Anthony, David W. & Brown, Dorcas R.. 2017. The dogs of war: A Bronze Age initiation ritual in the Russian steppes. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 48: 134–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barlau, Stephen B. 1976. An outline of Germanic kinship. Journal of Indo-European Linguistics 4: 97–129.Google Scholar

Beekes, Robert S. P. 1976. Uncle and nephew. Journal of Indo-European Linguistics 4: 43–63.Google Scholar

Beekes, Robert S. P. 1992. “Widow.” Historische Sprachforschung 105: 171–188.Google Scholar

Beekes, Robert S. P. 2010. Etymological dictionary of Greek. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Benveniste, Émile. 1969. Le Vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes. Tome I : Économie, parenté, société. Tome II : Pouvoir, droit, religion. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

Bremmer, Jan. 1976. Avunculate and fosterage. Journal of Indo-European Linguistics 4: 65–78.Google Scholar

Damgaard, P. de B. et al. 2018. The first horse herders and the impact of Early Bronze Age steppe expansions into Asia. Science 360: 6396.Google Scholar

Delbrück, Berthold. 1889. Die indogermanischen Verwandtschaftsnamen: Ein Beitrag zur vergleichenden Altertumskunde. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften 11, 380–606.Google Scholar

Falk, Harry. 1986. Bruderschaft und Würfelspiel. Untersuchungen zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des vedischen Opfers. Freiburg: Hedwig Falk.Google Scholar

Falk, Harry. 1994. Das Reitpferd im vedischen Indien. In: Hänsel, Bernhard & Zimmer, Stefan (ed.), Die Indogermanen und das Pferd. Akten des internationalen interdisziplinären Kolloquiums. Freie Universität Berlin, 1.–3. Juli 1992, 91–101. Budapest: Archaeolingua.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Paul. 1966. Proto-Indo-European kinship. Ethnology 5(1): 1–36.Google Scholar

Friedrich, Paul. 1980. Review of Szemerényi 1977. Language 56: 186–192.Google Scholar

García Ramón, José Luis. 1996 Lat. auēre “desear,” (ad)iuuāre “ayudar” e IE *h₂eu̯h₁- “dar preferencia, apreciar.” In: Bammesberger, Alfred & Heberlein, Friedrich (ed.), Akten des VIII. internationalen Kolloquiums zur lateinischen Linguistik, 32–49. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Gates, Henry Phelps. 1971. The kinship terminology of Homeric Greek. Supplement. International Journal of American Linguistics 37(4).Google Scholar

Goedegebuure, Petra. 2004. Troonsopvolging in het Oud-Hethitische Rijk: Patrilineair, matrilineair of avunkulair? Phoenix 50(1):5–21.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Amy, et al. 2017. Ancient X chromosomes reveal contrasting sex bias in Neolithic and Bronze Age Eurasian migrations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(10): 2657–2662.Google Scholar

Gräslund, Anne-Sofie. 2004. Dogs in graves: A question of symbolism? In: Frizell, Barbro Santillo (ed.), Pecus: Man and animal in antiquity, 171–180. Rome: Swedish Institute.Google Scholar

Greene, David H. 1998 Language and history in the early Germanic world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hettrich, Heinrich. 1985. Indo-European kinship terminology in linguistics and anthropology. Anthropological Linguistics 27(4): 453–480.Google Scholar

Juras, Anna, et al. 2018 Mitochondrial genomes reveal an east to west cline of steppe ancestry in Corded Ware populations. Scientific Reports 8: 11603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kershaw, Kris. 2000. The one-eyed god: Odin and the (Indo-)Germanic Männerbünde. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar

Kloekhorst, Alwin. 2008. Etymological dictionary of the Hittite inherited lexicon. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Knipper, Corina, et al. 2017. Female exogamy and gene pool diversification at the transition from the Final Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age in central Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(38): 10083–10088.Google Scholar

Kristiansen, Kristian, et al. 2017 Re-theorising mobility and the formation of culture and language among the Corded Ware Culture in Europe. Antiquity 91(356): 334–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lansing, J. Stephen, et al. 2017. Kinship structures create persistent channels for language transmission. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(49): 12910-12915.Google Scholar

Lubotsky, Alexander. 2001. The Indo-Iranian substratum. In: Carpelan, Christian, Parpola, Asko, & Koskikallio, Petteri (ed.), Early contacts between Uralic and Indo-European: Linguistic and archaeological considerations. Papers presented at an international symposium held at the Tvärminne Research Station of the University of Helsinki 8–10 January 1999, 301–317. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar

Mallory, James P. 1998. A European perspective on Indo-Europeans in Asia. In: Mair, V. H. (ed.), The Bronze Age and Early Iron Age peoples of eastern Central Asia, 175–201. Washington, DC & Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Man & University of Pennsylvania Museum.Google Scholar

Mallory, James P., & Adams, Douglas Q. (ed.). 1997. Encyclopedia of Indo-European culture. London: Fitzroy Dearborn.Google Scholar

Mallory, James P., & Adams, Douglas Q.. 2006. The Oxford introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McCone, Kim R. 1987. Hund, Wolf und Krieger bei den Indogermanen. In: Meid, Wolfgang (ed.), Studien zum indogermanischen Wortschatz, 101–154. Innsbruck: IBS.Google Scholar

McCone, Kim R. 2002. Wolfsbessenheit, Nacktheit, Einäugigkeit und verwandte Aspekte des altkeltischen Männerbündes. In: Das, Rahul Peter & Meiser, Gerhard (ed.), Geregeltes Ungestüm: Bruderschaft und Jugendbünde bei indogermanischen Völkern, 43–67. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar

Mittnik, A., et al. 2019. Kinship-based social inequality in Bronze Age Europe. Science 366(6466): 731–734.Google Scholar

Narasimhan, Vagheesh M., et al. 2019. The formation of of human populations in South and Central Asia. Science 365(6457).Google Scholar

Ó Cathasaigh, Tomás. 1986. The sister’s son in early Irish literature. Peritia 5: 128–160.Google Scholar

Olsen, Birgit Anette. 2019. Aspects of family structure among the Indo-Europeans. In: Olsen, Birgit Anette, Olander, Thomas, & Kristiansen, Kristian (ed.), Tracing the Indo-Europeans. New evidence from archaeology and historical linguistics, 145–163. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar

Olsen, Birgit Anette. 2020. Kin, clan and community in Proto-Indo-European society. In: Whitehead, Benedicte Nielsen, Olsen, Birgit Anette, & Jacquet, Janus Bahs (ed.), Kin, clan and community in prehistoric Europe, 39–180. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar

Petit, Daniel. 2010. Suffix transfer in Baltic. Baltistica 45(2): 173–184.Google Scholar

Pronk, Tijmen. 2013. Notes on Balto-Slavic etymology: Russian norov, mjat’, ruž’ë, dialectal xajat’ ‘to care’, xovat’ ‘to keep’ and their Slavic and Baltic cognates. Wiener Slavistisches Jahrbuch. Neue Folge 1: 294–303.Google Scholar

Risch, Ernst. 1944. Betrachtungen zu den indogermanischen Verwandtschaftsnamen. Museum Helveticum: Schweizerische Zeitschrift für klassische Altertumswissenschaft 1(2): 115–122.Google Scholar

Rix, Helmut (ed.). 2001 ². Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben. Die Wurzeln und ihre Primärstammbildungen. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar

Sergent, Bernard. 2003. Les troupes de jeunes hommes et l’expansion indo-européenne. Dialogues d’histoire ancienne 29(2): 9–27.Google Scholar

Sjörgen, Karl Göran et al. 2016. Diet and mobility in the Corded Ware of Central Europe. PLoS ONE 11(5): e0155083.Google Scholar

Sürenhagen, Dietrich. 1998. Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen und Erbrecht im althethitischen Königshaus vor Telipinu – ein erneuter Erklärungsversuch. Altorientalische Forschungen 25: 75–94.Google Scholar

Szemerényi, Oswald. 1977. Studies in the kinship terminology of the Indo-European languages, with special reference to Indian, Iranian, Greek and Latin. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Wackernagel, Jacob. 1912. Über einige antike Anredeformen. Göttingen: Officina academica Dieterichiani.Google Scholar

Zimmer, Stefan. 2003. Glimpses of Indo-European law. In: Feldbrugge, F. J. M. (ed.), The law’s beginnings, 115–136. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Allentoft, Morten E., Sikora, M., Sjögren, K. G., Rasmussen, S., Stenderup, J., Damgaard, P. B., et al. 2015. Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia. Nature 522: 167–173.Google Scholar

Anderson, Siwan. 2008. The economics of dowry and brideprice. Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(4): 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anthony, David W., & Brown, Dorcas R.. 2017. Molecular archaeology and Indo-European linguistics. In: Simmelkjær, Bjarne, Hansen, Sandgaard, et al. (ed.), Usque ad radices. Indo-European Studies in honour of Birgit Anette Olsen (Copenhagen Studies in Indo-European 8), 25–54. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar

Beekes, Robert. 1976. Uncle and nephew. Journal of Indo-European Studies 4(1): 43–63.Google Scholar

Beekes, Robert. 2010. Etymological dictionary of Greek. 2 vols. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Benveniste, Émile. 1969. Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes. 1. Économie, parenté, societé. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar

Bjørn, Rasmus Gudmundsen. 2017. Foreign elements in the Proto-Indo-European vocabulary. Master’s thesis, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Bremmer, Jan. 1976. Avunculate and fosterage. Journal of Indo-European Studies 4(1): 65–78.Google Scholar

Buck, Carl Darling. 1988 [1909]. A dictionary of selected synonyms in the principal Indo-European languages. A contribution to the history of ideas. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press. First published 1909.Google Scholar

Clackson, James. 2007. Indo-European linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Delbrück, Berthold. 1889. Die indogermanischen Verwandtschaftsnamen: ein Beitrag zur vergleichenden Altertumskunde (Abhandlung der philologisch-historischen Classe der Königl. Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaft, Band IX No. V). Leipzig: Hirtel.Google Scholar

Frei, Karin Margarita. 2015. Tracing the dynamic life story of a Bronze Age Female. Scientific Reports 5: 10431.Google Scholar

Frisk, Hjalmar. 1960–72. Griechisches etymologisches Wörterbuch 3 vols. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Gamkrelidze, Thomas V., & Ivanov, Vjačeslav V.. 1995. Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans: A reconstruction and historical analysis of a proto-language and a proto-culture. Vol 1. The text (Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 80). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haak, Wolfgang et. al. 2015. Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe. Nature 522 (7555): 207–211.Google Scholar

IEW = Pokorny, Julius. 1959. Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar

Janda, Michael. 2020. Wooing in Indo-European culture. In: Whitehead, Benedicte Nielsen, Olsen, Birgit Anette, & Jacquet, Janus Bahs (ed.), Kin, clan and community in Indo-European Society (Copenhagen Studies in Indo-European 9), 499–514. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar

Klingenschmitt, Gert. 2008. Lit. úošvis. Baltistica 43(3): 405–430.Google Scholar

Knipper, Corina, et al. 2017. Female exogamy and gene pole diversification at the transition from the Final Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age in central Europe. PNAS 114(38): 10083–10088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koivulehto, Jorma. 1994. Indogermanisch–Uralisch: Lehnbeziehungen der (auch) Urverwandtschaft. In: Sternemann, Reinhard (ed.), Bopp-Symposium 1992 der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Akten der Konferenz vom 24. 3.–26.3. 1992 aus Anlaß von Franz Bopps zweihundertjährigem Geburtstag am 14. 9. 1991, 132–48. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

Kölligan, Daniel. 2014. Indogermanisch und Armenisch. Studien zur historischen Grammatik des Klassisch-Armenischen. Habilitationsschrift, Institut für Linguistik, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar

Kristiansen, Kristian et al. 2017. Re-theorising mobility and the formation of culture and language among the Corded Ware Culture in Europe. Antiquity 91(353): 334–347.Google Scholar

Lamberterie, Charles de. 2018. Dérivé ou compose? L’adjectif ałk^cat “pauvre” de l’arménien classique. Handout from the colloquium Dérivation nominale et innovations dans les langues indo-européennes anciennes, Université de Rouen, October 2018.Google Scholar

Lansing, J. Stephen, et al. 2017. Kinship structures create persistent channels for language transmission.Google Scholar

Mallory, James P., & Adams, Douglas Quentin. 1997. Encyclopedia of Indo-European culture. London & Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn.Google Scholar

Mittnik, Alissa. 2019. Kinship-based social inequality in Bronze Age Europe. Science 366(6466): 731–734.Google Scholar

Morgenstierne, Georg. 1927. An etymological dictionary of Pashto (Skrifter utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo, II, Hist-Filos. Klasse 3). Oslo: Dybwad.Google Scholar

Olander, Thomas. 2019. Indo-European cladistic nomenclature. Indogermanische Forschungen 124: 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsen, Birgit Anette. 2012. A note on Indo-European in-laws. In Cooper, Adam I., Rau, Jeremy, & Weiss, Michael (ed.), Multi nominis grammaticus: Studies in Classical and Indo-European linguistics in honor of Alan J. Nussbaum, on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday, 213–216. Ann Arbor (MI): Beech Stave Press.Google Scholar

Olsen, Birgit Anette. 2019. Aspects of family structure among the Indo-Europeans. In: Olsen, Birgit Anette, Olander, Thomas, & Kristiansen, Kristian (ed.), Tracing the Indo-Europeans. New evidence from archaeology and historical linguistics, 145–163. Oxford: Oxbow Press.Google Scholar

Olsen, Birgit Anette. 2020. Kin, clan and community in Proto-Indo-European. In: Whitehead, Benedicte Nielsen, Olsen, Birgit Anette, & Jacquet, Janus Bahs (ed.), Kin, clan and community in Indo-European Society (Copenhagen Studies in Indo-European 9), 39–180. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar

Persson, Charlotte Price. 2017. Another female Bronze Age icon is now known to have travelled across Europe. Science Nordic, April 10, 2017.Google Scholar

Pinault, Georges-Jean. 2013. The lady (almost) vanishes. In: Cooper, Adam I., Rau, Jeremy, & Weiss, Michael (ed.), Multi nominis grammaticus: Studies in Classical and Indo-European linguistics in honor of Alan J. Nussbaum, on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday, 240–254. Ann Arbor (MI): Beech Stave.Google Scholar

Pinault, Georges-Jean. 2017. The self-representation of the Indo-European society through kinship terms. In: Bichlmeier, Harald & Opferman, Andreas (ed.), Das Menschenbild bei den Indogermanern, 81–112. Hamburg: Baar.Google Scholar

Puhvel, Jaan. 1991. Hittite etymological dictionary. Vol. 3. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, S., et al. 2015. Early divergent strains of Yersenia pestis in Eurasia 5,000 years ago. Cell 163(3): 571–82.Google Scholar

Tremblay, Xavier. 2003. La déclinaison des noms de parenté indo-européens en -ter- (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 106). Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar

Allentoft, Morten E., Sikora, Martin, Sjögren, Karl-Göran, Rasmussen, Simon, Rasmussen, Morten, Stenderup, Jesper, Damgaard, Peter B., et al. 2015. Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia. Nature 522(7555): 167–172.Google Scholar

Andrades Valtueña, Aida, Mittnik, Alissa, Key, Felix M., Haak, Wolfgang, Allmäe, Raili, Belinskij, Andrej B., Daubaras, Mantas, et al. 2017. The Stone Age plague and its persistence in Eurasia. Current Biology 27(23): 3683–3691.Google Scholar

Anthony, David W. Forthcoming. Migration, ancient DNA, and Bronze Age pastoralists from the Eurasian Steppes. In: Daniels, Megan J. (ed.), Homo Migrans: Modelling mobility and migration in human history (IEMA Distinguished Monograph Series). Buffalo: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Biga, Maria G. 2000. Wet-nurses at Ebla: A prosopographic study. Vicino Oriente 12: 59–88.Google Scholar

Biga, Maria G. 2016. The role of women in work and society in the Ebla Kingdom (Syria, 24th century BC). In: Lion, Brigitte & Michel, Cécile (ed.), The role of women in work and society in the ancient Near East, 71–89. Boston & Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Dunne, Julie, Rebay-Salisbury, Katharina, Salisbury, Roderick B., Frisch, A., Walton-Doyle, Caitlin, & Evershed, Richard P.. 2019. Milk of ruminants in ceramic baby bottles from prehistoric child graves. Nature 574: 246–248.Google Scholar

Eshed, Vered, Gopher, Avi, Gage, Timothy B., & Hershkovitz, Israel. 2004. Has the transition to agriculture reshaped the demographic structure of prehistoric populations? New evidence from the Levant. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 124(4): 315–329.Google Scholar

Fernandes, Daniel M., Mittnik, Alissa, Olalde, Iñigo, Lazaridis, Iosif, Cheronet, Olivia, Rohland, Nadin, Mallick, Swapan, et al. 2020. The spread of steppe and Iranian-related ancestry in the islands of the western Mediterranean. Nature Ecology & Evolution 4(3): 334–345.Google Scholar

Frei, Karin M., Mannering, Ulla, Kristiansen, Kristian, Allentoft, Morten E., Wilson, Andrew S., Skals, Irene, Tridico, Silvana, et al. 2015. Tracing the dynamic life story of a Bronze Age female. Scientific Reports 5: 10431.Google Scholar

Frei, Karin M., Villa, Chiara, Jørkov, Marie L., Allentoft, Morten E., Kaul, Flemming, Ethelberg, Per, Reiter, Samantha S., et al. 2017. A matter of months: High precision migration chronology of a Bronze Age female. PLoS ONE 12(6): e0178834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fulminante, Francesca. 2015. Infant feeding practices in Europe and the Mediterranean from prehistory to the Middle Ages: A comparison between the historical sources and bioarchaeology. Childhood in the Past 8(1): 24–47.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Amy, Günther, Torsten, Rosenberg, Noah A., & Jakobsson, Mattias. 2017. Ancient X chromosomes reveal contrasting sex bias in Neolithic and Bronze Age Eurasian migrations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114(10): 2657–2662.Google Scholar

Haak, Wolfgang, Brandt, Guido, de Jong, Hylke N., Meyer, Christian, Ganslmeier, Robert, Heyd, Volker, Hawkesworth, Chris, et al. 2008. Ancient DNA, strontium isotopes, and osteological analyses shed light on social and kinship organization of the Later Stone Age. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105(47): 18226–18231.Google Scholar

Haak, Wolfgang, Lazaridis, Iosif, Patterson, Nick, Rohland, Nadin, Mallick, Swapan, Llamas, Bastien, Brandt, Guido, et al. 2015. Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe. Nature 522(7555): 207–211.Google Scholar

Juras, Anna, Chyleński, Maciej, Ehler, Edvard, Malmström, Helena, Żurkiewicz, Danuta, Włodarczak, Piotr, Wilk, Stanisław, et al. 2018. Mitochondrial genomes reveal an east to west cline of steppe ancestry in Corded Ware populations. Scientific Reports 8(1): 11603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Knipper, Corina, Mittnik, Alissa, Massy, Ken, Kociumaka, Catharina, Kucukkalipci, Isil, Maus, Michael, Wittenborn, Fabian, et al. 2017. Female exogamy and gene pool diversification at the transition from the Final Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age in Central Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114(38): 10083–10088.Google Scholar

Kristiansen, Kristian. Forthcoming. Towards a new prehistory. Re-theorizing genes, cultures, and migratory expansions. In: Daniels, Megan J. (ed.), Homo Migrans: modelling mobility and migration in human history (IEMA Distinguished Monograph Series). Buffalo: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Kristiansen, Kristian, Allentoft, Morten E., Frei, Karin M., Iversen, Rune, Johannsen, Niels N., Kroonen, Guus, Pospieszny, Łukasz, et al. 2017. Re-theorising mobility and the formation of culture and language among the Corded Ware Culture in Europe. Antiquity. A Quarterly Review of Archaeology 91(356): 334–347.Google Scholar

Lallemand, Suzanne. 2007. La circulation des enfants en société traditionnelle: Prêt, don, échange (Anthropologie. Connaissance des hommes). Paris: Editions L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Massy, Ken. 2018. Die Gräber der Frühbronzezeit im südlichen Bayern. Untersuchungen zu den Bestattungs- und Beigabensitten sowie gräberfeldimmanenten Strukturen (Materialhefte zur bayerischen Archäologie 107). Kallmünz: Verlag Michael Lassleben.Google Scholar

Mittnik, Alissa, Massy, Ken, Knipper, Corina, Wittenborn, Fabian, Friedrich, Ronny, Pfrengle, Saskia, Burri, Marta, et al. 2019. Kinship-based social inequality in Bronze Age Europe. Science 366(6466): 731–734.Google Scholar

Müller-Scheeßel, Nils, Grupe, Gisela, & Tütken, Thomas. 2015. In der Obhut von Verwandten? Die Zirkulation von Kindern und Jugendlichen in der Eisenzeit Mitteleuropas. In: Karl, Raimund & Leskovar, Jutta (ed.), Interpretierte Eisenzeiten: Fallstudien, Methoden, Theorie. Tagungsbeträge der 6. Linzer Gespräche zur interpretativen Eisenzeitarchäologie (Studien zur Kulturgeschichte von Oberösterreich 42), 9–23. Linz: Oberösterreichisches Landesmuseum.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, Thomas C. (ed.). 2020. Fosterage in medieval Ireland: An emotional history (The Early Medieval North Atlantic). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Olalde, Iñigo, Brace, Selina, Allentoft, Morten E., Armit, Ian, Kristiansen, Kristian, Booth, Thomas J., Rohland, Nadin, et al. 2018. The Beaker phenomenon and the genomic transformation of northwest Europe. Nature 555(7695): 190–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Olalde, Iñigo, Mallick, Swapan, Patterson, Nick, Rohland, Nadin, Villalba-Mouco, Vanessa, Silva, Marina, Dulias, Katharina, et al. 2019. The genomic history of the Iberian Peninsula over the past 8000 years. Science 363(6432): 1230–1234.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Simon, Allentoft, Morten E., Nielsen, Kasper, Orlando, Ludovic, Sikora, Martin, Sjögren, Karl-Göran, Pedersen, Anders G., et al. 2015. Early divergent strains of Yersinia pestis in Eurasia 5,000 years ago. Cell 163(3): 571–582.Google Scholar

Rebay-Salisbury, Katharina. 2017a. Big Mamas? Mutterschaft und sozialer Status im eisenzeitlichen Mitteleuropa. In: Keller, Christin & Winger, Katja (ed.), Frauen an der Macht? Neue interdisziplinäre Ansätze zur Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung für die Eisenzeit Mitteleuropas (Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie 299), 57–73. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar

Rebay-Salisbury, Katharina. 2017b. Breast is best – and are there alternatives? Feeding babies and young children in prehistoric Europe. Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien 147: 13–29.Google Scholar

Schroeder, Hannes, Margaryan, Ashot, Szmyt, Marzena, Theulot, Bertrand, Włodarczak, Piotr, Rasmussen, Simon, Gopalakrishnan, Shyam, et al. 2019. Unraveling ancestry, kinship, and violence in a Late Neolithic mass grave. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116(22): 10705–10710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sjögren, Karl-Göran, Olalde, Inigo, Carver, Sophie, Allentoft, Morten E., Knowles, Tim, Kroonen, Guus, Pike, Alistair W., et al. 2020. Kinship and social organization in Copper Age Europe. A cross-disciplinary analysis of archaeology, DNA, isotopes, and anthropology from two Bell Beaker cemeteries. Plos ONE 15(11): e0241278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sjögren, Karl-Göran, Price, T. Douglas, & Kristiansen, Kristian. 2016. Diet and mobility in the Corded Ware of central Europe. PLoS ONE 11(5): e0155083.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Stefan, Brugger, Christine, & Bereuter, Elmar (ed.). 2012. Die Schwabenkinder: Arbeit in der Fremde vom 17. bis 20. Jahrhundert. Ostfildern: Thorbecke Verlag.Google Scholar

Anonymous. Rhetorica ad Herennium. Harry Caplan (transl.) (Loeb Classical Library 403). Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press 1953.Google Scholar

Appian. Vol. 3: The civil wars, Books 1–3.26. Horace White (transl.) (Loeb Classical Library 4). Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press 1913.Google Scholar

Benveniste, Émile. 1932. Le nom de l’esclave à Rome. Révue des Études Latines 10(2): 429–440.Google Scholar

Benveniste, Émile. 1969. Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-européennes. Vol. 1. Économie, parenté, société. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar

Blumenthal, Debra G. 2000. Implements of labor, instruments of honor: Muslim, Eastern and Black African slaves in fifteenth-century Valencia. PhD diss., University of Toronto.Google Scholar

Bock, Bettina, Lotze, Stefan, Zeilfelder, Susanne, & Ziegler, Sabine. 2015. Deutsche Wortfeldetymologie in europäischem Kontext. Vol. 3. Mensch und Mitmensch. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar

Bréal, Míchel. 1889. De l’importance du sens en étymologie et en grammaire. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 6: 163–175.Google Scholar

Bréal, Michel, & Bailly, Anatole. 1885. Dictionnaire étymologique Latin. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar

Brown, Christopher Leslie, & Morgan, Philip D (ed.). 2006. Arming slaves: From classical times to the modern age. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Brugmann, Karl. 1906. Zu den Benennungen der Personen des dienenden Standes in den indogermanischen Sprachen. Indogermanische Forschungen 19: 377–391.Google Scholar

Bryce, Trevor. 2002. Life and society in the Hittite world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Buck, Carl Darling. 1904. A grammar of Oscan and Umbrian. 2nd rev. ed. Boston: Ginn & Company.Google Scholar

Cato the Elder & Varro. On Agriculture. W. D. Hooper & Harrison Boyd Ash (transl.) (Loeb Classical Library 283). Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press 1934.Google Scholar

Cicero. 1949. On invention. The best kind of orator. Topics. Translated by H. M. Hubbell. Loeb Classical Library 386. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Darmesteter, James. 1875. Notes sur quelques expressions zendes. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique 2: 300–317.Google Scholar

Duchesne-Guillemin, Jacques. 1946. Études hittites Transactions of the Philological Society 45: 73–91.Google Scholar

Duhoux, Yves. 1996. Review of Rix 1994. L’Antiquité Classique 65(1): 365.Google Scholar

Ernout, Alfred, & Meillet, Antoine. 1959. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine. 4th ed. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar

FAO. 2001. Pastoralism in the new millenium. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 150. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar

Finley, Moses. 1998 [1980]. Ancient slavery and modern ideology. Edited by Shaw, Brent D.. Princeton (NJ): Marcus Wiener Publishers. First published 1980 by Viking Press.Google Scholar

Gaius. 1904. Gai institutiones, or: Institutes of Roman law. Translated by Edward Poste, E. A. Whittuck, & A. H. J. Greenidge. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gardani, Francesco. 2013. Dynamics of morphological productivity: The evolution of noun classes from Latin to Italian. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Hodkinson, Stephen. 2014. Pastoralism, Greek. In: Hornblower, Simon, Spawforth, Antony, & Eidinow, Esther (ed.), The Oxford companion to classical civilization. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ingold, Tim. 2000. The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Katz, Joshua T. 2006. The “‘urbi et orbi’-rule” revisited. Journal of Indo-European Studies 34(3–4): 319–362.Google Scholar

Kloekhorst, Alwin. 2006. Initial laryngeals in Anatolian. Historische Sprachforschung 119: 77–108.Google Scholar

Kloekhorst, Alwin. 2007. The Hittite inherited lexicon. Leiden: Leiden University.Google Scholar

Kroonen, Guus. 2013. Etymological dictionary of Proto-Germanic. Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 11. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Langslow, David. 1997. Review of Rix 1994. Kratylos 42: 99–104.Google Scholar

Leumann, Manu. 1977. Lateinische Grammatik. Vol. 1. Lateinische Laut‑ und Formenlehre. 2nd ed. Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft 2.2.1. Munich: C. H. Beck. First published 1926–28.Google Scholar

Lévy-Bruhl, Henri. 1934. Quelques problèmes du très ancien droit romain: Essai de Solutions Sociologiques. Paris: Les éditions Domat-Montchrestien.Google Scholar

Lewis, Juan. 2013. Did Varro think that slaves were tools? Mnemosyne 66(4–5): 634–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Livy. History of Rome. Vol. 11: Books 38–40. J. C. Yardley (transl.) (Loeb Classical Library 313). Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press 1922.Google Scholar

Loth, Joseph. 1905. Contribution á la lexicographie et l’étymologie celtiques. In: d’Arbois de Jubainville, H. (ed.), Mélanges : Recueil de mémoires concernant la littérature et l’histoire celtiques dédié à M. H. d’Arbois de Jubainville à l’occassion du 78e anniversaire de sa naissance. Paris: Ancienne Librairie Thorin et fils.Google Scholar

Marshall, Lydia Wilson. 2016. Introduction: The comparative archaeology of slavery. In: Marshall, Lydia Wilson (ed.), The archaeology of slavery: A comparative approach to captivity and coercion, 1–23. Carbondale (IL): Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Martzloff, Vincent. 2006. Les thèmes de présent en yod dans l’épigraphie italique et en latin archaïque. PhD diss., Université Lumière–Lyon II.Google Scholar

Meiser, Gerhard. 2018. The phonology of Italic. In: Klein, Jared, Joseph, B. D., Fritz, Matthias, & Wenthe, Mark (ed.), Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics 2. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Morris, Sarah. 2018. Material evidence: Looking for slaves? The archaeological record: Greece. In: Hodkinson, Stephen, Kleijwegt, Marc, & Vlassopoulos, Kostas (ed.), The Oxford handbook of Greek and Roman slaveries. Oxford: Oxford University Press Web.Google Scholar

Mouritsen, Henrik. 2011. The freedman in the Roman world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Murdock, G. P., & White, D. R.. 1969. Standard cross-cultural samples. Ethnology 8: 329–369.Google Scholar

Myrdal, Janken. 2011. Milking and grinding, digging and herding: Slaves and farmwork 1000–1300. In: Poulsen, Bjørn & Sindbæk, Søren Michael (ed.), Settlement and lordship in Viking and Early Medieval Scandinavia. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

Nielsen Whitehead, Benedicte. 2020. Family structures in Rome: The Roman family and its free and unfree members. In: Whitehead, Benedicte Nielsen, Olsen, Birgit Anette, & Jacquet, Janus Bahs (ed.), Kin, clan and community in Indo-European Society (Copenhagen Studies in Indo-European 9), 233–359. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Alan J. 2017. Agentive and other derivatives of the “τόμος-type” nouns. In: Feuvre, Claire Le, Petit, Daniel, & Pinault, Georges-Jean (ed.), Verbal adjectives and participles in Indo-European languages: Proceedings of the Conference of the Society for Indo-European Studies (Indogermanische Gesellschaft), Paris, 24th to 26th September 2014 = Adjectifs verbaux et participes dans les langues indo-européennes, 233–266. Bremen: Hempen Verlag.Google Scholar

Olsen, Birgit Anette. 1999. The noun in Biblical Armenian: With special emphasis on the Indo-European heritage. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 199. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsen, Birgit Anette. 2003. Another account of the Latin adjectives in -idus. Historische Sprachforschung 116(2), 234–275.Google Scholar

Olsen, Birgit Anette. 2020. Kin, clan and community in Proto-Indo-European Society. In: Whitehead, Benedicte Nielsen, Olsen, Birgit Anette, & Jacquet, Janus Bahs (ed.), Kin, Clan and Community in Indo-European Society (Copenhagen Studies in Indo-European 9), 39–180. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum.Google Scholar

Pârvulescu, Adrian. 2010. Lat. servus. Indogermanische Forschungen 115: 190–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patterson, Orlando. 1982. Slavery and social death: A comparative study. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Patterson, Orlando. 2008. Slavery, gender, and work in the pre-modern world and early Greece: A cross-cultural analysis. In: Dal Lago, Enrico & Katsari, Constantina (ed.), Slave systems, ancient and modern, 32–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Diaconus, Paulus. De verborum significatu quae supersunt cum Pauli epitome. Thewrewkianis copiis usus. Edited by Lindsay, Wallace M.. Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana 1349. Berlin: De Gruyter 1997. First published 1913 by Teubner.Google Scholar

Pinault, Georges-Jean. 2011. Let us now praise famous gems. Tocharian and Indo-European Studies 12: 155–220.Google Scholar

Plutarch. 1916. Lives. Vol. 3. Pericles and Fabius Maximus. Nicias and Crassus. Loeb Classical Library 65. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Pokorny, Julius. 1959. Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Vol. 1. 3rd ed. Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Jens Elmegård. 1989. Studien zur Morphophonemik der indogermanischen Grundsprache. Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Spachwissenschaftt 55. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar

Risch, Ernst. 1974. Wortbildung der homerischen Sprache. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Rix, Helmut. 1994. Die Termini der Unfreiheit in den Sprachen Alt-Italiens. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar

Rix, Helmut, Kümmel, Martin Joachim, Zehnder, Thomas, Lipp, Reiner, & Schirmer, Brigitte. 2001. LIV: Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben. 2nd ed. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, Junius P. 1997. The historical encyclopedia of world slavery. Santa Barbara (CA): ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar

de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1931 [1915]. Cours de linguistique générale. 3rd ed. Edited by Bally, Charles, Sechehaye, Charles Albert, & Riedlinger, Albert. Paris: Payot. First published 1915.Google Scholar

Schrijver, Peter. 1991. The reflexes of the Proto-Indo-European laryngeals in Latin. Leiden Studies in Indo-European 2. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Stewart, Roberta. 2012. Plautus and Roman slavery. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Suetonius. Lives of the Caesars. Vol. 1: Julius. Augustus. Tiberius. Gaius. Caligula. J.C. Rolfe (transl.) (Loeb Classical Library 31). Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press 1914.Google Scholar

Suetonius. 1914. Lives of the Caesars. Vol. 1. Julius. Augustus. Tiberius. Gaius. Caligula. Translated by J. C. Rolfe. Loeb Classical Library 31. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sütterlin, Ludwig. 1891. Zur Geschichte der verba denominativa im Altgriechischen. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner.Google Scholar

Sütterlin, Ludwig. 1906. Die Denominativverba im Altindischen. Indogermanische Forschungen 19(1): 480–577.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. J., Bevan, Gareth A., & Donovan, Patrick A.. 1950. Geiriadur Prifysgol Cymru: A dictionary of the Welsh language. Dublin: Gwasg Prifysgol Cymru.Google Scholar

Untermann, Jürgen. 2000. Wörterbuch des Oskisch-Umbrischen. Indogermanische Bibliothek, 1. Reihe: Lehr‑ und Handbücher. Handbuch der italischen Dialekte 3. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.Google Scholar

De Vaan, Michiel Arnoud Cor. 2008. Etymological dictionary of Latin and the other Italic languages. Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 7. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Varro. On the Latin language. Vol. 1: Books 5–7. Roland, G. Kent (transl.) (Loeb Classical Library 333). Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press 1938.Google Scholar

Vendryes, Joseph. 1935. A propos de lat. seruos. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 36: 124–130.Google Scholar

Vine, Brent Harmon. 2004. On PIE full grades in some zero-grade contexts: *-tí‑, *-tó‑. In: Clackson, James & Olsen, Birgit Anette (ed.), Indo-European Word Formation, 357–379. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar

Vine, Brent Harmon. 2006. On ‘Thurneysen-Havet’s law’ in Latin and Italic. Historische Sprachforschung/Historical Linguistics 119: 211–249.Google Scholar

Vine, Brent Harmon. 2012. PIE mobile accent in Italic: Further evidence. In: Whitehead, Benedicte Nielsen, Olander, Thomas, Olsen, Birgit Anette, & Rasmussen, Jens Elmegård (ed.), The Sound of Indo-European: Phonetics, phonemics, and morphophonemics, 545–575. Copenhagen Studies in Indo-European 4. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum.Google Scholar

Wackernagel, Jacob. 1910. Zur griechsichen Wortlehre. Glotta 2: 1–8.Google Scholar

Walde, Alois, & Hofmann, J. B.. 1938 [1906]. Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Hofmann, J. B.: 3rd, revised ed. Indogermanische Bibliothek, Abt. 1, Reihe 2(1). Heidelberg: Winter. First published 1906.Google Scholar

Warmington, E. H. 1936. Remains of Old Latin 2: Livius Andronicus. Naevius. Pacuvius. Accius (Loeb Classical Library 314). Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Warmington, E. H. 1938. Remains of Old Latin. Vol. 3. Lucilius. The Twelve Tables. Loeb Classical Library 329. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Watkins, Calvert. 1976. Varia I. Ériu 27: 116–122.Google Scholar

Watkins, Calvert. 1995. How to kill a dragon. Aspects of Indo-European poetics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wiedemann, Thomas Ernst Josef. 1998. Review of Rix 1994. The Classical Review 48(1): 227–228.Google Scholar

Wodtko, Dagmar S., Irslinger, Britta, & Schneider, Carolin. 2008. Nomina im indogermanischen Lexikon. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar

Woodard, Roger D. 2013. Myth, ritual, and the warrior in Roman and Indo-European antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zelnick-Abramovitz, Rachel. 2018. Greek and Roman terminologies of slavery. In: Hodkinson, Stephen, Kleijwegt, Marc, & Vlassopoulos, Kostas (ed.), The Oxford handbook of Greek and Roman slaveries. Oxford: Oxford University Press Web.Google Scholar