Shinshu Daigaku Hogaku Ronshu, vol. 10: 119–64.Google Scholar

Yasuoka, Okiharu (2009), Seiji Shudono Jidai [The Era of Political Leadership]. Tokyo: Chuo Koron Shinsha.Google Scholar

Yonekura, Tsutomu (2012), “Jijitsu Ninteito Ryokeino Ryomenkara Mieru Jubatsuka Genbastuka Gensho [The Increasing Severity of Punishments from the Perspective of both Factual Determination and Sentencing],” Ho to Minshu Shugi, vol. 474: 63–5.Google Scholar

Yoon, Yong-Taek (2001), “Kankokuni okeru Shiho Seidono Hensento Shiho Kaikakuno Genjo [Changes in the Korean Judicial System and the Current State of Judicial Reforms],” Shakai Taiseito Ho, vol. 2: 2–20.Google Scholar