Book contents
- The Indo-European Puzzle Revisited
- The Indo-European Puzzle Revisited
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Early Indo-European and the Origin of Pastoralism
- Part II Migratory Processes and Linguistic Dispersals between Yamnaya and the Corded Ware
- Part III The Cultural and Linguistic Significance of Bell Beakers along the Atlantic Fringe
- Part IV The Bronze Age Chariot and Wool Horizons
- Part V Kinship Systems, Marriage, Fosterage, Free, and Unfree
- 19 Mobility, Kinship, and Marriage in Indo-European Society
- 20 Marriage Strategies and Fosterage among the Indo-Europeans: A Linguistic Perspective
- 21 Fostering Women and Mobile Children in Final Neolithic and Early Bronze Age Central Europe
- 22 Hiding in Plain Sight? The Enigma of the Linguistic Remains of Prehistoric Slavery
- Concluding Reflections
- Index
- References
20 - Marriage Strategies and Fosterage among the Indo-Europeans: A Linguistic Perspective
from Part V - Kinship Systems, Marriage, Fosterage, Free, and Unfree
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 April 2023
Book contents
- The Indo-European Puzzle Revisited
- The Indo-European Puzzle Revisited
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Early Indo-European and the Origin of Pastoralism
- Part II Migratory Processes and Linguistic Dispersals between Yamnaya and the Corded Ware
- Part III The Cultural and Linguistic Significance of Bell Beakers along the Atlantic Fringe
- Part IV The Bronze Age Chariot and Wool Horizons
- Part V Kinship Systems, Marriage, Fosterage, Free, and Unfree
- 19 Mobility, Kinship, and Marriage in Indo-European Society
- 20 Marriage Strategies and Fosterage among the Indo-Europeans: A Linguistic Perspective
- 21 Fostering Women and Mobile Children in Final Neolithic and Early Bronze Age Central Europe
- 22 Hiding in Plain Sight? The Enigma of the Linguistic Remains of Prehistoric Slavery
- Concluding Reflections
- Index
- References
Summary
In recent years, it has become increasingly clear that a combination of genetics, archaeology, and historical-comparative linguistics is the only sensible way to reach a deeper and more subtle understanding of the Indo-European question. By now, there is practically general agreement that at the very least, “Indo-Tocharian,”1 defined as the predecessor of all branches of the Indo-European family with the exception of Anatolian, originated in the Pontic–Caspian steppe. The speakers of this common language have been archaeologically connected with the Yamnaya horizon, later continued in northern Europe as the Corded Ware culture.2
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Indo-European Puzzle RevisitedIntegrating Archaeology, Genetics, and Linguistics, pp. 296 - 302Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Allentoft, Morten E., Sikora, M., Sjögren, K. G., Rasmussen, S., Stenderup, J., Damgaard, P. B., et al. 2015. Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia. Nature 522: 167–173.Google Scholar
Anderson, Siwan. 2008. The economics of dowry and brideprice. Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(4): 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anthony, David W., & Brown, Dorcas R.. 2017. Molecular archaeology and Indo-European linguistics. In: Simmelkjær, Bjarne, Hansen, Sandgaard, et al. (ed.), Usque ad radices. Indo-European Studies in honour of Birgit Anette Olsen (Copenhagen Studies in Indo-European 8), 25–54. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Beekes, Robert. 2010. Etymological dictionary of Greek. 2 vols. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. 1969. Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes. 1. Économie, parenté, societé. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Bjørn, Rasmus Gudmundsen. 2017. Foreign elements in the Proto-Indo-European vocabulary. Master’s thesis, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Bremmer, Jan. 1976. Avunculate and fosterage. Journal of Indo-European Studies 4(1): 65–78.Google Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling. 1988 [1909]. A dictionary of selected synonyms in the principal Indo-European languages. A contribution to the history of ideas. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press. First published 1909.Google Scholar
Clackson, James. 2007. Indo-European linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold. 1889. Die indogermanischen Verwandtschaftsnamen: ein Beitrag zur vergleichenden Altertumskunde (Abhandlung der philologisch-historischen Classe der Königl. Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaft, Band IX No. V). Leipzig: Hirtel.Google Scholar
Frei, Karin Margarita. 2015. Tracing the dynamic life story of a Bronze Age Female. Scientific Reports 5: 10431.Google Scholar
Frisk, Hjalmar. 1960–72. Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch 3 vols. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Gamkrelidze, Thomas V., & Ivanov, Vjačeslav V.. 1995. Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans: A reconstruction and historical analysis of a proto-language and a proto-culture. Vol 1. The text (Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 80). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haak, Wolfgang et. al. 2015. Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe. Nature 522 (7555): 207–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IEW = Pokorny, Julius. 1959. Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Janda, Michael. 2020. Wooing in Indo-European culture. In: Whitehead, Benedicte Nielsen, Olsen, Birgit Anette, & Jacquet, Janus Bahs (ed.), Kin, clan and community in Indo-European Society (Copenhagen Studies in Indo-European 9), 499–514. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Knipper, Corina, et al. 2017. Female exogamy and gene pole diversification at the transition from the Final Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age in central Europe. PNAS 114(38): 10083–10088.Google Scholar
Koivulehto, Jorma. 1994. Indogermanisch–Uralisch: Lehnbeziehungen der (auch) Urverwandtschaft. In: Sternemann, Reinhard (ed.), Bopp-Symposium 1992 der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Akten der Konferenz vom 24. 3.–26.3. 1992 aus Anlaß von Franz Bopps zweihundertjährigem Geburtstag am 14. 9. 1991, 132–48. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Kölligan, Daniel. 2014. Indogermanisch und Armenisch. Studien zur historischen Grammatik des Klassisch-Armenischen. Habilitationsschrift, Institut für Linguistik, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Kristian et al. 2017. Re-theorising mobility and the formation of culture and language among the Corded Ware Culture in Europe. Antiquity 91(353): 334–347.Google Scholar
Lamberterie, Charles de. 2018. Dérivé ou compose? L’adjectif ałkcat “pauvre” de l’arménien classique. Handout from the colloquium Dérivation nominale et innovations dans les langues indo-européennes anciennes, Université de Rouen, October 2018.Google Scholar
Lansing, J. Stephen, et al. 2017. Kinship structures create persistent channels for language transmission.Google Scholar
Mallory, James P., & Adams, Douglas Quentin. 1997. Encyclopedia of Indo-European culture. London & Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn.Google Scholar
Mittnik, Alissa. 2019. Kinship-based social inequality in Bronze Age Europe. Science 366(6466): 731–734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgenstierne, Georg. 1927. An etymological dictionary of Pashto (Skrifter utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo, II, Hist-Filos. Klasse 3). Oslo: Dybwad.Google Scholar
Olander, Thomas. 2019. Indo-European cladistic nomenclature. Indogermanische Forschungen 124: 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Birgit Anette. 2012. A note on Indo-European in-laws. In Cooper, Adam I., Rau, Jeremy, & Weiss, Michael (ed.), Multi nominis grammaticus: Studies in Classical and Indo-European linguistics in honor of Alan J. Nussbaum, on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday, 213–216. Ann Arbor (MI): Beech Stave Press.Google Scholar
Olsen, Birgit Anette. 2019. Aspects of family structure among the Indo-Europeans. In: Olsen, Birgit Anette, Olander, Thomas, & Kristiansen, Kristian (ed.), Tracing the Indo-Europeans. New evidence from archaeology and historical linguistics, 145–163. Oxford: Oxbow Press.Google Scholar
Olsen, Birgit Anette. 2020. Kin, clan and community in Proto-Indo-European. In: Whitehead, Benedicte Nielsen, Olsen, Birgit Anette, & Jacquet, Janus Bahs (ed.), Kin, clan and community in Indo-European Society (Copenhagen Studies in Indo-European 9), 39–180. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Persson, Charlotte Price. 2017. Another female Bronze Age icon is now known to have travelled across Europe. Science Nordic, April 10, 2017.Google Scholar
Pinault, Georges-Jean. 2013. The lady (almost) vanishes. In: Cooper, Adam I., Rau, Jeremy, & Weiss, Michael (ed.), Multi nominis grammaticus: Studies in Classical and Indo-European linguistics in honor of Alan J. Nussbaum, on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday, 240–254. Ann Arbor (MI): Beech Stave.Google Scholar
Pinault, Georges-Jean. 2017. The self-representation of the Indo-European society through kinship terms. In: Bichlmeier, Harald & Opferman, Andreas (ed.), Das Menschenbild bei den Indogermanern, 81–112. Hamburg: Baar.Google Scholar
Puhvel, Jaan. 1991. Hittite etymological dictionary. Vol. 3. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, S., et al. 2015. Early divergent strains of Yersenia pestis in Eurasia 5,000 years ago. Cell 163(3): 571–82.Google Scholar
Tremblay, Xavier. 2003. La déclinaison des noms de parenté indo-européens en -ter- (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 106). Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar