Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T14:33:50.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why is system 1/system 2 switching affectively loaded?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2023

Charlie Kurth Open the ORCID record for Charlie Kurth [Opens in a new window]
Charlie Kurth*
Affiliation:
Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Department of Philosophy, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA charles.kurth@wmich.edu www.charliekurth.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Why are only some occasions of system 1 to system 2 switching affectively loaded? This commentary not only draws attention to this neglected phenomenon, but also shows how research in philosophy and the social and cognitive sciences sheds light on it, doing so in ways that may help answer some of the open questions that De Neys's paper highlights.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e128
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arango-Muñoz, S. (2011). Two levels of metacognition. Philosophia, 39, 71–82.10.1007/s11406-010-9279-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Sousa, R. (2008). Epistemic feelings. In Brun, G., Doğuoğlu, U., & Kuenzle, D. (Eds.), Epistemology and emotions (pp. 185–204). Ashgate.Google Scholar
Fernando, A. G., Sivakumaran, B., & Suganthi, L. (2016). Message involvement and attitude towards green advertisements. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 34, 863–882.10.1108/MIP-11-2015-0216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurth, C. (2015). Moral anxiety and moral agency. In Timmons, M. (Ed.), Oxford studies in normative ethics (Vol. 5, pp. 171–195). Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198744665.003.0009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurth, C. (2018a). Emotion, deliberation, and the skill model of virtuous agency. Mind & Language, 33, 299–317.10.1111/mila.12186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurth, C. (2018b). The anxious mind. MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/11168.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, M., Wolak, J., Keele, L., & Marcus, G. (2010). Civil engagements. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 440–458.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00440.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2014). Tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) states: Mechanisms and metacognitive control. In Schwartz, B. & Brown, A. (Eds.), Tip-of-the-tongue states and related phenomena (Vol. 39, pp. 737–749). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, V. (2009). Dual-process theories: A metacognitive perspective. In Evans, J. & Frankish, K. (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 171–195). Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, N., Hutchings, V., Banks, A., & Davis, A. (2008). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Political Psychology, 29, 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar