Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T12:54:38.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - Tubal Anastomosis for Reversal of Tubal Ligation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2018

By
Jeffrey M. Goldberg  and
Julian A. Gingold
Edited by
Jeffrey M. Goldberg ,
Ceana H. Nezhat  and
Jay Ira Sandlow
Jeffrey M. Goldberg
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic
Ceana H. Nezhat
Affiliation:
Nezhat Medical Center, Atlanta
Jay Ira Sandlow
Affiliation:
Medical College of Wisconsin
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Reproductive Surgery
The Society for Reproductive Surgeons' Manual
 , pp. 50 - 54
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mosher, WD, Martinez, GM, Chandra, A, Abma, JC, Willson, SJ. Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982–2002. Adv Data. 2004;1–36.Google Scholar
Bartz, D, Greenberg, JA. Sterilization in the United States. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008;1:23–32.Google Scholar
Hillis, SD, Marchbanks, PA, Tylor, LR, Peterson, HB. Poststerilization regret: findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93:889–95.Google Scholar
Peterson, HB, Xia, Z, Hughes, JM, Wilcox, LS, Tylor, LR, Trussell, J. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:1161-8-70.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:e37–43.Google Scholar
Trimbos-Kemper, TC. Reversal of sterilization in women over 40 years of age: a multicenter survey in the Netherlands. Fertil Steril. 1990;53:575–7.Google Scholar
Kim, JD, Kim, KS, Doo, JK, Rhyeu, CH. A report on 387 cases of microsurgical tubal reversals. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:875–80.Google Scholar
Dubuisson, JB, et al. Sterilization reversal: fertility results. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1145–51.Google Scholar
Berger, GS, Thorp, JM, Weaver, MA. Effectiveness of bilateral tubotubal anastomosis in a large outpatient population. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:1120–5.Google Scholar
Malacova, E, et al. Live delivery outcome after tubal sterilization reversal: a population-based study. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:921–6.Google Scholar
Boeckxstaens, A, Devroey, P, Collins, J, Tournaye, H. Getting pregnant after tubal sterilization: surgical reversal or IVF? Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2660–4.Google Scholar
Gomel, V. The place of reconstructive tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive techniques. Reprod Biomed Online, 2015;31:722–31.Google Scholar
Messinger, LB, et al. Cost and efficacy comparison of in vitro fertilization and tubal anastomosis for women after tubal ligation. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:32–38.e4.Google Scholar
Petrucco, OM, Silber, SJ, Chamberlain, SL, Warnes, GM, Davies, M. Live birth following day surgery reversal of female sterilisation in women older than 40 years: a realistic option in Australia? Med J Aust. 2007;187:271–3.Google Scholar
Cha, SH, et al. Fertility outcome after tubal anastomosis by laparoscopy and laparotomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001;8:348–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodgers, AK, Goldberg, JM, Hammel, JP, Falcone, T. Tubal anastomosis by robotic compared with outpatient minilaparotomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:1375–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dharia Patel, SP, Steinkampf, MP, Whitten, SJ, Malizia, BA. Robotic tubal anastomosis: surgical technique and cost effectiveness. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:1175–9.Google Scholar
Monteith, CW, Berger, GS, Zerden, ML. Pregnancy success after hysteroscopic sterilization reversal. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124:1183–9.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×