Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-25T19:50:15.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Sociality in Ants

from Part I - Invertebrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2017

Dustin R. Rubenstein
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Patrick Abbot
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University, Tennessee
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbot, P., Abe, J., Alcock, J., et al. (2011) Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality. Nature, 471, E1E4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abril, A. B. & Bucher, E. H. (2002) Evidence that the fungus cultured by leaf-cutting ants does not metabolize cellulose. Biology Letters, 5, 325328.Google Scholar
Achenbach, A. & Foitzik, S. (2009) First evidence for slave rebellion: Enslaved ant workers systematically kill the brood of their social parasite Protomognathus americanus. Evolution, 63, 10681075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aesop (2011) Aesop’s Fables. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Agosti, D., & Johnson, N. F. (editors) (2005) Antbase. World Wide Web electronic publication. antbase.org, version (05/2005).Google Scholar
Alexander, R. D. (1974) The evolution of social behavior. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5, 325383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C. & Franks, N. R. (2001) Teams in animal societies. Behavioral Ecology, 12, 535540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K. E., Russell, J. A., Moreau, C. S., et al. (2012) Highly similar microbial communities are shared among related and trophically similar ant species. Molecular Ecology, 21, 22822296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersson, M. (1984) The evolution of eusociality. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 15, 165189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aylward, F. O., Burnum-Johnson, K. E., Tringe, S. G., et al. (2013) Leucoagaricus gongylophorus produces diverse enzymes for the degradation of recalcitrant plant polymers in leaf-cutter ant fungus gardens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 79, 37703778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bacci, M., Anversa, M. M., & Pagnocca, F. C. (1995) Cellulose degradation by Leucocoprinus gongylophorus, the fungus cultured by the leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens rubropilosa. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Journal of Microbiology, 67, 385386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bacci, M. J., Bueno, O. C., Rodrigues, A., et al. (2013) A metabolic pathway assembled by enzyme selection may support herbivory of leaf-cutter ants on plant starch. Journal of Insect Physiology, 59, 525531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernasconi, G. & Strassmann, J. E. (1999) Cooperation among unrelated individuals: The ant foundress case. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14, 477482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beshers, S. N. & Fewell, J. W. (2001) Models of division of labor in social insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 46, 413440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Billen, J. & Morgan, E. D. (1998) Pheromone communication in social insects: Sources and secretions. In: Vander Meer, R. K., Breed, M. D., Espelie, K. E., & Winston, M. L. (eds). Pheromone Communication in Social Insects. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 333.Google Scholar
Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., & Theraulaz, G. (1999) Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boomsma, J. J. (1996) Split sex ratios and queen–male conflict over sperm allocation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 263, 697704.Google Scholar
Boomsma, J. J. (2007) Kin selection versus sexual selection: Why the ends do not meet. Current Biology, 17, R673R683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boomsma, J. J. (2013) Beyond promiscuity: Mate-choice commitments in social breeding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 368, 20120050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boomsma, J. J., Baer, B. & Heinze, J. (2005) The evolution of male traits in social insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 50, 395420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourke, A. F. G. (1988) Dominance orders, worker reproduction, and queen–worker conflict in the slave-making ant Harpagoxenus sublaevis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 23, 323333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourke, A. F. G. (1999) Colony size, social complexity and reproductive conflict in social insects. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12, 245257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourke, A. F. G. (2011) Principles of Social Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourke, A. F. G. (2007) Kin selection and the evolutionary theory of aging. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 38, 103128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourke, A. F. G. & Franks, N. R. (1995) Social Evolution in Ants. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bourke, A. F. G. & Heinze, J. (1994) The ecology of communal breeding: The case of multiply-queened leptothoracine ants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 345, 359372.Google Scholar
Brandt, M., Foitzik, S., Fischer-Blass, B. & Heinze, J. (2005) The coevolutionary dynamics of obligate ant social parasite systems — between prudence and antagonism. Biological Reviews, 80, 251267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brunner, E., Kellner, K., & Heinze, J. (2009) Policing and dominance behaviour in the parthenogenetic ant Platythyrea punctata. Animal Behaviour, 78, 14271431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, M. J. F. & Bonhoeffer, S. (2003) On the evolution of claustral colony founding in ants. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 5, 305313.Google Scholar
Brown, M. J. F. & Schmid-Hempel, P. (2003) The evolution of female multiple mating in social Hymenoptera. Evolution, 57, 20672081.Google ScholarPubMed
Buschinger, A. (1986) Evolution of social parasitism in ants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 1, 155160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buschinger, A. (2009) Social parasitism among ants: A review (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 12, 219235.Google Scholar
Cassill, D. L., Butler, J., Vinson, S. B., & Wheeler, D. E. (2005) Cooperation during prey digestion between workers and larvae in the ant, Pheidole spadonia. Insectes Sociaux, 52, 339343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J., & Rowe, L. (2003) Sexual conflict. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 4147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, B. J. (1983) Multiple mating and the evolution of social behavior in the Hymenoptera. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 12, 191201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, B. J. & Wiernasz, D. C. (1999) The selective advantage of low relatedness. Science, 285, 891893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, J. M. (1993) Sex determination in the Hymenoptera: A review of models and evidence. Heredity, 71, 421435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, M. & Fjerdingstad, E. J. (2011) Mating strategies of queens in Lasius niger ant: Is environment type important? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65, 889897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremer, S. & Heinze, J. (2002) Adaptive production of fighter males: Queens of the ant Cardiocondyla adjust the sex ratio under local mate competition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 417422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crozier, R. H. & Pamilo, P. (1996) Evolution of Social Insect Colonies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. W. (1985) An experimental study of diffuse competition in harvester ants. The American Naturalist, 125, 500505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1979) Twelve misunderstandings of kin selection. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 51, 184200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debout, G., Schatz, B., Elias, M., & McKey, D. (2007) Polydomy in ants: What we know, what we think we know, and what remains to be done. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 90, 319348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Fine Licht, H. H. & Boomsma, J. J. (2010) Forage collection, substrate preparation, and diet composition in fungus-growing ants. Ecological Entomology, 35, 259269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Fine Licht, H. H., Schiøtt, M., Mueller, U. G., & Boomsma, J. J. (2010) Evolutionary transitions in enzyme activity of ant fungus gardens. Evolution, 64, 20552069.Google ScholarPubMed
d’Ettorre, P. & Moore, A. J. (2008) Chemical communication and the coordination of social interactions in insects. In: d’Ettorre, P & Hughes, D. P., D. P. (eds). Sociobiology of Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 8196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietemann, V., Peeters, C. & Hölldobler, B. (2004) Gamergates in the Australian ant subfamily Myrmeciinae. Naturwissenschaften, 91, 432435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorigo, M. & Stützle, T. (2004) Ant Colony Optimization. Boston, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dornhaus, A., Powell, S. & Bengston, S. (2012) Group size and its effects on collective organization. Annual Review of Entomology, 57, 123141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dussutour, A., Fourcassié, V., Helbing, D., & Deneubourg, J. L. (2004) Optimal traffic organization in ants under crowded conditions. Nature, 428, 7073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erthal, M., Silva, C., Cooper, R., & Samuels, R. (2009) Hydrolytic enzymes of leaf-cutting ant fungi. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B, 152, 5459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldhaar, H., Straka, J., Krischke, M., et al. (2007) Nutritional upgrading for omnivorous carpenter ants by the endosymbiont Blochmannia. BMC Biology, 5, 48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foitzik, S. & Heinze, J. (2000) Intraspecific parasitism and split sex ratios in a monogynous and monandrous ant (Leptothorax nylanderi). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 47, 424431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, A. (1980) Worker control of queen density in hymenopteran societies. The American Naturalist, 116, 895898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, K. R., Wenseleers, T., Ratnieks, F. L. W., & Queller, D. C. (2006) There is nothing wrong with inclusive fitness. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21, 599600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fournier, D., Estoup, A., Orivel, J., et al. (2005) Clonal reproduction by males and females in the little fire ant. Nature, 435, 12301234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fournier, D., Battaille, G., Timmermans, I. & Aron, S. (2008) Genetic diversity, worker size polymorphism and division of labour in the polyandrous ant Cataglyphis cursor. Animal Behaviour, 75, 151158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadau, J., Helmkampf, M., Nygaard, S., et al. (2012) The genomic impact of 100 million years of social evolution in seven ant species. Trends in Genetics, 28, 1421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, A. & Ross, L. (2013) Haplodiploidy, sex-ratio adjustment, and eusociality. The American Naturalist, 181, E60E67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, A., Alpedrinha, J. & West, S. A. (2012) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of eusociality: Split sex ratios. The American Naturalist, 179, 240256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garnier, S., Gautrais, J. & Theraulaz, G. (2007) The biological principles of swarm intelligence. Swarm Intelligence, 1, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraud, T., Pedersen, J. S., & Keller, L. (2002) Evolution of supercolonies: The Argentine ants of southern Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 99, 60756079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, D. M. (1996) The organization of work in social insect colonies. Nature, 380, 121124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, D. M., Holmes, S. & Nacu, S. (2008) The short-term regulation of foraging in harvester ants. Behavioral Ecology, 19, 217222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goss, S., Aron, S., Deneubourg, J. L., & Pasteels, J. M. (1989) Self-organized shortcuts in the Argentine Ant. Naturwissenschaften, 76, 579581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, M. J. & Gordon, D. M. (2003) Social insects: Cuticular hydrocarbons inform task decisions. Nature, 432, 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I & II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, W. D. (1978) Evolution and diversity under bark. In: Mound, L. A. & Waloff, N. (eds.) Diversity of Insect Faunas. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, pp. 154175.Google Scholar
Hammond, R. L. & Keller, L. (2004) Conflict over male parentage in social insects. PLoS Biology, 2, e248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammond, R. L., Bruford, M. W. & Bourke, A. F. G. (2002) Ant workers selfishly bias sex ratios by manipulating female development. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 173178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hannonen, M. & Sundström, L. (2003) Sociobiology: Worker nepotism among polygynous ants. Nature, 421, 910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartfelder, K. & Emlen, D. J. (2012) Endocrine control of insect polyphenism. In: Gilbert, L. I. (ed.) Insect Endocrinology. London: Academic Press, pp. 651703.Google Scholar
Hartmann, A. & Heinze, J. (2003) Lay eggs, live longer: Division of labor and life span in a clonal ant species. Evolution, 57, 24242429.Google Scholar
Heinze, J. (1993) Life history strategies of subarctic ants. Arctic, 46, 354358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinze, J. (1998) Intercastes, intermorphs, and ergatoid queens: Who is who in ant reproduction? Insectes Sociaux, 45, 113124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinze, J. (2004) Reproductive conflict in insect societies. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 34, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinze, J. (2008) The demise of the standard ant. Myrmecological News, 11, 920.Google Scholar
Heinze, J. & d’Ettorre, P. (2009) Honest and dishonest communication in social Hymenoptera. Journal of Experimental Biology, 212, 17751779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinze, J. & Hölldobler, B. (1993) Fighting for a harem of queens: Physiology of reproduction in Cardiocondyla male ants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 90, 84128414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinze, J. & Keller, L. (2000) Alternative reproductive strategies: A queen perspective in ants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 508512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinze, J. & Schrempf, A. (2008) Aging and reproduction in social insects. Gerontology, 54, 160167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helanterä, H., Strassmann, J. E., & Queller, D. C. (2009) Unicolonial ants: Where do they come from, what are they and where are they going? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24, 341349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helanterä, H., Aehle, O., Roux, M., Heinze, J., & d’Ettorre, P. (2013) Family-based guilds in the ant Pachycondyla inversa. Biology Letters, 9, 20130125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herbers, J. M. (1993) Ecological determinants of queen number in ants. In: Keller, L. (ed.) Queen Number and Sociality in Insects. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 262293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hölldobler, B. (1995) The chemistry of social regulation: Multicomponent signals in ant societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 92, 1922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hölldobler, B. (1999) Multimodal signals in ant communication. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 184, 129141.Google Scholar
Hölldobler, B. & Bartz, S. H. (1985) Sociobiology of reproduction in ants. In Hölldobler, B. & Lindauer, M. (eds.) Experimental Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer, pp. 237257.Google Scholar
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. (1977) The number of queens: An important trait in ant evolution. Naturwissenschaften, 64, 815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. (1990) The Ants. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. (2008) The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance, and Strangeness of Insect Societies. New York, N.Y.: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. (2011) The Leafcutter Ants. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Holman, L., Dreier, S. & d’Ettorre, P. (2010a) Selfish strategies and honest signalling: Reproductive conflicts in ant queen associations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 277, 20072015.Google ScholarPubMed
Holman, L., Jørgensen, C. G., Nielsen, J., & d’Ettorre, P. (2010b) Identification of an ant queen pheromone regulating worker sterility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 277, 37933800.Google ScholarPubMed
Holway, D. A., Lach, L., Suarez, A. V., Tsutsui, N. D., & Case, T. D. (2002) The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 181233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, W. O. H & Boomsma, J. J. (2004) Genetic diversity and disease resistance in leaf-cutting ant societies. Evolution, 58, 12511260.Google ScholarPubMed
Hughes, W. O. H., Sumner, S., Van Borm, S., & Boomsma, J. J. (2003) Worker caste polymorphism has a genetic basis in Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 100, 93949397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, W. O. H., Oldroyd, B. P., Beekman, M., & Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2008) Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science, 320, 12131216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. H. (2007) The Evolution of Social Wasps. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. H. (2012) A conceptual model for the origin of worker behaviour and adaptation of eusociality. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25, 119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, J. H. & Amdam, G. C. (2005) Bivoltinism as an antecedent to eusociality in the paper wasp genus Polistes. Science, 308, 264267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kadochova, Š. & Frouz, J. (2012) Thermoregulation strategies in ants in comparison to other social insects, with a focus on Formica rufa. F1000Research, 2, 280.Google Scholar
Kaspari, M., O’Donnell, S., & Kercher, J. R. (2000) Energy, density, and constraints to species richness: Ant assemblages along a productivity gradient. The American Naturalist, 155, 280293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, L. & Genoud, M. (1997) Extraordinary lifespans in ants: A test of evolutionary theories of ageing. Nature, 389, 958960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, L. & Passera, L. (1989) Size and fat content of gynes in relation to the mode of colony founding in ants (Hymenoptera; Formicidae). Oecologia, 80, 236240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, L. & Reeve, H. K. (1994) Genetic variability, queen number, and polyandry in social Hymenoptera. Evolution, 48, 694704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kellner, K., Ishak, H. D., Linksvayer, T. A., & Mueller, U. G. (2015) Bacterial community composition and diversity in an ancestral ant fungus symbiosis. FEMS Microbiologyl Ecology, 91, fiv073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khila, A. & Abouheif, E. (2010) Evaluating the role of reproductive constraints in ant social evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365, 617630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, J. R. & Tschinkel, W. R. (2008) Experimental evidence that human impacts drive fire ant invasions and ecological change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 105, 2033920343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, J. R., Warren, R. J., & Bradford, M. A. (2013) Social insects dominate eastern US temperate hardwood forest macroinvertebrate communities in warmer regions. PLoS ONE, 8, e75843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinomura, K. & Yamauchi, K. (1987) Fighting and mating behaviors of dimorphic males in the ant Cardiocondyla wroughtoni. Journal of Ethology, 5, 7581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kocher, S. D. & Grozinger, C. D. (2011) Cooperation, conflict and the evolution of queen pheromones. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 37, 12631275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korb, J. & Heinze, J. (2008) The ecology of social life: A synthesis. In: Korb, J. & Heinze, J. (eds.). Ecology of Social Evolution. Berlin: Springer, pp. 245259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korb, J. & Heinze, J. (2016) Major hurdles for the evolution of sociality. Annual Review of Entomology, 61. 297316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kusnezov, N. (1957) Numbers of species of ants in faunae of different latitudes. Evolution, 11, 298299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lach, L., Parr, C. L., & Abbott, K. L. (2009) Ant Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, J. S., Dlussky, G. M. & Perrichot, V. (2013) Ants and the fossil record. Annual Review of Entomology, 58, 609630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Conte, Y. & Hefetz, A. (2008) Primer pheromones in social Hymenoptera. Annual Review of Entomology, 53, 523542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenoir, A., d’Ettorre, P., Errard, C., & Hefetz, A. (2001) Chemical ecology and social parasitism in ants. Annual Review of Entomology, 46, 573599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liebig, J., Peeters, C., Oldham, N. J., Markstädter, C., & Hölldobler, B. (2000) Are variations in cuticular hydrocarbons of queens and workers a reliable signal of fertility in the ant Harpegnathos saltator? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 97, 41244131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linksvayer, T. A. (2010) Subsociality and the evolution of eusociality. In: Breed, M. D. & Moore, J. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior, vol. 3. Oxford: Academic Press, pp. 358362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacMahon, J. A., Mull, J. F., & Crist, T. O. (2000) Harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.): Their community and ecosystem influences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31, 265291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamsch, E. (1967) Quantitative Untersuchungen zur Regulation der Fertilität im Ameisenstaat durch Arbeiterinnen, Larven und Königin. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie, 55, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. & Szathmáry, E. (1995) The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, S. T., Neubauer, M., Sayer, E., et al. (2013) Leaf-cutting ants as ecosystem engineers: Topsoil and litter perturbations around Atta cephalotes nests reduce nutrient availability. Ecological Entomology, 38, 497504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michener, C. D. & Brothers, D. J. (1974) Were workers of eusocial Hymenoptera initially altruistic or oppressed? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 71, 671674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mintzer, A. C. (1987) Primary polygyny in the ant Atta texana: Number and weight of females and colony foundation success in the laboratory. Insectes Sociaux, 34, 108117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mlot, N. J., Tovey, C. A., & Hu, D. L. (2011) Fire ants self-assemble into waterproof rafts to survive floods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 108, 76697673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monnin, T. (2006) Chemical recognition of reproductive status in social insects. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 43, 515530.Google Scholar
Monnin, T. & Peeters, C. (1999) Dominance hierarchy and reproductive conflicts among subordinates in a monogynous queenless ant. Behavioral Ecology, 10, 323332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monnin, T., Ratnieks, F. L. W., Jones, G.R. & Beard, R. (2002) Pretender punishment induced by chemical signalling in a queenless ant. Nature, 419, 6165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreau, C. S. & Bell, C. D. (2013) Testing the museum versus cradle tropical biological diversity hypothesis: Phylogeny, diversification, and ancestral biogeographic range evolution of the ants. Evolution, 67, 22402257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreau, C. S., Bell, C. D., Vila, R., Archibald, S. B., & Pierce, N. E. (2006) Phylogeny of the ants: Diversification in the age of angiosperms. Science, 312, 101104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, L. W. (2014) The ants of remote Polynesia revisited. Insectes Sociaux, 61, 217228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, U., Mikheyev, A., Hong, E., et al. (2011) Evolution of cold-tolerant fungal symbionts permits winter fungiculture by leafcutter ants at the northern frontier of a tropical ant-fungus symbiosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 108, 40534056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueller, U. G., Gerardo, N. M., Aanen, D. K., Six, D. L., & Schultz, T. R. (2005) The evolution of agriculture in insects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 36, 563595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Münch, D., Amdam, G. V., & Wolschin, F. (2008) Ageing in a eusocial insect: Molecular and physiological characteristics of life span plasticity in the honey bee. Functional Ecology, 22, 407421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oettler, J., Schmid, V. S., Zankl, N., et al. (2013) Fermat’s principle of least time predicts refraction of ant trails at substrate borders. PLoS ONE, 8, e59739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohkawara, K., Nakayama, M., Satoh, A., Trindl, A., & Heinze, J. (2006) Clonal reproduction and genetic caste differences in a queen-polymorphic ant, Vollenhovia emeryi. Biology Letters, 2, 359363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ólafsson, E. & Richter, S. H. (1985) Húsamaurinn (Hypoponera punctatissima). Náttúrufræđingurinn, 55: 139146.Google Scholar
Parker, J. D. (2010) What are social insects telling us about aging? Myrmecological News, 13, 103110.Google Scholar
Passera, L. & Aron, S. (2005) Les Fourmis: Comportement, organisation sociale et évolution. Ottawa: CNRC·NRC.Google Scholar
Passera, L., Roncin, E., Kaufmann, B., & Keller, L. (1996) Increased soldier production in ant colonies exposed to intraspecific competition. Nature, 379, 630631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearcy, M. & Aron, S. (2006) Local resource competition and sex ratio in the ant Cataglyphis cursor. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 569574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearcy, M., Goodisman, M. A. D., & Keller, L. (2011) Sib-mating without inbreeding in the Crazy ant. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 278, 26772681.Google ScholarPubMed
Peeters, C. (1991) Ergatoid queens and intercastes in ants: Two distinct adult forms which look morphologically intermediate between workers and winged queens. Insectes Sociaux, 38, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peeters, C. (1997) Morphologically ‘primitive’ ants: Comparative review of social characters, and the importance of queen-worker dimorphism. In: Choe, J. C. & Crespi, B. J. (eds.) The Evolution of Social Behaviour in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 372391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peeters, C. & Higashi, S. (1989) Reproductive dominance controlled by mutilation in the queenless ant Diacamma australe. Naturwissenschaften, 76, 177180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peeters, C. & Ito, F. (2001) Colony dispersal and the evolution of queen morphology in social Hymenoptera. Annual Review of Entomology, 46, 601630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pie, M. R. & Tschà, M. K. (2009) The macroevolutionary dynamics of ant diversification. Evolution, 63, 30233030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinter-Wollman, N., Bala, A., Merrell, A., et al. (2013) Harvester ants use interactions to regulate forager activation and availability. Animal Behaviour, 86, 197207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pratt, S. C., Mallon, E. B., Sumpter, D. J., & Franks, N. R. (2002) Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 52, 117127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queller, D. C. (2000) Pax argentinica. Nature, 405, 519520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Queller, D. C. & Strassmann, J.E. (2013) The veil of ignorance can favour biological cooperation. Biology Letters, 9, 20130365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabeling, C. & Kronauer, D. J. C. (2013) Thelytokous parthenogenesis in eusocial Hymenoptera. Annual Review of Entomology, 58, 273292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ratnieks, F. L. W. (1988) Reproductive harmony via mutual policing by workers in eusocial Hymenoptera. The American Naturalist, 132, 217236.Google Scholar
Ratnieks, F. L. W. & Reeve, H. K. (1992) Conflict in single-queen Hymenopteran societies: The structure of conflict and processes that reduce conflict in advanced eusocial species. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 158, 3365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravary, F., Lecoutey, E., Kaminski, G., Châline, N., & Jaisson, P. (2007) Individual experience alone can generate lasting division of labor in ants. Current Biology, 17, 13081312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reber, A., Castella, G., Christe, P., & Chapuisat, M. (2008) Experimentally increased group diversity improves disease resistance in an ant species. Biology Letters, 11, 682689.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. J. H., Jackson, D. E., Holcombe, M., & Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2005) Insect communication: ‘No entry’ signal in ant foraging. Nature, 438, 442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, K. G. & Carpenter, J. M. (1991) Phylogenetic analysis and the evolution of queen number in eusocial Hymenoptera. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 4, 117130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousset, F. & Lion, S. (2011) Much ado about nothing: Nowak, et al.’s charge against inclusive fitness theory. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 24, 13861392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rüger, M.H., Fröba, J. & Foitzik, S. (2008) Larval cannibalism and worker-induced separation of larvae in Hypoponera ants: A case of conflict over caste determination? Insectes Sociaux, 55, 1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savolainen, R. & Vepsäläinen, K. (2003) Sympatric speciation through intraspecific social parasitism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 100, 71697174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savolainen, R., Vepsäläinen, K. & Wuorenrinne, H. (1989) Ant assemblages in the taiga biome: Testing the role of territorial wood ants. Oecologia, 81, 481486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlick-Steiner, B. C., Steiner, F. M., Konrad, H., et al. (2008) Specificity and transmission mosaic of ant nest-wall fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 105, 940943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schrader, L., Simola, D. F., Heinze, J., & Oettler, J. (2015) Sphingolipids, transcription factors, and conserved toolkit genes: Developmental plasticity in the ant Cardiocondyla obscurior. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 32, 14741486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schrempf, A., Heinze, J., & Cremer, S. (2005) Sexual cooperation: Mating increases longevity in ant queens. Current Biology, 15, 267270.Google ScholarPubMed
Schrempf, A., Aron, S. & Heinze, J. (2006) Sex determination and inbreeding depression in an ant with regular sib-mating. Heredity, 97, 7580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrempf, A., Cremer, S., & Heinze, J. (2011) Social influence on age and reproduction: Reduced lifespan and fecundity in multi-queen ant colonies. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 24, 14551461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultner, E., Gardner, A., Karhunen, M., & Helanterä, H. (2014) Ant larvae as players in social conflict: Relatedness and individual identity mediate cannibalism intensity. The American Naturalist, 184, E161E174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwander, T., Lo, N., Beekman, M., Oldroyd, B. P., & Keller, L. (2010) Nature versus nurture in social insect caste differentiation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25, 275282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, J., Budsberg, K., Suen, G., et al. (2010) Microbial community structure of leaf-cutter ant fungus gardens and refuse dumps. PLoS ONE, 5, e9922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seal, J. N. (2009) Scaling of body weight and fat content in fungus-gardening ant queens: Does this explain why leaf-cutting ants found claustrally? Insectes Sociaux, 56, 135141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seal, J. N. & Tschinkel, W. R. (2006) Colony productivity of the fungus-gardening ant, Trachymyrmex septentrionalis McCook, in a Florida pine forest (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 99, 673682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seal, J. N., Schiøtt, M. & Mueller, U. G. (2014) Ant-fungal species combinations engineer physiological activity of fungus gardens. Journal of Experimental Biology 217, 25402547.Google Scholar
Sherman, P. W., Seeley, T. D., & Reeve, H. K. (1988) Parasites, pathogens, and polyandry in social Hymenoptera. The American Naturalist, 131, 602610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, M. & Boomsma, J. J. (2015) Policing and punishment across the domains of social evolution. Oikos, 124, 971982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. A., Hölldobler, B., & Liebig, J. (2009) Cuticular hydrocarbons reliably identify cheaters and allow enforcement of altruism in a social insect. Current Biology, 19, 7881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, C. (2006) Steps toward a general theory of the colony cycle in social insects. In: Kipyatkov, V. (ed.) Life Cycles in Social Insects: Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press, pp. 120.Google Scholar
Stille, M. (1996) Queen/worker thorax volume ratios and nest-founding strategies in ants. Oecologia, 105, 8792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoll, S., Gadau, J., Gross, R., & Feldhaar, H. (2007) Bacterial microbiota associated with ants of the genus Tetraponera. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 90, 399412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroeymeyt, N., Brunner, E., & Heinze, J. (2007) “Selfish worker policing” controls reproduction in a Temnothorax ant. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61, 14491457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundström, L., Chapuisat, M., & Keller, L. (1996) Conditional manipulation of sex ratios by ant workers: A test of kin selection theory. Science, 274, 993995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinaut, A. & Heinze, J. (1992) Wing reduction in ant queens from arid habitats Naturwissenschaften, 79, 8485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toth, A. L. & Robinson, G. E. (2007) Evo-devo and the evolution of social behaviour. Trends in Genetics, 23, 334341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R. L. & Hare, H. (1976) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of social insects. Science, 191, 249263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trunzer, B., Heinze, J., & Hölldobler, B. (1998) Cooperative colony founding and experimental primary polygyny in the ponerine ant Pachycondyla villosa. Insectes Sociaux, 45, 267276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschinkel, W. R. (1996) A newly-discovered mode of colony founding among fire ants. Insectes Sociaux, 43, 267276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschinkel, W. R. (1999) Sociometry and sociogenesis of colony-level attributes of the Florida harvester ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 92, 8089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsuji, K. (1988) Obligate parthenogenesis and reproductive division of labor in the Japanese queenless ant Pristomyrmex pungens. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 23, 247255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsuji, K., Nakata, K. & Heinze, J. (1996) Lifespan and reproduction in a queenless ant. Naturwissenschaften, 83, 577578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsutsui, N. D. & Suarez, A. V. (2003) The colony structure and population biology of invasive ants. Conservation Biology, 17, 4858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsutsui, N. D., Suarez, A. V., Holway, D. A., & Case, T. J. (2000) Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 97, 59485953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Wilgenburg, E., Driessen, G., & Beukeboom, L. W. (2006) Single locus complementary sex determination in Hymenoptera: An “unintelligent” design. Frontiers in Zoology, 3, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Zweden, J. S., Brask, J. B., Christensen, J. H., et al. (2010) Blending of heritable recognition cues among ant nestmates creates distinct colony gestalt odours but prevents within-colony nepotism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23, 14891508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Wyschetzki, K., Rueppell, O., Oettler, J., & Heinze, J. (2015) Transcriptomic signatures mirror the lack of the fecundity/longevity trade-off in ant queens. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 32, 31733185.Google ScholarPubMed
Wenseleers, T. & Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2006a) Enforced altruism in insect societies. Nature, 444, 50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wenseleers, T. & Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2006b) Comparative analysis of worker reproduction and policing in eusocial Hymenoptera supports relatedness theory. The American Naturalist, 168, E163E179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wetterer, J. K., Espadaler, X., & Ashmole, P. (2007) Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of the South Atlantic islands of Ascension Island, St Helena, and Tristan da Cunha. Myrmecological News, 10, 2937.Google Scholar
Whitcomb, W. H., Bhatkar, A., & Nickerson, J. C. (1973) Predators of Solenopsis invicta queens prior to successful colony establishment. Environmental Entomology, 2, 11011103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1971) The Insect Societies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1983) Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta III. Ergonomic resiliency in foraging by A. cephalotes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 14, 4754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (2012) The Social Conquest of Earth. New York, NY: Liveright Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. & Hölldobler, B. (1980) Sex differences in cooperative silk-spinning by weaver ant larvae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 77, 23432347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, E. O. & Hölldobler, B. (2005) The rise of the ants: A phylogenetic and ecological explanation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102, 74117414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witte, V. & Maschwitz, U. (2008) Mushroom harvesting ants in the tropical rain forest. Naturwissenschaften, 95, 10491054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamauchi, K., Oguchi, S., Nakamura, Y., et al. (2001) Mating behavior of dimorphic reproductives of the ponerine ant, Hypoponera nubatama. Insectes Sociaux, 48, 8387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamauchi, K., Ishida, Y., Hashim, R. & Heinze, J. (2006) Queen–queen competition by precocious male production in multiqueen ant colonies. Current Biology, 16, 24242427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yanoviak, S. P., Dudley, R., & Kaspari, M. (2005) Directed aerial descent in canopy ants. Nature, 433, 624626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×