References
Abramson, Jeffrey (1994), We, the Jury: The Jury System and the Ideal of Democracy. New York: Basic Books.
Adams, James, Clark, Michael, Ezrow, Lawrence, and Glasgow, Garrett (2006), “Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different than Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of West European Parties' Policy Shifts, 1976–1998,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 50, no. 3: 513–29.
Adams, Ralph James Q., and Poirier, Philip P. (1987), Conscription Controversy in Great Britain, 1900–18. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
Agnone, Jon (2007), “Amplifying Public Opinion: The Policy Impact of the US Environmental Movement,” Social Forces, vol. 85, no. 4: 1593–620.
Amsden, Alice (1989), Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Andersen, Jørgen Goul, and Bjørklund, Tor (1990), “Structural Changes and New Cleavages: The Progress Parties in Denmark and Norway,” Acta Sociologica, vol. 33, no. 3: 195–217.
Arrington, Celeste L. (2014), “Leprosy, Legal Mobilization, and the Public Sphere in Japan and South Korea,” Law & Society Review, vol. 48, no. 3: 563–93.
Asaba, Yuki (2009), “Kankokuni okeru Seito Shisutemuno Henyo [The Transformation of the Korean Party System],” Yamaguchi Kenritsu Daigaku Gakujutsu Joho, vol. 2: 16–29.
Asaba, Yuki (2013), “Presidentialism in Korea: A Strong President and a Weak Government,” in Kasuya, Yuko, ed., Presidents, Assemblies, and Policy-Making in Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Asaba, Yuki, Onishi, Yutaka, and Haruki, Ikumi (2010), “Kankokuni okeru Senkyo Saikuru Fuicchino Seitou Seijieno Eikyo [President Lee Myung-bak's Government Formation in Korea: A Missing Link of Electoral Cycle in Party Politics],” Leviathan, vol. 47: 65–88.
Ashibe, Nobuyoshi (1997), Kenpo (Shinpan) [Constitutional Law (New Edition)]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
Bakker, Ryan, and Hobolt, Sara B. (2013), “Measuring Party Positions,” in Evans, Geoffrey and Graaf, Nan Dirk de, eds., Political Choice Matters: Explaining the Strength of Class and Religious Cleavages in Cross-National Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bakker, Ryan, De Vries, Catherine, Edwards, Erica et al. (2015), “Measuring Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999–2010”. Party Politics, vol. 21, no. 1: 143–52.
Bauhr, Monika, and Grimes, Marcia, “Indignation or Resignation: The Implications of Transparency for Societal Accountability,” Governance, vol. 27, no. 2: 291–320.
Bennett, Mark W. (2010), “Unraveling the Gordian Knot of Implicit Bias in Jury Selection: The Problems of Judge-Dominated Voir Dire, the Failed Promise of Batson, and Proposed Solutions,” Harvard Law & Policy Review, vol. 4, no. 1: 149–71.
Benoit, Kenneth, and Laver, Michael (2006), Party Policy in Modern Democracies. New York and London: Routledge.
Benoit, Kenneth, and Laver, Michael (2007), “Estimating Party Policy Positions: Comparing Expert Surveys and Hand-Coded Content Analysis,” Electoral Studies, vol. 26, no. 1: 90–107.
Beramendi, Pablo, and Rueda, David (2007), “Social Democracy Constrained: Indirect Taxation in Industrialized Democracies,” British Journal of Political Science, vol. 37, no. 4: 619–41.
Bergalli, Roberto (1995), “The Spanish Attempt to Build a Democratic Criminal Justice System,” in Ruggiero, Vincenzo, Ryan, Mick, and Sim, Joe, eds., Western European Penal Systems: A Critical Anatomy. London: Sage.
Bergara, Mario, Richman, Barak, and Spiller, Pablo T. (2003), “Modeling Supreme Court Strategic Decision Making: The Congressional Constraint,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 2: 247–80.
Berger, Joseph, Bernard, B. Cohen, and Zelditch, Morris Jr. (1972), “Status Characteristics and Social Interactions,” American Sociological Review, vol. 37, no. 3: 241–55.
Bergoglio, Maria Inés (2003), “Argentina: The Effects of Democratic Institutionalization,” in Friedman, Lawrence M. and Perez-Perdomo, Rogelio, eds., Legal Culture in the Age of Globalization: Latin America and Latin Europe. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Black, Ryan C., and Owens, Ryan J. (2009), “Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court: The Collision of Policy and Jurisprudence,” Journal of Politics, vol. 71, no. 3: 1062–75.
Bliesener, Thomas (2006), “Lay Judges in the German Criminal Court: Social-Psychological Aspects of the German Criminal Justice System,” in Kaplan, Martin F. and Martin, Ana M., eds., Understanding World Jury Systems through Social Psychological Research. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 179–97.
Bloeser, Andrew J., McCurley, Carl, and Mondak, Jeffery J. (2012), “Jury Service as Civic Engagement Determinants of Jury Summons Compliance,” American Politics Research, vol. 40, no. 2: 179–204.
Bloodgood, Elizabeth A., Tremblay-Boire, Joannie, and Prakash, Aseem (2014), “National Styles of NGO Regulation,” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol. 43, no. 4: 716–36.
Bobek, Michal (2015), “Judicial Selection, Lay Participation, and Judicial Culture in the Czech Republic: A Study in a Central European (non) Transformation,” in Turenne, Sophie, ed., Fair Reflection of Society in Judicial Systems: A Comparative Study. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Bohman, James, and Rehg, William (1997), “Introduction,” in Bohman, James and Rehg, William, eds., Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bolleyer, Nicole (2012), “New Party Organization in Western Europe: Of Party Hierarchies, Stratarchies, and Federations,” Party Politics, vol. 18, no. 3: 315–36.
Bouissou, Jean-Marie (2001), “Party Factions and the Politics of Coalition: Japanese Politics under the ‘System of 1955’,” Electoral Studies, vol. 20, no. 4: 581–602.
Bowler, Shaun, Esterling, Kevin, and Holmes, Dallas (2014), “GOTJ: Get Out the Juror,” Political Behavior, vol. 36, no. 3: 515–33.
Bräuninger, Thomas, and König, Thomas (1999), “The Checks and Balances of Party Federalism: German Federal Government in a Divided Legislature”. European Journal of Political Research, vol. 36, no. 2: 207–34.
Brown, Rupert (2000), Group Processes: Dynamics within and between Groups. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Budge, Ian (2000), “Expert Judgements of Party Policy Positions: Uses and Limitations in Political Research,” European Journal of Political Research, vol. 37, no. 1: 103–13.
Budge, Ian, Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith, and Tanenbaum, Eric (2001), Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burke, Edmund (2008), The Evils of Revolution. London: Penguin Books.
Calder, Kent E. (1988), Crisis and Compensation: Public Policy and Political Stability in Japan, 1949–1986. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Calder, Kent E. (1993), Strategic Capitalism: Private Business and Public Purpose in Japanese Industrial Finance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Callander, Stephen, and Hummel, Patrick (2014), “Preemptive Policy Experimentation,” Econometrica, vol. 82, no. 4: 1509–28.
Capoccia, Giovanni, and Ziblatt, Daniel (2010), “The Historical Turn in Democratization Studies: A New Research Agenda for Europe and Beyond,” Comparative Political Studies, vol. 43, no. 8–9: 931–68.
Casper, Gerhard, and Zeisel, Hans (1972), “Lay Judges in the German Criminal Courts,” The Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 1, no. 1: 135–91.
Chambers, Simone (2003), “Deliberative Democratic Theory,” Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 6: 307–26.
Chang, Hsun Chia (2009), “Taiwan ni okeru Shiho Kaikaku ni tsuite [Judicial Reform in Taiwan],” Kanagawa Law Journal, vol. 2: 39–41.
Chen, Yun-Tsai (2012), “Taiwan ni okeru Jinmin Kanshin Shiko Jorei Soan nitsuite [On the Lay Observer Trial System Bill],” Ronkyu Jurisuto, vol. 2: 90–5.
Chen, Weitseng, and Hsu, Jimmy Chiashin (2014), “Horizontal Accountability in a Polarized New Democracy: The Case of Post-Democratization Taiwan,” Australian Journal of Asian Law, vol. 15, no. 2: 1–19.
Chiou, Lian-gong (1998), “Taiwan ni okeru Shiho Kaikakuno Ugoki [Developments in Taiwanese Judicial Reform],” Ho no Shihai, vol. 108: 99–111.
Chiu, Hsuan-ju, and Peng, Chao-fen (2001), “Taiwan ni okuru Hono Juyoto Tenkai [The Acceptance and Development of Law in Taiwan],” Jurisconsultus, vol. 10: 151–66.
Cho, Kuk (2002), “The Unfinished Criminal Procedure Revolution of Post-Democratization South Korea,” Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, vol. 30, no. 3: 377–94.
Cho, Kuk (2008), “The Newly Introduced Criminal Jury Trial in Korea: A Historic Step Towards ‘Criminal Justice by the People’,” Australian Journal of Asian Law, vol. 10, no. 2: 268–89.
Choi, Jong-Sik (2008), “Kankokuni okeru Kokuminno Keiji Saiban Sanyo Seido [The Korean Criminal Jury],” Keiji Bengo, vol. 53: 163–69.
Choi, Jong-Sik (2013a), “Korean Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials: The Present Situation and Problems,” International Journal of Law, Crime, and Justice, vol. 42, no. 2: 83–102.
Choi, Jong-Sik (2013b), “Kankokuni okeru Kokumin Sanyo Keiji Saiban Seidono Saishu Keitai [The Final Form of the Korean Jury System],” Horitsu Jiho, vol. 85, no. 10: 88–94.
Chud, Adam M., and Berman, Michael L. (2000), “Six-Member Juries: Does Size Really Matter?” Tennessee Law Review, vol. 67, no. 3: 743–63.
Clark, Tom S. (2009), “The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 53, no. 4: 971–89.
Coleman, John J. (1999), “Unified Government, Divided Government, and Party Responsiveness,” American Political Science Review, vol. 93, no. 4: 821–35.
Corey, Zachary, and Hans, Valerie P. (2010), “Japan's New Lay Judge System: Deliberative Democracy in Action,” Asia-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, vol. 12, no. 1: 72–94.
Dainow, Russell (1967), “The Civil Law and Common Law: Some Points of Comparison,” American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 15, no. 3: 419–35.
Dalton, Russell J. (2008), “The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems,” Comparative Political Studies, vol. 41, no. 7: 899–920.
Dalton, Russell J. (2009), “Economics, Environmentalism, and Party Alignments: A Note on Partisan Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies,” European Journal of Political Research, vol. 48, no. 2: 161–75.
Dalton, Russell J., Scarrow, Susan E., and Cain, Bruce E. (2003), “New Forms of Democracy? Reform and Transformation of Democratic Institutions,” in Cain, Bruce E., Dalton, Russell J., and Scarrow, Susan E., eds., Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dalton, Russell J., and Tanaka, Aiji (2007), “The Patterns of Party Polarization in East Asia,” Journal of East Asian Studies, vol. 7, no. 2: 203–23.
Dammer, Harry, and Albanese, Jay (2013), Comparative Criminal Justice Systems. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
Dawson, John P. (1960), A History of Lay Judges. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Deguchi, Yuichi (2000), “GHQno Shiho Kaikaku Koso kara Mita Senryouki Ho Keiju [Legal Transplantation During the Occupation Era as Seen from the GHQ's Vision for Judicial Reforms],” Hogaku Seijigaku Kenkyu, no. 44: 351–84.
Deguchi, Yuichi (2001), “GHQ no Shiho Kaikaku Kosoto Kokuminnno Shiho Sanka [The GHQ's Vision for Judicial Reforms and Popular Participation in the Judicial System],” Hogaku Seijigaku Ronkyu, no. 49: 149–81.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., Lomax Cook, Fay, and Jacobs, Lawrence R. (2004), “Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature,” Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 7: 315–44.
Devine, Dennis J., Laura, D. Clayton, Dunford, Benjamin B., Seying, Rasmy, and Pryce, Jennifer (2001), “Jury Decision Making: 45 years of Empirical Research on Deliberating Groups,” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, vol. 7, no. 3: 622–727.
De Winter, Lieven (1998), “Conclusion: Toward a Comparative Analysis,” in De Winter, Lieven and Türsan, Huri, eds., Regionalist Parties in Western Europe. London and New York: Routledge.
Diamond, Sheri Seidman (1993), “What Jurors Think,” in Litan, Robert E., ed., Verdict: Assessing the Civil Jury System. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Diesen, Christian (2001), “Lay Judges in Sweden: A Short Introduction,” Revue Internationale de Droite Pénal, vol. 72, no. 1–2: 313–15.
Dobrovolskaia, Anna (2016), The Development of Jury Service in Japan: A Square Block in a Round Hole? Abingdon: Routledge.
Doheny, Shane, and O'Neill, Claire (2010), “Becoming Deliberative Citizens: The Moral Learning Process of the Citizen Juror,” Political Studies, vol. 58, no. 4: 630–48.
Donovan, James M. (2010), Juries and the Transformation of Criminal Justice in France in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Dryzek, John S. (2000), Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Duch, Raymond M., and Taylor, Michaell A. (1993), “Postmaterialism and the Economic Condition,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 37, no. 3: 747–79.
Eda, Satsuki (2000), “Shiminga Shuyakuno Shihoe [Towards a Justice System in which the Citizens are the Protagonists],” available at www.eda-jp.com/dpj/shihou.html, accessed February 19, 2015. Eisenberg, Theodore, Hannaford-Agor, Paula. L., Hans, Valerie P. et al. (2005), “Judge-Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: A Partial Replication of Kalven and Zeisel's The American Jury”. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol. 2, no. 1: 171–207.
Eisenberg, Theodore, Hannaford-Agor, Paula L., Heise, Michael et al. (2006), “Juries, Judges, and Punitive Damages: Empirical Analyses Using the Civil Justice Survey of State Courts 1992, 1996, and 2001 Data,” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol. 3, no. 2: 263–95.
Eisenberg, Theodore, LaFountain, Neil, Ostrom, Brian, and Rottman, David (2002), “Juries, Judges, and Punitive Damages: An Empirical Study,” Cornell Law Review, vol. 87, no. 3: 743–82.
Eisenberg, Thomas, Heise, Michael, Waters, Nicole L., and Wells, Martin T. (2010), “The Decision to Award Punitive Damages: An Empirical Study,” Journal of Legal Analysis, vol. 2, no. 2: 577–620.
Encarnación, Omar G. (2008), Spanish Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn (1999), Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policymaking under Separate Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ertman, Thomas (2010), “The Great Reform Act of 1832 and British Democratization,” Comparative Political Studies, vol. 43, no. 8–9: 1000–22.
Feld, Lars P., and Voigt, Stefan (2003), “Economic Growth and Judicial Independence: Cross-Country Evidence Using a New Set of Indicators,” European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 19, no. 3: 497–527.
Fell, Dafydd (2005), Party Politics in Taiwan: Party Change and the Democratic Evolution of Taiwan, 1991–2004. Abingdon: Routledge.
Fell, Dafydd (2007), “Partisan Issue Competition in Contemporary Taiwan: Is Taiwan's Democracy Dead?” Chinese History and Society, vol. 32: 23–39.
Fell, Dafydd (2011), “The Polarization of Taiwan's Party Competition in the DPP Era,” in Ash, Robert and Prime, Penny, eds., Taiwan's Democracy and Future: Economic and Political Challenges. London: Routledge.
Fell, Dafydd (2013), “Impact of Candidate Selection Systems on Election Results: Evidence from Taiwan before and after the Change in Electoral Systems,” The China Quarterly, vol. 213: 152–71.
Finkel, Jodi (2005), “Judicial Reform as Insurance Policy: Mexico in the 1990s,” Latin American Politics & Society, vol. 47, no. 1: 87–113.
Finkel, Jodi (2008), Judicial Reform as Insurance: Argentina, Peru, and Mexico in the 1990s Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Fischer, Frank (2000), Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Fishkin, James S. (2009), When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Flynn, George Q. (2002), Conscription and Democracy: The Draft in France, Great Britain, and the United States. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Foley, Michael S. (2003), Confronting the War Machine: Draft Resistance during the Vietnam War. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press.
Foote, Daniel H. (2014), “Citizen Participation: Appraising the Saiban’ in System,” Michigan State International Law Review, vol. 22, no. 3: 755–75.
Franzmann, Simon, and Kaiser, André (2006), “Locating Political Parties in Policy Space: A Re-Analysis of Party Manifesto Data,” Party Politics, vol. 12, no. 2: 163–88.
Fujimura, Naofumi (2013), “A New Day, A New Way: The Post Allocation of the Democratic Party of Japan under the Mixed-Member Majoritarian System,” Japan Forum, vol. 25, no. 2: 259–92.
Fukumoto, Kentaro (2000), Nihonno Kokkai Seiji: Zen Seifu Rippono Bunseki [Legislative Politics in Japan: An Analysis of All Legislation]. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai.
Fukumoto, Kentaro (2004), “Shijo Ronso Shohyo Masuyama Mikitaka cho Gikai Seidoto Nihon Seiji Giji Un'ei no Keiryo Seijigaku wo Megutte [Debating Mikitaka Masuyama's Agenda Power in the Japanese Diet],” Leviathan, vol. 35: 152–9.
Fukurai, Hiroshi (2011), “Japan's Quasi-Jury and Grand Jury Systems as Deliberative Agents of Social Change: De-Colonial Strategies and Deliberative Participatory Democracy,” Chicago-Kent Law Review, vol. 86, no. 2: 789–830.
Fukurai, Hiroshi, Chan, Kay-Wah, and Miyazawa, Setsuo (2010), “The Resurgence of Lay Adjudicatory Systems in East Asia,” Asia-Pacific Law and Policy Journal, vol. 12: i–xi.
Fukurai, Hiroshi, Knudtson, Clark Robert, and Lopez, Susan Irene (2009), “Is Mexico Ready for a Jury Trial?: Comparative Analysis of Lay Justice Systems in Mexico, the United States, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, and Ireland,” Mexican Law Review, vol. 2, no. 1: 3–44.
Fukurai, Hiroshi, and Hans, Valerie P. (2012), “Special Feature: The Future of Lay Adjudication in Korea and Japan,” Yonsei Law Journal, vol. 3, no. 1: 25–35.
Fukushima, Mizuho (2001), “Shiho Seido Kaikaku Shingikai Chukan Hokokuni tsuite [On the Interim Report of the Justice System Reform Council],” Shakai Minshu, vol. 550: 111–13.
Fukuyama, Tatsuo (2002), “Taiwan: Shiho Zenryoikini wataru ‘Kaizo’ [Taiwan: Remaking the Entire Judicial System],” Ajiken World Trend, vol. 77: 12–15.
Furukawa, Teijiro (2004), “Shiho Seido Kaikakuni tsuite [On Judicial Reforms],” Shiho Kaikaku Chosa Shitsuho, vol. 3: 2–24.
Gadbin-George, Geraldine (2012), “Towards a Mutation of the Language of Criminal Trial in French and British Courts? The Influence of the Part Played by Juries on Judges' Discourse,” Comparative Law Review, vol. 3, no. 2: 1–22.
Gastil, John, Black, Laura W., Deess, E. Pierre, and Leighter, Jay (2008), “From Group Member to Democratic Citizen: How Deliberating with Fellow Jurors Reshapes Civic Attitudes,” Human Communication Research, vol. 34, no. 1: 137–69.
Gastil, John, Deess, E. Pierre, and Weiser, Phil (2002), “Civic Awakening in the Jury Room: A Test of the Connection between Jury deliberation and Political Participation,” Journal of Politics, vol. 64, no. 2: 585–95.
Gastil, John, Deess, E. Pierre, Weiser, Philip J., and Simmons, Cindy (2010), The Jury and Democracy: How Jury Deliberation Promotes Civic Engagement and Political Participation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gastil, John, and Weiser, Philip J. (2006), “Jury Service as an Invitation to Citizenship: Assessing the Civil Value of Institutionalized Deliberation,” Policy Studies Journal, vol. 34, no. 4: 605–27.
Gee, Graham (2015), The Politics of Judicial Independence in the UK's Changing Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giles, Micheal W., and Lancaster, Thomas D. (1989), “Political Transition, Social Development, and Legal Mobilization in Spain,” American Political Science Review, vol. 83, no. 3: 817–33.
Ginsburg, Tom (2001), “Dismantling the Developmental State? Administrative Procedure Reform in Japan and Korea,” American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 49, no. 4: 585–625.
Ginsburg, Tom (2003), Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ginsburg, Tom (2010), “The Constitutional Court and the Judicialization of Korean Politics,” in Harding, Andrew and Nicholson, Penelope, eds., New Courts in Asia. Abingdon: Routledge.
Ginsburg, Tom (2012), “Competitive Modernization: The Politics of Legal and State Reform in Northeast Asia,” Presented at the Conference on State and Asia, Leiden, Netherlands, December 2012, available at http://media.leidenuniv.nl/legacy/tom-ginsburg.pdf, accessed March 5, 2015. Glaeser, Edward L., and Shleifer, Andrei (2002), “Legal Origins,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 117, no. 4: 1193–229.
Guinther, John (1998), The Jury in America. New York: Facts on File.
Gunther, Richard, and Montero, José Ramón (2009), The Politics of Spain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis (1996), Democracy and Disagreement: Why Moral Conflict Cannot be Avoided in Politics, and What Should be Done about It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis (2004), Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ha, Tae-Hoon (2010), “Shimin Dantai kara mita Kokumin Sanyo Saiban [The Korean Jury from the Perspective of Civil Society],” Hogaku Seminar, vol. 55, no. 6: 42–5.
Haas, Peter M. (1992), “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination,” International Organization, vol. 46, no. 1: 1–35.
Hall, Peter A., ed. (1989), The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism Across Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hamai, Koichi, and Ellis, Tom (2008), “Genbatsuka: Growing Penal Populism and the Changing Role of Public Prosecutors in Japan?” Hanzai Shakaigaku Kenkyu, vol. 33: 67–92.
Han, In-Sup (2015), “Kankokuno Kokumin Sanyo Saiban (Baishin-in Saiban) [The Jury Trial in South Korea],” Hogaku Seminar, vol. 60, no. 8: 62–8.
Han, Sang Hoon, and Park, Kwangbai (2012), “Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials of Korea: A Statistical Portrait of the First Four Years,” Yonse Law Journal, vol. 3: 55–66.
Hanashi, Yasuhiro (2004), “Kokkai deno Shitsumon Iken Hyomei 16kai (Jimito Giinchu Saita [Posed Sixteen Questions and Comments in the Parliament: The Most Among LDP Dietmembers],” available at www.hanashiyasuhiro.com/3679, accessed July 22, 2015. Hans, Valerie P. (2008), “Jury Systems Around the World,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, vol. 4: 275–97.
Hans, Valerie P., and Germain, Claire M. (2011), “The French Jury at a Crossroads,” Chicago-Kent Law Review, vol. 86: 737–68.
Harada, Kunio (2013), “Saiban-in Saibanni okeru Ryokei Keiko [Trends in Sentencing Patterns Under the Saiban-in Trials],” Keio Hogaku, vol. 27: 161–87.
Harvey, Anna, and Friedman, Barry (2006), “Pulling Punches: Congressional Constraints on the Supreme Court's Constitutional Rulings, 1987–2000,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 4: 533–62.
Helbling, Marc, and Tresch, Anke (2011), “Measuring Party Positions and Issue Salience from Media Coverage: Discussing and Cross-Validating New Indicators,” Electoral Studies, vol. 30, no. 1: 174–83.
Hellmann, Olli (2014), “Party System Institutionalization Without Parties: Evidence from Korea,” Journal of East Asian Studies, vol. 14, no. 1: 53–84.
Helmke, Gretchen (2002), “The Logic of Strategic Defection: Court-Executive Relations in Argentina under Dictatorship and Democracy,” American Political Science Review, vol. 96, no. 2: 291–303.
Helmke, Gretchen (2005), Courts under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Helmke, Gretchen, and Rosenbluth, Frances (2009), “Regimes and the Rule of Law: Judicial Independence in Comparative Perspective,” Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 12: 345–66.
Hendler, Catedra (2005), “Jury Trials in Argentina,” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Las Vegas, NV, available at www.catedrahendler.org/doctrina_in.php?id=31, accessed February 15, 2015. Hendler, Edmundo (2008/9), “Lay Participation in Argentina: Old History, Recent Experience,” Southwestern Journal of International Law, vol. 15, no. 1: 1–30.
Heo, Uk, and Stockton, Hans (2005), “The Impact of Democratic Transition on Elections and Parties in South Korea,” Party Politics, vol. 11, no. 6: 674–88.
Herron, Erik S., and Randazzo, Kirk A. (2003), “The Relationship between Independence and Judicial Review in Post-Communist Courts,” Journal of Politics, vol. 65, no. 2: 422–38.
Hersch, Joni, and Viscusi, W. Kip (2004), “Punitive Damages: How Judges and Juries Perform,” The Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 33, no. 1: 1–36.
Heuer, Larry, and Penrod, Steven (1994), “Trial Complexity: A Field Investigation of Its Meaning and its Effects,” Law and Human Behavior, vol. 18, no. 1: 29–51.
Higuchi, Naoto, Ito, Midori, Tanabe, Shunsuke, and Matsutani, Mitsuru (2009), “Explaining Japan's Lack of Green Parties: A Socio-Milieu Approach,” Paper Presented at the XXI World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Santiago, Chile.
Hirschl, Ran (2002), Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hix, Simon, and Jun, Hae-Won (2009), “Party Behavior in the Parliamentary Arena: The Case of the Korean National Assembly,” Party Politics, vol. 15, no. 6: 667–94.
Ho, Ming-Sho (2005), “Weakened State and Movement: The Paradox of Taiwanese Environmental Politics after the Power Transfer,” Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 14, no. 43: 339–52.
Hoeglinger, Dominic (2016), “The Politicisation of European Integration in Domestic Election Campaigns,” West European Politics, vol. 39, no. 1: 44–63.
Hofferbert, Richard I., and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (1990), “The Policy Impact of Party Programmes and Government Declarations in the Federal Republic of Germany,” European Journal of Political Research, vol. 18, no. 3: 277–304.
Holsti, Ole (1998/9), “A Widening Gap between the U.S. Military and Civilian Society? Some Evidence, 1976–99,” International Security, vol. 23, no. 3: 5–42.
Homusho (various years), Kensatsu Tokei Nenpo [Annual Report of Statistics on Prosecution]. Tokyo: Homu Daijin Kanbo Shiho Hoseichosabu Chosa Tokeika.
Honjo, Takeshi (2003), “Saiban-in no Ryokei Sanka [Participation of Saiban-in in the Sentencing Process],” Hitotsubashi Ronso, vol. 129, no. 1: 22–40.
Hooghe, Liesbet, Marks, Gary, and Wilson, Carole J. (2002), “Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?” Comparative Political Studies, vol. 35, no. 8: 965–89.
Hoover, Dennis R., and Dulk, Kevin R. den (2004), “Christian Conservatives Go to Court: Religion and Legal Mobilization in the United States and Canada,” International Political Science Review, vol. 25, no. 1: 9–34.
Hopkin, Jonathan (1999), Party Formation and Democratic Transition in Spain: The Creation and Collapse of the Union of the Democratic Centre. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Horan, Jacqueline (2005), “Perceptions of the Civil Jury System,” Monash University Law Review, vol. 31, no. 1: 134–51.
Howell, William, Adler, E. Scott, Cameron, Charles, and Riemann, Charles (2000), “Divided Government and the Legislative Productivity of Congress, 1945–94,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 2: 285–312.
Huang, Kuo-Chang, Chen, Kong-Pin, and Lin, Chang-Chin (2010), “Does the Type of Criminal Defense Counsel Affect Case Outcomes? A Natural Experiment in Taiwan,” International Review of Law and Economics, vol. 30, no. 2: 113–27.
Huang, Kuo-Chang, and Lin, Chang-Ching (2013), “Rescuing Confidence in the Judicial System: Introducing Lay Participation in Taiwan,” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol. 10, no. 3: 542–69.
Huber, John, and Inglehart, Ronald (1995), “Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies,” Party Politics, vol. 1, no. 1: 73–111.
Huber, John D., and Shipan, Charles R. (2002), Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huckfeldt, Robert, Johnson, Paul E., and Sprague, John (2004), Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Husa, Jaakko (2004), “Classification of Legal Families Today: Is it Time for a Memorial Hymn?” Revue International de Droit Comparé, vol. 56, no. 1: 11–38.
Iaryczower, Matías, Spiller, Pablo T., and Tommasi, Mariano (2002), “Judicial Independence in Unstable Environments, Argentina 1935–1998,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 46, no. 4: 699–716.
Iaryczower, Matias, Spiller, Pablo T., and Tommasi, Mariano (2006), “Judicial Lobbying: the Politics of Labor Law Constitutional Interpretation,” American Political Science Review, vol. 100, no. 1: 85–97.
Ibusuki, Makoto (2010), “Quo Vadis?: First Year Inspection to Japanese Mixed Jury Trial,” Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, vol. 12, no. 1: 24–58.
Iimuro, Katsuhiko (2000), “Saraba Omakase Shiho [Taking Control of the Judicial Process],” Shiho Kaikaku, vol. 2, no. 2: 53–6.
Imamura, Kaku (2008), Enzai Bengoshi [Defense Lawyers for Wrongful Convictions]. Tokyo: Shumposha.
Inglehart, Ronald (1988), “The Renaissance of Political Culture,” American Political Science Review, vol. 82, no. 4: 1203–30.
Inoguchi, Takashi (1987), “Japan 1960–1980: Party Programmes in Elections,” in Budge, Ian, ed., Ideology, Strategy, and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Inoguchi, Takashi, and Iwai, Tomoaki (1987), “Zoku Giin” no Kenkyu [A Study of “Zoku” Dietmembers]. Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shimbunsha.
Ito, Kazuko (2011), “‘Nejire Kokkai’ ni okeru Kokkai Shingino Shoso [The Various Aspects of Deliberations in the Divided Diet],” Hokudai Hogaku Ronshu, vol. 61, no. 5: 1730–56.
Jackson, John D., and Kovalev, Nikolay P. (2006/7), “Lay Adjudication and Human Rights in Europe,” Columbia Journal of European Law, vol. 13: 83–123.
Janowitz, Morris (1983), The Reconstruction of Patriotism: Education for Civic Consciousness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jennings, M. Kent (1987), “Residues of a Movement: The Aging of the American Protest Generation,” American Political Science Review, vol. 81, no. 2: 367–82.
Jennings, M. Kent (2002), “Generation Units and the Student Protest Movement in the United States: An Intra- and Intergenerational Analysis,” Political Psychology, vol. 23, no. 2: 303–24.
“Jihaku Nerau Koryu, Mitomenu Hoko [A Decline in Rejection of Detentions for the Sake of Inducing Confessions],” Asahi Shimbun, April 21, 2008.
Jeon, Jin Young, and Machidori, Satoshi (2015), “Seitono Ittaiseiha Ikanishite Kakuho Sarerunoka [How is Party Discipline Achieved]?” in Kang, Won-Taek, Asaba, Yuki, and Gyu Go, Seon, eds., Nikkan Seiji Seido Hikaku [Comparing Japanese and Korean Political Institutions]. Tokyo: Keio Daigaku Shuppankai.
Jimeno-Bulnes, Mar (2004), “Lay Participation in Spain: The Jury System,” International Criminal Justice Review, vol. 14: 164–85.
Jimeno-Bulnes, Mar (2007), “A Different Story Line for 12 Angry Men: Verdicts Reached by Majority Rule-The Spanish Perspective,” Chicago-Kent Law Review, vol. 82, no. 2: 759–75.
Jimeno-Bulnes, Mar (2011), “Jury Selection and Jury Trial in Spain: Between Theory and Practice,” Chicago-Kent Law Review, vol. 86, no. 2: 585–612.
Jiyu, Minshuto (1998), “Shiho Seido Tokubetsu Chosakai Houkoku 21-seiki no Shihono Tashikana Shishin [A Solid Framework for the Justice System for the 21st Century: A Report by the Special Research Commission on the Justice System],” Jiyuto Seigi, vol. 49, no. 8: 194–7.
Jiyu, Minshuto (2000), “21-seiki no Shiho no Tashikana Ippo [A Firm Step Forward for the Judicial System in the 21st Century],” Jiyu to Seigi, vol. 51, no. 7: 136–48.
Johnson, Chalmers (1982), MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy: 1925–1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Johnson, David (2002), The Japanese Way of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, David (2008), “Japanese Punishment in Comparative Perspective,” Japanese Journal of Sociological Criminology, vol. 33: 46–66.
Jou, Willy (2011), “How do Citizens in East Asian Democracies Understand Left and Right?” Japanese Journal of Political Science, vol. 12, no. 1: 33–55.
Judicial Yuan (2014), Statute on the Pilot Implementation of the Advisory Jury System in Trial (Draft). Taipei: Judicial Yuan.
Ka, Sangjoon, and Nishino, Junya (2015), “Shissei Chusubuni Kansuru Nikkan Hikaku [Comparing Japan and Korea's Core Executive],” in Kang, Won-Taek, Asaba, Yuki, and Gyu Go, Seon, eds., Nikkan Seiji Seido Hikaku [Comparing Japanese and Korean Political Institutions]. Tokyo: Keio Daigaku Shuppankai.
Kaarbo, Juliet (1996), “Power and Influence in Foreign Policy Decision Making: The Role of Junior Coalition Partners in German and Israeli Foreign Policy,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 4: 501–30.
Kaarbo, Juliet (2008), “Coalition Cabinet Decision Making: Institutional and Psychological Factors,” International Studies Review, vol. 10, no. 1: 57–86.
Kage, Rieko (2015), “Nihonnni okueru Saiban-in Seidono Sosetsu [The Founding of the Saiban-in System in Japan],” in Takahashi, Yuriko, ed., Akauntabiriti Kaikakuno Seijigaku. Tokyo: Yuhikaku.
Kalven, Harry Jr., and Zeisel, Hans (1966), The American Jury. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
Kamikawa, Ryunoshin (2010), Koizumi Kaikakuno Seijigaku [Analyzing Koizumi's Reforms]. Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Shimposha.
Kanda, Hiroki (2014), “Sengo Shuyo Seitono Hensento Kokkainai Seiryokuno Suii [The Postwar Evolution of Major Parties in Japan and Their Pariamentary Seat Shares],” Refarensu, vol. 64, no. 6: 41–64.
Kang, Won-Taek, and Asaba, Yuki (2015), “Bunkatsu Seifuno Nikkan Hikaku [Comparing Divided Government in Japan and South Korea],” in Kang, Won-Taek, Asaba, Yuki, and Go, Seon Gyu, eds., Nikkan Seiji Seido Hikaku [Comparing Japanese and Korean Political Institutions]. Tokyo: Keio Gijuku Daigaku Shuppankai.
Kaplan, Martin F., and Martin, Ana M. (1999), “Effects of Differential Status of Group Members on Process and Outcome of Deliberation,” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, vol. 2, no. 4: 347–64.
Kaplan, Martin F., and Martín, Ana M., eds. (2006), Understanding World Jury Systems Through Social Psychological Research. New York and Hove: Psychology Press.
Kaplan, Martin F., Martín, Ana M., and Hertel, Janine (2014), “Issues and Prospects in European Juries: An Overview,” in Kaplan, Martin F. and Martín, Ana M., eds., Understanding World Jury Systems Through Social Psychological Research. New York and Hove: Psychology Press.
Kasuya, Yuko (2013a), “Introduction,” in Kasuya, Yuko, ed., Presidents, Assemblies, and Policy-Making in Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kasuya, Yuko (2013b), “A Framework for Analysing Presidential-Legislative Relations in Asia,” in Kasuya, Yuko, ed., Presidents, Assemblies, and Policy-Making in Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kato, Junko (2003), Regressive Taxation and the Welfare State: Path Dependence and Policy Diffusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Katzenstein, Peter J. (1985). Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Keizai Doyukai (1994), Gendai Nihonno Byorito Shoho [The Pathologies of Contemporary Japan: Prescriptions]. Tokyo: Keizai Doyukai.
Keizai Doyukai (1997), Gurobarukani Taiosuru Kigyo Hoseino Seibiwo Mezashite [Towards a Corporate Law System that Responds to Globalization]. Tokyo: Keizai Doyukai.
Kelly, Terrence (2004), “Unlocking the Iron Cage: Public Administration in the Deliberative Democratic Theory of Jürgen Habermas,” Administration & Society, vol. 36, no. 1: 38–61.
Kier, Elizabeth (1999), Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine Between the Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kim, Sangjoon, Park, Jaihyun, Park, Kwangbai, and Eom, Jin-Sup (2013), “Judge-Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: The First Three Years of the Korean Jury System,” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol. 10, no. 1: 35–53.
Kim, Wonik (2010), “Does Class Matter? Social Cleavages in South Korea's Electoral Politics in the Era of Neoliberalism,” Review of Political Economy, vol. 22, no. 4: 589–616.
Kimura, Masato (2015), “Muchini Motozku Chobatsu Ishiki? [Misinformed Citizen and Death Penalty],” Takachiho Ronso, vol. 50, no. 2: 23–46.
Kitschelt, Herbert (1994), The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kitschelt, Herbert (2013), Democratic Accountability and Linkages Project. Durham, NC: Duke University.
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter (1995), “Party Positions and Voter Orientations,” in Klingemann, Hans-Dieter and Fuchs, Dieter, eds., Citizens and the State. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 183–205.
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith, Budge, Ian, and McDonald, Michael (2006), Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knill, Christoph, Debus, Marc, and Heichel, Stephan (2010), “Do Parties Matter in Internationalised Policy Areas? The Impact of Political Parties on Environmental Policy Outputs in 18 OECD Countries, 1970–2000,” European Journal of Political Research, vol. 49, no. 3: 301–36.
Knutsen, Oddbjørn (1998), “Expert Judgments on the Left-Right Location of Political Parties: A Longitudinal Study,” West European Politics, vol. 21, no. 2: 63–94.
Koga, Tsuyoshi, Kirimura, Yasue, and Okumura, Makito (2010), “Teikoku Gikai oyobi Kokkaino Rippo Tokei [Statistics on Legislation in the Imperial Diet and the Postwar Diet],” Refarensu, vol. 60, no. 11: 117–55.
Koike, Shintaro (2016), “Ryokei Handanno Arikata [Sentencing],” Keiho Zasshi, vol. 55, no. 2: 346–60.
Kojima, Toru (2015), “Saiban-in Saibanni yoru Ryokeino Henka [Changes in Sentencing since the Introduction of the Saiban-in System],” Chukyo Hogaku, vol. 49, no. 3–4, 169–97.
König, Thomas, Marbach, Moritz, and Osnabrügge, Moritz (2013), “Estimating Party Positions across Countries and Time—A Dynamic Latent Variable Model for Manifesto Data,” Political Analysis, vol. 21, no. 4: 468–91.
“Koryu Seikyu Kyakka Kyuzo [A Steep Increase in Rejected Requests for Detention Warrants]” (2015), Mainichi Shimbun, December 24.
Kovalev, Nikolai (2010), Criminal Justice Reform in Russia, Ukraine, and the Former Republics of the Soviet Union: Trial by Jury and Mixed Courts. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
Kovalev, Nikolai, and Suleymenova, Gulnar (2010), “New Kazakhstani Quasi-Jury System: Challenges, Trends and Reforms,” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, vol. 38, no. 4: 261–78.
Krebs, Ron R. (2006), Fighting for Rights: Military Service and the Politics of Citizenship. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kudo, Mika (2004a), “Kankoku Shiho Kaikaku Iinkaito Nichibenren Chosano Gaiyo [The Korean Reform Committee and Overview of the JFBA Study Team],” Shiho Kaikaku Chosa Shitsuho, vol. 4: 2–13.
Kudo, Mika (2004b), “Kankokuno Shiho Kaikaku kara Manabu [Learning from Korea's Judicial Reforms],” Hogaku Seminar, vol. 49, no. 11: 59–63.
Kutnjak Ivković, Sanja (1999), Lay Participation in Criminal Trials: The Case of Croatia. Lanham, MD: Austin and Winfield Publishers.
Langbein, John H. (1981), “Mixed Court and Jury Court: Could the Continental Alternative Fill the American Need?” Law & Social Inquiry, vol. 6, no. 1: 195–219.
Langer, Máximo (2004), “From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: The Globalization of Plea-Bargaining and the Americanization Thesis in Criminal Procedure,” Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 45, no. 1: 1–64.
Laver, Michael J., and Benoit, Kenneth (2005), “Estimating Party Positions: Japan in Comparative Context,” Japanese Journal of Political Science, vol. 6, no. 2: 187–209.
Laver, Michael J., and Budge, Ian (1992), “Measuring Policy Distances and Modelling Coalition Formation,” in Laver, Michael J. and Budge, Ian, eds., Party Policy and Government Coalitions. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Laver, Michael, and Hunt, W. Ben (1992), Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge.
Leal, David L. (1999), “It's Not Just a Job: Military Service and Latino Political Participation,” Political Behavior, vol. 21, no. 2: 153–74.
Lee, Dong-hee (2011a), “Kankoku Kokumin Sanyo Saibanno Genjo to Kadai (Jou) [The Korean Jury System: Current State and Issues for the Future (Part 1)],” Kikan Keiji Bengo, vol. 67: 182–93.
Lee, Dong-hee (2011b), “Kankoku Kokumin Sanyo Saibanno Genjo to Kadai (Ge) [The Korean Jury System: Current State and Issues for the Future (Part 2)],” Kikan Keiji Bengo, vol. 68: 197–204.
Lee, Eun-Mo (2008), “Kankokuno Kokumin Sanyo Saiban Seidono Naiyoto Mondaiten [An Introduction of the New Civil Participatory Criminal Trials System in Korea],” Nomos, vol. 23: 65–76.
Lee, Jae-Hyup (2009), “Getting Citizens Involved: Civic Participation in Judicial Decision-Making in Korea,” University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review, vol. 4, no. 2: 177–207.
Lee, John Sanghyun (2016), “Transplanting Jury Trials in South Korean Legal Soils: Comparative Analysis with Jury Trials in the United States,” Asian Journal of Criminology, vol. 11, no. 2: 111–33.
Leib, Ethan J. (2007), “A Comparison of Criminal Jury Decision Rules in Democratic Countries,” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, vol. 5, no. 2: 629–44.
Lehmann, Pola, Matthie, Theres, Merz, Nicolas, Regel, Sven, and Werner, Annika (2015), Manifesto Corpus. Version: 2015–5. Berlin: WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
Levi, Margaret (1996), “The Institution of Conscription,” Social Science History, vol. 20, no. 1: 133–67.
Levi, Margaret (1997), Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levine, Dennis J., Clayton, Laura D., Dunford, Benjamin B., Seying, Rasmy, and Pryce, Jennifer (2001), “Jury Decision Making: 45 Years of Empirical Research on Deliberating Groups,” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, vol. 7, no. 3: 622–727.
Linzer, Drew A., and Staton, Jeffrey K. (2015), “A Global Measure of Judicial Independence, 1948–2012,” Journal of Law and Courts, vol. 3, no. 2: 223–56.
Lloyd-Bostock, Sally, and Thomas, Cheryl (1999), “The Decline of the ‘Little Parliament’: Juries and Jury Reform in England and Wales,” Law and Contemporary Problems, vol. 62, no. 2: 7–40.
Luebbert, Gregory M. (1991), Liberalism, Fascism, or Social Democracy: Social Classes and the Political Origins of Regimes in Interwar Europe. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lupu, Noam (2014), “Party Polarization and Mass Partisanship: A Comparative Perspective,” Political Behavior, vol. 37, no. 2: 331–56.
McElwain, Kenneth Mori, and Winkler, Christian G. (2015), “What's Unique about the Japanese Constitution?: A Comparative and Historical Analysis,” The Journal of Japanese Studies, vol. 41, no. 2: 249–80.
Machura, Stefan (2001), “Interaction between Lay Assessors and Professional Judges in German Mixed Courts,” Revue Internationale de Droit Pénal, vol. 72, no. 1–2: 451–79.
Mackerras, Malcolm, and McAllister, Ian (1999), “Compulsory Voting, Party Stability and Electoral Advantage in Australia,” Electoral Studies, vol. 18, no. 2: 217–33.
Maeda, Naoki (2014), “Liu Wen-ching Chen Yu-erh Jikento Amnesty International Nihonnon Setsuritsu [Contract Point between Taiwan Independent Movement in Japan and the Foundation of AI],” Hiroshima Hogaku, vol. 38, no. 2: 74–81.
Malsch, Marijke (2009), Democracy in the Courts: Lay Participation in European Criminal Justice Systems. Farnham: Ashgate.
Manow, Philip, and Burkhart, Simone (2007), “Legislative Self-Restraint under Divided Government in Germany, 1976–2002,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 2: 167–91.
Marks, Gary, Hooghe, Liesbet, Nelson, Moira, and Edwards, Erica (2006), “Party Competition and European Integration in the East and West: Different Structure, Same Causality,” Comparative Political Studies, vol. 39, no. 2: 155–75.
Martín, Ana M., and Kaplan, Martin F. (2006), “Psychological Perspectives on Spanish and Russian Juries,” in Kaplan, Martin F. and Martín, Ana M., eds., Understanding World Jury Systems Through Social Psychological Research. New York and Hove: Psychology Press.
Masuyama, Mikitaka (2000), “Is the Japanese Diet Consensual?” Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 6, no. 4: 9–28.
Masuyama, Mikitaka (2003), Gikai Seidoto Nihon Seiji [Agenda Power in the Japanese Diet]. Tokyo: Bokutakusha.
Masuyama, Mikitaka (2004), “Ripponi Okeru Jikanto Eikyoryoku [Time and Influence over Legislation],” Leviathan, vol. 35: 160–3.
Masuyama, Mikitaka (2006), “Ripponi Okeru Henkan vs. Taido Hyomei – Kokkai Shingito Futai Ketsugi [Legislative Gains versus Position Taking: How the Diet Makes Supplementary Resolutions],” Leviathan, vol. 38: 131–53.
Matsumoto, Mitsutoyo (2013), “Presidential Strength and Party Leadership in Taiwan,” in Kasuya, Yuko, ed., Presidents, Assemblies, and Policy-Making in Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Matsumoto, Mitsutoyo (2014a), “Kunosuru Yoto: Taiwan no Handaitoryosei to Chugoku Kokuminto [Ruling Party in Distress: Semi-Presidentialism in Taiwan and the KMT],” Chugoku Bunka Kenkyu, vol. 27: 1–18.
Matsumoto, Mitsutoyo (2014b), “Taiwannno Han-Daitoryosei ni okeru Seisaku Kettei [Policymaking under Taiwan's Semi-Presidential System],” Toyo Bunka, vol. 94: 29–60.
Matsumoto, Shunta, and Matsuo, Akitaka (2010), “Kokkai Giinwa Naze Iinkaide Hatsugen Surunoka? [Why Japan's Lower House Members Speak in Committes?],” Senkyo Kenkyu, no. 26-2: 84–103.
McCubbins, Mathew D., and Schwartz, Thomas (1984), “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 28, no. 1: 165–79.
McGuire, Kevin T., and Caldeira, Gregory A. (1993), “Lawyers, Organized Interests, and the Law of Obscenity: Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court,” American Political Science Review, vol. 87, no. 3: 717–26.
Meguid, Bonnie (2005), “Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success,” American Political Science Review, vol. 99, no. 3: 347–59.
Mendelberg, Tali (2002), “The Deliberative Citizen: Theory and Evidence,” in Carpini, MX Delli, Huddy, Leonie, and Shapiro, Robert, eds., Research in Micropolitics: Political Decisionmaking, Deliberation and Participation, vol. 6, no. 1: 151–93. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Michels, Robert (1911[1999]), Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Min, Young-Sung (2011), “Kokumin Sanyo Saiban Seidono Gaiyoto Seiritsuno Keii [Outline of the Korean Jury System and How it Passed],” in Goto, Akira, ed., Higashi Ajia ni okeru Shiminno Keiji Shiho Sanka [Participation in the Criminal Process in East Asia]. Tokyo: Kokusai Shoin.
Min, Young-Sung (2012), “Kankokuno Kokumin Sanyo Saibanno Genjo to Kadai [The State of Korea Jury Trials and Issues Ahead],” Horitsu Jiho, vol. 84, no. 12: 58–62.
Mitani, Taichiro (2013), Zoho Seiji Seidoto shiteno Baishinsei [The Jury as a Political Institution, Enlarged and Revised Edition]. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai.
Miyamoto, Yasuaki (2005), “Shiho Seido Kaikakuno Shiteki Kento Josetsu [A Prelude to the Examination of Judicial Reforms in Historical Perspective,” Gendai Hogaku, vol. 10: 59–88.
Miyazawa, Setsuo (2008), “The Politics of Increasing Punitiveness and the Rising Populism in Japanese Criminal Justice Policy,” Punishment & Society, vol. 10, no. 1: 47–77.
Miyazawa, Setsuo (2013), “Senshinkoku ni Okeru Hanzai Hasseiritsuno Jokyoto Nihonno Jokyoheno Kokusaiteki Kanshin [Crime Rates in Industrialized Democracies and the Interest in the Japanese Situation],” Hanzai Shakaigaku Kenkyu, vol. 38: 7–35.
Mizuno, Kunio (1999), “Shiho Seido Kaikaku Shingikaiwa Donoyouni Setsuritsu Saretaka [How the Justice System Reform Council was Established],” Gekkan Shiho Kaikaku, vol. 1, no. 1: 53–61.
Moriya, Katsuhiko (2015), “Hoshikkomaeni Jisshi sareta Hoso Sansha Shusaino Mogi Saiban [Mock Trials Sponsored by the Courts, Prosecutors, and the Bar Association Before the Law Came Into Effect],” in Mishima, Satoshi, ed., Saiban-in Saibanno Hyogi Dezain [The Design of the Deliberation Scheme in Saiban-in Trials]. Tokyo: Nihon Hyoronsha.
Moscovici, Serge (1985), “Social Influence and Conformity,” in Lindzey, Gardner and Aronson, Elliot, eds., Handbook of Social Psychology (3rd Edition), Vol. 2. New York: Random House.
Muramatsu, Michio (1981), Sengo Nihonno Kanryosei [The Postwar Japanese Bureaucracy]. Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Shimposha.
Mutz, Diana C. (2002), “The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 46, no. 4: 838–55.
National Diet Library (n.d.), “Kokkai Gijiroku Kensaku System [Search Engine for Japanese Parliamentary Minutes],” available at http://kokkai.ndl.go.jp/, accessed June 27, 2017. Neumayer, Eric (2003), “Are Left-Wing Party Strength and Corporatism Good for the Environment? Evidence from Panel Analysis of Air Pollution in OECD Countries,” Ecological Economics, vol. 45, no. 2: 203–20.
Nishino, Kiichi (2009), “Nihonkoku Kenpo to Baishinsei Sairon [The Japanese Constitution and the Jury System: A Reprise],” Hosei Riron, vol. 41, no. 2: 1–13.
O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe C. (1986), Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ogura, Yoshihisa (2013), “Saiban-in Seidono Tanjo (2) [The Birth of the Saiban-in System, Part 2],” Kansai Daigaku Hogaku Ronshu, vol. 62, no. 6: 2472–505.
Okayama, Hiroshi (2012), “Senmonsei Kenkyuno Saikosei [Reconsidering Studies of Political Expertise],” in Uchiyama, Yu, Ito, Takeshi, and Okayama, Hiroshi, eds., Senmonseino Seijigaku [The Politics of Expertise]. Kyoto: Minerva Shobo.
Okimoto, Daniel I. (1989), Between MITI and the Market: Japanese Industrial Policy for High Technology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Okumura, Makito (2009), “Daikan Minkokuno Gikai Seido [Legislative Institutions in the Republic of Korea],” Refarensu, vol. 59, no. 8: 97–125.
Onishi, Yutaka (2004), “Kankokuni okeru Ideology Seijino Fukkatsu [The Revival of Ideological Politics in Korea],” Kokusai Mondai, vol. 535: 17–30.
Onishi, Yutaka (2014), Senshinkoku Kankokuno Yuutsu [Challenges Facing South Korea as a Developed Country]. Tokyo: Chuo Koron Shinsha.
Oppermann, Kai, and Brummer, Klaus (2014), “Patterns of Junior Partner Influence on the Foreign Policy of Coalition Governments,” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 16, no. 4: 555–71.
Oppler, Alfred C. (1976), Legal Reform in Occupied Japan: A Participant Looks Back. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ota, Shozo (2015), “Bengoshi kara Mita Keiji Shihoto Saibanin Seido (1): Gaikan [Criminal Justice and the Saiban-in System from the Perspective of Defense Lawyers, Part 1: Overview],” in Matsumura, Yoshiyuki, Kinoshita, Manako, and Ota, Shozo, eds., Nihonjin kara Mita Saiban-in Seido [The Lay Judge System as Seen by the Japanese People]. Tokyo: Keiso Shobo.
Park, Hyunjun (2014), Kankokugata Law School no Tanjo [The Birth of Korean-Style Law Schools]. Okayama: Daigaku Kyoiku Shuppan.
Park, Ryan Y. (2010), “The Globalizing Jury Trial: Lessons and Insights from Korea,” American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 58, no. 3: 525–82.
Pekkanen, Robert (2006), Japan's Dual Civil Society: Members without Advocates. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Perry, H.W. (1991), Deciding to Decide: Agenda-Setting in the United States Supreme Court. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pierson, Paul (2004), Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Poguntke, Thomas (2002), “Green Parties in National Governments: From Protest to Acquiescence?” Environmental Politics, vol. 11, no. 1: 133–45.
Popova, Maria (2010), “Political Competition as an Obstacle to Judicial Independence: Evidence from Russia and Ukraine,” Comparative Political Studies, vol. 43, no. 10: 1202–229.
Popova, Maria (2012), Politicized Justice in Emerging Democracies: A Study of Courts in Russia and Ukraine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pratt, John (2007), Penal Populism. Abingdon: Routledge.
Price, Vincent (2009), “Citizens Deliberating Online: Theory and Some Evidence,” in Davies, Todd and Gangadharan, Seeta Pena, eds., Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Przeworski, Adam (2009), “Conquered or Granted? A History of Suffrage Extensions,” British Journal of Political Science, vol. 39, no. 2: 291–321.
Ramnath, Kalyani (2013), “The Colonial Difference between Law and Fact: Notes on the Criminal Jury in India,” The Indian Economic and Social History Review, vol. 50, no. 3: 341–63.
Ramseyer, J. Mark (2001), “Why Are Japanese Judges So Conservative in Politically Charged Cases?” American Political Science Review, vol. 95, no. 2: 331–44.
Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Rosenbluth, Frances M. (1993), Japan's Political Marketplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rich, Timothy S. (2014), “Party Voting Cohesion in Mixed Member Legislative Systems: Evidence from Korea and Taiwan,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 1: 113–35.
Rigger, Shelley (2011), “The Politics of Constitutional Reform in Taiwan,” in Ash, Robert, Garver, John W., and Prime, Peneleope B., eds., Taiwan's Democracy: Economic and Political Challenges. Abingdon: Routledge.
Robbennolt, Jennifer K. (2005), “Evaluating Juries by Comparison to Judges: A Benchmark for Judging?” Florida State University Law Review, vol. 32, no. 2: 469–509.
Rogers, James R. (2001), “Information and Judicial Review: A Signaling Game of Legislative–Judicial Interaction,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 45, no. 1: 84–99.
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Stephens, Evelyne Huber, and Stephens, John D. (1992), Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Saiko Saibansho (n.d.), “Kensatsu Shinsakaino Juri Kensu, Giketsu Kensuto [Number of Cases Accepted and Processed by the Prosecutorial Review Commission],” available at www.courts.go.jp/vcms_lf/kensintoukeiH27.pdf, accessed March 28, 2016. Saiko Saibansho (2015), “Saiban'into Keikenshani Taisuru Anketo Chosa Kekka Hokokusho (Heisei 26-nendo) [Results of Surveys of Former Saiban-in, FY2014],” available www.saibanin.courts.go.jp/vcms_lf/26-a-1.pdf, accessed July 6, 2017. Saiko Saibansho Jimu Sokyoku (various years[b]), Shiho Tokei Nenpo 2, Keijihen [Annual Report of Judicial Statistics. 2, Criminal Cases]. Tokyo: Saiko Saibansho Jimu Sokyoku.
Saiko Saibansho Jimu Sokyoku Keijikyoku (2009), “Mogi Saibannno Seikato Kadai,” Hanrei Times, vol. 60, no. 7: 8–52.
Saiko Saibansho Jimu Sokyoku Keijikyoku (various years), “Keiji Jikennno Gaikyo [General Situation of Criminal Cases],” Hoso Jiho.
Saito, Hiroshi (1999), “Shiho Seido Kaikaku [Judicial System Reform],” Gekkan Shiho Kaikaku, vol. 1, no. 1: 47–52.
Salamon, Lester M., Sokolowski, Wojciech, and Associates (2004), Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector, Volume Two. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
Samuels, Richard J. (1987), The Business of the Japanese State: Energy Markets in Comparative and Historical Perspective. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Samuels, David J., and Shugart, Matthew S. (2010), Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sato, Koji (1981), Kenpo [Constitutional Law]. Tokyo: Seirin Shoin Shinsha.
Sato, Koji, and Aoyama, Yoshimitsu (2001), “Tokubetsu Taidan Shiho Seido Kaikaku Shingikaiwo Furikaeru [Special Discussion: Looking Back on the Debates in the Justice System Reform Council],” Juristo, vol. 1208: 10–24.
Scarrow, Susan E. (2003), “Making Elections More Direct? Reducing the Role of Parties in Elections,” in Cain, Bruce E., Dalton, Russell J., and Scarrow, Susan E., eds., Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schmitter, Philippe C. (1974), “Still the Century of Corporatism?” The Review of Politics, vol. 36, no. 1: 85–131.
Schreurs, Miranda A. (2002), Environmental Politics in Japan, Germany, and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schumacher, Gijs, de Vries, Catherine E., and Vis, Barbara (2013), “Why Do Parties Change Positions? Party Organization and Environmental Incentives,” The Journal of Politics, vol. 75, no. 2: 464–77.
Schofer, Evan, and Hironaka, Ann (2005), “The Effects of World Society on Environmental Protection Outcomes,” Social Forces, vol. 84, no. 1: 25–47.
Schofer, Evan, and Meyer, John W. (2005), “The Worldwide Expansion of Higher Education in the Twentieth Century,” American Sociological Review, vol. 70, no. 6: 898–920.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. (1993), The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. (2002), The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sheng, Shing-Yuan (2009), “The Dynamic Triangles among Constituencies, Parties, and Legislators: A Comparison Before and After the Reform of Electoral System,” Paper Presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle, WA.
Sheyn, Elizabeth R. (2010), “A Foothold for Real Democracy in Eastern Europe: How Instituting Jury Trials in Ukraine Can Bring about Meaningful Governmental and Juridical Reforms and Can Help Spread These Reforms Across Eastern Europe,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 43, no. 3, 649–700.
Shin, Dong Woon (2012), “Kankokuni okeru Kokumin Sanyo Saibanno Aratana Tenkai [New Developments in the Korean Jury System],” Keijiho Journal, no. 32: 102–11.
Shin, Dong Woon (2014), “Kankoku [South Korea],” Kanagawa Daigaku Hogaku Kenkyusho Kenkyushoho, vol. 32: 89–108.
Shiomi, Toshitaka (1975), “Nihonno Shiho Kaikaku [Judicial Reform in Japan],” in Tokyo Daigaku Shakai Kagaku Kenkyusho, ed., Sengo Kaikaku 4: Shiho Kaikaku [Postwar Reforms, vol. 4: Judicial Reforms]. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai.
Shiroshita, Yuji (2011), “Saiban-in Saibanni okeru Ryokeino Dokoto Kadai [Trends in Saiban-in Trial Sentencing Patterns and Issues for the Future],” Hanzaito Hiko, vol. 170: 60–85.
Shiroshita, Yuji (2013), “Saiban-in Saiban ni okeru Ryokei Handan [Sentencing under the Saiban-in System],” in Shiratori, Yuji, ed., Keiji Sibanni okeru Shinrigaku Shinrikanteino Kanosei [Progress in Psychology and Psychological Expertise in Criminal Court]. Tokyo: Nihon Hyoronsha, pp. 215–48.
Shogan, Colleen J. (2007), “Anti-Intellectualism in the Modern Presidency: A Republican Populism,” Perspectives on Politics, vol. 5, no. 2: 295–303.
Shugart, Matthew Soberg (2005), “Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive and Mixed Authority Patterns,” French Politics, vol. 3, no. 3: 323–51.
Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and Carey, John M. (1992), Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simmons, Beth A., Dobbin, Frank, and Garrett, Geoffrey (2006), “Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism,” International Organization, vol. 60, no. 4: 781–810.
Songer, Donald R., Segal, Jeffrey A., and Cameron, Charles M. (1994), “The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 38, no. 3: 673–96.
Spoon, Jae-Jae, Hobolt, Sara B., and de Vries, Catherine E. (2014), “Going Green: Explaining Issue Competition on the Environment,” European Journal of Political Research, vol. 53, no. 2: 363–80.
Steinberg, David I., and Shin, Myung (2006), “Tensions in South Korean Political Parties in Transitions: From Entourage to Ideology?” Asian Survey, vol. 46, no. 4: 517–37.
Stephenson, Matthew C. (2003), “‘When the Devil Turns…’: The Political Foundations of Independent Judicial Review,” The Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 32, no. 1: 59–89.
Strodbeck, Fred L., James, Rita M., and Hawkins, Charles (1957), “Social Status in Jury Deliberations,” American Sociological Review, vol. 22, no. 6: 713–19.
Suzuki, Ken (2004), “Taiwan no Shiho Seido Kaikaku: Nihon eno Shisa [Judicial Reforms in Taiwan: Implications for Japan],” Hogaku Seminar, vol. 599: 64–7.
Symons, Beverly, and Cahill, Rowan (2005), A Turbulent Decade: Social Protest Movements and the Labour Movement, 1965–1975. Sydney: Sydney Branch, Australian Society for the Study of Labour History.
Taiwan Jury Association (2014), Pei shen tuan mei guo xian ti yan [A Fresh Experience of the US Jury System]. Taipei: Mi Le Culture Press.
Takamori, Nobuhiro (2015), “Saiban-in Saibanno Jisshi Jokyo ni Tsuite [On the Implementation of the Saiban-in Trials],” Hanzaito Hiko, no. 179: 139–60.
Takeda, Masahiro (2014), “Kensatsuwa Taisho Jikenwo Shinchoni Kiso [Prosecution Carefully Selecting Which Cases to Indict],” Journalism, vol. 292: 136–43.
Tani, Katsuhiro (2002), “Shiho Seido Kaikaku Shingikaino Seiji Katei [Political Process in the Judicial Reform Council],” Hoshakaigaku, vol. 57: 153–69.
Tani, Katsuhiro (2004), “Saiban-in Seidono Rippo Kateino Kensho [Investigating the Legislative Process of the Saiban-in System],” Meijo Hogaku, vol. 54, no. 1–2: 355–414.
Taniguchi, Naoko, and Winkler, Christian (2015), “Sekaino Nakano Nihonno Seito: Seito Koyaku Coding ni yoru Kokusai Hikaku [Japanese Political Parties in the World: An International Comparison Based on Party Manifesto Codings,” Paper Presented at the Japan Electoral Studies Association, Kumamoto, Japan.
Tanioka, Ichiro (2007), “Hanko Hikono Shitsuto Ryowo Sokuteisuru Kijun Zukurini Mukete [Guideline for Measuring Quality and Quantity of Crime & Delinquency],” Hanzai Shakaigaku Kenkyu, vol. 32: 76–86.
Thaman, Stephen C. (1995), “The Resurrection of Trial by Jury in Russia,” Stanford Journal of International Law, vol. 31, no. 1: 61–274.
Thaman, Stephen C. (1997), “Spain Returns to Trial by Jury,” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, vol. 21: 241–537.
Thaman, Stephen C. (1999), “Europe's New Jury Systems: The Cases of Spain and Russia,” Law and Contemporary Problems, vol. 62, no. 2: 233–59.
Thaman, Stephen C. (2002), “Latin America's First Modern System of Lay Participation: The Reform of Inquisitorial Justice in Venezuela,” in Donatsch, Andreas, Foster, Marc, and Schwarzenegger, Cristian, eds., Strafrecht, Strafprozessrecht Und Menschenrechte. Festschrift Für Stefan Trechsel. Zurich: Schulthess.
Thaman, Stephen C. (2007), “The Nullification of the Russian Jury: Lessons for Jury-Inspired Reform in Eurasia and beyond,” Cornell International Law Journal, vol. 40, no. 2: 355–428.
Thies, Michael F., and Yanai, Yuki (2014), “Bicameralism vs. Parliamentarism: Lessons from Japan's Twisted Diet,” Senkyo Kenkyu, vol. 30, no. 2: 60–74.
Thompson, Dennis F. (2008), “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science”. Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 11: 497–520.
Tilly, Charles C. (1997), “The Top-Down and Bottom-Up Construction of Democracy,” in Etzioni-Halevy, Eva, ed., Classes and Elites in Democracy and Democratization. New York: Garland Publishing.
Tocqueville, Alexis de (1840/2000), Democracy in America. Translated by Mansfield, Harvey C. and Winthrop, Delba. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Tokyo Bar Association, ed. (1992), Baishin Saiban [Jury Trials]. Tokyo: Gyosei.
Toshitani, Nobuyoshi (1975), “Sengo Kaikakuto Kokuminno Shiho Sanka [Postwar Reforms and Popular Participation in the Judicial System],” in Tokyo Daigaku Shakai Kagaku Kenkyusho, ed., Sengo Kaikaku 4: Shiho Kaikaku [Postwar Reforms, vol. 4: Judicial Reforms]. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai.
Toshitani, Nobuyoshi (1984), “Nihonno Baishinho [The Prewar Japanese Jury Law],” Jiyuto Seigi, vol. 35, no. 13: 4–12.
Traest, Philip (2001), “The Jury in Belgium,” Revue Internationale de Droit Pénal, vol. 72, no. 1: 27–50.
Tsai, Yun-Chu (2012), “Legislatives in Taiwan: New Electoral Rules, New Representative Roles, and Experienced Politicians,” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA.
Tsuchiya, Yoshiaki (2005), Shiminno Shihowa Jitsugen Shitaka [Did A Citizen-Centric Judicial System Come About?]. Tokyo: Kadensha.
Tsuji, Yuki (2012), Kazoku Shugiteki Fukushi Regimeno Saihento Gender Seiji [Realignment of the Familialist Welfare Regime and Gender Politics]. Kyoto: Minerva Shobo.
Tsuji, Hironori (2015), Saiban-in-ho/Keiji Soshoho [Act on Criminal Trials with Participation of Saiban-in/Code of Criminal Procedure]. Tokyo: Shoji Homu.
Turner, Ralph V. (1968), “The Origins of the Medieval English Jury: Frankish, English, or Scandinavian?” The Journal of British Studies, vol. 7, no. 2: 1–10.
Ueno, Nobuko (1998), “Kyutenpo de Susumu Jiminto Shiho Seido Tokubetsu Chosakaino ‘Shiho Kaikaku’ Teigen [LDP Special Research Commission on the Justice System's Proposals for ‘Judicial Reform’: Hastily Put Together],” Ho to Minshushugi, vol. 326: 55–7.
Umakoshi, Toru (2010), Kankoku Daigaku Kaikakuno Dainamizumu [The Dynamics of Korean University System Reform]. Tokyo: Yushindo.
Upham, Frank K. (1987), Law and Social Change in Postwar Japan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Vanberg, Georg (2005), The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vanoverbeke, Dmitri (2015), Juries in the Japanese Legal System: The Continuing Struggle for Citizen Participation and Democracy. London: Routledge.
Vidmar, Neil (2000), “The Jury Elsewhere in the World,” in Vidmar, Neil, ed., World Jury Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vidmar, Neil, and Wolfe, Matthew W. (2009), “Punitive Damages,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, vol. 5: 179–99.
Volkens, Andrea (2007), “Strengths and Weaknesses of Approaches to Measuring Policy Positions of Parties,” Electoral Studies, vol. 26, no. 1: 108–20.
Wade, Robert (1990), Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wang, Jaw-Perng (2006), “Taiwan Keiji Shiho Kaikakuno Seiko [The Success of Criminal Justice Reform in Taiwan],” Meijo Hogaku, vol. 55, no. 4: 1–34.
Wang, Jaw-Perng (2011), “The Evolution and Revolution of Taiwan's Criminal Justice,” Taiwan in Comparative Perspective, vol. 3: 8–29.
Wang, Zhuoyu, and Fukurai, Hiroshi (2010), “Popular Legal Participation in China and Japan,” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, vol. 38, no. 4: 236–60.
Watson, Alan (1974), Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. Athens and London: University of Georgia Press.
Weber, Ingram (2009), “The New Japanese Jury System: Empowering the Public, Preservation Continental Justice,” East Asia Law Review, vol. 4, no. 1: 125–76.
Wilson, Matthew J., Hiroshi, Fukurai, and Takashi, Maruta (2015), Japan and Civil Jury Trials: The Convergence of Forces. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Woo-Cumings, Meredith, ed. (1999), The Developmental State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Wuthnow, Robert (1994), Sharing the Journey: Support Groups and America's New Quest for Community. New York: Free Press.
Yamamoto, Satoshi (2015), “Saiban-in Saibanno Jisshi Jokyo Bunseki karamiru Shiminno Seigikan [Japanese Citizens' Sense of Justice as Seen in the Analysis of the Implementation of the Saiban-in Trials],” NCCD Japan, vol. 50: 61–87.
Yamazaki, Ushio (2001), “Shiho Seido Kaikakuwo Furikaette [Looking Back on the Judicial Reforms],” Shiho Hoseibu Kiho, vol. 108: 1–3.
Yanase, Noboru (2007), “Saiban-in Hono Rippo Katei (1) [Legislating the Saiban-in Law (Part 1)],” Shinshu Daigaku Hogaku Ronshu, vol. 8: 99–140.
Yanase, Noboru (2008), “Saiban-in Hono Rippo Katei (3) [Legislating the Saiban-in Law (Part 3)],” Shinshu Daigaku Hogaku Ronshu, vol. 10: 119–64.
Yasuoka, Okiharu (2009), Seiji Shudono Jidai [The Era of Political Leadership]. Tokyo: Chuo Koron Shinsha.
Yonekura, Tsutomu (2012), “Jijitsu Ninteito Ryokeino Ryomenkara Mieru Jubatsuka Genbastuka Gensho [The Increasing Severity of Punishments from the Perspective of both Factual Determination and Sentencing],” Ho to Minshu Shugi, vol. 474: 63–5.
Yoon, Yong-Taek (2001), “Kankokuni okeru Shiho Seidono Hensento Shiho Kaikakuno Genjo [Changes in the Korean Judicial System and the Current State of Judicial Reforms],” Shakai Taiseito Ho, vol. 2: 2–20.
