Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:28:12.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observing effects in various contexts won't give us general psychological theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2022

Chris Donkin Open the ORCID record for Chris Donkin [Opens in a new window] ,
Aba Szollosi  and
Neil R. Bramley
Chris Donkin
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, 2052Sydney, Australiachristopher.donkin@gmail.com
Aba Szollosi
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, EdinburghEH8, Scotland, aba.szollosi@gmail.com, neil.bramley@ed.ac.uk
Neil R. Bramley
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, EdinburghEH8, Scotland, aba.szollosi@gmail.com, neil.bramley@ed.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Generalization does not come from repeatedly observing phenomena in numerous settings, but from theories explaining what is general in those phenomena. Expecting future behavior to look like past observations is especially problematic in psychology, where behaviors change when people's knowledge changes. Psychology should thus focus on theories of people's capacity to create and apply new representations of their environments.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e13
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bramley, N. R., Dayan, P., Griffiths, T. L., & Lagnado, D. A. (2017). Formalizing Neurath's ship: Approximate algorithms for online causal learning. Psychological Review, 124(3), 301–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000061CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behaviour. Language, 35(1), 26–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/411334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, D. (2011). The beginning of infinity: Explanations that transform the world. Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1739). A treatise of human nature. London: John Noon.Google Scholar
Lake, B. M., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gershman, S. J. (2017). Building machines that learn and think like people. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e253. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16001837CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2021). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between confirmatory and exploratory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 717–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szollosi, A., & Newell, B. R. (2020). People as intuitive scientists: Reconsidering statistical explanations of decision making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(12), 1008–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.09.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Rooij, I., & Baggio, G. (2021). Theory before the test: How to build high-verisimilitude explanatory theories in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 682–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970604CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed