Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T05:59:54.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social norms, mentalising, and common knowledge, in making peace and war

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2024

Vincent Riordan Open the ORCID record for Vincent Riordan [Opens in a new window]
Vincent Riordan*
Affiliation:
West Cork Mental Health Services, Department of Psychiatry, Bantry Hospital, Bantry, County Cork, Ireland vincent.riordan@hse.ie
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The emergence of social norms would have been dependent on the evolution of the cognitive capacity for mentalising to multiple orders of intentionality. Common knowledge is a related phenomenon that can solve coordination problems. That the same cognitive and social mechanisms should facilitate both peace and war is resonant with Girard's scapegoat hypothesis on the relationship between violence and religion.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 47 , 2024 , e23
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

De Freitas, J., Thomas, K., DeScioli, P., & Pinker, S. (2019). Common knowledge, coordination, and strategic mentalizing in human social life. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(28), 13751–13758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeScioli, P., & Kurzban, R. (2013). A solution to the mysteries of morality. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2014). Mind the gap: Or why humans aren't just great apes (pp. 3–18). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Girard, R. (1977). Violence and the sacred (P. Gregory, Trans.). Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girard, R. (1986). The scapegoat (Y. Freccero, Trans.). John Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Launay, J., Pearce, E., Wlodarski, R., van Duijn, M., Carney, J., & Dunbar, R. I. (2015). Higher-order mentalising and executive functioning. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (2008). Convention: A philosophical study. John Wiley.Google Scholar
Riordan, D. V. (2021). The scapegoat mechanism in human evolution: An analysis of René Girard's hypothesis on the process of hominization. Biological Theory, 16(4), 242–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., & Carpenter, M. (2007). Shared intentionality. Developmental Science, 10(1), 121–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed