Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T11:45:56.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Social Antecedents and Consequences of Behavioral Synchrony

from Part III - Thinking, Perceiving and Acting with Others

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2016

By
Daniël Lakens ,
Thomas Schubert  and
Maria-Paola Paladino
Edited by
Sukhvinder S. Obhi  and
Emily S. Cross
Sukhvinder S. Obhi
Affiliation:
McMaster University, Ontario
Emily S. Cross
Affiliation:
Bangor University
Get access

Summary

Abstract

Behavioral synchronization is one mechanism through which people coordinate their behavior in social interactions. Researchers from a wide range of scientific disciplines have examined the social antecedents and consequences of behavioral synchrony. At the core of this research lies the double assumption that people spontaneously synchronize their behavior during social interactions, and that synchronized movement rhythms transform individuals into a social unit. Recent experimental research has started to offer converging support for these theoretical ideas. In the present chapter, we will first define behavioral synchrony and review early research on movement synchrony. Subsequently, we discuss how behavioral synchrony is measured using frame-by-frame analysis, judgments of synchrony by observers, movement tracking devices or automatic motion analysis. We then provide an overview of recent studies on how synchrony emerges, focusing both on a dynamic systems perspective, as a cognitive perspective based on common coding theory. Finally, we review research on the consequences of behavioral synchrony, on the affective, behavioral and cognitive consequences of moving in synchrony. The research discussed in this chapter points towards the fundamental role synchrony plays in social interaction. The tendency to synchronize, together with the emergence of a social unit when individuals move in synchrony, seems to indicate that people have a predisposition to socially connect to others through mutual adaptation of behavioral rhythms.

Type
Chapter
Information
Shared Representations
Sensorimotor Foundations of Social Life
 , pp. 254 - 279
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aschersleben, G. (2002). Temporal control of movements in sensorimotor synchronization. Brain and Cognition, 48(1), 66–79. doi: 10.1006/brcg.2001.1304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernieri, F. J. (1988). Coordinated movement and rapport in teacher–student interactions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12(2), 120–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernieri, F. J., Davis, J. M., Rosenthal, R., & Knee, C. R. (1994). Interactional synchrony and rapport: Measuring synchrony in displays devoid of sound and facial affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(3), 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernieri, F. J., Gillis, J. S., Davis, J. M., & Grahe, J. E. (1996). Dyad rapport and the accuracy of its judgment across situations: A lens model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 110–129. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.1.110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernieri, F. J., Reznick, J. S., & Rosenthal, R. (1988). Synchrony, pseudosynchrony, and dissynchrony: Measuring the entrainment process in mother–infant interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernieri, F. J., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Interpersonal coordination: Behavior matching and interactional synchrony. In Feldman, R. S. & Rime, B. (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 401–432.Google Scholar
Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and context: Essays in body motion communication. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. D. (1998). Rubber hand ‘feels’ what eyes see. Nature, 391(6669), 756–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouquet, C. A., Gaurier, V., Shipley, T., Toussaint, L., & Blandin, Y. (2007). Influence of the perception of biological or non-biological motion on movement execution. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(5), 519–530. doi: 10.1080/02640410600946803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgoon, J. K., Stern, L. A., & Dillman, L. (1995). Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadic interaction patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappella, J. N. (1996). Dynamic coordination of vocal and kinesic behavior in dyadic interaction: Methods, problems, and interpersonal outcomes. In Watt, J. H. & VanLear, C. A. (Eds.), Dynamic patterns in communication processes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 353–386.Google Scholar
Cappella, J. N. (1997). Behavioral and judged coordination in adult informal social interactions: Vocal and kinesic indicators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaminade, T., Franklin, D. W., Oztop, E., & Cheng, G. (2005). Motor interference between humans and humanoid robots: Effect of biological and artificial motion. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Development and Learning, 96–101. doi: 10.1109/DEVLRN.2005.1490951.Google Scholar
Chapple, C. C. (1940). A cabinet cubicle for infants, combining isolation with control of temperature and humidity. Journal of Pediatrics, 16(2), 215–219. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(40)80122-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chartrand, T. L., & Lakin, J. L. (2013). The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 285–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Condon, W. S. (1980). The relation of interactional synchrony to cognitive and emotional processes. In Key, M. R. (Ed.), The relation of verbal and nonverbal behavior. The Hague: Mouton, 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condon, W. S. (1982). Cultural microrhythms. In Davis, M. (Ed.), Interaction rhythms: Periodicity in communicative behavior. New York: Human Sciences Press, 53–76.Google Scholar
Condon, W. S., & Ogston, W. D. (1966). Sound film analysis of normal and pathological behavior patterns. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 143(4), 338–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Condon, W. S., & Sander, L. W. (1974). Neonate movement is synchronized with adult speech: Interactional participation and language acquisition. Science, 183(4120), 99–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cross, E. S., Hamilton, A. F. D. C., Kraemer, D. J., Kelley, W. M., & Grafton, S. T. (2009). Dissociable substrates for body motion and physical experience in the human action observation network. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30(7), 1383–1392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cummins, F. (2013). Social cognition is not a special case, and the dark matter is more extensive than recognized. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 415–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, M. E. (Ed.) (1982). Interaction rhythms: Periodicity in communicative behavior. New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Delaherche, E., Chetouani, M., Mahdhaoui, A., Saint-Georges, C., Viaux, S., & Cohen, D. (2012). Interpersonal synchrony: A survey of evaluation methods across disciplines. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3(3), 349–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demos, A. P., Chaffin, R., Begosh, K. T., Daniels, J. R., & Marsh, K. L. (2012). Rocking to the beat: Effects of music and partner’s movements on spontaneous interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 49–53. doi: 10.1037/a0023843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T. M. H., Schöner, G., & Gielen, C. C. A. M. (1994a). Temporal stability of the action–perception cycle for postural control in a moving visual environment. Experimental Brain Research, 97(3), 477–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T. M. H., Schöner, G., Giese, M. A., & Gielen, C. C. A. M. (1994b). Frequency dependence of the action–perception cycle for postural control in a moving visual environment: Relative phase dynamics. Biological Cybernetics, 71(6), 489–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumas, G., Nadel, J., Soussignan, R., Martinerie, J., & Garnero, L. (2010). Inter-brain synchronization during social interaction. PloS One, 5(8), e12166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durkheim, E. ([1915] 1965). The elementary forms of the religious life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, R. (2007). On the origins of background emotions: From affect synchrony to symbolic expression. Emotion, 7(3), 601–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R., Magori-Cohen, R., Galili, G., Singer, M., & Louzoun, Y. (2011). Mother and infant coordinate heart rhythms through episodes of interaction synchrony. Infant Behavior and Development, 34(4), 569–577. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.06.008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, A. P. (2004). Four modes of constituting relationships: Consubstantial assimilation; space, magnitude, time, and force; concrete procedures; abstract symbolism. In Haslam, N. (Ed.), Relational models theory: A contemporary overview. Abingdon: Psychology Press, 61–146.Google Scholar
Freeman, W. (2000). A neurobiological role of music in social bonding. In Merker, B., Wallin, N. L., & Brown, S. (Eds.), The origins of music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 411–424.Google Scholar
Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(9), 396–403. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grammer, K., Honda, R., Schmitt, A., & Jütte, A. (1999). Fuzziness of nonverbal courtship communication unblurred by motion energy detection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 487–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grammer, K., Kruck, K. B., & Magnusson, M. S. (1998). The courtship dance: Patterns of nonverbal synchronization in opposite-sex encounters. Journal of Nonverbal behavior, 22(1), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, M. D. (1994). Synchronous and alternating choruses in insects and anurans: Common mechanisms and diverse functions. American Zoologist, 34(6), 605–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J., Seder, J., & Kesebir, S. (2008). Hive psychology, happiness, and public policy. Journal of Legal Studies, 37(2), 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haken, H., Kelso, J. A. S., & Bunz, H. (1985). A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biological Cybernetics, 51(5), 347–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 849–878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hove, M. J., & Risen, J. L. (2009). It’s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27(6), 949–960. doi: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issartel, J., Marin, L., & Cadopi, M. (2007). Unintended interpersonal co-ordination: ‘Can we march to the beat of our own drum?’ Neuroscience Letters, 411(3), 174–179. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.09.086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S., Brady, N., Cummins, F., & Monaghan, K. (2007). Interaction effects in simultaneous motor control and movement perception tasks. Artificial Intelligence Review, 26(1–2), 141–154. doi: 10.1007/s10462-007-9035-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (1970). Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examples described. Acta Psychologica, 32(2), 101–125. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(70)90094–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J., & Frith, C. D. (2007). Predictive coding: An account of the mirror neuron system. Cognitive Processing, 8(3), 159–166. doi: 10.1007/s10339-007-0170-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kilner, J. M., Paulignan, Y., & Blakemore, S. J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13(6), 522–525. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00165-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirschner, S., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Joint drumming: Social context facilitates synchronization in preschool children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(3), 299–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.07.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleinspehn-Ammerlahn, A., Riediger, M., Schmiedek, F., von Oertzen, T., Li, S.-C., & Lindenberger, U. (2011). Dyadic drumming across the lifespan reveals a zone of proximal development in children. Developmental Psychology, 47(3), 632–644. doi: 10.1037/a0021818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kokal, I., Engel, A., Kirschner, S., & Keysers, C. (2011). Synchronized drumming enhances activity in the caudate and facilitates prosocial commitment – if the rhythm comes easy. PLos One, 6(11), e27272. doi: 27210.21371/journal.pone.0027272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konvalinka, I., Vuust, P., Roepstorff, A., & Frith, C. D. (2010). Follow you, follow me: Continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tapping. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11), 2220–2230. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.497843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, M. (2005). Four themes in youth work practice. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 21–29. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupferberg, A., Glasauer, S., Huber, M., Rickert, M., Knoll, A., & Brandt, T. (2011). Biological movement increases acceptance of humanoid robots as human partners in motor interaction. AI and Society, 26(4), 339–345. doi: 10.1007/s00146-010-0314-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurzban, R. (2001). The social psychophysics of cooperation: Nonverbal communication in a public goods game. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 25(4), 241–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFrance, M. (1985). Posture mirroring and intergroup orientation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(2), 207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFrance, M. (1990). The trouble with rapport. Psychological Inquiry, 1(4), 318–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakens, D. (2010). Movement synchrony and perceived entitativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 701–708. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakens, D., & Stel, M. (2011). If they move in sync, they must feel in sync: Movement synchrony leads to attributions of rapport and entitativity. Social Cognition, 29(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Launay, J., Dean, R. T., & Bailes, F. (2013). Synchronization can influence trust following virtual interaction. Experimental Psychology, 60(1), 53–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux, P. (2012). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1404–1426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lumsden, J., Miles, L. K., Richardson, M. J., Smith, C. A., & Macrae, C. N. (2012). Who syncs? Social motives and interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 746–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macrae, C. N., Duffy, O. K., Miles, L. K., & Lawrence, J. (2008). A case of hand-waving: Action synchrony and person perception. Cognition, 109(1), 152–156. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marin, L., Issartel, J., & Chaminade, T. (2009). Interpersonal motor coordination: From human–human to human–robot interactions. Interaction Studies, 10(3), 479–504. doi: 10.1075/is.10.3.09mar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, K. L., Johnston, L., Richardson, M. J., & Schmidt, R. C. (2009a). Toward a radically embodied, embedded social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 320–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, K. L., Richardson, M. J., Baron, R. M., & Schmidt, R. C. (2006). Contrasting approaches to perceiving and acting with others. Ecological Psychology, 18(1), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, K. L., Richardson, M. J., & Schmidt, R. C. (2009b). Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 320–339. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01022.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masumoto, J., & Inui, N. (2013). Two heads are better than one: Both complementary and synchronous strategies facilitate joint action. Journal of Neurophysiology, 109(5), 1307–1314. doi: 10.1152/jn.00776.2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNeill, W. H. (1995). Keeping together in time: Dance and drill in human history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McPhail, C., & Wohlstein, R. T. (1986). Collective locomotion as collective behavior. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 447–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merker, B. H., Madison, G. S., & Eckerdal, P. (2009). On the role and origin of isochrony in human rhythmic entrainment. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 45(1), 4–17. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.06.011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miall, R. C. (2003). Connecting mirror neurons and forward models. Neuroreport, 14(17), 2135–2137. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000098751.87269.77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, L. K., Lumsden, J., Richardson, M. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2011). Do birds of a feather move together? Group membership and behavioral synchrony. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 495–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, L. K., Nind, L. K., and Macrae, C. N. (2009). The rhythm of rapport: Interpersonal synchrony and social perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 585–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Brechet, Y., Vicsek, T., & Barabási, A. L. (2000). The sound of many hands clapping: Tumultuous applause can transform itself into waves of synchronized clapping. Nature, 403(6772), 849–850. doi: 10.1038/35002660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nessler, J. A., Kephart, G., Cowell, J., & De Leone, C. J. (2011). Varying treadmill speed and inclination affects spontaneous synchronization when two individuals walk side by side. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 27(4), 322–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newtson, D., Hairfield, J., Bloomingdale, J., & Cutino, S. (1987). The structure of action and interaction. Social Cognition, 5(3), 191–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obhi, S. S., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving together: Toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3), 329–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oullier, O., de Guzman, G. C., Jantzen, K. J., Lagarde, J., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2008). Social coordination dynamics: Measuring human bonding. Social Neuroscience, 3(2), 178–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oztop, E., Franklin, D. W., & Chaminade, T. (2005). Human–humanoid interaction: Is a humanoid robot perceived as a human? International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 2(4), 537–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paladino, M.-P., Mazzurega, M., Pavani, F., & Schubert, T. W. (2010). Synchronous multisensory stimulation blurs self–other boundaries. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1202–1207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, A. D., Iversen, J. R., Bregman, M. R., & Schulz, I. (2009). Experimental evidence for synchronization to a musical beat in a nonhuman animal. Current Biology, 19(10), 827–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, A., & Dale, R. (2013a). Frame-differencing methods for measuring bodily synchrony in conversation. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 329–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paxton, A., (2013b). Argument disrupts interpersonal synchrony. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(11), 2092–2102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prinz, W. (1990). A common-coding approach to perception and action. In Neumann, O. & Prinz, W. (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 167–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramseyer, F., & Tschacher, W. (2011). Nonverbal synchrony in psychotherapy: Coordinated body movement reflects relationship quality and outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(3), 284–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reddish, P., Fischer, R., & Bulbulia, J. (2013). Let’s dance together: Synchrony, shared intentionality and cooperation. PloS One, 8(8), e71182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Repp, B. H. (2006). Rate limits of sensorimotor synchronization. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2(2), 163–181. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0053-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repp, B. H., & Penel, A. (2004). Rhythmic movement is attracted more strongly to auditory than to visual rhythms. Psychological Research, 68(4), 252–270. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0143-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Repp, B. H., & Su, Y.-H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006–2012). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20(3), 403–452. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0371-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, M. J., Campbell, W. L., & Schmidt, R. C. (2009). Movement interference during action observation as emergent coordination. Neuroscience Letters, 449(2), 117–122. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.10.092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., Isenhower, R. W., Goodman, J. R. L., & Schmidt, R. C. (2007). Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science, 26(6), 867–891. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.07.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., & Schmidt, R. C. (2005). Effects of visual and verbal interaction on unintentional interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 62–79. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.62.Google ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, R. C., Bienvenu, M., Fitzpatrick, P. A., & Amazeen, P. G. (1998). A comparison of intra- and interpersonal interlimb coordination: Coordination breakdowns and coupling strength. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 884–900.Google ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, R. C., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1990). Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(2), 227–247.Google ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, R. C., Fitzpatrick, P., Caron, R., and Mergeche, J. (2011). Understanding social motor coordination. Human Movement Science, 30(5), 834–845. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2010.05.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, R. C., & O’Brien, B. (1997). Evaluating the dynamics of unintended interpersonal coordination. Ecological Psychology, 9(3), 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. C., Richardson, M. J., Arsenault, C., & Galantucci, B. (2007). Visual tracking and entrainment to an environmental rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 860–870. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.860.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. C., & Turvey, M. T. (1994). Phase-entrainment dynamics of visually coupled rhythmic movements. Biological Cybernetics, 70(4), 369–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 353–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01024.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semin, G. R., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). Grounding social cognition: Synchronization, entrainment and coordination. In Semin, G. R. & Smith, E. R. (Eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches. New York: Cambridge University Press, 119–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shockley, K., Baker, A. A., Richardson, M. J., & Fowler, C. A. (2007). Articulatory constraints on interpersonal postural coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(1), 201–208. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.1.201.Google ScholarPubMed
Shockley, K., Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2009). Conversation and coordinative structures. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 305–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01021.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shockley, K., Santana, M. V., & Fowler, C. A. (2003). Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 326–332. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.326.Google ScholarPubMed
Sommerville, J. A., & Decety, J. (2006). Weaving the fabric of social interaction: Articulating developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience in the domain of motor cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(2), 179–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanley, J., Gowen, E., & Miall, R. C. (2007). Effects of agency on movement interference during observation of a moving dot stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 915–926. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.915.Google Scholar
Stel, M., & Vonk, R. (2010). Mimicry in social interaction: Benefits for mimickers, mimickees, and their interaction. British Journal of Psychology, 101(2), 311–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strogatz, S. H., Abrams, D. A., McRobie, A., Eckhardt, B., & Ott, E. (2005). Theoretical mechanics: Crowd synchrony on the Millennium Bridge. Nature, 438(7064), 43–44. doi: 10.1038/43843a.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Styns, F., van Noorden, L., Moelants, D., & Leman, M. (2007). Walking on music. Human Movement Science, 26(5), 769–785. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.07.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Temprado, J.-J. (2004). Attentional load associated with performing and stabilizing a between-persons coordination of rhythmic limb movements. Acta Psychologica, 115(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.09.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry, 1(4), 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tognoli, E., Lagarde, J., DeGuzman, G. C., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2007). The phi complex as a neuromarker of human social coordination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(19), 8190–8195. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611453104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsakiris, M. (2008). Looking for myself: Current multisensory input alters self-face recognition. PloS One, 3(12), e4040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulzen, N. R., Lamoth, C. J. C., Daffertshofer, A., Semin, G. R., & Beek, P. J. (2008). Characteristics of instructed and uninstructed interpersonal coordination while walking side-by-side. Neuroscience Letters, 432(2), 88–93. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.11.070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vacharkulksemsuk, T., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2012). Strangers in sync: Achieving embodied rapport through shared movements. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 399–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2011). Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion. Emotion, 11(2), 262–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valdesolo, P., Ouyang, J., & DeSteno, D. A. (2010). The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(4), 693–695. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., et al. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure–ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217. doi: 10.1037/a0029333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watanabe, K. (2008). Behavioral speed contagion: Automatic modulation of movement timing by observation of body movements. Cognition, 106(3), 1514–1524. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiltermuth, S. S. (2012). Synchronous activity boosts compliance with requests to aggress. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 453–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiltermuth, S. S., & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20(1), 1–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02253.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 593–602. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×