Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T03:23:12.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - Ovarian Surgery with a Focus on Reproduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2018

By
Nigel Pereira  and
Samantha M. Pfeifer
Edited by
Jeffrey M. Goldberg ,
Ceana H. Nezhat  and
Jay Ira Sandlow
Jeffrey M. Goldberg
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic
Ceana H. Nezhat
Affiliation:
Nezhat Medical Center, Atlanta
Jay Ira Sandlow
Affiliation:
Medical College of Wisconsin
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Reproductive Surgery
The Society for Reproductive Surgeons' Manual
 , pp. 33 - 42
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Legendre, G, Catala, L, Morinière, C, et al. Relationship between ovarian cysts and infertility: what surgery and when? Fertil Steril. 2014;101(3):608–14.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Management of adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(1):201–14.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, British Society of Gynaecologic Endoscopists. Management of suspected ovarian masses in premenopausal women. RCOG Green-Top Guideline; 2011:62. www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg62/ (accessed on October 12, 2016).Google Scholar
Padilla, LA, Radosevich, DM, Milad, MP. Accuracy of the pelvic examination in detecting adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(4):593–8.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin. Evaluation and management of adnexal masses. Number 174, November 2016.Google Scholar
Van Holsbeke, C, Van Calster, B, Guerriero, S, et al. Endometriomas: their ultrasound characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35(6):730–40.Google Scholar
Patel, MD, Feldstein, VA, Lipson, SD, Chen, DC, Filly, RA. Cystic teratomas of the ovary: diagnostic value of sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171(4):1061–5.Google Scholar
Theodoridis, TD, Zepiridis, L, Mikos, T, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound with laparoscopy in the management of patients with adnexal masses. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280(5):767–73.Google Scholar
Im, SS, Gordon, AN, Buttin, BM, et al. Validation of referral guidelines for women with pelvic masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(1):35–41.Google Scholar
MacKenna, A, Fabres, C, Alam, V, Morales, V. Clinical management of functional ovarian cysts: a prospective and randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(12):2567–9.Google Scholar
Grimes, DA, Jones, LB, Lopez, LM, Schulz, KF. Oral contraceptives for functional ovarian cysts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(4):CD006134.Google Scholar
Hart, RJ, Hickey, M, Maouris, P, Buckett, W. Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometriomata. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(2):CD004992.Google ScholarPubMed
Psaroudakis, D, Hirsch, M, Davis, C. Review of the management of ovarian endometriosis: paradigm shift towards conservative approaches. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;26(4):266–74.Google Scholar
Dan, H, Limin, F. Laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy versus fenestration/coagulation or laser vaporization for the treatment of endometriomas: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2013;76:75–82.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, H, Kajihara, H, Yamada, Y, et al. Risk of carcinoma in women with ovarian endometrioma. Front Biosci. 2011;3:529–39.Google Scholar
Kalampokas, T, Kamath, MS, Kalampokaset, E. AMH after laparoscopic surgery of the ovaries: a review. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29:408–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iwase, A, Nakamura, T, Nakahara, T, Goto, M, Kikkawa, F. Assessment of ovarian reserve using anti-Müllerian hormone levels in benign gynecologic conditions and surgical interventions: a systematic narrative review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 ;12:125.Google Scholar
Chang, HJ, Han, SH, Lee, JR, et al. Impact of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve: serial changes of serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:343–9.Google Scholar
Chen, Y, Pei, H, Chang, Y, et al. The impact of endometrioma and laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve and the exploration of related factors assessed by serum anti-Mullerian hormone: a prospective cohort study. J Ovarian Res. 2014 ;7:108.Google Scholar
Kuroda, M, Kuroda, K, Arakawa, A, et al. Histological assessment of impact of ovarian endometrioma and laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve. Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012;38:1187–93.Google Scholar
Goodman, LR, Goldberg, JM, Flyckt, RL, et al. Effect of surgery on ovarian reserve in women with endometriomas, endometriosis and controls. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:589.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somigliana, E, Benaglia, L, Paffoni, A, Busnelli, A, Vigano, P, Vercellini, P. Risks of conservative management in women with ovarian endometriomas undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21:486–99.Google Scholar
Benschop, L, Farquhar, C, van der Poel, N, Heineman, MJ. Interventions for women with endometrioma prior to assisted reproductive technology (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;CD008571.Google Scholar
ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:400–12.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Endometriosis and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:591–8.Google Scholar
Tsoumpou, I, Kyrgiou, M, Gelbaya, TA, Nardo, LG. The effect of surgical treatment for endometrioma on in vitro fertilization outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:75–87.Google Scholar
Keckstein, J, Ulrich, U, Sasse, V, Roth, A, Tuttlies, F, Karageorgieva, E. Reduction of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:579–82.Google Scholar
Uncu, G, Kasapoglu, I, Ozerkan, K, Seyhan, A, Oral Yilmaztepe, A, Ata, B. Prospective assessment of the impact of endometriomas and their removal on ovarian reserve and determinants of the rate of decline in ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(8):2140–5.Google Scholar
Benaglia, L, Candotti, G, Busnelli, A, Paffoni, A, Vercellini, P, Somigliana, E. Antral follicle count as a predictor of ovarian responsiveness in women with endometriomas or with a history of surgery for endometriomas. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(6):1544–50.e1–3.Google Scholar
Jang, WK, Lim, SY, Park, JC, Lee, KR, Lee, A, Rhee, JH. Surgical impact on serum anti-Müllerian hormone in women with benign ovarian cyst: a prospective study. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2014;57(2):121–7.Google Scholar
Cagnacci, A, Bellafronte, M, Xholli, A, et al. Impact of laparoscopic cystectomy of endometriotic and non-endometriotic cysts on ovarian volume, antral follicle count (AFC) and ovarian doppler velocimetry. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32(4):298–301.Google Scholar
Mohamed, AA, Al-Hussaini, TK, Fathalla, MM, El Shamy, TT, Abdelaal, II, Amer, SA. The impact of excision of benign nonendometriotic ovarian cysts on ovarian reserve: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(2):169–76.Google Scholar
Raffi, F, Metwally, M, Amer, S. The impact of excision of ovarian endometrioma on ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(9):3146–54.Google Scholar
Pergialiotis, V, Prodromidou, A, Frountzas, M, Bitos, K, Perrea, D, Doumouchtsis, SK. The effect of bipolar electrocoagulation during ovarian cystectomy on ovarian reserve: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(5):620–8.Google Scholar
Ata, B, Turkgeldi, E, Seyhan, A, Urman, B. Effect of hemostatic method on ovarian reserve following laparoscopic endometrioma excision: comparison of suture, hemostatic sealant, and bipolar dessication. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(3):363–72.Google Scholar
Spinelli, C, Piscioneri, J, Strambi, S. Adnexal torsion in adolescents: update and review of the literature. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27(5):320–5.Google Scholar
Sasaki, KJ, Miller, CE. Adnexal torsion: review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(2):196–202.Google Scholar
Huchon, C, Staraci, S, Fauconnier, A. Adnexal torsion: a predictive score for pre-operative diagnosis. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(9):2276–80.Google Scholar
Huchon, C, Fauconnier, A. Adnexal torsion: a literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;150(1):8–12.Google Scholar
Ganer Herman, H, Shalev, A, Ginat, S, Kerner, R, Keidar, R, Bar, J, Sagiv, R. Clinical characteristics of adnexal torsion in premenarchal patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;293(3):603–8.Google Scholar
Ginath, S, Shalev, A, Keidar, R, et al. Differences between adnexal torsion in pregnant and nonpregnant women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19(6):708–14.Google Scholar
McWilliams, GD, Hill, MJ, Dietrich, CS 3rd. Gynecologic emergencies. Surg Clin North Am. 2008;88(2):265–83.Google Scholar
Shadinger, LL, Andreotti, RF, Kurian, RL. Preoperative sonographic and clinical characteristics as predictors of ovarian torsion. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27(1):7–13.Google Scholar
Mashiach, R, Melamed, N, Gilad, N, Ben-Shitrit, G, Meizner, I. Sonographic diagnosis of ovarian torsion: accuracy and predictive factors. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(9):1205–10.Google Scholar
Rha, SE, Byun, JY, Jung, SE, et al. CT and MR imaging features of adnexal torsion. Radiographics. 2002;22(2):283–94.Google Scholar
Cohen, SB, Wattiez, A, Seidman, DS, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for detorsion and sparing of twisted ischemic adnexa. JSLS. 2003;7(4):295–9.Google Scholar
McGovern, PG, Noah, R, Koenigsberg, R, Little, AB. Adnexal torsion and pulmonary embolism: case report and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1999;54(9):601–8.Google Scholar
Shalev, E, Bustan, M, Yarom, I, Peleg, D. Recovery of ovarian function after laparoscopic detorsion. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(11):2965–6.Google Scholar
Pansky, M, Smorgick, N, Herman, A, Schneider, D, Halperin, R. Torsion of normal adnexa in postmenarchal women and risk of recurrence. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(2 Pt 1):355–9.Google Scholar
Celik, A, Ergün, O, Aldemir, H, et al. Long-term results of conservative management of adnexal torsion in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40(4):704–8.Google Scholar
Geimanaite, L, Trainavicius, K. Ovarian torsion in children: management and outcomes. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(9):1946–53.Google Scholar
Lacher, M, Kuebler, JF, Yannam, GR, et al. Single-incision pediatric endosurgery for ovarian pathology. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23(3):291–6.Google Scholar
Oelsner, G, Cohen, SB, Soriano, D, Admon, D, Mashiach, S, Carp, H. Minimal surgery for the twisted ischaemic adnexa can preserve ovarian function. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(12):2599–602.Google Scholar
Oelsner, G, Bider, D, Goldenberg, M, Admon, D, Mashiach, S. Long-term follow-up of the twisted ischemic adnexa managed by detorsion. Fertil Steril. 1993;60(6):976–9.Google Scholar
Donesky, BW, Adashi, EY. Surgically induced ovulation in the polycystic ovary syndrome: wedge resection revisited in the age of laparoscopy. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:439–63.Google Scholar
Gjönnaess, H. Polycystic ovarian syndrome treated by ovarian electrocautery through the laparoscope. Fertil Steril. 1984;41:20–5.Google Scholar
Seow, KM, Juan, CC, Hwang, JL, Ho, LT. Laparoscopic surgery in polycystic ovary syndrome: reproductive and metabolic effects. Semin Reprod Med. 2008;26:101–110.Google Scholar
Fernandez, H, Morin-Surruca, M, Torre, A, Faivre, E, Deffieux, X, Gervaise, A. Ovarian drilling for surgical treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome: a comprehensive review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;22:556–68.Google Scholar
Amer, SAK, Li, TC, Cooke, ID. A prospective dose-finding study of the amount of thermal energy required for laparoscopic ovarian diathermy. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1693–8.Google Scholar
Dabirashrafi, H. Complications of laparoscopic ovarian cauterization. Fertil Steril. 1989;52:878–9Google ScholarPubMed
Armar, NA, McGarrigle, HHG, Honour, J, Holownia, P, Jacobs, HS, Lachelin, GCL. Laparoscopic ovarian diathermy in the management of anovulatory infertility in women with polycystic ovaries:endocrine changes and clinical outcome. Fertil Steril. 1990;53:45–9.Google Scholar
Gurgan, T, Urman, B, Aksu, T, Yarali, H, Develioglu, O, Kisnisci, HA. The effect of short-interval laparoscopic lysis of adhesions on pregnancy rates following Nd-YAG laser photocoagulation of polycystic ovaries. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80:45–7.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, EM, Casper, RF. Adhesion formation after laparoscopic ovarian cautery for polycystic ovarian syndrome: lack of correlation with pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 1993;60:766–70.Google Scholar
Mercorio, F, Mercorio, A, Di Spiezio Sardo, A, Barba, GV, Pellicano, M, Nappi, C. Evaluation of ovarian adhesion formation after laparoscopic ovarian drilling by second look minilaparoscopy. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1229–33.Google Scholar
Api, M. Is ovarian reserve diminished after laparoscopic ovarian drilling? Gynecol Endocrinol. 2009;25:159–65Google Scholar
Campo, S. Ovulatory cycles, pregnancy outcomes and complications after surgical treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1998;53:297–308.Google Scholar
The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Consensus on infertility treatment related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:505–22.Google Scholar
Farquhar, C, Brown, J, Marjoribanks, J. Laparoscopic drilling by diathermy or laser for ovulation induction in anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 ;6. Art. No:CD001122.Google Scholar
Abu Hashim, H, El Lakany, N, Sherief, L. Combined metformin and clomiphene citrate versus laparoscopic ovarian diathermy for ovulation induction in clomiphene-resistant women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011;37:169–77.Google Scholar
Abu Hashim, H, Foda, O, Ghayaty, E. Combined metformin-clomiphene in clomiphene resistant polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94:921–30.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×